Why does everyone always say that Satnav needs Einstein's relativity to work ? I worked for navman for two years, and I can tell you that we used Pythagoras. Is it a conspiracy ?
Pythagoras requires three fixed points, which you don't have in GPS tracking. A satellite in space -- or a receiver high up -- is not moving at the same speed as a fixed point on earth. So, by the time it takes for the data to go up and come back down -- if the system considers everything on the same time scale, which it's not -- your orginal fixed point is now farther away. Relativity recalculates to account for this lag.
@dookdawg214 To work, the system needs three out of a number of satellites. All of them are moving, and often, so is the vehicle.
The light speed delay is inconsequential in comparison to the speed of movement of the four points, and the system adjusts accordingly. The satellites are really not that far away.
A predictive speed model for the vehicle is used either way, and this is the thing which requires the greatest adjustment.
@tonycatman It's because you are told to round off the errors. They are small for your purposes and can be discounted at your part of what you do.
Your calculations might be okay for calculating instantaneous position assuming instantaneous signal transmissions, but considering the distances and time for light to move as well as the movement of the Earth vs the movement of the satellite, that error becomes significant when calculating what position the sat will tell you.
@SavageJim01 Quick calc, then. How long do you think it takes for light to bounce from a geo-stationary satellite ? How far could a car travel in that space of time ? I reckon a max of 50 metres out, given the furthest satellite and max vehicle speed.
So you might adjust for the speed of light, but this is quite a different thing from acknowledging that the speed of light is a constant from every frame of reference, or using complex counterintuitive maths .
wait wait so you say shes walking in 3 kmph... not moving... since she is moving faster than 3 maybe not 6 but more than 3.. and while walking the other way she is moving 0.. but walking 3...
So what would happen if you ride a train moving at the speed of light, and you'd shoot a bullet towards the front of the train in the direction it is moving? What speed would the bullet have to someone standing next to the train?
@Timei well that depends on your frame (point of view) are you asking what would you see if you stood outside the train moving at 0 MPH releative to the train? ill answer a question with a question here ok.. what do you see at the firing range when sombody shoots a gun? answer... you cant see the bullet because its traveling to fast for your eyes to see. so what exactly are you asking? i dont mean to sound patronising btw.
@Timei yea thats why i posted again mate i thought it seemed a bit silly of me to ask that. its a good thought experiment as well and what i put after that is what i "think" would happen. i could be wrong though
the bullet would gain mass thus preventing it from breaking the speed of light, time would also slow down from the bullets point of view. the guy on the train firing the bullet would be the same as sombody at the fring range becuase the bullet and the man in the train would be traveling reletive to each other and to the man outside he would see the train, the man and the gun shrink in legth by a factor of 7 because of this the bullet would not have enough time/lenght th accelerate past light spd
if i am on an airplane that is going 100MPH and i turn on the headlights of the plane, it the light going faster than the speed of light on the ground?
@lamestbiokinectic Nope, everyone measures the same speed of light regardless of their speed, it has been experimentally discovered then Einstein based his theory on this experimental fact.
@ppsp3 If someone could turn on a flashlight while traveling at half the speed of light, it is not the speed of light plus half the speed of light. The beam would still only travel the speed of light. This is a prime example of what you are saying. I do not know how it would look though, I just know that the only thing that can travel faster than light is the expansion of space near the outer boundary of our known universe. Therefore we would never see the light from anything beyond that.
The walkway and truck examples are not completely perfect scientifically speaking.
because they would have to be tight shut like the car, so the air itself isnt moving aswell, air is a material and air resistance counts to that matter
magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king ... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists
So if I'm on a truck travelling at speed of light. And i throw a ball which goes at the speed of light. Than actually the ball flies at 2x speed of light. So faster than speed of light is possible.
Why is this labeled as Einstein's Theory of Relativity? It does not even touch his theory, except at the end where it says, that classical relativity does not work at high speeds. This should be "Classical Relativity Made Easy"
@0ester If you were stupid ... and you were going 60 mph in a car ... you will still be stupid. But others would perceive you as moving towards greater stupidity even faster.
this ll be amazing if didn't put sound effect and some 3d models vibrating every time they speak...this is really distracting ...... but other than that its good ..u just need to make more proportionally.. and please don't try to put every affect of whatever program ur using i had hard times keeping up .. thanks guys
Amazing video. Thank you what an awesome resource. I never had time to do this at college and I'm just getting into it now at 30. I did some math but would have loved to do this! Thanks again very clear
Technically the example with the truck is only really true within a vacuum. Air pressure would massively distort all the readings since you're moving through gasses.
