No matter what u think of this guy, I'm sure we can agree that this is what independent media has to offer. Actual investigative journalists focused on educating and informing as opposed to "entertaining" and distracting. Great job Sam.
Great job getting the vid and audio on this case. I do have a question for Sam. What if it was assumed that at the time you accepted a benefit (you wouldn't be there unless they already had alleged signed proof that you did...), that you understood the cause and nature of the conditions of that benefit? You had a driver's license correct? Your signature is on the driver license application? Read with a law dictionary, the words you agreed to.
We can never find justice at the hands of corrupt judges. (See) Judge To Judge On Illegal Payments To Judges. Evil Triangle of Court Corruption. Richard Fine. Dr shirley Moore SBX 211. Now is the time to be heard. The fight to end this title wave of corruption in our country must start with the corrupt judges. Show your support now or wait untill your fate is at the hands of corrupt judges.
Bring an action against the cop and police department for damages caused their exceeding their jurisdiction.
You really kick butt... I wish you had a victory here, and you were more skilled in law, but you have the cajones to make your points and you make them well. You truly are a member of the Press- a real investigative journalist. And you look like you are my age or younger-Bravo.
Balzy guy, playing interesting words games with unusually patient and tolerant court staff. He compared our (deeply flawed) system to China - I wonder if he thinks he could pull this crap in China?
When he left, I wonder if he got into the car for which he acknowledged the state's authority to require licensing and permits, and drove on the roads over property taken against the will of his fellow citizens (as opposed to by mutual agreement)?
I'm undergoing a similar situation. I live in Bryan TX & I was charged with "failure to wear a seat-belt", but I wrote Non-Assumpsit clearly on the ticket, & since then all the court documents they've handed me I've signed that way as well, but when I went to pre-trial, I basically agreed to a not-guilty plea & set for trial before knowing much of this, so if you have any good advice for me, itd be much appreciated
this is happening to me in kansas right now... .and they tried to declare me incompetent, I gave the counselor a history on law, and the constitution. He said that Just because I believe in upholding constitutional rights, does not make me crazy.... so Now I can represent myself. And there will be hell to pay for those bastards.
Are you a lawyer? If not then why are you following all their rules and jumping through all their hoops? You know what I file? A letter sent USPS certificate of mailing. Is the letter double spaced? Nope! If they complain what do I say "If you have a copy of my license to practice law, then I would be very happy for you to produce it. If you cannot produce said license, then too bad! I am in control in these situations. You are not in control. That is why you lose and I win!
Wow! So absolutely powerful this video is! It reminds me of how Indian Rights in Canada are constatnly underminded by the Federal Goverment. Good job and I am so proud of this gentlemen for sticking his neck out for all of us! POWER TO THE PEOPLE!
You're bringing up correct issues in the WRONG 'court' - you're being brought in to an administrative commercial hearing and trying to argue 'the law' - all that applies in an administrative hearing is up to the administrator. Take a look at the def. for a 'court of record' in Black's 4th and start learning how you can easily obtain a remedy when you are being falsely charged with violating codes to which you are not subject (but certain courts act like they're a real court and people buy it)
Sam, this was very instructive - thank you for posting it. Here's what I Believe happened in there. As soon as you identified yourself with THE NAME, that is, responded to the judge in the affirmative when your name was called, you created a nexus. A contract. At that point, it does not matter what you say afterwards. You've placed yourself under the courts jurisdiction. You, at that point, "understand." That is, you stand under their jurisdiction. No matter what's said next, you are guilty.
You say you don't understand, but you hold a driver's license (contract, and to enter it you agree to 'understand' (STAND UNDER) the highway safety code)
If you 'understand' the invisible contracts, then you will see why they behaved in the fashion they did.
When the officer wrote up that offer for you, if you hold a license you accept it by default, whether or not you physically take it, sign it, rip it up, spit on it, run it over.
1st sign the ticket 'under duress' that makes it impossible to get a 'failure to appear' unless the judge 'orders you to appear'. The plea gives the court 'jurisdiction' over you. Conditional acceptance is the only way to stay in 'honor'. "I conditionally accept your charge on proof of claim that you can prove jurisdiction over me". File a claim of right ala Rob Menard or Tim Turners Freedom Docs.
If there is no 'injured party" you are under 'color of law' and not LAW.
You didn't mention a verified claim,black robed administrators,!A Corporation operating under commercial law (offer ,consideration ,acceptance) The "COURTS" must show a contract that is violated to get you into their jurisdiction. This is not a court of law but of Equity ,once they get venue before you allow them to adjudicate it is an Admiralty court .Birth cert is not me ,The judge has the right over your legal fiction which you did not deny???
Found this from Sam's interview with Marc Stevens on the No State Project radio show. A lot of the things shown here are expressed in Marc's book "Adventures in Legal Land", were Marc goes into a lot more detail, explains the reasons why Judges get upset and stamp their feet like spoilt children when you ask them questions.
it the second amendment freedom of press they actualy arnt suposed to be able to stp said cameras from entering the courts as long as you can prove that you are a member of the press and 2 do that all you need is to have a youtube channel
So it's a complicated system to which you don't understand, and you want professionals that do that job, and trained in it to train YOU to defend yourself, at your leisure, outside of the policy of the court. He seems mentally disabled. Is he alright?
Bellamy (1855-1931) adopted the roman salute - a gesture in which the arm is held out forward straight, with palm down - to accompany the American Pledge of Allegiance. Bellamy was not a Nazi. As an admirer of the French Revolution - which meant so much to Jefferson and his friends, 'Liberty, equality, fraternity' - he chose their adoption of the roman salute. For obvious reasons Congress officially adopted the Flag Code with the hand-over-the-heart gesture in 1942.
Good and important video! In December, 2004, I had a similar situation with Judge Jim Boyd and court staff in Prairie Grove District Court in Arkansas, except I didn't bring a camera and the judge did patently threaten me with jail just for asking questions and refusing to sign a Waiver Of Right To Counsel.
"Bureaucrats are basically good people" ... I disagree. What's good about stupidity? Nothing. They are theives, whether it's due to stupidity or malevolence is of no consequence. If they simply didn't understand but also hadn't taken action, it would be forgivable. But that's not the case. They don't understand what they are doing, but they have chosen to initiate force against us all. That is unacceptable.
Did you just miss the point, while at the same time making it? I beleive he refers to the their intention, not what they are. You are correct in "they don't understand what they are doing" (I hope). The positive thing that Sam has perfect clarity on is that; When good people who beleive they are doing right, find they are mistaken, they change. Sam, I beleive is working towards that definition of change.
