he delivered message to whom......? germans thats he can fight or for russians as a treat........and what is he saying from 1:50 to 2:07 can anybody explain..........plz....!!
@rahulrathode he says instead of cows they lined up russian soldiers made them lock arms and walk through a mine field while pointing machine guns at them to get them to walk. THEN the soldiers die by stepping on the mines . SO WHEN no cows are around they use thier own men on a suicide mission
War was declare from juda because germany have 1933 do what in israel of today is the normalst thing or want they germans in their government and financialsystem ?
@bh5496 You don't know ABSOLUTELY SHIT of what you're talking about. Stalingrad had no military advantage?? You retard. It was the TURNING POINT of WW2. Experts say Germany would have won the war had Stalingrad been taken (it was rich in oil resources Germany desperately needed). Go watch the documentary "The battle of Stalingrad", it's on youtube. Hitler's plan was BRILLIANT. The Germans only lost because the foolish and unprepared ITALIAN and ROMANIAN divisions screwed up and got them trapped.
@fuckoff989 LOL! What???! You are crazy friend, that or have been badly misinformed. Stalingrad is just a top 3 in a long list of blunders the fool corporal made! Stalingrad had no oil, the fields to the south around Grozny and such. Stalingrad was a complete waste and worse a terrible terrible example of just asking for defeat! If Operation blue was kept as it first was intended (again Hitler interfering) the city might have been taken early on.
@lonewulf44 How did stalingrad have no oil you retard? Stalingrad was THE KEY to deny Russia its own resources and keep Germany filled and strong. Please stop vomiting that ignorance of yours, I hate repeating myself. Go watch the documentary "The battle of Stalingrad" EVERY goddamn expert admits Germany would have won the war HANDS DOWN had Stalingrad been taken. Your stupid brainwashed opinion means little compared to undeniable facts.
@fuckoff989 Lol, I almost want to sigh and shake my head that somehow there are still people who try to back or worship that fool dictator and his absolutely terrible military (let alone domestic and economic and diplomatic) decisions. Stalingrad was central for Volga traffic and goods around it, but it was not the goal for specific oil fields.
@fuckoff989 As for denying Russia these resources , taking the city would have done that. But, that was already accomplished by just the strategic position Operation Blue ended up putting German forces. Of course that ignores the fact that Hitler interference with Op. Blau to begin with as the city could have been easily taken. It was Hitlers moronic insistence to grind up his ground forces in a stupid urban hellhole and wast precious armored forced while inviting soviet counter attacks
@lonewulf44 Hitler snatched defeat from the jaws of victory? O really? And who took Germany to "the jaws of victory" in the first place, you brainless retard? Hitler SINGLE HANDEDLY conquered Europe almost entirely (unlike Napoleon who made his opponents quit out of fear, without having to fight). The world had to LITERALLY UNITE to take him on and even still, almost lost. It was said for many years that the Waffen-SS was an undefeatable force. Now who created the Waffen-SS in the first place?
@fuckoff989 LOL, again ... almost funny and sad how you have nothing right. The fact is , the moron Hitler UNITED that world around him with he stupid actions! He DoW on the US for no GAIN! He invaded USSR and CREATED a two front war! German gains over Poland and France were entirely to the credit of the German General staff , not the bungling fool Hitler! And France specifically contains his only wise decision of the entire post 1939 era when he used Manstein's ardennes plans.
@fuckoff989 oh yeah, napoleon NEEEEEVER went to the front line. he just sat back at his desk in berlin making dumb millitary decisions without truely understanding the full scope of the situato... oh wait, you dumbasss, that was hitler.
@bh5496 Ask his opponent what they say bout Nap. Wellington famously said he was worth 40,000 men on the field didn't he? Pretty sure everyone agrees that Hitler's bungling decision HELPED his enemy. Some of his choices erupting entire fronts, lost entire ARMIES, handicapped entire strategic situations, and managed to ruin technological possibilities by moronic ideology. Comparing the fool corporal with Bonaparte must make the emperor roll over in his grave with shame.
@bh5496 Hitler didn't need to go to the front you retard. There were better forms of communication. If Napoleon could, he would have stayed away from the front line as well you dumb shit. What would be the point of Hitler being in the front line? First of all, there were several fronts, meaning he couldn't have controlled all of them if he choose to go to one. And yes, it makes complete sense that Hitler targeted British civilians after the British targeted Germans. A taste of the same medicine.
@fuckoff989 no it doesn't in ANY tactical sence. he had the RAF ON THE ROPES, then a few bombs fall on berlin( the RAF was retaliating to an accidental bombing on London made by some lost Jerry pilots) and then he decides to bomb british cities, giving the RAF needed breathing room to rebuild and overcome the germans. and my sarcasm about the front was in response to your idiotic statement that "Napoleon who made his opponents quit out of fear, without having to fight"
@bh5496 Which part of "THE BRITISH, NOT THE GERMANS, started bombing civilians" didn't you understand? And RAF never "overcame" the Germans. Hitler had Britain on its knees before the Americans came in. And yes, Napoleon DID NOT conquer most of the territories he occupied you dumb piece of shit. Go study some history. Countries such as Spain openly surrendered to Napoleon because they were scared of his army. Hitler on the other hand, had to fight each one of the countries he occupied.
@fuckoff989 the british were the first to start bombing INTENTIONALY, but it was in response to bombs that fell on London when a german bomber flight UNINTENTIONALY dropped their bombs on London. you boob, napoleon lured the king of spain into france, arrested him, and forced a surrender, BUT most of the Spanish armies and civilians continued open geurilla warfare with the british and portuguese against the french. causing a long, drawn out war in the spanish peninsula.
@bh5496 Rofl now you are making up history. Which is obvious as you are American so you don't know shit about the world. NEVER did I hear about Spain's king being "lured and arrested by Napoleon" haha. You're SO ignorant. And what evidence do you have of the German "unintentional bombing of London"? Because I have plenty of evidence of British INTENTIONAL bombing of German civilians. And America was a problem to Hitler since the START, constantly giving Britain all types of essential support.
@fuckoff989 i'm making nup history? says the guy who said hitler made no mistakes and denotes his generals' abilities to just being pawns of that bafoon? in more detail, Charles IV, already largly unpopular, was pressured into abdicating his throne in favor of his son Ferdinand in 1808. but Charles later retracted his abdication in favor of Napy's brother Joseph Bonaparte. although Joseph technically was king, most spanish didn't approve and still considered Ferdinand as right king.
@bh5496 Please tll me when did I EVER say Hitler made no mistakes you idiot? Hitler did make mistakes. He wouldn't be human if he didn't. But that does NOT change what he, ALONE, accomplished . Which was far greater than Napoleon. Am I "denoting Hitler's generals to being nothing but pawns?" Have you even read how Hitler's generals described his genius after the war? They said it THEMSELVES they were nothing but PUPILS compared to Hitler's immeasurable war knowledge and genius. Do your research.
@fuckoff989 "a military genius. So if HE was a genius, then why wasn't Hitler? What's the difference? Oh yeah right, the difference is that when Napoleon lost, the All-lies weren't around to write history, you see? Besides, Hitler didn't make a single mistake." these are your words good sir; please note THE LAST SENTENCE! yes hitler did do much for german economy & morale, at the expence of jews, communists ect. of course, and some victories credible to him, but MANY more stupid losses.
@bh5496 Theoretically it is arguable Hitler didn't make mistakes considering the things that went wrong, could not be predicted by anyone and his plans would have worked under normal conditions. Judging from an outside historical perspective though you may say he made mistakes because for whatever reason things didn't go as planned. That's what I meant. His losses were not "stupid" you retard. Nobody in the world would have single handedly accomplished half of what he did.
@bh5496 Stop belittling the history's most brilliant general, you filthy jew. How did Hitler accomplish things "at the expense of jews and communists"?? Hitler SAVED Germany from these people. Germany would have rotten in hell if the communists took power. You are nothing but a blind hater too jealous and dumb to admit respect the legend of Adolf Hitler. Hitler declared war on America because it was clear sooner or later USA would declare war on Germany for no reason (like it happened in WW1)
@fuckoff989 one minor reason why america declared war on germany during the great was was because of the Lucitania, but the BIG reason was because they'd descovered an elleged plot made by germany for mexico to attack america.
@fuckoff989 hahahahahahahaha all you neo nazis are all alike! anyone who disagrees with hitler in you guys' minds is always automatically either a "filthy JEEEEEW" or bolshevik/commie whatever. say what you want but i am not nor will i ever be either of said things. this comment says i all, you are just some pathetic neo nazi wishing for hitler to return from the grave so y'all can relive the glory days of the 1930's. no sir, you are the "blind hater" along with every other nazi who ever lived.
@fuckoff989 the allies could have attempted to kill hitler at one point but realized he'd lose the war faster than they could win it, and they were right. if anything hitler was an ok politician but not a military genious. things ALL went down hill faster than before the moment he took absolute control of the military.
@bh5496 the plan was that after Germany declared war on USA, Japan would in exchange and declare war on the Soviet Union.Russia would be invaded by Japan from the South and it wouldn't be able to handle two fronts (like Hitler did btw).Russia would be defeated in a matter of months. Then it would be USA vs a wounded Germany which would STILL have been enough to kick the Americans' ass with Hitler in command. He declared war on USA because he was sure he could beat them if things went as planned.
@fuckoff989 just because he didn't know his mistakes were mistakes doesn't mean they aren't mistakes, THEY STILL ARE. and yes, many of his losses WERE quite stupid, example: not letting the army withdraw from Stalingrad when they were about to be cut of AND not giving them permission to break out when they were was quite unwise. and mabe before hastily declaring war on US he should have, gee i dunno, waited until japan declared war on russia so his plan would be foolproof.
@bh5496 Again you are making up stupid facts because you don't know shit about what happened. America declared war on Germany in WW1 because the JEWS who run America forced it too, THAT was the whole reason the Germans hated Jews in the first place you idiot. Go read about the Stab-in-the-back legend. The Nazis hated Jews so much because they sold and betrayed Germany making an agreement with the British that USA would be brought to war with Germany if England gave them Palestine.
@fuckoff989 yeah yeah, jew conspiracy blah blah blah, trying to take over world blah blah blah. uh huh i've heard it all before. your recent comments prove it all, you're just some sad neo nazi with a Hitler-ized view of history and the world. therefor you are nothing more than a waste of time and a human life and chances are this is my last comment to you because you are utterly pointless. so, good day sir, and good riddance.
@ZehqMW: He relished the opertunity to openly attack our supply ships going to Britain & Russia. He thought his submarines could cut off the supply route. Damn near right too.
@bh5496 Like I said, it DOESN'T matter if Hitler made mistakes. The most brilliant geniuses in history all made mistakes. They were HUMAN. That doesn't lower the merit of what he accomplished. His losses were NOT stupid, stop talking shit of stuff you know nothing about. He didn't allow troops to fall-back because that meant the war was already LOST. Germany NEEDED to take over Stalingrad's resources in order to continue the war. Without Stalingrad it was useless to fall back. The war was lost.
@fuckoff989 Dude, that isnt quite right. Hitler blew it at Stalingrad because he persecuted a non-strategic battle that was to break the will of the Soviet Union...Stalin's city, etc. The resources were to the south, he could have copped those resources without taking Stalingrad. However, had Stalingrad fallen then the fight wud probably have been knocked out of the Russians, & Stalin himself wud have had to concede there was no stopping the German armies on Soviet soil.