@Skindoggiedog depends whether or not they are english, seeing as they invented the language then they can change it anytime they want.....without giving notice
@Skindoggiedog exactly that...i'm english so I can do what I WANT when I WANT with my langauge, you are simply a user and do not have that privilege, ok mr speak and spell?
Since relativity breaks down the faster something is going, what would be the overall speed of light that you shine from a flashlight pointing forward on an asteroid traveling at half the speed of light?
An atom or group of atoms will contract and expand EMR, projecting its own spacetime (time) at the square of the speed of light. This is why the speed of light is the same for all observers, and is not relative to the movement or the observer. Energy, mass and time are equivalent, they can only change form with each other. The Enfolding Waves of the Quantum Anti-matter Astral Light forms our thoughts and feelings and in turn forms our Unfolding Electron Out-waves. Enfolding/ Unfolding moments.
Einsteins equations for the contraction of space and time is not the end of time but rather the very beginning for each atomic Nuclei relative only unto itself from the very beginning! Matter is just space where it is very intense. Atomic Nuclei has to be wound up, before it can be unwound. The problem then with infinity is that it will only ever have the potential to exist at every point in space and at every moment in time. An atom or group of atoms will contract and expand EMR, projecting its
This is super awesome. I felt 10x smarter now :D I love the animations. I mean, why not? Animations in typical science videos are more to static, but in this video it's made interesting enough.
The only interesting I find is playing baseball on a truck! :D
I would like to argue that since they are playing at the back of the truck (open), the wind resistant will try to make itself noticeable ;)
Actually, the observer standing by the side of the road would have a tough time clocking the speed of the baseball due to the angle he is at versus the path of the ball. He would be clocking a very small velocity, not 150mph.
What if you were in a container moving so fast is was just short of the speed of light, and then you shot a bullet. Would the bullet move faster than the speed of light?
I am using this video to study for my science test on classical relativity and einstine's theory on this. I also need a good video that gives examples on the parodigm theory .. and I'm only in 6th grade. My life sucks.
common scence like all 'helpfull' physics, the advanced stuff is pointless no point to know that a rock 5 zilion light-years from us is moving faster than expected, big deal apply your efforts to somthing that will make a real difference to people. advanced theory is a waste of space that no human will ever experience you might as well write a paper on how you nerds will be shagging models models in the future as it has the same relevance and interst to 99.9% of regular peple here on earth.
Please guys, stop playing the "it's too difficult for you to understand" card, because it doesn't work anymore. There is no substance in this theory, it's not a theory for an elite of clever people, it's just a theory destined to be forgotten. Also why give credit to Einstein for the GPS? that's ridiculous.
@Bifolco2 I agree. Einstein didn;t creat the GPS, nor did he do anything to help. These people must be crazy to think einstine thought of this creation.
Time doesn't exist, exists only movement. If every atom stopped moving would you have time? No. Time is just a human idea to keep track of these atoms moving. That's why there is no substance in Relativity theory. If nobody can explain it with simple words after so many years there must be a reason why: there is nothing to understand. Einstein initially made a great discovery by proving the light bending effect during the eclipse. After that it was all media hype.
2. "...and which is taken in passing to and returning from the region diametrically opposite the pole over the earth’s surface with a mean velocity of about four hundred and seventy-one thousand two hundred and forty kilometers per second.” (ART OF TRANSMITTING ELECTRICAL ENERGY THROUGH THE NATURAL MEDIUMS, Nikola Tesla, USA Patent No. 787,412. Application May 16, 1900, patented April 18, 1905.)
1. “The most essential requirement is, however, that irrespective of frequency the wave or wave-train should continue for a certain interval of time, which I have estimated to be not less then one-twelfth or probably 0.08484 of a second..."
@IvanderHaisley I just love the response of someone who doesn't get my point. This title is misleading. And by the way, people watching this seem only to care about CGI babes.
you might want to explain einstein's theory a little in a video titled, "Einstein's Theory Of Relativity Made Easy " or you could just change the title to "Theory Of Classical Relativity Made Easy"
@DaFleegsta You came up with classical relativity when you were 9, which is pretty simple. When I first heard about Einstein's Relativity, I was all like; "Oh that's obvious." Until I realized what it really was.
