Added: 1 year ago
From: BleuroydeFrance
Views: 24,463
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (119)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i would love to assist in a medieval royal coronation

  • The French basically are Germans. They descend from the German tribe the Franks and most of their names like Richard, William and Henry are all old German names, without Germany the French are nothing.

  • @MultiAngryguy

    "without Germany the French are nothing" you are wrong without the Germanic the French would not have certainly existed .

  • Très belle vidéo, merci beaucoup.

  • nobody tries to tell about Bertrand Du Guesclin. whyy

    he is also one person of the true heroes of French!

  • Where can I download this movie, For portuguese or Subtitle in portuguese? Please reply me someone?

  • LOL For the ending.

  • @youkn0wme Lol the Black prince was descended from the King of France and French nobility lol.

    Do you seriously think the English stock, that low class filth, could have done anything?

    The flower of the English nobility were whipped of the earth in 1066 and replaced by Frenchmen.

    Even your royal motto is in French, the three lions a French symbol, your castles and churches, even your names like Charles, Henry, Richard...

    The native English can only watch telly & drink beer

  • @hyurgy125 The English were defeated by Normans in 1066 not by French. In fact there was not such thing as French "People" until French Revolution. A Breton wasnt french neither was a Flemish. A Gascon. Occitan or anny other people in French Kingdmon for most Medieval History the French King had no autority over his realms so you claim a Modern France existante in Medieval Period? Are you mad? And English were such good intelectuals as anny other european people.

  • @ImperialGuard9001

    Ever heard of the kingdom of the Franks??

    Half of the Norman army at 1066 was from other regions of France.

    The English were never united, fucked & owned by the Danes, then by the Normans (and other Frenchmen who came along) in 1066. Then again by the French in 1154 with Henry II.

    What is there of English in the "English" nobility?

    No other nations nobility has been so utterly replaced as the English.

    You are the sons of France.

  • @hyurgy125 Yes I hear about Franks half of them are now Germans xD. Two thirds of the Norman army was from Normandy only One third was from Britanny(not Franks) Flemish and "Franks" that is from anny region where Franks once rulled.English are anny other people are made of several peoples mainly of Germanic "stock" i dont see that as negative.Europeans peoples mingle whats the problem with that? And I am not English or British for that matter.

  • @hyurgy125

    The Siege of Lille was a Second World War battle fought during the Battle of France. It took place from 28-31 May 1940 in the surroundings of the city of Lille, France during the Battle of France. It involved the remaining 40,000 men of the once-formidable French First Army in a delaying action against seven German divisions, including three armoured divisions, which were attempting to cut off and destroy the Allied armies at Dunkirk.

    .

  • @ImperialGuard9001

    You perhaps also believe in the self-written version of history by the English that England was never conquered Again after 1066.

    Not only did the French conquer England again in 1154 under Henry II but it was not at all the last time.

    In 1688 future William III of England a Dutchman assembled a large army in the then called United Provinces and went to sea and conquered England and became King.

    The English surrendered without a fight.

  • @hyurgy125 Henry II was the grandson of Henry I a Norman King that married an "Anglo Saxon" Wife that gave birth to the mother of Henry II.Saing that he was French(a modern nation-state) is at minimal anachronistic.

  • @hyurgy125 William III`s succession to the throne in 1688 in the so called Glorious Revolution was not a case of England being conquered, thats totally absurd. It was merely the replacing of one aristocrat who was hated by the people with another who was supported by the majority of the people. That`s why there wasn`t a fight, he was cheered not attacked. The Glorious Revolution is the most inappropiatly named revolution of all time. It should be called the Fuck All Happened Revolution.

  • @InkSmudge81

    William landed at Brixham in southwest England on 5 November 1688 and with him came 11,000-foot and 4,000 horse soldiers from the United Provinces. Perhaps these soldiers just came for tea? The English had to keep their mouth shut as usual. The English wanted William to be a consort, he refused and did what he wanted.

    You Brits are really good in re-writing history.

    You people can't fight in a war if you don't have allies doing the warring for you.

  • @hyurgy125 You really are deluded aren`t you.

    I`m no small minded nationalist who hates france, you are a great nation which has made many contributions to humanity, you really don`t need to invent history to try to give your nation a sense of false superiority.

    You say allies as if thats a bad thing. having no allies either makes you an idiot or unpopular, or both.

    How many men from other nations made up the Grande armee?

