.......Shills have lamely suggested that the collapsing of columns absorbs the angular momentum, but any resistance the lower section offers contributes to the rotating due to the angle and shifted centre of mass.
Thus the cessation of toppling proves that the top section encountered no resistance which discounts the theory of gravity induced collapse.
The top section of the south tower begins to topple due to the localized structural damage, it reaches an angle of about 23 degrees by the time the tower collapses
Basic physics shows that the shift in centre of mass due to the angle means that any torque imparted by gravitational pressure on the lower section accelerates the rotation. The base of the top section acting as a fulcrum.......
symmetric, even collapse is IMPOSSIBLE without demolition as all structural supports must be removed simultaneously across each floor, this is impossible in a natural collapse as even a slight integrity inequality ALWAYS leads to a messy uneven and in most cases partial collapse
The collapses themselves violate the law of conservation of momentum. There is no way that all the solid structural steel columns and supports, especially all the ones below the impacts unaffected by fire would offer no resistance to produce near freefall speed
Is WTC7's alleged early-on wall-bulge not completely consistent with thermite?
I believe it clearly is consistent with thermite, so why is Gage dismissing the possibility of WTC7's early-on wall-bulge? Is it just because FDNY claims they measured it?
I'm a Rice Grad. i am a structural engineer and have 20 years of demolition experience I knew this was a demolition when it happened. I'm also a member of ae911truth. You don't have to be an engineer to know these were demolitions, all that's required is basic physics and common sense. Apparently you have neither.
Perhaps there were no planes and only holograms. The buildings were wired ahead of time and Alex Jones is not pulling your dick about NWO and the Illuminati for 12 years. LOL
it's unpatriotic to believe in the law of physics.pass the flouride please.this hurts my brain.turn on american idol.more aspartame ma.and lock the door,bin laden might be outside.
You don't know shit about thermite! It doesn't work that way! It burns straight down and there is no way to secure it in the way necessary to the side of a steel column.
The building did not fall in 7 seconds.
These dopes are yanking your chain for the money!!
Google debunk 9-11, there is plenty of proof that's 5 years old!
We got a debunker,tell me some thing how much is the goverment paying you to leave comments & spread disinfo. I got news for you,so called debunkers,we are the majority & like or not,the secrets out & 911 is exposed.
I get $100,000 into a Swiss acount every 6 months from the ZIO-NEO-CON-NWO Lizard race fund, which is paid for entirely by your tax dollars via the World Bank and The Federal Reserve. You very smart!
We have presented our facts to you & the only thing you can do is resort to name calling,like a school boy. Instead of presenting you own facts to us & that sounds like desperation to me.
This just proves my point,you haven't offered us,the reasons why you think 911 wasn't an inside job. We have evidence,what do you have,but self deluded anger & your so quick to label us as paranoid basement freaks. Which isn't true
I never said the planes were fake,What I said is theres no way those buildings could go down the way they. Did,with out inside help of the explosive kind,I challenge you to explain beuilding seven.
You still haven't explained building seven & I think its you thats been taken by huxters or your just. A goverment disinfo agent,you have a right to your point of view,because thats all you given me.
From what I researched there is a scientific debate going on about 911 & there are allot scientist on our side. You should get your facts straight & I will check out your site I just didn't notice it until a second ago.
No way they could have gone down the way they did?
That's an absurd assertion. There is no other way for them to fall but down, according to the laws of physics.
The first building took 12.5 seconds to fall.
Most conspiracy theorists lack the skill of critical thinking. It is important to consider the source of the information presented as well as the validity.
There is NO DEBATE among structural engineers, physicists and architects about 9/11.
Demolition proven.
THE END.
TruthAvenger100 2 years ago
.......Shills have lamely suggested that the collapsing of columns absorbs the angular momentum, but any resistance the lower section offers contributes to the rotating due to the angle and shifted centre of mass.
Thus the cessation of toppling proves that the top section encountered no resistance which discounts the theory of gravity induced collapse.
TruthAvenger100 2 years ago
The top section of the south tower begins to topple due to the localized structural damage, it reaches an angle of about 23 degrees by the time the tower collapses
Basic physics shows that the shift in centre of mass due to the angle means that any torque imparted by gravitational pressure on the lower section accelerates the rotation. The base of the top section acting as a fulcrum.......
TruthAvenger100 2 years ago
symmetric, even collapse is IMPOSSIBLE without demolition as all structural supports must be removed simultaneously across each floor, this is impossible in a natural collapse as even a slight integrity inequality ALWAYS leads to a messy uneven and in most cases partial collapse
TruthAvenger100 2 years ago
The collapses themselves violate the law of conservation of momentum. There is no way that all the solid structural steel columns and supports, especially all the ones below the impacts unaffected by fire would offer no resistance to produce near freefall speed
TruthAvenger100 2 years ago
Is WTC7's alleged early-on wall-bulge not completely consistent with thermite?
I believe it clearly is consistent with thermite, so why is Gage dismissing the possibility of WTC7's early-on wall-bulge? Is it just because FDNY claims they measured it?
He doesn't ever say.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
ZIONISTS OUT!
