In order to believe it was controlled demolition you have to believe the planes were flown into the exact floor where the explosives were set and that the impact didn't dislodge, damage or cause an early detonation of the expolsives. (That would be impossible for those of you who coulnd't figure it out.)
It's funny how there are a lot of these "debunkers" especially the psychos on JREF who simply deny that anyone heard any kind of explosions from the towers before the collapsed.
Kevin are you blind? There was so much evidence that they had to get rid of on that day, they used the explosives to do it. Once the towers were down, they started to come up plans to "Move" the metal away. Why was it that urgent when there could have possibly been people still trapped underneath? Don't give me Bush didn't know or anyone else higher up didn't. The Pentagon didn't even look like a plane went into it, but just exploded.
put it this way. i bet if you were to fly a plane into any other tall building in the usa. it would not collaspe. whats the chance that 2 building both collaspe within 15 mins of each other. odds on that happening are very high.
if you drop a nickel from the top of the empire state building it will cause some damage on whatever it hits. if you drop it from 2 stories up it will cause less damage. now think about the top 15 floors that fell due to the plane crash....do you get what im saying? do the math...there were no explosives and there is no conspiracy...the media twists your mind to believe their propaganda. 9/11 was caused by crazy taliban terrorist motherfuckers. now pay some respect for all those who died.
I don't think so. You're alleging that the building top part causes huge damage comparable to falling from top to the bottom (as if over the side) but when only falling floor by floor, not a great distance.
But I think what you say, Kevin, draws attention to what I suspect is the real truth about 9/11 & the twin towers. The reason the building collapsed as it did could be due to controlled explosions, safety-security explosives installed in the towers in case of a situation like this. >>
... Perhaps explosives were installed by officials a long time ago, maybe before the last bomb attempt on the towers, maybe after, maybe recently before Sept '01. Perhaps there were threats made to blow up the buildings' top parts and create the kind of destruction Kevin suggests. Should the top parts fall away from the towers, the impact would be massive and potentially over a very wide area - many towers in the district. >
... The reasoning behind explosives being kept in strategic points in the twin towers would have been in such a situation as this, where the least destruction or loss of life may appear to be caused by having the towers "safely" implode upon themselves. There is sound reasoning, as warning may be given, or discovery, enabling evacuation of most people from the towers in a couple of hours, meaning controlled implosion would be the safest option.
Perhaps the officials acted in a way they are not proud of and now see that they caused more destruction. It may be embarrassment and a poor judgement that would be preventing admission of the controlled explosion of the towers.
Is what I am suggesting what people mean by 9/11 cover up, inside job, conspiracy? Or do people mean the whole thing - in some way official involvement in the airplane hijackings & crashes?
I'm asking people to answer what they feel they mean.
@kevinhirstius if there wasn't explosives why in the collapse steel was push outwards fly 500 yards across the street plus how does 15 stories completely destroy 90 stories of building
ur fuckin jeeeeeeeeeeeeeew i know u r , the way ur concentrating about those who died well we all do, taliban looooooooooooool 9/11 coused by fuckin zionists ofcourse u dont wana that to be exposed but it did
There are lots of videos that show smoke at the bottom watch 911 panic in newyork pt1 and 2 you hear the explosion before the collapse but you believe what you like.
even if there were no bombs in the towers, how the hell do two towers hit at the top end up falling almost totally in their own footprint. i could understand the top section that was damaged falling down but the whole building? it seems aside from fire and debris, 3/4 of the towers were untouched.
those who seek the truth will find it whether what they think turns out right or wrong but either way it sure as hell beats sitting on your butt doing nothing and only knowing what your told.
Your words, not mine. I don't doubt they heard explosions, just as I don't doubt there were many things that could produce sound like an explosion.
Burning fires, jet fuel, crashing concrete, crashing pieces of steel and electrical transformers are just some of possibilities. All of them would produce sounds of explosions, some would actually explode, but that doesn't mean there were bombs in the buildings.
Insisting validity on such disproven information is dishonest, however.
Absolutely, a 10 million ton building is going to make a lot of noise coming down.
However, where's common sense? It wasn't just the Twin Towers. There was also Tower 7, the Pentagon, & Shanksville. There are things in each of these components of 9/11, which don't add up.
How could a 47 story building completely collapse?
How come no evidence of planes-fuselage, luggage, engines, bodies, wing sections at either crash site?
Minor abnormalities, most of which have banal explanations.
Flight 93: 95% of the plane was found. It wasn't found in the first five minutes, but that hardly matters.