  • @hyurgy125 William was allied to English Parlimentarians who wished to overthow King James.William laid careful plans over a number of months for an invasion, which he hoped to execute in September 1688. William would not invade England without assurances of English support, and so in April, he asked for a formal invitation to be issued by a group of leading English statesmen. William was supported in his succession by the English people who hated the catholicism of James

    Fact not your fiction

  • @hyurgy125 of course when I say YOUR nation its not actually your nation as you`re Canadian. You`re no more French than I`m Scottish or Irish due to the fact I have Scottish and Irish ancestry.

    You`re nothing more than a nationalist caricature of a country you`re not from.It`s the same as when you see people from Gibraltar wearing bowler hats and waving union jacks or americans wearing green suits on st patricks day.It`s an insane desperate need to feel a sense of belonging.

  • @hyurgy125 You can`t re-invent family aristocratic successions as great victories of modern nation sates. The entre concept of France and the UK are relitively modern inventions. For English nationalists to claim Crecy as a great English victory when the English leaders in the battle didn`t speak a word of English and equally for French nationalists to claim victories when France was made up of autonomous kingdoms who spoke different languages is laughable and historically simplistic.

  • @ImperialGuard9001

    You do know that King Richard the Lionheart was French and spoke no English what so ever and spent only 6 months of his life in England.

    Funny how you try to change facts, real history is not a Ridley Scott movie, were all talk English suddenly.

    There is a reason why the English nobility spoke French for 400 years.

  • @hyurgy125 Calling them French is anachronistic there was no French people as we know them today. You are correct most of English Aristocracy did speak Old French. But since you name King Richard. Richard was from Aquitanie a land where very few French was spoken since Occitans was the norm of the people that live there. So the issue is more complex than it appears. Medieval times were very different from now. In some way is a reason why is more mystical than nowsdays at least for me.

  • @hyurgy125 so if the "english" were "french" as you say, what was the point of the 100 years war ? why the "french" did not want to accept a french king from the "north"

  • @Balamutus3000

    Because they already had their choice. For fucks sakes check the family background of the so called English Henry V and his nobility.

    The French slaughtered all the fucking native nobility in 1066 and replaced it with French nobility.

    If England was so united it was because it became so after 1066 when the new ruling class from France came and took thinks in charge.

    Why is the white Tower of London French and not English? Answer.

  • @hyurgy125mmmmmmmmmmmm

  • @hyurgy125 normans were just normans, no french nor anything else, why is the Tower of London french ? idk, i guess it was made by a french artist, why didnt the french accept Edward lll as new king of France, if you say the english got conquered and nobilty was french ? Answer.

  • @youkn0wme

    The black price was French in blood and culture, even his name was French, just shows how inferior you English really are lol.

  • @youkn0wme

    England doesn't even have it's own parliament unlike Wales and Scotland lol.

    Nice surrender at the Battle of Singapore, just shows how you Brits are when you don't have your allies doing all the warring for ya.

  • @hyurgy125 England had unity, unlike french, wich king couldnt even get out of Paris, fearing his own vassals who fought each other.

  • @youkn0wme i think cowards was n.1 anyway XD

  • @youkn0wme Che ridere voi inglesotti, non riuscite mai a vincere una guerra da soli e poi ingigantite le vostre battaglie vittoriose. Giusto in Africe e in India potevate avere un impero: in Europa vi hanno sempre fatto il culo ah ah ah ah ah ah Vive la France, W l'Allemagne

  • @Notteriva il culo ve l'hanno fatto i tedeschi nell ww2, e anche troppo bene! alla fine sono stati gli americani a salvarvi, che sono comunque di origini inglesi :D

  • @Balamutus3000 A noi hanno fatto il culo i tedeschi??? E gl'inglesi dov'erano???? ah ah ah ah... Allora gli inglesi son di origine francese perchè i normanni nel 1066 han conquistato la vostra isoletta :-).

  • @Notteriva è inutile continuare con sta cosa dei normani, se gli inglesi alla fine erano francesi che senso aveva fare la guerra dei 100 anni, anche gli americani sono discendenti dei inglesi, perche hanno combatuto la guerra di indipendenza allora ? dei inglesi volevano essere indipendenti dai inglesi ? le origini non contano!

  • The English lost Patay because of Talbot's rashness. Talbot wanted to face the French in a battle but Sir John Fastolf wanted to retreat and regroup (English reinforcements were 1 day's march away from joining up with Talbot). As Talbot's longbowmen were preparing for the battle the French cavelry caught them off guard and charged through them, killing hundreds. Fastolf realised the battle couldn't be won so he and a group of mounted men-at-arms fled the battle to report what happened to Bedford

  • Hundred Years war = French win

  • all the names u see in the end of that video r all mudering killers and butchers... there is no glory in war only DEATH!

