May 14 1948, the Jews proclaimed the independence of the reborn state of Israel. Ish 66:8 a nation born in a day, Jesus said His coming would be soon after this event which he also foretold and is fulfilled in YOUR seeing. study Matt 24:32. Today Israel is one of the most agriculturally efficient lands on earth fulfilling Isaiah's prophecy in Ish 27:6, 35:7. A once desolate land now filling the earth with large exports of fruit, plants etc, in these Last Days as foretold
Did God scatter His people,Jews,around the whole planet because of thier disobedience?Yes,fulfilled,check any encyclopedia.And check Levit 26:33, Deut 28:37, 63,64,65. Jer 29:18, Luke 21:24.Did God, during these Last Days, regather His people back into their homeland after nearly 2k years of exile,Yes,He Has, but in unbelief until the full measure of Gentiles are drawn into Gods kingdom.Genesis 13:15,Isaiah 43:5-6,Jeremiah 31:7-8,Ezekiel 36:24, Amos 9:15, Zephaniah 3:20,Matt 24:32. May 14 1948
Dr. Harold Urey, a Nobel Prize winner for his research in chemistry, wrote about the impossibility of evolution, but still admitted he believed in the theory! He then added the words, "we believe as an article of faith that life evolved from dead matter on this planet. It is just that its complexity is so great, it is hard for us to imagine that it did." His admission proved that his acceptance of evolution was not based on logic or evidence, but on blind faith.
Some fool once said that the spread of Christianity would slow down or stop, without giving any evidence for this stupid claim. However in China ALONE ten thousand new Christian believers come to faith in Christ every day. One just has to type in, the gospel spreading in China, to see for themselves. However, type in a country, any country that has not yet heard the gospel and it will be hard to do so. Jesus said his words would be preached to the ENTIRE world, yes, fulfilled in our seeing.
The Treasury of the snow: Not until the microscope did man discover that each snowflake is like a unique symmetrical treasure. Just like a fingerprint, no two are alike. To the Creator God this was no surprise when He asked Job in chapter 38 verse 22, Have you (entered into) the treasures of the snow? Not until our modern day was this amazing fact brought to light... And cannot be refuted..
A reader's digest article in Nov 1982 described a fascinating discovery by the researchers at NASA's Ames Research Center that confirmed the Bible's account that every single element found in the human body exists within the soil. The scientists concluded, "We are just beginning to learn. The biblical scenario for the creation of life turns out to be not far off the mark." Genesis 2:7, 3:19 Job 10:9 Carbon 18% Hydrogen 10% Nitrogen 3.3% Calcium 1.5% Phosphorous 1.2% Potassium 0.2% & Sulphur 0.2%
@nickmorrison1100 Ohhhh, the @rhyce21 you've been bashing about their religion on several YouTube vids! You're too fucking stupid to assume. You aint as good as a hacker as I am that's for sure. Know what Phil, just coz I'm bored out of my mind, let me tell you one thing...you're being watched. Nyahahahahahahahahahaha!!! Well, my time's up. I'll be logged in soon...till next time Phil Keenan aka nickmorrison1100, mackboomer and sonic shit.
Than i suppose you have yet to encounter an authentic Christ-like being, that sticks with an imperfect being through the trials of life to overcome them victoriously & leave them so impacted, they die to their own will & live for His divine perfect will. <3
John 3:7 You Must Be Born Again originalwriting.ie Use this book to share the gospel to unbelievers. Contains prophecy related topics concerning Israel and Christ. This book also speaks about spirit mediums, the false teaching of purgatory and discusses scientific facts discovered in the bible long before modern science. This book, God willing, will help you win souls.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Everything you said is bullshit. There is no God and science has been verifying this for centuries now. Get out of fairyland and into the real world. Thanks.
@nickmorrison1100 You are such a funny "little" man. Even Richard Dawkins has given in to the fact that the existence of God is a possibility. Who are you anyway little man? lols..... Thanks. For nothing "kind fellow."
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Who said that they didn't believe that the existence of God is a possibility? Not me. There is a chance...though it's extremely small. Science has shown that he doesn't exist, but there's still an EXTREMELY small chance. There is no evidence for God and science continually proves the Bible incorrect. None of us have "given into the fact" that he is possible, because we are rational persons and know that nobody can know anything 100%.
@nickmorrison1100 Extreamly "small", says "you," again. How big is the Universe anyway. What is small, is you and I and science has not shown that the existence of God is not possible by any measure of your imagination! The Bible is full of scientific knowledge in a non scientific language, if you read it through you would discover some amazing facts. Which modern day science has supposedly discoverd in recent years.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Only a brainwashed individual would foolishly believe that the Bible is "full of scientific kowledge". That is perhaps one of the biggest falsehoods that can ever be stated by any person. Science has shown that God does not exist, with no evidence that he does. Again, I never said that science shows it's not possible, but science has so far shown that God does not exist. If you want us to believe otherwise, please submit some evidence.
@PropertyOfHoliness Miracle healings are bullshit. Except for the munchkin fairies that live in my backyard. I once accidentally broke my wrist while masturbating, and all they did was sprinkle some fairy dust on it and they patched that baby up. What, you don't believe me? My wrist is proof, but I don't have to give you evidence, you just have to have faith.
@nickmorrison1100 Well, from what i've witnessed in prayers for people to get healed right on the spot, i'm convinced you haven't experienced a real miracle healing bro.
@PropertyOfHoliness Oh that's not true! There was once this woman who had three breasts, and she prayed to our wonderful Monkey God to remove one of the breasts, and after praying, it completely disappeared. In fact, our Monkey God is so loving, that he placed that breast on another woman who lost one of hers due to cancer. And I have proof of this. 500 persons witnessed this happen. There is no way to dispute this bro.
@nickmorrison1100 Only a brainwashed fool? Have you eximined the Bible for yourself, or are you speaking from ignorance as is clear here. So you say that Science has shown that God does not exist, because there is no evidence. What evidence have you that he doesn't exist? Only a fool would say that science has so far proved that God does not exist. Evidence No.1 The Earth is suspended in space, Bible verse, Job 26:7 plus 22:14, 26:10, 38:14, the rotation of the Earth also and its globe shape.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Yes, only a brainwashed fool would believe this shit. I did indeed examine the Bible for myself and that is how I know that the Bible is inaccurate and immoral, and that God is evil. I don’t need evidence to believe that God doesn’t exist. If I told you I believed in the Monkey God, would you require yourself to have evidence in order to not believe in him? Of course you wouldn’t. That would be silly. It’s also silly to believe in God with no evidence, and there is none.
@nickmorrison1100 What do you find inaccurate and immoral about the Bible and God's judgement which constantly hangs above sinners who rebel in the face of evidence? Show Me please. If all your thoughts were put up on a large screen for all to see, we would soon see what is really immoral in your heart, compared to God's righteous judgement against sin in the bible. Dont kid yourself, you with your dark heart and sinful thoughts, trying to be God's judge. The bible is my evidence, No 2 is next
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 My Monkey God will judge your puny Christian God, and your god will be thrown in Monkey Hell where he will be raped by elephants for an eternity. On a related note, the Bible teaches a young Earth, that animals didn't evolve, that the Earth is flat, that there are deities, it teaches magic, and etc, etc. It's bullshit. All these things we know are incorrect.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 And yes, God is evil. His Bible commands his followers to harm, torture, and kill the innocent. He is unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful, and unjust. His lust for blood and pain is unmatched by any other. Every person who has ever lived is more moral than him. If we were to compare all of the bad and good things that God has done with everything that humans have done, God would lose, and lose bad. As immoral as you probably are, even you are better than this jerk.
@nickmorrison1100 Matthew Maury,an officer who served in the U S Navy is considered the father of oceanography and hydrography. Reading his bible he noticed Psalms 8:8 “paths of the seas.” Because of Maury’s belief in the scriptures his research led him to discover the ocean’s paths of warm and cold continental currents.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Lol. I love how you Christians can learn to interpret anything written to mean whatever you want. This is how you are able to read passages in the Bible like where God would force parents to eat their own children, and you still call this guy loving. I suppose if there was a verse in the Bible that talked about bad smells in the air, you'd claim that the Bible contained scientific knowledge of farts!
@nickmorrison1100 Whatever I want? lol's Evidence No 3. The Ocean Springs at the Bottom of the Deep Proverbs 8:28. The Mountains at the Bottom of the Deep Jonah 2:6. Only in recent years has man discovered the mountains at the bottom of the deep such as the Mariana's trench etc.. so were does God force parents to eat their young? what passages are these you dont quote?
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Lol. Mountains under the ocean is DIVINELY inspired science? Are you kidding me? Anyone living on a mountainous island knew there were mountains under the sea. And since modern humans have been around for a few hundred thousand years, that kind of knowledge isn't that impressive to have just a few thousand years ago. Show me in the Bible where it talks about atomic particles, & then I'll be impressed. Lol.
@nickmorrison1100 And How would they observe these mountains at the "bottom" of the deep, Sheol the pit, which is where these mountains were described as being located. Give me a break.... Tell me, prehistoric man built megalithic monuments, made beautiful vave paintings and kept records of lunar phases. Why would he wait a thousand centuries before using the same skills to record history? The Biblical time scale is much more likely.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 What are you talking about? Anyone who has seen a mountain popping out of the ocean (islands anyone) would surely have a brain intelligent enough to tell them that there must be mountains under the water. Lol. Sheol the Pit? What does a hypothetical state of mind for the dead have to do with proving that there are mountains in the ocean? You are really stretching the already pathetic attempts at reality that the Bible offers. Say something intelligent please.
@nickmorrison1100 There you go, just like a typical evolutionist. (Anyone who has seen a mountain popping out of the ocean (islands anyone) would surely have a brain intelligent enough to tell them that there ((must))(lol's) be mountains under the water) Says who,YOU LoL's.This might not be so. One would not state a fact unless one has seen the evidence, unless your a complete mug. Mountains coming out of the water, would be any land mass, and does not describe to us vast underwater ranges.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 All this stuff is being written down from the imaginations of the authors. The things they write are very non-specific, yet when someone discovers something in the world that even only somewhat relates to a passage in the Bible, you jump up with excitement and believe without thinking, that the Bible told of a scientific breakthrough, when in reality, it was nothing of the sort. Your emotional need for God to be real is making you believe things without reason. Wake up!
@nickmorrison1100 like I said the bible's main purpose is not to give scientific information, however when the bible does touch upon matters relating to science they are stunningly accurate.. Yes always accurate. You have yet to refute any of the evidence brought forth. The Earth suspended in space, being globe shaped etc.. And still waiting for your greek historical references relating to the earth suspended in space, the Hydrological Cycle etc..
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 You're correct. The Bible's main purpose is to deceive. And no, the Bible is extremely inaccurate. Teaching that the Earth is flat is not an "accurate" thing to teach. Teaching that there is a paradise where you'll go after you die if you believe in a god is also not accurate. It's a book of fantasy...and it's a wonderful fantasy, it's just not the truth.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 I also find it amazing that you want me to provide evidence for you, when not only do I do that, but you have yet to provide any evidence yourself. You have not been able to refute anything I said, and when you are confronted with the evidence, you ignore it. The Bible is the best evidence for every argument I make, and to refute every one you make as well.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 If you want to know how the Bible teaches a flat earth, read it! If you want to know how unscientific the Bible is, read it! If you want to know how evil God is, or if you want to know why Christians are so delusional, read the Bible! But most Christians don't read the Bible. Either that, or they have already been programmed to justify immorality and inaccuracy when they do. But it's like I always say, you can lead a Christian to evidence, but you can't make him think.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Yes, prehistoric man did build monuments and made beautiful paintings, but your numbers are WAY off. No one waited a "thousand centuries" to record history. Where did you get that? Using these skills for survival were more important than recording history, especially when they didn't have much history to even write about yet.