Rather than say "all men are created equally" I would just state: "all men are equal under the law". This eliminates idiotic religious memes and ambiguity of meaning. Such things confuse the sheep, and we're trying to get the sheep to run interference for us, at minimum, if not stampede in our chosen direction. It's hard to get them on our side if they're confused about the best possible meaning of the terms. (Did god try just as hard to create me as he did my neighbor? Duhhrr...)
The brilliant and courageous man who created and stars in this video was arrested the other day for daring to question an unsigned sheet of paper ordering people not to film in court or a public lobby of a court despite NH law that says cameras are to be allowed in courtrooms. Google "free keene" to learn more at the Free Keene blog and Google "CD evolution" to find out how you can help.
All he has to do is remember who he is...the court was referring to his ALL CAPS name,or his legal fiction if u will...all he had to do was say,i do not consent and i waive all benefits...game over....everything they do to you in their courtrooms is merely an offer....thanks but no thanks sir :)
Yep, fiction... when i worked for the gov, I was fired after refusing to assist in the embezzlement of a LOT of money... mandatory admin meetings at a school district featured smart alecks bragging about ideas to force public schools to watch pornography... my last job, next to the justice dept in the gov complex, turned out to be a front for cocaine distribution... this is just the surface... medical fraud is the biggest one...
yes that is a conflict of interest i know the system inside out state law is no more confusing than coal mine or diamond mine for that matter thats what it comes down to your right no contest
I do agree, though, that instating the pledge of allegiance in schools as a requirment is, as Gore Vidal says, "importing fascism." But to call a consciencious Christian socialist like Bellamy a Nazi is total distortion and slander.
you're either misinformed or completely disingenuous to conflate Bellamy's Christain Socialism with Nazism. That's absurd. Just because Nazis appropriated the same hand salute doesn't make the ideologies synonymous. Nazi fascism, racism, and ethnocentricy are not intrinsic to socialism.
Habeous Corpus has nothing to do with it. He wasn't being held. That bit just made him look stupid. Understanding the nature of the charge is the first hurdle. I won't tell you the two facts about that that you obviously don't know. I suggest you do something else with your life. What you are doing here is fruitless and you are going to get yourself into a situation that you won't believe and that there's no getting out of. I know you won't listen, but you'll wish you had.
well...did they drop the charge? Great advice and use of knowledge of the laws. The court system today takes advantage of the lack of knowledge held by many people sitting in the hot seat.
the only difference between a prosecutor and a judge is the presence of a gavel. other than that, they're all pigs rolling around in the same filth getting their paychecks from the same source.
They are calling it criminal, and have told me over and over to go pay for one of their lawyers, who will only present options the court wants.
It's such a hopelessly flawed system. Private competing arbitration services will go a long way to end this kind of corruption, malfeasance and outright contempt for customers.
Sam - have you filed charges against the judge yet for obstructing justice? You should file them with the district attorney that is above him. Follow the Randy Kelton method and you can really give them a run for their money.
I think you can really get to the next level as soveriegn individual under the rule of law, by bringing the charges to their door step. they slapped with a charge based on their leagl fictions, now it's your turn bind them to the constitution using the thier oath of office, and rack up real violations on them, get them fighting with each other and force them to recognize the real law they are supposed to be obeying.
Sam, I've heard you on FTL and watched this and some of your other videos. I *so* envy your courage and knowledge! Actually I think I have the courage, but without the knowledge or ability to reason or good communication skills (all of which you apparently have) I wouldn't get very far and my experience wouldn't be a good display to educate anyone. Thank you so much for your courage and action, and your well-written documentary.
Thanks. All you have to do is start small. Begin to question authority and the "have to-s. . ." in life.
I'm discussing this on the ASR forums, this s a note to let them know, yes, it's really me. :) I think it will be an interesting discussion, and I hope to learn a few things from the black community's perspective.
Cont'd: You already caught the judge as entering a not guilty plea that only a representative can do. From there on out, I'd just play it cool, as even in a jury trial of your peers should be able to discern what's going on. Have any seen adventures in legal land? He kind of does the same thing at pretrial.
Iain1962 your reply tells me you are a cop. Or you do not know the law or your rights. The court you are being tried in is an admiralty court, which they have no right to try you in. If they do not have a signed statement from an injured party then you haven't broken any COMMON LAW, which is what we are to be judged upon. Far from a waste of time. I fought for 5 months and ny case was dismissed.
Well where did it get him? He annoyed a whole bunch of people just doing their jobs, who can't change anything, and ends up with a court case just the same.
I see the point but this is attacking the symptom not the disease. If you really want things to change you have to attack the system not the pawns just doing their jobs, they aren't going to say, "OK you're right let's just forget the whole thing."
I understand attacking the system this way is only marginally effective, changes little, and costs more time than it's worth.
Do you understand the video itself is designed to challenging the viewers belief system. This will bring about the change I want. Competing private arbitration services, with no group holding a monopoly on the perceived legitimate initiation of force.
What's your solution/suggestion? I'm always looking for something more effective.
I would have limited my objections to the judge. Perhaps challenged his very authority, but messing around with the pawns in the system doesn't get you anywhere, they are just following instructions.
Instead of "fighting" them you want them on your side, try and convert those guys in a nice way.
That's my opinion anyway.
Good job though I suppose if everybody did this they would have to change things, unfortunately there are just way too many sheep.
>Good job though I suppose if everybody did this they would have to change things,
Probably for the worse. The judicial branch is the only branch left still defending the US public. When people tie up the system like this, the judicial branch might decide to take even more short cuts. My suggestion is, since you already caught the judge as fraud, you should have entered a not guilty plea, trial by jury, and then show the footage in court, or transcribe it. I enjoyed the video, tho. Very brave.
Sam - this stuff is fascinating. I am curious about the questions that you wanted to ask the judge. What were the questions? And what is happening now in this case?
when you GET a contract it is a bill,the bill could be moneytised[recognised for value;turning it into a security and case closed.But schools dont teach us the rules!
So we go to court to find the CONSTITUTION dosnt COUNT in COURTS[we have a colour of law [rule] that works CONTRACT law]
The issued bill wasnt paid [simple buisness LAW]you either prove THERE was NO servic[thus NO victim]by claiming standing as THE injured party or allow the lie,most just pay
V, Name ONE person who was murdered for "not cooperating". Based on what I heard in the video, the court did not even find this putz in contempt of court for "not cooperating".
You already seem to have a hobby. Now, get a life.
Is your position so flawed you must resort to personal attacks rather than responding to questions?
Name one? Mr. Carrion, an air force vet shot 3 times by Ivory Webb for following his orders. There's even google video. Or the guy in NC shot 5 times after they tased him and he was throwing up on the ground, or how about. . Are you seriously this indoctrinated or completely ignorant?