@fuckoff989 However, u are right that Hitler was mostly genius, he certainly was not an idiot. But he wasn't a great military tactician, and he was given to bouts of changing his mind right at conclusive moments during the war years. Probably his biggest mistake was at Kursk, 1943, he held back many divisions "in reserve" when if they'd have been committed, maybe the Red Army would have been defeated. Difficult to say, we can all be armchair Generals with 20/20 hindsight.
@RepublicanNatio The Battle of Kursk was never actually truly 'won'. It was similar to Battle of Britain, in that Hitler just decided to pull back from the fighting (on the basis that his losses were getting too high). But there's still many debates that argue had Hitler thrown in everything & kept attacking then maybe the Russians would have been beaten there. The Ruskies had far heavier casualties than the Germans did at Kursk. One thing 4sure, Kursk was the most epic battle of modern warfare.
@keysphilip: In the end, what Russia & Germany HAD were their people. From this testimony we can see the Stalin didn't care about wasting his men. Such suicide squads were common on the Soviet side. You tell a man that his wife & children will be sent to a concentration camp if they don't do the suicide mission, they usually did it. If Hitler sent every person in Germany in to Kursk, Stalin would have just kept matching him until every last German was dead.
@VictorLepanto Well, yes I think you're right. Its frightening to think how these two singular minded dictators would sacrifice every last person in their country, without remorse or care for human life. It is however a testament to Soviet peoples that they managed to 'arm up' their war machine in 1942-43 with thousands of tanks & planes to have the armour to match, & then finally over turn,Germany's huge initial advantage. Stuff like the T-34 tank was a 'war winner' in the final WW2 assessment.
@keysphilip: That & Hitler's bolluxing his own troops by insistining operationally useless developements, like ever larger tanks which were heavy & over complex & thus of little value in real combat. Take the American vs. German tank situation. A single German tank was effective against 3 U.S. tanks. The thing is we outproduced them at about 4 to 1, thus the 4th tank always took out the German tank.
@VictorLepanto Adolf sure led the German war machine on some dead end paths. But all ways you look at it, the Germans just got worn down by being outnumbered, and the incompetence of their so-called allies. I feel sorry for the German wehrmacht soldiers, they were brave & honorable troops. They got the shit end of the stick and died fighting for an ideology that wasn't even their own belief/s.
@keysphilip: In the end, the German troops were just stalling for time. They tried to evacuate as many Germans as possible from the East. They knew what kind of vengeful storm was coming. I think it was one of the great mistakes of history that the allies declined to take Berlin. We;d have a much easier post-war/Cold War era if we had. I blame it on the Democrats for putting up an obviously unfit FDR merely to retain power.
@VictorLepanto As from what I understood, the Allies had already promised Stalin that the Red Army cud make the 'coup de gras' on the Nazi Capitol & take the Reichstag, which in fairness to USSR's horrendous losses in the war on the Eastern Front they had 'earned' that right.
@keysphilip: A little known fact, @ the Tehran & Yalta conferences, FDR's chief adviser was Alger Hiss. FDR was so sick that he could only function for a few hours a day. He was observed to be drifting off & not following during the long sessions. He was really half dead already. He was just being used as a puppet by Hiss & other Soviet agents who'd infiltrated his gov't.
@VictorLepanto I didnt know that, but it makes sense, FDR was indeed very ill at that time. It makes one think how things may have been arranged differently if Truman had come in a year earlier.
@keysphilip: I think that Henry Wallace was still VP then. Wallace was replaced by a coalition of Southern segregationists, who wanted a less radical man in the White House. Wallace ran as a 3rd party candidate against Truman under the Progressive Party. A party which was run as a front by the communists. I don't think Wallace was consciously suportive of the communists. Just a typical useful idiot lefty liberal.
@VictorLepanto I wonder if Winston Churchill was aware(or felt) any of this going on? Not that he could have influenced it any differently. USA & USSR held all the cards. They had 'beaten' Germany,the part that us Brits played was superficial in the overall big picture. 1940 Battle of Britain was an important early event, of course,but in truth Hitler just redirected his focus to the plans for Russia in 1941. If he'd pursued the attack on UK,Germany would have taken Britain within 6 more months.
@keysphilip: It was Churchill's holding out in the Battle of Britain period that made a final victory over Hitler possible. W/o Churchill, Hitler would have won WWII. It is that simple in my book.
Churchill didn't attend FDR's funeral, some think this might have been reflection of his treatment @ the Tehran & Yalta conferences. FDR went out of his way to snub Churchill in those places. FDR actually stayed in the Soviet embassy in Tehran!
@VictorLepanto As a proud Brit, I of course dont underrate the Battle of Britain; indeed it was crucial to the future of the war, vital that Germany did not take the UK in 1940. But the reality is that Hitler suspended that battle, he didn't 'lose' it, in the general sense of the word. There are many facets of the B.o.B that played in the advantage of the RAF, but nothing can take away the amazing courage & skill of the 'Few' RAF pilots who fought the mighty Luftwaffe in the Summer of 1940.
@keysphilip: It is certainly true that Hitler was driven by his racist ideology to turn from the British to the Russians. All that lebensraum nonsense. I still think that action only brought about more quickly what would have occured otherwise.
I doubt if FDR would have allowed a final defeat of Britain. Certainly Canada & the Anzac forces wouldn't have abandoned Britain. If Hitler had attempted an amphibious assault, it would have been worse then Stalingrad for him.
@VictorLepanto It was kinda strange how the Germans had the fleeing Brits pinned down at Dunkirk before so many escaped across the channel back to England - and it seemed the Germans almost gave them time to escape (another Adolf mistake perhapd?) Indeed Adolf wasn't big on navy or water borne assaults. I wonder why he didnt push for heavy bombers (as RAF & USAF were so focused to do), the luftwaffe was strong yet lacked a real 'city flattening' capability.
@keysphilip: Goring promised Hitler he could easily wipeout the troops at Dunkirk from the air. This was hardly the last time Goring promised an easy air victory & couldn't deliver. It is actually a shame Hitler didn't attempt a crossing, he'd have done it in force & not like the Dieppe raid. France could then have more easily been retaken.
@VictorLepanto Goering was indeed a failure, hardly in the same league as Rommel or Guderian. Hitler had some clowns around him, & appeared to listen more to these invertebrates than the good aides he had on side. The Third Reich perhaps had no chance from the beginning when u look at the quality (& concepts) of some of Adolfs inner circle! But Hitler had the drive & energy to inspire the people, for that alone I guess he earned the right to lead it, such as 'it' was.
@keysphilip: If France had effective leadership at the moment it was needed, they wouldn't have been overrun. Hitler woud have found himself in the same predicament was 1914 & the general would have moved to blow him up in a more timely fashion. This speculation of course, but I think it sound.
@VictorLepanto But was France capable in 1939 of resisting such a mass of troops & armour? I feel that the main 'failure' of the Allies came in the 1936-39 period, as they just looked-on. almost impotent, as Germany became a Superpower.
If WW2 showed anything, it perhaps underlined the importance of having the right allies. Hitler's 'axis' was pretty poor in comparison to the German forces.Albeit I guess the Germans didnt show their allies much respect anyway, even before the collapse started.
@keysphilip: In many ways, the French military was superior to the German. Certainly in terms of equipment. My understaning is that the general commanding French forces was suffering from some aspects of dimentia from syphilis. Then we can talk about the politics. The French left has long taken credit for being the leading lights of ther resistance. Actually, the communist resisted the war then b/c of Stalin's orders. The indepdent left wasn't much better.
@VictorLepanto I guess that the French Resistance was pretty effective, through its own weapons as much as those supplied to it. As I read, the FR was made up of large numbers, albeit they were careful how many were utilised in action. Brave guys (& girls), u didn't want to be captured alive by the SS in France. It must have been terrible to be in an underground movement, knowing the consequences of capture. Heroes to a man/woman.
@keysphilip The French in 1940 when the Germans invaded France were on the whole a stronger force, the main reason they were defeated was because of poor deployment and tactics which allowed them to be surrounded and destroyed relatively easily.
@VictorLepanto BE GLAD WE DIDNT take berlin .. WE fucked the russians hard core!! we gave them that victory and then granted them the rights to the lands (that they just took and felt was theirs. ) WHILE AMERICA got the top nazi scientist and all the technology ( NASA founder ALL our aerospace technology and etc ... LOOK WHO IS THE MAN NOW ! WE GOT ALL THE technology so we are the most powerful nation >> WISH they could go back NOW Russia?
@bh5496 and Hitler DID handle 2 fronts at the same time for most of the war you ignorant fool. Even the documentaries made by the All-lies admit Hitler had the Soviet Union AND England in their knees at one point in the war. Not to mention the countries he had already DEFEATED like France, Netherlands, Belgium, Greece, Norway, etc. If you are too stupid or too proud to admit the genius in that, then this debate is useless. You are like a horse that only looks forward.
@fuckoff989 btw, if by "(like Hitler did btw)" you are implying that hitler did handle a 2 front war, no he didn't, that's another reason why he lost, because he was squished between the vice of the allies from the west and soviets from the east.
@lonewulf44 Just look at what you're saying you moron, you are indirectly calling yourself stupid without even realizing it. You just said Nazi Germany was the greatest military force yet seen. Now, WHO created that military force you irrational dipshit? It was Hitler ALONE. From the first to the last bit of it. When Hitler got to power years after WW1, Germany was a piece of shit country that didn't even have a military. Hitler single handedly took it to become the greatest power ever seen.
@fuckoff989 Wrong again I'm afraid. The German war machine was 'great' due to its collection of both the most skilled and qualified command officers on the general staff, a simple but masterful NCO organization and objective structure, and of course a manpower to drawn on that has a heritage like none other. Hitler had ZERO to do with that ...and its only when the madman INTERFERES with that does bad things happen! Correction, plenty of his decision cause bad things outside of the military2
@lonewulf44 "To a degree which is almost incomprehensible, Hitler had studied general staff publications, military literature, essays on tactics, operations and strategy and he had a knowledge in the military fields which can only be called amazing. Hitler was so well informed concerning, armament, leadership and equipment of all armies and all navies of the globe that it was impossible to prove any error on his part. (...) Only a genius can do that. (...) I was the pupil and not the master."
@fuckoff989 Hmmm, then how do you explain his outrageous mistakes! Leaving the BEF at Dunkirk? Pushing the Me-262 fighter away? DoW on the USA, entire Operation Citadel? Political cronies kept, Failure to easily take Eygpt, The Ukrainian pocket mistake, wasteful wartime racial policies, ... and on and on.
@lonewulf44 I dunno .... Hitler made many mistakes and missed many opportunities... i think his greatest mistake was declaring war on the USA and not pushing Japan harder into opening a front with the Russians
@ADZ01982 Well, he's too many mistakes and terrible blunders are almost too numerous to count but that's a big one. He was already in a mess at 12-41 but he had not slammed close the window of victory yet. He's already willingly opened a massive 2 front war, diverted Army Group Cen away from Moscow thereby losing it, and chased away millions of willing fighters and allies by his brutality of the Eastern soviet populations. DoW on US was just the cherry on top of stupidity, but not the last
@ADZ01982 Pushing hard doesn't begin to come close to it, he should have SECURED Japanese entry or help before offering an entire DoW! It makes absolutely zero ... no scratch that ... negative sense to bring about such events. He seems habitually incapable of make wise choices and as they stack up over the years ... your left astonished that some high ranking mil. officer just didn't put a bullet into his chest and know that the reichstag janitor could replace him and still be better off
@Andrew598895 You missed my entire point, Hitler was another briefly successful politician. If you think about it, he was weirdly emotional, everything he did was emotive, he hated this group or that, say Slavs - so attempted to destroy them etc. He was an adult with child tantrum complex. And his CoC military strategy reflected this, it was not systematic, but had emotive vengeful turns, otherwise he would have tactically withdrawn in many instances, Stalingrad the best example.