@nickmorrison1100 You say, Using these skills for survival were more important than recording history, especially when they didn't have much history to even write about yet. Says Who, YOU again. How do you know at what age history became important enough to write about. I would believe all history would be important to those living at that time. Yet 6k years of "written" History best suits the biblicial time frame.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 At that time, persons didn't even have a language to use you idiot. That kind of technology didn't exist yet and it took several thousand years just to invent a very primitive one...and the language that they first created could not adequately record the history you think they could. And even if they could, it's not like they could just go down to OfficeMax and pick up some pens and paper. These guys were too busy looking for food and shelter, and running from bears.
@nickmorrison110 Again, HOW DO YOU KNOW, they didnt have a language. What waffle are you reading? Do you know how many languages are in ther world today? Tell me, at what time was each one created and how did they come about. Again, How do you know if they were to "busy" to write anything down, such waffle doesnt even comply with the laws of logic. 6 - 10 k years fits perfectly with recorded history and the birth of lauguages fits with Babel as recorded in the Bible
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Our knowledge comes from what the evidence tells us. We know that humans have been around for millions of years, yet we only have a written history of about 6,000 years. So obviously, the evidence shows us that they didn't have a language until around that recently. Like evolution, a complex technology would obviously take many years to develop.
@nickmorrison1100 Again, how many years would it take for six thousand languages to "spring forth." Your idea of evolution is based in myth. Every missing transitional link from ape "like" creature to man doesnt exist. Only in the brains of the deceived. If pressed about mans ancestry, I would hav to say that all we have is a hugh question mark, nothing truthful in transitional specie to man. Richard Leakey, world's formost Paleoanthropologist... Complex technology, lol's
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Again, it took millions of years for humans to develop a language, and a few hundred thousand years for homosapiens to develop a language. Every missing transitional link from ape "like" creature to man doesn't exist, because every time we find one, it creates two more. Lol. What you have to do is look at the beautiful transitional web of fossils that we already have, which more than verifiies transition. You are believing lies from Christian programmers.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Being busy has nothing to do with logic, but rationality. Early humans did not have the knowledge or technology to develop a complex language adequate enough to write down history, and this is what you're choosing to ignore. And again, of course 6-10 k years fits the Bible, because that is around the time when the Bible was starting to be written, just like the rest of written history. You're only proving my point when you say that.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Plus, history and other religious texts were written BEFORE any Jewish texts. If your Biblical view fits so perfectly, you'd think that the earliest writings would consist of God and stuff, and yet they are of other religions.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 You're way of thinking says that humans just popped into existence out of nothing and already knew how to speak and write. We know that this didn't happen because humans have been around for millions of years and there has only been written records going back a few thousand years, which means it took them millions of years to develop the technology to record history, which makes sense because humans aren't born with a language.
@nickmorrison1100 Humans have been around for millions of years now : ) your starting to make so much sence. Millions of years and then all of a sudden, Thousands of complex languages, with written records going back no more than 6k years ago.. This speaks of a biblicial time frame, not millions of years. All paleontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms [link from one anmal type to another] Stephen J Gould... Why cant you except truth
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 It wasn't all of a sudden. A millions years didn't go by and then all of a sudden persons started to write. Simple words began to develop among human peoples which helped them to cooperate to survive, such as when hunting and gathering, planting, and building structures. Such languages were forming from several different parts of the world as different peoples were spreading out from Africa. They started out as only simple words, nothing complex.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 As many thousand years passed, the languages became more complex and they began to form languages in written form. But such primitive languages were insufficient to record such long periods of history and there was insufficient technology to do it. This all added to the reasons why it took so long before writing started to become somewhat common.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Of course this fits the Biblical time frame, because Jewish texts were among the first early accounts to be written down...along with Hindu scriptures, which even predate the Jewish ones. There are texts which are even older, and cave writings which are even older than that. So in a sense, the earliest of writings even clearly show that humans existed way before Judasim was even invented, so it's not exactly a perfect fit like you want to believe.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 This is all common sense stuff to normal persons who don't fall into the hands of psychological programming predators. You are under the programming of Christian predators who have turned you into a robot, and you will act and sound like a retard for the rest of your life. I feel sorry for you, because even though you're stupid, you're really a victim. This is why Christianity has to die, and I'm so happy that it is. Embrace atheism.
@nickmorrison1100 Says who, you again, you are so funny..... They didnt have this nor that, how the crap do you know what they had "20" or so thousand years ago. Can you pin pint the beginning of any language? out of the thousands which exist today. How do you know they couldnt record history at any time in the past. Smell the BS from here. Your guessing game holds no weight. Watch the evidence for the ORIGINAL tower of BABEL watch?v=tuDnVcDnFJY
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 All scientists know this because that is what the evidence tells them. You on the other hand wish to believe only what you want to believe, so persons like you make videos about fairytales such as the Tower of Babel, which is a cute story for children, but are made only to deceive, and it works on weak minds such as yours. The idea that humans just popped out of nowhere with ready to speak languages is good for fiction, but bad for persons who wish to live in reality.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Recording history wasn't exactly a priority back then, but I guess according to you, human beings were more likely to sit by the campfire and write down how their day went before they had something to eat. Get real. And please open a science book.
@nickmorrison1100 And again, you were there at the camp fire tellin fairy tales of "macro evolution." : ) Continuous transitional sequences [showing the evolution of a form without any missing links] are not merely rare, but are virtually absent. so says, George Gaylord Simpson, professor of zoology ay Columbia University and curator of the department of Geology and Paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History... But you, in wilful ignorance know better, NOT.....
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 In a way, we were at the campfire, because we have gone into the past by looking at what the evidence tells us, not the fairytales that fictional books say. Continuous transitional sequences are prevalent in the fossil record, but Christians choose to ignore this evidence, just like what you continue to do. You have no evidence for creation, and you ignore the evidence for evolution. But you have to in order to convince yourself of nonsense.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 You can only start recording history when you have the tools, the time, and the motive to do it! It took many thousand years for homo-sapiens to develop the technology and such. And if you weren't such an idiot, you would understand that of course 6,000 years of recorded history fits the Bible, because that's when the Biblical accounts were starting to be recorded! Duh! And you know what, so were other ancient religions like Hinduism. Please...open that science book.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Further more, the same skills used for building monuments and making paintings were not the same skills needed for recording history. To do so, you need a language, and language is an extremely sophisticated technology. It is no wonder why it took so long for humans to develop this skill, and it is more because of this reason, the length of time which it took to develop a language, that it took so long for them to record their history.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Remember that it took thousands of years just for humanity to develop homo-sapiens, and so too was language a slowly developing skill. Think about it. First of all, a language needed to be invented, and it needed to be understood by an entire people. They didn’t have the technology to properly record and teach such languages the way we do today. And even then, spoken language needed to be converted into written language.
@nickmorrison1100 Again, quoting without evidence for your developing into homo-sapiens. You havent seen the videos then by Mick Riddle /watch?v=dFsA40euG6E let him wreck your micro "evolved" brain which you cannot trust to determin truth...
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 So you need evidence to prove that language isn't something that a human just knows when they are born? Lol. You ask for evidence for the most obvious things, and yet you accept everything you do believe, including the most ridiculous of things, on faith, without evidence. And you've already sent me to a bogus video which purposely lied about Richard Dawkin's interview, so how can I trust you to send me to another video?
@nickmorrison1100 I never sent you the original video, I offered you a copy of the original video, which is still up for grabs. Again, for the wilful ignorant, its called, from a Frog to a Prince. Scientists who study the origin of languages, called philologists, hav concluded that it is probable that the thousands of dialects and languages throughout the planet can be traced back to an original language in mans ancient past. Pro Alfredo Tombetti claims that he can prove the common origin of all
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 I already saw that video, and it intentionally deceives the viewers by editing footage to make it look like Richard Dawkins was stumped by a question, when in fact he was not. This is what Christians do. They deceive. The entire Chrsitian religion is one giant deception. And you being fooled by this video proves it.
@nickmorrison1100 If dawkins wasnt stumped, prehaps you can answer the question which left him DUMB founded. Can you give an example of that positive ("randon" "accidental" macro mutation) Which you believe is "meaningful", rm a meaningless randon act, that or which adds new information to the genome...
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Dawkins wasn't stumped. You and the rest of your easily fooled Christian kind have been tricked into believing that he was aksed this question and then couldn't answer it. That was the result of cut and paste editing to deceive everyone, and to try and make evolution look bad. That is what you Creationists have to resort to in order to defend your fairytale. Richard Dawkins has already answered this question.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 "Scientists who study the origin of languages, called philologists, hav concluded that it is probable that the thousands of dialects and languages throughout the planet can be traced back to an original language in mans ancient past."
If that was true, it would only compliment the theory of evolution, and does nothing to support your creation idea.
@nickmorrison1100 languages. Max Mueller, one one of the greatest oriental language scholars, declared that all human languages can be traced back to one single original language. Pro Otto Jesperson stated that the first language was given to man by God. (Joseph Free, Archeology and Bible History.. Men more intelligent than you my friend on languages see the connection from Genesis, 6k years ago for the birth of all languages. So pick on them and be put in your place.Babel, tongue tower Genesis
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 And yet there are many more intelligent men than this guy as well as you, that say the idea of God giving man a language is complete bullshit. There is no evidence for that. It makes sense for all languages to have some relation to one parent language, because when humans were evolving, they all came from one ancestor from one place. Your attempt to prove Biblical bullshit is only helping to prove evolution. Good job sir.
@nickmorrison1100 One ancestor which your missing links for. You on a turn table spewing out the same waffle on every reply. You know nothing about the origin of languages yet go on like an expert, so funny...
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 In other words, since you already sent me to a video full of lies, how can I trust any video you show me? Any video you want me to watch will probably just be full of lies like the first one. By sending me to the first deceitful video, you don't have the credibility for me to trust you to watch another one.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 The first written languages consisted of ideogram pictographs, only about a thousand, very inefficient for telling long epics like you seem to think they should have been capable of. Heck, I’m actually surprised they were able to pull it off as early as they did. The Biblical time scale is more likely? Bull shit. Yeah, I’m sure it’s much more plausible that humans were just born with the ability to speak and write like the Bible suggests. Again…bullshit.
"And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat." - Leviticus 26:29
"And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters." - Deuteronomy 28:53
"And I will cause them to eat the flesh of their sons and the flesh of their daughters, and they shall eat every one the flesh of his friend." - Jeremiah 19:9
Face it. Your god is one evil and sadistic son of a bitch. If anyone deserves Hell, it's HIM.
@nickmorrison1100 If you read these verses within there context you would see that, God will judge His people in reguard to their sin, if they obey God He will Bless them, if the turn from God (to idols and witchcraft etc) He will take away their blessing so that disease, terror, invasion and captivity will consue them. During famine, they will have to resort to cannibalism. God does not make them eat their young. There wickedness which was always far worse than Gods judgement is clear.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Nice attempt to once again find a clever way of twisting scripture to mean what you want it to, but all you did was prove to me and everyone else that what I said is correct. God is evil enough to force parents to eat their very own children. Thank you for clarifying that. And yes, forcing parents to eat their own children is EVIL. God is evil. What sick fuck would force parents to eat their own children?! Only a sick evil god, that's who...
@nickmorrison1100 I dont have to twist them, the thousands of biblical scolars who are more learned than you have already agreed to what these verse say and mean. I dont need to hear your super imposed point of false view. When I read these verses within their context they are self explanatory, I know my bible... Again, look at your own thoughs in a "mirror" AND WE WILL SOON SEE what evil is and were it comes form....
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 These "scolars" are more "learned"? Lol. Your so-called "scholars" are nothing more than theological bullshitters who have brainwashed your weak brain...a brain belonging to someone who can't spell or use proper grammar, & still believes in fairytales & magic. Not to mention, you're easily fooled by videos that lie to their viewers. Face it, you're a victim of these persons, but you're too stupid to admit it to yourself, let alone a smarter person like me. True evil is God.
