Added: 3 years ago
From: roundhouser
Views: 15,341
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • EMD COPY CATS 4 STROKE IS A GE THING AND I HEARD EMD 4 STROKE DID NOT DO GOOD FOR THEM LIVE THE 4 STROKE TO GE AND EMD 2 STROKE

  • Ahh..yes. The chugging of a four cycle prime mover. Makes me think of the alco's I work on.

  • Man, the 265H sounds like an ALCo 244... 8D

  • one of the big reasons the 6000 hp locomotive wasn't further developed by GE and EMD was that the railroads themselves found that it was too much horsepower to be flexible in making up trains. They were finding that many trains needed only 7-9,000 hp and putting 2 6,000 hp locos on the lead was a waste. and trains only needing 5500 hp and puting just one loco on it lead to concerns of what happens if there is a problem. The train is then stalled on the main blocking traffic.

  • @BudmanPackfan amazing how the 4 stroke 265 still had a hint of the EMD 2 cycle "thump" to it. :)

  • @BudmanPackfan Also as I understand it, it doesn't have enough weight on wheels to fully utilize that 6,000 hp.

  • @JetMechMA That is correct. What a shame! Only seen a few in operation. Most of them were not even on the UP!

  • The H engine was a good engine But being a new engine things are going to go wrong . improvements general motors was not going to invest in. remember this was build around the time gm wanted to sell emd. China now uses them in there locomotives. 300 brand new h engines.

  • From a long time here in europe using 4 stroke engines. Prover rentability and fouel consuption and they avesome horsepower.

  • love that sound sitten still or 70 mph i remember when my dad had 8 of those hooked up dont remember hp but lots of power he was 45 years with katy 2 with up

  • Nothing like the knocking sound of 710.

  • The 6000 horsepower EMD H engine was a piece of crap, thats why UP and CP retired them all.

  • GEVO hasn't proved superior.

  • Yeah it sucks that they weren't more successful. Every new locomotive is going to have its problems. Personally I think they were introduced before the industry was ready for them. Right now the limit for successful locomotives seems to be 4000-4400 hp. Maybe in the future there will be a place for 6000 hp locomotives.

  • make ya sad though that UP is getting rid of them...

  • Not if you have to ride in them on a constant basis. They are very uncomfortable rides.

  • THey are?? i've wondered why i've seen so few... why are they? Maybe they aren't cost effective or not good in train yards because of their length..

  • that is an sd90H since she has the 265 H engine inside her.

  • Hehe, GE are all 4 cycle engines, and EMD are 2 cycle engines, except the 710,265-H engine!

  • It's 16V265H. The 710 is a two stroke, the 265 is a 4 stroke.

  • 16V-710 265-H Engine! 4cycle EMD!! great sound!!

  • I wondered why they sounded so different, are GE prime movers 4 cycle as well?

  • GE's are all 4 cycle. EMD's except the 265-H which you just heard are all 2 cycle.. The 710G is NOT 4 cycle!

  • Yes.

  • Seems weird to hear an EMD chugging like a GE.

  • @enr3870 Really wish that EMD could have added 4 more cylinders to the 20V710...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more