  • also thats a movie i see a french soppose movie made in english can i ask who counquerd who? English speaking french actors seems england won in the end!

  • @slaneslau

    English is at least 40% romance,first english kings were french.

    You lost since the very beginning,anglo-saxon.

  • @StellandBlood Bullshit first English kings where Anglo-Saxons, figures. The first non-English kings were then Danish AKA Cnut the great, then came the NORMANS with William the Conqueror. Now before you call him French you do realize that he was a descendant of the Norwegian Viking Hrolfur called Rollon. The Normans were more powerful than the French as proven when William & the Normans slaughtered the French army in the BATAILLE DE VARAVILLE a few years before 1066.

  • @hyurgy125 At the time of the anglo-saxon kingdoms, England didn´t existed.

    Normans owed allegiance to the King of France,and the huge majority of the norman population consisted of gauls-romans-franks.

    Go see the mottos of the english royal family and many of the earlier english  houses,written in french,not anglo-saxon old english,a people oppressed and despised in the first centuries.

  • @StellandBlood

    The Anglo-Saxon king Eadred was the king of an unified kingdom of England in 946. Are you telling me that is a lie? And if yes come with a counter argument for it.

    The Normans in Normandy were completely independent from the Frankish kings as seen when the Frankish kings tried to invade Normandy they got destroyed as was the case with Louis d'outremer & Henri I

    NB please learn history, the term king of France did not exist until in the early 13th century.

  • @StellandBlood

    The Scandinavians settled in Neustria for over a century beginning settlements before 911 and continuing well into the reign of duke Richard II who's mother was Gunnora a Danish immigrant in Normandy.

    You forget to mention the Saxons of Neustria living there prior to the arrival of the Norse

    Google "toponymie normande" to see the huge Scandinavian influence in place names of Normandy far outdoing any Frankish influences, Franks being a minority in Gaul anyway.

  • he wasent the winner he was King when the war was over  thats all dont get them mixed up!

  • Fancy giving her maj a shiner! Shame on you.. So much for French chivalry, hmmm.

    But the fact remains that once the Tudors had unburdened themselves of their possessions in France, England went on to eclipse every other European power and spread her influence to the four corners of the world. She may still be suffering the symptoms of withdrawal from empire but we ain't dead yet, mon vieux. N'oubliez jamais Azincourt et ce dont nous sommes capables quand nous sommes coinces.

  • Comment removed

  • @Boleon05

    Boleon? Is that a diminutive for Na-Boleon? Now old Boney was a proper tyrant, after his disastrous adventure into Russia and the loss of a million men his arrogant comment was, "What are a million men compared to one such as I?". I suppose the answer is, "It depends if one of them is called Wellington". Au sujet de Dunkerque, j'avais l'impression que c'etait les Allemands qui etaient capables. Ils ont fait moins bien au dessus les champs d'Angleterre - Azincourt pour le Luftwaffe.

  • Comment removed

  • @TheRunereaper Et pourtant « tout soldat porte son bâton de maréchal dans sa giberne » Napoléon Bonaparte.Napoléon un tyran ? Il est vrai que la France était entourée de démocratie ! Ne tombez pas dans une approche manichéenne, cela vous perdra. Un despote éclairé par les idées de la révolution, ayant une haute idée de l'égalité. Égalité que l'armée consacra.

    Une pensée n'est pas faite pour être réduite à 4 lignes, si vous en voulez plus contactez moi.

  • The French soldiers were shit during the hundred years war. They were an undiciplined rabble at Crécy and Agincourt and they ran away like cowards at Poitiers and Verneuil.

  • @MultiAngryguy indeed. King Henry the V ftw!

  • à tester

  • test

  • test 

  • Comment removed

  • -Participe à la campagne de Guyenne, vainct avec Jean Bureau son vieil ennemi John Talbot à Castillon, ce dernier y trouvant la mort

    -Déchargé de son titre par Louis XI, il rejoint la Ligue du Bien Public, mais est finalement rétabli dans ses fonctions et entre dans l'Ordre de Saint-Michel

    -A 64 ans, défend Beauvais face aux Bourguignons de Charles le Téméraire aux côtés de Jeanne Hachette

    Je ne l'aurais pas mis à égalité avec Jeanne d'Arc ou Du Guesclin, mais c'est quand même quelqu'un !