Your judge tried to levy contempt, I just looked at him and his silly piece of paper, and he changed his mind.
It's not MY position that leads me to personal attacks. (It's more YOUR position that does; calling people who don't agree with you "statist", ignorant and corrupt.)
So these people were shot by "the system" and not by individual assholes abusing their power? How wrong to elevate instances to systemic. BTW. Won't there be violence in "your" world as the strong take advantage of the weak? So naive.
Wow. You just LOOKED at the judge and he changed his mind. Pretty oppressive system.
Ah, your saying I make you lash out in personal attacks. Tell me hessmij, do you always let other people control your emotions, or is it just me? I was unaware I had this power over you.
The system is flawed by design, has dishonest incentives, and it's devoid of market signals.
And No, Your judge looked at me when I didn't take his form like a good little subject, as he commanded. He circled the floor in his black dress a couple of times, and then decided later to "rescind the matter"
Obscured, I'm sure you realize you have the "power" to make others think you are a putz for demanding the court explain the nature and cause of a speeding ticket (see Wagnog below if you are still having a hard time with this). You're still calling people ignorant and/or corrupt for not agreeing with you. (Don't assume that they don't 'get' your position.)
Your outcome in court is the best arguement against you. You walked away. Not a murder victim of the State.
I'm calling you ignorant, because after all these posts you have yet to correctly state my position. The PROCEEDINGS, not the charge genius. I asked earlier, but you didn't answer.
Of course Big government authoritarian statists like you don't have to listen (gov. has no incentive to provide customer service) there too busy telling everyone else what do do.
I'll drive at a safe speed based on my judgment, thank you. I'm not your servant to order around sir.
I want to understand the proceedings, the role these people assume in the actions they are bringing against me, and how they attained the authority to initiate force against me.
Do I need to understand the proceedings? Why don't they hold court in another language? (oh wait, they do, legal ease) Habeous Corpus includes the proceedings sir.
Otherwise, why do I need to even be there?
If I'm not to understand, and they can enter a plea, what am I there for?
You didn't answer the question. Not surprising, as most statists don't want to face questions about the legitimacy of their actions.
Let me ask again, Should the state be able to make up some complex process you don't understand, refuse to explain it to you, and make threats against your person and/or property? Is that a legitimate way to do business?
I understand where this guy is coming from, but a privatized court system? That could never work, because the only court that has the power to actually enforce its decisions is state/federal court.
There are hundreds of "non governmental" courts. It's called arbitration / ejudication. If you have a workers comp claim, Unemployment insurance claim, and several others that I can't think of. You agree to them BEFORE hand and sign a waiver stating such.
The court should be renamed, "The Court of Public Miscreants/Frauds," referring to those 'public' a-bombs who contort and mess with the same laws they have 'sworn' to abide by and defend.
Are you sure Francis Bellamy was a Nazi?? It says here he was a Christian Socialist, and the pledge was written in 1892. I'm pretty sure there were no Nazis there. Did someone fuck up on wiki?
Awesome!!! I don't know if you will come out on top of this, but I see you point of view and applaud your efforts at the top of my voice. 5 stars!!!!!
These are actions of ASSUMPSIT debt in a court of no record (inferior court).80% there isn't even a sworn statement to even start a case. They CON people and scare ppl.. They have 1000's of ways to get your consent through your silence.
B4 there is ever a plea you can.
1.Abate the action ,
2.Demurrer,
3.Demand a court of record (your are the sovereign) which follows the common law (no legal fictions or statutes)
I'll look into the other options, but Demurrer is prohibited in TX. Send me a PM if you can point me to a good resource, as I have 2 more I'm working now.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The judge enters a plea because you are innocent until proven guilty. Are you guilty or not? You are clearly a very angry person, and this is a very dull video. People are being genuinely wronged all around the world, and you can't take your medicine. Grow up.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I don't think I've missed a single validly made point here. Granted the justice system is flawed, just like any man-made system, but comparing American democracy to the Chinese legal system, please, are you serious?
The judge is not allowed to enter a plea on the behalf of the defendant, because he does not represent the defendant.
The defendant wanted to understand the nature and consequences of the charges against him. The judge was unwilling to oblige him with an explanation.
mirkinboy, I think you don't get it. The plea entered FOR the defendant, without the defendant receiving the aforementioned explanation, IS largely the point of this video, questioning the courts authority.
Do you really understand? They only wanted the plea. The plea automatically puts you into an action of assumpsit debt. you are admitting to being the defendant and abdicating your sovereignty. There are other choices. You can abate the process or demurrer. The judge is a con artist. NEVER PLEA!
Well thodal2000, it seems like the men and women acting as government, don't care about my consent, as their documents require. If that's true, then they believe I'm their subject, and they own me. One guy named judge said he has perosnal juridiction over me.
I make a "special appearance" to rebut the presumption of "general appearance" and avoid falling into their jurisdiction by being there. At most, I get raised eyebrows, but they know what I mean.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
First, Hooray for a system that tolerates this procedural nonsense. If you want to fight traffic laws, run for office. (Then you can get the inside track on the Conspiracy, too.) If you got caught speeding, man up and pay the fine.
What bugs me is people thinking this guy's a "patriot" because he does this stuff. More likely, he's just a wiseguy trying to o beat a traffic ticket through death-by affidavit.
What's next, tricking the judge into stomping on a flaming bag of dogshit?
hessmjj, either you're corrupt or you're too ignorant of the subject to have an opinion. Until you educate yourself you'll continue to be an accomplice to the liars, murderers and thieves that you call the "government".
So...if I don't agree with these courtroom scams I must be corrupt or ignorant. In fact, I don't even get to have an opinion??!! Can't wait to live in your world of True Believers where no other views are tolerated, and contrarians are attacked personally. So much easier thn actually addressing the arguement.
Good work. Keep up the fight and also, I recommend that you start using your name in the vids. Your actions and knowledge are commendable, wear them with pride for the world to see.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You obviously understand the process you are in. It's clear you are just trying to jerk the system around.
You won't change anything this way. But you will waste others' limited, valuable time (damaging OTHERS) in pursuit of your hobby while others sit in court waiting for you to wrap up your challenges.
Bottom Line: If you were speeding, pay the ticket and get the hell out of the way. If you weren't speeding, plead not guilty and challenge the evidence.
clog the court systems, argue every triviality, record everything, and, if you are on a jury for a non-violent case, be sure to use jury nullification. anything you can do to end the functionality of the court system.
Great job Sam, you are a pioneer for the rest of us, everyone that sees this should follow your lead, I plan to if/when I ever get another ticket. Keep up the good work and let us know how it turns out.