@100milnic Indeed, he lost the entire 6th Army there.And yet they could have been saved had he trusted his Field Martial Manstein. According to him, he would not see reason in so many instances, and Stalingrad was for vengeance and status more than military advantage.Germany had the best trained military in the world in that time period.Had there been a commander instead of Hitler wearing two hats - Germany would have won, but Hitler trusted no one.
@Andrew598895 Kursk was the end of wehremact offensive, was obvious & overly delayed campaign that let soviets prepare colossal defense in depth. But even in victory Hitler made big errors, ie halting the panzers before Dunkirk to allow the British to escape. But key thing is he was politician not trained staff officer, once fully in charge he was constantly diluting power of his striking forces for mixed & changing goals & was far too profligate with his most valuable forces, ie at Stalingrad
@Andrew598895 No in truth Hitler was distasterous military leader, his early success was based on political pressure not military strategy, ie march into Rhur, Sudentland & Austria. Victory over France came from Manstien's plan & Hitler stole credit for it. After assuming full control Hitler's decisions were mostly poor, as he had limited understanding of support logistics & worse had little concern for casualties. He was an ambitious politician not a military leader. The USSR gamble showed it.
History is written by the victor ... I do not support Hitler ideas , instead I hate them , however according to the way things turned out , the Allies made everyone think that the Germans / Japanese are bad and monstrous ... That is not right . We cannot blame these days the Germans as cruel because of the past . In my opinion it is the goverment that always creates the war , not the people . In all of our history only the flags changed , not the wars
Stop claiming that Stalin and Hitler were stupid or were amateur commanders. Both served in war and did outstandingly as soldiers and junior military commanders. It becomes extreme pressure to lead millions when the whole world falls on your shoulders and you make mistakes. Admittedly, some German and Soviet generals were more strategically genius then their leaders, but nonetheless both commanders were geniuses of their time. Cunning, deceitful, spiteful, intelligent, wise and true-born leaders
@nloladze hitler was great untill he got into those drugs, morphine was it? the drugs and his various personal mental issues are what fucked him over.
If you had taken Stalin and the Russian army and put them in France in 1940 they would have got steamrolled like the French did. The size of Russia saved their ass
The Russians won because of numbers of men allowing the to absorb HUGE casualties, and the ability to retreat over an endless land mass, the T-34 tank, and the weather...which was compounded by Hitler attacking to late.....and Hitler's insanely bad meddling in tactics.
In 1942 two amateur commanders (Hitler and Stalin) had command of the two most powerful armies that had ever been assembled for war.
In all honestly it was one of the greatest tragedies in human history, The Russian and German suffering there was simply a grim testament to the unyielding need for humans to kill each other en masse.
@allinaday Hitler and Stalin not only were amateur - but their amateur experience was based on a totally different type of warfare and neither understood mobility. At least Stalin after the defeats of 1941 was able to take advice which Hitler increasingly frequently refused.
@14BeProud haha Hitler was a amateur commander? lmao. His generals described him in the Nuremberg trials as a military genius. They said he would spend every single night studying hundreds of books from different Generals. They said his knowledge about war was so deep and his tactics and plans were so well elaborated it was almost impossible to point out a single mistake. If the German military was powerful and achieved so much, it was ALL, I repeat, ALLLL because of Hitler. Gtfo, ignorant fool.
Hitler was somewhat well read in military Doctrine (especially that of Frederick The Great and Napoleon) as far as theory was concerned.
Von Manstein, Guderian, Rommel, and many others made a point to disagree with Hitler's overbearing strategic control of the eastern front. At the end of the day, Hitler had the formal military prowess of a corporal. Nothing less. For that is what he was.
@14BeProud QUOTE: "To a degree which is almost incomprehensible, Hitler had studied general staff publications, military literature, essays on tactics, operations and strategy and... he had a knowledge in the military fields which can only be called amazing... Hitler was so well informed concerning, armament, leadership and equipment of all armies and... all navies of the globe that it was impossible to prove any error on his part...Hitler studied at night all the big general staff books by (..)
@14BeProud (...) Moltke, Schieffen and Clausewitz...Therefore we had the impression: Only a genius can do that...even in the simple everyday questions concerning organization and equipment of the Wehrmacht ... I was the pupil and not the master... " - by Wilhelm Keitel, the head of Supreme Command of the Armed Forces." - That's the testimony from one of the heads of the Nazi army. THOSE are facts. The load of diarrhea that's coming out of your mouth is nothing but your mere ignorant speculation.
@14BeProud ... but the FACT is Adolf Hitler WAS a military genius, bigger than Napoleon. After WW2 the Allies tried to kill his legend in every possible way with bullshit lies like claiming he was incompetent and stupid and didn't know anything about war and should have listened to his generals. Which is exactly the opposite of what he was. But you see, brainless retards like you believe all their crap without questioning. I've shown you facts right there, now YOU show me your facts, dumb fuck.
@fuckoff989 Coporal Adolph,a military genius??How silly.Read more detail,the classic "RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD RIECH" by William Shrier,published right after the war,and HIGHLY detailed,ought to set u straighter on the military prowess of Hitler.'The German Generals"is another that wiill debunk your genius theory
@dempsey981 You have absolutely no idea of what your talking about. I can't believe your actually recommending me PROPAGANDA books. Go read the REAL history, retard. I just presented a quote from a top German general. And that's one of many. Hitler was in charge of every advance, every tactic, every strategy, every weapon, every decision the German army took. That means EVERY SINGLE THING Germany achieved during WW2 (conquering France, etc.) it's Hitler's merit whether you wanna admit it or not.
@fuckoff989 you tickle me,i rarely see people as wrong as you speak with such false confidence.i think you sit down and write these stupid posts of yours while drinking cheap generic whiskey.i'd argue with you,and it would be a cinch,but you're not worth it.I will say this,if he was such a military einstein why did he make soooo many countless mistakes,which resulted in GERMANY BEING BOMBED LITERALLY INTO THE FUCKING STONE AGE?Normally rational people associate "genius" with better results.
@dempsey981 If your intelligence and your knowledge were half as big as your ignorant mouth, you would have already won this debate. I simply LOVE it who you keep whining I'm wrong but yet you haven't pointed out a single mistake, have you? You haven't countered a single one of my facts. Hitler made mistakes? Yep. Napoleon Bonaparte made mistakes. Mistakes which resulted in France losing all its colonies, an economic recession and complete destruction of France. Yet they call him (...)
@fuckoff989 stalingrad was an excellent example of hitlers genius,operation BARBAROSSA.This was by far the greatest holocaust german defeat in german history[look it up loud mouth bitch].the trained german general staff was ignored repeatedly,and subordinate to hitlers authority.now the end result is clearly obvious total catastrophic failure.not an outcome we associate with genius.yer a lot of rant and no substance the kind of cunt i normally just bitch slap on site.nazi sympathizer shit of bag
@dempsey981 Getting a little bit mad there, bro? Relax... It's okay to be ignorant. You claim Hitler wasn't a genius because ONE of his plans failed? hahaha how about the successful victories over Poland, Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg, Belgium, Holland, FRANCE, Monaco, Yugoslavia, Greece, Lithuania, Danzig, Latvia, Estonia, and even a VAST territory of Russia. Even the British admit London was 2 hours away from defeat before the United States planes arrived. Who achieved all of that? Hitler.
@fuckoff989 well you got me im out brained,i admitt it,anyone who can over runmega states latvia and estonia,AND MASSIVE MONACO[all 10 sq.meters of it]dynamic norway pop.1.5 million back then,most certainly is beyond ANY doubt, the successor to Hannibal,and in fact a military genius.ill bet he was quite surprised when his devine, genius inspired 1000 YEAR RIECH lasted a grand total of roughly 12 lousy years!Thats about 1 third the time it took to rebuild germany.yup what a genius!!!seig heil
@fuckoff989 man your view of Hitler's military thinking is totaly sugar coated. yes he made many victories IN THE EARLY WAR, but then for some reason or another, be it the drugs or paranoya over being assasinated he progressively became more and mmore unwise. in Stalingrad he lost AN ENTIRE ARMY for a city that had NO millitary advantage, he had Rommel his best field commander shoot himself out of paranoya, he refused to move panzers to normandy eventhough it was obvious thats where invasion was
@dempsey981 Hitler's Generals had a different opinion about some operations? So what? They didn't have HALF of Hitler's knowledge. And they THEMSELVES admitted they were the pupils and not the masters compared to Hitler. Hitler conquered almost the entire Europe and had Russia and the UK in their knees at one point. You can blame him for one or two mistakes. Name me ONE general in HISTORY who never made mistakes! But the fact is Hitler WAS, whether you want to admit it or not, a military genius.
@fuckoff989 u said "you cant blame him for one or two mistakes"haaaaaaa!he lost the entire GERMAN 6TH ARMYYYYYY[the largest army EVER LOST in the entire history of Germany]why in the world could you not blame him for that?He lost the luftwaffe over England,he lost important ukranian sympathizers in the ussr thru murder,ha ha it goes on and on.he made wrong decisions on dropping long range bombers from war productio,and theres not even room here to begin all the tactical fuck ups he meddled in.ha
@dempsey981 Your such a retard. I could sit here all day arguing the mistakes and losses you think Hitler had. But remember if I was to name every victory and accomplishment Hitler did during the war, I'd have to write a thousand comments. But I won't do that because it ALL comes down to the BIG picture. And that tells us a different story.
@dempsey981 Germany conquered nearly the entire Europe and nearly defeated England AND the Soviet Union fighting TWO fronts AT THE SAME TIME. JUST that itself is an AMAZING accomplishment. The world had to LITERALLY unite to merely compete with the military genius of Adolf Hitler and EVEN STILL it was only out of luck they won (they themselves admit to that).
@dempsey981 Now explain something to me you retarded cock sucker, if Hitler was a compulsive incompetent mad man who didn't know anything about war, which you were brainwashed to believe in, then HOW in the hell did Germany achieve ALL of that? Because of the German generals? HMMMM but I thought Hitler didn't listen to his Generals right? So who was responsible for the successful invasion of France and everything else?
@dempsey981 It doesn't matter what you say or how much the truth may hurt you, there is no way in hell you can DENY the military accomplishments of Germany during WW2. That's a FACT. Another FACT is that ONE man was behind all of them. Every tactic, every strategy, every decision, every weapon used, EVERYTHING. If those two facts combined don't make that man a genius, then I don't know what does.
@dempsey981 Hitler lost? Yeah. Caesar lost. Frederick lost. Napoleon lost too. The difference is that Napoleon didn't have to fight as much countries as Hitler had, Napoleon didn't conquer half as much territory as Hitler did, Napoleon couldn't reach England's territory and Hitler could, Napoleon wasn't even close to defeat England or Russia and Hitler was. Yet Napoleon is considered a military genius and Hitler isn't? lmao get the fuck outta here, fucking fool.
@dempsey981 a military genius. So if HE was a genius, then why wasn't Hitler? What's the difference? Oh yeah right, the difference is that when Napoleon lost, the All-lies weren't around to write history, you see? Besides, Hitler didn't make a single mistake. His plans were amazing and extremely well thought. They simply went wrong either because of things nobody could predict or because of things he couldn't control. That's why even the Allies themselves ADMIT they had LUCK in World War 2.