@nickmorrison1100 it is your weak brain which thinks we arrived here by fairy scum of millions of years without evidence. Applying darwin's test to the ultra-complex world of molecular machinery and cellular systems that have been discovered over the past 40 years, we can say that darwin's theory" has 'absolutely broken down'. Michael Behe biochemist, Darwins black box. Now go catch some fairy dust "evidence" to the contrary dear friend. and put the experts including some of your friends 2 shame
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Evolutionists believe they arrived from "fairy scum"? Lol. You're not playing with a full deck, are you...? Lol. Darwin's test? Lol. Scientific experiments have only strengthened Darwin's theory of evolution, which is why it is considered a fact in today's world. Darwin said at the time of forming his theory that while he couldn't prove everything at the time, the future would provide the necessary evidence, & that's exactly what happened. Darwin was right. Evolution's real.
@nickmorrison1100 you keep using the word evidence, a sample is long over due. prehaps a "missing" link to support your waffle ? or an intermediate fossil of some sort. listen to M behe, darwin is finished
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Considering the fact that you were fooled by the videos which cut and past Dawkins footage to make it look like he was stumped by a question, I have no doubt that you would be fooled by Creationists who make up claims that tests are proving evolution to be incorrect. The fact is, everyday we find new evidence to support evolution, which is already considered a fact in the scientific and normal community. Everyone else who ignores the evidence is either a nut or a retard.
@nickmorrison1100 Consider the fact that I keep asking you for 'facts" to support macro evolution, "any" evidence that shows the transitional evolving of one animal into some completely different animal over any period of time, using the fossil record. Mans gradual step from ape like creature to super human today is not scientific, its science fiction... It makes for good bed time stories... New evidence every day, SHOW ME SOMETHING, "retard" maybe someting from Earnest Haeckel's collection, lol
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Showing a programmed Christian evidence is like showing a blind man porn; nothing happens becuase in both cases, they can't see what they're being shown. We have shown you the fossils, we have shown you the atavisms and vestigial organs, we have shown you the DNA, we have shown you the speciation within fruitflies and misquitoes, we have turned back on the old genes of chickens to reveal their dinosaur traits, (continued)
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 we have made successful predictions based on what we know about evolution to determine what kind of lifeforms we should find and where, and how old those fossils should be. And yet, we have not once since the birth of our species found any evidence to support creation. That's just one of the reasons why Christianity is dying.
@nickmorrison1100 YAWN! blah blah blah - blah blah blah blah (evidence) and that is how evolution happened. Yawn! The evidence for creation, just made this reply, I didn't come from absolutely Nothing out of a bang, I exist as a result of God's creation. The visible world we live in.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Blah blah blah (Creationist child holding ears and stomping feet). The evidence is shown to you, and you ignore it and then say that there is no evidence, and then say that God created you without giving any evidence yourself. No wonder why Christianity is dying...
@nickmorrison1100 How many Christians are there in the world, and other religions that believe in a god as opposed to atheists. I think you need to re-examine who is going to go extinct : ) lol'ss
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Lol. I made no mention of atheists or other religions. Lol. The percentage of Christians in the world is decreasing. That's a fact. Nothing about atheism or other religions even needs to be mentioned. Christianity is dying...and I'm making sure that happens. Eventually, Christianity will only be a memory...a bad memory, but a memory that we will learn from, to make sure we do not make the same horrifying superstitious mistakes we made in the past.
@nickmorrison1100 Your so funny, now you know Christianity is dying,, my sides are splitting, I have not the faintist idea where you are getting your information. I dont think you have either. I'll tell you this, Jesus said that the gospel (listen) "Would" be preached to the "entire" world and we are nearly there. Such a prophetic truth that you cannot deny, I have some more for you. Which you cannot ignore. The only fiction is the lack of evidence you keep barking about, woof woof (evidence)
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Yep, statistic after statistic keeps showing a decrease in persons who believe in the Christian god. I know you don't have any idea where I'm gettin my information from, because you've never been taught to find any information outside from your extremely outdated bible. Your prophetic "truth" is complete bullshit. When you want to present to me some evidence about the existence of your evil god; let me know. I'm still waiting...lol
@nickmorrison1100 you keep using the word evidence, a sample is long over due. prehaps a "missing" link to support your waffle ? or an intermediate fossil of some sort. listen to M behe, darwin so called theory has been bypassed by real science.
@nickmorrison1100 In the Boook of Leviticus 7:24 God forbids the people from eating flesh. So friend you alone have a serious problem in differentiating when the bible is speaking Metaphoricially and when it is speaking factual in the face of biblicial scholars..... tool
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 The interesting thing about Biblical metaphors, is that they're only metaphors when you can't defend them. These days, Christians are even calling God himself a metaphor, because they know he's not real. If you don't like something in the Bible, you just call it a metaphor. Tell me, what is God really saying to his people when he tells them that they will eat their children then? Lol. God is evil...and that's no metaphor. :)
@nickmorrison1100 The only thing not real is the so called "christians" calling God a metaphor,, so funny. And again, God does not command them to eat their young. The famine which overcomes them will cause them to eat their own flesh for not obeying God and receiving his blessings. If you cant understand the text, pick a new one to poke at, or just, shut up about it, your sounding completely stupid at this stage.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 God is not real. This is obvious and has been verified by science. Anyways, so what you're saying is, God will force parents to eat their own children...thank you for confirming.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Everything you mentioned is not evidence. Everyone back then knew, through science, about the rotation and shape of the Earth. The only ones who didn’t were the stupid Jews and Christians, whose Bible actually teaches that the Earth is flat. I wouldn’t call this scientific evidence! Lol.
@nickmorrison1100 "Everyone back then" show me a historical "source for this please. Francis Bacon
Philosopher of science and Sir Isaac Newton, you say are "stupid." Who are you again? These and many more where Christians. And the Bible is the reason why we have scientific study today. Stupid Jews you say, yet they write of the earth being Globe shaped and suspended in space. And you come up with Nothing. Looks like you didn't study the Bible, just listened to what others had to say.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Are you kidding me? The ancient Greeks and the rest of the world knew that the Earth was a sphere through scientific processing. Only a few peoples in the Middle East did not know this. The Jews believed in a FLAT Earth, which their Bible and other writings such as the Book of Enoch clearly demonstrate. To suggest otherwise is to live in denial for the sake of defending your imperfect (and imaginary) god.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Well, the evidence for the Jews believing in a flat earth is in the Bible, along with many other historic documents, and the evidence for the Ancient Greeks knowing that the Earth was a sphere is also found in historic documents. This is what you learn in school. Were you home schooled by fanatical Christians?
@nickmorrison1100 Again, name your historical documents. And the bible does speak of the pillars of the earth and the four corners of the earth, but the average intelligent person whom studies the bible can tell the difference when the bible s speaking factually or metaphorically. And the Bible speaks clearly of the Earth being suspended in space and as a globe shaped planet. Fact.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 “the average intelligent person whom studies the bible can tell the difference when the bible s speaking factually or metaphorically.”
No, the average intelligent person does NOT know this, because the average intelligent person almost always makes the mistake in thinking that what is considered a metaphor today was considered a metaphor back then.
@nickmorrison1100 You yourself making the very same mistake when suggesting that God was commanding His people to "eat" there children. Yes I can see your point. You dont know the bible as well as you thought, I can see this...
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Then you should now know that the Bible teaches a flat earth. "Corners" and "ends" were not metaphors. They are TODAY...now after we've proven the Bible incorrect. And no, I'm not making any mistake concerning metaphors. There is no way that you can convince anyone but fools that the author was writing God's forcing parents to eat their children to be just a "metaphor". Lol. The only mistake I see is a fool believing fairytales. Christianity is a fairytale for grown-ups.
@nickmorrison1100 Read the verses in their context when the Bible talks about a flat earth, A ROUND GLOBE SHAPED EARTH SUSPENDED IN SPACE, and the four corners of the earth. And if you are clever enough, thats a big IF, you will see that these verses indeed speak factual and metaphoricaly when read within their context. You would seriously have to be a clown to miss this. Or worse yet, a fool. At least a clown gets paid.... Dumb is forever....
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 As I said, the writers of the Bible believed that the Earth was flat, and that is obvious from what they wrote in the Bible. It makes sense since at the time and in the area where they lived, that was the popular belief. The Bible is clear that it speaks of a flat earth and as I said, persons constantly make the mistake of thinking that because something is a metaphor now, that it was a metaphor always. That's not the case with the Biblical flat earth.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 When wrong, Christian fools have the pleasure of falling back on these cop-out defenses; that something is either just a metaphor or that we're taking something out of context. You Christians say the Bible is 100% true, until we prove something in it wrong, and you make up the excuse that it was just a metaphor or that it was taken out of context...all to keep your precious but ultimately flawed Bible as the word of God...even though it's the word of shit.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 When someone says “the four corners of the Earth” today, it is obviously a metaphor. But back then within the Near East, when somebody said this, that is what they actually meant. Remember that metaphors almost ALWAYS evolve from concepts which were meant to be taken literally at one time. It’s just like when we talk about our software having “bugs”. This is because a long time ago, there really was a real bug that was causing a computer to experience trouble.
@nickmorrison1100 Today you say it is used as a metaphor and not back then, again, says you, o powerful and great, "fool." How the heck do you know. So the Bible was speaking in a literal sence was it, when it mentions the four corners of the earth, DUH! No your wrong again. They knew clearly that the earth was globe shaped, and were not confused like you. Job 26:10 the earth IS described as if being in motion. Isaiah 40:22 (Not the compass of the horizon due to the detailed explaination....
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Says me and all the historians. Your own Bible proves it. But you're the kind of guy that can take a Dr. Suess book and convince many naive persons that it provides answers to the meaning of life while scientifically explaining the whole process of how molecules behave to turn gas into plasma. So you're going to believe anything you want, despite what the Bible actually says. Someone could sneeze, and you'll make an argument that it explains the hydrological cycle! Lol!
@nickmorrison1100 If you think you are right, then the Hebrews though the earth was both flat and globe shaped at the same time, or are the verses I quoted spoken as metaphors also. No, You door knob.... The earth is clearly described as being suspended in Space, Job 26:7 (Not a Metaphor)
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 I don't think; I know. It's a fact that ancient homosapiens knew the Earth was a sphere except for the Middle East, who believed that the Earth was like a disc or square. The Bible is not the only literature which shows this to be true. No literature from that time and place suggests that the Earth is a sphere. Christians have been desperately trying to connect the Bible to the facts we now know ever since scientists have proven this Christian belief to be incorrect.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 What you would like to do, is simply call something in the Bible a metaphor when it doesn’t quite work out for you, & then talk about all of these amazing scientific "facts" in the Bible when they happen to make sense today. The ironic thing is, many of these so-called scientific "facts" come from these poetic Bible books, & you are taking the very Biblical verses which were actually MEANT by the authors to be metaphorical, & claiming them as scientific truth!
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Isaac Newton was not stupid. He was extremely smart. But back then, referring to his Christian beliefs, when scientific knowledge was still in its infancy, scientists such as him still did not know any better. If he were alive today, not only would he be an atheist, but he'd be on here right now educating Christians on how stupid they are.
@nickmorrison1100 There exists a lenthy list of scientists in every field of scientific study on creationontheweb answersingenesis and many other christian and non christian websites. These men and women have more accumulated knowledge and experience than your minute brain could fathom, and you say they are stupid, because they have reasonable for why they believe what they believe. it is your short comings of the evidence that proves foolish
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Anyone who believes in made-up answers to satisfy questions, instead of what the evidence shows is not a scientist. No mainstream scientists take these persons seriously. Even if you were to consider these persons scientists, 99% of all scientists are atheists and dismiss all religious superstitious bullshit. Answers in Genesis is known for being biased and interpreting scripture to fit their own immoral personalities. No one takes them seriously either. Lol.