  • André de Lohéac :

    -A 15 ans, combat et est fait chevalier à l'embuscade de la Brossinière

    -Défend Laval pendant 6 jours avec une centaine d'hommes avant de se rendre devant Talbot

    -Participe aux premières lignes aux batailles de Jargeau et de Patay aux côtés de Jeanne d'Arc

    -Amiral et maréchal de France par Charles VII

    -Se distingue à la reconquête de l'Ile-de-France et de la Normandie

    -Un des premiers commandants des compagnie d'ordonnance, la nouvelle armée nationale crée par le roi

  • Comment removed

  • Joan of Arc was a heretick, no woman should lead men in gods kingdom.

  • vidéo très sympa, y'a juste une petite erreur aux armoiries des combattants d'Orléans, le Prince Noir étant mort en 1376, il ne pouvait être au siège d'Orléans de 1429. Mais sinon j'adore!

  • LOL Talbot, Montaigu and Chandos are all French names too... They were really fighting their big brothers and lost to their elders. Shame. Imagine if that didn't happen, maybe the UK people today would embrace their Frenchness...

  • vive la france !!! sus a l'ennemi !

  • Muy buen video ! Vi esa película y es excelente.

    La guerra de los cien años es un tema interesante.

    Admiro a Juana de Arco, fue una gran heroína.

  • hahaha la photo de la reine d'angleterre à la fin!

  • @tounecaneton

    lol bien vu

  • @BleuroydeFrance

    Excellente image pratiquement "subjective" en effet ^^

    ahahahaha j'adore cet humour et cette video aussi au passage :-)

  • Video fantastique! Bien que j'aime tous les videos historiques, je prefere toujours celles qui montre l'origine des valeurs occidentales - comme les batailles du Moyens Age, quand on avait du courage et de l'honneur parmi tellement de difficultés et des obstacles incroyables, qui nous ne pourrons jamais imaginer... Donc, nous devrions tous être très fiers de nos ancêtres

  • EN FAVORIS ! j'adore, merci pour le pas vers ma chaine!

    Merci.

  • The french soldiers are better then english

  • @Notteriva Soldier for soldier I wouldn't have thought so, French armies are generally much larger than English.

  • @GodwinCarpenter Not at Formigny, Castillon and Patay.

    Sorry, I am italian and I can't write english :-(

  • @Notteriva Yeah at a few battles perhaps, but for the majority the English were outnumbered. And they were always outnumbered during campaignes.

  • @GodwinCarpenter Non è proprio così, anche se gli inglesi pensano solo ad Azancourt. In ogni caso i britannici han sempre avuto il gusto di fare i grandi soldati col sangue degli altri: Waterloo dice tutto ( i britannici erano 20% dei soldati).

    In ogni caso la Guerra dei cent'anni sembra una sequenza di vittorie inglesi...come mai han perso la guerra?

  • @Notteriva Sorry I don't understand?

  • @Notteriva and your a tosser.

  • @crazyh1997 e tu un pirla

  • @Notteriva Cool blud, go eat sum fucking snails you hairy bastard

  • @crazyh1997 tua madre è una gran troia

  • @Notteriva Fuck u u ugly piece of shit come to Lonon n then we'll see if ur a big man u fucking pasta making prick

  • @crazyh1997 sprofonda nella merda dove sei nato.

  • @Notteriva Yh yh speak in english so i know what your sayin, pussyhole

  • @crazyh1997 Anche se sei un ignorante coglione credo che tu capisca lo stesso. Impara l'Italiano.

  • @Notteriva Yeah, fucking pussy

  • @crazyh1997 figlio di una cagna

  • @Notteriva Thats why 14,000 were killed at Agincourt and 112 English were:P

  • @theathiestalaby Not 14.000, but 5.000. Patay: inglesi fuggono come topi :-)

  • @Notteriva hehe, Look it up, both French and English historians both agree it was 14,00. Now, my child, search it up ;)

  • @theathiestalaby Bel figlio ah ah ah....

  • @theathiestalaby

    Mmhhh i've never seen 14 000 deaths , most common numbers who are often mentioned is 8000 .

  • @Notteriva Yes the English fight and in the main WIN, lol. How was your second world war when we were free, lol. Oh you were getting your arses raped by the Nazis. Pity it took those crap English People to free you!!!

  • @dubbsy69 E Dunkerke???? Ah ah ah ah ah. Gli americani e i russi han salvato anche voi, poveretti. Sempre salvati dagli altri ah ah ah ah ah

  • @dubbsy69

    It took 22 Mil soviets,french resistance,and the allied army also consisted of hundreds of thousands of french,that distinguished themselves as the most fanatic allied troops.

  • @Notteriva

    German soldiers are better than French soldiers.

  • @hyurgy125

    Not historically.

