@BewareTheBeast ...says the person who chooses, to accompany a video entitled "Where have all the real Britons gone?", an Austrian Christmas carol. You couldn't make it up...
@rewboss Silent Night has been sung in this country for years. The fact that it is Germanic, only makes me more proud of my British/Western european heritage. After all English IS a Germanic language.
@BewareTheBeast English is also an Indo-European language, a group that includes nearly every language in Europe and several in south Asia. On the other hand, the Austrians have more in common with the Slavs than they do with the Angles and Saxons. Besides, if Silent Night has been sung in Britain for years, immigrants have been living in Britain for generations, so I'm not sure what your point is.
@rewboss No, english is a Germanic language which is of Indo-european origin (they think). My point is, that while you have stripped the UK of all of it's culture & heritage, please allow me to use 'silent night' without critisism - you can still heap coals on your own funeral pyre after that.
Hmm we in the New Hope Party do not trust you, the BPP or your supposed far-right credentials for the simple reason that you do not have a small mostache, we don't trust people who have the ability to grow a small mostache and don't!
your making the white race look like a bunch of cunts, you do realise tht dnt ya. your making a mocary out of england. this is serious read mein kampf, freedom and reality by enoch powell then use the balls between your legs and beat some darkys its people like you that destroyed C18 and white wolfs and give a bad name the the rest of us
@fawcett94102 No, I'm making a mockery of white supremacists like you, who don't actually speak for "the white race", whatever that might be. But you're not helping your own case: perhaps if you learnt to spell and punctuate correctly, you might make yourself look a bit less stupid.
But thank you. I now don't need to make any more videos of this type. All I have to do is copy and paste your comment, and let you make a mockery of yourself.
Taking shots at the BNP in the style of a 1970's skinhead nazi merely highlights your lack of understanding. Granted there was a time when the stereotype you portray was singular in class and isolate in cause. Blame the far left elite for the fact that these days it's not the case.
There are no far left elite in Britain. Labour are centre right now, the tories always were centre right and the lib dems vaguely in the middle. The CPGB etc. have no power whatsoever, so what 'far left elite' are you talking about?
Why can't we enslave the scots? I mean really, if there was ever an ignorant, unintelligible population...plus, they'd fight all the other foreigners for every pence!
@cerealthrilla "Ignorant and unintelligible"? This from somebody who doesn't know to capitalise the word "Scot" and doesn't understand the distinction between "penny", "pennies" and "pence"?
Anyway, you may sit there and attempt to make a witty little video all about a political party's policies but let me ask you, are you quite happy to see uncontrolled immigration continue for many years to come despite what it may cause? Do you think we should just ignore the rumblings underneath the surface of many people who live on this island who do not vote BNP yet feel fed up at what they see as cultural eradification ?
You seem to like poking fun yet are very short on an alternative view
You're asking loaded questions. Immigration is not uncontrolled. There are problems and people are worried about them, but very few of them see the BNP or even UKIP as a viable alternative. Your own answers make no sense: you say the BNP doesn't advocate forced repatriation, but many immigrants will risk their lives to come to the UK, so how do you make them want to leave if you don't use force? And: "You believe everything you see on TV"? You mean the BNP lie in interviews?
I am asking YOU questions and you have put yourself in the firing line as it were yet you seem stuck on hard answers.
Immigration is NOT controlled, there are no limits to the amount of asylum seekers we let in, as long as they come across bonafide and if they can 'prove' in their own country they are persecuted we let them in, it's been government policy for years! Why do you think they manage to cross many borders in order to get here...because we are a soft touch, always have been.
No it doesn't as far as law abiding people who have come here go, they will deport ther illegal asylum seekers, people who should not be here in the first place aswell as the ones who come to this country and commit crimes but there is not a policy of enforced resettlement of anyone else, it's quite clear on their website as a statement of policy.
'But many immigrants will risk their lives to come to the UK'....and ?...is that our problem?...they simply choose the UK simply as to what i have said before, it's a well known fact they know they can settle here so much easier than any other country on the planet!
Why should we have to be the worlds 'dustbin' for refugees ?
The US, Canada and France are three countries that take on more immigrants than the UK. We send back illegal immigrants all the time. 30,000 non-asylum seekers were refused entry last year. And 70% of asylum seekers -- about 13,000 -- had their applications refused. The total number of people deported in 2008 was 7% up on 2007. I could go on, but I think you get the general idea.
Canada's immigration is based on per head of population whereas France appearing not to have that much info on immigrations stats have curbed immigration in this part of the century so not sure where you get that one from!
We have had a news story here predicting that the population will rise by 10 miilion in the next 20 years with 66% of that being from immigration from outside countries, At my reckoning that could mean we expand at the rate of almost 300,000 immigrants per year up until 2029
We have had in place a system of allowing immigrants to settle here for years and years, well that's fine i have no problem with that but the numbers have swelled so dramatically particularly from the religion of Islam and it's not just here, it's Europewide that many people are now witnessing a bloodless coup if you like, this isn't some kind of lie, it's fact and it's so stark staringly obvious that it begs belief how ignorant some people are of what's going on outside of their doors.
In case you're referring to that video about how Islam is poised to sweep across Europe, almost all the figures in that video are either made up or distorted beyond measure.
I can accept the figures are debatable but only a fool can't see that by and large 'that video' and it's underlying message is true regarding the colonisation of Islam into western Europe. We can debate figures till we are both blue in the face but it is without question that the demographical swell of Islam is significantly on the increase so your assumption appears wildly misjudged
The demographical swell of Islam is *not* significantly on the increase in Europe. The video is an outright lie. Fertility rates among whites is increasing, not decreasing. Fertility rates among Muslims is not any higher -- do you know any Muslim families with 8 children? No European official is predicting the islamification of Europe, and many of them are very upset at being misquoted in that film. Immigration levels are nowhere near what the film claims.
Rew, which planet do you live on and i am getting the feeling if i say black, you'll say white and vice-versa. I am really not sure what to say to you anymore as you clearly are not living on planet earth, have your eyes shut or well...i simply don't understand your logic.
Islam extolls the virtue of large families and thankfully my eyes are wide open in what i see in everyday life on 'British' streets along with many others. Foresight believe me is a virtue and it's a shame you don't....CONT
CONT ...appear to have any of that in abundance or can be open minded enough with your own eyes but mind you, living in a wonderful town like Glastonbury isn't exactly exposed to the swell of Islam so one could forgive you for that.
The film in all honesty isn't the issue here and it's a shame it seems to be the crux of the matter regarding this subject but it's 100% certain that Islam is on the rise at significant rates but i don't expect you to ever acknowledge that.
If you were paying attention, you'd know that I don't live in Glastonbury -- that's just where I was born. I have in my time lived in Wolverhampton and in Berlin, both cities of relatively high Muslim populations. I've been around, I've seen a lot.
You seem to think that Muslim families are large because you've heard that Islam encourages large families. I ask you again: Do you know any Muslim families with 8 children?
'I've been around, I've seen alot'...seems those comments purvey a sense of moral highground over anyone else's views you simply don't agree with, i've personally never felt i've had to advertise my crudentials to anyone.
It's not that i have heard Rew about how islamic families like to have large families, it's that i have seen and experienced it in it's reality, add to that it's encouraged through the teachings of Islam.
Oh and i have not answered your last point about do I know any muslim families with 8 children, nope afraid i don't but then i wasn't the one harping on about specific figures, i refer you to that video you mentioned......do pay attention Rew
Specific figures are the point. Specific figures make or break your argument, and specific figures directly contradict your view that Europe is about to be islamified.
You accused me of not having any experience of the real world, hence my comment that I have actually.
So what is your experience with large Muslim families, then? I'm not asking what you've heard about Islamic teaching (many Christian denominations also encourage large families), but what your actual experience is.
Rew, you seem to like twisting peoples comments on here and again, you continue to misquote or misinterpret me and this is frankly getting nowhere. You aren't after discussion or debate, you merely answer questions with another question which is clearly not advancing the subject matter, Youtube is hard enough but dealing with your intransigence leaves me just scratching my head in bewilderment.
Pardon me, but your last question was whether I was happy living in a society with uncontrolled immigration. My answer was that immigration isn't out of control. You countered that by saying, in effect, that it's common knowledge that Muslims have large families, and you claim to be able to back that up with personal evidence. I have asked you several times now to provide that evidence, but you refuse.
Regarding the statistics you posted yesterday about immigration rates, the ONS's actual figures estimate that 45% (not, as you claim, 66%) of the increase will come from immigration. However, the figures are based on data available up to mid 2008, and since then net migration has slowed by 44% and government policies on immigration have tightened. The ONS's figures are already down on similar estimates made earlier, and may have to be revised downwards again.
It would not cost much to repatriate them, in fact it would be cost effective as they could be sent back with the Benefit money lots of them recieve .If it was done in stages there would be no shortage of medical staff,ie for every British person that qualifies it would be possible to send one back to their country of origin until we have the health service fully manned up by British people and being paid the correct wages for the job.Which would also reduce illness in their own countries
The BNP manifesto claims the BNP will not force anyone to leave against their will, but will offer cash incentives to encourage them to leave. How much do you think you would need to pay a nurse to persuade her to go back to Zimbabwe right now? What will you do if they simply refuse to leave? If you forcibly repatriate them, how will you cope when other countries start forcibly repatriating millions of people like me back to the UK?
