excuse me, but the solution is definitely not "nuking everyone".
everyone exhales co2, but the thing is that plants dont take in co2 and turn it into oxygen. they use co2, but they take water and split the molecule into oxygen and hydrogen, so plan on "nuking" plants too.
This video induces no fear in me. I understood all that he was talking about to begin with. What does induce some fear in me, are the comments reflecting an extreme and voluntary absence of awareness of the future our children face. Does this truly represent a cross section of our populace? A virus mindlessly reproduces, disabling & killing its host, due to its consumption & wake of destruction. That's what I see here. Genetic suicide. Its your funeral. Do you have to kill your children too?
I am so sick of this temperature stuff! CO2 is a human waste product! Digging up prehistoric CO2 and pumping it into the air can not be good! I don't give a damn about the temperature!
Yeah! Humans are breathing out CO2 all the time! So are animals! Waste products!! Nuking them all is the only answer.
CO2 is not toxic or in any way dangerous to human life, in the miniscule concerntrations found in the atmosphere of 0.036-0.039%. You need 1% before you even see an effect on people, 30x that rate. The only problem with it is the greenhouse effect.
Exactly. Pumping CO2 into the atmosphere would actually be a great idea if not for the temperature thing. Plants thrive in CO2 rich environments, they often pump CO2 into greenhouses to encourage growth.
reporters dont lie they entertain, millions dying in Africa entertaining, Africans using micro credit and cellphones for well being not. Looking at emails scientist, entertaining, graphs of temperatures over long periods of time not. There is no deception its just nobody wants truth and reality, they want shock value.
How about we started calling all those hippocrites "regular climate change deniers" or "reason deniers" or "the counterevidence-hits-you-in-the-face sceptics" or "even the unveiling of your own fraud doesn't seem to cut your hypocrite and fraudulous babbling"?
I sure think there are many inventive ways of getting the message out... that playing with numbers to your liking doesn't quite make for science... and above all, it doesn't make for workable technology.
First, Mr. MIT, TV coverage is near 95% Pro alarmist...,not 50%.
All the record years were in...1930's. For example, new Zealand RAW data showed 0.06/century, but the cooked data showed 0.9/century, that 15(!) times.
The RATE of increase from 1600-1800 is the SAME as 1880-now with a 100 year pause.
When you "educate" a fool, you get a predictable fool.
99.9% of the world are liars where do u think these truthers r gonna come from?
Liars: nationalists, religion, the faithful.. If you take anything as fact on faith you become the voice of lies.. If you can't identify the lies in your life how the he'll do you expect to identify the truth? Please don't say gut feeling, that is also a lie...
i agree but i think the east and west are just as guilty. if a person embraces this notion a lot of what they stand on will begin to shatter as they realize that fiction has governed them for so long... it's a realization like nothing else!
Because they are lying the emails (have have downloaded and read some of them) showed that they were changing the figures not just a little but allot; this should not be a surprise as the IPCC was created by Margret Thatcher, to support the industry of nuclear power.
"they were changing the figures not just a little but allot"
It shows no such thing. What the emails show is that these scientists were performing standard data cleaning techniques. One that's brought up a lot, "hiding the decline", for instance, refers to a solution to a well known problem in climatology, in which tree ring temp estimates were inconsistent with measured temperatures. It's called the 'divergence problem'. Hiding the decline simply means using the REAL recorded temperatures.
The adjectives being employed like 'dire' and the world going 'haywire'. Phrases like the more people know the more dire they realise it is. For me it has been the opposite. The more I know the more i see the exaggeration of the proponents for AGW. i was a 'green' person 2 years and believed in AGW. I hate pollution but I now see AGW as a big hyperbole and a fraud. i did enough science to appreciate all the nuances and arguments in this debate.
@chrysos101 "I now see AGW as a big hyperbole and a fraud."
Sorry, that's not enough. But youcan publish your findings so it eventually enters consensus reflected in e.g. school books. What are you waiting for?
@needs evidence :consensus is not the scientific way. That is argumentum ad populum. There is no consensus anyway. We have a hard job undoing the harm that Maurice Strong, Phil Jones,Ken Lay et alia have been perpetrating for a long time.
The fact that it is in text books shows it is the hoax of the century.