@nickmorrison1100 99% lols, this is BS my friend. AGAIN, show me evidence for this 99% of "all" scientists. Besides Majority opinion does not determin truth. You keep using the word evidence like you know something we all dont. Is there any mutation in macro evolution that has produced or added new information to human dna. Poor Dawkins fell flat on his face trying to answer this question. He, like yourself have never observed any mutation that has added a little information to the human genome
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Yes, 99 percent…perhaps more. Real scientists don’t use faith because faith is the complete opposite of science. So as you can see, it really doesn’t make sense for a scientist to be a Christian. You cannot be the color red if you’re already the color green. You cannot be ice if you are liquid water. You simply cannot be a Christian and a scientist. It’s impossible.
@nickmorrison1100 The evidence that a true scientist sees reveals to him that in the first cause there must have been an intelligent designer. You may believe that we came from an explosion, with no answer for where the matter or gases came from for that explosion. Thats real faith in action. However it is easier and more intelligent to believe in a divine creator which does not fly in the face of science.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 The evidence that a true scientist sees reveals to them real truth and not the fantasy that other non-scientists want to believe. Your own logic works against you, for if we all required an intelligent designer, then so did that intelligent designer. Eventually, you're going to have to realize that a god is not necessary. The evidence for the big bang is overwhelming, and there is no evidnece for a god. All the answers will come to us as long as we abandon superstition.
@nickmorrison1100 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God (Gen 1:1) so that the things which are seen (us) were not made of things which are visible (Atoms) Hebrews 11:3.. Energy is indiscernible and so are atoms, molecules and gases to the naked eye, yet combined they become visible. The bible agrees perfectly that the entire creation was made of invisible elements called "Atoms" Colossians 1:16 Romans 1:20-21. Put that in your pipe and smoke it..
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 "Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God (Gen 1:1) so that the things which are seen (us) were not made of things which are visible (Atoms) Hebrews 11:3.. Energy is indiscernible and so are atoms, molecules and gases to the naked eye, yet combined they become visible. The bible agrees perfectly that the entire creation was made of invisible elements called "Atoms""
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What are you smoking?!!!!
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 You seriously just tried to convince me that the Bible teaches about atoms with this pathetic verse?! Seriously? You're even more stupid than I thought. Hey stupid, this just proves even more what I've been saying all along. You can take anything in the Bible and interpret it to say anything you want it to. There is no way in Hell any reasonably intelligent person could be fooled by your bullshit. In no way, shape, or form, does that verse teach anything close about atoms.
@nickmorrison1100 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God (Gen 1:1) so that the things which ((((are seen ))))(us) were not made of things which ((((((are visible))))) (Atoms) It explains somthing that is an actual fact... Coincidence, I think not, inspired by God, I think so..
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 And you know it too. A science teacher can't just tell their class to open the Bible to page such and such and say, "Okay now, what are these verses talking about here?", and one of the students will say "It's talking about atoms." "That's correct." says the teacher. "Anything else?" "Yes." says one of the students. "According to the Bible, there are electrons and protons and gold is an element." "Good job." Yeah right. Give me a break.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Like I said, you could take a shit or blow your nose, and you could convince yourself that the feces or mucus would be teaching you about the origin of the universe. The Bible doesn't teach shit about atoms. The Bible doesn't teach shit about the hydrological cycle. The Bible doesn't teach shit but inaccurate things about science and history, and how to hate everyone.
But again, show me where it teaches about atoms, and then I'll be impressed.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 And no, majority opinion does not determine truth. It’s a good thing that scientists do not base their truths on their opinions, but on scientific evidence. And it’s true, I seem to know what evidence is, and you haven’t a clue. Evidence does not come in the form of a book written thousands of years ago by men who claimed to see gods. Evidence is not the same as faith (desired truth), which is all that Christians use to determine their fairytale beliefs.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Every reproduction results in mutations. And yes, it is these mutations which cause macroevolution. Richard Dawkins has answered this question just fine. You are no doubt referring to a video in which he was asked this question, and it was rudely edited in order to deceive the public into thinking that he couldn’t answer. Deception is what Christianity is all about, as is foolishness, which is why there is no doubt that you would be fooled by such deception.
@nickmorrison1100 The Video is called "from a frog to a prince" where Dawkins is dumb founded. I have the "uncut" version here with me. Some hard done by athiest made his own boggie video because he seen his poor "god" dawkins hard done by... And like the video states, no nutation has ever added NEW information to the genome. Already existing information mutating is called "micro" evolution. We dont see any species becoming something new, do we now : )
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 If someone blew their nose and told you that the mucus was the incarnation of Jesus, you would believe it, so it doesn't surprise me that you would allow yourself to be fooled by deceptive videos. As I said, the video you watched and foolishly believed was just another deceptive trick by Creationists to try and make evolutionists look like they're incorrect about evolutionary fact. As I said, Dawkins was never stumped and has answered this question just fine in the past.
@nickmorrison1100 If someone blew their nose you would probably say, O look everyone, the first stages of life have begun, from poo to you,,,, LoL's which is what most evolutionists believe (by faith) can you show me some evidence for the first stages of "evolved" life (lol's) keep on dreaming of finding them "missing" links, duh! and double duh!!! tey and make them look like they are incorrect, you do a pretty good job of that Alone....
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Actually, evolutionists don't believe that. Mucus and poo do not meet the requirements for producing life. You might be able to make yourself believe that they can reveal miracles to you, but that would just be your delusion talking. And we don't need faith to believe in evolution, we have the evidence which shows that it's factual. But I know you'd rather believe that a man with a white beard on a cloud made everyone through magic. Makes perfect sense.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 You are another example of Creationists embarrassing themselves by believing in false information, kind of like how you believe in false gods. Type in "richard dawkins stumped by creationists' question", and you will find the video where Mr. Dawkins explains these deceptive practices. By the way, I watched that video you mentioned, and it's complete bullshit. Since this video obviously deceives its audience, how can any information in there be trusted? Creationism=fairytale.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 So anyway, now that I've shown you to be wrong yet again, I'll address your other issues. Yes, mutations DO add new information to the genome. We already know this. As for microevolution vs macroevolution, like all Creationists, you don't understand the process of evolution. You believe that evolutionists claim that a lizard can just give birth to a chicken, and it doesn't work that way. That's not how evolution works. This is what your programming has caused you to believe.
@nickmorrison1100 Again, show me the fossils for the intermediate changes within any species..... such waffle seems to spew out of your mouth. it smells worse than what probably comes out your other end.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Lol. Everyone you see is a transitional form you idiot. Do you know anything about homo-erectus or neanderthals? Have you ever seen a chimpanzee? A monkey? Gorilla? Doh! What about elephants, mammoths, mastadons? Doh! Why do you think that dolphins are sometimes born with legs, or why humans are still born with more than two nipples? Doh! I won't overload you with scientific terms because I know you're too stupid to handle it, but the evidence for evolution is overwhelming.
@nickmorrison1100 The "ape-men" claims often based on fragments remains which are more open to interpretatation,but when more bones are found,the specimens are found to be either man or non-man, (eg, australopithecine) neither transitional nor "mosaic". E.g. analysis of a number of characteristics shows that H. ergaster, H. erectus, H. heidelbergensis, & H. neanderthalensis were most likely racial variants of modern man, while H. rudolfensis and H. habilis were just types of australopithecines.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 I don't know where you copied this text from, but I doubt you even understand what it means. Anyways, all of these fossils clearly show humans all have a common ancestor and show a transition from more primitive primates to more modern ones. Seriously, please look at a monkey.
@nickmorrison1100 Ape men huh: )You should keep the word yourself. Not one of your replies surrenders any "evidence" of Macro Evolution. Many evolutionists support whale evolution by alleging that there are vestigial hind legs buried in their flesh.However these so-called "remnants" are not useless at all, but help strengthen the reproductive organs the bones are different in males and females,so they are best explained by creation, not evolution. Listen to Mike Riddle on human "evolution"
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Again, I don't know where you copied this text from, but everything you copied here is complete bullshit. Vestigial organs are left over from a lifeform's primitive previous life forms. Whether or not they provide SOME usefulness, or none, it is obviously a sign of evolution. An intelligent creator would NOT create an animal with a vestigial organ. Your kind is simply trying to think of any excuse to desperately keep your fairytale alive.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 And while the evidence for evolution is overwhelming, you don't have any evidence for creation. Not one bit of evidence. You'd think that if your evil god was so powerful, that he'd be able to make himself a bit more known to the world, but he's weak...actually, he's not real.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 ALL evolution, including the process of reptiles evolving to mammals, involves microevolution. Macroevolution is only the result of many microevolutionary processes adding up over time and through many generations. And yes, we DO see species becoming something new, but you're too close-minded to listen to true science. You are too comfortable in your world of fairytales to see reality anymore. What a sad world you live in...unable to distinguish reality from fantasy... :(
@nickmorrison1100 Name your transitional species so, I yet to see one. And micro evolution is not "evolution" at all duh! And it is certianly not "little" examples of Macro evolution. Such is the fairy tale world you live in with yrt again, no evidence for a mutation producing new information.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Microevolution IS evolution. That is the only way that evolution happens and is the only way that macroevolution happens. Macroevolution is the result of many changes of many generations through many years.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 It's like paints. You seem to think that evolution teaches that red can just turn into orange, but that's NOT what evolution teaches. Instead, it teaches that if you add a tiny drop of yellow one year, it DOES turn slightly orange, but the effects are too small to see. Yet if you keep adding this same amount every year, eventually, perhaps after a thousand years, it will start to look orange. That is how microevolution produces macroevolution. That is evolution bitch.
@nickmorrison1100 So small they dont even happen, because you have yet to give a soild example of an observation for 1. intermediate fossil, 2. observable mutation adding new information which leads to that "red to orange" Your head is fuzzy friend, very fuzzy. The evidence for creation is overwhelming. micro evolution does not produce Macro evolution, such waffle. You have slight changes within a kind, not a magical leap from one kind to another, which is your dream like state
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Incorrect. So small you don't see them, but they're there, and become evident over an immense length of time. And that is how microevolution produces macroevolution. Macroevolution does not exist without many instances of microevolution. This magical leap from one "kind" to another is nowhere to be found in evolution, because it never happens. Lifeforms evolve through many small evolutionary changes over a long period of time to produce significant different lifeforms.
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Observed intermediate fossils? There are thousands +, so I obviously can't list them all here. One of the most famous examples is Archaeopteryx, which has the feathers and skeletal structure of birds and also features of dinosaurs. There are MANY examples of feathered dinosaurs, such as velociraptors. Everyone knows birds evolved from dinosaurs. You want more observation? Scientists have been able to turn back on genes in chickens to revert them back to having dino traits.
@nickmorrison1100 Archaeopteryx, Yes a bird that lived 150 million years ago lol's like the elephant bird: ) However Alan Feduccia a world authority on birds at the University of North Carolina at chapel Hill an evolutionist Himself, disagrees with this, he states, Its a bird, a perching bird and no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that. The cover of time magazine even illustrated it with feathers, although not the slightest trace of feathers had been found. Such fiction, tut tut...
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Yes, Archaeopteryx is a bird that lived 150 million years ago, and is the perfect transitional fossil between dinosaurs and birds. Everything that you copied just now from some website in no way refutes this fact. Not the slightest trace of feathers were found? Lol. More proof that you talk out of your asshole. Feathers were among the most obvious features of this transitional form. It is a known fact that it had feathers. You have no appreciation for education do you...
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Snakes, with their feet and similar DNA to lizards are a clear transitional lifeform. We have observed genetic mutations in fruit flies, witnessed the change of species in mosquitoes, we have seen how humans are still born with more than two nipples, dolphins with legs, etc. The evidence goes on and on, and continues to grow every day.