Well congratulations,you achieved what ya set out to do.Now go home and read the BNP manifesto,ya just might learn something or better still go live in an inner city multi cultural shit hole and se how British peolple are treat like shit
Well, the BNP manifesto doesn't even make sense -- for a start, how much do you suppose it's going to cost the British economy to "repatriate" everyone, and once that's done, how long before we can have fully staffed hospitals again? -- and I spent three years in Wolverhampton being treated conspicuously unlike shit.
You are missing one fundemental point here, every political party up until a general election has a murky kind of manifesto and if you have problems regarding the cost of what the BNP proposes why don't you ask them directly regarding this issue?
As for 'fully staffed hospitals', i think we have enough lazy scroungers in this country who need a kick up their arse into work rather than pander to their every whim in this socially kind society we have created for ourselves...oh and them.
I don't need to ask them directly about it: that's what TV interviews are for. And what they say in TV interviews is things like Jinnermac's answer to my question. Of course, if you want to try to staff our hospitals with "lazy scroungers", you'll just end up with hospitals staffed with unqualified lazy scroungers. I don't see how that's going to improve the quality of health care. Make them pick up litter if you must, but I won't have them giving me injections, thank you.
Oh so you believe everything you see on tv then? Isn't that a little naive ?
Maybe Jinnermac's point about the huge cost of benefits this country pays out can maybe given some creedence as to where the money wil come from but let's face it, none of us can say where they will raise the money from as that has not been put to the BNP so my original question still stands unanswered.
I'm guessing this is a pisstake just a shame we have a load of rasist twats commenting. The reason people vote for BNP is the same reason people vote for Hitler because they were stupid uninformed idiots who noded along and folloewed like sheep while everyone else talked bollocks also there was a econmic crisis (same a now) so to sum BNP Voters = Massive Stupid Twats.
Hmmm what was it that Winston Churchill said about fascists...i think it were along the lines of 'the real fascists are the anti fascists' ?
I can more than live with the fact i actually felt so proud and motivated to vote this time around for something i truly believe in.
Maybe you should ask yourself WHY almost a million people voted BNP at the euro elections ?....There is alot of disquiet about about how the left have made the UK into some cultural melting pot with no mandate.
yu thick basterd go and put yur leg down and say enuff to a foreignor yud get banged the fuck out yu fuckin racist for eyes basterd go and suck yur mom YOUR A JOKE MATE!
In a recent Government survey in Sweden it was found just over 10% of Swedish women aged 18 to 50 had been seriously sexually assaulted or raped by a muslim in the last twelve months.
Large parts of Southern Sweden are now no go areas for Swedish People and Police!
It's easy to criticise the idea of re-introducing slavery for non whites as racist , but when all these politically correct people get offered a free slave I bet they say yes!
i dont care i still dont want them twats on my streets, they have made no effort to intergrate with us and they are racist back to us mainly in there own language because there cowards. and yes i understand some urdu so i know when they are saying it.
and i dont fink u hav ne write 2 say nething if u have been living in berlin for the last 10 years since u dont have a clue whats really going on and only what the media portrays.
They're racist "back" to you? That implies you were racist to them first, does it not?
And how is my living for ten years among one of the largest Muslim populations in Central Europe not relevant? Your point was about Muslims in general: now it appears you're talking about only Muslims in England. Does this mean that there's something about England that makes Muslims go bad?
I lived there for 21 of the first 23 years of my life, three of them in Wolverhampton. I then lived in Berlin for ten years, which has the thrid highest Turkish population of any city, after Istanbul and Ankara.
And demblin, what have you actually achieved in your life - what contribution have you made? You're just a sad pathetic man whose done fuck all and has to hold onto sharing pigment with someone else who actually did something in their life.
The only thing funny about this is that this Knob thinks HE'S funny. He's an Enlightened Idiot! China, Nigeria, India, etc allow little or no immigration. They want to maintain the traditional ethnic makeup of their countries. But according to Pooboss in this video, when whites do the same thing it's BAD BAD BAD. Typical pea-brained, hypocritcal, feminised liberal bonehead.
rewboss- Your lack of criticism of the immigration policies of India, China, Nigeria etc is conspicuous by its absence. The BNP simply want an immigration policy like that of most nations. Thoughtless liberals call BNP positions "racist" and "Nazi". Are the Indians, Nigerians etc racist and Nazi too? Pre-1948 UK was overwhelmingly white. Non-whites could've been let in. Was every previous generation of Brits Nazi and racist too? The WWII generation fought the Nazis. Why would Nazis fight Nazis?
Why would I spend time criticizing the immigration policies of other countries when I am raising questions about British national identity in a 5-minute sketch? When did I suggest the BNP was Nazi? When did I suggest that pre-war Britain was Nazi or racist? Why are you focusing on black immigration when I also alluded to Polish plumbers and German composers?
rew- You think there's no such thing as true British. Go to China and explain that because China was invaded by Mongols & others at sundry points in their history there's no such thing as true Chinese. China must therefore open its borders to humanity from every corner of the globe. They'll laugh you out of the room. But why should UK accept immigrants from such a racist country that accepts no immigrants itself? Such criticism is relevant; it illustrates your close-mindedness and hypocrisy.
rewboss- I've said nothing about "black immigration." And you suggest the supporters of the BNP are thick for wanting to maintain the traditional ethnic heritage of our country. Most nations of the earth do exactly that. Why do you not take the piss out of them as well? Could it be that you hold white people to a higher standard? That sounds suspiciously racist to me, my hypocritical friend.
Actually, you did talk about black immigration, or at least non-white immigration. You refer to pre-1948 Britain being "overwhelmingly white". And again you ask if I hold "white people" to a higher standard.
I have taken the piss out of other nations. My video "What's the Middle East?" is a critique of the battle for racial purity in Israel and Palestine. I find the idea of racial purity ludicrous wherever it occurs. Our ethnic heritage has changed constantly; why stop now?
rew said "Our ethnic heritage has changed constantly." Up until 1948 it didn't. What is so hard to understand about this? The UK has been composed of Scots, Welsh, Irish, & English for centuries. Geneticists' studies conclude that influxes of Romans, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, French Huguenots, & Jews have had only minor influences on the ancient gene pool of these isles. Google "Adrian Targett", the Cheddar school teacher that gene analysis show is a direct descendant of 9000 year old Cheddar Man.
rew- Why have any immigration? Seriously! Pre-1948 UK produced the Empire, the Industrial Rev, the steam engine, railroad, & countless inventions that benefit all, the Magna Carta, modern democracy, women's rights etc. We got on very well by ourselves. The only beneficiaries are Labour (cheap votes), and unscrupulous businessmen (cheap labour). Many 3rd world immigrants have utterly backward attitudes towards women & gays, and no concept of human rights. Why in the world import such primitives?
Actually, geneticists have pretty much comprehensively established that the gene pool of these isles and many others are much more varied than you think. The account of one man able to trace his ancestry back to the stone age is balanced by the account of a red-haired green-eyed Irish boy who contracted sickle-cell anaemia. About 20% of the native English is genetically Anglo-Saxon, hardly a "minor influence". And while the Chinese were printing books, we were barely able to read.
In fact, before the Industrial Revolution, we lagged behind the rest of the world. When we fought in the Crusades, for example, the Arabs were appalled at our primitive weapons and complete lack of scientific knowledge. We did make considerable progress in the 19th century, but the 20th century belonged to America and the 21st century looks as if it is going to belong to Asia.
I dare you to have a DNA genealogy test done. Let me know the results; should be good for a laugh.
rew- More Porkies from Pooboss. Whites, often Brits, have lead the world in discoveries & inventions since time immemorial. The Han words for "wheel", "saddle", "spoke", etc come from Tocharian, the language of ancient whites of Asia anarhijaDOTlv/books/Oxford_Intro2Proto-Indo-EuropeanWorldDOTpdf
The Chinese were so advanced they didn't even have the wheel until whitey introduced it to them. Arabs nicked much maths & science from the Greeks, esp. when Muslims overran Alexandria.
The Chinese did really well without the wheel. That they didn't invent it doesn't mean they were backward. Indians invented the system of writing numbers, adopted by the Arabs, which made serious maths really possible. The Arabs inherited algebra from the Babylonians (the Greeks used geometry to solve equations). Arabian astronomy was far superior to Greek astronomy, which is why the Byzantine Empire ditched Ptolomy's tables. And so on and so forth.
rew- Non-white contributions pale in comparison to our own. But whites have also brought the world the concepts of democracy, human rights, women's rights, etc. It can be posited they are a consequence of our technological progress. But they've never arisen in E. Asia, despite their high avg IQ. For you to support the importation of backward, misogynist, anti-democratic 3rd world people into the UK is twisted. Should their cultures overtake ours wave bye bye to democracy, human & women's rights.
rew- Glad you changed the subject. Whites, often Brits, have discovered/invented electricity, the car, plane, railroad, computer, microchip, radio, TV, photography, microscope, telescope, microwave, central heating, air conditioning, refrigeration, light bulb, internet, space travel, antibiotics, pasteurisation, nuclear power, quantum physics, trigonometry, sub-atomic sciences, DNA, countless life saving medical procedures and medicines, ad infinitum. The world needs us more than the reverse.
So, your contention is that just because you can list a series of things invented or discovered by whites, whites must be superior? How about blood banks, elevators, gas masks and open-heart surgery?
rew- You initiated this "superiority" issue with your remarks about the Arabs & Chinese. The nonsense from you continues unabated. Whites like Larrey, Romero, & Dalton all operated on the heart sac before African surgeon Williams. WIlliams only worked on the heart sac, which isn't "open heart surgery". Whites Haslett, Stenhouse, and Tyndall all developed gas masks before African Morgan.
