Added: 5 years ago
From: gpris75
Views: 381,158
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (245)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • these guys cant drive for shit and/or those arent heffner cars

  • gallardos pladdle shifts are surprisingly slow :/

  • 12.4 is slow for this gay car, try a brand new ZR1 now mr. heffner, and see if its still gay like u said. (low 11s)

  • @Dutil35 who cares you stupid shit its a lamborghini its not hopped up its a sport car thats luxurious .Thats like sayin why by rolls royce for 250,000 when you can buy an m6 for 80 and its faster..who cares bout speed

  • a stock gtr does 11. What a waste of money

    

  • @maoristereo lambo is much more luxurious than a gtr stupid fuck

    

  • mmm ... the gap looked a lot bigger than the times suggested

  • Those cars arent tuned

  • my 2 dream cars side by side

  • seems like just because you own a fast car, it doesn't come with driver mod

  • anyone else see the ferrari jump?

  • lambo=sexy ferriari=not as sexy

  • @TheKbum Lamborghini's have all wheel drive...

  • Well, kinda saw ETs and trap speed. Get a tripod. Too much jiggling.

  • Toyota won

    Who agrees?

  • all that money and they can't even break into 11's??????? hot garbage

  • that f430 isn't to pretty....i can't stand soft tops on cars like that!

  • My bike is faster

  • @ericjkent But still everybody will look at the guy with the lambo and not on your bike.

  • My 5000 dollar motorcycle runs the quarter mile faster.

  • @ericjkent no shit

  • @ericjkent agreed! even my "little" 600RR runs a 10.5

  • @ericjkent

    No comparison...

    You are faster but a car is a car...

  • I don't think those guys pushed their cars all that hard. neither one really broke loose.

  • What the? A tune subi does 12sec..

  • THEM SHYTS WAS SLOW!!! I SEEN FASTER OLD SKOOLS WIT LESS HORSEPOWER

  • Loves Lamborghinis! If I were to win the lottery (lols ya right) I would have to buy me like 3 Lambos!

  • lambo all day

  • lambo forever xxx

  • the lambo have awd, and the ferrari have rwd. so the lambo gets a headstart

  • i expected these cars to be faster...M3 and ISF run 12s

  • the F-430 have an amazing and louder sound than the lambo, but i like more lambos.. :P

  • u can't even hear the ferrari

  • la ferrari è una versione con la capotè

    quindi è normale che sia meno veloce e meno aereodinamica visto che ha la tela al posto del metallo come tettuccio.

    una ferrari col tetto rigido avrebbe vinto

  • @monkeymarine291

    ferrari enzo will smoke ford gt

  • ferrari can lick my ballz

  • @kktpp what about it run over your greasy ballZ ROFL

  • BIGGY BIG TURBO WHOLES... BOTH

  • You dream large jpcuddy. A supra and some change leftover for beer.

  • really amazing sound!!!!!

  • Super cars!!! , where's all the crapanese super junk.

  • Doing something better!

  • true point you make Mateuszak but then try a lambo reventon or lp 670 sv against a scuderia

  • 12's LOL...what a waste of money!!!

  • i see ur just getting into cars? with a comment like that it shows

  • 12s haha i dont think its worth it to much money id expect them to run 10s at least ...there nice and i would love to own one but id rather build me a supra with the money i would waste on a lambo

  • Valid point, but still, its like pussy, it may all do the same, some a little better than others, but whats on the outside sure as shit does count for something..

  • the lambo can do much better. the car is great and very fast, usually when a car doesn't perform to peoples' expectations, then that means the driver is not capable of driving that car at it's limits.

    a gallardo se could probably do mid 11s on a drag strip.

  • the new italia 458 looks sick, but so does the lp560, i wanna see a race with those two whenever the italia comes out

  • I take the Ferrari- is faster around the track.

    And that is no fair- Gallardo SE vs basic 430... Try Scuderia...

  • scuderia kills

  • It's the F430 Spider, too. It's slightly slower than the Berlinetta Coupe

  • Lambo is way better than ferrari!!!

  • Not really

  • I would rather take the GT int the begining of this clip = )

  • yes! i saw that too.

  • what a waist of money

  • he lambo isnt original

  • FUK U MA

  • Who won?

  • The Lambo won

  • which one has lambo doors?

  • the murcialago has the scissor doors. the gallardo does not

  • ... my dodge stealth tt does better than that U.U

    and is sexy to xD

  • Lol I love how they get such low numbers with granny shifting, makes me die inside that they still have the ability to go even faster than that if they do power shifts hahaha Nice Race!

  • who knows either way a dumb ass...!..

  • no shit, lets ask that guy who would win between a testarossa and a ferrari

  • I m pretty sure his gonna say the Ferrari...!!!

  • honestley i like the lambo but the murcielago is better

  • a MURCIELAGO is a LAMBO you fuck face~!

  • i like chevy's,but vettes are better

  • yeah thats what i said.....what a dumb fuck!!!