May 14 1948, the Jews proclaimed the independence of the reborn state of Israel. Ish 66:8 a nation born in a day, Jesus said His coming would be soon after this event which he also foretold and is fulfilled in YOUR seeing. study Matt 24:32. Today Israel is one of the most agriculturally efficient lands on earth fulfilling Isaiah's prophecy in Ish 27:6, 35:7. A once desolate land now filling the earth with large exports of fruit, plants etc, in these Last Days as foretold
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
Did God scatter His people,Jews,around the whole planet because of thier disobedience?Yes,fulfilled,check any encyclopedia.And check Levit 26:33, Deut 28:37, 63,64,65. Jer 29:18, Luke 21:24.Did God, during these Last Days, regather His people back into their homeland after nearly 2k years of exile,Yes,He Has, but in unbelief until the full measure of Gentiles are drawn into Gods kingdom.Genesis 13:15,Isaiah 43:5-6,Jeremiah 31:7-8,Ezekiel 36:24, Amos 9:15, Zephaniah 3:20,Matt 24:32. May 14 1948
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
Dr. Harold Urey, a Nobel Prize winner for his research in chemistry, wrote about the impossibility of evolution, but still admitted he believed in the theory! He then added the words, "we believe as an article of faith that life evolved from dead matter on this planet. It is just that its complexity is so great, it is hard for us to imagine that it did." His admission proved that his acceptance of evolution was not based on logic or evidence, but on blind faith.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
Some fool once said that the spread of Christianity would slow down or stop, without giving any evidence for this stupid claim. However in China ALONE ten thousand new Christian believers come to faith in Christ every day. One just has to type in, the gospel spreading in China, to see for themselves. However, type in a country, any country that has not yet heard the gospel and it will be hard to do so. Jesus said his words would be preached to the ENTIRE world, yes, fulfilled in our seeing.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
The Treasury of the snow: Not until the microscope did man discover that each snowflake is like a unique symmetrical treasure. Just like a fingerprint, no two are alike. To the Creator God this was no surprise when He asked Job in chapter 38 verse 22, Have you (entered into) the treasures of the snow? Not until our modern day was this amazing fact brought to light... And cannot be refuted..
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
A reader's digest article in Nov 1982 described a fascinating discovery by the researchers at NASA's Ames Research Center that confirmed the Bible's account that every single element found in the human body exists within the soil. The scientists concluded, "We are just beginning to learn. The biblical scenario for the creation of life turns out to be not far off the mark." Genesis 2:7, 3:19 Job 10:9 Carbon 18% Hydrogen 10% Nitrogen 3.3% Calcium 1.5% Phosphorous 1.2% Potassium 0.2% & Sulphur 0.2%
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Ohhhh, the @rhyce21 you've been bashing about their religion on several YouTube vids! You're too fucking stupid to assume. You aint as good as a hacker as I am that's for sure. Know what Phil, just coz I'm bored out of my mind, let me tell you one thing...you're being watched. Nyahahahahahahahahahaha!!! Well, my time's up. I'll be logged in soon...till next time Phil Keenan aka nickmorrison1100, mackboomer and sonic shit.
Dignified07 9 months ago
Than i suppose you have yet to encounter an authentic Christ-like being, that sticks with an imperfect being through the trials of life to overcome them victoriously & leave them so impacted, they die to their own will & live for His divine perfect will. <3
PropertyOfHoliness 11 months ago
John 3:7 You Must Be Born Again originalwriting.ie Use this book to share the gospel to unbelievers. Contains prophecy related topics concerning Israel and Christ. This book also speaks about spirit mediums, the false teaching of purgatory and discusses scientific facts discovered in the bible long before modern science. This book, God willing, will help you win souls.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 1 year ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Everything you said is bullshit. There is no God and science has been verifying this for centuries now. Get out of fairyland and into the real world. Thanks.
nickmorrison1100 1 year ago
@nickmorrison1100 You are such a funny "little" man. Even Richard Dawkins has given in to the fact that the existence of God is a possibility. Who are you anyway little man? lols..... Thanks. For nothing "kind fellow."
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Who said that they didn't believe that the existence of God is a possibility? Not me. There is a chance...though it's extremely small. Science has shown that he doesn't exist, but there's still an EXTREMELY small chance. There is no evidence for God and science continually proves the Bible incorrect. None of us have "given into the fact" that he is possible, because we are rational persons and know that nobody can know anything 100%.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Extreamly "small", says "you," again. How big is the Universe anyway. What is small, is you and I and science has not shown that the existence of God is not possible by any measure of your imagination! The Bible is full of scientific knowledge in a non scientific language, if you read it through you would discover some amazing facts. Which modern day science has supposedly discoverd in recent years.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Only a brainwashed individual would foolishly believe that the Bible is "full of scientific kowledge". That is perhaps one of the biggest falsehoods that can ever be stated by any person. Science has shown that God does not exist, with no evidence that he does. Again, I never said that science shows it's not possible, but science has so far shown that God does not exist. If you want us to believe otherwise, please submit some evidence.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Miracle healings?
PropertyOfHoliness 11 months ago
@PropertyOfHoliness Miracle healings are bullshit. Except for the munchkin fairies that live in my backyard. I once accidentally broke my wrist while masturbating, and all they did was sprinkle some fairy dust on it and they patched that baby up. What, you don't believe me? My wrist is proof, but I don't have to give you evidence, you just have to have faith.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Well, from what i've witnessed in prayers for people to get healed right on the spot, i'm convinced you haven't experienced a real miracle healing bro.
PropertyOfHoliness 11 months ago
@PropertyOfHoliness Oh that's not true! There was once this woman who had three breasts, and she prayed to our wonderful Monkey God to remove one of the breasts, and after praying, it completely disappeared. In fact, our Monkey God is so loving, that he placed that breast on another woman who lost one of hers due to cancer. And I have proof of this. 500 persons witnessed this happen. There is no way to dispute this bro.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Only a brainwashed fool? Have you eximined the Bible for yourself, or are you speaking from ignorance as is clear here. So you say that Science has shown that God does not exist, because there is no evidence. What evidence have you that he doesn't exist? Only a fool would say that science has so far proved that God does not exist. Evidence No.1 The Earth is suspended in space, Bible verse, Job 26:7 plus 22:14, 26:10, 38:14, the rotation of the Earth also and its globe shape.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Yes, only a brainwashed fool would believe this shit. I did indeed examine the Bible for myself and that is how I know that the Bible is inaccurate and immoral, and that God is evil. I don’t need evidence to believe that God doesn’t exist. If I told you I believed in the Monkey God, would you require yourself to have evidence in order to not believe in him? Of course you wouldn’t. That would be silly. It’s also silly to believe in God with no evidence, and there is none.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 What do you find inaccurate and immoral about the Bible and God's judgement which constantly hangs above sinners who rebel in the face of evidence? Show Me please. If all your thoughts were put up on a large screen for all to see, we would soon see what is really immoral in your heart, compared to God's righteous judgement against sin in the bible. Dont kid yourself, you with your dark heart and sinful thoughts, trying to be God's judge. The bible is my evidence, No 2 is next
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 My Monkey God will judge your puny Christian God, and your god will be thrown in Monkey Hell where he will be raped by elephants for an eternity. On a related note, the Bible teaches a young Earth, that animals didn't evolve, that the Earth is flat, that there are deities, it teaches magic, and etc, etc. It's bullshit. All these things we know are incorrect.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 And yes, God is evil. His Bible commands his followers to harm, torture, and kill the innocent. He is unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful, and unjust. His lust for blood and pain is unmatched by any other. Every person who has ever lived is more moral than him. If we were to compare all of the bad and good things that God has done with everything that humans have done, God would lose, and lose bad. As immoral as you probably are, even you are better than this jerk.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Matthew Maury,an officer who served in the U S Navy is considered the father of oceanography and hydrography. Reading his bible he noticed Psalms 8:8 “paths of the seas.” Because of Maury’s belief in the scriptures his research led him to discover the ocean’s paths of warm and cold continental currents.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Lol. I love how you Christians can learn to interpret anything written to mean whatever you want. This is how you are able to read passages in the Bible like where God would force parents to eat their own children, and you still call this guy loving. I suppose if there was a verse in the Bible that talked about bad smells in the air, you'd claim that the Bible contained scientific knowledge of farts!
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Whatever I want? lol's Evidence No 3. The Ocean Springs at the Bottom of the Deep Proverbs 8:28. The Mountains at the Bottom of the Deep Jonah 2:6. Only in recent years has man discovered the mountains at the bottom of the deep such as the Mariana's trench etc.. so were does God force parents to eat their young? what passages are these you dont quote?
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Lol. Mountains under the ocean is DIVINELY inspired science? Are you kidding me? Anyone living on a mountainous island knew there were mountains under the sea. And since modern humans have been around for a few hundred thousand years, that kind of knowledge isn't that impressive to have just a few thousand years ago. Show me in the Bible where it talks about atomic particles, & then I'll be impressed. Lol.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 And How would they observe these mountains at the "bottom" of the deep, Sheol the pit, which is where these mountains were described as being located. Give me a break.... Tell me, prehistoric man built megalithic monuments, made beautiful vave paintings and kept records of lunar phases. Why would he wait a thousand centuries before using the same skills to record history? The Biblical time scale is much more likely.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 What are you talking about? Anyone who has seen a mountain popping out of the ocean (islands anyone) would surely have a brain intelligent enough to tell them that there must be mountains under the water. Lol. Sheol the Pit? What does a hypothetical state of mind for the dead have to do with proving that there are mountains in the ocean? You are really stretching the already pathetic attempts at reality that the Bible offers. Say something intelligent please.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nickmorrison1100 There you go, just like a typical evolutionist. (Anyone who has seen a mountain popping out of the ocean (islands anyone) would surely have a brain intelligent enough to tell them that there ((must))(lol's) be mountains under the water) Says who,YOU LoL's.This might not be so. One would not state a fact unless one has seen the evidence, unless your a complete mug. Mountains coming out of the water, would be any land mass, and does not describe to us vast underwater ranges.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 All this stuff is being written down from the imaginations of the authors. The things they write are very non-specific, yet when someone discovers something in the world that even only somewhat relates to a passage in the Bible, you jump up with excitement and believe without thinking, that the Bible told of a scientific breakthrough, when in reality, it was nothing of the sort. Your emotional need for God to be real is making you believe things without reason. Wake up!
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 like I said the bible's main purpose is not to give scientific information, however when the bible does touch upon matters relating to science they are stunningly accurate.. Yes always accurate. You have yet to refute any of the evidence brought forth. The Earth suspended in space, being globe shaped etc.. And still waiting for your greek historical references relating to the earth suspended in space, the Hydrological Cycle etc..