Robert Frost said "A liberal is a man who can't take his own side in an argument." That is you, Mr Own Goal.
Oh, Morgan's gas mask was enough of a technological breakthrough for it to be patented. And even if William's acheivement wasn't so much of a breakthrough, he was still a pioneer and his contributions were dramatically important.
You claim I initiated this "superiority" issue, but isn't the crux of your agument that whites invent things and non-whites don't? And if so, what is it about whites that makes them better inventors?
rew- Most significant rare non-white contributions have been made in the context of a white society. I don't have to argue for superiority. The evidence is manifest all over our cities. People can choose a neolithic life dancing about in animal skins & hunting for lunch, or a white technological society. Most pick the latter, voting with their feet. Whites have high avg IQ, but so do E Asians. Whites have more of an intangible creative streak. It may be unquantifiable but it exists nevertheless.
rew- I have had a DNA genealogy test done and it confirmed what I already knew. I'm 1/8 Irish, 7/8 English, all northern European. But you have a disconcerting, disproportionate interest in such matters rew. Are you some non-British admixture? Japan has been pressured for years to surrender to the multicult for years, yet they resist. I applaud them. It's their nation to do as they see fit. All ethnicities have a right to exist, including US.
7/8 "English"? What does that mean? Anglo-Saxon? Celtic? If Anglo-Saxon, then by your own definition you're not really British. If Celtic, how on earth did the test distinguish between the 7/8 of you that's non-Irish and the 1/8 that is Irish, seeing as the Irish are of Celtic origin? And how convenient that it's an exact 7/8-1/8 split -- almost as if instead of actually testing your DNA, they'd just asked you where your great-grandparents were born. Amazing -- I'm impressed.
rew- By US I mean true Brits. If you truly are clueless as to what I mean you can start withe "white". Every significant ethnic group to enter the UK pre 1948 was white. What is so hard understand about this? Your mission is obviously to promote the idea that there is no true Brit identity. But you hold no other racial or ethnic group to that standard, only whites. For libs it takes a lifetime to see what is right under your nose.
I apologise: I misread your post. I thought by "US" you meant "United States".
I do, however, as I have repeatedly said, hold other racial groups to the same "standards", meaning that from my reading of the evidence, racial purity is a bit of a myth everywhere. Even the oh-so-racially-pure Japanese appear to be an admixture of the Jomon and immigrants from the mainland. I've repeatedly said I don't believe in the purity of any race: why do you argue as if I'd said the opposite?
rew- Even a cursory examination of history reveals Brits established democracy, education, women's rights, law & order and civilisation wherever we went. Whom else has done that? Whether it is attributable to genetics or something else doesn't matter. We're generally fair-minded & that's being used against us in today's multicult society. Immigration insanity is an existential threat. Wipe us out & you can say hello to authoritarianism, misogyny and other dark, predominant behaviours of mankind.
Who else? Well, the Romans did a lot for education, law and order and civilisation. So did the Greeks, come to that. Women had the vote in Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Canada, and Russia before they did in the UK. Women were allowed to have a say in marriage and divorce under Islam by the 7th century. There was a university in Mali when the British were still in mud huts. Native Americans used farming techniques way in advance of Europeans' when they first arrived.
UK did more than all combined. Of course Rome & Greece did much but their democracies were brief. Islam's a religion, not an ethnicity and women could choose between the full body shroud burka or the one with the tiny eye slit. Sure, Africans were zooming to Pluto and back before evil whitey stole their intergalactic teletransporters. Yes, backward Brits never heard of farming until enlightened by Amerinds. That's why we built seaworthy craft & navigated across an ocean to them, not the reverse.
Wow. That post contains so much ignorance about other cultures and basic human history, it's hard to know where to start. Yes, Islam's a religion, but guess what? In the 7th century, Brits didn't practice Islam, and most Islamic women are not forced to wear burkas. The Brits were not first to the New World. The Roman Empire lasted 500 years. Nobody has the faintest idea how the Aborigines arrived in Australia, but they must have had ocean-going craft 50,000 or more years ago.
Of course Brits were not the first to the New World. Other non-Amerinds were. Google "Kennewick Man" and "Spirit Cave Man", skeletal remains of Caucasian (not necessarily white) non-Amerinds that are the oldest human remains found in North America. Their existence indicates they lived in NA first and were forced out by Amerinds. I never said all Islamic women are forced to wear Burkas but you're delusional if you think Muslim women have as much say over their lives as women in the west.
Thank you for making my point for me. There is NO significant history of democracy, women's rights, or human rights in the non-white world. And white technological developments dwarf all else. I'm well aware of the duration and achievements of the ancient Greeks & Romans. My point is that they were only briefly democratic. Read Roman historian Tacitus' description of contemporaneous Celt and Germanic peoples. His accounts of their group councils indicate where the roots of democracy come from.
I'm not going to bother arguing the toss with you. I've lost count, but I think this is the third or fourth time you've claimed not to have said something you clearly did say. And in terms of Totally Missing The Point, your last post really takes the biscuit. Seriously: I talk about the 7th century, and your arguing as if I'm talking about the 21st. You've set up so many straw men these past few days, you could open a scarecrow factory.
rew- No I've missed nothing. 1) The ultimate point is that UK needs no immigrants. There's nothing they do we can't do for ourselves. Labour wants them for cheap votes, unscrupulous businesses for cheap labour. THAT'S IT. You can't refute that point. 2) The UK wasn't backward in the 7th century. Brits at least 3000 years ago knew how to transport massive bluestones from Wales to what's now Stonehenge & arrange them in tune with the planets and the seasons. Hardly the work of the primitive.
3) You said there was a university in Mali while Brits were in mudhuts. Really? May I interest you in some swampland in Florida? Black Africa never even had a written language, much less a book, before the arrival of colonial powers. But perhaps my Eurocentrism blinds me. Maybe those intricate dances performed in loin cloths and grass skirts were non verbal ways of older Malians transmitting the Laws Of Thermodynamics or the Periodic Table of Elements to their young.
rew- 4) If we accept your premise that women in 7th century Islam were more enfranchised than they are now, or that Brit women were then, what the hell happened? How'd they regress? How'd we progress? Again, if you find you regress over a millenia to prove your point you've lost the argument before it's begun. I wish you well. I've enjoyed our debate. If we were in a pub I'd buy you a round, but only of the cheapest, vilest American rubbish available, like Budweiser or somesuch.
rew- Don't misunderstand. I'm telling you that I'm 1/8 Irish (my great-gran was from Galway) 7/8 English. The DNA analysis did not declare that. It did state that my genetic ancestry is clearly in NW Europe. Sorry to disappoint you but there were no Pygmy or Bantu alleles.
rewboss- You're completely wrong again. According to Oxford Archaeologist David Miles genetic studies show that Roman, Huguenot, Jewish, Angle, Saxon, Jute, and Norman genes COMBINED add up to only about 20% of British genes. 80% of today's British genes have been here for upwards of 10,000 years. newsDOTnationalgeographicDOTcom/news/2005/07/0719_050719_britishgeneDOThtml
I don't blame you for lying. That is the essence of liberalism, the nature of the beast. It's all you CAN do. Nice try.
Apples and pears. David Miles says 80% of the *British* are, well, British. I said that 20% of the *English* are Anglo-Saxon.
But such figures can be misleading. What they mean is that the majority of British citizens have mostly British DNA. But an individual person's DNA is rarely 100% British, or even 100% north European. The majority carry genetic markers from all over the place. Even if Miles considers you British for the purposes of his book, you could be 30% African for all you know.
rew- Don't obfuscate the issue with this "genetic markers" term. There is much genetic overlap amongst the races. Some "African" genes can be found in Asians & Amerinds. Humans like you share over 90% of their DNA with rats, which is why they make good lab test animals. People with a preponderance of "European" genes are European. Try foisting your fiction on Indians. Tell them there are no true Indians, & on that pretext they must surrender to the multicult. It should be worth a good laugh.
Yes, some African genes can be found in Asians and Amerinds. That's the whole point: humans travel around and intermingle a lot.
And yes, 90% of our genes are identical with those of rats, and 98% with those of orang-utans. But that's not the part of the DNA you're looking at when investigating ancestry. Ask a geneticist to explain.
You've also admitted that Europeans are people with a "preponderance" of European genes. That is, a lot of their genes come from elsewhere. Exactly my point.
And what does what Indians believe matter? If they believe themselves racially pure, they're almost certainly wrong, whether they laugh or not, considering there are something like 2,000 distinct ethnic groups represented in the Indian population.
rew- I know what parts of DNA are relevant to ancestry. I mentioned rat/human DNA similarity as an example of how you distort race/ethnicity. Of course there's considerable overlap in the human genome. But as regards the UK you imply that because there is green there can be no such thing as blue and yellow. That's nonsense. Here's a clue: if you have to cite events over a millenia old to bolster your fiction that there's no such thing as true Brit you're on the losing side of the argument.
no it isnt, no christians burn 'witches' nowadays. stop living in the past.
I bet your one of them idiots that say there has been immigration in the past so it should be accepted now. But everytime our country has been invaded by immigrants we have fought against them whether we have won or lost.
The sharia law will be made the primary law here if they continue to invade us. They are already the majority in birmingham, our 2nd biggest city.