  • @Notteriva 5 french are not worth 1 english... (Battle of Agincourt)

  • @Balamutus3000 10 english are not worth 1 french... (Battle of Patay)

  • @Notteriva english just were caught unprepared, it wasnt a fight, french just folowed and killed routing units, it happens in abscence of leader, considering all the victorys english achieved over the french, the english are the true winners of the war. au revoir mon ami

  • @Balamutus3000 ah ah ah ah e in che film l'hai visto? Ad Azincourt i francesi sono stati coraggiosi; a Patay gl'inglesi sono fuggiti...adieu mon ennemi

  • @Notteriva io direi che i francesi non sapevano cosa li aspetava, non che erano coragiosi, erano semplicemente sicuri di vincere, gli inglesi saran fugiti a Patay ma hanno combatuto Agincourt, Crecy, Poitiers, Sluys, Auberoche, Fresnay. e altri. e non credo ci sia un film con la bataglia di Patay, e comunque non e un gran che di vittoria, qualunque cavaleria pesante avrebbe otenuto lo stesso risultato.ma devi avere veramente le palle a stare davanti a un esercito 5 volte piu grande che ti carica

  • @Balamutus3000 Ah giusto! Se non c'è un film allora la battaglia non vale...ah ah ah ah ah ah. I francesi han vinto a Castillon, Patay, Cocherel, Formigny, La Rochelle, Baugè. Gli inglesi in tutte le epoche vengono sempre salvati dagli altri.

  • @Notteriva quello che ho detto era ben chiaro, semplicemente vuoi fare il coglione, non si guardano i film per imparare storia, i film sono per intratenimento.Francia ha perso la guerra, e la morte di Henry v che ha permesso ai francesi di riprendersi, se no sarebbe diventato re di Inghiltera e di Francia. e visto che ancora non ci arivi, la storia ricorda solo le GRANDI bataglie, quelle che introducono nuove strategie. l' ultima frase l'hai proprio sparata... mi viene in mente france nel ww2 XD

  • @Balamutus3000 La Francia ha perso la guerra? Ah sì? Credevo che gli inglesi se ne fossero tornati sulla loro isoletta con la coda tra le gambe eh eh eh :-). Nella ww2 i tedeschi han fatto il culo pure a voi inglesotti (Dunquerque), ma come sempre trasformate sui libri le più vergognose sconfitte in trionfi :-). Grandi battaglie con nuove strategie? Bene, a Castillon i francesi han messo in campo l'artiglieria e vi han fatto il culo :-)

  • @Notteriva almeno gli inglesi la ww2 l'hanno combatuta, a diferenza dei francesi, tutto somato i francesi hanno perso la guerra,pensa se anche gli inglesi avevano una popolazione di 22 millioni nvece di 6 :) vi facevano il culo nel giro di un anno.Gli inglesi hanno messo in campo l'artiglieria 100 anni prima XD a Crecy, copioni,

  • @Balamutus3000 A crecy l'artiglieria NON è stata decisiva. A Castillon e Formigny sì. Inoltre. La 2WW gl'inglesi l'hanno combattuta perchè avevano la Manica tra loro e i tedeschi, altrimenti la svastica sarebbe apparsa sulla Torre di Londra. Per quanto riguarda le origini: sei tu che le hai tirate fuori, bambinetto. I britannici hanno sempre contato sugli altri e i vostri storici si affannano a raccontarvi un sacco di palle sul vostro valore. Apri gli occhi e vergognati :-)

  • @Notteriva guarda che sei tu che ai tirato fuori le robe con le origini dicendo che i normani che erano francesi hanno conquistato l'Inghiltera, ti consiglio di rilegere quello che scrivi e se ci riesci magari anche pensare. non serve piu parlare della ww2, mi sono fatto un idea della tua conoscienza, e dicevi che a noi racontano palle eh ? e a voi cosa racontano ? cazzi ? quando si parla di "potenza di fuoco" direi che tute le armi a distanza sono in qualche modo decisive

  • @Balamutus3000 No caro inglesotto, tu hai detto che gli americani sono inglesi :-). Inoltre è verissimo che i tedeschi, sul campo, vi han regolamente fatto il culo e senza USA e Russia oggi parlereste tedesco. Inoltre un conto è avere sul campo due cannoni, un altro averne dieci o venti. Ma cosa parlo a fare con te che leggi solo la storia manipolata...

  • @Balamutus3000 Listen me,shitalian asshole:shut-up and eat your pasta!

    We,French,won the hundred years war.You are just ashamed,because clodewig has expelled your ancestors from France(the romans).And longbards finished the works(470).

    Long live celts and germans!

  • @Notteriva 1 funny thing, google "french are " and see the sugestions :D

    and spacebar after "are"

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more