@ediramaa - This can't be done in the theory of relativity. At low speeds ie much less than the speed of light, velocities can be added in the way this video explains. However, if a ball is thrown in a spaceship at 1/2 the speed of light and the spaceship itself is moving at 1/2 the speed of light, a stationary observer will measure the ball to be moving at 4/5 the speed of light according to relativistic velocity addition.
If you wish to see GOD particle, Higgs Boson see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA.FIT-lFuture Imaging tool or Certainty tool technology developed which is GOD Particle in Human body.Based on data in biometric or biosensor of both hands where FITtechnology has blue prints of future diasters like earthquake,nuclear radiation,tsunami,Dam burst ,Hurricane, KATRINA , 9/11 2001 WTC Tragedy, 26/11 2008 mumbai serial blast.scientist welcome to see and test FIT
so then why cant we achieve speed of light by making a machine that shots the next machine for an extra 50 mph, and then the next one another 50 mph until the last machine reaches the speed of light? does anyone get me?
if the obserer was driving at 30 mph and then truck then passes the observer as the pitcher throws the ball does thaat mean the observer would get 120 mph on his speed gun?
brilliant explantion will watch the other vids, but in my mind susan is a hot milf and sarah is a first time teen lesbian, seriously, the shit those two get up too defies belief let alone Einsteins theory, TIME FOR A WANK.
how can she still say she is moving at 3mph when she is not moving when an hour passes she wouldnt have walked 3 miles...sure she is moving her body as if she were moving 3mph but she actually wasnt moving 3 miles per hour
@crazyhairkid45 That's exactly the point the video is trying to make. She is moving over that conveyor belt at 3 mph. Say the conveyor belt was actually a continuous belt, then you'd be able to mark her start and end points, and the distance between the two would measure exactly 3 miles. So in fact, she DID walk at a speed of 3 mph. However, relative to the other girl outside the conveyor, she didn't move an inch during the whole hour. So it's RELATIVE.
This proves that we are moving at an approximate speed of 568000 mph at our current speed of time on earth. If we were to leave our universe and become motionless in a space ship at 0 mph, time on earth will stop (in our perspective but not to people still on earth). But the this hypothesis can't be proven true because time will not exist when we are not in motion away from earth. Therefore, disproving the existance of the hour, minute, second, millisecond, and microsecond at all.
Sarah just think's that so god damn hilarious, dosen't she.
HappyHouseFilms 1 day ago
CHANGE TO FUCKING METRIC SYSTEM! Considered guy from Serbia!
ogiugi96 3 days ago
my brain hurts.
godzillaleas 1 week ago
Sarah you slut
imasickkunt01 1 week ago
Why does everyone always say that Satnav needs Einstein's relativity to work ? I worked for navman for two years, and I can tell you that we used Pythagoras. Is it a conspiracy ?
tonycatman 1 week ago 2
@tonycatman
Pythagoras requires three fixed points, which you don't have in GPS tracking. A satellite in space -- or a receiver high up -- is not moving at the same speed as a fixed point on earth. So, by the time it takes for the data to go up and come back down -- if the system considers everything on the same time scale, which it's not -- your orginal fixed point is now farther away. Relativity recalculates to account for this lag.
dookdawg214 1 week ago
@dookdawg214 To work, the system needs three out of a number of satellites. All of them are moving, and often, so is the vehicle.
The light speed delay is inconsequential in comparison to the speed of movement of the four points, and the system adjusts accordingly. The satellites are really not that far away.
A predictive speed model for the vehicle is used either way, and this is the thing which requires the greatest adjustment.
tonycatman 1 week ago
@tonycatman It's because you are told to round off the errors. They are small for your purposes and can be discounted at your part of what you do.
Your calculations might be okay for calculating instantaneous position assuming instantaneous signal transmissions, but considering the distances and time for light to move as well as the movement of the Earth vs the movement of the satellite, that error becomes significant when calculating what position the sat will tell you.
SavageJim01 4 days ago
@SavageJim01 Quick calc, then. How long do you think it takes for light to bounce from a geo-stationary satellite ? How far could a car travel in that space of time ? I reckon a max of 50 metres out, given the furthest satellite and max vehicle speed.