I think you need to stop living in the past, actually. That was my point. These days, very few Muslim countries implement Sharia law in its entirety, except for regulating private matters like inheritance and marriage. Sharia law is not, and will never be, recognised in the UK, but if both parties agree, a Sharia court can serve as an arbitrator in civil legal disputes -- just like the Beth Din courts have been doing for Jews for over 100 years.
Sharia law is implemented in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, Libya, Sudan and parts of Nigeria.
And unless you are yourself a Muslim and agree with your adversary that you'd like a Sharia court to arbitrate your civil dispute, nobody can force you to submit to Sharia law in the UK. You will not have your arm chopped off, you will not be sentenced to fifty lashes, you will not have to learn Arabic.
Well a recent poll amongst the Muslim population in the UK revealed that 60% would rather live under sharia law than under british law.
Stats show that in the last 30 years, the muslim population of the UK has grown from under 100,000 to over 2 million. In other european countries these figures are higher, I guess if you are more than happy for the UK to become a majority muslim population then carry on regardless.
The figure was 40%, and was conducted around the time Muslims were getting really very irate about those cartoons of Mohammed. 41% said they completely opposed sharia law, leaving 19% who didn't really care. In the same poll, 91% of all Muslims questioned said they felt loyal to Britain.
I think you are referring to the ICM poll carried out 3 years ago. Supposed polls since show that sharia law is supported more by young muslims. Yes i have seen various polls banded around showing certain stats varying between 60% downward in support of Sharia law but in the end, what do stats mean !
What is certain is that islamification is on the increase and will surpass any other religion in years to come and Europe shows ever more increasing numbers of muslim demographics ......cont
So... in the same post, you agree that many polls show far less support for sharia law than you originally said and cite that as a reason to disregard statistics completely -- not in so many words, admittedly, but that is the implication -- but then talk about "increasing numbers of Muslim demographics". Do you not see a slight problem with your argument here?
'Many' polls well who knows if it's 'many' polls but maybe if you want to be pedantic about it then i should have said up to and quoted an asterisk with a footnote attached.
You can rely on stats as much as you like but it's down to what you want to believe.
OK, let me try again. This time, pay attention to the suggestion I am putting to you.
You say we shouldn't rely on stats, and that it's all down to "what you want to believe". Then you go on to state, quite unambiguously, that the "shift in demographics is without question", a conclusion you could only have come to by relying on statistics.
Census polls based on religion/race and are quite categorically correct as they are based on absolute numbers (eg:muslim/non muslim...with me so far ?.......whereas various polls concerning who wants sharia law etc depend on random numbers of people questioned at any given moment of time or any given place, you could possibly do the same poll in one day and get different results according to whoever is asked...the latter here is of a more variable content.
Really? What about all those thousands of people who listed their religion as "Jedi"? What about all those people who don't actually go to church/synagogue/mosque but the head of the household put them down as Christian/Jewish/Muslim anyhow? What about all those people who are ethnically not British, but were born in the UK and don't even want to set foot in their parents' country of origin?
I have a better idea. Let's examine the data -- all of it, including the data that contradict pet theories -- and attempt to identify all the strengths and weaknesses of each set before coming to a decision about how much credence to lend each piece of it.
Yeah. The Angles, the Saxons, the Jutes, the Danes, the Normans... we're all going to hell in a handcart, aren't we? We should paint ourselves blue and fight off the invaders before it's too late.
You cannot Never say 'sharia law will never be, recognised in the UK' unless you have a crystal ball, you are simply prophesising and besides, the country has british law.
...yes, British law operates in the UK, which is why I don't expect to be lopping hands off shoplifters in the near future, and why I also expect that, in the future, "it was an honour killing, m'lud" will never be a viable defence against a murder charge. It's also the reason we won't be torpedoing boats off the coast of Libya just to teach Johnny Foreigner a lesson.
Capitano- Right, mate. We Brits had no idea how to build anything until the Poles showed up last year. We stood under trees when it rained or dug a small hole in the ground.
no but you still god rediculs single glased windows wich are paintet about twenty times so that you can´t open them anymor which doesen´t matter, because the wind still pases - you got carpet in the toilet, which is disgusting. And all youre houses ar madout of extremly thin walls, so that you can hear your neigbour talking and the entire house is quacking if sommeone shots the door......
There are loonies everywhere, but at least in our countries they usually remain on the outer fringes.
It's a hot topic in the UK at the moment, because some members of all the mainstream parties have been caught fiddling their expenses, and people are worried that the extremist parties will benefit from voters' anger. European elections are happening right now, UK national elections due next year at the latest: people are getting a bit nervous.
I am THE most patritic person in Great Britain and this person is a traitorous, lisping, gay cunt.
BewareTheBeast 4 months ago
@BewareTheBeast ...says the person who chooses, to accompany a video entitled "Where have all the real Britons gone?", an Austrian Christmas carol. You couldn't make it up...
rewboss 4 months ago
@rewboss Silent Night has been sung in this country for years. The fact that it is Germanic, only makes me more proud of my British/Western european heritage. After all English IS a Germanic language.
BewareTheBeast 4 months ago
@BewareTheBeast English is also an Indo-European language, a group that includes nearly every language in Europe and several in south Asia. On the other hand, the Austrians have more in common with the Slavs than they do with the Angles and Saxons. Besides, if Silent Night has been sung in Britain for years, immigrants have been living in Britain for generations, so I'm not sure what your point is.
rewboss 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rewboss No, english is a Germanic language which is of Indo-european origin (they think). My point is, that while you have stripped the UK of all of it's culture & heritage, please allow me to use 'silent night' without critisism - you can still heap coals on your own funeral pyre after that.
BewareTheBeast 4 months ago
'Ahmed' wouldn't be a foreign name..
flosssock 6 months ago
I'd vote for you just because you pronounced 'patriotism' right.
Veron451 7 months ago 3
Hmm we in the New Hope Party do not trust you, the BPP or your supposed far-right credentials for the simple reason that you do not have a small mostache, we don't trust people who have the ability to grow a small mostache and don't!
TheNewHopeParty 9 months ago
You do realise Othello is fictional?
MrJST87 10 months ago
@MrJST87 Yes. But proof positive that the idea of a black army general was not outlandish to Shakespeare's contemporaries.
rewboss 10 months ago
Hilarious, A+!
Und jetzt bitte noch so eins für die NPD!
sorak0 10 months ago
This is ABSOLUTELY hilarious!!!! This is seriously funny.
flowersusername 1 year ago
your making the white race look like a bunch of cunts, you do realise tht dnt ya. your making a mocary out of england. this is serious read mein kampf, freedom and reality by enoch powell then use the balls between your legs and beat some darkys its people like you that destroyed C18 and white wolfs and give a bad name the the rest of us
1488
fawcett94102 1 year ago
@fawcett94102 No, I'm making a mockery of white supremacists like you, who don't actually speak for "the white race", whatever that might be. But you're not helping your own case: perhaps if you learnt to spell and punctuate correctly, you might make yourself look a bit less stupid.
But thank you. I now don't need to make any more videos of this type. All I have to do is copy and paste your comment, and let you make a mockery of yourself.
rewboss 1 year ago
@rewboss oww dear 1 thing "you might make yourself look a bit less stupid."
coming from the man with a pony tail sitting at his computer talking to him self
fawcett94102 1 year ago
@fawcett94102 No, talking to the camera. Like newsreaders, reporters, and politicians.
rewboss 1 year ago
@fawcett94102
who are the "darkys"?
flowersusername 1 year ago
insect.
Iron1023 1 year ago
was this ment to be funny? :|
BlameItOnTheKeyboard 1 year ago
Is this supposed to be funny?
reokdsp 1 year ago
LOL
samwisegamgeese 1 year ago
TWAT.
deno914 1 year ago
mate you're just sat behind your computer. Just because you're pretending to wear a shirt and tie doesn't mean thats what we see.
And your acting is worse than Gordon Browns.
Get back to reality and vote BNP.
PanAxiom 1 year ago
@PanAxiom And this is how you get people to join your cause, is it? Tell them they can't act?
rewboss 1 year ago
@rewboss
Taking shots at the BNP in the style of a 1970's skinhead nazi merely highlights your lack of understanding. Granted there was a time when the stereotype you portray was singular in class and isolate in cause. Blame the far left elite for the fact that these days it's not the case.
Sorry about the acting comment.
PanAxiom 1 year ago
@PanAxiom
There are no far left elite in Britain. Labour are centre right now, the tories always were centre right and the lib dems vaguely in the middle. The CPGB etc. have no power whatsoever, so what 'far left elite' are you talking about?
ourhandsaretied 1 year ago
@PanAxiom Still, the acting isn't as bad as Mr Griffin's.
Lanko182 1 year ago
Why can't we enslave the scots? I mean really, if there was ever an ignorant, unintelligible population...plus, they'd fight all the other foreigners for every pence!
cerealthrilla 1 year ago
@cerealthrilla "Ignorant and unintelligible"? This from somebody who doesn't know to capitalise the word "Scot" and doesn't understand the distinction between "penny", "pennies" and "pence"?
rewboss 1 year ago
I'd vote for them :P
lol good vid
jaw1024 1 year ago
not quite sure if you're being sarcastic or not as i haven't had the energy to fully watch the video or read your comments,
but, you certainly look like a grubby foreigner
Posthuman7 1 year ago
Well, I am a foreigner. British, born and, as far as I can trace my family tree, bred; but a foreigner nevertheless.
rewboss 1 year ago
Nonsense.