Granted I am not a lawyer.. I have vigoursly fought speeding tickets including serving motions to compel discovery. In PA procedural law the motion is considered disposed as soon as the judge is served. That is to say the motion is considered disposed without any further action by the Judge. It may suck but those are the rules. A higher court may find that the judge made an error in disposing your motion. In PA there is no prosecutor for speeding ticket trials.....
So the Judges routinely call and examine witnesses (e.g. they act as the prosecutor) Also many courts in PA dont have a 'record' there is no transcript for the trial and nothing can be entered in to the record. Hmm sounds simliar to Chineese law if you ask me.
Heres how to fight it . Say or do nothing until trial day. show up in court. there will be no prosecutor. (most likely). when the judge attempts to call the office to say ANYTHING at all OBJECT: 'Your honor calling and examing witnesses is the job of the prosecutor, are you now acting as the prosecutor?'
The judge may say: 'Officer Smith is the prosector'
OBJECT 'Your honor officer jones is not certified nor licensed to be a prosecutor in the commonwealth.
The jusge may say 'Fine trail is rescheduled for next tuesday'
OBJECT: Your honor, the people new well in advance that court was schedule for today. If they have come unprepared to court the consiquennses of this lies with the people not the defendant.
Keep objecting (be polite and ask permission since your not a lawyer). If you dont object you automatically consent!
CA. allows the judge to "find facts", so no P.A. is necessary. I had a judge tell me that the State presumes my guilt and it was my priveledge to try to prove my innocence.
Another entered a plea over my objection and told me "You have remedies if you wish to persue them." Nice way of saying, F.U. I'm in charge.
Sorry guys, I've been working out issues in the transcript, and the aspect ratio. All fixed, there's a couple of grammatical issues, but they are corrected for future versions.
No matter what u think of this guy, I'm sure we can agree that this is what independent media has to offer. Actual investigative journalists focused on educating and informing as opposed to "entertaining" and distracting. Great job Sam.
85allthewaylive 2 months ago
This guy is a delusional fool!
missdasiycook 2 months ago
Great job getting the vid and audio on this case. I do have a question for Sam. What if it was assumed that at the time you accepted a benefit (you wouldn't be there unless they already had alleged signed proof that you did...), that you understood the cause and nature of the conditions of that benefit? You had a driver's license correct? Your signature is on the driver license application? Read with a law dictionary, the words you agreed to.
coreyeib 5 months ago
i think that's 'incentivized', not 'incented'. interesting take though, i loathe the bar association and such.
HongPong 6 months ago
Thanks, good video to show us to stand up for our sovereign rights. God Bless.
Tirthapada 8 months ago
great job...bet the ones that voted dislike are "public servants" lol
Treefiddyfo 8 months ago
Great video.
nocoercion 9 months ago
Is there a conclusion to this O.o
killertu 9 months ago
Thank you for this video.
akmrmike 9 months ago
Dude, I think your 15 seconds is up! Go down to Walmart and clean up those carts>
1southernsun 1 year ago
Unintended consequences?
No... they're intended. They're certainly intended.
ApocalypseWatcher 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We can never find justice at the hands of corrupt judges. (See) Judge To Judge On Illegal Payments To Judges. Evil Triangle of Court Corruption. Richard Fine. Dr shirley Moore SBX 211. Now is the time to be heard. The fight to end this title wave of corruption in our country must start with the corrupt judges. Show your support now or wait untill your fate is at the hands of corrupt judges.
danielcooper1000 1 year ago
What does "plead no contest" mean?
Zeamus634 1 year ago
Okay...
Bring an action against the cop and police department for damages caused their exceeding their jurisdiction.
You really kick butt... I wish you had a victory here, and you were more skilled in law, but you have the cajones to make your points and you make them well. You truly are a member of the Press- a real investigative journalist. And you look like you are my age or younger-Bravo.
shadowcii 1 year ago
Did they drop the charges?
byteusa 1 year ago
when entering into the courts you have to know courtroom procedure. Its a game you have to know the rules that why they call it courts.
urbansocial 1 year ago
birth certificates are the devils work
urbansocial 1 year ago
Are lawyers licensed?
worldwidebum 1 year ago
so what ended up happening? U end up paying the fee later?
StcNick 1 year ago
Looks like 6 lawyers has viewed this vid.
poodle55 1 year ago
Balzy guy, playing interesting words games with unusually patient and tolerant court staff. He compared our (deeply flawed) system to China - I wonder if he thinks he could pull this crap in China?
When he left, I wonder if he got into the car for which he acknowledged the state's authority to require licensing and permits, and drove on the roads over property taken against the will of his fellow citizens (as opposed to by mutual agreement)?
Nah, he wouldn't. That would be hypocrisy.
marrazzousa 1 year ago
Too many don't seem to know the difference between Liberty and anarchy.
If everything is supposed to require mutual consent,
then we are to live in anarchy, and our lives then become subject to a perpetual prisoner's dilemma.
What's a "Prisoner's Dilemma? See pespmc1.vub.ac.be/prisdil.html on the web.
marrazzousa 1 year ago
Very good video.
Thank you, all the best to you.
kevinz1985 1 year ago
Nice video. I watched the whole thing.
So how about a follow-up. Did you ever get called back to court? Did you go? Did they find you guilty?
Also, had you been asked, what is it that you were going to say that you didn't understand?
adam1mc 1 year ago
Sam has guts!
ladalang 1 year ago
I'm glad I saw this
UKLooney 1 year ago
Comment removed
TuXeDoMaSk42069 1 year ago
I'm undergoing a similar situation. I live in Bryan TX & I was charged with "failure to wear a seat-belt", but I wrote Non-Assumpsit clearly on the ticket, & since then all the court documents they've handed me I've signed that way as well, but when I went to pre-trial, I basically agreed to a not-guilty plea & set for trial before knowing much of this, so if you have any good advice for me, itd be much appreciated
TuXeDoMaSk42069 1 year ago
Comment removed
TuXeDoMaSk42069 1 year ago
this is happening to me in kansas right now... .and they tried to declare me incompetent, I gave the counselor a history on law, and the constitution. He said that Just because I believe in upholding constitutional rights, does not make me crazy.... so Now I can represent myself. And there will be hell to pay for those bastards.
POWERCROSSING DOT COM
brtras 1 year ago
Are you a lawyer? If not then why are you following all their rules and jumping through all their hoops? You know what I file? A letter sent USPS certificate of mailing. Is the letter double spaced? Nope! If they complain what do I say "If you have a copy of my license to practice law, then I would be very happy for you to produce it. If you cannot produce said license, then too bad! I am in control in these situations. You are not in control. That is why you lose and I win!