So you might adjust for the speed of light, but this is quite a different thing from acknowledging that the speed of light is a constant from every frame of reference, or using complex counterintuitive maths .
tonycatman 2 days ago
this is the worst! just the worst!
MrH2hungry 1 week ago
GREAT EXAMPLE AIRPORT WALKWAY
MrLocoPictures 2 weeks ago
wait wait so you say shes walking in 3 kmph... not moving... since she is moving faster than 3 maybe not 6 but more than 3.. and while walking the other way she is moving 0.. but walking 3...
Drougar108 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
Tzs08 1 month ago
2:16 sea gypsy xD
TheOmegaozzy 1 month ago
So what would happen if you ride a train moving at the speed of light, and you'd shoot a bullet towards the front of the train in the direction it is moving? What speed would the bullet have to someone standing next to the train?
Timei 1 month ago
@Timei well that depends on your frame (point of view) are you asking what would you see if you stood outside the train moving at 0 MPH releative to the train? ill answer a question with a question here ok.. what do you see at the firing range when sombody shoots a gun? answer... you cant see the bullet because its traveling to fast for your eyes to see. so what exactly are you asking? i dont mean to sound patronising btw.
shua247 1 month ago
@shua247 No of course my question is hypothetical. I know it would be impossible to see the bullet.
Timei 1 month ago
@Timei yea thats why i posted again mate i thought it seemed a bit silly of me to ask that. its a good thought experiment as well and what i put after that is what i "think" would happen. i could be wrong though
shua247 1 month ago
the bullet would gain mass thus preventing it from breaking the speed of light, time would also slow down from the bullets point of view. the guy on the train firing the bullet would be the same as sombody at the fring range becuase the bullet and the man in the train would be traveling reletive to each other and to the man outside he would see the train, the man and the gun shrink in legth by a factor of 7 because of this the bullet would not have enough time/lenght th accelerate past light spd
shua247 1 month ago
Sarah's hot
budlarrybud 1 month ago
loves how me cant get it in his pocket
tj140898 1 month ago
@ScienceTV would it be alright if i used this video for my website
4752nathan 1 month ago
if i am on an airplane that is going 100MPH and i turn on the headlights of the plane, it the light going faster than the speed of light on the ground?
lamestbiokinectic 1 month ago
@lamestbiokinectic Nope, everyone measures the same speed of light regardless of their speed, it has been experimentally discovered then Einstein based his theory on this experimental fact.
ppsp3 1 month ago
@ppsp3 If someone could turn on a flashlight while traveling at half the speed of light, it is not the speed of light plus half the speed of light. The beam would still only travel the speed of light. This is a prime example of what you are saying. I do not know how it would look though, I just know that the only thing that can travel faster than light is the expansion of space near the outer boundary of our known universe. Therefore we would never see the light from anything beyond that.
RiaRadioFMHD773 1 month ago
i dont get why would any1 dislike it? is it because they dont understand? or they just want to be a jerk
coolboylikethat 1 month ago
what happens to relativity if the light isnt the fastest thing ?
CryADsisAM 1 month ago
@CryADsisAM it would be the same
coolboylikethat 1 month ago
5:12 haters gonna hate
jeenyus720 1 month ago
its awesome guys useful
TheDineshgm 1 month ago
were
TheDineshgm 1 month ago
Wow! Guys, Sarah is not real....she an animation....you are idiots to think she's real.
gynlo 1 month ago
@gynlo We never said she's real. We said she's hot ;)
ROhjklyuiop 1 month ago
@gynlo moron he knows that u idiot. that was sarcastic! -.-
MajinBabu 1 month ago
0:48 It's where zordon lives!!!
pablomurga 1 month ago
Is 'Sarah' really a guy..? Is that relative..?
kiwidecon 1 month ago
This guy has such an annoying voice..
HellaPerformance 1 month ago
The walkway and truck examples are not completely perfect scientifically speaking.
because they would have to be tight shut like the car, so the air itself isnt moving aswell, air is a material and air resistance counts to that matter
lpspgameplay 1 month ago
magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king ... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists
TESLA
goliat3333 2 months ago
Comment removed
TheBrownbongo 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So if I'm on a truck travelling at speed of light. And i throw a ball which goes at the speed of light. Than actually the ball flies at 2x speed of light. So faster than speed of light is possible.
AslanFatih92 2 months ago
Comment removed
AslanFatih92 2 months ago
Magnificent science.