BritonAgainstIslam 2 years ago
ohh i love satire
AnAnAs621 2 years ago
Anyway, you may sit there and attempt to make a witty little video all about a political party's policies but let me ask you, are you quite happy to see uncontrolled immigration continue for many years to come despite what it may cause? Do you think we should just ignore the rumblings underneath the surface of many people who live on this island who do not vote BNP yet feel fed up at what they see as cultural eradification ?
You seem to like poking fun yet are very short on an alternative view
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
You're asking loaded questions. Immigration is not uncontrolled. There are problems and people are worried about them, but very few of them see the BNP or even UKIP as a viable alternative. Your own answers make no sense: you say the BNP doesn't advocate forced repatriation, but many immigrants will risk their lives to come to the UK, so how do you make them want to leave if you don't use force? And: "You believe everything you see on TV"? You mean the BNP lie in interviews?
rewboss 2 years ago
I am asking YOU questions and you have put yourself in the firing line as it were yet you seem stuck on hard answers.
Immigration is NOT controlled, there are no limits to the amount of asylum seekers we let in, as long as they come across bonafide and if they can 'prove' in their own country they are persecuted we let them in, it's been government policy for years! Why do you think they manage to cross many borders in order to get here...because we are a soft touch, always have been.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
No it doesn't as far as law abiding people who have come here go, they will deport ther illegal asylum seekers, people who should not be here in the first place aswell as the ones who come to this country and commit crimes but there is not a policy of enforced resettlement of anyone else, it's quite clear on their website as a statement of policy.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
'But many immigrants will risk their lives to come to the UK'....and ?...is that our problem?...they simply choose the UK simply as to what i have said before, it's a well known fact they know they can settle here so much easier than any other country on the planet!
Why should we have to be the worlds 'dustbin' for refugees ?
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
The US, Canada and France are three countries that take on more immigrants than the UK. We send back illegal immigrants all the time. 30,000 non-asylum seekers were refused entry last year. And 70% of asylum seekers -- about 13,000 -- had their applications refused. The total number of people deported in 2008 was 7% up on 2007. I could go on, but I think you get the general idea.
rewboss 2 years ago
Canada's immigration is based on per head of population whereas France appearing not to have that much info on immigrations stats have curbed immigration in this part of the century so not sure where you get that one from!
We have had a news story here predicting that the population will rise by 10 miilion in the next 20 years with 66% of that being from immigration from outside countries, At my reckoning that could mean we expand at the rate of almost 300,000 immigrants per year up until 2029
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
We have had in place a system of allowing immigrants to settle here for years and years, well that's fine i have no problem with that but the numbers have swelled so dramatically particularly from the religion of Islam and it's not just here, it's Europewide that many people are now witnessing a bloodless coup if you like, this isn't some kind of lie, it's fact and it's so stark staringly obvious that it begs belief how ignorant some people are of what's going on outside of their doors.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
In case you're referring to that video about how Islam is poised to sweep across Europe, almost all the figures in that video are either made up or distorted beyond measure.
rewboss 2 years ago
I can accept the figures are debatable but only a fool can't see that by and large 'that video' and it's underlying message is true regarding the colonisation of Islam into western Europe. We can debate figures till we are both blue in the face but it is without question that the demographical swell of Islam is significantly on the increase so your assumption appears wildly misjudged
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
The demographical swell of Islam is *not* significantly on the increase in Europe. The video is an outright lie. Fertility rates among whites is increasing, not decreasing. Fertility rates among Muslims is not any higher -- do you know any Muslim families with 8 children? No European official is predicting the islamification of Europe, and many of them are very upset at being misquoted in that film. Immigration levels are nowhere near what the film claims.
rewboss 2 years ago
Rew, which planet do you live on and i am getting the feeling if i say black, you'll say white and vice-versa. I am really not sure what to say to you anymore as you clearly are not living on planet earth, have your eyes shut or well...i simply don't understand your logic.
Islam extolls the virtue of large families and thankfully my eyes are wide open in what i see in everyday life on 'British' streets along with many others. Foresight believe me is a virtue and it's a shame you don't....CONT
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
CONT ...appear to have any of that in abundance or can be open minded enough with your own eyes but mind you, living in a wonderful town like Glastonbury isn't exactly exposed to the swell of Islam so one could forgive you for that.
The film in all honesty isn't the issue here and it's a shame it seems to be the crux of the matter regarding this subject but it's 100% certain that Islam is on the rise at significant rates but i don't expect you to ever acknowledge that.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
If you were paying attention, you'd know that I don't live in Glastonbury -- that's just where I was born. I have in my time lived in Wolverhampton and in Berlin, both cities of relatively high Muslim populations. I've been around, I've seen a lot.
You seem to think that Muslim families are large because you've heard that Islam encourages large families. I ask you again: Do you know any Muslim families with 8 children?
rewboss 2 years ago
Rew, why don't you try being less
arrogant in your replies ?
'I've been around, I've seen alot'...seems those comments purvey a sense of moral highground over anyone else's views you simply don't agree with, i've personally never felt i've had to advertise my crudentials to anyone.
It's not that i have heard Rew about how islamic families like to have large families, it's that i have seen and experienced it in it's reality, add to that it's encouraged through the teachings of Islam.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
Oh and i have not answered your last point about do I know any muslim families with 8 children, nope afraid i don't but then i wasn't the one harping on about specific figures, i refer you to that video you mentioned......do pay attention Rew
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
Specific figures are the point. Specific figures make or break your argument, and specific figures directly contradict your view that Europe is about to be islamified.
You accused me of not having any experience of the real world, hence my comment that I have actually.
So what is your experience with large Muslim families, then? I'm not asking what you've heard about Islamic teaching (many Christian denominations also encourage large families), but what your actual experience is.
rewboss 2 years ago
Rew, you seem to like twisting peoples comments on here and again, you continue to misquote or misinterpret me and this is frankly getting nowhere. You aren't after discussion or debate, you merely answer questions with another question which is clearly not advancing the subject matter, Youtube is hard enough but dealing with your intransigence leaves me just scratching my head in bewilderment.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
Pardon me, but your last question was whether I was happy living in a society with uncontrolled immigration. My answer was that immigration isn't out of control. You countered that by saying, in effect, that it's common knowledge that Muslims have large families, and you claim to be able to back that up with personal evidence. I have asked you several times now to provide that evidence, but you refuse.
rewboss 2 years ago
Regarding the statistics you posted yesterday about immigration rates, the ONS's actual figures estimate that 45% (not, as you claim, 66%) of the increase will come from immigration. However, the figures are based on data available up to mid 2008, and since then net migration has slowed by 44% and government policies on immigration have tightened. The ONS's figures are already down on similar estimates made earlier, and may have to be revised downwards again.
rewboss 2 years ago
It would not cost much to repatriate them, in fact it would be cost effective as they could be sent back with the Benefit money lots of them recieve .If it was done in stages there would be no shortage of medical staff,ie for every British person that qualifies it would be possible to send one back to their country of origin until we have the health service fully manned up by British people and being paid the correct wages for the job.Which would also reduce illness in their own countries
JINNERMAC 2 years ago
The BNP manifesto claims the BNP will not force anyone to leave against their will, but will offer cash incentives to encourage them to leave. How much do you think you would need to pay a nurse to persuade her to go back to Zimbabwe right now? What will you do if they simply refuse to leave? If you forcibly repatriate them, how will you cope when other countries start forcibly repatriating millions of people like me back to the UK?
rewboss 2 years ago
You are hypothesizing, no one in the BNP is advocating 'forced repatriation' so lets get that one straight.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
Well congratulations,you achieved what ya set out to do.Now go home and read the BNP manifesto,ya just might learn something or better still go live in an inner city multi cultural shit hole and se how British peolple are treat like shit
JINNERMAC 2 years ago
Well, the BNP manifesto doesn't even make sense -- for a start, how much do you suppose it's going to cost the British economy to "repatriate" everyone, and once that's done, how long before we can have fully staffed hospitals again? -- and I spent three years in Wolverhampton being treated conspicuously unlike shit.
Next question?
rewboss 2 years ago
You are missing one fundemental point here, every political party up until a general election has a murky kind of manifesto and if you have problems regarding the cost of what the BNP proposes why don't you ask them directly regarding this issue?
As for 'fully staffed hospitals', i think we have enough lazy scroungers in this country who need a kick up their arse into work rather than pander to their every whim in this socially kind society we have created for ourselves...oh and them.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
I don't need to ask them directly about it: that's what TV interviews are for. And what they say in TV interviews is things like Jinnermac's answer to my question. Of course, if you want to try to staff our hospitals with "lazy scroungers", you'll just end up with hospitals staffed with unqualified lazy scroungers. I don't see how that's going to improve the quality of health care. Make them pick up litter if you must, but I won't have them giving me injections, thank you.
rewboss 2 years ago
Oh so you believe everything you see on tv then? Isn't that a little naive ?
Maybe Jinnermac's point about the huge cost of benefits this country pays out can maybe given some creedence as to where the money wil come from but let's face it, none of us can say where they will raise the money from as that has not been put to the BNP so my original question still stands unanswered.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
This bloke is a fucking arsehole
JINNERMAC 2 years ago 3
Yes, that was the impression I was trying to convey.
rewboss 2 years ago
Nicely done my man, Nicely done!
Peace!
kevinmc1 2 years ago
this is clearly a parody. people should relax. major LOLz.!
chillipeanuts 2 years ago
I'm guessing this is a pisstake just a shame we have a load of rasist twats commenting. The reason people vote for BNP is the same reason people vote for Hitler because they were stupid uninformed idiots who noded along and folloewed like sheep while everyone else talked bollocks also there was a econmic crisis (same a now) so to sum BNP Voters = Massive Stupid Twats.