@blaiko about 98% of the earths warmth comes from the sun. So the variance in the amount of the sun's rays will obviously affect the temperature and climate on the earth. It is the main driver for climate change. You do not need a computer model from the University of East Anglia's CRU to figure that out.
did you create that name just for this guy. Interesting attitude he has, I guy on the internet have everything figured out and everyone is wrong exp me so believe what i say.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
for real ?! this guy is like one step away from being a conspiracy theorist. claiming that you know the science without discussing science doesn't make you right. The IPCC report called for raises in temperatures with no significant cooling trends.
ah what the hell, call me a denier or a climate change atheist, I don't care kid.
This has been flagged as spam show
hey! this is awesome! Keep it going
donabrenes 4 months ago
excellent vid! lovin' the vibe..take care always!
trippemallory 4 months ago
Comment removed
xchelsx514 1 year ago
excuse me, but the solution is definitely not "nuking everyone".
everyone exhales co2, but the thing is that plants dont take in co2 and turn it into oxygen. they use co2, but they take water and split the molecule into oxygen and hydrogen, so plan on "nuking" plants too.
xchelsx514 1 year ago
This video induces no fear in me. I understood all that he was talking about to begin with. What does induce some fear in me, are the comments reflecting an extreme and voluntary absence of awareness of the future our children face. Does this truly represent a cross section of our populace? A virus mindlessly reproduces, disabling & killing its host, due to its consumption & wake of destruction. That's what I see here. Genetic suicide. Its your funeral. Do you have to kill your children too?
DonQuixotedeKaw 2 years ago
I am so sick of this temperature stuff! CO2 is a human waste product! Digging up prehistoric CO2 and pumping it into the air can not be good! I don't give a damn about the temperature!
57beachbum 2 years ago
@57beachbum
Yeah! Humans are breathing out CO2 all the time! So are animals! Waste products!! Nuking them all is the only answer.
CO2 is not toxic or in any way dangerous to human life, in the miniscule concerntrations found in the atmosphere of 0.036-0.039%. You need 1% before you even see an effect on people, 30x that rate. The only problem with it is the greenhouse effect.
Saktoth 2 years ago
everyone knows co2 is int toxic, it doesn't matter what it is but the impact. Guns aren't toxic either
zxcvbnmjhgfdsa1 2 years ago
Exactly. Pumping CO2 into the atmosphere would actually be a great idea if not for the temperature thing. Plants thrive in CO2 rich environments, they often pump CO2 into greenhouses to encourage growth.
Saktoth 2 years ago
wow reporters ( does not apply to him ! ) need more help from scientists ? what on how to lie -- what a dumb ass this man is
tonythatjesusloves 2 years ago
reporters dont lie they entertain, millions dying in Africa entertaining, Africans using micro credit and cellphones for well being not. Looking at emails scientist, entertaining, graphs of temperatures over long periods of time not. There is no deception its just nobody wants truth and reality, they want shock value.
zxcvbnmjhgfdsa1 2 years ago
science will always get to the public slowly, because propaganda is the antithesis of science.
merdufer 2 years ago 2
How about we started calling all those hippocrites "regular climate change deniers" or "reason deniers" or "the counterevidence-hits-you-in-the-face sceptics" or "even the unveiling of your own fraud doesn't seem to cut your hypocrite and fraudulous babbling"?
I sure think there are many inventive ways of getting the message out... that playing with numbers to your liking doesn't quite make for science... and above all, it doesn't make for workable technology.
realisoph 2 years ago
What a garbage interview.
First, Mr. MIT, TV coverage is near 95% Pro alarmist...,not 50%.
All the record years were in...1930's. For example, new Zealand RAW data showed 0.06/century, but the cooked data showed 0.9/century, that 15(!) times.
The RATE of increase from 1600-1800 is the SAME as 1880-now with a 100 year pause.
When you "educate" a fool, you get a predictable fool.
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago 2
@ cosmosprivateer
99.9% of the world are liars where do u think these truthers r gonna come from?
Liars: nationalists, religion, the faithful.. If you take anything as fact on faith you become the voice of lies.. If you can't identify the lies in your life how the he'll do you expect to identify the truth? Please don't say gut feeling, that is also a lie...
Th3Wab3 2 years ago
There only is relative meaning... instead of absolute truth... not so difiicult to graps... but western minds have a hard time to get it.
realisoph 2 years ago 2
i agree but i think the east and west are just as guilty. if a person embraces this notion a lot of what they stand on will begin to shatter as they realize that fiction has governed them for so long... it's a realization like nothing else!
cheers
Th3Wab3 2 years ago
@Th3Wab3
I wasn't telling the truth, I don't know what that is.
