My Theory on Mirrors

[suckeefcukee]

solution: venetian mirror lol

[flashed00]

Did he died?

[kekkokekko89]

the best mirror reflects just 99% of the light... so its not endless

[dokuhaku2323]

good job. I appreciate your mind. Thanks for posting this theory.

[xxDarkAwpxx]

@dokuhaku2323 ah, cool, thanks man.

[buneter]

if you get 3 mirrors you can make it ifinite

[StrawberryzOMG]

good theory dude

[xxDarkAwpxx]

@StrawberryzOMG thanks

[SEBAzSoFLI]

wat song?

[pukenroll]

if you have two mirrors that are not connected to a cabinet, you will be able to bend one of them upwards therefore changing the path of the infinite repetition.

[Yesitis808]

answer: single-sided mirror paralleled with a regular mirror. just look through the single-sided. but then,since the single-sided is slightly see-through, you would still be unable to see the end(max veiw distance) because the light would ecape for every time it reflects back at the paralleled mirror.

[Yesitis808]

what im trying to say is, i agree.

[h3yype0ples]

2 get rid of the camera or eye point of view or whatever...... why not have a 3rd mirror? the 1st 2 facing each other and then trhe third one would form a open box, nad you be on the side of the box where there is no mirror, then angle tthe 3rd mirror by about 10 degrees or something, and you have a better view? just thought that up while watchin the video......

[kamalmichael]

the imperfection of the mirror will stop infinite images forming. Infinity is very interesting eg infinity has no shape, infinity scarifices width for lenght ect

[baconbag]

put a camera on the other side of a 2 way mirror

[TheNeoJer]

@baconbag

Buy see-tru mirrors

[xXOriginalDarkStarXx]

If you want to see an endless reflection simply put your web cam back up to the computer screen and observe.

[xxDarkAwpxx]

i already know that trick butit is so unnatural it doesn't have anything to do with what Im talking about. With the mirrors you aren't looking at reflection after reflection but rather a multiplication problem. ex. the left mirror is relected in the right mirror, therefor the left mirror's first two reflections are from itself, and then the next four in the second mirror are relections of the 2 in the left mirror and so on. the camera for one has lag and is infinite. mirrorscanbeperfectlyaligned

[blooboy4747]

@xxDarkAwpxx put eyeholes in the bottom of the mirror to stare into it. not the middle, the bootom....or top

[KrunchyGoodness]

@xXOriginalDarkStarXx Camera's that are linked to a computer screen output are digital. This means that the displayed image is only an approximation of the light input in terms of bits of information. This process would only multiply the image until the resolution makes the next smaller image insignificant, and the next image is not captured. This produces the maximum feedback but not endless feedback.

[rayjrusi]

no shit

[adracko]

I have an interesting idea for this...get a microfiber camera

[nikidizzi2]

this muthafucka is TRIPPIN BALLS!!

[Yutsoku]

Not quite infinity as explained here: gh4F5BQ8hgw

[D02747341]

Damn dog you must have been on some good shit! I mean shit that just blows your mind! Stop mixing white girl and yesca

[sinlifesin]

you can see the end...b/c the end is the beginning. its just an infinite number of reflections of themselves.

[halo3fan56]

try a camera with a fold out screen and turn it around so you can look into the screen to see everything

[aghachi]

your so faded lulz

[shortpunkskaterjew]

what if you get one of those two way mirrors that cops use in lineups

[PixlFace]

hahaha.. AWSOME MAN!!

i have tryed this and it bothers me.. :(

[britwigger]

Yo, I like yo style, homie! Ima try your experiment in the loo down the hall. Peace.

[Garylisk]

Cut a hole in the mirror. Or get a 2-way mirror. Or come up with an invisible viewing point.

[outlaw1181]

nice theory...i like the video...check out my video blogs everyone

[Demruth]

This in itself is not true. If you had 2 perfect mirrors facing each other so that no light was lost through the reflection, and you had a miniscule camera placed directly in the center of one mirror, looking directly at the center of the other mirror, but that camera was behind a one sided mirror, the reflective area lost due to the mirror over the camera being one sided would be so negligible, that you'd effectively see to infinity, until the reflections became too small in the distance.

[xxDarkAwpxx]

Well that's why it's called a theory, it's meant to be challenged.

[dirrenbb]

true but the image will always keep going, cazing u to use stronger lens and so on.

[KrunchyGoodness]

@Demruth No. You would have to have an infinitely small camera, which is impossible. You cannot have a perfectly reflective, one-sided mirror. You probably cannot have a perfectly reflective mirror either because the photons have to hit an atom, and the atoms cannot be everywhere. Also some of the light is lost if it's not in a vacuum. The "negligible" loss means that it cannot be infinite. Besides, light is a particle and a wave and therefore slightly affected by gravity.

[peppergod]

Mirrors drive me nuts.