ArrestAJudgeKit 1 year ago
Anarchism:
1. The theory or doctrine that all forms of government are oppressive and undesirable and should be abolished.
2. Active resistance and terrorism against the state, as used by some anarchists.
3. Rejection of all forms of coercive control and authority
DougTube69 1 year ago
This dude is awesome!!
kylhul81 1 year ago
Wow! So absolutely powerful this video is! It reminds me of how Indian Rights in Canada are constatnly underminded by the Federal Goverment. Good job and I am so proud of this gentlemen for sticking his neck out for all of us! POWER TO THE PEOPLE!
S.C.X.
meowkid 1 year ago
You're bringing up correct issues in the WRONG 'court' - you're being brought in to an administrative commercial hearing and trying to argue 'the law' - all that applies in an administrative hearing is up to the administrator. Take a look at the def. for a 'court of record' in Black's 4th and start learning how you can easily obtain a remedy when you are being falsely charged with violating codes to which you are not subject (but certain courts act like they're a real court and people buy it)
Possibill 1 year ago
Sam, this was very instructive - thank you for posting it. Here's what I Believe happened in there. As soon as you identified yourself with THE NAME, that is, responded to the judge in the affirmative when your name was called, you created a nexus. A contract. At that point, it does not matter what you say afterwards. You've placed yourself under the courts jurisdiction. You, at that point, "understand." That is, you stand under their jurisdiction. No matter what's said next, you are guilty.
localhero101 1 year ago
UNALIENABLE
colopity 1 year ago
Speeding Ticket = Summary Conviction
You say you don't understand, but you hold a driver's license (contract, and to enter it you agree to 'understand' (STAND UNDER) the highway safety code)
If you 'understand' the invisible contracts, then you will see why they behaved in the fashion they did.
When the officer wrote up that offer for you, if you hold a license you accept it by default, whether or not you physically take it, sign it, rip it up, spit on it, run it over.
mastershakes75 1 year ago
1st sign the ticket 'under duress' that makes it impossible to get a 'failure to appear' unless the judge 'orders you to appear'. The plea gives the court 'jurisdiction' over you. Conditional acceptance is the only way to stay in 'honor'. "I conditionally accept your charge on proof of claim that you can prove jurisdiction over me". File a claim of right ala Rob Menard or Tim Turners Freedom Docs.
If there is no 'injured party" you are under 'color of law' and not LAW.
immafreemann 1 year ago
dude your awesome!
Now the criticism : SOPPY !
You didn't mention a verified claim,black robed administrators,!A Corporation operating under commercial law (offer ,consideration ,acceptance) The "COURTS" must show a contract that is violated to get you into their jurisdiction. This is not a court of law but of Equity ,once they get venue before you allow them to adjudicate it is an Admiralty court .Birth cert is not me ,The judge has the right over your legal fiction which you did not deny???
blowbackinevitable 1 year ago
You are my hero!!!! Thank you
traderash1 2 years ago
Found this from Sam's interview with Marc Stevens on the No State Project radio show. A lot of the things shown here are expressed in Marc's book "Adventures in Legal Land", were Marc goes into a lot more detail, explains the reasons why Judges get upset and stamp their feet like spoilt children when you ask them questions.
OldSmellyCrotch 2 years ago
normally court never allow camera in how do u do that?.
MasterFu 2 years ago 2
it the second amendment freedom of press they actualy arnt suposed to be able to stp said cameras from entering the courts as long as you can prove that you are a member of the press and 2 do that all you need is to have a youtube channel
stantheman42069 2 years ago
our courts are run by criminals
tomanyasses 2 years ago 3
Is this in Keene? What kind of dance classes are you taking Sam? I take swing lessons.
Pazrayna 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You know, you wanted to plead guilty at first so you're obviously guilty of speeding.
Now I think you're just being a pipsqueak trying to cause undue trouble.
You DO understand. It's speeding. If you don't understand speeding then you are a complete idiot.
Rockin2Long 2 years ago
Thank you for posting. good video.
decy22 2 years ago 10
So it's a complicated system to which you don't understand, and you want professionals that do that job, and trained in it to train YOU to defend yourself, at your leisure, outside of the policy of the court. He seems mentally disabled. Is he alright?
DefenderofRoses 2 years ago
Bellamy (1855-1931) adopted the roman salute - a gesture in which the arm is held out forward straight, with palm down - to accompany the American Pledge of Allegiance. Bellamy was not a Nazi. As an admirer of the French Revolution - which meant so much to Jefferson and his friends, 'Liberty, equality, fraternity' - he chose their adoption of the roman salute. For obvious reasons Congress officially adopted the Flag Code with the hand-over-the-heart gesture in 1942.
sheltercrow 2 years ago
Francis Bellamy was a Christian socialist, not a National Socialist. There is a world of difference between the two.
sheltercrow 2 years ago
Good and important video! In December, 2004, I had a similar situation with Judge Jim Boyd and court staff in Prairie Grove District Court in Arkansas, except I didn't bring a camera and the judge did patently threaten me with jail just for asking questions and refusing to sign a Waiver Of Right To Counsel.
kinleyhard 2 years ago
Brilliant video. Very approachable, no matter how far down the rabbit hole you are.
Thank you for posting.
brizzlie 2 years ago
"Bureaucrats are basically good people" ... I disagree. What's good about stupidity? Nothing. They are theives, whether it's due to stupidity or malevolence is of no consequence. If they simply didn't understand but also hadn't taken action, it would be forgivable. But that's not the case. They don't understand what they are doing, but they have chosen to initiate force against us all. That is unacceptable.
libertarianjury 2 years ago
Did you just miss the point, while at the same time making it? I beleive he refers to the their intention, not what they are. You are correct in "they don't understand what they are doing" (I hope). The positive thing that Sam has perfect clarity on is that; When good people who beleive they are doing right, find they are mistaken, they change. Sam, I beleive is working towards that definition of change.
AngryHateMusic 2 years ago
Rather than say "all men are created equally" I would just state: "all men are equal under the law". This eliminates idiotic religious memes and ambiguity of meaning. Such things confuse the sheep, and we're trying to get the sheep to run interference for us, at minimum, if not stampede in our chosen direction. It's hard to get them on our side if they're confused about the best possible meaning of the terms. (Did god try just as hard to create me as he did my neighbor? Duhhrr...)
libertarianjury 2 years ago
Loved it, but cheesy song at the end kinda ruined your message a tad.
Snoopyloop2343 2 years ago
Outstanding video !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ed2276 2 years ago
excellent legal primer. THANK YOU!
