From 9/11/2001: Flight 93 - missing from Pennsylvania!

[MarcoSantos340]

For those who believe on this, it´s impossible to make phone call on a plane, in the air, in 2001...

[Ravenshadow666x]

I'm not going to dignify the theorists but this one does truly confuse me. Out of all the plane crashes I've heard and seen on TV, There is usually something left of the plane. BUT then again, none of these crashes were a nose dive either.

[foreigngal412]

uh yea i live about 20 minutes from the crash site and both my parents and my grandma were dispatched when flight 93 went down. don't tell me that there wasn't a plane bc a girl who went to my school lost her mom on that flight...

[PaulLandis]

@foreigngal412

Sorry for your loss.

A stewardess friend of a friend was on Flt 77 on 9/11 that ‘crashed into to Pentagon’.

He found later she was sick, and missed the flight.

The stewardess replacement was reported killed at the Pentagon.

NO 757 hit the Pentagon AND the stewardess was reported dead.

Flt 93 did NOT crash in Pennsylvania.

Loose Change II: a plane was emptied of passengers in Cleveland ?? and never were seen again.

The people responsible for 9/11 are truly ruthless criminals.

[plumtube01]

I'm not a conspiracy theorist , but that looks nothing like any plane crash I've ever seen. A plane is basically a big aluminium can that just splats all over the place. They don't leave deep craters like that. And where are all the big bits? Thers pretty much always a big section of tail or something and debris thrown for hundreds of meters. Just looks way to neat for my liking.

[PUgrad05]

But who thinks that a plane that is basically fully fueled hitting the ground at nearly 500 miles an hour....what human remains would be left?

[animezlyfe]

@PUgrad05 that does not explain the plain....be realistic --.--''

[laminarwing]

No blood ? OF COURSE there was no blood !!! all bodies were totally desintegrated and burnt !! How conspirationists can be stupid, I can't believe it !!!!!

[poofberry]

i'm no conspiracy theorist but i'm still confused. i keep on hearing two different stories of how the plane crashed: one said that it was shot down and the other said that the terrorists deliberately crashed the plane when the passengers started to fight. obviously a plane with about 40 passengers and crew cant suddenly disapper to nowhere, but i'm still really confused.

[PaulLandis]

@poofberry

There WERE two different 'Official' 'versions as to what happened.

Each would have required airplane parts and human remains to be present at the crash site.

As you see in the Video, the Coroner found 'NO HUMAN Blood', there fore no human remains and not enough debris to fill a pick up truck. Flt. 93 Did NOT crash in PA as we were told.

Thank you for your question.

[jgr335mustang]

God bless the heros of flight 93.I wish there were more heros like this.Sorry to the families I would gladly take one of your loved ones places.Sorry for your loss.

[aklaira]

so what happened to the ppl from the flight

[Milkman995]

Have any of you witnessed images of a "REAL" Plane Crash there are planes that have hit the ground nose first at upwards of 400mph and debris has been scattered everywhere

[FIERO871]

I agree with mesa401. Everyone and everything would have been incinerated upon impact.

[PaulLandis]

@FIERO871

NO Plane crashed. There were NO fires reported

the coroner found NO evidence of human remains.

They lied to us.

[minutemaidenity]

@PaulLandis you are right! if a plane crashes everything does not become a debris...there are some parts of the plane that are left...also human body parts should also have been found in there...also if everything turned into ashes...why were the bandana, drivers liscence of the terrorist, and the drivers licence of the air attendent remained untouched?! wierd?! the environmentalists also inspected the area and reported that there was no jet fuel found in ground water or the soil

[brad5771]

Thus is BEEEEE ESSSSSS

[mesa401]

What the fuck do you think happens when a jet like that hits nose first, nearly straight down at about 400mph? You are all weirdos.

[PaulLandis]

@mesa401

NO Plane crashed. Plane engines and metal do not disintegrate: Jet fuel buning in air is not hot enough to melt airplane metal or engines.t

[shaky145]

i reckon they shot it down

[1Nyro]

watch?v=hcE2IFJ7wCY&feature=re­lated

Paste that after youtubedotcomslash.

[1Nyro]

watch?v=hcE2IFJ7wCY&feature=re­lated

[1Nyro]

Someone is removing comments on "Judea Declares War on Germany".

To the host, you're happy to investigate this false-flag operation but not the other!

[1Nyro]

My university is the same, what with global warming and all of that bollocks. If you really want to come up to my level of conspiracy, watch "Judea Declares War on Germany" in order to find out what majority is really perpetuating the N.W.O.

[1Nyro]

As naive as it may sound, since my very definition of open-mindedness is the ability to abandon everything you thought you ever knew, how far are you?

[1Nyro]

Trust me, mate, I am the biggest bloody exception out of everyone, so there is very little hope for the human race. My level of thinking is an a realm far beyond what the average person would even hear about, and I'm still learning. What's your stance on this issue anyway?

[dreadnaught2]

This video perfectly illustrates how moronic the truther movement is. A quote from Wally Miller appears near the end. A PARTIAL quote. By the partial quote it would appear that Wally Miller has doubts that flight 93 crashed. When you see the entire quote, and other actual souces, there is no question that Miller found body parts from flight 93 passengers. Truthers molest evidence and pass along gossip.

