i want to be as good as you are...i own arturias Mini Moog and Prophet V VST's. i want to play Yazoo- Dont go on either one. please, can you provide the notes for the bass synth?
- great yazoo cover! - It would be nice to hear more electro pop/ synth pop demos of the evolver - everything else is just techno minimalism - but this is very very nice though.
good concept - like a mix between the old Roland Instrument/remote controller (PG-xxxx) and the Yamaha TX-816: up to 8 "no access" rack modules and one high quality desktop controller. so you have single independent voiceboards/outputs which are easy to service too. with USB you could easily arrange the voices:
unisono + detune, splits (free voice allocation), layers, cyclic or random voice allocation...
Not bad :) Listen to "Don't Go Replica" found on: unease. se / proone. htm
Made entirely on the Pro One.
Same VCOs as OB-Xa and later P5s. Love those gritty Oscillators.
I'd like to see a modern synth with very customizable digital envelopes, and full range, optionally keytracked, LFOs, and more complex than Matrix 12, but with discrete (like the good old ones) VCOs, VCFs and VCAs. And i think it's too inflexible with just one VCF. Should be at least lowpass + multimode.
thanks for the link - of course pro-one has VCOs + hardware envelopes instead of DCOs and software envs on the evolver - this makes evolver less raw & gritty but the (new) CEMs still give you good ole sequential sound ;)
I totally agree with you concerning the concept for a new quality synth:
VCO: discrete osc are best (my opinion) but expensive,
VCF: my favorite one is still a lowpass - highpass combination, both with resonance, like the one on cs-80.
I see no reason to use hardware envelopes today if they are 32bit/96KHz and has the flexibility of what you find in say Octopus or FM8 and down to micro second control. Every CC is 32bit and everything is exposed to Open Sound Control :)
Two multimodes (LP/HP/BP 12/24dB) would be ideal. I'm thinking SEM (+ extra OB-X saw) VCOs, and SEM and MOTM440 VCF. Google MOTM440 and listen to that beauty!
.. and of course single outputs, quality hardware (wood, metal) etc.
but the times for "best quality available" instruments are hard because of the high manufacturing costs. If retail price for a synth goes beyond 3.000 it's bad for today's business... thats the crux - you can't have high quality and low price at the same time. so, you always get what you pay for... but why a poly-monster? A no-compromise single voice would have best chances, and with multi-tracking you have true polyphony.. :)
It could be the same concept as Oberheim's x-voice, except expander modules will have no knobs or buttons. One "brain" module, and then tack on as many expander modules as you can afford or want. At least the digital part can be very powerful for little money now. I just listened to Studio Electronics CODE at novamusik. Amazing sound, but yes, it costs a lot! Maybe i'll settle for an ATC-X.
a few hints: evolver sounds punchier (for bass, leads...) when you plug the stereo out into two mono inputs on your mixer and center both channels (to my ears better than the internal mono-function). Most of the sounds use slow PWM... just tried to reduce the evolver to the pro-one concept :)
wow! that is good! very good... I need to learn to program my Evolver a bit better. There are so many possibilities that yet need to be revealed within this little blue box!
i want to be as good as you are...i own arturias Mini Moog and Prophet V VST's. i want to play Yazoo- Dont go on either one. please, can you provide the notes for the bass synth?
breakdancer1967 6 months ago
anybody now a place where one can download evolver presets?
astroboomboy 1 year ago
nice demo, realy ...
acidjack303 1 year ago
nice man
blissx 1 year ago
Nice pro-one emulation! can you share the Yazoo presets to my Evolver? thanks!
remixerone 1 year ago
- great yazoo cover! - It would be nice to hear more electro pop/ synth pop demos of the evolver - everything else is just techno minimalism - but this is very very nice though.
civ1 1 year ago
this is amazing you should make a full version
sloo7047 2 years ago
NICE!