RosenKrantz666 2 years ago 2
"This court is fraudulent
(Silence)
You see it don't you?"
Wonderful, unbelievable, a hero in our times. THANK YOU!
jaralero 2 years ago 3
Yes, but it's kind of like saying "this Italian Mafia in Chicago is fraudulent!!"
Or, "this huge pile of fresh feces in the middle of the living room sure stinks!!"
furyofbongos 2 years ago
Wow.
A moving look at voluntarism, the inefficiency and irrationality of the state, and the personal strength of character of one righteous dude.
ToothpickMcBrainy 2 years ago 6
The brilliant and courageous man who created and stars in this video was arrested the other day for daring to question an unsigned sheet of paper ordering people not to film in court or a public lobby of a court despite NH law that says cameras are to be allowed in courtrooms. Google "free keene" to learn more at the Free Keene blog and Google "CD evolution" to find out how you can help.
AnarchyInYourHead 2 years ago 3
All he has to do is remember who he is...the court was referring to his ALL CAPS name,or his legal fiction if u will...all he had to do was say,i do not consent and i waive all benefits...game over....everything they do to you in their courtrooms is merely an offer....thanks but no thanks sir :)
TartanBhoy1980 2 years ago
Check out thinkfreeforums....The Truth Shall Set You Free!!
TartanBhoy1980 2 years ago
Yep, fiction... when i worked for the gov, I was fired after refusing to assist in the embezzlement of a LOT of money... mandatory admin meetings at a school district featured smart alecks bragging about ideas to force public schools to watch pornography... my last job, next to the justice dept in the gov complex, turned out to be a front for cocaine distribution... this is just the surface... medical fraud is the biggest one...
cusanusnicolas 2 years ago
The court system is symbolism . Very evil. And very corrupt
To learn more about how this system of fraud works
Search Jordan Maxwell you shall be amazed
Most Sitting judges have stocks in the prison system
The prison systems is ran by the Christian people
Or jacked Mormons. New world order is on its way
hold on America you're in for quite a surprise
CANZEENSO 2 years ago
yes that is a conflict of interest i know the system inside out state law is no more confusing than coal mine or diamond mine for that matter thats what it comes down to your right no contest
rob peter to pay paul
lbuggold 2 years ago
I do agree, though, that instating the pledge of allegiance in schools as a requirment is, as Gore Vidal says, "importing fascism." But to call a consciencious Christian socialist like Bellamy a Nazi is total distortion and slander.
hatchbx 3 years ago
you're either misinformed or completely disingenuous to conflate Bellamy's Christain Socialism with Nazism. That's absurd. Just because Nazis appropriated the same hand salute doesn't make the ideologies synonymous. Nazi fascism, racism, and ethnocentricy are not intrinsic to socialism.
hatchbx 3 years ago
Habeous Corpus has nothing to do with it. He wasn't being held. That bit just made him look stupid. Understanding the nature of the charge is the first hurdle. I won't tell you the two facts about that that you obviously don't know. I suggest you do something else with your life. What you are doing here is fruitless and you are going to get yourself into a situation that you won't believe and that there's no getting out of. I know you won't listen, but you'll wish you had.
afewgoodclips 3 years ago
It's not fruitless, he is exposing a system that people need to change. If everyone did this it would HAVE to change.
djBUTT3RFLY 3 years ago 2
well...did they drop the charge? Great advice and use of knowledge of the laws. The court system today takes advantage of the lack of knowledge held by many people sitting in the hot seat.
b87gr 3 years ago
yes been to court and it's a joke!! they all corrupts!
sodasoap 3 years ago
the only difference between a prosecutor and a judge is the presence of a gavel. other than that, they're all pigs rolling around in the same filth getting their paychecks from the same source.
yinyangdynasty 3 years ago
So if the judge had said "ok what do you want to know" then what do you say?
zppz 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You were speeding and now your getting taxed. Fuck outta here.
crackface2 3 years ago
Is this Civil? Probably not because he said he was detained by the police.
He was supposed to have a lawyer provided for him if this was criminal and involved the police. Thats the person who explains the charges
darcskies777 3 years ago
They are calling it criminal, and have told me over and over to go pay for one of their lawyers, who will only present options the court wants.
It's such a hopelessly flawed system. Private competing arbitration services will go a long way to end this kind of corruption, malfeasance and outright contempt for customers.
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
Sam is a hero.
gbates31 3 years ago 4
Sam - have you filed charges against the judge yet for obstructing justice? You should file them with the district attorney that is above him. Follow the Randy Kelton method and you can really give them a run for their money.
stevergee 3 years ago
I'm going to look at that and one other option I'm considering. I'll probably call his show and discuss it with him.
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
I think you can really get to the next level as soveriegn individual under the rule of law, by bringing the charges to their door step. they slapped with a charge based on their leagl fictions, now it's your turn bind them to the constitution using the thier oath of office, and rack up real violations on them, get them fighting with each other and force them to recognize the real law they are supposed to be obeying.
stevergee 3 years ago
Sam, I've heard you on FTL and watched this and some of your other videos. I *so* envy your courage and knowledge! Actually I think I have the courage, but without the knowledge or ability to reason or good communication skills (all of which you apparently have) I wouldn't get very far and my experience wouldn't be a good display to educate anyone. Thank you so much for your courage and action, and your well-written documentary.
mcmikemn 3 years ago
Thanks. All you have to do is start small. Begin to question authority and the "have to-s. . ." in life.
I'm discussing this on the ASR forums, this s a note to let them know, yes, it's really me. :) I think it will be an interesting discussion, and I hope to learn a few things from the black community's perspective.
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
Cont'd: You already caught the judge as entering a not guilty plea that only a representative can do. From there on out, I'd just play it cool, as even in a jury trial of your peers should be able to discern what's going on. Have any seen adventures in legal land? He kind of does the same thing at pretrial.
bigbadmuthafukkah 3 years ago
Still loving this video.
mport1 3 years ago
Not to criticize, but to clarify, as soon as you stood where the judge told you to stand, i believe you submited to his authority
earthicastar 3 years ago 2
Fair comment, and I understand what you are saying.
He wanted me right in the center so the lighting, symbol, etc. all worked in his favor. I suggested we sit at the table as equals, and he backed down.
I remained on the left side of the bench, so I didn't actually stand where he wanted.
Later at his do-over pretrial, I sat down in the chair. He had the bailiff escort me to the bench. :) Nice people.
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
Iain1962 your reply tells me you are a cop. Or you do not know the law or your rights. The court you are being tried in is an admiralty court, which they have no right to try you in. If they do not have a signed statement from an injured party then you haven't broken any COMMON LAW, which is what we are to be judged upon. Far from a waste of time. I fought for 5 months and ny case was dismissed.