Englandrules25 2 years ago
britan has let too many shithead dirty smelly foreigners settle here now we have to put up with the shite
i feel like lamping an asian
TheCasao86 2 years ago
Vote Labour child murderers!
JustProud1 2 years ago
JOIN THE QUEST TO STOP FASCISIM
subscribe or become a friend of the anti-BNP channel
In WWII brave men fought and died on foreign soil for us and our country, against Nazism.
how can the 6% who voted for their party live with that? join this group and prove you care!
StopTheFascistBMP 2 years ago
Hmmm what was it that Winston Churchill said about fascists...i think it were along the lines of 'the real fascists are the anti fascists' ?
I can more than live with the fact i actually felt so proud and motivated to vote this time around for something i truly believe in.
Maybe you should ask yourself WHY almost a million people voted BNP at the euro elections ?....There is alot of disquiet about about how the left have made the UK into some cultural melting pot with no mandate.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
and why do u have to go to racist levels...?
seriously leave the country if u dont like it, or stfu...
OfficialProBrawler 2 years ago
Comment removed
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
yu thick basterd go and put yur leg down and say enuff to a foreignor yud get banged the fuck out yu fuckin racist for eyes basterd go and suck yur mom YOUR A JOKE MATE!
iceadil0121 2 years ago
This is bloody hilarious. Well done for showing how stupid all these racist morons are.
lutonboiuk 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In a recent Government survey in Sweden it was found just over 10% of Swedish women aged 18 to 50 had been seriously sexually assaulted or raped by a muslim in the last twelve months.
Large parts of Southern Sweden are now no go areas for Swedish People and Police!
cigpapers 2 years ago
MATE YOUR A CUNT
britainnotasia 2 years ago
It's easy to criticise the idea of re-introducing slavery for non whites as racist , but when all these politically correct people get offered a free slave I bet they say yes!
cigpapers 2 years ago
I'd vote for this fellow before the clowns we have at the moment!
cigpapers 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
haha british ppl are genetically recessive anyway. u cancerour whities will be gone by theend of the century, thank god
Title: Whites Have More "Harmful" Variations.
SOURCE: Nature International Weekly Journal of Science
DATE: December 2007
Website: htt p : / /ww w . nature . com/nature/journal/v451/n7181/ full / nature06611 . html
mikejak23 2 years ago
hilarious video!
nobcheesy 2 years ago
i dont care i still dont want them twats on my streets, they have made no effort to intergrate with us and they are racist back to us mainly in there own language because there cowards. and yes i understand some urdu so i know when they are saying it.
and i dont fink u hav ne write 2 say nething if u have been living in berlin for the last 10 years since u dont have a clue whats really going on and only what the media portrays.
stuckinmiddleearth 2 years ago
They're racist "back" to you? That implies you were racist to them first, does it not?
And how is my living for ten years among one of the largest Muslim populations in Central Europe not relevant? Your point was about Muslims in general: now it appears you're talking about only Muslims in England. Does this mean that there's something about England that makes Muslims go bad?
rewboss 2 years ago
i was not implying i am racist to them, but i can be sitting on the bus and here them talking about white people and sometimes me personally.
germany can do what they want im trying to save england.
stuckinmiddleearth 2 years ago
Well, on the evidence of this little exchange, it would seem that your Urdu is actually better than your English. I'm impressed.
rewboss 2 years ago
do u even live in the uk?
stuckinmiddleearth 2 years ago
I lived there for 21 of the first 23 years of my life, three of them in Wolverhampton. I then lived in Berlin for ten years, which has the thrid highest Turkish population of any city, after Istanbul and Ankara.
rewboss 2 years ago
very mature
stuckinmiddleearth 2 years ago
Albert Einstein: "We owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to count, without which no worthwhile scientific discovery could have been made."
Damien558 2 years ago
And demblin, what have you actually achieved in your life - what contribution have you made? You're just a sad pathetic man whose done fuck all and has to hold onto sharing pigment with someone else who actually did something in their life.
Damien558 2 years ago
And if you want to get into racist studies - even the bell curve shows Asians as superior in intelligence to Europeans.
Damien558 2 years ago
The only thing funny about this is that this Knob thinks HE'S funny. He's an Enlightened Idiot! China, Nigeria, India, etc allow little or no immigration. They want to maintain the traditional ethnic makeup of their countries. But according to Pooboss in this video, when whites do the same thing it's BAD BAD BAD. Typical pea-brained, hypocritcal, feminised liberal bonehead.
demblin 2 years ago
Would you like to remind me where in this video I said that Chinese, Nigerian and Indian immigration policies were laudable?
rewboss 2 years ago
rewboss- Your lack of criticism of the immigration policies of India, China, Nigeria etc is conspicuous by its absence. The BNP simply want an immigration policy like that of most nations. Thoughtless liberals call BNP positions "racist" and "Nazi". Are the Indians, Nigerians etc racist and Nazi too? Pre-1948 UK was overwhelmingly white. Non-whites could've been let in. Was every previous generation of Brits Nazi and racist too? The WWII generation fought the Nazis. Why would Nazis fight Nazis?
demblin 2 years ago
Why would I spend time criticizing the immigration policies of other countries when I am raising questions about British national identity in a 5-minute sketch? When did I suggest the BNP was Nazi? When did I suggest that pre-war Britain was Nazi or racist? Why are you focusing on black immigration when I also alluded to Polish plumbers and German composers?
rewboss 2 years ago
rew- You think there's no such thing as true British. Go to China and explain that because China was invaded by Mongols & others at sundry points in their history there's no such thing as true Chinese. China must therefore open its borders to humanity from every corner of the globe. They'll laugh you out of the room. But why should UK accept immigrants from such a racist country that accepts no immigrants itself? Such criticism is relevant; it illustrates your close-mindedness and hypocrisy.
demblin 2 years ago
rewboss- I've said nothing about "black immigration." And you suggest the supporters of the BNP are thick for wanting to maintain the traditional ethnic heritage of our country. Most nations of the earth do exactly that. Why do you not take the piss out of them as well? Could it be that you hold white people to a higher standard? That sounds suspiciously racist to me, my hypocritical friend.
demblin 2 years ago
Actually, you did talk about black immigration, or at least non-white immigration. You refer to pre-1948 Britain being "overwhelmingly white". And again you ask if I hold "white people" to a higher standard.
I have taken the piss out of other nations. My video "What's the Middle East?" is a critique of the battle for racial purity in Israel and Palestine. I find the idea of racial purity ludicrous wherever it occurs. Our ethnic heritage has changed constantly; why stop now?
rewboss 2 years ago
you mai don´t beliv it, as you mai comme from a city but black people make just one percent of people in GB
CapitanoGUC 2 years ago
rew said "Our ethnic heritage has changed constantly." Up until 1948 it didn't. What is so hard to understand about this? The UK has been composed of Scots, Welsh, Irish, & English for centuries. Geneticists' studies conclude that influxes of Romans, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, French Huguenots, & Jews have had only minor influences on the ancient gene pool of these isles. Google "Adrian Targett", the Cheddar school teacher that gene analysis show is a direct descendant of 9000 year old Cheddar Man.
demblin 2 years ago
rew- Why have any immigration? Seriously! Pre-1948 UK produced the Empire, the Industrial Rev, the steam engine, railroad, & countless inventions that benefit all, the Magna Carta, modern democracy, women's rights etc. We got on very well by ourselves. The only beneficiaries are Labour (cheap votes), and unscrupulous businessmen (cheap labour). Many 3rd world immigrants have utterly backward attitudes towards women & gays, and no concept of human rights. Why in the world import such primitives?
demblin 2 years ago
Actually, geneticists have pretty much comprehensively established that the gene pool of these isles and many others are much more varied than you think. The account of one man able to trace his ancestry back to the stone age is balanced by the account of a red-haired green-eyed Irish boy who contracted sickle-cell anaemia. About 20% of the native English is genetically Anglo-Saxon, hardly a "minor influence". And while the Chinese were printing books, we were barely able to read.
rewboss 2 years ago
In fact, before the Industrial Revolution, we lagged behind the rest of the world. When we fought in the Crusades, for example, the Arabs were appalled at our primitive weapons and complete lack of scientific knowledge. We did make considerable progress in the 19th century, but the 20th century belonged to America and the 21st century looks as if it is going to belong to Asia.