@fuckoff989 wow, hitler didn't make a single mistake, well let's continue our list shall we? switching from millitary to civilian targets during the battle of britain, underestimating the british IN THE FIRST PLACE, he delayed production of the german assault rifle and Me262, and his "no retreat" policies at the end of the war, cost him MANY troops that could have fought another day had they fallen back, but nooo they had to "die for thier fuher."
@bh5496 When did I ever say Hitler made no mistakes you brainless dipshit? First of all, THE BRITISH were the ones targeting German civilians you fucking fool. Germany started doing it for revenge. Watch this video and you'll see who was the first one to target civilians, you brainwashed puppet: /watch?v=Bmyn2bQx_qI . Secondly, Hitler was the one who had most ideas regarding Germany's most advanced weaponry. Third, he never said "NO FALLING BACK", he said "NO SURRENDER". Which is different.
@fuckoff989 wow man you are really fuckin dumb, read the comment that mine REPLIED TO, and you'll see that i quoted your totally ignorant statement "Hitler didn't make a single mistake. " and yes, I DO know that the british bombed first but did Hitler HAVE to switch to civilian targets for revenge? NO HE DIDN'T. hey here's a good idea, keep bombing military targets so that raids into Germany CAN'T HAPPEN ANYMORE.
@bh5496 So keep your stupid ignorance to yourself and shut up. Hitler was not a "great general during the beginning". He was the greatest military genius that has ever lived, you brainwashed clown. Go read the testimonies of his Generals about his immeasurable war knowledge. And he did not shoot himself. The All-lies made that up so that the Germans would surrender. Go watch National Geographic's documentary on Hitler's escape. Go read on wikipedia about how the found body was a blatant double.
@fuckoff989 It was a double. They burned his already charred corpse and threw it overboard at sea. They didn't want anyone or anything to have a shrine to the man. Regardless, the U.S.A. is guilty of the same crimes. One democratic dictatorship defeated an actual dictatorship. Not much was accomplished for the average man aside from the pride or guilt associated with war's end. Make no mistake, the man was psychotic and self-righteous. He was in love with is persona. He mistakeningly was..
@mrccarlos1587 Please spare me of your ignorance. They didn't burn shit. Hitler's body was never found. They lied so that they could say Hitler was a coward. And do NOT compare Hitler's dictatorship to that of the US. Hitler was LOVED by his people. He was in love with his persona? Yeah, he achieved the biggest economic MIRACLE in history, he SINGLE HANDEDLY built the world's number 1 power and he put France, Britain and Russia combined on their knees. And you wanted him to have a small ego?
@fuckoff989 Ha, are you serious or just playing some kind of game? I hope you don't actually believe that rubbish you are saying? The moron single handedly LOST the war when it could have been won by the greatest military force yet seen! His blunders one right after the other destroyed the true Germany! German heritage and culture lost because of his terrible military , dipolomatic and production blunders! Konigsberg, Breslau, Stettin ... all lost because of him!
@fuckoff989 ..a drug addict. Opiates deteriorate your mind and judgement. This was clear towards the end, he allowed Germany to become a burial ground. He should have sought a diplomatic end once Germany lost Stalingrad. He would have been executed either way but at least would have saved the country from annihilation from allied bombers.
@mrccarlos1587 besides that, Hitler DID seek a diplomatic end LONG before Stalingrad, you retard. He proposed several peace treaties to Britain and he even offered Germany's military services to protect England's colonies worldwide. He said since the VERY BEGINNING "All we want is to be left alone". Churchill was the mentally sick one who refused any sort of peace request by Germany. So again, please stop talking about stuff you know nothing about.
@fuckoff989 Greatest military genious that has ever lived? LOL!!!!! Are you kidding me? Dunkirk, DoW USA, Me-262 jet delay, USSR friendly population option, Kursk , Ukraine deployment in 41, No African support, and on and on. The moron basically snatched defeat from the jaws of victory! Half the times you wonder if the idiot was TRYING to lose the war with some of his stupid decisions.
@lonewulf44 That's what Wilhelm Keitel, Supreme Command of the German Armed Forces, said when asked to describe Hitler's immeasurable knowledge concerning war. And that's just half of it. Plus there are more quotes from other German generals which I find no need to post. So you do your search, idiot. That said, once again I repeat, YES Hitler DID make mistakes. He wouldn't be human if he didn't, but when you say Germany was the greatest power yet seen, please note you are praising Hitler. ;)
@fuckoff989 Think about who you are using to describe the man .... W. Keitel ... the biggest and most worthless 'yes man' who led absolutely nothing during the war, and kept his appointed position by ONLY never using whatever strategic sense he had. Lets look at Manstein's views on Hitler? Or Guderian perhaps? Proven masters of their occupation and see their opinion of the man and his abilities. Mistakes are one thing, but some of his blunders defy simple strategic common sense.
@fuckoff989 I will never preaise Hitler! The man destroyed the true and historically great Germany! That culture and heritage were stolen and killed by his blunders and brainless actions. Konigsberg, Stetten, Elbing, Breslau ... all lost due to him! I respect, research, and can appreciate aspects of the German army and armed forces ... but Hitler only gets credit for hindering and hampering and ultimately destroying those forces!
@lonewulf44 ...you west germans were lucky that right after WW2 you have a man named Conrad Adenuer to put your country back towards prosperity...For the East germans, that's a different story...Had Hitler not been greedy,by attacking France and England, he would have a true Festung Europa...
@010bobby England and France declared war on germany, not the other way round. After all and even the most generous offers to the poles failed, and they kept on slaughtering the german minority, Hitler saw himself forced to end that msiery. It was england and france that turned a local polish/german conflict into a world war. Never forget that.
@TheNonConformative Your point is baseless..Every country in Europe has minority germans..USA has minority Germans..France has minority germans...so, you are saying is Hitler is going to conquer the whole world because of german minorities everywhere..Don't you think that is a questionable thinking? Like Saddam did conquer Kuwait because there were minority Iraquis there? C,mon now you are blaming someone else for Hitler's stupid ambition...England and France declared war coz of a treaty..
@TheNonConformative Oh Yeah..you could have fooled me..Let see, Austria,Rhineland Poland,czeck,Hungary,Greece,most of scandinavian countries, Bavaria,Ukraine,Georgia, Lavtia,North Africa,Sicily,Italy, He even had plans to conquer USA until the US and UK stop him in the west and Russia stop him in the east...what are you gonna say to that? my friend you need to study history especially Hitler's wars
@TheNonConformative ...these people you mentioned are fantasy writers..if you want to read a real book..go to the library and check out the book...History of the second WW2...that will settle our argument..beside what is Hitler doing attacking these weak countries? Just for fun i guess? Answer that please..
@010bobby Well, even after attacking and defeating France ... the fool corporal had many options at his table. He basically chose one wrong turn after the other and blundered his way to destruction sucking the entire nation and culture down with him. Sigh ... Poor Konigsberg, Poor Breslau ...
@alynwhite Watch this documentary by the History channel called "Hitler's escape": /watch?v=iCyfiG7aTB4 . It's complete on youtube. That's just ONE OF the thousands of lies the All-lies wrote in history regarding Hitler and WW2. The Germans were obsessively in love with Hitler, they were willing to follow him to hell if needed. Lying Hitler committed suicide was the only way they could make the Germans surrender and inventing the Holocaust was the only way they could make them stop loving him.
@fuckoff989 hahah, stupid russians. as usual. what can you expect from some vodka drinkers, they had the skull of a woman. But if all this is true, then the stupid relatives of Hitler that live in America must be tested so we know if the blood on the sofa was really his or not
@alynwhite HUh? The British made it know they wouldn't allow a Polish invasion ... Hitler called their bluff and it wasn't a bluff? Thus he made the fight , his choice. Granted England should have let the Poles fend for themselves but thats another topic. As for civvies .... I think Polish civvies can attest to who first 'started' that ... but is irrelevent as in total war all sides can be accused of things in hindsight.
russians are fucking insane
moonc4lf 1 month ago
nazi age was a nightmare but Germans never raped any girl . Russians done it so much when they won
WutangClan4LiF3 1 month ago
@WutangClan4LiF3
Nazis never raped any girl ? Are you kidding me ?
The Nazis raped all kind of women, everyone raped
its war, its not alright. But when you have men that have been fighting
for years without having any sex, theres going to be rape.
TheAnunnakiMessiah 3 weeks ago
The French did not even have radios in their tanks!!
nunneley60 2 months ago
@nunneley60 What's your point? The radio was a 'new' invention in those days
arc175 2 months ago
he delivered message to whom......? germans thats he can fight or for russians as a treat........and what is he saying from 1:50 to 2:07 can anybody explain..........plz....!!
rahulrathode 2 months ago
@rahulrathode he says instead of cows they lined up russian soldiers made them lock arms and walk through a mine field while pointing machine guns at them to get them to walk. THEN the soldiers die by stepping on the mines . SO WHEN no cows are around they use thier own men on a suicide mission
speedmagnet24 2 months ago
@speedmagnet24 thanks for reply dude......!!
rahulrathode 2 months ago
Moooooooo...... hahaha...
dvsxavier 3 months ago
War was declare from juda because germany have 1933 do what in israel of today is the normalst thing or want they germans in their government and financialsystem ?
finsterwald181167 4 months ago
did he say thye cleared the minefields with COWS or CARS? either way is hilarious XD
bh5496 6 months ago
@bh5496 You don't know ABSOLUTELY SHIT of what you're talking about. Stalingrad had no military advantage?? You retard. It was the TURNING POINT of WW2. Experts say Germany would have won the war had Stalingrad been taken (it was rich in oil resources Germany desperately needed). Go watch the documentary "The battle of Stalingrad", it's on youtube. Hitler's plan was BRILLIANT. The Germans only lost because the foolish and unprepared ITALIAN and ROMANIAN divisions screwed up and got them trapped.
fuckoff989 6 months ago
@fuckoff989 LOL! What???! You are crazy friend, that or have been badly misinformed. Stalingrad is just a top 3 in a long list of blunders the fool corporal made! Stalingrad had no oil, the fields to the south around Grozny and such. Stalingrad was a complete waste and worse a terrible terrible example of just asking for defeat! If Operation blue was kept as it first was intended (again Hitler interfering) the city might have been taken early on.
lonewulf44 5 months ago in playlist More videos from allinaday
@lonewulf44 How did stalingrad have no oil you retard? Stalingrad was THE KEY to deny Russia its own resources and keep Germany filled and strong. Please stop vomiting that ignorance of yours, I hate repeating myself. Go watch the documentary "The battle of Stalingrad" EVERY goddamn expert admits Germany would have won the war HANDS DOWN had Stalingrad been taken. Your stupid brainwashed opinion means little compared to undeniable facts.
fuckoff989 5 months ago
@fuckoff989 Lol, I almost want to sigh and shake my head that somehow there are still people who try to back or worship that fool dictator and his absolutely terrible military (let alone domestic and economic and diplomatic) decisions. Stalingrad was central for Volga traffic and goods around it, but it was not the goal for specific oil fields.
lonewulf44 5 months ago
@fuckoff989 As for denying Russia these resources , taking the city would have done that. But, that was already accomplished by just the strategic position Operation Blue ended up putting German forces. Of course that ignores the fact that Hitler interference with Op. Blau to begin with as the city could have been easily taken. It was Hitlers moronic insistence to grind up his ground forces in a stupid urban hellhole and wast precious armored forced while inviting soviet counter attacks
lonewulf44 5 months ago
@lonewulf44 Hitler snatched defeat from the jaws of victory? O really? And who took Germany to "the jaws of victory" in the first place, you brainless retard? Hitler SINGLE HANDEDLY conquered Europe almost entirely (unlike Napoleon who made his opponents quit out of fear, without having to fight). The world had to LITERALLY UNITE to take him on and even still, almost lost. It was said for many years that the Waffen-SS was an undefeatable force. Now who created the Waffen-SS in the first place?