Horrible video.
HottestKoolAid 2 months ago
I think you'll find, that it is actually Galileo's theory.
MADMANx511 2 months ago
Sarah is hot
Thuggin2222 2 months ago
3:12 Nice work Sherlock...
Nadeeja94 2 months ago
Can I get Sarah phone #
100027456 2 months ago
Einstein's third theory is so simple and easy to undestand but his theory of relativity is complex------- though intersting
fashionistajolly2010 2 months ago
Why is this labeled as Einstein's Theory of Relativity? It does not even touch his theory, except at the end where it says, that classical relativity does not work at high speeds. This should be "Classical Relativity Made Easy"
0ester 2 months ago 9
@0ester it is the introduction (ch 1)
DrillmanRulez 2 months ago
@0ester If you were stupid ... and you were going 60 mph in a car ... you will still be stupid. But others would perceive you as moving towards greater stupidity even faster.
alanspicertelecom 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@0ester This is Einstein's theory of relativity...I'm afraid you're mistaken.
Athrun000 6 days ago
1:00 "...within a few yards" you can tell this is old because they have apps on phones that are accurate within inches
jrw97 2 months ago
AHHHH THE GUY IN THE VIDEO IS TALKING TO ME!!!
aegisgfx 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this ll be amazing if didn't put sound effect and some 3d models vibrating every time they speak...this is really distracting ...... but other than that its good ..u just need to make more proportionally.. and please don't try to put every affect of whatever program ur using i had hard times keeping up .. thanks guys
TheFreako00 2 months ago
Comment removed
TheFreako00 2 months ago
Worst narrator ever
TheWtfnousername 2 months ago
Amazing video. Thank you what an awesome resource. I never had time to do this at college and I'm just getting into it now at 30. I did some math but would have loved to do this! Thanks again very clear
Mailme81 2 months ago
Oh for fuck's sake. I can't stand this narrator. He's terrible. Unsubscribed.
Skindoggiedog 2 months ago
Technically the example with the truck is only really true within a vacuum. Air pressure would massively distort all the readings since you're moving through gasses.
Vire70 2 months ago
i would bang sarah
olivertrask 2 months ago
The discovery of neutrinos being faster then the speed of light is a breakthrough discovery! This could prove Einstein's theory wrong!
stayeducated1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stayeducated1 "The discovery of neutrinos being faster then the speed of light is a breakthrough discovery!"
I wonder if they'll ever discover the difference between 'than' and 'then'.
Skindoggiedog 2 months ago
@Skindoggiedog depends whether or not they are english, seeing as they invented the language then they can change it anytime they want.....without giving notice
TheBrownbongo 1 month ago
@TheBrownbongo "they can change it anytime they want"
It wasn't a want.
It was ignorance over which word is normally used in that context.
"english, seeing as they invented the language"
Oh? What language was it they were speaking before English was 'invented'?
Skindoggiedog 1 month ago
@Skindoggiedog exactly that...i'm english so I can do what I WANT when I WANT with my langauge, you are simply a user and do not have that privilege, ok mr speak and spell?
TheBrownbongo 1 month ago
fuck your voice is anoying
eSkiad 3 months ago
@eSkiad Agree. Worst narrator ever.
Skindoggiedog 2 months ago
Physicists seem to have an unnatural penchant for snare drums.
TeaTimePhilosopher 3 months ago
that guy has a fucking annoying voice
roloug95 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@roloug95 "that guy has a fucking annoying voice"
I can't believe he's actually paid to speak.
I'd pay him not to.
Skindoggiedog 2 months ago
Sarah's freakin' hot!
1kakashi93 3 months ago 48
@1kakashi93 Susan>Sarah
matthewbbb1978 2 months ago
@1kakashi93 yah they definitely made that leg shot a little too sexual
7superjoe7 1 month ago
@1kakashi93 I scrolled down to see if anyone commented on Sarah. I knew it!
Timei 1 month ago
@1kakashi93 really? I found her dull and annoying...
hypedpotential 1 month ago
@1kakashi93 See, I'm more into Suzan.
MrTrda 3 weeks ago
there's no equation. this sucks! science is NOT for babies!!!!!!!!!!
MeinKleinerTiger 3 months ago
@RevolutionFist GTFO.... Take your politics elsewhere man...