Pentagon: there is plenty of evidence of a plane crash.
Considering the fire department knew the WTC was going to collapse, due to intense fires in the building, any conspiracy steming from it is rather loony. 300+ firefighters died in the WTC, but they were concerned about them in building 7?
If evidence now means "unicorns and fairy dust", then I guess I'm living there. Feel free to enjoy your trip, and pay $7 for 0.50$ worth of 'non-profit' merchandise. :)
If the US economy doesn't collapse, will you keep believing into this nonesense?
In Iceland, maybe, yes. But not in the rest of the world, not by a long shot. In fact, the ETA for recovery was pushed forward by about 6 months from the "optimistic" estimates from earlier this year.
First off the jet fuel was gone in less that 30 seconds. There were explosions even before the first strike. There were obvious explosions 20 floors below the "pancake" zone. There were explosions on the "b" level that broke the ankles of people in the floor above. Cars in the b levels were tossed about and damaged and chunks of concrete were hurled about. Mchrozni we can all check your profile. You are a nobody.
My, my, my, that's one big inflated ego you have there.
As for the rest, it's just the same bullshit we've been listening to for years now. None of it has been proven, or can be imagined in an remotely realistic scenario for that matter.
Perhaps we should introduce a new definition for bullshit -s (n): 9/11 Conspiracy theory, 9/11 Controlled demolition theory
I judge you from your comments and your profile. Since that is all the information available at the time. The real bullshit is what comes off your keyboard. It's symtomatic of what is going on in your mind.
9/11 was an Zionist Job (Mossad/CIA) for the Zionist New World Order. Wake up folks, that why it is NOT in the Zionist Mass Media, yes we know story Wars for Israel, blood for Oil and Wars on Peace.
how do people not see that its fake. 9/11. theres so much evidence prooving that the planes didnt actually take down the towers or even touch the pentagon
watch the movie zeiteigst or somkething like that. and its around youtube. the towers were built to witstand blows like that unless they cut the inside structure diagonaly which in pictures of the rubble you see them in a diaggonal cut and then theres also the 3 explosions AFTER the planes crashed which witnesses reported from the basement. and in the pentagon this ones hard to explain search up 9/11 pentagon footage and go until you see a pic of a dude with glasses
People hearing explosions from the basement is hardly evidence (unless the lawyer is the same as OJ Simpson had). These towers were NOT built to withstand the impact of aircraft travelling at 450mph. NOBODY envisaged such a terrorist act taking place. It was a testiment to the architect that the towers didn't collapse immediately.
I appreciate what you're saying Jimbo. The things that concern me are the more extreme conspiracy theories. As a Brit, I have plenty of reason to despise Bush and his administration, after our country was bullied into going into war in Iraq. I think it's crystal clear to everyone that whatever their view about 9/11, Bush used it as an excuse to go to war with whoever he chose. I hope he is brought to account someday.
Actually they were designed to withstand a plane crash. Do some damn research. There is overwhelming evidence supporting they could not have fell from fire.
All goverments/media are in on it, this is the tip of a very big iceberg, it ends with the slaughter of what they term the useless eaters and the enslavement of those that are left. They tried to do it all at once but that failed so they are doing it in increments so peaple will not notice.
there were construction workers in the buildings before the attack, It shows that bush is with the terrorists, if the terrorists are terrorists, it may be his own terrorist organization. The planes were hijacked by terrorists from bushes terrorist organization, I suspect that. The pentagon alredy had bombs, they were detonated at the perfect time so the plane whould blow up and there whould be no proof. The planes were just a distraction for the bombs to go of.
there is no way that the United States Government can explain away these explosions that are heard in this video as the buildings floor collpasing down on to each other although they will try.
maybe not today but someday the truth will be exposed.
In order to believe it was controlled demolition you have to believe the planes were flown into the exact floor where the explosives were set and that the impact didn't dislodge, damage or cause an early detonation of the expolsives. (That would be impossible for those of you who coulnd't figure it out.)
Snotlaw1 4 months ago
This is blatant evidence of an inside job
Sideler74 4 months ago
...and when they got to Iraq they said, "Mission Accomplished".
Born2Flesh 9 months ago
Just listen to the disgusting zombies in the background. Up till now they still act like disgusting fox news zombies.
DominicanDomination 10 months ago
It's funny how there are a lot of these "debunkers" especially the psychos on JREF who simply deny that anyone heard any kind of explosions from the towers before the collapsed.