fuckoff989 5 months ago
@fuckoff989 LOL, again ... almost funny and sad how you have nothing right. The fact is , the moron Hitler UNITED that world around him with he stupid actions! He DoW on the US for no GAIN! He invaded USSR and CREATED a two front war! German gains over Poland and France were entirely to the credit of the German General staff , not the bungling fool Hitler! And France specifically contains his only wise decision of the entire post 1939 era when he used Manstein's ardennes plans.
lonewulf44 5 months ago
@fuckoff989 oh yeah, napoleon NEEEEEVER went to the front line. he just sat back at his desk in berlin making dumb millitary decisions without truely understanding the full scope of the situato... oh wait, you dumbasss, that was hitler.
bh5496 5 months ago
@bh5496 Ask his opponent what they say bout Nap. Wellington famously said he was worth 40,000 men on the field didn't he? Pretty sure everyone agrees that Hitler's bungling decision HELPED his enemy. Some of his choices erupting entire fronts, lost entire ARMIES, handicapped entire strategic situations, and managed to ruin technological possibilities by moronic ideology. Comparing the fool corporal with Bonaparte must make the emperor roll over in his grave with shame.
lonewulf44 5 months ago
@bh5496 Hitler didn't need to go to the front you retard. There were better forms of communication. If Napoleon could, he would have stayed away from the front line as well you dumb shit. What would be the point of Hitler being in the front line? First of all, there were several fronts, meaning he couldn't have controlled all of them if he choose to go to one. And yes, it makes complete sense that Hitler targeted British civilians after the British targeted Germans. A taste of the same medicine.
fuckoff989 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 no it doesn't in ANY tactical sence. he had the RAF ON THE ROPES, then a few bombs fall on berlin( the RAF was retaliating to an accidental bombing on London made by some lost Jerry pilots) and then he decides to bomb british cities, giving the RAF needed breathing room to rebuild and overcome the germans. and my sarcasm about the front was in response to your idiotic statement that "Napoleon who made his opponents quit out of fear, without having to fight"
bh5496 4 months ago
@bh5496 Which part of "THE BRITISH, NOT THE GERMANS, started bombing civilians" didn't you understand? And RAF never "overcame" the Germans. Hitler had Britain on its knees before the Americans came in. And yes, Napoleon DID NOT conquer most of the territories he occupied you dumb piece of shit. Go study some history. Countries such as Spain openly surrendered to Napoleon because they were scared of his army. Hitler on the other hand, had to fight each one of the countries he occupied.
fuckoff989 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 the british were the first to start bombing INTENTIONALY, but it was in response to bombs that fell on London when a german bomber flight UNINTENTIONALY dropped their bombs on London. you boob, napoleon lured the king of spain into france, arrested him, and forced a surrender, BUT most of the Spanish armies and civilians continued open geurilla warfare with the british and portuguese against the french. causing a long, drawn out war in the spanish peninsula.
bh5496 4 months ago
@bh5496 Rofl now you are making up history. Which is obvious as you are American so you don't know shit about the world. NEVER did I hear about Spain's king being "lured and arrested by Napoleon" haha. You're SO ignorant. And what evidence do you have of the German "unintentional bombing of London"? Because I have plenty of evidence of British INTENTIONAL bombing of German civilians. And America was a problem to Hitler since the START, constantly giving Britain all types of essential support.
fuckoff989 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 i'm making nup history? says the guy who said hitler made no mistakes and denotes his generals' abilities to just being pawns of that bafoon? in more detail, Charles IV, already largly unpopular, was pressured into abdicating his throne in favor of his son Ferdinand in 1808. but Charles later retracted his abdication in favor of Napy's brother Joseph Bonaparte. although Joseph technically was king, most spanish didn't approve and still considered Ferdinand as right king.
bh5496 4 months ago
@bh5496 Please tll me when did I EVER say Hitler made no mistakes you idiot? Hitler did make mistakes. He wouldn't be human if he didn't. But that does NOT change what he, ALONE, accomplished . Which was far greater than Napoleon. Am I "denoting Hitler's generals to being nothing but pawns?" Have you even read how Hitler's generals described his genius after the war? They said it THEMSELVES they were nothing but PUPILS compared to Hitler's immeasurable war knowledge and genius. Do your research.
fuckoff989 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 "a military genius. So if HE was a genius, then why wasn't Hitler? What's the difference? Oh yeah right, the difference is that when Napoleon lost, the All-lies weren't around to write history, you see? Besides, Hitler didn't make a single mistake." these are your words good sir; please note THE LAST SENTENCE! yes hitler did do much for german economy & morale, at the expence of jews, communists ect. of course, and some victories credible to him, but MANY more stupid losses.
bh5496 4 months ago
@bh5496 Theoretically it is arguable Hitler didn't make mistakes considering the things that went wrong, could not be predicted by anyone and his plans would have worked under normal conditions. Judging from an outside historical perspective though you may say he made mistakes because for whatever reason things didn't go as planned. That's what I meant. His losses were not "stupid" you retard. Nobody in the world would have single handedly accomplished half of what he did.
fuckoff989 4 months ago
@bh5496 Stop belittling the history's most brilliant general, you filthy jew. How did Hitler accomplish things "at the expense of jews and communists"?? Hitler SAVED Germany from these people. Germany would have rotten in hell if the communists took power. You are nothing but a blind hater too jealous and dumb to admit respect the legend of Adolf Hitler. Hitler declared war on America because it was clear sooner or later USA would declare war on Germany for no reason (like it happened in WW1)
fuckoff989 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 one minor reason why america declared war on germany during the great was was because of the Lucitania, but the BIG reason was because they'd descovered an elleged plot made by germany for mexico to attack america.
bh5496 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fuckoff989 hahahahahahahaha all you neo nazis are all alike! anyone who disagrees with hitler in you guys' minds is always automatically either a "filthy JEEEEEW" or bolshevik/commie whatever. say what you want but i am not nor will i ever be either of said things. this comment says i all, you are just some pathetic neo nazi wishing for hitler to return from the grave so y'all can relive the glory days of the 1930's. no sir, you are the "blind hater" along with every other nazi who ever lived.
bh5496 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 the allies could have attempted to kill hitler at one point but realized he'd lose the war faster than they could win it, and they were right. if anything hitler was an ok politician but not a military genious. things ALL went down hill faster than before the moment he took absolute control of the military.
bh5496 4 months ago
@bh5496 the plan was that after Germany declared war on USA, Japan would in exchange and declare war on the Soviet Union.Russia would be invaded by Japan from the South and it wouldn't be able to handle two fronts (like Hitler did btw).Russia would be defeated in a matter of months. Then it would be USA vs a wounded Germany which would STILL have been enough to kick the Americans' ass with Hitler in command. He declared war on USA because he was sure he could beat them if things went as planned.
fuckoff989 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 just because he didn't know his mistakes were mistakes doesn't mean they aren't mistakes, THEY STILL ARE. and yes, many of his losses WERE quite stupid, example: not letting the army withdraw from Stalingrad when they were about to be cut of AND not giving them permission to break out when they were was quite unwise. and mabe before hastily declaring war on US he should have, gee i dunno, waited until japan declared war on russia so his plan would be foolproof.
bh5496 4 months ago
@bh5496 Again you are making up stupid facts because you don't know shit about what happened. America declared war on Germany in WW1 because the JEWS who run America forced it too, THAT was the whole reason the Germans hated Jews in the first place you idiot. Go read about the Stab-in-the-back legend. The Nazis hated Jews so much because they sold and betrayed Germany making an agreement with the British that USA would be brought to war with Germany if England gave them Palestine.
fuckoff989 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 yeah yeah, jew conspiracy blah blah blah, trying to take over world blah blah blah. uh huh i've heard it all before. your recent comments prove it all, you're just some sad neo nazi with a Hitler-ized view of history and the world. therefor you are nothing more than a waste of time and a human life and chances are this is my last comment to you because you are utterly pointless. so, good day sir, and good riddance.
bh5496 3 months ago
@fuckoff989
Hitler declared war on the USA because Japan declared war on the USA.
ZehqMW 3 months ago
@ZehqMW I suggest you listen to one of Hitler's publishments of why he declared war on the US.
MuchoFunkie 3 months ago
@ZehqMW: He relished the opertunity to openly attack our supply ships going to Britain & Russia. He thought his submarines could cut off the supply route. Damn near right too.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@bh5496 Like I said, it DOESN'T matter if Hitler made mistakes. The most brilliant geniuses in history all made mistakes. They were HUMAN. That doesn't lower the merit of what he accomplished. His losses were NOT stupid, stop talking shit of stuff you know nothing about. He didn't allow troops to fall-back because that meant the war was already LOST. Germany NEEDED to take over Stalingrad's resources in order to continue the war. Without Stalingrad it was useless to fall back. The war was lost.
fuckoff989 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 Dude, that isnt quite right. Hitler blew it at Stalingrad because he persecuted a non-strategic battle that was to break the will of the Soviet Union...Stalin's city, etc. The resources were to the south, he could have copped those resources without taking Stalingrad. However, had Stalingrad fallen then the fight wud probably have been knocked out of the Russians, & Stalin himself wud have had to concede there was no stopping the German armies on Soviet soil.
keysphilip 3 months ago
@fuckoff989 However, u are right that Hitler was mostly genius, he certainly was not an idiot. But he wasn't a great military tactician, and he was given to bouts of changing his mind right at conclusive moments during the war years. Probably his biggest mistake was at Kursk, 1943, he held back many divisions "in reserve" when if they'd have been committed, maybe the Red Army would have been defeated. Difficult to say, we can all be armchair Generals with 20/20 hindsight.
keysphilip 3 months ago
@keysphilip well i fought in kursk, theres no way we would have won there
RepublicanNatio 3 months ago
@RepublicanNatio The Battle of Kursk was never actually truly 'won'. It was similar to Battle of Britain, in that Hitler just decided to pull back from the fighting (on the basis that his losses were getting too high). But there's still many debates that argue had Hitler thrown in everything & kept attacking then maybe the Russians would have been beaten there. The Ruskies had far heavier casualties than the Germans did at Kursk. One thing 4sure, Kursk was the most epic battle of modern warfare.
keysphilip 3 months ago
@keysphilip: In the end, what Russia & Germany HAD were their people. From this testimony we can see the Stalin didn't care about wasting his men. Such suicide squads were common on the Soviet side. You tell a man that his wife & children will be sent to a concentration camp if they don't do the suicide mission, they usually did it. If Hitler sent every person in Germany in to Kursk, Stalin would have just kept matching him until every last German was dead.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@VictorLepanto Well, yes I think you're right. Its frightening to think how these two singular minded dictators would sacrifice every last person in their country, without remorse or care for human life. It is however a testament to Soviet peoples that they managed to 'arm up' their war machine in 1942-43 with thousands of tanks & planes to have the armour to match, & then finally over turn,Germany's huge initial advantage. Stuff like the T-34 tank was a 'war winner' in the final WW2 assessment.
keysphilip 2 months ago
@keysphilip: That & Hitler's bolluxing his own troops by insistining operationally useless developements, like ever larger tanks which were heavy & over complex & thus of little value in real combat. Take the American vs. German tank situation. A single German tank was effective against 3 U.S. tanks. The thing is we outproduced them at about 4 to 1, thus the 4th tank always took out the German tank.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@VictorLepanto Adolf sure led the German war machine on some dead end paths. But all ways you look at it, the Germans just got worn down by being outnumbered, and the incompetence of their so-called allies. I feel sorry for the German wehrmacht soldiers, they were brave & honorable troops. They got the shit end of the stick and died fighting for an ideology that wasn't even their own belief/s.