I could say I don't care what the truth is because it's too hard to find.
I could also say that truth is only what our minds care to make of it.
Truth in my words can only be measured by my ability to believe in them.
I do know one truth my fingers are getting tired from typing this crap.
Peace and have a great solstice.
CosmosPrivateer 2 years ago
Comment removed
Th3Wab3 2 years ago
@ Cosmosprivateer
true enough
cheers
Th3Wab3 2 years ago
He is in the pay of the global warming industrial complex!
The pay good, I've heard!
PerStrand 2 years ago
In the pay of the global warming industrial complex. Brilliant. Do you happen to mean the fossil fuel industrial complex?
tdsinfo 2 years ago
Well spoken, Chris Mooney. I'd like to read your book.
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago
Fora TV - The world is melting.
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago
Cap and trade bubble will burst 2015 and we will end up 100 times worse than now coz "we" did'nt do the right thing in Copenhagen..
kaxitaksi 2 years ago
The IPCC report has no credibility
blaiko 2 years ago
@blaiko because?
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago
Because they are lying the emails (have have downloaded and read some of them) showed that they were changing the figures not just a little but allot; this should not be a surprise as the IPCC was created by Margret Thatcher, to support the industry of nuclear power.
blaiko 2 years ago
@blaiko Blah blah blah :-)
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago
"they were changing the figures not just a little but allot"
It shows no such thing. What the emails show is that these scientists were performing standard data cleaning techniques. One that's brought up a lot, "hiding the decline", for instance, refers to a solution to a well known problem in climatology, in which tree ring temp estimates were inconsistent with measured temperatures. It's called the 'divergence problem'. Hiding the decline simply means using the REAL recorded temperatures.
werecow2003 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This guy is an alarmist! Trying to spread fear and despondency!!
chrysos101 2 years ago
@chrysos101 Can you support your claims with evidence?
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago
The adjectives being employed like 'dire' and the world going 'haywire'. Phrases like the more people know the more dire they realise it is. For me it has been the opposite. The more I know the more i see the exaggeration of the proponents for AGW. i was a 'green' person 2 years and believed in AGW. I hate pollution but I now see AGW as a big hyperbole and a fraud. i did enough science to appreciate all the nuances and arguments in this debate.
chrysos101 2 years ago
@chrysos101 "I now see AGW as a big hyperbole and a fraud."
Sorry, that's not enough. But youcan publish your findings so it eventually enters consensus reflected in e.g. school books. What are you waiting for?
@chrysos101 "i did enough science..."
And? I have a PhD in particle physics. So what? For a laymen only the scientific consensus is relevant.
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago
@needs evidence :consensus is not the scientific way. That is argumentum ad populum. There is no consensus anyway. We have a hard job undoing the harm that Maurice Strong, Phil Jones,Ken Lay et alia have been perpetrating for a long time.
The fact that it is in text books shows it is the hoax of the century.
chrysos101 2 years ago
Have you looked at the sun spots theory?
blaiko 2 years ago
@blaiko about 98% of the earths warmth comes from the sun. So the variance in the amount of the sun's rays will obviously affect the temperature and climate on the earth. It is the main driver for climate change. You do not need a computer model from the University of East Anglia's CRU to figure that out.
chrysos101 2 years ago
did you create that name just for this guy. Interesting attitude he has, I guy on the internet have everything figured out and everyone is wrong exp me so believe what i say.
zxcvbnmjhgfdsa1 2 years ago
why should Chrysos when this loser didn't bother himself, this video is just of him.
LeGioNoFZioN 2 years ago
The problem has for a long time been the liars.
The liars have ruled this world for thousands of years.
Their time is up though and the truth is on its way.
CosmosPrivateer 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
for real ?! this guy is like one step away from being a conspiracy theorist. claiming that you know the science without discussing science doesn't make you right. The IPCC report called for raises in temperatures with no significant cooling trends.
ah what the hell, call me a denier or a climate change atheist, I don't care kid.
LeGioNoFZioN 2 years ago
@LeGioNoFZioN doobeedooobeeedooo :-)
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago
yup
LeGioNoFZioN 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Interview Steven Jones of East Anglia climategate fame, oh yeah, he's not giving interviews!!!
777CARL777 2 years ago