Make it full and share the mp3 with us
thanks
sergiomcfly 2 years ago
thanks for your nice comment - it is a demo and the main sounds of the song are featured, so enjoy! :)
laubimusic77 2 years ago
lol kool
UnchainTheNight1 2 years ago
You should post the patches you made somewhere!
SidLuscious 2 years ago
good concept - like a mix between the old Roland Instrument/remote controller (PG-xxxx) and the Yamaha TX-816: up to 8 "no access" rack modules and one high quality desktop controller. so you have single independent voiceboards/outputs which are easy to service too. with USB you could easily arrange the voices:
unisono + detune, splits (free voice allocation), layers, cyclic or random voice allocation...
laubimusic77 2 years ago
Not bad :) Listen to "Don't Go Replica" found on: unease. se / proone. htm
Made entirely on the Pro One.
Same VCOs as OB-Xa and later P5s. Love those gritty Oscillators.
I'd like to see a modern synth with very customizable digital envelopes, and full range, optionally keytracked, LFOs, and more complex than Matrix 12, but with discrete (like the good old ones) VCOs, VCFs and VCAs. And i think it's too inflexible with just one VCF. Should be at least lowpass + multimode.
fleskebille 2 years ago
thanks for the link - of course pro-one has VCOs + hardware envelopes instead of DCOs and software envs on the evolver - this makes evolver less raw & gritty but the (new) CEMs still give you good ole sequential sound ;)
I totally agree with you concerning the concept for a new quality synth:
VCO: discrete osc are best (my opinion) but expensive,
VCF: my favorite one is still a lowpass - highpass combination, both with resonance, like the one on cs-80.
ENV: hardware envelopes rock! :)
laubimusic77 2 years ago
I see no reason to use hardware envelopes today if they are 32bit/96KHz and has the flexibility of what you find in say Octopus or FM8 and down to micro second control. Every CC is 32bit and everything is exposed to Open Sound Control :)
Two multimodes (LP/HP/BP 12/24dB) would be ideal. I'm thinking SEM (+ extra OB-X saw) VCOs, and SEM and MOTM440 VCF. Google MOTM440 and listen to that beauty!
fleskebille 2 years ago
Two unfiltered saws from my OB-SX: t i n y u rl. com/n6qke4
fleskebille 2 years ago
.. and of course single outputs, quality hardware (wood, metal) etc.
but the times for "best quality available" instruments are hard because of the high manufacturing costs. If retail price for a synth goes beyond 3.000 it's bad for today's business... thats the crux - you can't have high quality and low price at the same time. so, you always get what you pay for... but why a poly-monster? A no-compromise single voice would have best chances, and with multi-tracking you have true polyphony.. :)
laubimusic77 2 years ago
It could be the same concept as Oberheim's x-voice, except expander modules will have no knobs or buttons. One "brain" module, and then tack on as many expander modules as you can afford or want. At least the digital part can be very powerful for little money now. I just listened to Studio Electronics CODE at novamusik. Amazing sound, but yes, it costs a lot! Maybe i'll settle for an ATC-X.
fleskebille 2 years ago
novamusik. com/sounds/samonikallcode. empetre
fleskebille 2 years ago
Good work, very good video
sipe12 2 years ago
were the drum sounds also done on evolver???
sanjac1974 2 years ago
yes! ;-)
laubimusic77 2 years ago
this is VERY VERY VERY cool! well done!
gearjunkies 2 years ago
a few hints: evolver sounds punchier (for bass, leads...) when you plug the stereo out into two mono inputs on your mixer and center both channels (to my ears better than the internal mono-function). Most of the sounds use slow PWM... just tried to reduce the evolver to the pro-one concept :)
laubimusic77 2 years ago
wow! that is good! very good... I need to learn to program my Evolver a bit better. There are so many possibilities that yet need to be revealed within this little blue box!
loicthefrenchman 3 years ago
this just sells it for me, I love that pure analogue
HoweGavin 3 years ago
Great job. Really really close. Envelopes on orginal a bit snappier, but I'm impressed.
cthulufunk 3 years ago
good work
elsalvadoria 3 years ago