KaylinJH 3 months ago
so are you trying to make yourself sound like jesus or something by that annoying echo effect in your voice? dislike that...
nyer070 3 months ago
The video starts at 00:30. Thumbs this up. For every person that clicks on my link, 30 seconds of an innocent person's life is saved.
DamionCrane 3 months ago 214
@DamionCrane How do you know it's 30 seconds to everybody? lol
peaceceman1199 1 month ago
@peaceceman1199 ...Because it's a prerecorded video?
BlueCosmology 1 month ago
@BlueCosmology nahh it's nothing
peaceceman1199 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BlueCosmology nahh it's nothing
peaceceman1199 1 month ago
@DamionCrane Relative to what ? ........
koenigsegg1337 1 month ago
@DamionCrane Starts at 00.34 infact ..
arjunvijaywargiya1 1 month ago
@DamionCrane It was too late for me.
slavzzzzz 1 month ago
4:22 I was actually learning something up to that point.
haupper 3 months ago
Since relativity breaks down the faster something is going, what would be the overall speed of light that you shine from a flashlight pointing forward on an asteroid traveling at half the speed of light?
FlargidyTV 3 months ago
@FlargidyTV The speed of light.
johnrcoben 3 months ago
Sarah's legs.
Watershed92 3 months ago 2
ONE OF THE WORLD'S FINE EST
sexyredztt 3 months ago
thanks that really helped, but then why does energy equal (planck standard x wavespeed) divided by wavelegnth?
danell12345 3 months ago
sarah has great ass
mozartnoyon 3 months ago
i heared about relativity when i was in 4th standard..............
aakash824 3 months ago
An atom or group of atoms will contract and expand EMR, projecting its own spacetime (time) at the square of the speed of light. This is why the speed of light is the same for all observers, and is not relative to the movement or the observer. Energy, mass and time are equivalent, they can only change form with each other. The Enfolding Waves of the Quantum Anti-matter Astral Light forms our thoughts and feelings and in turn forms our Unfolding Electron Out-waves. Enfolding/ Unfolding moments.
yoda6523 3 months ago
Einsteins equations for the contraction of space and time is not the end of time but rather the very beginning for each atomic Nuclei relative only unto itself from the very beginning! Matter is just space where it is very intense. Atomic Nuclei has to be wound up, before it can be unwound. The problem then with infinity is that it will only ever have the potential to exist at every point in space and at every moment in time. An atom or group of atoms will contract and expand EMR, projecting its
yoda6523 3 months ago
This is super awesome. I felt 10x smarter now :D I love the animations. I mean, why not? Animations in typical science videos are more to static, but in this video it's made interesting enough.
The only interesting I find is playing baseball on a truck! :D
I would like to argue that since they are playing at the back of the truck (open), the wind resistant will try to make itself noticeable ;)
Bearz314 3 months ago
This did explain the theory of relativity at all it just explained relative velocity.
adamr1994 3 months ago
@adamr1994 Relative Velocity is the very basis of Principle Relativity.
xXTheDeathReaperXx 3 months ago
Actually, the observer standing by the side of the road would have a tough time clocking the speed of the baseball due to the angle he is at versus the path of the ball. He would be clocking a very small velocity, not 150mph.
724element 3 months ago
Was that the 3D models from the Sims 2?...
Ashadow700 3 months ago
If you people say that einstein is dumb or retard then why is he famous and you're not ?
Pixius3 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ 2:30 I was waiting for "My Woman From Tokyo"..Damn
fiver69 4 months ago
Comment removed
fiver69 4 months ago
einstein=dumbass retard
wagz420 4 months ago
What if you were in a container moving so fast is was just short of the speed of light, and then you shot a bullet. Would the bullet move faster than the speed of light?
patters22 4 months ago
I am using this video to study for my science test on classical relativity and einstine's theory on this. I also need a good video that gives examples on the parodigm theory .. and I'm only in 6th grade. My life sucks.
bleachfan74185 4 months ago
common scence like all 'helpfull' physics, the advanced stuff is pointless no point to know that a rock 5 zilion light-years from us is moving faster than expected, big deal apply your efforts to somthing that will make a real difference to people. advanced theory is a waste of space that no human will ever experience you might as well write a paper on how you nerds will be shagging models models in the future as it has the same relevance and interst to 99.9% of regular peple here on earth.
derwall2005 4 months ago
sara got some thighs ...
snaht1 4 months ago
Please guys, stop playing the "it's too difficult for you to understand" card, because it doesn't work anymore. There is no substance in this theory, it's not a theory for an elite of clever people, it's just a theory destined to be forgotten. Also why give credit to Einstein for the GPS? that's ridiculous.
