Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (163)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • all this thermite, and yet rescue workers were able to go on top of the rubble. Debunked retards.

    all this thermite and bodies didn't vaporize, same with with the thousands of body parts. Debunked retards.

  • Does anyone know where i can find the documents made by the scientists that apparently found termite in the tower.

  • It's clear from the title that whoever wrote it has no understanding of science.

  • the truth is not a theory

  • UH UH were out of time

  • Dr Steven Jones proved Jesus Christ traveled to America and that 9/11 was an inside job, great man... loooooool

  • The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos."

    -- H.L. Mencken

  • email wiki founder about the propoganda he has on his wtc website, he still supports office fires as the collapse of the 3 towers

  • I think thermite was in a airplane.

  • You guys realize they left out the part about all this evidence being found AFTER the clean up crew started using THERMITE charges to cut the debris down to smaller sizes to be moved right? They did this INTENTIONALLY. These people firmly believe the WTC was an inside job. So much so that they are incapable of accepting any evidence to the contrary and will flat out LIE to you to convince you to believe as they do. They don't care about the facts or the truth... just getting you on their side.

  • @MrAwsome514 um dickwad they absolutely did not use thermite for the cleanup...lol..you moron..they used torches and cables to pull the remaining damaged structures down..know your facts before you spew bullshit lies..EXPLOSIVES BROUGHT DOWN ALL 3 WTC TOWERS ON 9/11..IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!

  • There is a third truth. Please watch my video "The Nuclear Demolition of the WTC Pulverisation and Vaporisation"

  • @SirJiggady you mean like during the 36hr powerdown - the only one the building ever had - 3 days before sept 11. im not really keen on people coming to conclusions but there are some things that need to be answered

  • The complete loss of OXYGEN alone from all of the dust and cement debris would have put out the fire! Honestly people this is grade school physics lol! no

    OXYGEN = NO FIRE! But yet you dont hear much about the lack of oxygen under all 3 to 6 inches of dust! let alone several million pounds of debris and dust!

  • None of serious researches into 9/11 fraud should start without analyzing the fake 9/11 TV broadcasts (Watch "September Clues").

    You let the white-collar criminals off the hook and go after blue-collar technicians, who did the dirty work. This is how the truth movement is being hijacked by CointelPro.

    Meanwhile, crooks continue what they started, and when they are done, you will not be able to utter a single word of dissent.

    "What good is a phone call, Mr. Anderson, if you unable to speak?"

  • this whole demonlish therory is crap.1 to prepare a buliding for demonlish take months. u have to clearly all the concrete on each support beam.as each beam needs to be pre cut and rigged with explosives.2 yes thermite can cut thourgh steel but u need ton of the stuff.also magisuim ribbon is used in to ignite the thermite. also i have rumour thermite was mixed with paint this cannot happens as chemical in the paint effect the ignitation of thermite

  • @Cliffjumper24. If you just rig the whole building, then it doesn't matter where you hit it. The sections of rigged building, that the jets hit are rendered useless. Hence unused thermite. Fire alone will not make thermite react. (speculating) A person sits and waits, sees where the damage is at, then can determine where to start the process of weakening and then demoing the building.

  • Once one, eliminates all possibilities. What ever is left, no matter how out landish or unreal, is the truth.

    Sherlock Holmes.

  • I was told that if a worker spraying this stuff thought he was painting or spraying insulation. Wouldn't know the difference and would be none the wiser. Also to set it off, you don't need magnesium strips or caps ect. It requires nothing more than what appears to be phone line, even fiber optic cable, basically stuff you would find in an office buildings wiring looms. Is that how they did it? I dunno, but it sounds plausible.

  • Besides a gov't smart enough and efficient enough to demo those buildings, wouldn't be stupid enough to leave that kind of evidence behind. You can't have it both ways. I know army core of engineer person. Nanothermite/superthermite is real and can be sprayed on like paint or even in a expanding foam type.