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 You're correct. The Bible's main purpose is to deceive. And no, the Bible is extremely inaccurate. Teaching that the Earth is flat is not an "accurate" thing to teach. Teaching that there is a paradise where you'll go after you die if you believe in a god is also not accurate. It's a book of fantasy...and it's a wonderful fantasy, it's just not the truth.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 I also find it amazing that you want me to provide evidence for you, when not only do I do that, but you have yet to provide any evidence yourself. You have not been able to refute anything I said, and when you are confronted with the evidence, you ignore it. The Bible is the best evidence for every argument I make, and to refute every one you make as well.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 If you want to know how the Bible teaches a flat earth, read it! If you want to know how unscientific the Bible is, read it! If you want to know how evil God is, or if you want to know why Christians are so delusional, read the Bible! But most Christians don't read the Bible. Either that, or they have already been programmed to justify immorality and inaccuracy when they do. But it's like I always say, you can lead a Christian to evidence, but you can't make him think.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 "the Hydrological Cycle"
Lol
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Yes, prehistoric man did build monuments and made beautiful paintings, but your numbers are WAY off. No one waited a "thousand centuries" to record history. Where did you get that? Using these skills for survival were more important than recording history, especially when they didn't have much history to even write about yet.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nickmorrison1100 You say, Using these skills for survival were more important than recording history, especially when they didn't have much history to even write about yet. Says Who, YOU again. How do you know at what age history became important enough to write about. I would believe all history would be important to those living at that time. Yet 6k years of "written" History best suits the biblicial time frame.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 At that time, persons didn't even have a language to use you idiot. That kind of technology didn't exist yet and it took several thousand years just to invent a very primitive one...and the language that they first created could not adequately record the history you think they could. And even if they could, it's not like they could just go down to OfficeMax and pick up some pens and paper. These guys were too busy looking for food and shelter, and running from bears.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison110 Again, HOW DO YOU KNOW, they didnt have a language. What waffle are you reading? Do you know how many languages are in ther world today? Tell me, at what time was each one created and how did they come about. Again, How do you know if they were to "busy" to write anything down, such waffle doesnt even comply with the laws of logic. 6 - 10 k years fits perfectly with recorded history and the birth of lauguages fits with Babel as recorded in the Bible
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Our knowledge comes from what the evidence tells us. We know that humans have been around for millions of years, yet we only have a written history of about 6,000 years. So obviously, the evidence shows us that they didn't have a language until around that recently. Like evolution, a complex technology would obviously take many years to develop.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Again, how many years would it take for six thousand languages to "spring forth." Your idea of evolution is based in myth. Every missing transitional link from ape "like" creature to man doesnt exist. Only in the brains of the deceived. If pressed about mans ancestry, I would hav to say that all we have is a hugh question mark, nothing truthful in transitional specie to man. Richard Leakey, world's formost Paleoanthropologist... Complex technology, lol's
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Again, it took millions of years for humans to develop a language, and a few hundred thousand years for homosapiens to develop a language. Every missing transitional link from ape "like" creature to man doesn't exist, because every time we find one, it creates two more. Lol. What you have to do is look at the beautiful transitional web of fossils that we already have, which more than verifiies transition. You are believing lies from Christian programmers.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Being busy has nothing to do with logic, but rationality. Early humans did not have the knowledge or technology to develop a complex language adequate enough to write down history, and this is what you're choosing to ignore. And again, of course 6-10 k years fits the Bible, because that is around the time when the Bible was starting to be written, just like the rest of written history. You're only proving my point when you say that.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Plus, history and other religious texts were written BEFORE any Jewish texts. If your Biblical view fits so perfectly, you'd think that the earliest writings would consist of God and stuff, and yet they are of other religions.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 You're way of thinking says that humans just popped into existence out of nothing and already knew how to speak and write. We know that this didn't happen because humans have been around for millions of years and there has only been written records going back a few thousand years, which means it took them millions of years to develop the technology to record history, which makes sense because humans aren't born with a language.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Humans have been around for millions of years now : ) your starting to make so much sence. Millions of years and then all of a sudden, Thousands of complex languages, with written records going back no more than 6k years ago.. This speaks of a biblicial time frame, not millions of years. All paleontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms [link from one anmal type to another] Stephen J Gould... Why cant you except truth
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 It wasn't all of a sudden. A millions years didn't go by and then all of a sudden persons started to write. Simple words began to develop among human peoples which helped them to cooperate to survive, such as when hunting and gathering, planting, and building structures. Such languages were forming from several different parts of the world as different peoples were spreading out from Africa. They started out as only simple words, nothing complex.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 As many thousand years passed, the languages became more complex and they began to form languages in written form. But such primitive languages were insufficient to record such long periods of history and there was insufficient technology to do it. This all added to the reasons why it took so long before writing started to become somewhat common.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Of course this fits the Biblical time frame, because Jewish texts were among the first early accounts to be written down...along with Hindu scriptures, which even predate the Jewish ones. There are texts which are even older, and cave writings which are even older than that. So in a sense, the earliest of writings even clearly show that humans existed way before Judasim was even invented, so it's not exactly a perfect fit like you want to believe.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 This is all common sense stuff to normal persons who don't fall into the hands of psychological programming predators. You are under the programming of Christian predators who have turned you into a robot, and you will act and sound like a retard for the rest of your life. I feel sorry for you, because even though you're stupid, you're really a victim. This is why Christianity has to die, and I'm so happy that it is. Embrace atheism.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Says who, you again, you are so funny..... They didnt have this nor that, how the crap do you know what they had "20" or so thousand years ago. Can you pin pint the beginning of any language? out of the thousands which exist today. How do you know they couldnt record history at any time in the past. Smell the BS from here. Your guessing game holds no weight. Watch the evidence for the ORIGINAL tower of BABEL watch?v=tuDnVcDnFJY
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 All scientists know this because that is what the evidence tells them. You on the other hand wish to believe only what you want to believe, so persons like you make videos about fairytales such as the Tower of Babel, which is a cute story for children, but are made only to deceive, and it works on weak minds such as yours. The idea that humans just popped out of nowhere with ready to speak languages is good for fiction, but bad for persons who wish to live in reality.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Recording history wasn't exactly a priority back then, but I guess according to you, human beings were more likely to sit by the campfire and write down how their day went before they had something to eat. Get real. And please open a science book.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 And again, you were there at the camp fire tellin fairy tales of "macro evolution." : ) Continuous transitional sequences [showing the evolution of a form without any missing links] are not merely rare, but are virtually absent. so says, George Gaylord Simpson, professor of zoology ay Columbia University and curator of the department of Geology and Paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History... But you, in wilful ignorance know better, NOT.....
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 In a way, we were at the campfire, because we have gone into the past by looking at what the evidence tells us, not the fairytales that fictional books say. Continuous transitional sequences are prevalent in the fossil record, but Christians choose to ignore this evidence, just like what you continue to do. You have no evidence for creation, and you ignore the evidence for evolution. But you have to in order to convince yourself of nonsense.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 You can only start recording history when you have the tools, the time, and the motive to do it! It took many thousand years for homo-sapiens to develop the technology and such. And if you weren't such an idiot, you would understand that of course 6,000 years of recorded history fits the Bible, because that's when the Biblical accounts were starting to be recorded! Duh! And you know what, so were other ancient religions like Hinduism. Please...open that science book.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Further more, the same skills used for building monuments and making paintings were not the same skills needed for recording history. To do so, you need a language, and language is an extremely sophisticated technology. It is no wonder why it took so long for humans to develop this skill, and it is more because of this reason, the length of time which it took to develop a language, that it took so long for them to record their history.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Remember that it took thousands of years just for humanity to develop homo-sapiens, and so too was language a slowly developing skill. Think about it. First of all, a language needed to be invented, and it needed to be understood by an entire people. They didn’t have the technology to properly record and teach such languages the way we do today. And even then, spoken language needed to be converted into written language.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Again, quoting without evidence for your developing into homo-sapiens. You havent seen the videos then by Mick Riddle /watch?v=dFsA40euG6E let him wreck your micro "evolved" brain which you cannot trust to determin truth...
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 So you need evidence to prove that language isn't something that a human just knows when they are born? Lol. You ask for evidence for the most obvious things, and yet you accept everything you do believe, including the most ridiculous of things, on faith, without evidence. And you've already sent me to a bogus video which purposely lied about Richard Dawkin's interview, so how can I trust you to send me to another video?
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 I never sent you the original video, I offered you a copy of the original video, which is still up for grabs. Again, for the wilful ignorant, its called, from a Frog to a Prince. Scientists who study the origin of languages, called philologists, hav concluded that it is probable that the thousands of dialects and languages throughout the planet can be traced back to an original language in mans ancient past. Pro Alfredo Tombetti claims that he can prove the common origin of all
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 I already saw that video, and it intentionally deceives the viewers by editing footage to make it look like Richard Dawkins was stumped by a question, when in fact he was not. This is what Christians do. They deceive. The entire Chrsitian religion is one giant deception. And you being fooled by this video proves it.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 If dawkins wasnt stumped, prehaps you can answer the question which left him DUMB founded. Can you give an example of that positive ("randon" "accidental" macro mutation) Which you believe is "meaningful", rm a meaningless randon act, that or which adds new information to the genome...
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Dawkins wasn't stumped. You and the rest of your easily fooled Christian kind have been tricked into believing that he was aksed this question and then couldn't answer it. That was the result of cut and paste editing to deceive everyone, and to try and make evolution look bad. That is what you Creationists have to resort to in order to defend your fairytale. Richard Dawkins has already answered this question.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 "Scientists who study the origin of languages, called philologists, hav concluded that it is probable that the thousands of dialects and languages throughout the planet can be traced back to an original language in mans ancient past."
If that was true, it would only compliment the theory of evolution, and does nothing to support your creation idea.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 languages. Max Mueller, one one of the greatest oriental language scholars, declared that all human languages can be traced back to one single original language. Pro Otto Jesperson stated that the first language was given to man by God. (Joseph Free, Archeology and Bible History.. Men more intelligent than you my friend on languages see the connection from Genesis, 6k years ago for the birth of all languages. So pick on them and be put in your place.Babel, tongue tower Genesis
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 And yet there are many more intelligent men than this guy as well as you, that say the idea of God giving man a language is complete bullshit. There is no evidence for that. It makes sense for all languages to have some relation to one parent language, because when humans were evolving, they all came from one ancestor from one place. Your attempt to prove Biblical bullshit is only helping to prove evolution. Good job sir.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 One ancestor which your missing links for. You on a turn table spewing out the same waffle on every reply. You know nothing about the origin of languages yet go on like an expert, so funny...
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 And yet you want me to believe someone who believes that the world popped into existence by magic...LOL
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 In other words, since you already sent me to a video full of lies, how can I trust any video you show me? Any video you want me to watch will probably just be full of lies like the first one. By sending me to the first deceitful video, you don't have the credibility for me to trust you to watch another one.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 The first written languages consisted of ideogram pictographs, only about a thousand, very inefficient for telling long epics like you seem to think they should have been capable of. Heck, I’m actually surprised they were able to pull it off as early as they did. The Biblical time scale is more likely? Bull shit. Yeah, I’m sure it’s much more plausible that humans were just born with the ability to speak and write like the Bible suggests. Again…bullshit.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1
"And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat." - Leviticus 26:29
"And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters." - Deuteronomy 28:53
"And I will cause them to eat the flesh of their sons and the flesh of their daughters, and they shall eat every one the flesh of his friend." - Jeremiah 19:9
Face it. Your god is one evil and sadistic son of a bitch. If anyone deserves Hell, it's HIM.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 If you read these verses within there context you would see that, God will judge His people in reguard to their sin, if they obey God He will Bless them, if the turn from God (to idols and witchcraft etc) He will take away their blessing so that disease, terror, invasion and captivity will consue them. During famine, they will have to resort to cannibalism. God does not make them eat their young. There wickedness which was always far worse than Gods judgement is clear.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Nice attempt to once again find a clever way of twisting scripture to mean what you want it to, but all you did was prove to me and everyone else that what I said is correct. God is evil enough to force parents to eat their very own children. Thank you for clarifying that. And yes, forcing parents to eat their own children is EVIL. God is evil. What sick fuck would force parents to eat their own children?! Only a sick evil god, that's who...
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 I dont have to twist them, the thousands of biblical scolars who are more learned than you have already agreed to what these verse say and mean. I dont need to hear your super imposed point of false view. When I read these verses within their context they are self explanatory, I know my bible... Again, look at your own thoughs in a "mirror" AND WE WILL SOON SEE what evil is and were it comes form....
