Added: 2 years ago
From: Historystartsnow
Views: 38,502
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (46)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • That yo-yo maneuver would bring your breakfast up!

  • Comment removed

  • @e081194eng They're not free when they have no other choice.

  • F-4 Phantom was designed to shoot down Russian bombers. F-4 pilots were not prepared to tangle with Mig's. In fact the first kill of the Vietnam War in 1965 was when Mig-17 shot down F-105. There were more NVA aces than American aces. US NAvy had to spend millions to train their pilots in better tactics to prevent getting shot down by the obsolete Migs. All this propaganda is trying to mask the fact that US weapons designers put American pilots in danger

  • so, wheres the mig21's?

  • I really need to get my hands on this series.

  • Maybe one of this series of Vietnam in the future can also show some of the combats of Nguyen Doc Soat. He downed with his MiG-21 four F-4 Phantoms and one A-7B...

  • Interesting how from this documentary you'd imagine that no USAF aircraft was ever lost over the skyes of Vietnam. Suffice to say that the F105 had to be withdrawn due to the excessive casualties inflicted by an ageing and way less numerous airforce.

  • @psychohydra ...and 34 state of the art mega expensive F-4s were shot down by those old, subsonic Mig 17s that couldn't even carry missiles. But that would not look good to the average redneck viewer would it?

  • @nomtai

    Except for the fact that Israel would push that margin so hard showing how much of a piece of shit the 21 really was.

    All russian dog fighting tech is queer, it might as well say insert cock here.

    You got a queer SU, you got a queer SU.

  • @LgndryThndr Yes, push that margin,but with a Mirage ,my stupid friend...

  • @vukidaca

    >Implying the phantom didn't kick the 21's ass to a 5 to 85 ratio.

    You think that turning like the japanese means strength or honor, NIGGA PLEASE!

    It means queer SU, you like the queer Su!

    Any by queer, I just mean bad!

    It wouldn't mean gay unless you had!

    A flying triangle with a red star flag!

    With a tube for a nose and Over rated by commies who are on the rag!

    And thats a queer mig too, a literally queer mig too!

  • Couldn't he hit the F-105 with his gun?

  • Man that MiG-17 pilot during that turn at 4:40 - 4:43 and 4:50 to 4:51 must have really bent the hell out of his control column (that did happen sometimes -- at least one test pilots evaluating a MiG-17 who's pilot defected had that happen to him) to pull that off!

  • LOL tuff

    

  • I love the F-4

  • not fair

    the Mig-17 don´t evan have guidet missils...xDD

  • Don't worry, I went to the Vietnam Air Force Museum in Saigon 1 week ago and it showed the engagements where the Vietnamese pilots came out on top.

  • It's weird they don't show dogfights that the americans lost. In my opinion, the Vietnam War was the last time the americans saw heavy air-combat. In recent wars, the MiGs are no match for their modern planes. Although, with the MiG-35, and the PAK-FA, the east might be catching up.

  • @AstroChickenII You should not worry. MiG-35 is nothing but old MiG-29. And FAK-PA, sorry ), PAK-FA aka T-50 is nothing but fiction. Do you remember Mikoyan's 1.42 and 1.44? Can you remember Su-47? Where are they? The FUK-pa is another project to steal the money. Russian "stealth" means to steal "greenbacks"

  • @hillbillyboy77 I wasn't worrying, I was just saying its intresting. The Su-47 and MiG 1.42 and 1.44 were just technology demonstrators. I think the PAK FA does exist.

  • @AstroChickenII  Hi AstroChickenII. You certainly don't have to worry cause you live in a country where the government and generals do not steal national budget.

    P.S. The project 1.42/44 was not a demonstrator, it was an absolutely real project started in the USSR in the begining of the 80s. It should be a competitor to YF-22. But as usual the money was stolen and the project was closed in 2000. After that some criminal case were initiated. All that in vain. History makes round..

  • @hillbillyboy77 How do you know what country I live in?

  • @AstroChickenII I only click your nick and see you are from UK. It's as easy as you click my nick and see I'm from Russia.

  • @AstroChickenII Isn't the PAK-FA experimental?Or it has gone into production alreay?

  • @gtamodman122 They have a few prototypes. China's stealth fighter has no bomb bay doors, very early prototype.

  • Why didn't he use the sparrow @ 4:00 ? I mean the sparrow was a medium range radar missile but they weren't allowed to use it for bvr purposes right ? So this would be the ideal situation to use it right ? Correct me if I'm wrong plz :P

  • @chemogang remember it still can't a friendly from a foe and even if it could, if it misses it might hit the thud.

  • @chemogang

    It required a 3 second hold for targeting purposes.

    It required specific conditions to fire

    I've had entire racks just fall off my pylons, AM-7 missile failure was rampant, very prototype technology.

  • love this show

  • Yeah, don't play that fucking migs game.

    The mig has Horizontal agility and nothing else.

    The F4 had every advantage but his turn.

    Either drop power and let him gain and fire a missile in him.

    Or, take that shit Vertical.

  • @LgndryThndr Migs are much more valuable than horizontal flight. Migs are fantastic aircraft. Migs during the Vietnam War destroyed hundreds of phantoms and thundercheifs.

  • @TheMaverick46464

    Yet the kill ratio still stagnated for them to a 2 to 1 in favor of the phantom.

    Maybe if the Phantoms were allowed to engage beyond Visual ID the Aim7 could have been more viable.

  • @LgndryThndr And probably the "blue on blue" situations would have rise beyond acceptable levels.

  • @historystartsnow: DEFINITELY should've kept the guns!!

    @whitesox889: WHAT is a vector roll?!

  • I have GOT to order this series.

  • Damn Mig-17 leave the "Thuds" alone!

  • @TuAFFalcon They're only defending their country

  • Ye i know. War is shitty business.

  • @TheMaverick46464

    >Implying russians weren't in migs behind the U.N.'s back.

  • @TheMaverick46464 No, they were attacking the South.

  • @TuAFFalcon The Thud is also a MiG Killer, it destroyed several MiG-17s

  • @MultiMaxy95 It did, and most of the F-105's kills were scored with its M61 cannon. Makes you wonder what the Air Force brass was thinking: Equip F-105 fighter-bombers with guns, but not F-4 Phantoms? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot

  • @TuAFFalcon Stupid Americans/Western Imperialistic Dicktators that always attack smaller inocent countries without no reason! Glorty to Free Vietnam!

  • Do a vector roll!

  • thank you SOOOO MUCH!!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more