  • Just sayin, you can't through in some random Pictures and say "look 45 degree cuts, that's how they do it when they bring buildings. Inside job"!!! Do some research. There are pictures of cutting crews going around and bringing down still standing steel. I just want the truth. I think persons within our govt did/let it happen. No "cave men" did this.

  • Debunked!

    Do you realise where the Thermite suggestion comes from?

    They found red flakes of Iron Oxide in the debris of both the twin towers and WTC7.

    But guess what else iron oxide is used in?

    Paint!!

    Yep, many primers use iron oxide for the pigment.

    Now, what's more likely to be found in a building?

    Thermite or paint?

    The simplest explanation tends to be the truth.

    If there's a conspiricy, why bother with planes, just demolish them and blame your terrorist of choice!

  • @Cliffjumper24 Explosive paint?? You're a fucking idiot! There was unreacted thermite chips found in the dust. Do you really think scientists from around the world are 'conspiring' to find thermitic material in dust samples??  You're a kook to believe in crazy conspiracy theories like that. Yeah, 2 planes bring down 3 skyscrapers. What a dumb ass. And I guess there's no need to spend millions to demolish buildings because all you have to do is light random office fires.

  • @sjtsnow No no, you don't uderstand.... I'm arguing it's NOT thermite (and certainly not explosive paint).

    Yeah, in the debris there was some iron oxide flakes found, and there was aluminium too.

    Although they may be ingredients that is also found in thermite, that doesn't mean it could ONLY be thermite.

    It's like saying they found flour, eggs and water in a kitchen, which means there's absolute proof of a plan to bake a cake! Heh heh!!

  • @sjtsnow I don't believe any of the conspiracy nonsense.... it's just too complicated to be a workable plot.

    You'd have to plant explosives without it being noticed

    Get planes to hit the point where the explosives are without damaging the trigger mechanisms (wires or radio receivers)

    And you'd have to make sure that one of the towers hit WTC 7 and cause enough damage and fires for a collapse.

    It's impossible to gurantee success... yet truthers are hung up on the idea of controlled demolition

  • @Cliffjumper24 It's called a controlled demolition for a reason dipshit. It's pointless to debate you because you lack the intellectual curiosity and intelligence to actually think about these claims. Go back to sleep retard.

  • @sjtsnow

    if its a controlled demolition, than building 3 wouldn't have collapsed

  • @sjtsnow Maybe you lack the intellectual curiosity to think of anything BUT a conspiricy.

    It's not very 'controlled' when too many things can go wrong.

    If there's a conspiracy to do a controlled demolition, keep it simple.... plant charges, take down the buildings and fabricate evidence to blame whoever you want.

    Pretty logical.

    You don't need planes to make this work.

  • @Cliffjumper24

    You do if you want to blame "Terrorists"

  • @AdventGroupRs Which is is implausable (if not impossible) to achieve with a degree of certainty.

    To use the old Sherlock Holmes quote"...when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

    There's no controlled demolition.

    The terrorists achieved what was improbable.... a dreadful strike on two New York buildings, with collateral damage on buildings around them, and putting fear in minds across the world.

  • @Cliffjumper24 sure... this is what goverment tells... hahahahahahahaahahahahahahahah­ahahahahahha... ur good at copying goverments lies

  • @sjtsnow 1.) Thermite doesn't explode... 2.) Just because you call people names doesn't make your argument true. 3.) Fact, Thermite is a mixture of aluminum and steel. If you crash aircraft aluminum into a steel building and have it blended with an ignition source, I.E. jet fuel, you get a slow burn... NOT an explosion. Perhaps you should have at least read something about thermite before you spoke... That way you don't appear in front of 15k+ viewers as someone who is uninformed

  • @Cliffjumper24 all theree buldings vere controled demolition... /watch?v=ffs7PkOREEY&feature=c­hannel_video_title

  • @zelenko2

    how about the other 2 buildings were they controlled demo too?

  • @zelenko2 That's little more than a '6 degrees of separation' of the industrial world.