PersianPaladin 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
just msg me on my M.S.N in my profile.
wanna see my tits? lol just check out my personal page y7
1267650 3 years ago
A bunch of brain-dead children incapable of critical thought believe Alex Jones and send him money.
debunk911 3 years ago
I'm a Rice Grad. i am a structural engineer and have 20 years of demolition experience I knew this was a demolition when it happened. I'm also a member of ae911truth. You don't have to be an engineer to know these were demolitions, all that's required is basic physics and common sense. Apparently you have neither.
riceowlex 3 years ago 5
You guys are so much smarter than I thought.
Perhaps there were no planes and only holograms. The buildings were wired ahead of time and Alex Jones is not pulling your dick about NWO and the Illuminati for 12 years. LOL
debunk911 3 years ago
fuck me lord bush..i believe in your war on terror. fuck me.
chumbels 3 years ago
So my question for all you:
Why would someone detonate buildings in freefall collapse?
debunk911 3 years ago
The answer is simple,in order to finish the buildings off & you forget that two minutes passed before the towers came down.
crypter27 3 years ago
That makes no sense!
debunk911 3 years ago
alex jones is an american hero.watch.
chumbels 3 years ago
LOL
ALex Jones is the Ron Popeel of the fear-mongering industry!
This is his huxter guest-speaker.
I listen for entertainmnt and comendy What's your excuse?
=)
debunk911 3 years ago
it's unpatriotic to believe in the law of physics.pass the flouride please.this hurts my brain.turn on american idol.more aspartame ma.and lock the door,bin laden might be outside.
chumbels 3 years ago
Loser,
You don't know shit about thermite! It doesn't work that way! It burns straight down and there is no way to secure it in the way necessary to the side of a steel column.
The building did not fall in 7 seconds.
These dopes are yanking your chain for the money!!
Google debunk 9-11, there is plenty of proof that's 5 years old!
debunk911 3 years ago
Love ya! Alex!!! Support Money Bomb!! Get Alex on TV!!
malainegill 3 years ago 2
THE INFOWARS MONEY BOMB HAS STARTED.
Funding a bigger megaphone to reach the masses.
Donate now at infowarsmoneybomb. com (remove space)
kevlarthehorribleone 3 years ago
911 was an inside job
crypter27 3 years ago 7
yEah! Inside YOUR MIND!
debunk911 3 years ago
Yeah, inside yo head
debunk911 3 years ago
We got a debunker,tell me some thing how much is the goverment paying you to leave comments & spread disinfo. I got news for you,so called debunkers,we are the majority & like or not,the secrets out & 911 is exposed.
crypter27 3 years ago
I get $100,000 into a Swiss acount every 6 months from the ZIO-NEO-CON-NWO Lizard race fund, which is paid for entirely by your tax dollars via the World Bank and The Federal Reserve. You very smart!
debunk911 3 years ago
We have presented our facts to you & the only thing you can do is resort to name calling,like a school boy. Instead of presenting you own facts to us & that sounds like desperation to me.
crypter27 3 years ago
ahaha What facts?
No one denies 9-11 as it happened; not Iran, not Saudi Arabia, not Osama, not China, Russia, NO ONE!
Only neo-nazis, Arab Islamist propagandists, unethical book sellers and paranoid basement-dwellers on your side.
What facts?
debunk911 3 years ago
This just proves my point,you haven't offered us,the reasons why you think 911 wasn't an inside job. We have evidence,what do you have,but self deluded anger & your so quick to label us as paranoid basement freaks. Which isn't true
crypter27 3 years ago
What facts have you presented?
Fake planes with no windows, remote controlled by the CIA? Are you on crack?
That Larry Silverstein is a demolitions captain who blew the bldg7 that burned for 6 hours first?
Or that 3 non-squibs, actually pressure in the fire escape stairwells??
Three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead. - Benjamin Franklin
IDIOTS
debunk911 3 years ago
I never said the planes were fake,What I said is theres no way those buildings could go down the way they. Did,with out inside help of the explosive kind,I challenge you to explain beuilding seven.
crypter27 3 years ago
YOU HAVE BEEN DECEIVED BY HUXTERS & PSEUDOSCIENTISTS!!
TRUTH Bldg 7:
debunking911(dot)com/pull.htm
debunk911 3 years ago
You still haven't explained building seven & I think its you thats been taken by huxters or your just. A goverment disinfo agent,you have a right to your point of view,because thats all you given me.
crypter27 3 years ago
I just gave you a webpage of legitimate Building 7 information.
Instead, you choose to rely on the phoney Richard Gage? He has NO credentials to be discussing this.
I wish I were a Govt. disinformation agent.
debunk911 3 years ago
From what I researched there is a scientific debate going on about 911 & there are allot scientist on our side. You should get your facts straight & I will check out your site I just didn't notice it until a second ago.
crypter27 3 years ago
No way they could have gone down the way they did?
That's an absurd assertion. There is no other way for them to fall but down, according to the laws of physics.
The first building took 12.5 seconds to fall.
Most conspiracy theorists lack the skill of critical thinking. It is important to consider the source of the information presented as well as the validity.
There is NO DEBATE among structural engineers, physicists and architects about 9/11.
debunk911 3 years ago
keep it up alex!!!!!
deluxchixbone 3 years ago 6
Love your vids!
TheSandreGuy 3 years ago 5