TheStroomis 1 year ago
Kevin are you blind? There was so much evidence that they had to get rid of on that day, they used the explosives to do it. Once the towers were down, they started to come up plans to "Move" the metal away. Why was it that urgent when there could have possibly been people still trapped underneath? Don't give me Bush didn't know or anyone else higher up didn't. The Pentagon didn't even look like a plane went into it, but just exploded.
TheQueenoftheDead 1 year ago 2
Check out The New Hiroshima by Judy Wood
JZJYRWO 1 year ago
put it this way. i bet if you were to fly a plane into any other tall building in the usa. it would not collaspe. whats the chance that 2 building both collaspe within 15 mins of each other. odds on that happening are very high.
who8allthepies 1 year ago
Kevin, WAKE UP!
I don't know were you live, but if you are from USA open your eyes and connect the brain.
1+1 in my country = 2
They told you = 5
mrdacaisa 2 years ago
if you drop a nickel from the top of the empire state building it will cause some damage on whatever it hits. if you drop it from 2 stories up it will cause less damage. now think about the top 15 floors that fell due to the plane crash....do you get what im saying? do the math...there were no explosives and there is no conspiracy...the media twists your mind to believe their propaganda. 9/11 was caused by crazy taliban terrorist motherfuckers. now pay some respect for all those who died.
kevinhirstius 2 years ago
I don't think so. You're alleging that the building top part causes huge damage comparable to falling from top to the bottom (as if over the side) but when only falling floor by floor, not a great distance.
But I think what you say, Kevin, draws attention to what I suspect is the real truth about 9/11 & the twin towers. The reason the building collapsed as it did could be due to controlled explosions, safety-security explosives installed in the towers in case of a situation like this. >>
lecochonbleu 2 years ago
cont.
2
... Perhaps explosives were installed by officials a long time ago, maybe before the last bomb attempt on the towers, maybe after, maybe recently before Sept '01. Perhaps there were threats made to blow up the buildings' top parts and create the kind of destruction Kevin suggests. Should the top parts fall away from the towers, the impact would be massive and potentially over a very wide area - many towers in the district. >
lecochonbleu 2 years ago
cont.
3
... The reasoning behind explosives being kept in strategic points in the twin towers would have been in such a situation as this, where the least destruction or loss of life may appear to be caused by having the towers "safely" implode upon themselves. There is sound reasoning, as warning may be given, or discovery, enabling evacuation of most people from the towers in a couple of hours, meaning controlled implosion would be the safest option.
Perhaps officials would never admit it
lecochonbleu 2 years ago
cont.
4
Perhaps the officials acted in a way they are not proud of and now see that they caused more destruction. It may be embarrassment and a poor judgement that would be preventing admission of the controlled explosion of the towers.
Is what I am suggesting what people mean by 9/11 cover up, inside job, conspiracy? Or do people mean the whole thing - in some way official involvement in the airplane hijackings & crashes?
I'm asking people to answer what they feel they mean.
lecochonbleu 2 years ago
@kevinhirstius if there wasn't explosives why in the collapse steel was push outwards fly 500 yards across the street plus how does 15 stories completely destroy 90 stories of building
rockets6743 1 year ago
@kevinhirstius
ur fuckin jeeeeeeeeeeeeeew i know u r , the way ur concentrating about those who died well we all do, taliban looooooooooooool 9/11 coused by fuckin zionists ofcourse u dont wana that to be exposed but it did
nice try jew looooooooooooooooooooooool
amasat71 1 year ago
in this video you can see the center columns still standing. which makes the collapse time even longer then what the twoofers lie about.
taledarkside 2 years ago
i didn't see anything in that red box. i was told there was a plume of smoke. didn't see it. Sorry thruthers.
mrtyles 2 years ago
There are lots of videos that show smoke at the bottom watch 911 panic in newyork pt1 and 2 you hear the explosion before the collapse but you believe what you like.
djassimilator 2 years ago
it did sound an awful lot like an exposion.
mrtyles 2 years ago
i didn't see anything in that red box. what was that red box supposed to show?
mrtyles 2 years ago
It shows in the red box a cloud of dust coming out of the base of the tower. many other views show it much more clearly.
johnknoefler 2 years ago
Comment removed
UbeRationale 2 years ago
even if there were no bombs in the towers, how the hell do two towers hit at the top end up falling almost totally in their own footprint. i could understand the top section that was damaged falling down but the whole building? it seems aside from fire and debris, 3/4 of the towers were untouched.
those who seek the truth will find it whether what they think turns out right or wrong but either way it sure as hell beats sitting on your butt doing nothing and only knowing what your told.