    Doesn't answer the question of how a complicated unworkable plot is achieveable when you introduce planes.

    There are better ways to achieve what the Truther movement consider the motive (Iraqi oil).

  • @Cliffjumper24 man they just needed the 911 to happen... the proffited even from exploding the three towers... dumb asshole... u know nothing about todays world... its a fucked up one... how many questions have been unanswered... becouse of people like u... fuckers in power get richer and richer... its todays world... 911 changed the view on world... u know...

  • @Cliffjumper24 this terorrism fighting decade... bullshit... now its 10 years after 911... i think they will do something to atack iran... just wait for it to happen

  • @sjtsnow

    No idiot, you fly a plane into a building to demolish it, not set a fire.

  • @taledarkside Wow, I missed seeing a plane hit building 7. You're a fucking retard!

  • @sjtsnow

    WTC hit building 7 and WTC 3 dumbfuck.

    notice how dumb conspiracy theorists like you don't talk about WTC 3 collapsing? i wonder why?hiding truth about physics.

  • @sjtsnow Not explosive paint..... just normal paint with red oxcide mixed in (as most primers are).

    It's NOT thermite.

    There are lots of other things that have the same properties of the flakes found in the debris.... thermite is only one of them.

    If you investigate a kitchen and find the components to bake a cake, does that mean the only thing you can do with those is making cakes?

    Couldn't someone make bread too?

    Or pancakes?

  • @Cliffjumper24 well mr. brainwashed... there were found unreacted nanothermite chips (specially produced and used in USA military) and the product of thermitic reaction... i mean what else do u need than a special USA military explosive in middle of new yourk... people are just blind

  • @zelenko2

    thermitic reactin causes 4,000F. temperature. human remains turn to dust in 2,000F degrees. they found human remains

    keep being a dumb puppet for the 911 conartistleades.

    LOL thermite, thermite is so hot, yet, nothing vaporized that day. idiots

  • @taledarkside how do u know nothing vaporised... i mean they removed everything as fast as they could... hmmmmm inst that suspicious... isnt that removal of evidence... there were alowed only fema who was in total control of goverment.... hmmmmmm... nobody else was permited to go in.... unanswered questions to victims families... a lot lot lot lot of things were not clarified...

  • @zelenko2

    because they removed human bodies which didn't vaporize

    yup, them removing stuff from gound zero for the last 10 years was really fast. yup thats suspecious, 10 years of removing debry

    they found molten "METAL" not steel dumbfuck. if there was molten steel, it would have vaporized all the human remains which it didn't.

  • @taledarkside so steel isnt metal???????????????... hahahahahahahahahaha... there was flowing liquid steel as the police officers said... and alot of others... nist OFCOURSE denied... hmmmmm

  • @zelenko2

    steel is metal, but steel wasn't molten because it would have vaporized human remains.

    there are other metals that are molten at 1000F degrees which was in the WTC. I guess you believe everything that is fed to you. LOL

  • @taledarkside how do u know there werent vaporized human remains... everything was covered up... we now nothing about 911... exept the lie about terrorists... everything was not discused and not answered

  • @zelenko2

    10,000 body parts were removed from ground zero by fire fighters. if your lying leader richard gage and the others, claim there was thermite which burns at 4000 degrees and body parts vaporize at 2000 degrees. There would be no body parts at all removed from the WTC.

    keep being a dumb sheep because conartists like gage are selling you a lie to get rich. simple science and you close your eyes to it

  • @taledarkside the never found all bodies... 10,000 is just a number given from goverment... fuck the counting of parts u cant relie on this... watch the evidence... thermite... explosions... big bams... pod under the planes... hijackers alive... pentagon plane does not fi the hole... flight 93 crash was total lie no body parts, no plane parts, nothing at all just some small pices of garbage... a lot of witnesses telling about bombs going off... i mean what else do u need

  • @zelenko2

    10,000 is also given on truther websites

    they found bodies. which proves there were no 4,000F degree thermite or 3,000 degree molten steel, because it would have vaporized human remains.

    i know, you truthers hate science and actual evidence that science backs up

  • @taledarkside /watch?v=lv2ck2qsiGA&feature=r­elated

  • @taledarkside i say things that existed... i dont back up things that could be made up...