I dare you to have a DNA genealogy test done. Let me know the results; should be good for a laugh.
rewboss 2 years ago
rew- More Porkies from Pooboss. Whites, often Brits, have lead the world in discoveries & inventions since time immemorial. The Han words for "wheel", "saddle", "spoke", etc come from Tocharian, the language of ancient whites of Asia anarhijaDOTlv/books/Oxford_Intro2Proto-Indo-EuropeanWorldDOTpdf
The Chinese were so advanced they didn't even have the wheel until whitey introduced it to them. Arabs nicked much maths & science from the Greeks, esp. when Muslims overran Alexandria.
demblin 2 years ago
The Chinese did really well without the wheel. That they didn't invent it doesn't mean they were backward. Indians invented the system of writing numbers, adopted by the Arabs, which made serious maths really possible. The Arabs inherited algebra from the Babylonians (the Greeks used geometry to solve equations). Arabian astronomy was far superior to Greek astronomy, which is why the Byzantine Empire ditched Ptolomy's tables. And so on and so forth.
rewboss 2 years ago
rew- Non-white contributions pale in comparison to our own. But whites have also brought the world the concepts of democracy, human rights, women's rights, etc. It can be posited they are a consequence of our technological progress. But they've never arisen in E. Asia, despite their high avg IQ. For you to support the importation of backward, misogynist, anti-democratic 3rd world people into the UK is twisted. Should their cultures overtake ours wave bye bye to democracy, human & women's rights.
demblin 2 years ago
rew- Glad you changed the subject. Whites, often Brits, have discovered/invented electricity, the car, plane, railroad, computer, microchip, radio, TV, photography, microscope, telescope, microwave, central heating, air conditioning, refrigeration, light bulb, internet, space travel, antibiotics, pasteurisation, nuclear power, quantum physics, trigonometry, sub-atomic sciences, DNA, countless life saving medical procedures and medicines, ad infinitum. The world needs us more than the reverse.
demblin 2 years ago
So, your contention is that just because you can list a series of things invented or discovered by whites, whites must be superior? How about blood banks, elevators, gas masks and open-heart surgery?
rewboss 2 years ago
rew- You initiated this "superiority" issue with your remarks about the Arabs & Chinese. The nonsense from you continues unabated. Whites like Larrey, Romero, & Dalton all operated on the heart sac before African surgeon Williams. WIlliams only worked on the heart sac, which isn't "open heart surgery". Whites Haslett, Stenhouse, and Tyndall all developed gas masks before African Morgan.
Robert Frost said "A liberal is a man who can't take his own side in an argument." That is you, Mr Own Goal.
demblin 2 years ago
Oh, Morgan's gas mask was enough of a technological breakthrough for it to be patented. And even if William's acheivement wasn't so much of a breakthrough, he was still a pioneer and his contributions were dramatically important.
You claim I initiated this "superiority" issue, but isn't the crux of your agument that whites invent things and non-whites don't? And if so, what is it about whites that makes them better inventors?
rewboss 2 years ago
rew- Most significant rare non-white contributions have been made in the context of a white society. I don't have to argue for superiority. The evidence is manifest all over our cities. People can choose a neolithic life dancing about in animal skins & hunting for lunch, or a white technological society. Most pick the latter, voting with their feet. Whites have high avg IQ, but so do E Asians. Whites have more of an intangible creative streak. It may be unquantifiable but it exists nevertheless.
demblin 2 years ago
rew- I have had a DNA genealogy test done and it confirmed what I already knew. I'm 1/8 Irish, 7/8 English, all northern European. But you have a disconcerting, disproportionate interest in such matters rew. Are you some non-British admixture? Japan has been pressured for years to surrender to the multicult for years, yet they resist. I applaud them. It's their nation to do as they see fit. All ethnicities have a right to exist, including US.
demblin 2 years ago
7/8 "English"? What does that mean? Anglo-Saxon? Celtic? If Anglo-Saxon, then by your own definition you're not really British. If Celtic, how on earth did the test distinguish between the 7/8 of you that's non-Irish and the 1/8 that is Irish, seeing as the Irish are of Celtic origin? And how convenient that it's an exact 7/8-1/8 split -- almost as if instead of actually testing your DNA, they'd just asked you where your great-grandparents were born. Amazing -- I'm impressed.
rewboss 2 years ago
Also, I'd be extremely interested to hear what you think the "US ethnicity" is.
rewboss 2 years ago
rew- By US I mean true Brits. If you truly are clueless as to what I mean you can start withe "white". Every significant ethnic group to enter the UK pre 1948 was white. What is so hard understand about this? Your mission is obviously to promote the idea that there is no true Brit identity. But you hold no other racial or ethnic group to that standard, only whites. For libs it takes a lifetime to see what is right under your nose.
demblin 2 years ago
I apologise: I misread your post. I thought by "US" you meant "United States".
I do, however, as I have repeatedly said, hold other racial groups to the same "standards", meaning that from my reading of the evidence, racial purity is a bit of a myth everywhere. Even the oh-so-racially-pure Japanese appear to be an admixture of the Jomon and immigrants from the mainland. I've repeatedly said I don't believe in the purity of any race: why do you argue as if I'd said the opposite?
rewboss 2 years ago
rew- Even a cursory examination of history reveals Brits established democracy, education, women's rights, law & order and civilisation wherever we went. Whom else has done that? Whether it is attributable to genetics or something else doesn't matter. We're generally fair-minded & that's being used against us in today's multicult society. Immigration insanity is an existential threat. Wipe us out & you can say hello to authoritarianism, misogyny and other dark, predominant behaviours of mankind.
demblin 2 years ago
Who else? Well, the Romans did a lot for education, law and order and civilisation. So did the Greeks, come to that. Women had the vote in Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Canada, and Russia before they did in the UK. Women were allowed to have a say in marriage and divorce under Islam by the 7th century. There was a university in Mali when the British were still in mud huts. Native Americans used farming techniques way in advance of Europeans' when they first arrived.
rewboss 2 years ago
UK did more than all combined. Of course Rome & Greece did much but their democracies were brief. Islam's a religion, not an ethnicity and women could choose between the full body shroud burka or the one with the tiny eye slit. Sure, Africans were zooming to Pluto and back before evil whitey stole their intergalactic teletransporters. Yes, backward Brits never heard of farming until enlightened by Amerinds. That's why we built seaworthy craft & navigated across an ocean to them, not the reverse.
demblin 2 years ago
Wow. That post contains so much ignorance about other cultures and basic human history, it's hard to know where to start. Yes, Islam's a religion, but guess what? In the 7th century, Brits didn't practice Islam, and most Islamic women are not forced to wear burkas. The Brits were not first to the New World. The Roman Empire lasted 500 years. Nobody has the faintest idea how the Aborigines arrived in Australia, but they must have had ocean-going craft 50,000 or more years ago.
rewboss 2 years ago
Of course Brits were not the first to the New World. Other non-Amerinds were. Google "Kennewick Man" and "Spirit Cave Man", skeletal remains of Caucasian (not necessarily white) non-Amerinds that are the oldest human remains found in North America. Their existence indicates they lived in NA first and were forced out by Amerinds. I never said all Islamic women are forced to wear Burkas but you're delusional if you think Muslim women have as much say over their lives as women in the west.
demblin 2 years ago
Thank you for making my point for me. There is NO significant history of democracy, women's rights, or human rights in the non-white world. And white technological developments dwarf all else. I'm well aware of the duration and achievements of the ancient Greeks & Romans. My point is that they were only briefly democratic. Read Roman historian Tacitus' description of contemporaneous Celt and Germanic peoples. His accounts of their group councils indicate where the roots of democracy come from.
demblin 2 years ago
*headdesk*
I'm not going to bother arguing the toss with you. I've lost count, but I think this is the third or fourth time you've claimed not to have said something you clearly did say. And in terms of Totally Missing The Point, your last post really takes the biscuit. Seriously: I talk about the 7th century, and your arguing as if I'm talking about the 21st. You've set up so many straw men these past few days, you could open a scarecrow factory.
rewboss 2 years ago
rew- No I've missed nothing. 1) The ultimate point is that UK needs no immigrants. There's nothing they do we can't do for ourselves. Labour wants them for cheap votes, unscrupulous businesses for cheap labour. THAT'S IT. You can't refute that point. 2) The UK wasn't backward in the 7th century. Brits at least 3000 years ago knew how to transport massive bluestones from Wales to what's now Stonehenge & arrange them in tune with the planets and the seasons. Hardly the work of the primitive.
demblin 2 years ago
3) You said there was a university in Mali while Brits were in mudhuts. Really? May I interest you in some swampland in Florida? Black Africa never even had a written language, much less a book, before the arrival of colonial powers. But perhaps my Eurocentrism blinds me. Maybe those intricate dances performed in loin cloths and grass skirts were non verbal ways of older Malians transmitting the Laws Of Thermodynamics or the Periodic Table of Elements to their young.
demblin 2 years ago
rew- 4) If we accept your premise that women in 7th century Islam were more enfranchised than they are now, or that Brit women were then, what the hell happened? How'd they regress? How'd we progress? Again, if you find you regress over a millenia to prove your point you've lost the argument before it's begun. I wish you well. I've enjoyed our debate. If we were in a pub I'd buy you a round, but only of the cheapest, vilest American rubbish available, like Budweiser or somesuch.
demblin 2 years ago
rew- Don't misunderstand. I'm telling you that I'm 1/8 Irish (my great-gran was from Galway) 7/8 English. The DNA analysis did not declare that. It did state that my genetic ancestry is clearly in NW Europe. Sorry to disappoint you but there were no Pygmy or Bantu alleles.
demblin 2 years ago
rewboss- You're completely wrong again. According to Oxford Archaeologist David Miles genetic studies show that Roman, Huguenot, Jewish, Angle, Saxon, Jute, and Norman genes COMBINED add up to only about 20% of British genes. 80% of today's British genes have been here for upwards of 10,000 years. newsDOTnationalgeographicDOTcom/news/2005/07/0719_050719_britishgeneDOThtml
I don't blame you for lying. That is the essence of liberalism, the nature of the beast. It's all you CAN do. Nice try.
demblin 2 years ago
Apples and pears. David Miles says 80% of the *British* are, well, British. I said that 20% of the *English* are Anglo-Saxon.