Bifolco2 4 months ago
@Bifolco2 I agree. Einstein didn;t creat the GPS, nor did he do anything to help. These people must be crazy to think einstine thought of this creation.
bleachfan74185 4 months ago
I agree.
bleachfan74185 4 months ago
Time doesn't exist, exists only movement. If every atom stopped moving would you have time? No. Time is just a human idea to keep track of these atoms moving. That's why there is no substance in Relativity theory. If nobody can explain it with simple words after so many years there must be a reason why: there is nothing to understand. Einstein initially made a great discovery by proving the light bending effect during the eclipse. After that it was all media hype.
0chappell 4 months ago
the coin moved a little
IvanderHaisley 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2. "...and which is taken in passing to and returning from the region diametrically opposite the pole over the earth’s surface with a mean velocity of about four hundred and seventy-one thousand two hundred and forty kilometers per second.” (ART OF TRANSMITTING ELECTRICAL ENERGY THROUGH THE NATURAL MEDIUMS, Nikola Tesla, USA Patent No. 787,412. Application May 16, 1900, patented April 18, 1905.)
klopedokle 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. “The most essential requirement is, however, that irrespective of frequency the wave or wave-train should continue for a certain interval of time, which I have estimated to be not less then one-twelfth or probably 0.08484 of a second..."
klopedokle 4 months ago
Rubbish video. This is an introduction to the debunking of classical relativity, NOT einstein's theory of relativity.
RandomCoked 4 months ago
@RandomCoked hey condomcoked!!!! youfuck ass!!! dont comment if you dont like the video okay ?
IvanderHaisley 4 months ago
@IvanderHaisley I just love the response of someone who doesn't get my point. This title is misleading. And by the way, people watching this seem only to care about CGI babes.
RandomCoked 4 months ago
stupid music
bargainairre 4 months ago
Did Matthew McConaughey do the voice-over?
IamEmEmIam 4 months ago
After reading all your comments on Sarah I couldn't wait to see her. I felt a little disappointed when I realized she was computer generated.
dait1986 4 months ago
you might want to explain einstein's theory a little in a video titled, "Einstein's Theory Of Relativity Made Easy " or you could just change the title to "Theory Of Classical Relativity Made Easy"
absurdstranger 4 months ago
@absurdstranger or he might want to change it to "human insane religions"
ZeroHumans 4 months ago
Sooo is this sarah availble for dating..?
kadmany 4 months ago
well duh.... sooo who gives a shit?
RickyRollzz 4 months ago
Susan walks like she has a potato chip in her ass
MrJP2003 4 months ago
I think they're making a bigger deal out of what happened at CERN than will be the case once all the data is out.
ByRecentDesign 4 months ago
Thanks!
TheRYAN045 5 months ago
@RevolutionFist actually Einstien was a theist at most
deepmouse123 5 months ago in playlist More videos from ScienceTV
@deepmouse123 He wasnt a Theist, Deist, or Atheist. The closest belief Einstein could be entitled with is pantheist.
harlemhustla145 4 months ago
haha this could be wrong
shasanain 5 months ago
aaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrgggggggghhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!
smoothkracker 5 months ago
but they just told in the news that einstein might be wrong O.o
MeNotyouxD 5 months ago
4:43 = HOT legs. ;)
yash291294 5 months ago
id like to bend Sarah over that walkway rail
axa88888888 5 months ago
Check this out!!! Obama Time travels to see JFK
cruisersism 5 months ago
pff i came up with this theory when i was like 9
DaFleegsta 5 months ago 36
@DaFleegsta
lol but can you derive time dilation and space curve in addition with lorenz factor from this simple concept of relativity?
what makes einstein's version of relativity from your kid's version is the ability to see beyond the surface
superdahoho 4 months ago
@superdahoho No, but one time I sneezed in my chocolate milk and then used my friend Billy's fruit roll up to pull out the snot.
DaFleegsta 4 months ago
@DaFleegsta
I'd totally feed that fruit roll to billy
superdahoho 4 months ago
@DaFleegsta You came up with classical relativity when you were 9, which is pretty simple. When I first heard about Einstein's Relativity, I was all like; "Oh that's obvious." Until I realized what it really was.