  • @zelenko2

    thats means there was no thermite because they found body parts. simple science involving temperature data.

  • @taledarkside fuck the body parts... they found some... but there was thermite

  • @zelenko2

    yup exactly, they found some body parts which was never vaporized. strange how something doesn't vaporize , oh wait, there were no 4000 degree temperature.

    let me know how 2000 degree difference exists leaving no scientific evidence

  • @zelenko2

    witnesses also said a plane went into the pentagon.

    so people that crashed into the WTC in the plane are still alive ROFL, fucking funny

  • @taledarkside did u watch the video... /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k&feature=c­­hannel_video_title

  • @taledarkside what do u say about the pod under the planes that crashed into towers ???? .... there should be nothing under the plane if it was really a TERORRIST atack

  • @taledarkside 10 years of removing debrie... the removed the steel with numerous of trucks... even the USA military was helping for faster removal of evidence... clearly a cover up... and instead to put the steal for investigation... they transported it to china inmediatly...... hmmmmmm

  • @zelenko2 it was some months not 10 years

  • @zelenko2

    10 years retard. and if you claim months, that isn't considered "fast" either. funny how you repeat the same bullshit lik the other sheep for ae911truth

  • @taledarkside so u say that the remains were being removed for 10 years?????

  • @taledarkside there is a video blowing a man through window before collapse... hmmmmmmm

  • @zelenko2 Richard Jones claims that the molten metal falling from the south tower a few minutes before it fell was sign of a thermite reaction taking place, because the temeratures weren't hot enough to melt steel.

    But steel doesn't need to melt for the towers to fall, just be heated up enough (600C) to weaken it by 50%... and the temperatures were higher than that.

    I'm not a chemist, or a physicist, I'm not qualified to answer all the questions.

    But as a logical person, the question is why?

  • @Cliffjumper24 well there was molten steel found... there should not be found any thermite and molten steel... but unforetunately there wre planty of them

  • Why the planes?

    Once the planes are removed from the equasion, then a conspiricy is quite plausable.

    But when you introduce an airliner suicide attack, the whole controlled demolition theory makes no sense.

    Too many thngs can go wrong.... therefore it's not at all 'controlled'.

    Loose Change was started up as a laugh.... yet it's the Truther bible and the movement a religion.

    I'm not interested in trying to change someones religion.

    Belive what you want to... no matter how deluded.

  • @Cliffjumper24 without the planes it wouldnt be so chaotic... and by the way the planes were switched in the air... the planes that crashed into the towers were drones... they had pods atached ... pods are clearly seen in many videos... operation NORTHWOODS was years ago and was also a plane switch on teh air... so it was not the first time to control planes from distance

  • @Cliffjumper24 the hijackers are still alive... they were cia agents... cia assets... they really hijacked planes... but then we have a "coincidence"... all planes were for more than half a hour out of radar (there wer the switches taking place)... so basiclly for bette image watch... /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k&feature=c­hannel_video_title ... and this... /watch?v=5XPEz0d1rWI&feature=c­hannel_video_title

  • thermite is hot enough to vaporize body parts. Yet, they found 20,000 body parts and numerous bodies at ground zero.

    oh that would mean there was no exothermic reactions from thermite using scientific reasoning basd on temperature evidence

  • 10 years later, this evidence is STILL undeniable. jamisturb0 is either lying about being an engineer or lying about the evidence.

  • Comment removed

  • The Govt is controled by the ILLUMINATIE thats why they do what there told. Illuminatie made trillions off the War that proceded. Its about money , that what all this is about. Its simple. Money runs the world . $ , this was nothing but cash ! The people who made the money want to cover up the truth. The two pilots who were training in Florida 20 miles were i was staying were known terrorist from Afghanastan,KNOWN! Bin Laden was seen at Military Hospital by FBI agents. Go FIGURE! LEE HARVEY OSW

  • Isn't it possible, that the last photos with the 45 degree cuts, were taken after a crew came in an cut down the columns after the collapse?