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 These "scolars" are more "learned"? Lol. Your so-called "scholars" are nothing more than theological bullshitters who have brainwashed your weak brain...a brain belonging to someone who can't spell or use proper grammar, & still believes in fairytales & magic. Not to mention, you're easily fooled by videos that lie to their viewers. Face it, you're a victim of these persons, but you're too stupid to admit it to yourself, let alone a smarter person like me. True evil is God.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 it is your weak brain which thinks we arrived here by fairy scum of millions of years without evidence. Applying darwin's test to the ultra-complex world of molecular machinery and cellular systems that have been discovered over the past 40 years, we can say that darwin's theory" has 'absolutely broken down'. Michael Behe biochemist, Darwins black box. Now go catch some fairy dust "evidence" to the contrary dear friend. and put the experts including some of your friends 2 shame
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Evolutionists believe they arrived from "fairy scum"? Lol. You're not playing with a full deck, are you...? Lol. Darwin's test? Lol. Scientific experiments have only strengthened Darwin's theory of evolution, which is why it is considered a fact in today's world. Darwin said at the time of forming his theory that while he couldn't prove everything at the time, the future would provide the necessary evidence, & that's exactly what happened. Darwin was right. Evolution's real.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 you keep using the word evidence, a sample is long over due. prehaps a "missing" link to support your waffle ? or an intermediate fossil of some sort. listen to M behe, darwin is finished
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Considering the fact that you were fooled by the videos which cut and past Dawkins footage to make it look like he was stumped by a question, I have no doubt that you would be fooled by Creationists who make up claims that tests are proving evolution to be incorrect. The fact is, everyday we find new evidence to support evolution, which is already considered a fact in the scientific and normal community. Everyone else who ignores the evidence is either a nut or a retard.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Consider the fact that I keep asking you for 'facts" to support macro evolution, "any" evidence that shows the transitional evolving of one animal into some completely different animal over any period of time, using the fossil record. Mans gradual step from ape like creature to super human today is not scientific, its science fiction... It makes for good bed time stories... New evidence every day, SHOW ME SOMETHING, "retard" maybe someting from Earnest Haeckel's collection, lol
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Showing a programmed Christian evidence is like showing a blind man porn; nothing happens becuase in both cases, they can't see what they're being shown. We have shown you the fossils, we have shown you the atavisms and vestigial organs, we have shown you the DNA, we have shown you the speciation within fruitflies and misquitoes, we have turned back on the old genes of chickens to reveal their dinosaur traits, (continued)
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 we have made successful predictions based on what we know about evolution to determine what kind of lifeforms we should find and where, and how old those fossils should be. And yet, we have not once since the birth of our species found any evidence to support creation. That's just one of the reasons why Christianity is dying.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 YAWN! blah blah blah - blah blah blah blah (evidence) and that is how evolution happened. Yawn! The evidence for creation, just made this reply, I didn't come from absolutely Nothing out of a bang, I exist as a result of God's creation. The visible world we live in.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Blah blah blah (Creationist child holding ears and stomping feet). The evidence is shown to you, and you ignore it and then say that there is no evidence, and then say that God created you without giving any evidence yourself. No wonder why Christianity is dying...
Lol!
nickmorrison1100 9 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 "Darwin is finished". Lol. No, you must be confused with Christianity...which is on its way to extinction! Lol.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 How many Christians are there in the world, and other religions that believe in a god as opposed to atheists. I think you need to re-examine who is going to go extinct : ) lol'ss
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Lol. I made no mention of atheists or other religions. Lol. The percentage of Christians in the world is decreasing. That's a fact. Nothing about atheism or other religions even needs to be mentioned. Christianity is dying...and I'm making sure that happens. Eventually, Christianity will only be a memory...a bad memory, but a memory that we will learn from, to make sure we do not make the same horrifying superstitious mistakes we made in the past.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Your so funny, now you know Christianity is dying,, my sides are splitting, I have not the faintist idea where you are getting your information. I dont think you have either. I'll tell you this, Jesus said that the gospel (listen) "Would" be preached to the "entire" world and we are nearly there. Such a prophetic truth that you cannot deny, I have some more for you. Which you cannot ignore. The only fiction is the lack of evidence you keep barking about, woof woof (evidence)
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Yep, statistic after statistic keeps showing a decrease in persons who believe in the Christian god. I know you don't have any idea where I'm gettin my information from, because you've never been taught to find any information outside from your extremely outdated bible. Your prophetic "truth" is complete bullshit. When you want to present to me some evidence about the existence of your evil god; let me know. I'm still waiting...lol
nickmorrison1100 9 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 you keep using the word evidence, a sample is long over due. prehaps a "missing" link to support your waffle ? or an intermediate fossil of some sort. listen to M behe, darwin so called theory has been bypassed by real science.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 In the Boook of Leviticus 7:24 God forbids the people from eating flesh. So friend you alone have a serious problem in differentiating when the bible is speaking Metaphoricially and when it is speaking factual in the face of biblicial scholars..... tool
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 The interesting thing about Biblical metaphors, is that they're only metaphors when you can't defend them. These days, Christians are even calling God himself a metaphor, because they know he's not real. If you don't like something in the Bible, you just call it a metaphor. Tell me, what is God really saying to his people when he tells them that they will eat their children then? Lol. God is evil...and that's no metaphor. :)
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 The only thing not real is the so called "christians" calling God a metaphor,, so funny. And again, God does not command them to eat their young. The famine which overcomes them will cause them to eat their own flesh for not obeying God and receiving his blessings. If you cant understand the text, pick a new one to poke at, or just, shut up about it, your sounding completely stupid at this stage.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 God is not real. This is obvious and has been verified by science. Anyways, so what you're saying is, God will force parents to eat their own children...thank you for confirming.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Everything you mentioned is not evidence. Everyone back then knew, through science, about the rotation and shape of the Earth. The only ones who didn’t were the stupid Jews and Christians, whose Bible actually teaches that the Earth is flat. I wouldn’t call this scientific evidence! Lol.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 "Everyone back then" show me a historical "source for this please. Francis Bacon
Philosopher of science and Sir Isaac Newton, you say are "stupid." Who are you again? These and many more where Christians. And the Bible is the reason why we have scientific study today. Stupid Jews you say, yet they write of the earth being Globe shaped and suspended in space. And you come up with Nothing. Looks like you didn't study the Bible, just listened to what others had to say.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Are you kidding me? The ancient Greeks and the rest of the world knew that the Earth was a sphere through scientific processing. Only a few peoples in the Middle East did not know this. The Jews believed in a FLAT Earth, which their Bible and other writings such as the Book of Enoch clearly demonstrate. To suggest otherwise is to live in denial for the sake of defending your imperfect (and imaginary) god.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 and your evidence for this is what?
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Well, the evidence for the Jews believing in a flat earth is in the Bible, along with many other historic documents, and the evidence for the Ancient Greeks knowing that the Earth was a sphere is also found in historic documents. This is what you learn in school. Were you home schooled by fanatical Christians?
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Again, name your historical documents. And the bible does speak of the pillars of the earth and the four corners of the earth, but the average intelligent person whom studies the bible can tell the difference when the bible s speaking factually or metaphorically. And the Bible speaks clearly of the Earth being suspended in space and as a globe shaped planet. Fact.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 “the average intelligent person whom studies the bible can tell the difference when the bible s speaking factually or metaphorically.”
No, the average intelligent person does NOT know this, because the average intelligent person almost always makes the mistake in thinking that what is considered a metaphor today was considered a metaphor back then.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 You yourself making the very same mistake when suggesting that God was commanding His people to "eat" there children. Yes I can see your point. You dont know the bible as well as you thought, I can see this...
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Then you should now know that the Bible teaches a flat earth. "Corners" and "ends" were not metaphors. They are TODAY...now after we've proven the Bible incorrect. And no, I'm not making any mistake concerning metaphors. There is no way that you can convince anyone but fools that the author was writing God's forcing parents to eat their children to be just a "metaphor". Lol. The only mistake I see is a fool believing fairytales. Christianity is a fairytale for grown-ups.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Read the verses in their context when the Bible talks about a flat earth, A ROUND GLOBE SHAPED EARTH SUSPENDED IN SPACE, and the four corners of the earth. And if you are clever enough, thats a big IF, you will see that these verses indeed speak factual and metaphoricaly when read within their context. You would seriously have to be a clown to miss this. Or worse yet, a fool. At least a clown gets paid.... Dumb is forever....
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 As I said, the writers of the Bible believed that the Earth was flat, and that is obvious from what they wrote in the Bible. It makes sense since at the time and in the area where they lived, that was the popular belief. The Bible is clear that it speaks of a flat earth and as I said, persons constantly make the mistake of thinking that because something is a metaphor now, that it was a metaphor always. That's not the case with the Biblical flat earth.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 When wrong, Christian fools have the pleasure of falling back on these cop-out defenses; that something is either just a metaphor or that we're taking something out of context. You Christians say the Bible is 100% true, until we prove something in it wrong, and you make up the excuse that it was just a metaphor or that it was taken out of context...all to keep your precious but ultimately flawed Bible as the word of God...even though it's the word of shit.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 When someone says “the four corners of the Earth” today, it is obviously a metaphor. But back then within the Near East, when somebody said this, that is what they actually meant. Remember that metaphors almost ALWAYS evolve from concepts which were meant to be taken literally at one time. It’s just like when we talk about our software having “bugs”. This is because a long time ago, there really was a real bug that was causing a computer to experience trouble.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Today you say it is used as a metaphor and not back then, again, says you, o powerful and great, "fool." How the heck do you know. So the Bible was speaking in a literal sence was it, when it mentions the four corners of the earth, DUH! No your wrong again. They knew clearly that the earth was globe shaped, and were not confused like you. Job 26:10 the earth IS described as if being in motion. Isaiah 40:22 (Not the compass of the horizon due to the detailed explaination....
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Says me and all the historians. Your own Bible proves it. But you're the kind of guy that can take a Dr. Suess book and convince many naive persons that it provides answers to the meaning of life while scientifically explaining the whole process of how molecules behave to turn gas into plasma. So you're going to believe anything you want, despite what the Bible actually says. Someone could sneeze, and you'll make an argument that it explains the hydrological cycle! Lol!
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 If you think you are right, then the Hebrews though the earth was both flat and globe shaped at the same time, or are the verses I quoted spoken as metaphors also. No, You door knob.... The earth is clearly described as being suspended in Space, Job 26:7 (Not a Metaphor)
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 I don't think; I know. It's a fact that ancient homosapiens knew the Earth was a sphere except for the Middle East, who believed that the Earth was like a disc or square. The Bible is not the only literature which shows this to be true. No literature from that time and place suggests that the Earth is a sphere. Christians have been desperately trying to connect the Bible to the facts we now know ever since scientists have proven this Christian belief to be incorrect.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 What you would like to do, is simply call something in the Bible a metaphor when it doesn’t quite work out for you, & then talk about all of these amazing scientific "facts" in the Bible when they happen to make sense today. The ironic thing is, many of these so-called scientific "facts" come from these poetic Bible books, & you are taking the very Biblical verses which were actually MEANT by the authors to be metaphorical, & claiming them as scientific truth!