SpikeTimmons 3 years ago
Yeah bit of waste of effort, but it sure is fun tieing small time officials up in knots of logic.
I do it too, especially with call centres man I hate those places.
Iain1962 3 years ago
How was it a waste?
conspiracist 3 years ago
Well where did it get him? He annoyed a whole bunch of people just doing their jobs, who can't change anything, and ends up with a court case just the same.
I see the point but this is attacking the symptom not the disease. If you really want things to change you have to attack the system not the pawns just doing their jobs, they aren't going to say, "OK you're right let's just forget the whole thing."
Iain1962 3 years ago 2
I understand attacking the system this way is only marginally effective, changes little, and costs more time than it's worth.
Do you understand the video itself is designed to challenging the viewers belief system. This will bring about the change I want. Competing private arbitration services, with no group holding a monopoly on the perceived legitimate initiation of force.
What's your solution/suggestion? I'm always looking for something more effective.
obscuredtruth 3 years ago 2
Haha, I'm not a cop.
I would have limited my objections to the judge. Perhaps challenged his very authority, but messing around with the pawns in the system doesn't get you anywhere, they are just following instructions.
Instead of "fighting" them you want them on your side, try and convert those guys in a nice way.
That's my opinion anyway.
Good job though I suppose if everybody did this they would have to change things, unfortunately there are just way too many sheep.
Iain1962 3 years ago
>Good job though I suppose if everybody did this they would have to change things,
Probably for the worse. The judicial branch is the only branch left still defending the US public. When people tie up the system like this, the judicial branch might decide to take even more short cuts. My suggestion is, since you already caught the judge as fraud, you should have entered a not guilty plea, trial by jury, and then show the footage in court, or transcribe it. I enjoyed the video, tho. Very brave.
bigbadmuthafukkah 3 years ago
obscuredtruth, YOUR ROCK!
MrHolipsism 3 years ago
Sam - this stuff is fascinating. I am curious about the questions that you wanted to ask the judge. What were the questions? And what is happening now in this case?
stevergee 3 years ago
they try to get YOU to PLEA
because in law there is a maxim[ultimate truth] thayt ''he who begs is presumed to know WHAT for he begs]
your PLEA is bewgging [in pleading you beg them into higher standing [to stand OVER you
a lawyer is a SERVANT of the court, meaning he is UNDER the court standingm a lawyer can ONLY represent a NOn person[legally only a corps[corperation]
thos who dont know the law wil be standing UNDER it[paying bribes for statuted transgression's not lawfull transgressions
oneundergod 3 years ago
when you obeyed his 'order' he got supiriour standing over you
note earlier the 'clerk said to ask the judge
[if you do you loose your higher standing [thus fall UNDER his juristiction
when he asks do you UNDERstand
again its about legal STANDING [giving him HIGHER standing allows him to judge you a lessor being as he sees fit]
courts work on standing , all they do is to get us to submit UNDER their standing
simply responding allows them to win, asking questions stops them declaring it
oneundergod 3 years ago 2
our justice works on CONtract law
when you GET a contract it is a bill,the bill could be moneytised[recognised for value;turning it into a security and case closed.But schools dont teach us the rules!
So we go to court to find the CONSTITUTION dosnt COUNT in COURTS[we have a colour of law [rule] that works CONTRACT law]
The issued bill wasnt paid [simple buisness LAW]you either prove THERE was NO servic[thus NO victim]by claiming standing as THE injured party or allow the lie,most just pay
oneundergod 3 years ago
V, Name ONE person who was murdered for "not cooperating". Based on what I heard in the video, the court did not even find this putz in contempt of court for "not cooperating".
You already seem to have a hobby. Now, get a life.
hessmij 3 years ago
Is your position so flawed you must resort to personal attacks rather than responding to questions?
Name one? Mr. Carrion, an air force vet shot 3 times by Ivory Webb for following his orders. There's even google video. Or the guy in NC shot 5 times after they tased him and he was throwing up on the ground, or how about. . Are you seriously this indoctrinated or completely ignorant?
Your judge tried to levy contempt, I just looked at him and his silly piece of paper, and he changed his mind.
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
It's not MY position that leads me to personal attacks. (It's more YOUR position that does; calling people who don't agree with you "statist", ignorant and corrupt.)
So these people were shot by "the system" and not by individual assholes abusing their power? How wrong to elevate instances to systemic. BTW. Won't there be violence in "your" world as the strong take advantage of the weak? So naive.
Wow. You just LOOKED at the judge and he changed his mind. Pretty oppressive system.
hessmij 3 years ago
Ah, your saying I make you lash out in personal attacks. Tell me hessmij, do you always let other people control your emotions, or is it just me? I was unaware I had this power over you.
The system is flawed by design, has dishonest incentives, and it's devoid of market signals.
And No, Your judge looked at me when I didn't take his form like a good little subject, as he commanded. He circled the floor in his black dress a couple of times, and then decided later to "rescind the matter"
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
Obscured, I'm sure you realize you have the "power" to make others think you are a putz for demanding the court explain the nature and cause of a speeding ticket (see Wagnog below if you are still having a hard time with this). You're still calling people ignorant and/or corrupt for not agreeing with you. (Don't assume that they don't 'get' your position.)
Your outcome in court is the best arguement against you. You walked away. Not a murder victim of the State.
Watch your speed.
hessmij 3 years ago
I'm calling you ignorant, because after all these posts you have yet to correctly state my position. The PROCEEDINGS, not the charge genius. I asked earlier, but you didn't answer.
Of course Big government authoritarian statists like you don't have to listen (gov. has no incentive to provide customer service) there too busy telling everyone else what do do.
I'll drive at a safe speed based on my judgment, thank you. I'm not your servant to order around sir.
obscuredtruth 3 years ago 2
What is not to understand?
Newsflash: you are charged with speeding, you have the right to a trial by a finder of fact, the penalty is fines and points.
Habeous corpus is being exercised, you are being called before a court and can have a trial.
He is entering a plea because you aren't. Nature of your proceeding = speeding ticket
Cause = state believed you were speeding.
I just wasted 20 minutes of my day.
wagnog2 3 years ago
I want to understand the proceedings, the role these people assume in the actions they are bringing against me, and how they attained the authority to initiate force against me.
Do I need to understand the proceedings? Why don't they hold court in another language? (oh wait, they do, legal ease) Habeous Corpus includes the proceedings sir.
Otherwise, why do I need to even be there?
If I'm not to understand, and they can enter a plea, what am I there for?
(Other than to make it look good)
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
You are free to research the info you are looking for in your comment in any library. It's not the court's job to educate you.
hessmij 3 years ago
You didn't answer the question. Not surprising, as most statists don't want to face questions about the legitimacy of their actions.