  • @slauertura77 no, cutting the beams straight across is alot shorter cut. cutting beams on a 45 makes sense when the beams are supporting the building because it helps to move them out of the way. They SLIDE off each other so to speak. once the beams are just standing on their own it's faster to cut straight across. if you cut a 2x4 straight across it's a 3 1/2 inch cut. If you cut a 2x4 at a 45 it's going to be roughly a 4 3/4 inch cut. the quickest way to cross a road is straight across.

  • @mxdave91

    And on 9/12 you an see a about 10 floors of the outer structure still standing. no beams were ever cut

  • @taledarkside thats my point. No rescue workers cut any of these visable beams down. All the 45 cuts came from the thermite that caused the original collapse. you have coutless reports of molten metal along with satelite pictures proving this. you also have pulverized concrete and melted steel fused together. any firefighter will tell you that national code is when you have the above listed you test for explosives or accelerants yet NIST says they never tested because it was unlikely. Please....

  • @mxdave91

    rescue workers didnt cut any beams. Steel workers did. And There were no cut beams because 10 floors of the outer structure was still standing. Did you miss that part in reading?

    yes, there was molten metal, but not molten steel. huge difference in science. And if NIST havn't tested, they can test hundreds of beams which are still stored in a plane hanger in New York. Something that Richard gage hasn't done yet or anyone from the truth movement. test the steel beams.

  • bush is a murder and got away with it

  • @darydenechick it goes a lot deeper than bush

    besides cheny new more than he did

  • wow look at the huge lava type matter exploding all over the place. Which you NEVER seen in the WTC.

    911truth, a big fraud industry where the video makers are cashing in at 70,000 dollars a year

  • @taledarkside whered you hear that the media? good stuff

  • @jamisturb0

    I'm an engineer. easy to debunk leaders of the 911truth when they use 3rd grade science to fool stupid people like yourself.

  • @taledarkside /watch?v=ffs7PkOREEY&feature=c­hannel_video_title

  • @zelenko2

    LOL a warcrime911 video. that guy is a fraud, and has no clue about physics. If you knew anything, you wouldn't have to have warcrime talk for you. dumb conspiracy theorists

  • @taledarkside prove wrong something that is in that video... can u?

  • Ok we have tons of evidence now, Operation Northwoods, Project for a New American Century, Iraqi Liberation Act, No planes at the Pentagon or Shanksville PA, and thermate explosives at WTC, 1,2 and 7. The next step is pin-point who did it, and if any one says Usama bin Laden did it from a cave in Afghanistan, they obviously suffer from low intellegence or they are part of the trail which will lead to those who actually orchestrated the terrible deed. Lawyers it is time to act!

  • I see no way, the government controls...everything. The 9/11 commission is as biased as the Warren Commission. Ironic, commission (implies money was exchanged) instead of having an INVESTIGATION which is what everyone wants! We have military bases in foreign countries, do any foreign controls have military bases here? Rebuilding America's Defenses is REAL, they are following the guidelines to a T right in front of the entire world. Please wake up America!

  • If it was a controlled demolition, than what happened to the SOUND of explosions? None of the were heard.

  • @Subaru537 Oh but it was. Firefighters still to this day swear they heard them. Look up 9/11 Firemen Explosions and 9/11 explosions. They try and say it's the windows popping out, but windows don't sound like explosives!

  • i think it's obvious, bush is the most dangerous terrorist, attacking even his own people. just for oil/power.

  • @Alpstarr50 he is a puppet---zionists-

  • @TheBuffaloeye that's right. so please explain, what the fuck is the u.s. doing in afghanistan/iraq?

  • @Alpstarr50 When Russians left Afganistan ,Talibans (created by CIA itself) came to power the traffic of heroin decreased by 86% which is very bad because it's more profitable than oil, even weapon sale.The traffic was supposed to be restored,kardeshim benim.