Drowzyy 3 years ago
It's rather obvious that the audio is not synchronized with the picture. The rumble ends before the tower has collapsed.
Way to go, 'truth' seekers. That's slam dunk evidence which side uses fakery to make their case.
McHrozni 3 years ago
Yeah, I guess the hundreds who made out alive and claimed to hear explosions were just hallucinating. Those videos are on YouTube too.
So, according to you, we should all go back to sleep. "The government loves us and would never do anything manipulate the people."
jbadyna 3 years ago
Your words, not mine. I don't doubt they heard explosions, just as I don't doubt there were many things that could produce sound like an explosion.
Burning fires, jet fuel, crashing concrete, crashing pieces of steel and electrical transformers are just some of possibilities. All of them would produce sounds of explosions, some would actually explode, but that doesn't mean there were bombs in the buildings.
Insisting validity on such disproven information is dishonest, however.
McHrozni 3 years ago
Absolutely, a 10 million ton building is going to make a lot of noise coming down.
However, where's common sense? It wasn't just the Twin Towers. There was also Tower 7, the Pentagon, & Shanksville. There are things in each of these components of 9/11, which don't add up.
How could a 47 story building completely collapse?
How come no evidence of planes-fuselage, luggage, engines, bodies, wing sections at either crash site?
The whole thing wreaks of a criminal conspiracy.
jbadyna 3 years ago
Minor abnormalities, most of which have banal explanations.
Flight 93: 95% of the plane was found. It wasn't found in the first five minutes, but that hardly matters.
Pentagon: there is plenty of evidence of a plane crash.
Considering the fire department knew the WTC was going to collapse, due to intense fires in the building, any conspiracy steming from it is rather loony. 300+ firefighters died in the WTC, but they were concerned about them in building 7?
Common sense says NO conspiracy.
McHrozni 3 years ago
Well, if you choose to live in your world of unicorns and fairy dust, who am I to stop you?
So, when the same douche nobs, who did the 9/11 job, collapse the U.S. in economy in phase 2, don't say no one tried to get you to open your eyes.
I bid you a good day.
jbadyna 3 years ago
/watch?v=Q5im0Ssyyus
If evidence now means "unicorns and fairy dust", then I guess I'm living there. Feel free to enjoy your trip, and pay $7 for 0.50$ worth of 'non-profit' merchandise. :)
If the US economy doesn't collapse, will you keep believing into this nonesense?
McHrozni 3 years ago
mchrozni the economy has collapsed. So now what? you will continue to deny the truth. Shill or government hack. Either way you are a sick man.
johnknoefler 2 years ago
In Iceland, maybe, yes. But not in the rest of the world, not by a long shot. In fact, the ETA for recovery was pushed forward by about 6 months from the "optimistic" estimates from earlier this year.
McHrozni 2 years ago
ya right. You will be spouting off about economic recovery when you no longer have a dollar to spend.
johnknoefler 2 years ago
I don't have one, actually. Maybe a quarter coin stashed somewhere.
Euros are just as good, though.
Incidentally, why is the US unemployment under 10%, if the economy has supposedly already 'collapsed'?
McHrozni 2 years ago
since you use euros I find it very strange that you think you are an expert on matters here in the usa.
johnknoefler 2 years ago
Because you get your information from such drastically different channels than I do, right?
McHrozni 2 years ago
no. It's because I live here.
johnknoefler 2 years ago
Which means what, exactly?
Tell me, what relevant information do you have access to that I don't?
McHrozni 2 years ago
How's that imminent economic collapse coming, by the way? It's been 6 months, I see.
McHrozni 2 years ago
First off the jet fuel was gone in less that 30 seconds. There were explosions even before the first strike. There were obvious explosions 20 floors below the "pancake" zone. There were explosions on the "b" level that broke the ankles of people in the floor above. Cars in the b levels were tossed about and damaged and chunks of concrete were hurled about. Mchrozni we can all check your profile. You are a nobody.
johnknoefler 2 years ago
You're judging me based on my Youtube profile?
My, my, my, that's one big inflated ego you have there.
As for the rest, it's just the same bullshit we've been listening to for years now. None of it has been proven, or can be imagined in an remotely realistic scenario for that matter.
