humans account for 4% of co2 emissions the rest is natural,the sun is causing this "global warming"
what the tree huggers wont tell you is that every other planet in the solar system is warming so how are suv's and coal fired power staions causing this?!?
Wake up hippies!! if they get this tax through it will only go up & up!!.
it has already ruined NZ! dont let them fool you!!
Are u guys gonna try to control climate change in the rest of the galaxy as well because its not just our planet thats heating up and it has nothing to do with us, its the sun.
@iamLSD1 The sun's output has barely changed since 1970 and is irrelevant to recent global warming. Check out the website 'Skeptical Science' for more information.
I cannot even begin on how inane, smug and offensive this is. And moreover, how it so perfectly typifies the deep green response to the climate issue. Anybody who doesn't accept your position is seen not only as someone you disagree with, but as someone who is actively and maliciously trying to hurt the world; not someone to be debated but instead despised and ridiculed.
Also, you're so young! Trust me, in a few years you will look back at this video and cringe.
I love how these people believe they are better than everyone else by pushing the idea they are more cultured and smarter than the average person. I bet anyone who questions climate change with get their Comments Removed like so many others.
hehehehehehehehehehe. this scared me slightly. wait... so if i don't act on climate change i'll find myself coming out of a wardrobe, facing a bunch of climate-change-fighting wizards, and then being publicly humiliated by then having a spell cast on me that replaces my clothes with a surf-life-saving outfit? geez i'd better do something :O
Much people take inaction, it's those multinational oil company's funding those 5% scientists who disagree and putting them in nice suits in News channels.
Oh and I hope you have even more fun ignoring the fact that the entire alarmist culture is based around consensus fuelled by 'scientists' with monetary ties to their side of the debate. Because there's SO much money to be made in disagreeing, right?
Skeptics are the minority, they are unsupported on nearly every front in this debate. So whatever, have fun being a deluded, ostentatious child.
@ITentacledYourBaby [the funding of scientists to disagree] does happen in the climate change 'debate', did happen also in the smoking/lung cancer 'debate', and is documented in recent books 'Merchants of Doubt' and 'Climate Cover-Up'.
Perhaps you should expand your literary experience and spend even a few minutes reading 'Heaven + Earth'.
There is no money to be made in skepticism, whereas supporting the anthropogenic climate change theory is endlessly profitable.
If you're really as well-read as you like to present yourself as, you should probably know that the alarmist's theories on climate change have been completely disproved a number of times, the only thing holding up your side of the argument is consensus
The science has spoken, you just can't claim there are vested interests to fund climate science. It comes from all the research and analysis; and considering you've never worked within a research field is pure insult to claim that it's all just for money.
It's not about what is easy, or what makes more money. A serious question is being asked here. Most people who claim they've got it all sorted out haven't even looked at the large amass of evidence.
This has been flagged as spam show
humans account for 4% of co2 emissions the rest is natural,the sun is causing this "global warming"
what the tree huggers wont tell you is that every other planet in the solar system is warming so how are suv's and coal fired power staions causing this?!?
Wake up hippies!! if they get this tax through it will only go up & up!!.
it has already ruined NZ! dont let them fool you!!
pheonixrising789 7 months ago
Are u guys gonna try to control climate change in the rest of the galaxy as well because its not just our planet thats heating up and it has nothing to do with us, its the sun.
iamLSD1 1 year ago
@iamLSD1 The sun's output has barely changed since 1970 and is irrelevant to recent global warming. Check out the website 'Skeptical Science' for more information.
drillvoice 1 year ago 2
@drillvoice we lost global cloud cover though.
SirTorment 1 year ago
I cannot even begin on how inane, smug and offensive this is. And moreover, how it so perfectly typifies the deep green response to the climate issue. Anybody who doesn't accept your position is seen not only as someone you disagree with, but as someone who is actively and maliciously trying to hurt the world; not someone to be debated but instead despised and ridiculed.
Also, you're so young! Trust me, in a few years you will look back at this video and cringe.
burbleful 1 year ago
@burbleful I agree. I can't believe that Animal Farm was so rude about pigs, either.
drillvoice 1 year ago
hahahaha this is brilliant guys!! Well done :D
pollytree 1 year ago
I love how these people believe they are better than everyone else by pushing the idea they are more cultured and smarter than the average person. I bet anyone who questions climate change with get their Comments Removed like so many others.
AdnanCucak 1 year ago
hehehehehehehehehehe. this scared me slightly. wait... so if i don't act on climate change i'll find myself coming out of a wardrobe, facing a bunch of climate-change-fighting wizards, and then being publicly humiliated by then having a spell cast on me that replaces my clothes with a surf-life-saving outfit? geez i'd better do something :O
thisisnotahand1 1 year ago
BEST EVER!!!! oh wow, i love this so much. guys just so proud.
pepperfoley 1 year ago
Much people take inaction, it's those multinational oil company's funding those 5% scientists who disagree and putting them in nice suits in News channels.
cypress1337 1 year ago
@cypress1337
This doesn't happen. Enjoy being delusional.
Oh and I hope you have even more fun ignoring the fact that the entire alarmist culture is based around consensus fuelled by 'scientists' with monetary ties to their side of the debate. Because there's SO much money to be made in disagreeing, right?
Skeptics are the minority, they are unsupported on nearly every front in this debate. So whatever, have fun being a deluded, ostentatious child.
ITentacledYourBaby 1 year ago
@ITentacledYourBaby [the funding of scientists to disagree] does happen in the climate change 'debate', did happen also in the smoking/lung cancer 'debate', and is documented in recent books 'Merchants of Doubt' and 'Climate Cover-Up'.
drillvoice 1 year ago
@drillvoice
Perhaps you should expand your literary experience and spend even a few minutes reading 'Heaven + Earth'.
There is no money to be made in skepticism, whereas supporting the anthropogenic climate change theory is endlessly profitable.
If you're really as well-read as you like to present yourself as, you should probably know that the alarmist's theories on climate change have been completely disproved a number of times, the only thing holding up your side of the argument is consensus
ITentacledYourBaby 1 year ago 2
@ITentacledYourBaby
The science has spoken, you just can't claim there are vested interests to fund climate science. It comes from all the research and analysis; and considering you've never worked within a research field is pure insult to claim that it's all just for money.
It's not about what is easy, or what makes more money. A serious question is being asked here. Most people who claim they've got it all sorted out haven't even looked at the large amass of evidence.
ctconquest 1 year ago
Great idea guys!!!!!!
princessskins 1 year ago
this is one of the most wonderful things i have ever seen
occulusreparo 1 year ago
Comment removed
AdnanCucak 1 year ago
AHH I love it so much!!!
123RBJ4 1 year ago
Oh if only it were that easy.
Joel, you look more like Wolverine each time I see you.
fuscousstave 1 year ago
@fuscousstave Well I needed to look a bit like Professor Lupin, and he is a werewolf, so what choice did I have?
drillvoice 1 year ago
ahah
awesome.
jessicarhs 1 year ago
>implying apathy is an even halfway decent exemplification of counter-alarmist behaviour.
ITentacledYourBaby 1 year ago
lol i reckon the boggart is like andrew bolt, that is, ridiculous.
drillvoice 1 year ago