keysphilip 2 months ago
@keysphilip: In the end, the German troops were just stalling for time. They tried to evacuate as many Germans as possible from the East. They knew what kind of vengeful storm was coming. I think it was one of the great mistakes of history that the allies declined to take Berlin. We;d have a much easier post-war/Cold War era if we had. I blame it on the Democrats for putting up an obviously unfit FDR merely to retain power.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@VictorLepanto As from what I understood, the Allies had already promised Stalin that the Red Army cud make the 'coup de gras' on the Nazi Capitol & take the Reichstag, which in fairness to USSR's horrendous losses in the war on the Eastern Front they had 'earned' that right.
keysphilip 2 months ago
@keysphilip: A little known fact, @ the Tehran & Yalta conferences, FDR's chief adviser was Alger Hiss. FDR was so sick that he could only function for a few hours a day. He was observed to be drifting off & not following during the long sessions. He was really half dead already. He was just being used as a puppet by Hiss & other Soviet agents who'd infiltrated his gov't.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@VictorLepanto I didnt know that, but it makes sense, FDR was indeed very ill at that time. It makes one think how things may have been arranged differently if Truman had come in a year earlier.
keysphilip 2 months ago
@keysphilip: I think that Henry Wallace was still VP then. Wallace was replaced by a coalition of Southern segregationists, who wanted a less radical man in the White House. Wallace ran as a 3rd party candidate against Truman under the Progressive Party. A party which was run as a front by the communists. I don't think Wallace was consciously suportive of the communists. Just a typical useful idiot lefty liberal.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@VictorLepanto I wonder if Winston Churchill was aware(or felt) any of this going on? Not that he could have influenced it any differently. USA & USSR held all the cards. They had 'beaten' Germany,the part that us Brits played was superficial in the overall big picture. 1940 Battle of Britain was an important early event, of course,but in truth Hitler just redirected his focus to the plans for Russia in 1941. If he'd pursued the attack on UK,Germany would have taken Britain within 6 more months.
keysphilip 2 months ago
@keysphilip: It was Churchill's holding out in the Battle of Britain period that made a final victory over Hitler possible. W/o Churchill, Hitler would have won WWII. It is that simple in my book.
Churchill didn't attend FDR's funeral, some think this might have been reflection of his treatment @ the Tehran & Yalta conferences. FDR went out of his way to snub Churchill in those places. FDR actually stayed in the Soviet embassy in Tehran!
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@VictorLepanto As a proud Brit, I of course dont underrate the Battle of Britain; indeed it was crucial to the future of the war, vital that Germany did not take the UK in 1940. But the reality is that Hitler suspended that battle, he didn't 'lose' it, in the general sense of the word. There are many facets of the B.o.B that played in the advantage of the RAF, but nothing can take away the amazing courage & skill of the 'Few' RAF pilots who fought the mighty Luftwaffe in the Summer of 1940.
keysphilip 2 months ago
@keysphilip: It is certainly true that Hitler was driven by his racist ideology to turn from the British to the Russians. All that lebensraum nonsense. I still think that action only brought about more quickly what would have occured otherwise.
I doubt if FDR would have allowed a final defeat of Britain. Certainly Canada & the Anzac forces wouldn't have abandoned Britain. If Hitler had attempted an amphibious assault, it would have been worse then Stalingrad for him.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@VictorLepanto It was kinda strange how the Germans had the fleeing Brits pinned down at Dunkirk before so many escaped across the channel back to England - and it seemed the Germans almost gave them time to escape (another Adolf mistake perhapd?) Indeed Adolf wasn't big on navy or water borne assaults. I wonder why he didnt push for heavy bombers (as RAF & USAF were so focused to do), the luftwaffe was strong yet lacked a real 'city flattening' capability.
keysphilip 2 months ago
@keysphilip: Goring promised Hitler he could easily wipeout the troops at Dunkirk from the air. This was hardly the last time Goring promised an easy air victory & couldn't deliver. It is actually a shame Hitler didn't attempt a crossing, he'd have done it in force & not like the Dieppe raid. France could then have more easily been retaken.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@VictorLepanto Goering was indeed a failure, hardly in the same league as Rommel or Guderian. Hitler had some clowns around him, & appeared to listen more to these invertebrates than the good aides he had on side. The Third Reich perhaps had no chance from the beginning when u look at the quality (& concepts) of some of Adolfs inner circle! But Hitler had the drive & energy to inspire the people, for that alone I guess he earned the right to lead it, such as 'it' was.
keysphilip 2 months ago
@keysphilip: If France had effective leadership at the moment it was needed, they wouldn't have been overrun. Hitler woud have found himself in the same predicament was 1914 & the general would have moved to blow him up in a more timely fashion. This speculation of course, but I think it sound.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@VictorLepanto But was France capable in 1939 of resisting such a mass of troops & armour? I feel that the main 'failure' of the Allies came in the 1936-39 period, as they just looked-on. almost impotent, as Germany became a Superpower.
If WW2 showed anything, it perhaps underlined the importance of having the right allies. Hitler's 'axis' was pretty poor in comparison to the German forces.Albeit I guess the Germans didnt show their allies much respect anyway, even before the collapse started.
keysphilip 2 months ago
@keysphilip: In many ways, the French military was superior to the German. Certainly in terms of equipment. My understaning is that the general commanding French forces was suffering from some aspects of dimentia from syphilis. Then we can talk about the politics. The French left has long taken credit for being the leading lights of ther resistance. Actually, the communist resisted the war then b/c of Stalin's orders. The indepdent left wasn't much better.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@VictorLepanto I guess that the French Resistance was pretty effective, through its own weapons as much as those supplied to it. As I read, the FR was made up of large numbers, albeit they were careful how many were utilised in action. Brave guys (& girls), u didn't want to be captured alive by the SS in France. It must have been terrible to be in an underground movement, knowing the consequences of capture. Heroes to a man/woman.
keysphilip 2 months ago
@keysphilip The French in 1940 when the Germans invaded France were on the whole a stronger force, the main reason they were defeated was because of poor deployment and tactics which allowed them to be surrounded and destroyed relatively easily.
eurofightertyphoon10 2 months ago
@VictorLepanto BE GLAD WE DIDNT take berlin .. WE fucked the russians hard core!! we gave them that victory and then granted them the rights to the lands (that they just took and felt was theirs. ) WHILE AMERICA got the top nazi scientist and all the technology ( NASA founder ALL our aerospace technology and etc ... LOOK WHO IS THE MAN NOW ! WE GOT ALL THE technology so we are the most powerful nation >> WISH they could go back NOW Russia?
speedmagnet24 2 months ago
@bh5496 and Hitler DID handle 2 fronts at the same time for most of the war you ignorant fool. Even the documentaries made by the All-lies admit Hitler had the Soviet Union AND England in their knees at one point in the war. Not to mention the countries he had already DEFEATED like France, Netherlands, Belgium, Greece, Norway, etc. If you are too stupid or too proud to admit the genius in that, then this debate is useless. You are like a horse that only looks forward.
fuckoff989 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 btw, if by "(like Hitler did btw)" you are implying that hitler did handle a 2 front war, no he didn't, that's another reason why he lost, because he was squished between the vice of the allies from the west and soviets from the east.
bh5496 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 Both Charles and Ferdinand were kept as prisoners in france for almost the entire remaider of the war.
bh5496 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 btw, America wouldn't have been a problem at the time if Hitler hadn't DECLARED WAR ON AMERICA.
bh5496 4 months ago
@lonewulf44 Just look at what you're saying you moron, you are indirectly calling yourself stupid without even realizing it. You just said Nazi Germany was the greatest military force yet seen. Now, WHO created that military force you irrational dipshit? It was Hitler ALONE. From the first to the last bit of it. When Hitler got to power years after WW1, Germany was a piece of shit country that didn't even have a military. Hitler single handedly took it to become the greatest power ever seen.
fuckoff989 5 months ago
@fuckoff989 Wrong again I'm afraid. The German war machine was 'great' due to its collection of both the most skilled and qualified command officers on the general staff, a simple but masterful NCO organization and objective structure, and of course a manpower to drawn on that has a heritage like none other. Hitler had ZERO to do with that ...and its only when the madman INTERFERES with that does bad things happen! Correction, plenty of his decision cause bad things outside of the military2
lonewulf44 5 months ago
@lonewulf44 "To a degree which is almost incomprehensible, Hitler had studied general staff publications, military literature, essays on tactics, operations and strategy and he had a knowledge in the military fields which can only be called amazing. Hitler was so well informed concerning, armament, leadership and equipment of all armies and all navies of the globe that it was impossible to prove any error on his part. (...) Only a genius can do that. (...) I was the pupil and not the master."
fuckoff989 5 months ago
@fuckoff989 Hmmm, then how do you explain his outrageous mistakes! Leaving the BEF at Dunkirk? Pushing the Me-262 fighter away? DoW on the USA, entire Operation Citadel? Political cronies kept, Failure to easily take Eygpt, The Ukrainian pocket mistake, wasteful wartime racial policies, ... and on and on.
lonewulf44 5 months ago
@lonewulf44 I dunno .... Hitler made many mistakes and missed many opportunities... i think his greatest mistake was declaring war on the USA and not pushing Japan harder into opening a front with the Russians
ADZ01982 5 months ago
@ADZ01982 Well, he's too many mistakes and terrible blunders are almost too numerous to count but that's a big one. He was already in a mess at 12-41 but he had not slammed close the window of victory yet. He's already willingly opened a massive 2 front war, diverted Army Group Cen away from Moscow thereby losing it, and chased away millions of willing fighters and allies by his brutality of the Eastern soviet populations. DoW on US was just the cherry on top of stupidity, but not the last
lonewulf44 5 months ago
@ADZ01982 Pushing hard doesn't begin to come close to it, he should have SECURED Japanese entry or help before offering an entire DoW! It makes absolutely zero ... no scratch that ... negative sense to bring about such events. He seems habitually incapable of make wise choices and as they stack up over the years ... your left astonished that some high ranking mil. officer just didn't put a bullet into his chest and know that the reichstag janitor could replace him and still be better off
lonewulf44 5 months ago
@bh5496 cars full of soliders
stupid russians
alynwhite 5 months ago
@bh5496 cars full of soliders. stupid russians
alynwhite 5 months ago
Hitler is a pussy! If he ever saw me he would run away
JSCMGO 6 months ago
@JSCMGO no because I would kill you with a luger p08 bitch or a ppk fuc kface gay fag.
TheHEROESdontRUN 6 months ago
i like the cow idea, much smarter! lol
LebenInEinheit 6 months ago
@Andrew598895 You missed my entire point, Hitler was another briefly successful politician. If you think about it, he was weirdly emotional, everything he did was emotive, he hated this group or that, say Slavs - so attempted to destroy them etc. He was an adult with child tantrum complex. And his CoC military strategy reflected this, it was not systematic, but had emotive vengeful turns, otherwise he would have tactically withdrawn in many instances, Stalingrad the best example.
100milnic 6 months ago
@100milnic Indeed, he lost the entire 6th Army there.And yet they could have been saved had he trusted his Field Martial Manstein. According to him, he would not see reason in so many instances, and Stalingrad was for vengeance and status more than military advantage.Germany had the best trained military in the world in that time period.Had there been a commander instead of Hitler wearing two hats - Germany would have won, but Hitler trusted no one.