Perhaps we should introduce a new definition for bullshit -s (n): 9/11 Conspiracy theory, 9/11 Controlled demolition theory
McHrozni 2 years ago
I judge you from your comments and your profile. Since that is all the information available at the time. The real bullshit is what comes off your keyboard. It's symtomatic of what is going on in your mind.
johnknoefler 2 years ago
jbadyna, exactly right. Just drink your koolaid and shut up. The government loves us...
johnknoefler 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is gay, world trade center sucks, shudve burntt down anyway. fucking america is shit. fuck u america and goodbye
deathmetaler6666 3 years ago
9/11 was an Zionist Job (Mossad/CIA) for the Zionist New World Order. Wake up folks, that why it is NOT in the Zionist Mass Media, yes we know story Wars for Israel, blood for Oil and Wars on Peace.
BigWhoreHouseIsrael 3 years ago
how do people not see that its fake. 9/11. theres so much evidence prooving that the planes didnt actually take down the towers or even touch the pentagon
Rossfull 3 years ago
really? where is this evidence? Or are you confusing the word 'evidence' with blind faith?
whouster 3 years ago
watch the movie zeiteigst or somkething like that. and its around youtube. the towers were built to witstand blows like that unless they cut the inside structure diagonaly which in pictures of the rubble you see them in a diaggonal cut and then theres also the 3 explosions AFTER the planes crashed which witnesses reported from the basement. and in the pentagon this ones hard to explain search up 9/11 pentagon footage and go until you see a pic of a dude with glasses
Rossfull 3 years ago
People hearing explosions from the basement is hardly evidence (unless the lawyer is the same as OJ Simpson had). These towers were NOT built to withstand the impact of aircraft travelling at 450mph. NOBODY envisaged such a terrorist act taking place. It was a testiment to the architect that the towers didn't collapse immediately.
whouster 3 years ago
well i cant explain it right. look up 9/11 pentagon footage exposed and watch the movie zeighteist i think its called
Rossfull 3 years ago
I don't believe the official account of 9/11 anymore.
Let's forget about the towers and the numerous video's that appear to show spiral charges at the base of the building. Or any of the kookier stuff.
I have yet to hear a reasonable explanation for WTC 7's collapse. (1 page about it in the 9/11 report.)
Clinton Fellatio investigation = 36 million.
9/11 Investigation = 3 million.
Let's say the truthers are wrong, at least they are exposing the governments shitty investigation.
JimboTHC 3 years ago
I appreciate what you're saying Jimbo. The things that concern me are the more extreme conspiracy theories. As a Brit, I have plenty of reason to despise Bush and his administration, after our country was bullied into going into war in Iraq. I think it's crystal clear to everyone that whatever their view about 9/11, Bush used it as an excuse to go to war with whoever he chose. I hope he is brought to account someday.
whouster 3 years ago
Actually they were designed to withstand a plane crash. Do some damn research. There is overwhelming evidence supporting they could not have fell from fire.
Scared2Slavery 3 years ago
All goverments/media are in on it, this is the tip of a very big iceberg, it ends with the slaughter of what they term the useless eaters and the enslavement of those that are left. They tried to do it all at once but that failed so they are doing it in increments so peaple will not notice.
gox84 3 years ago
I advised u to check this shocking video: 9/11 conspiracy video alpha
jgmc987 3 years ago
take a look at 911 taboo by genghis6199. You can down a HQ full lenghth version, just follow the link on the "about this video"
support Ron Paul in 08 and get a new investigation and some real answers
trauts01 4 years ago
there were construction workers in the buildings before the attack, It shows that bush is with the terrorists, if the terrorists are terrorists, it may be his own terrorist organization. The planes were hijacked by terrorists from bushes terrorist organization, I suspect that. The pentagon alredy had bombs, they were detonated at the perfect time so the plane whould blow up and there whould be no proof. The planes were just a distraction for the bombs to go of.
harmeetunder8115 4 years ago 10
dick there are not terrorists they are masons what bush is ... is a fucking m,ason a satanist hes leading you to doom...!!!
kfl21 4 years ago
there is no way that the United States Government can explain away these explosions that are heard in this video as the buildings floor collpasing down on to each other although they will try.
maybe not today but someday the truth will be exposed.
rockerchick39 4 years ago
thanks i will
rockerchick39 4 years ago
check out farhenhtie 9/11
rockerchick39 4 years ago
rockerchick - check out loose change 911 and 911 mysteries - free documentaries you can watch on google video....extremely disturbing information
911REICHSTAG 4 years ago
this video should have 50,000 views.....have at it
trurevmbr07 4 years ago
fuck bush, we need to expose him
TheDifferential 4 years ago 8
Awesome clip! Absolute damning evidence there were explosives in the buildings! To the Congress, SILENCE IS COMPLICITY!!!!!!
JohnFromChicago 4 years ago