  • Everything will prob. come out with some of the 290.000 Wikileaks...Truth is coming,be prepared USA.

  • Why is everyone stuck on the idea of thermite? Theres a LOOOONNNGG list of other types of explosives.

  • In my opinion that's the strongest proof

  • You hear that Truthers...at 0:39 where she says 1,100ºF is less than the temperature of a bonfire, so there's obviously no "molten steel" there...

    P.S. Nice "example" of thermite on the car...the narrator says that it's melting the engine even though it barely cut through the hood...and of course they do not show the claimed melted engine (2:34)

    P.P.S. 5:32 is wrong, it was 1,300ºF, and was not 6 months

    P.P.P.S. At 7:22 we see the angled cuts that all of you know was made by the cleanup crews

  • @CrazyRay7979 The frekin clea up crew..Come on dude..When you cut steal manually you take the shortes route...

  • Funny title:

    Too bad thermite doesn't explode, so therefore your supposed explosions are not explosive explosions...it is also not used and has never been used in a controlled demolition...you fail

  • 7:22 tells everything

  • that shit pouring out was most likely aluminum or some sort of other metal

  • @baezalejandro Aluminum is silver when melting...

  • @MrFrank1369 and aluminum isn't the only metal within the buiding. ever heard of copper pipes?

  • @baezalejandro Yes, we've heard of them, they were used 40 years ago and beyond for plumbing but caused a nasty taste and smell so got discontinued.

  • this video is bull. that is not "molten" steel. molten steel is LIQUID steel. just cuz something glows redhot doesn't mean it's melted. it could of been an aluminum. and even if the steel didn't melt the intense heat and TONSof loading bearing on the columns could of morphed the beams and caused them to glow red hot.

  • @baezalejandro. Any factual info you want to share please feel free.

  • @DJCW there steel isn't the only metal in building u know. it could of been copper or something else. and my point is thermite works quickly but not THAT quickly; i'd like to see a video of a building being taken down by thermite that smoothly. demos r usually done with C4 or TNT becuz they're the most STABLE! and thermite is easily set off by heat. the intense pressure and heat created by the impact of the plane would of surely set off the thermite involuntarily if there was some.

  • @baezalejandro why do you think molten metal was dripping below Plane....

  • @MrFrank1369 "dripping below Plane...." ?????

    i've seen molten metal dripping from the corners of the building but NEVER the plane.

    2nd aluminum melts at a lower temp and even glows at a certain temperature. look it up.

  • It was nuclear demo, only way heats of this temp where mantained for that long. Its the only way. Thermite was also used to in order to properly direct the blast wave. Check out 911thology on youtube.

  • Controlled demolition job for sure.

  • I may think it may be an inside jobbut there is nothing we can do about it now.

  • @The5Vloggers IF they have done this, what else might have they done?

  • @MrFrank1369 thermate works quicker than thermite but not quick enough to produce that quick and clean of a collapse.

    either way, ANY explosive would of been involuntarily set off upon impact

  • We all know it was a controlled demolition now. Keep chipping away at the lies and hopefully, the whole truth will be exposed.

  • @saintearth Yea, but the people who got paid off by the illuminatie are going to disprove you. Iluminatie control everything.

  • @saintearth Inside Job :)

  • you forgot sulfur. but nice try.

  • and steel is not iron oxide. Plus, the heat of kerosene (jet fuel), and office furniture, computers etc... only reach temperatures of 600º+. The steel beams actually redistribute the heat throughout the rest of the steel. Think metal spoon in boiling soup. The end of the spoon gets hot too. And lead shot at a steel plate would flatten like a pancake. Your logic is ridiculous.

  • jasongray?....good theory, and i can see where you are coming from.....but i am an aircraft engineer....and ...NAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you would need to speak to a scientist to find exact mix ratio etc, but there was a very interesting report issued by a Danish scientist, who after 2 years research, found unreacted thermite in the WTC dust. You have to ask?..........how DID unreacted thermite get into the middle of NY city?