  • i think he means he prefers a murcielago over the gallardo, or hes just a dipshit lol

  • come on.. the ferrari is a spyder. not as good aerodynamics as the lambo

  • lambo power

  • both launched liked ass

  • lambos are better

  • "That is NOT a TT Gallardo! "

    Don't go trying to change the matchup. It is what it is and the Lambo did win so I don't see the point in bitching. That is not a 430 Scuderia either if you insist on going down that road.

  • lmfao ferrari got owned...

    simply put, awd owns rwd on the strip.

    what i find funny is that my 1978 cb750 runs 12.0 at 125 mph... faster then both these cars....

    and about a couple 100,000 dollars less xD

  • It might be faster but not even close looks wise.

  • hahaha, agreed. The Gallardo is such a disaster. It looks like the Murcielago's retarded younger brother or something.

  • no its not

  • F430

  • lambo has awd should have launnched it a little

  • to all dumbasses, the lambo won, dont say the ferrari lost kuz it weights more kuz its a convertible, thats gay, and think of it, lambos are Awd, ferraris are 2wd, so lambos have more weight lol see? omfg lolol

  • the ferrari has a disadvantage, it's a convertible: which means it weighs more

  • ferrari actually said that the convertible is just as fast and the hardtop and it,s true look at acceleration speeds

  • yea, by 20 pounds?

  • lambor ghini wins they rock

  • they look so good together..

  • ferrari the biggesttttttttttt italiannn styleee

  • The Ferrari was quicker (12"04''') vs the Lambo's 12"42'''

    Doesn't mean it would alsways be faster, but nice to see that a Ferrari still has what it takes!

    Porsche 911 GT3 RS would school both of them. Even a 911 Turbo most probably...

  • a corvette zo6 would school all of them and its much cheaper in price :)

  • its not just the performance in these cars that matter..its the feel..i ve driven a few vettes which were plenty fast but had nothing on this 308 gtb i also had the pleasure of driving

  • yeah but one problem! these cars are not 1/4 mile cars. Oh and second! it depends on the driver. Please my friend look for a video called boxalade vs zo6 and you will see a chevy caprice own a 08 zo6.

  • Comment removed

  • Actually, the Ferrari ran a 12.84, making it 4 tenths slower than the Lambo in that race.

  • ZO6 would still smoke these cars

    11's all day on the track

  • no one cares doubles the lambo is a neck turner

  • excuseme but the lambo has won...

    lamborghini 12.42

    ferrari 12.84

  • the ferrari was 12.84 not 12.04

  • lamborghini has best acceleration

    therefore its good for these sorta races

  • lmao 12 second quarter mile... i was expecting way more

  • lmao me too

  • those are two favorite exotic cars right there

  • lol at 12's.

  • nice video..

    and LOL at the douchebags who talk about their STI's etc. Dont hate becuase you cant afford a supercar. These guys dont buy their cars for their speeds. If that was the case you would see more Miatas with V8's tucked into them. Lambo is #1

  • of course lambo is going to win they always have always will.

  • Pretty slow for super cars. If I put another 500 bucks into my STi I'de be running mid 12's....

  • and it would still be an STI...

  • hahahahhahahahha

  • really? wow.. who knew?

  • Apparently, not you =). Lemme guess you own an STI or something of the like?

  • =))))

  • lolol. Nice.

  • my renault 21 2.0L turbo its quicker.....

  • God thier only running mid 12's...

  • the ferrari driver was an a** hole

  • Why do you say that?

  • is that a gallardo lp-560?

  • i can help

  • Ferrari is all around better in EVERY WAY!!!

  • Sound? I think NOT!

  • Yea I think the Ferrari sounds better

  • VERY SLOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • compared to what?

  • skylines... just to start off with, is the price tag really even worth it? Plus this gallardo is TT...

  • lambos are so much sexier than ferraris

  • Lamborghinis _sexier_ than Ferraris? All I can say to that one is that I'd rather have a woman with curves like a Ferrari than the lack thereof in a Lamborghini.

  • i love the lambos but not more than the ferrari enzo because the aerodynamics are just too HOT to resist!!!

  • Dang dude! That Gallardo better win! Ferrari's suck! Nice vid!

  • He bought that lambo from me ;P

  • I was there and got to sit in the lambo :P

  • This is not Heffner Gallardo. It takes 850 bhp Heffner Gallardo just 10,5 seconds to cover 402 metres.

  • They're both fast--I don't think a fraction of a second is much a trade off for the Ferrari's having considerably more class. I think that when cars reach this level of performance that drag racing is a pathetic display of their appeal when it should be their appearance and feel--these are not muscle cars.

  • agreed

  • Well you have seen a car costing more than 1 Million of Dollars (Money stolen or coming out of dubious business ?) for such a Million i would expect a car driven by a nuclear fusion reactor going 2x supersonic speed but this car is only a simple old fashioned Otto engine toy hehe thats wasted money. E Watch such a BMW 525i its very very sporty an can do 60 Miles an hour in 6 seconds AND it only costs 3000 Dollars today ;) Thats very nice ;))

  • yr dumb

  • ferrari is a drop top. convertibles=heavier than hard top.

  • the f430 convert and coupe are the same they raced them both on top gear head to head...