PanzerGirl88 6 months ago
@Andrew598895 Kursk was the end of wehremact offensive, was obvious & overly delayed campaign that let soviets prepare colossal defense in depth. But even in victory Hitler made big errors, ie halting the panzers before Dunkirk to allow the British to escape. But key thing is he was politician not trained staff officer, once fully in charge he was constantly diluting power of his striking forces for mixed & changing goals & was far too profligate with his most valuable forces, ie at Stalingrad
100milnic 6 months ago
@Andrew598895 No in truth Hitler was distasterous military leader, his early success was based on political pressure not military strategy, ie march into Rhur, Sudentland & Austria. Victory over France came from Manstien's plan & Hitler stole credit for it. After assuming full control Hitler's decisions were mostly poor, as he had limited understanding of support logistics & worse had little concern for casualties. He was an ambitious politician not a military leader. The USSR gamble showed it.
100milnic 6 months ago
WE USE COWS FOR COVER 2!
RagingBlast2Fan 6 months ago
Like to see the whole thing. Was this fellow wounded and got out before Satlingrad the following year?
rojambeau 7 months ago
Eastern Front was freezin' hell.
CaliberSlo 7 months ago
History is written by the victor ... I do not support Hitler ideas , instead I hate them , however according to the way things turned out , the Allies made everyone think that the Germans / Japanese are bad and monstrous ... That is not right . We cannot blame these days the Germans as cruel because of the past . In my opinion it is the goverment that always creates the war , not the people . In all of our history only the flags changed , not the wars
DaredeviIGR 7 months ago
@DaredeviIGR I dunno, they had to have something wrong about them to get that violent and cruel, not just a few leaders
DawnOfTheDead991 7 months ago
Stop claiming that Stalin and Hitler were stupid or were amateur commanders. Both served in war and did outstandingly as soldiers and junior military commanders. It becomes extreme pressure to lead millions when the whole world falls on your shoulders and you make mistakes. Admittedly, some German and Soviet generals were more strategically genius then their leaders, but nonetheless both commanders were geniuses of their time. Cunning, deceitful, spiteful, intelligent, wise and true-born leaders
nloladze 8 months ago
@nloladze great comment
dke388209 7 months ago
@nloladze hitler was great untill he got into those drugs, morphine was it? the drugs and his various personal mental issues are what fucked him over.
bh5496 6 months ago
Salute to the soldiers from both Army.
hatedwayne 8 months ago
If you had taken Stalin and the Russian army and put them in France in 1940 they would have got steamrolled like the French did. The size of Russia saved their ass
xpat73 8 months ago
@xpat73If it was;nt for the channel england would have been steamrollered long ago.
jrobertsoneff 8 months ago
@xpat73 I guess the army was tailored to the need ,but it dont say much for hitlers leadership
jrobertsoneff 8 months ago
The Russians won because of numbers of men allowing the to absorb HUGE casualties, and the ability to retreat over an endless land mass, the T-34 tank, and the weather...which was compounded by Hitler attacking to late.....and Hitler's insanely bad meddling in tactics.
xpat73 8 months ago
Don't fuck with Russia. it's fatal to your health
ararat123457 8 months ago
If the Germans had that much man power to waste. . . damn. . . i think the world would have been speaking a different tongue
88KRUZE 8 months ago
Hitler: Okay, guys, I want to move our armies RIGHT into Russia and take Moscow. Wipe that nation from the face of the earth.
Hitler's Generals: Well... fuck...
EdikShepherd 10 months ago
Zhukov and Konev kicked ass in WW2.
Bye Bye Nazis.
DanKelso 11 months ago
In 1942 two amateur commanders (Hitler and Stalin) had command of the two most powerful armies that had ever been assembled for war.
In all honestly it was one of the greatest tragedies in human history, The Russian and German suffering there was simply a grim testament to the unyielding need for humans to kill each other en masse.
14BeProud 11 months ago 9
@14BeProud thank you for your insightful and poignant comment. David Hoffman–filmmaker
allinaday 11 months ago 3
@allinaday Hitler and Stalin not only were amateur - but their amateur experience was based on a totally different type of warfare and neither understood mobility. At least Stalin after the defeats of 1941 was able to take advice which Hitler increasingly frequently refused.
alanheath 8 months ago
@14BeProud haha Hitler was a amateur commander? lmao. His generals described him in the Nuremberg trials as a military genius. They said he would spend every single night studying hundreds of books from different Generals. They said his knowledge about war was so deep and his tactics and plans were so well elaborated it was almost impossible to point out a single mistake. If the German military was powerful and achieved so much, it was ALL, I repeat, ALLLL because of Hitler. Gtfo, ignorant fool.
fuckoff989 11 months ago
@fuckoff989
ROFL!
Hitler was somewhat well read in military Doctrine (especially that of Frederick The Great and Napoleon) as far as theory was concerned.
Von Manstein, Guderian, Rommel, and many others made a point to disagree with Hitler's overbearing strategic control of the eastern front. At the end of the day, Hitler had the formal military prowess of a corporal. Nothing less. For that is what he was.
These are facts, whether you like it or not.
14BeProud 11 months ago
@14BeProud QUOTE: "To a degree which is almost incomprehensible, Hitler had studied general staff publications, military literature, essays on tactics, operations and strategy and... he had a knowledge in the military fields which can only be called amazing... Hitler was so well informed concerning, armament, leadership and equipment of all armies and... all navies of the globe that it was impossible to prove any error on his part...Hitler studied at night all the big general staff books by (..)
fuckoff989 11 months ago
@14BeProud (...) Moltke, Schieffen and Clausewitz...Therefore we had the impression: Only a genius can do that...even in the simple everyday questions concerning organization and equipment of the Wehrmacht ... I was the pupil and not the master... " - by Wilhelm Keitel, the head of Supreme Command of the Armed Forces." - That's the testimony from one of the heads of the Nazi army. THOSE are facts. The load of diarrhea that's coming out of your mouth is nothing but your mere ignorant speculation.
fuckoff989 11 months ago
@14BeProud ... but the FACT is Adolf Hitler WAS a military genius, bigger than Napoleon. After WW2 the Allies tried to kill his legend in every possible way with bullshit lies like claiming he was incompetent and stupid and didn't know anything about war and should have listened to his generals. Which is exactly the opposite of what he was. But you see, brainless retards like you believe all their crap without questioning. I've shown you facts right there, now YOU show me your facts, dumb fuck.
fuckoff989 11 months ago
@fuckoff989 Coporal Adolph,a military genius??How silly.Read more detail,the classic "RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD RIECH" by William Shrier,published right after the war,and HIGHLY detailed,ought to set u straighter on the military prowess of Hitler.'The German Generals"is another that wiill debunk your genius theory
dempsey981 10 months ago
@dempsey981 You have absolutely no idea of what your talking about. I can't believe your actually recommending me PROPAGANDA books. Go read the REAL history, retard. I just presented a quote from a top German general. And that's one of many. Hitler was in charge of every advance, every tactic, every strategy, every weapon, every decision the German army took. That means EVERY SINGLE THING Germany achieved during WW2 (conquering France, etc.) it's Hitler's merit whether you wanna admit it or not.
fuckoff989 10 months ago
@fuckoff989 you tickle me,i rarely see people as wrong as you speak with such false confidence.i think you sit down and write these stupid posts of yours while drinking cheap generic whiskey.i'd argue with you,and it would be a cinch,but you're not worth it.I will say this,if he was such a military einstein why did he make soooo many countless mistakes,which resulted in GERMANY BEING BOMBED LITERALLY INTO THE FUCKING STONE AGE?Normally rational people associate "genius" with better results.
dempsey981 10 months ago
@dempsey981 If your intelligence and your knowledge were half as big as your ignorant mouth, you would have already won this debate. I simply LOVE it who you keep whining I'm wrong but yet you haven't pointed out a single mistake, have you? You haven't countered a single one of my facts. Hitler made mistakes? Yep. Napoleon Bonaparte made mistakes. Mistakes which resulted in France losing all its colonies, an economic recession and complete destruction of France. Yet they call him (...)
fuckoff989 10 months ago
@fuckoff989 stalingrad was an excellent example of hitlers genius,operation BARBAROSSA.This was by far the greatest holocaust german defeat in german history[look it up loud mouth bitch].the trained german general staff was ignored repeatedly,and subordinate to hitlers authority.now the end result is clearly obvious total catastrophic failure.not an outcome we associate with genius.yer a lot of rant and no substance the kind of cunt i normally just bitch slap on site.nazi sympathizer shit of bag
dempsey981 10 months ago
@dempsey981 Getting a little bit mad there, bro? Relax... It's okay to be ignorant. You claim Hitler wasn't a genius because ONE of his plans failed? hahaha how about the successful victories over Poland, Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg, Belgium, Holland, FRANCE, Monaco, Yugoslavia, Greece, Lithuania, Danzig, Latvia, Estonia, and even a VAST territory of Russia. Even the British admit London was 2 hours away from defeat before the United States planes arrived. Who achieved all of that? Hitler.
fuckoff989 10 months ago
@fuckoff989 well you got me im out brained,i admitt it,anyone who can over runmega states latvia and estonia,AND MASSIVE MONACO[all 10 sq.meters of it]dynamic norway pop.1.5 million back then,most certainly is beyond ANY doubt, the successor to Hannibal,and in fact a military genius.ill bet he was quite surprised when his devine, genius inspired 1000 YEAR RIECH lasted a grand total of roughly 12 lousy years!Thats about 1 third the time it took to rebuild germany.yup what a genius!!!seig heil
dempsey981 10 months ago
@fuckoff989 man your view of Hitler's military thinking is totaly sugar coated. yes he made many victories IN THE EARLY WAR, but then for some reason or another, be it the drugs or paranoya over being assasinated he progressively became more and mmore unwise. in Stalingrad he lost AN ENTIRE ARMY for a city that had NO millitary advantage, he had Rommel his best field commander shoot himself out of paranoya, he refused to move panzers to normandy eventhough it was obvious thats where invasion was
bh5496 6 months ago
Comment removed
fuckoff989 6 months ago
@dempsey981 Hitler's Generals had a different opinion about some operations? So what? They didn't have HALF of Hitler's knowledge. And they THEMSELVES admitted they were the pupils and not the masters compared to Hitler. Hitler conquered almost the entire Europe and had Russia and the UK in their knees at one point. You can blame him for one or two mistakes. Name me ONE general in HISTORY who never made mistakes! But the fact is Hitler WAS, whether you want to admit it or not, a military genius.
fuckoff989 10 months ago
@fuckoff989 you are so grossly uninformed,with the strongest tendencys to invent facts that i cant continue with you.later komrad
dempsey981 10 months ago
@fuckoff989 u said "you cant blame him for one or two mistakes"haaaaaaa!he lost the entire GERMAN 6TH ARMYYYYYY[the largest army EVER LOST in the entire history of Germany]why in the world could you not blame him for that?He lost the luftwaffe over England,he lost important ukranian sympathizers in the ussr thru murder,ha ha it goes on and on.he made wrong decisions on dropping long range bombers from war productio,and theres not even room here to begin all the tactical fuck ups he meddled in.ha
dempsey981 10 months ago
@dempsey981 Your such a retard. I could sit here all day arguing the mistakes and losses you think Hitler had. But remember if I was to name every victory and accomplishment Hitler did during the war, I'd have to write a thousand comments. But I won't do that because it ALL comes down to the BIG picture. And that tells us a different story.