  • @Nicoladrag You must be a liar nicoladrag. I was an aircraft fire fighter with the navy and any aircraft engineer knows the amount of magnesium, aluminum and steel in an aircraft are just right to make thermite. The problem is when the magnesium ignites at 2000 degrees it burns at 5600 degrees melting the steel and aluminum into itself forming thermite. In the navy you must jettison aircraft or it melts through the steel ship.

  • @ckilr01 yea? im studying x-ray crystallography. i am proficient in chemistry and physics. lets review thermite. aluminum powder and iron oxide (Fe2 O3). straight iron does not work in thermite. what your saying is impossible. the iron would have to oxidize instantly into rust, be pulverized into powder, then mix with the aluminum (also needs to be powdered) in large enough quantities to react, and which would have to be ignited by magnesium thats also powdered, or in large strips. furthermore..

  • @ckilr01 swirling particles in the air EVEN IF all that miraculously happened in that instant are not enough to ignite. thermite has to be in piles, or otherwise in a container for the reaction to continue. you shoulda payed attention in school, cuz you look like a real moron. :]

  • @KymeraGR7 3:09 in the vid above. The sparks washing down... is exactly what thermite looks like when burning. How ironic...

  • @Ktazmat what im saying is it wasnt the plane hitting the building that magically made thermite. i agree it was placed beforehand. however i have come to one other conclusion (despite that they DID find thermite in the WTC dust) that COULD be a large power coupling sparking.. but then again the evidence UNDER the rubble with all the molten metal is indisputable. sorry bro, im just playing devils advocate.

  • @KymeraGR7 we are all in trouble if we don't start speaking out... the more anyone denies it the more damning evidence they find... the icing on the cake for me was when Operation Northwoods was declassified. To any who still thinks they wouldn't... WRONG!

  • @Ktazmat you're missing my point here. people that claim missiles wrapped in holograms, blue plasma shielded planes that hit the pentagon... they're out of their mind. all possibilities NEED to be explored, hard data and plausible theories produced. too many people, like dylan avery, skew or flat out lie about the facts to make their point. no, what I'm saying is we have nothing thats been organized into a proper hypothesis yet, only a theory that fits the facts.

  • @KymeraGR7 Last time I checked that's genocide and tyranny. Punishable by death. I hope the Bush Administration ROTS IN HELL (if there is one), at the very least, held responsible for the crimes committed. Thanks for being respectable Kymera, even with some differences of opinion, you haven't tried to slam my balls against the wall or call me something I'm not. I'd like to keep this going preferable off youtube, see what you think about some of the other facts known about that day. IF that's ok.

  • @Ktazmat perfectly fine with it man. im just a realist is all. oh for the record... i dont think we killed osama recently. i think he's been dead. at-sea burial, two stories of how he died... yeah i dont buy it. plus, would pakistan really let us perform operations on their soil? i dont think so. i think it may have been staged to some degree. i dont see the paki's really liking what we did there, considering they wont give our helicopter back. lol

  • @KymeraGR7 If you want solid scientific proof of a conspiracy then get NIST to have their data peer reviewed. NIST never submitted the reports on the building collapses for peer review. Strange. NIST won't release the data used in the computer simulated collapse. Odd. NIST is holding all the keys on this one. If you really want answers, NIST has them and won't share the data with anyone. Without peer review, NIST's assertions are just that, assertions and assumptions and both begin with ass.

  • @Daddyo930 it appears we'll have to rally a crew and take that info by force now doesnt it?

  • @Ktazmat nobody, and i mean NOBODY has come up with anything that doesnt sound half baked. my personal opinion? if we want the evidence, a civilian team willing to possibly do prison time needs to be organized, all the evidence TAKEN from the hanger at (forgot which) airport where a few bits of the leftovers from WTC are, and certain people need to be tortured and questioned at gunpoint to get the truth.