But such figures can be misleading. What they mean is that the majority of British citizens have mostly British DNA. But an individual person's DNA is rarely 100% British, or even 100% north European. The majority carry genetic markers from all over the place. Even if Miles considers you British for the purposes of his book, you could be 30% African for all you know.
rewboss 2 years ago
rew- Don't obfuscate the issue with this "genetic markers" term. There is much genetic overlap amongst the races. Some "African" genes can be found in Asians & Amerinds. Humans like you share over 90% of their DNA with rats, which is why they make good lab test animals. People with a preponderance of "European" genes are European. Try foisting your fiction on Indians. Tell them there are no true Indians, & on that pretext they must surrender to the multicult. It should be worth a good laugh.
demblin 2 years ago
Yes, some African genes can be found in Asians and Amerinds. That's the whole point: humans travel around and intermingle a lot.
And yes, 90% of our genes are identical with those of rats, and 98% with those of orang-utans. But that's not the part of the DNA you're looking at when investigating ancestry. Ask a geneticist to explain.
You've also admitted that Europeans are people with a "preponderance" of European genes. That is, a lot of their genes come from elsewhere. Exactly my point.
rewboss 2 years ago
And what does what Indians believe matter? If they believe themselves racially pure, they're almost certainly wrong, whether they laugh or not, considering there are something like 2,000 distinct ethnic groups represented in the Indian population.
rewboss 2 years ago
rew- I know what parts of DNA are relevant to ancestry. I mentioned rat/human DNA similarity as an example of how you distort race/ethnicity. Of course there's considerable overlap in the human genome. But as regards the UK you imply that because there is green there can be no such thing as blue and yellow. That's nonsense. Here's a clue: if you have to cite events over a millenia old to bolster your fiction that there's no such thing as true Brit you're on the losing side of the argument.
demblin 2 years ago
demblin: 'Humans like you share over 90% of their DNA with rats, which is why they make good lab test animals.'
Another low life nazi piece of shit and his nonsensical whites did everything bullshit.
Cunts like you are so sad you still have to hang onto pathetic theories about europeans invading Asia and being responsible for all invention.
Indians gave Europe maths and the zero while they were living in the dark ages thinking it was the work of the devil.
Damien558 2 years ago
u obviously know nothing about the evils of islam i.e. the shariah law.
stuckinmiddleearth 2 years ago
You obviously know nothing about the other sects of Islam that don't believe in Sharia law.
rewboss 2 years ago
its THE islamic religious law, ur not much of a muslim if u dont follow it, and most muslims in this country want it put in place in the uk
stuckinmiddleearth 2 years ago
That's like saying you're not much of a Christian if you don't burn witches.
rewboss 2 years ago
no it isnt, no christians burn 'witches' nowadays. stop living in the past.
I bet your one of them idiots that say there has been immigration in the past so it should be accepted now. But everytime our country has been invaded by immigrants we have fought against them whether we have won or lost.
The sharia law will be made the primary law here if they continue to invade us. They are already the majority in birmingham, our 2nd biggest city.
stuckinmiddleearth 2 years ago
I think you need to stop living in the past, actually. That was my point. These days, very few Muslim countries implement Sharia law in its entirety, except for regulating private matters like inheritance and marriage. Sharia law is not, and will never be, recognised in the UK, but if both parties agree, a Sharia court can serve as an arbitrator in civil legal disputes -- just like the Beth Din courts have been doing for Jews for over 100 years.
rewboss 2 years ago
of couse it is, its stil recognised in most middle eastern countries. and i dont want a fucking paki court in england thats y i vote for the bnp
stuckinmiddleearth 2 years ago
Oh good grief.
Sharia law is implemented in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, Libya, Sudan and parts of Nigeria.
And unless you are yourself a Muslim and agree with your adversary that you'd like a Sharia court to arbitrate your civil dispute, nobody can force you to submit to Sharia law in the UK. You will not have your arm chopped off, you will not be sentenced to fifty lashes, you will not have to learn Arabic.
rewboss 2 years ago
Well a recent poll amongst the Muslim population in the UK revealed that 60% would rather live under sharia law than under british law.
Stats show that in the last 30 years, the muslim population of the UK has grown from under 100,000 to over 2 million. In other european countries these figures are higher, I guess if you are more than happy for the UK to become a majority muslim population then carry on regardless.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
The figure was 40%, and was conducted around the time Muslims were getting really very irate about those cartoons of Mohammed. 41% said they completely opposed sharia law, leaving 19% who didn't really care. In the same poll, 91% of all Muslims questioned said they felt loyal to Britain.
Not that polls are even remotely reliable.
rewboss 2 years ago
I think you are referring to the ICM poll carried out 3 years ago. Supposed polls since show that sharia law is supported more by young muslims. Yes i have seen various polls banded around showing certain stats varying between 60% downward in support of Sharia law but in the end, what do stats mean !
What is certain is that islamification is on the increase and will surpass any other religion in years to come and Europe shows ever more increasing numbers of muslim demographics ......cont
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
cont......so i guess we are faced with a choice of hard politics or a carry on of present immigration policies. Purely depends on your point of view.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
So... in the same post, you agree that many polls show far less support for sharia law than you originally said and cite that as a reason to disregard statistics completely -- not in so many words, admittedly, but that is the implication -- but then talk about "increasing numbers of Muslim demographics". Do you not see a slight problem with your argument here?
rewboss 2 years ago
'Many' polls well who knows if it's 'many' polls but maybe if you want to be pedantic about it then i should have said up to and quoted an asterisk with a footnote attached.
You can rely on stats as much as you like but it's down to what you want to believe.
The Shift in demographics is without question.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
OK, let me try again. This time, pay attention to the suggestion I am putting to you.
You say we shouldn't rely on stats, and that it's all down to "what you want to believe". Then you go on to state, quite unambiguously, that the "shift in demographics is without question", a conclusion you could only have come to by relying on statistics.
How are you not contradicting yourself?
rewboss 2 years ago
It's very easy, just read what i say,
Census polls based on religion/race and are quite categorically correct as they are based on absolute numbers (eg:muslim/non muslim...with me so far ?.......whereas various polls concerning who wants sharia law etc depend on random numbers of people questioned at any given moment of time or any given place, you could possibly do the same poll in one day and get different results according to whoever is asked...the latter here is of a more variable content.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
*Excuse the typo.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
Really? What about all those thousands of people who listed their religion as "Jedi"? What about all those people who don't actually go to church/synagogue/mosque but the head of the household put them down as Christian/Jewish/Muslim anyhow? What about all those people who are ethnically not British, but were born in the UK and don't even want to set foot in their parents' country of origin?
rewboss 2 years ago
well lets not believe anything then regardless of whatever it is huh and we'll all live in ignorant bliss.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
I have a better idea. Let's examine the data -- all of it, including the data that contradict pet theories -- and attempt to identify all the strengths and weaknesses of each set before coming to a decision about how much credence to lend each piece of it.
rewboss 2 years ago
We/you can approach this any way you like but that's kind of avoiding the issue that i feel rumbles underneath the surface here.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
too many non british living in britain itas too fucking much the slime are everywhere they get on my wick
they are nothing more than vermin
TheCasao86 2 years ago
Yeah. The Angles, the Saxons, the Jutes, the Danes, the Normans... we're all going to hell in a handcart, aren't we? We should paint ourselves blue and fight off the invaders before it's too late.
rewboss 2 years ago
You cannot Never say 'sharia law will never be, recognised in the UK' unless you have a crystal ball, you are simply prophesising and besides, the country has british law.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago 2
...yes, British law operates in the UK, which is why I don't expect to be lopping hands off shoplifters in the near future, and why I also expect that, in the future, "it was an honour killing, m'lud" will never be a viable defence against a murder charge. It's also the reason we won't be torpedoing boats off the coast of Libya just to teach Johnny Foreigner a lesson.
rewboss 2 years ago
I want you as my Supreme Leader u nose wot its awl abowt
Thanx hillarious
searchher1 2 years ago
without the polish builder britain would be fucked .....:-)
CapitanoGUC 2 years ago
Capitano- Right, mate. We Brits had no idea how to build anything until the Poles showed up last year. We stood under trees when it rained or dug a small hole in the ground.
demblin 2 years ago
no but you still god rediculs single glased windows wich are paintet about twenty times so that you can´t open them anymor which doesen´t matter, because the wind still pases - you got carpet in the toilet, which is disgusting. And all youre houses ar madout of extremly thin walls, so that you can hear your neigbour talking and the entire house is quacking if sommeone shots the door......
CapitanoGUC 2 years ago
Capitano- Are you a comedian?Are you taking the piss with such spelling?
demblin 2 years ago
übersetzung bitte =)
oOoLorenzoOo 2 years ago
Untertitel einschalten =)
rewboss 2 years ago
*rot anlauf* danke xDD
oOoLorenzoOo 2 years ago
that was hilarious! very well done!
i especially loved the overdone accent. did you grow up speaking like that or was it an imitation?
ErklaerMirDieWelt 2 years ago
No, it's not my natural accent. It slips a bit sometimes -- I'd be a terrible spy.
rewboss 2 years ago
Who's Othello LOL I love it.
michael2172 2 years ago
It's amazing how much Britain has in common with the U.S., LOL
This was really sharp; Nice job!
OhCurt 2 years ago
There are loonies everywhere, but at least in our countries they usually remain on the outer fringes.
It's a hot topic in the UK at the moment, because some members of all the mainstream parties have been caught fiddling their expenses, and people are worried that the extremist parties will benefit from voters' anger. European elections are happening right now, UK national elections due next year at the latest: people are getting a bit nervous.
rewboss 2 years ago