It's not this.
EntrophyZone 3 months ago
@DaFleegsta
I came up wid this when i was in 3rd grade. :)
A1kumar92 3 months ago
@ediramaa - This can't be done in the theory of relativity. At low speeds ie much less than the speed of light, velocities can be added in the way this video explains. However, if a ball is thrown in a spaceship at 1/2 the speed of light and the spaceship itself is moving at 1/2 the speed of light, a stationary observer will measure the ball to be moving at 4/5 the speed of light according to relativistic velocity addition.
gunnunator 6 months ago
4:45 damn i would hit that anytime!
Phokya0 6 months ago
If you wish to see GOD particle, Higgs Boson see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA.FIT-lFuture Imaging tool or Certainty tool technology developed which is GOD Particle in Human body.Based on data in biometric or biosensor of both hands where FITtechnology has blue prints of future diasters like earthquake,nuclear radiation,tsunami,Dam burst ,Hurricane, KATRINA , 9/11 2001 WTC Tragedy, 26/11 2008 mumbai serial blast.scientist welcome to see and test FIT
vksonakia@yahoo.co.in
unified field scientist
India
vksonakia 6 months ago
so then why cant we achieve speed of light by making a machine that shots the next machine for an extra 50 mph, and then the next one another 50 mph until the last machine reaches the speed of light? does anyone get me?
ediramaa 6 months ago
ok quick question
if the obserer was driving at 30 mph and then truck then passes the observer as the pitcher throws the ball does thaat mean the observer would get 120 mph on his speed gun?
if that makes sense
otispowell2 6 months ago
brilliant explantion will watch the other vids, but in my mind susan is a hot milf and sarah is a first time teen lesbian, seriously, the shit those two get up too defies belief let alone Einsteins theory, TIME FOR A WANK.
vitterpup 6 months ago
the "music" sucks big time
vafant 6 months ago 12
@vafant Your here for the music? FYI this isn't a music video.
Chulpasa 3 months ago
@Chulpasa It spoils the beauty of science
vafant 3 months ago
@vafant Very true
Chulpasa 3 months ago
@vafant not all of it.
noelsoong777 3 months ago
Jesus created all this =]
TG070 6 months ago
@TG070 No. lol
OWLCITY54 6 months ago
how can she still say she is moving at 3mph when she is not moving when an hour passes she wouldnt have walked 3 miles...sure she is moving her body as if she were moving 3mph but she actually wasnt moving 3 miles per hour
crazyhairkid45 6 months ago
@crazyhairkid45 That's exactly the point the video is trying to make. She is moving over that conveyor belt at 3 mph. Say the conveyor belt was actually a continuous belt, then you'd be able to mark her start and end points, and the distance between the two would measure exactly 3 miles. So in fact, she DID walk at a speed of 3 mph. However, relative to the other girl outside the conveyor, she didn't move an inch during the whole hour. So it's RELATIVE.
kroaal 6 months ago
@kroaal ahhh got it yeah i understood the other examples but ok i gotcha thx
crazyhairkid45 6 months ago
i just had a wank over 4:43...
FeedMoi 6 months ago
my brain is damage , I can't still figure this out.
klickkzam 6 months ago
I was sleepy until 4:23. hehe
BigLikeTheSun 6 months ago
I felt like I was 8 years old and watching Discovery Channel all day once more. Congratulations on such well put video!
Meoiswa 6 months ago
i hate this mans voice...
JohnnyP8one 6 months ago
relativity is meaningless. reverse it. meaningless.
nothadnotbad 6 months ago
Sopwith Camel...Biplane of choice of Snoopy vs Red Barron!
mnzamaggie 7 months ago
Sarah has some boner inducing legs. Quite distracting me from watching this.
Spyez 7 months ago
4:24 She's HOT!
teo5151 7 months ago
this is not accurate.
anonymousnumberx 7 months ago
This proves that we are moving at an approximate speed of 568000 mph at our current speed of time on earth. If we were to leave our universe and become motionless in a space ship at 0 mph, time on earth will stop (in our perspective but not to people still on earth). But the this hypothesis can't be proven true because time will not exist when we are not in motion away from earth. Therefore, disproving the existance of the hour, minute, second, millisecond, and microsecond at all.
O0oXxLladnarxXo0O 7 months ago