  • @KymeraGR7 But I do agree, the shields, laser, transoribital space-time continuum theories are foolish. In order to create a fire for war, the Bush Administration and conspirators flew planes into WTC, an unidentifiable object into the pentagon, and made a plane vanish over Pennsylvania. Then pointed the finger at Osama and Al-queda (who are known U.S. creations). While knowing 19/19 "hijackers" were Saudi's (a great American ally - where women are not allowed to drive), we entered Afghanistan.

  • @Ktazmat - Absolutely spot on with that. The whole things is so crooked that the leaning tower of Pisa looks vertical in comparison. The whole situation has so many holes in it that im amazed that people still deny the truth. Colleteral damage is the part that most people cannot digest. The planes hitting the towers were the biggest precursor for war... how do you motivate 310 million Americans to go to war? Kill 3000 of your own people, broadcast it worldwide and blame it on Al-Qaeda. Simple.

  • @KymeraGR7 Iraq was next. Whose next? Pakistan / Iran? The story keeps going with no whistle blower, what happened to our media? Just like Hugo Chavez is some mutant dictator - false. He is a successful socialist whom the U.S. government smears because he has control over something they want! OIL. Whats in Iraq, Afghan, Pakistan? Lies and propaganda for oil.

  • @ckilr01 OH YEAH lets not forget that steel rust does NOT work in a thermite reaction. i somehow doubt you even are an aircraft engineer, and if you are i sure as hell wouldnt fly in anything you built. lol

  • @Nicoladrag I'm also an aviation engineer, and thermite is used without a doubt. Kerosine burns max. at 980 Celcius. Not hot enough to melt steel.

  • @AnneBoersma Terrorist were in the building planting thermite explosives probably long long before 9/11. The Fireman who said he opened a closet to find away out of the collapsing building said a dead body was in there. Somebody killed? Security? Police? This realy seems to be black OPS. Insurance claim on the building months before. Two buildings collapse the same way, what are the odds of that happening? TWO BUILDINGS! a third building some other part city unexpectily collapse. COVER-UP!

  • Dude, the towers were designed to withstand one/two hits from a fully loader passenger plane and still not collapse. The towers only supposedly got hit by one each. That means they shouldn't of collapsed. The designer for the tower paid most attention to this aspect of the WTC.

  • And you commonly ignore bldg 7.

  • lolz, sped. u need iron oxide and aluminium powder retard.

  • pretty damning evidence those beams cut very neatly at angles...

  • no planes on 9/11

  • The McCormick Center in Chicago and the Sight and Sound Theater in Pennsylvania are examples of steel structures collapsing.

    The Kader Toy Factory fire, which occurred on May 10, 1993. Buildings 1, 2, and 3 all collapsed as a result of that fire (see Kader Toy FactoryFire).

    It might be noted that non of these buildings were struck by 767's or had the North Tower of the WTC fall through the front facade.

  • Well, the hotel in Madrid spain burned for 19 hours and there was nothing left EXCEPT the steel frame. the toy factory wasn't a steel framed skyscraper. You guys are really reaching.

  • "the hotel in Madrid spain burned for 19 hours and there was nothing left EXCEPT the steel frame."

    NOT TRUE. It is you who are reaching and lying. The steel did fail and collapse in the Windsor Tower.

    The only reason why the Windsor Tower didn't completely fail is because the core was made of concrete and NOT steel.

  • let's see the video of the windsor tower falling! and why did the twin towers explode and pulverize the concrete? Your logic is faulty. And if the windsor tower did fall, why didn't it burn for only 2 hours and not collapse?

  • Google "9/11 Cancers"

  • The FBI polygraphers will clean-up this mess.

    Google "Quadri-Track ZCT"

  • YES

  • Somebody ERASED the WIKI page on "nano-thermite". I read it this morning, and now its not there?

  • are you serious man?????????????

  • dudue i totsllly bet it wash the cia. like weird man.

    did u uhhh look anywhere else, im pretty sure the information exists outside of wikipedia

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more