  • Lamborghini>Ferrari

    enuff said..

  • lol gellardo pwnd that guy.

  • their fast, noisy and both fit in to my garage....

  • in my garage too!

  • Not a fair race, because the f430 was a spyder, which is heavier than the hard top version. Plus, it was only one race. I'd like to see the results of 5 races and the average of them all.

  • i love lambos alot more than Ferrari but i have to agree and F430 would bet a Gallardo

  • VIVA LA LAMBORGHINI!

  • why buy a mustang if you have 300.000

    dumbass

  • The Gallardo PWNED the F430!!!

  • with 4wd you cant rip out of the whole it will stall

  • im suprsed the f430 kept up wit da gallardo because da gallardo is all wheel drive...

  • No. Wrong. This Gallardo, if my memory serves, is rear wheel drive. Furthermore, RWD only helps on the launch. Afterwards, it probably is a detriment. FInally, I think a stock Gallardo is faster than a F430 anyhoo. Great video. I like being able to see this car, especially after reading about it in the C&D 0-200-0 Challenge.

  • actually its the opposite. awd(4wd) helps on the launch and after is a detriment. the gallardo has a notoriously weak clutch(probably built that way on purpose so people dont break the drivetrain) though and is easy to fry which is probably why he went easy.

  • tehspork> Thanks for correcting me. I thought I had typed in AWD, but looking at my post, I put in RWD. My bad. ~embarrassed~ As far as the Heffner Gallardo, if this is the same car that was in C&D, it is converted to RWD and from the write-up in the mag, it was solid enough during several high-stress runs during the competition.

  • It depends, i think, on the amount of power and torque you try to feed through the wheels. For huge power and torque figures 4wd is a must. With less power, a 4wd car doesn't react as quickly as a rwd car. A drag between a Porsche 997 Carrera S and an Audi R8, on short distances is won by the Carrera S wich starts better off the line. In time the Audi does catch up due tu superior power but start wise, weight distribution in this case is decisive.

  • vlad> All things equal, you're going to get a way better start with AWD. That's just pure physics, in this case, the grip of the powered wheels between the road and the wheels. With AWD, there's twice the contact patch (roughly).

  • We will just have to agree to dissagree. I hear what you say and, i agree partly, but there are many variables involved : grip, power, weight, internal friction, strenght of the parts involved, etc. Think of the european light weight cars : Lotus Exige, Caterham, Ariel Atom. They will put to shame a Mucielago, Gallardo, 0-60. Depends greatly, i think . . .

  • vlad> This isn't a matter of "opinion". This is math.

    If cars are the same weight, basically normal weight distribution and similar power output, the AWD car is going to kick the RWD car in the junk off the line.

    The lightweights you bring up get good starts because of the fact that they are superlight and they don't have to fight nearly as much inertia as the heavier AWD cars.

  • Wich is what i said in the first post. You can't dismiss a 4X4 system's weight. No two cars, one AWD and one RWD, but otherwise the same, will weigh the same. AWD is heavy. Plus awd cars that use viscous couplings are notorious for being slow. A fixed ratio(ex. 40:60) with gears and hidraulic clutch is fast but if you have a variable system with viscous couplings, it is going to spend the first half second deciding where to send the power and the next half actualy sending it.

  • Agreed with what you're saying. Still, in general, an AWD set-up usually has the advantage from the dig.

  • Plus clutches are fairly "weak" points of the transmission components. The Murcielago i mentioned earlier should not be revved up past 5000 rpm when having a fast start or when shifting into 2nd gear because in time it will break the clutch. You say that between two cars same everything, weight and all, the AWD would win. In a lab, same conditions and a great AWD system, you would be right. But real life, that situation is hard to achieve and it takes more than AWD to decide a drag . . .

  • Where are the turns, bends...?! That's where the real cars come around. For drag strips there are american cars.

  • yah i hate that we dont put much effort into cars overall performance and more often than not its top speed

  • the gallardo should not be considered a supercar. Also it is ridiculously loud. It was funny when the gt40 just moved to the side lol.

  • ridiculously loud is what makes it so good, have you heard one in real life? your ears pop, and everybody on the road shits their pants and looks your way.

  • I agree with IPK, the awesome sound is one of the great things about the Gallardo. This Heffner version has around 800 HP.

  • Agree. I drove the Gallardo and seriously you can't rev it past about 5000 when kids are around because it will simply scare them to death :)

  • what do you mean with that

  • it is immensely loud!

  • i like it when the american car just moves to one side. lol

  • Gallardo's are pretty nice looking cars, you can get one used for around 150k. Not bad for a supercar. It doesnt have the top end performance of many of the expensive supercars, but it still kicks butt.

  • a 43,000$ gt500 can run that time haha. a bit overpriced they are

  • a $10,000 f-body can run that time!

  • the gt500 is awesome but it has nothing on the gallardo

  • "Heffner's Gallardo SE - 650BHP, 2 turbochargers :) 0-60 in 3 secs on manual :)"

    Riiiight. Stop pulling numbers out of your ass. Idiot.

  • were talking about quarter mile times...not 0-60 times dumbass