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 But in any case, the Bible clearly teaches a flat, non-spherical earth. Fact. Christians are delusional. Fact.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Isaac Newton was not stupid. He was extremely smart. But back then, referring to his Christian beliefs, when scientific knowledge was still in its infancy, scientists such as him still did not know any better. If he were alive today, not only would he be an atheist, but he'd be on here right now educating Christians on how stupid they are.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 There exists a lenthy list of scientists in every field of scientific study on creationontheweb answersingenesis and many other christian and non christian websites. These men and women have more accumulated knowledge and experience than your minute brain could fathom, and you say they are stupid, because they have reasonable for why they believe what they believe. it is your short comings of the evidence that proves foolish
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Anyone who believes in made-up answers to satisfy questions, instead of what the evidence shows is not a scientist. No mainstream scientists take these persons seriously. Even if you were to consider these persons scientists, 99% of all scientists are atheists and dismiss all religious superstitious bullshit. Answers in Genesis is known for being biased and interpreting scripture to fit their own immoral personalities. No one takes them seriously either. Lol.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 99% lols, this is BS my friend. AGAIN, show me evidence for this 99% of "all" scientists. Besides Majority opinion does not determin truth. You keep using the word evidence like you know something we all dont. Is there any mutation in macro evolution that has produced or added new information to human dna. Poor Dawkins fell flat on his face trying to answer this question. He, like yourself have never observed any mutation that has added a little information to the human genome
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Yes, 99 percent…perhaps more. Real scientists don’t use faith because faith is the complete opposite of science. So as you can see, it really doesn’t make sense for a scientist to be a Christian. You cannot be the color red if you’re already the color green. You cannot be ice if you are liquid water. You simply cannot be a Christian and a scientist. It’s impossible.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 The evidence that a true scientist sees reveals to him that in the first cause there must have been an intelligent designer. You may believe that we came from an explosion, with no answer for where the matter or gases came from for that explosion. Thats real faith in action. However it is easier and more intelligent to believe in a divine creator which does not fly in the face of science.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 The evidence that a true scientist sees reveals to them real truth and not the fantasy that other non-scientists want to believe. Your own logic works against you, for if we all required an intelligent designer, then so did that intelligent designer. Eventually, you're going to have to realize that a god is not necessary. The evidence for the big bang is overwhelming, and there is no evidnece for a god. All the answers will come to us as long as we abandon superstition.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nickmorrison1100 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God (Gen 1:1) so that the things which are seen (us) were not made of things which are visible (Atoms) Hebrews 11:3.. Energy is indiscernible and so are atoms, molecules and gases to the naked eye, yet combined they become visible. The bible agrees perfectly that the entire creation was made of invisible elements called "Atoms" Colossians 1:16 Romans 1:20-21. Put that in your pipe and smoke it..
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 "Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God (Gen 1:1) so that the things which are seen (us) were not made of things which are visible (Atoms) Hebrews 11:3.. Energy is indiscernible and so are atoms, molecules and gases to the naked eye, yet combined they become visible. The bible agrees perfectly that the entire creation was made of invisible elements called "Atoms""
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What are you smoking?!!!!
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 You seriously just tried to convince me that the Bible teaches about atoms with this pathetic verse?! Seriously? You're even more stupid than I thought. Hey stupid, this just proves even more what I've been saying all along. You can take anything in the Bible and interpret it to say anything you want it to. There is no way in Hell any reasonably intelligent person could be fooled by your bullshit. In no way, shape, or form, does that verse teach anything close about atoms.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nickmorrison1100 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God (Gen 1:1) so that the things which ((((are seen ))))(us) were not made of things which ((((((are visible))))) (Atoms) It explains somthing that is an actual fact... Coincidence, I think not, inspired by God, I think so..
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 And you know it too. A science teacher can't just tell their class to open the Bible to page such and such and say, "Okay now, what are these verses talking about here?", and one of the students will say "It's talking about atoms." "That's correct." says the teacher. "Anything else?" "Yes." says one of the students. "According to the Bible, there are electrons and protons and gold is an element." "Good job." Yeah right. Give me a break.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Like I said, you could take a shit or blow your nose, and you could convince yourself that the feces or mucus would be teaching you about the origin of the universe. The Bible doesn't teach shit about atoms. The Bible doesn't teach shit about the hydrological cycle. The Bible doesn't teach shit but inaccurate things about science and history, and how to hate everyone.
But again, show me where it teaches about atoms, and then I'll be impressed.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 And no, majority opinion does not determine truth. It’s a good thing that scientists do not base their truths on their opinions, but on scientific evidence. And it’s true, I seem to know what evidence is, and you haven’t a clue. Evidence does not come in the form of a book written thousands of years ago by men who claimed to see gods. Evidence is not the same as faith (desired truth), which is all that Christians use to determine their fairytale beliefs.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Every reproduction results in mutations. And yes, it is these mutations which cause macroevolution. Richard Dawkins has answered this question just fine. You are no doubt referring to a video in which he was asked this question, and it was rudely edited in order to deceive the public into thinking that he couldn’t answer. Deception is what Christianity is all about, as is foolishness, which is why there is no doubt that you would be fooled by such deception.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 The Video is called "from a frog to a prince" where Dawkins is dumb founded. I have the "uncut" version here with me. Some hard done by athiest made his own boggie video because he seen his poor "god" dawkins hard done by... And like the video states, no nutation has ever added NEW information to the genome. Already existing information mutating is called "micro" evolution. We dont see any species becoming something new, do we now : )
YouMustBeBornAgain1 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 If someone blew their nose and told you that the mucus was the incarnation of Jesus, you would believe it, so it doesn't surprise me that you would allow yourself to be fooled by deceptive videos. As I said, the video you watched and foolishly believed was just another deceptive trick by Creationists to try and make evolutionists look like they're incorrect about evolutionary fact. As I said, Dawkins was never stumped and has answered this question just fine in the past.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 If someone blew their nose you would probably say, O look everyone, the first stages of life have begun, from poo to you,,,, LoL's which is what most evolutionists believe (by faith) can you show me some evidence for the first stages of "evolved" life (lol's) keep on dreaming of finding them "missing" links, duh! and double duh!!! tey and make them look like they are incorrect, you do a pretty good job of that Alone....
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Actually, evolutionists don't believe that. Mucus and poo do not meet the requirements for producing life. You might be able to make yourself believe that they can reveal miracles to you, but that would just be your delusion talking. And we don't need faith to believe in evolution, we have the evidence which shows that it's factual. But I know you'd rather believe that a man with a white beard on a cloud made everyone through magic. Makes perfect sense.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 You are another example of Creationists embarrassing themselves by believing in false information, kind of like how you believe in false gods. Type in "richard dawkins stumped by creationists' question", and you will find the video where Mr. Dawkins explains these deceptive practices. By the way, I watched that video you mentioned, and it's complete bullshit. Since this video obviously deceives its audience, how can any information in there be trusted? Creationism=fairytale.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 So anyway, now that I've shown you to be wrong yet again, I'll address your other issues. Yes, mutations DO add new information to the genome. We already know this. As for microevolution vs macroevolution, like all Creationists, you don't understand the process of evolution. You believe that evolutionists claim that a lizard can just give birth to a chicken, and it doesn't work that way. That's not how evolution works. This is what your programming has caused you to believe.
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Again, show me the fossils for the intermediate changes within any species..... such waffle seems to spew out of your mouth. it smells worse than what probably comes out your other end.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Lol. Everyone you see is a transitional form you idiot. Do you know anything about homo-erectus or neanderthals? Have you ever seen a chimpanzee? A monkey? Gorilla? Doh! What about elephants, mammoths, mastadons? Doh! Why do you think that dolphins are sometimes born with legs, or why humans are still born with more than two nipples? Doh! I won't overload you with scientific terms because I know you're too stupid to handle it, but the evidence for evolution is overwhelming.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 The "ape-men" claims often based on fragments remains which are more open to interpretatation,but when more bones are found,the specimens are found to be either man or non-man, (eg, australopithecine) neither transitional nor "mosaic". E.g. analysis of a number of characteristics shows that H. ergaster, H. erectus, H. heidelbergensis, & H. neanderthalensis were most likely racial variants of modern man, while H. rudolfensis and H. habilis were just types of australopithecines.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 I don't know where you copied this text from, but I doubt you even understand what it means. Anyways, all of these fossils clearly show humans all have a common ancestor and show a transition from more primitive primates to more modern ones. Seriously, please look at a monkey.
nickmorrison1100 9 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Ape men huh: )You should keep the word yourself. Not one of your replies surrenders any "evidence" of Macro Evolution. Many evolutionists support whale evolution by alleging that there are vestigial hind legs buried in their flesh.However these so-called "remnants" are not useless at all, but help strengthen the reproductive organs the bones are different in males and females,so they are best explained by creation, not evolution. Listen to Mike Riddle on human "evolution"
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Again, I don't know where you copied this text from, but everything you copied here is complete bullshit. Vestigial organs are left over from a lifeform's primitive previous life forms. Whether or not they provide SOME usefulness, or none, it is obviously a sign of evolution. An intelligent creator would NOT create an animal with a vestigial organ. Your kind is simply trying to think of any excuse to desperately keep your fairytale alive.
nickmorrison1100 9 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 And while the evidence for evolution is overwhelming, you don't have any evidence for creation. Not one bit of evidence. You'd think that if your evil god was so powerful, that he'd be able to make himself a bit more known to the world, but he's weak...actually, he's not real.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 ALL evolution, including the process of reptiles evolving to mammals, involves microevolution. Macroevolution is only the result of many microevolutionary processes adding up over time and through many generations. And yes, we DO see species becoming something new, but you're too close-minded to listen to true science. You are too comfortable in your world of fairytales to see reality anymore. What a sad world you live in...unable to distinguish reality from fantasy... :(
nickmorrison1100 11 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Name your transitional species so, I yet to see one. And micro evolution is not "evolution" at all duh! And it is certianly not "little" examples of Macro evolution. Such is the fairy tale world you live in with yrt again, no evidence for a mutation producing new information.
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Microevolution IS evolution. That is the only way that evolution happens and is the only way that macroevolution happens. Macroevolution is the result of many changes of many generations through many years.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 It's like paints. You seem to think that evolution teaches that red can just turn into orange, but that's NOT what evolution teaches. Instead, it teaches that if you add a tiny drop of yellow one year, it DOES turn slightly orange, but the effects are too small to see. Yet if you keep adding this same amount every year, eventually, perhaps after a thousand years, it will start to look orange. That is how microevolution produces macroevolution. That is evolution bitch.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 So small they dont even happen, because you have yet to give a soild example of an observation for 1. intermediate fossil, 2. observable mutation adding new information which leads to that "red to orange" Your head is fuzzy friend, very fuzzy. The evidence for creation is overwhelming. micro evolution does not produce Macro evolution, such waffle. You have slight changes within a kind, not a magical leap from one kind to another, which is your dream like state
YouMustBeBornAgain1 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Incorrect. So small you don't see them, but they're there, and become evident over an immense length of time. And that is how microevolution produces macroevolution. Macroevolution does not exist without many instances of microevolution. This magical leap from one "kind" to another is nowhere to be found in evolution, because it never happens. Lifeforms evolve through many small evolutionary changes over a long period of time to produce significant different lifeforms.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Observed intermediate fossils? There are thousands +, so I obviously can't list them all here. One of the most famous examples is Archaeopteryx, which has the feathers and skeletal structure of birds and also features of dinosaurs. There are MANY examples of feathered dinosaurs, such as velociraptors. Everyone knows birds evolved from dinosaurs. You want more observation? Scientists have been able to turn back on genes in chickens to revert them back to having dino traits.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago
@nickmorrison1100 Archaeopteryx, Yes a bird that lived 150 million years ago lol's like the elephant bird: ) However Alan Feduccia a world authority on birds at the University of North Carolina at chapel Hill an evolutionist Himself, disagrees with this, he states, Its a bird, a perching bird and no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that. The cover of time magazine even illustrated it with feathers, although not the slightest trace of feathers had been found. Such fiction, tut tut...
YouMustBeBornAgain1 9 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Yes, Archaeopteryx is a bird that lived 150 million years ago, and is the perfect transitional fossil between dinosaurs and birds. Everything that you copied just now from some website in no way refutes this fact. Not the slightest trace of feathers were found? Lol. More proof that you talk out of your asshole. Feathers were among the most obvious features of this transitional form. It is a known fact that it had feathers. You have no appreciation for education do you...
nickmorrison1100 9 months ago
@YouMustBeBornAgain1 Snakes, with their feet and similar DNA to lizards are a clear transitional lifeform. We have observed genetic mutations in fruit flies, witnessed the change of species in mosquitoes, we have seen how humans are still born with more than two nipples, dolphins with legs, etc. The evidence goes on and on, and continues to grow every day.
nickmorrison1100 10 months ago