[1Nyro]

It will never happen.

[1Nyro]

Maybe there was no plane in the first place, who knows? All I know is that the 9/11 Commission Report is a crock of shit.

[1Nyro]

Pentagon confiscated it.

On a serious note, there is some footage showing the Pentagon attack but none will show you a plane.

[1Nyro]

See what? If you want to check out 9/11 you watch "Loose Change; 2nd edition". If you want to check out 7/7, you watch "7/7 London Bombings - Government Involvement".

[Cwall38]

they did it to cover up all the wrong the dick head cock sneeze murder bush did over his years of presidant

[ChloeMichael09]

One day I'd love to know just like everybody else the TRUTH behind 9/11.. Was it terorism? or all a government fix.

1 thing I think is strange is how the towers came down like a demolition. I wish 1of the planes missed 1 of the towers and landed in the hudson or somethin...and then if after 40 mins the tower still randomly came down like a demolition...We'd all have our answer.

[selenasmyidol123]

the americans r soo dumb they try 2 destroy their own country and cover it up so they dig a hole and say look a plane crashed here. the hole was there b4

[DareDude914]

Fuking Iraqn's!!! THey Suck Dick!

[Susieshepherd]

Thx for the video- I spent an hour yesterday staring at pictures of the Pentagon from every angle while the building was still smoking....there is no plane...there is nothing even close to remnants of a plane. And not only that, there is no way a "plane" caused the damage...no way in hell...

[b0ris360]

Why would the U.S set up this situation, then shoot the plane down and then cover it up? What would they gain. I could understand why they'd shoot it down if they thought terrorists had it! The theory that the U.S shot this plane down just supports the story that the plane was hijacked.

Why would they bother doing this if they'd already planned to attack the twin towers. The only thing people talk about is the WTC. Wouldn't that be enough to "make a case for war"

[1Nyro]

Because your government is so fucked up in the head, it can't even stage a simple false-flag attack on itself without making a complete and utter mess of it.

7/7 was pretty good though.

[b0ris360]

watch the vids called "loose change debate programe"

The makers of loose change get utterly owned in a live debate on this subject.

[1Nyro]

I've seen it, and it's weak both ways on the subject. Dylan Avery also stupidly said that his own film contained eorrors, dubious claims and conclusions that are not 100% backed up by the facts. This is him just being humble and saying that not everything is perfect. Quite frankly however, it doesn't matter what he says in the face of objectivity because a controlled demolition is what it is, as well as the missile that hit the Pentagon, so it changes absolutely nothing except his credibility.

[b0ris360]

1Nyro, Why would they use planes for the WTC but switch to a cruise missile for the pentagon? One single photo or piece of video footage from any witness would be catastrophic. Do you really believe that they would take that risk!

[1Nyro]

Because hitting a target as small as the Pentagon is impossible with an aeroplane. I have mountains of evidence that blow this story wide open. Message me if you want it.

[b0ris360]

Then surely the sensible answer would be 'don't bother targeting the Pentagon'. I simply don't believe that they'd fire a cruise missile. Would you? On the one hand we're to believe that they are ultra efficient conspirators capable of pulling of an mega complex, meticulously planned attack, and on the other hand be so dumb as to fire a U.S cruise missile past eye witnesses, in broad daylight into the Pentagon. Plus, all of the eye witnesses said it was a plane.

[1Nyro]

Dude, if you want evidence about the Pentagon being hit by a cruise missile, message me since there is plenty. In fact, I have rare footage of a missile actually being filmed, going into the Pentagon (seems authentic).

[izzysykopth]

You mean like Jaime McEntire? LOL!!!

[izzysykopth]

No airliners hit the towers either.

[b0ris360]

That comment says it all!

[izzysykopth]

Thats a fucking lame ass comment. Because Marc Roberts, Jim Meigs and David Dunbar are liars doent mean they owned anyone.

[FrostyBudIV]

FOX news is controlled by the NEW WORLD ORDER/ GOVERNMENT/ ILLUMINATI

[royalb17]

It was a drone or a missile like in Pentagon.

[starsandstripes50]

about the raging fuel fire. no one was there to film it, it takes a while to get there, i have been there myself and the fire trucks took more than one hour to get there unlike the towers.

plus the first thing fire fighters do when they get there is what? put out fires.

[PirinBG]

1. Where is the plane on the pictures? Check other similar airplane crashes. At this "crash" there is no airplane body at all.

2. They put the parts probably later to confuse people like you.

3. It makes no sense to find a single part after an airplane crash. Every part should be collected as evidence by the reconstruction of the crash.

Open your eyes and think!

[morph988]

D) there were no planes

[beastshawnee]

Rumsfield slipped up and accidently admitted the plane was shot down. But how did they identify all the people on board if there were no bodies or body parts? Did they just say they did? Or were there any people? Had they all been unloaded and what--Killed--somewhere else?

[PaulLandis]

Hi Beastshawnee,

Your questions are very valid.

I posted this video because as Evidence, it shows we were lied to: No plane, including Flight 93, crashed in PA as we were told.

Whatever happened to missing passengers, did not happen at the PA Crash site.