Hello, I want to buy GeForce® GTX 560 2048MB, but I want to know if worth the money instead of GeForce® GTX 560 1024MB. Whit CUDA the plus 1 gb is rentable,
@xrospider Well, if you have many many layers, rendering at 1080p or more, i recommend getting the 2GB...If you just do a little color correction and render at 720p or 1080p, then the 1GB will be ok.
@learninglounge you mean Mb/s? in any case: yes. if you have a proper raid setup. personally i would favor a raid 10 with around 6-8 2TB drives. best price/performance+storage you can get at the moment. that might change in a year if SSD technology becomes much cheaper. then you would just get a 500GB disk for the workspace and scratch and a few cheap raid 1 arrays for backup.
One of my three workstations has a GTX560Ti and works just fine. All I had to do was manually add it to the 'accepted processor' list. I already run RAID5's, but that's for security not speed and they've been quite adequate for work speed. However, my next box upgrades will be SATA3 120GB SSD's. Probably Mushkins. One OS ssd and One Scratch ssd for each box. Get only SATA3 and the 120GB's seem to be becoming the most bang for the buck... $150 to $180 range.
I cut video for FOX with Premiere Pro, and do a LOT of it. Rendering is the time killer and the determinate is... the more Cuda cores available the better. In the overall workflow, Editing Playback is secondary to all the Render Time you could be wasting. For an entire project, end to end, go for: nVidia GTX 570 or 580 THEN lots of fast RAM THEN fast Storage.
RAM usage decreased (from 8 tot 4gb) due to the faster GDDR ram on the graphics card. I'd say looking at this video, the graphics card is more important :/
How did you manage to get the GTX560 enabled without the hack? Its not on the supported GPUs list for Premiere pro. Only the GTX470, 570 and 580 are there...
It's not really a hack, you just need to add a line to it's configuration file to make it recognize your card. In it's main install file, there is a file called cuda_supported_cards.txt. Open it up and add "GeForce GTX 560". It will now recognize your card and allow you to use it's power for rendering and processing.
Thanks for the answere
xrospider 1 week ago
Hello, I want to buy GeForce® GTX 560 2048MB, but I want to know if worth the money instead of GeForce® GTX 560 1024MB. Whit CUDA the plus 1 gb is rentable,
Thanks for the answer.
xrospider 2 weeks ago
@xrospider Well, if you have many many layers, rendering at 1080p or more, i recommend getting the 2GB...If you just do a little color correction and render at 720p or 1080p, then the 1GB will be ok.
quangluu96 1 week ago
is this good for renering: gtx 550 ti 1 gb gddr5. i5 2500k. kingston 8 gb ddr3 1333 mhz. 1x 1tb 7200 rpm. 1x 500 gb 7200 rpm. asus p8p67 evo. ?
nVidiaGTX100 3 weeks ago
6990 views o_O
unrefillable 4 weeks ago
We currently use HDV video which has a 25MB/s bandwidth - do you think we would get much of an improvement using the RAID array?
learninglounge 1 month ago
@learninglounge you mean Mb/s? in any case: yes. if you have a proper raid setup. personally i would favor a raid 10 with around 6-8 2TB drives. best price/performance+storage you can get at the moment. that might change in a year if SSD technology becomes much cheaper. then you would just get a 500GB disk for the workspace and scratch and a few cheap raid 1 arrays for backup.
ssuuppeerrbbooyy 1 month ago
...also...
One of my three workstations has a GTX560Ti and works just fine. All I had to do was manually add it to the 'accepted processor' list. I already run RAID5's, but that's for security not speed and they've been quite adequate for work speed. However, my next box upgrades will be SATA3 120GB SSD's. Probably Mushkins. One OS ssd and One Scratch ssd for each box. Get only SATA3 and the 120GB's seem to be becoming the most bang for the buck... $150 to $180 range.
yahoouser105 1 month ago
@yahoouser105 What kind of processor are you running?
parrishboys 1 month ago
I cut video for FOX with Premiere Pro, and do a LOT of it. Rendering is the time killer and the determinate is... the more Cuda cores available the better. In the overall workflow, Editing Playback is secondary to all the Render Time you could be wasting. For an entire project, end to end, go for: nVidia GTX 570 or 580 THEN lots of fast RAM THEN fast Storage.
yahoouser105 1 month ago
Hey, I have a question.. would a RAID array be better than an SSD in this case? Thanks!
freedomfighter213 1 month ago
Thanks.. Very helpful - to me at least :)
teknastyk 2 months ago
RAM usage decreased (from 8 tot 4gb) due to the faster GDDR ram on the graphics card. I'd say looking at this video, the graphics card is more important :/
Martinchief 3 months ago
So would you say that a solid state scratch disk would be even better than the RAID array?
parrishboys 5 months ago
@parrishboys I have the same question!
freedomfighter213 1 month ago
How did you manage to get the GTX560 enabled without the hack? Its not on the supported GPUs list for Premiere pro. Only the GTX470, 570 and 580 are there...
afthefragile 6 months ago 8
@afthefragile I've asked in the official forums, along with some condiscending remarks on using a gaming card they said it would work.
TheAuroraTechShow 1 month ago
It's not really a hack, you just need to add a line to it's configuration file to make it recognize your card. In it's main install file, there is a file called cuda_supported_cards.txt. Open it up and add "GeForce GTX 560". It will now recognize your card and allow you to use it's power for rendering and processing.
ravenhawk82 1 month ago
@ravenhawk82 but i have a GTX560ti and if i import "GeForce GTX 560ti" it doesn't recognize
MrGoeiegozer 3 weeks ago
yea this is weird, i thought gtx 570 and 580 were the only ones that were compatible with premier pro (in the 500 series)
plutomok 6 months ago 3
mwf 4chan links this
AnArousedPanda 6 months ago
Wait wait wait... so the 560 TI is compatable without the little "hack?"
pixuma 7 months ago
@pixuma correct.
AMOGON 7 months ago