fuckoff989 10 months ago
@dempsey981 Germany conquered nearly the entire Europe and nearly defeated England AND the Soviet Union fighting TWO fronts AT THE SAME TIME. JUST that itself is an AMAZING accomplishment. The world had to LITERALLY unite to merely compete with the military genius of Adolf Hitler and EVEN STILL it was only out of luck they won (they themselves admit to that).
fuckoff989 10 months ago
@dempsey981 Now explain something to me you retarded cock sucker, if Hitler was a compulsive incompetent mad man who didn't know anything about war, which you were brainwashed to believe in, then HOW in the hell did Germany achieve ALL of that? Because of the German generals? HMMMM but I thought Hitler didn't listen to his Generals right? So who was responsible for the successful invasion of France and everything else?
fuckoff989 10 months ago
@fuckoff989 retarded cock sucker??we cant continue discussing history,but it would be nice to meet you.
dempsey981 10 months ago
@dempsey981 It doesn't matter what you say or how much the truth may hurt you, there is no way in hell you can DENY the military accomplishments of Germany during WW2. That's a FACT. Another FACT is that ONE man was behind all of them. Every tactic, every strategy, every decision, every weapon used, EVERYTHING. If those two facts combined don't make that man a genius, then I don't know what does.
fuckoff989 10 months ago
@dempsey981 Hitler lost? Yeah. Caesar lost. Frederick lost. Napoleon lost too. The difference is that Napoleon didn't have to fight as much countries as Hitler had, Napoleon didn't conquer half as much territory as Hitler did, Napoleon couldn't reach England's territory and Hitler could, Napoleon wasn't even close to defeat England or Russia and Hitler was. Yet Napoleon is considered a military genius and Hitler isn't? lmao get the fuck outta here, fucking fool.
fuckoff989 10 months ago
@dempsey981 a military genius. So if HE was a genius, then why wasn't Hitler? What's the difference? Oh yeah right, the difference is that when Napoleon lost, the All-lies weren't around to write history, you see? Besides, Hitler didn't make a single mistake. His plans were amazing and extremely well thought. They simply went wrong either because of things nobody could predict or because of things he couldn't control. That's why even the Allies themselves ADMIT they had LUCK in World War 2.
fuckoff989 10 months ago
@fuckoff989 wow, hitler didn't make a single mistake, well let's continue our list shall we? switching from millitary to civilian targets during the battle of britain, underestimating the british IN THE FIRST PLACE, he delayed production of the german assault rifle and Me262, and his "no retreat" policies at the end of the war, cost him MANY troops that could have fought another day had they fallen back, but nooo they had to "die for thier fuher."
bh5496 6 months ago
@bh5496 When did I ever say Hitler made no mistakes you brainless dipshit? First of all, THE BRITISH were the ones targeting German civilians you fucking fool. Germany started doing it for revenge. Watch this video and you'll see who was the first one to target civilians, you brainwashed puppet: /watch?v=Bmyn2bQx_qI . Secondly, Hitler was the one who had most ideas regarding Germany's most advanced weaponry. Third, he never said "NO FALLING BACK", he said "NO SURRENDER". Which is different.
fuckoff989 6 months ago
@fuckoff989 wow man you are really fuckin dumb, read the comment that mine REPLIED TO, and you'll see that i quoted your totally ignorant statement "Hitler didn't make a single mistake. " and yes, I DO know that the british bombed first but did Hitler HAVE to switch to civilian targets for revenge? NO HE DIDN'T. hey here's a good idea, keep bombing military targets so that raids into Germany CAN'T HAPPEN ANYMORE.
bh5496 5 months ago
@bh5496 So keep your stupid ignorance to yourself and shut up. Hitler was not a "great general during the beginning". He was the greatest military genius that has ever lived, you brainwashed clown. Go read the testimonies of his Generals about his immeasurable war knowledge. And he did not shoot himself. The All-lies made that up so that the Germans would surrender. Go watch National Geographic's documentary on Hitler's escape. Go read on wikipedia about how the found body was a blatant double.
fuckoff989 6 months ago
@fuckoff989 It was a double. They burned his already charred corpse and threw it overboard at sea. They didn't want anyone or anything to have a shrine to the man. Regardless, the U.S.A. is guilty of the same crimes. One democratic dictatorship defeated an actual dictatorship. Not much was accomplished for the average man aside from the pride or guilt associated with war's end. Make no mistake, the man was psychotic and self-righteous. He was in love with is persona. He mistakeningly was..
mrccarlos1587 5 months ago
@mrccarlos1587 Please spare me of your ignorance. They didn't burn shit. Hitler's body was never found. They lied so that they could say Hitler was a coward. And do NOT compare Hitler's dictatorship to that of the US. Hitler was LOVED by his people. He was in love with his persona? Yeah, he achieved the biggest economic MIRACLE in history, he SINGLE HANDEDLY built the world's number 1 power and he put France, Britain and Russia combined on their knees. And you wanted him to have a small ego?
fuckoff989 5 months ago
@fuckoff989 Ha, are you serious or just playing some kind of game? I hope you don't actually believe that rubbish you are saying? The moron single handedly LOST the war when it could have been won by the greatest military force yet seen! His blunders one right after the other destroyed the true Germany! German heritage and culture lost because of his terrible military , dipolomatic and production blunders! Konigsberg, Breslau, Stettin ... all lost because of him!
lonewulf44 5 months ago in playlist More videos from allinaday
@fuckoff989 ..a drug addict. Opiates deteriorate your mind and judgement. This was clear towards the end, he allowed Germany to become a burial ground. He should have sought a diplomatic end once Germany lost Stalingrad. He would have been executed either way but at least would have saved the country from annihilation from allied bombers.
mrccarlos1587 5 months ago
@mrccarlos1587 besides that, Hitler DID seek a diplomatic end LONG before Stalingrad, you retard. He proposed several peace treaties to Britain and he even offered Germany's military services to protect England's colonies worldwide. He said since the VERY BEGINNING "All we want is to be left alone". Churchill was the mentally sick one who refused any sort of peace request by Germany. So again, please stop talking about stuff you know nothing about.
fuckoff989 5 months ago
@fuckoff989 Greatest military genious that has ever lived? LOL!!!!! Are you kidding me? Dunkirk, DoW USA, Me-262 jet delay, USSR friendly population option, Kursk , Ukraine deployment in 41, No African support, and on and on. The moron basically snatched defeat from the jaws of victory! Half the times you wonder if the idiot was TRYING to lose the war with some of his stupid decisions.
lonewulf44 5 months ago in playlist More videos from allinaday
@lonewulf44 That's what Wilhelm Keitel, Supreme Command of the German Armed Forces, said when asked to describe Hitler's immeasurable knowledge concerning war. And that's just half of it. Plus there are more quotes from other German generals which I find no need to post. So you do your search, idiot. That said, once again I repeat, YES Hitler DID make mistakes. He wouldn't be human if he didn't, but when you say Germany was the greatest power yet seen, please note you are praising Hitler. ;)
fuckoff989 5 months ago
@fuckoff989 Think about who you are using to describe the man .... W. Keitel ... the biggest and most worthless 'yes man' who led absolutely nothing during the war, and kept his appointed position by ONLY never using whatever strategic sense he had. Lets look at Manstein's views on Hitler? Or Guderian perhaps? Proven masters of their occupation and see their opinion of the man and his abilities. Mistakes are one thing, but some of his blunders defy simple strategic common sense.
lonewulf44 5 months ago
@fuckoff989 I will never preaise Hitler! The man destroyed the true and historically great Germany! That culture and heritage were stolen and killed by his blunders and brainless actions. Konigsberg, Stetten, Elbing, Breslau ... all lost due to him! I respect, research, and can appreciate aspects of the German army and armed forces ... but Hitler only gets credit for hindering and hampering and ultimately destroying those forces!
lonewulf44 5 months ago
@lonewulf44 ...you west germans were lucky that right after WW2 you have a man named Conrad Adenuer to put your country back towards prosperity...For the East germans, that's a different story...Had Hitler not been greedy,by attacking France and England, he would have a true Festung Europa...
010bobby 4 months ago
@010bobby England and France declared war on germany, not the other way round. After all and even the most generous offers to the poles failed, and they kept on slaughtering the german minority, Hitler saw himself forced to end that msiery. It was england and france that turned a local polish/german conflict into a world war. Never forget that.
TheNonConformative 4 months ago
@TheNonConformative Your point is baseless..Every country in Europe has minority germans..USA has minority Germans..France has minority germans...so, you are saying is Hitler is going to conquer the whole world because of german minorities everywhere..Don't you think that is a questionable thinking? Like Saddam did conquer Kuwait because there were minority Iraquis there? C,mon now you are blaming someone else for Hitler's stupid ambition...England and France declared war coz of a treaty..
010bobby 4 months ago
@010bobby Hitler didnt want to conquer the world. Thats propaganda of the west to justify the bloodshed they caused.
TheNonConformative 4 months ago
@TheNonConformative Oh Yeah..you could have fooled me..Let see, Austria,Rhineland Poland,czeck,Hungary,Greece,most of scandinavian countries, Bavaria,Ukraine,Georgia, Lavtia,North Africa,Sicily,Italy, He even had plans to conquer USA until the US and UK stop him in the west and Russia stop him in the east...what are you gonna say to that? my friend you need to study history especially Hitler's wars
010bobby 4 months ago
@010bobby David Irving, Marc Weber, Faurisson,Buchanan,... I have learned enough about Hitler´s to tell, that your post is full of hogwash.
TheNonConformative 4 months ago
@TheNonConformative ...these people you mentioned are fantasy writers..if you want to read a real book..go to the library and check out the book...History of the second WW2...that will settle our argument..beside what is Hitler doing attacking these weak countries? Just for fun i guess? Answer that please..
010bobby 4 months ago
@010bobby Why did Hitler want to conquer so many countries?
goody1boo 4 months ago
@goody1boo ..Because he wants to start a German empire he called 1,000 year Reich! that is why...
010bobby 4 months ago
@010bobby Well, even after attacking and defeating France ... the fool corporal had many options at his table. He basically chose one wrong turn after the other and blundered his way to destruction sucking the entire nation and culture down with him. Sigh ... Poor Konigsberg, Poor Breslau ...
lonewulf44 4 months ago
@fuckoff989 hey, how did he escape, can you tell me? I want the truth, I hate lies
alynwhite 5 months ago
@alynwhite Watch this documentary by the History channel called "Hitler's escape": /watch?v=iCyfiG7aTB4 . It's complete on youtube. That's just ONE OF the thousands of lies the All-lies wrote in history regarding Hitler and WW2. The Germans were obsessively in love with Hitler, they were willing to follow him to hell if needed. Lying Hitler committed suicide was the only way they could make the Germans surrender and inventing the Holocaust was the only way they could make them stop loving him.
fuckoff989 5 months ago
@fuckoff989 hahah, stupid russians. as usual. what can you expect from some vodka drinkers, they had the skull of a woman. But if all this is true, then the stupid relatives of Hitler that live in America must be tested so we know if the blood on the sofa was really his or not
alynwhite 5 months ago
@bh5496 Hitler didn't wanna fight the British, it was Churchill the idiot who first attacked german civvies
alynwhite 5 months ago
@alynwhite HUh? The British made it know they wouldn't allow a Polish invasion ... Hitler called their bluff and it wasn't a bluff? Thus he made the fight , his choice. Granted England should have let the Poles fend for themselves but thats another topic. As for civvies .... I think Polish civvies can attest to who first 'started' that ... but is irrelevent as in total war all sides can be accused of things in hindsight.
lonewulf44 5 months ago