Let me ask again, Should the state be able to make up some complex process you don't understand, refuse to explain it to you, and make threats against your person and/or property? Is that a legitimate way to do business?
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
I understand where this guy is coming from, but a privatized court system? That could never work, because the only court that has the power to actually enforce its decisions is state/federal court.
MalikKillian 3 years ago
I can appreciate your skepticism, it's a complete shift in thinking from everything we have today.
There's a great free audio book that describes how society would function in the absence of government mandated services.
It's called The Market for Liberty and you can get it free at book*freekeene*com
I highly recommend it.
Samiam
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
There are hundreds of "non governmental" courts. It's called arbitration / ejudication. If you have a workers comp claim, Unemployment insurance claim, and several others that I can't think of. You agree to them BEFORE hand and sign a waiver stating such.
kmikesell 2 years ago
what's the difference? now we've got zionistic neo-cons running the show.
synthpopclassics 3 years ago
The court should be renamed, "The Court of Public Miscreants/Frauds," referring to those 'public' a-bombs who contort and mess with the same laws they have 'sworn' to abide by and defend.
teejay1618 3 years ago
Are you sure Francis Bellamy was a Nazi?? It says here he was a Christian Socialist, and the pledge was written in 1892. I'm pretty sure there were no Nazis there. Did someone fuck up on wiki?
Whoo69 3 years ago
You know the school children used to do a roman salute to the flag. You know, Hail Hitler, click the heels, the whole works.
I pledge allegiance to the flag? (symbol of the state)
And to the republic (A bit nationalistic don't you think?)
One nation under god (separation of church and state, didn't Hitler use religion to push his agenda?)
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
Excellent work Sam.
Just don't push it to the point where you can't make it to NH. We need guys like you.
Puke0010 3 years ago
When Sam says "You see it don't you?" at around 31 minutes I almost got teary!
What a moment :)
cheesenightmare 3 years ago
thnx alot i mean i really appreciate this
u shuld b president
dmarcusmilez 3 years ago
I think you should watch the ending again. I'm not interested in ruling others; I want freedom! :)
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
If You enjoyed this video please share it with others by clicking on the Digg link in the show's description.
FreeKeene 3 years ago
+5 for excellent production values, and for overall ballsiness.
Bound4NH 3 years ago 3
you can file an interlockatory injuction because he entered a plea on your behalf and violated his oath of office.
Tactikalguy1 3 years ago
Awesome!!! I don't know if you will come out on top of this, but I see you point of view and applaud your efforts at the top of my voice. 5 stars!!!!!
Josiah531 3 years ago
These are actions of ASSUMPSIT debt in a court of no record (inferior court).80% there isn't even a sworn statement to even start a case. They CON people and scare ppl.. They have 1000's of ways to get your consent through your silence.
B4 there is ever a plea you can.
1.Abate the action ,
2.Demurrer,
3.Demand a court of record (your are the sovereign) which follows the common law (no legal fictions or statutes)
4. Set-off (statutes are a debt to "society")
I could go on but...
thodal2000 3 years ago
I'll look into the other options, but Demurrer is prohibited in TX. Send me a PM if you can point me to a good resource, as I have 2 more I'm working now.
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
BRILLIANT !!!.... belief its a killer!!
sk8ingonfire 3 years ago
Inspiring. Thank you.
jcastillo81 3 years ago
Pass this on to as many people as possible.
mport1 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The judge enters a plea because you are innocent until proven guilty. Are you guilty or not? You are clearly a very angry person, and this is a very dull video. People are being genuinely wronged all around the world, and you can't take your medicine. Grow up.
mirkinboy 3 years ago
Talk about missing the point.
Yeah, people are being wronged. And sheeple like yourself are the ones propping bad systems up.
bonkers45 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't think I've missed a single validly made point here. Granted the justice system is flawed, just like any man-made system, but comparing American democracy to the Chinese legal system, please, are you serious?
mirkinboy 3 years ago
The judge is not allowed to enter a plea on the behalf of the defendant, because he does not represent the defendant.
The defendant wanted to understand the nature and consequences of the charges against him. The judge was unwilling to oblige him with an explanation.
mirkinboy, I think you don't get it. The plea entered FOR the defendant, without the defendant receiving the aforementioned explanation, IS largely the point of this video, questioning the courts authority.
I liked this video!
mottoncouthUSA 3 years ago 4
Do you really understand? They only wanted the plea. The plea automatically puts you into an action of assumpsit debt. you are admitting to being the defendant and abdicating your sovereignty. There are other choices. You can abate the process or demurrer. The judge is a con artist. NEVER PLEA!
thodal2000 3 years ago
Well thodal2000, it seems like the men and women acting as government, don't care about my consent, as their documents require. If that's true, then they believe I'm their subject, and they own me. One guy named judge said he has perosnal juridiction over me.
Hopefully I have this all wrong? :)
obscuredtruth 3 years ago 2
I make a "special appearance" to rebut the presumption of "general appearance" and avoid falling into their jurisdiction by being there. At most, I get raised eyebrows, but they know what I mean.
dus777 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
First, Hooray for a system that tolerates this procedural nonsense. If you want to fight traffic laws, run for office. (Then you can get the inside track on the Conspiracy, too.) If you got caught speeding, man up and pay the fine.
What bugs me is people thinking this guy's a "patriot" because he does this stuff. More likely, he's just a wiseguy trying to o beat a traffic ticket through death-by affidavit.
What's next, tricking the judge into stomping on a flaming bag of dogshit?
hessmij 3 years ago
hessmjj, either you're corrupt or you're too ignorant of the subject to have an opinion. Until you educate yourself you'll continue to be an accomplice to the liars, murderers and thieves that you call the "government".
veee4vendetta 3 years ago 2
So...if I don't agree with these courtroom scams I must be corrupt or ignorant. In fact, I don't even get to have an opinion??!! Can't wait to live in your world of True Believers where no other views are tolerated, and contrarians are attacked personally. So much easier thn actually addressing the arguement.
hessmij 3 years ago
Indeed, if you support any part of a "government" that acquires it's funding through threat of murder than you must be either corrupt or ignorant.
Don't even respond with the "they don't threaten to murder" argument. If you insist on not cooperating, they will murder you.
veee4vendetta 3 years ago 3
Excellent documentary. Spread this everywhere.
mport1 3 years ago 3
Good work. Keep up the fight and also, I recommend that you start using your name in the vids. Your actions and knowledge are commendable, wear them with pride for the world to see.
freedommv1 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You obviously understand the process you are in. It's clear you are just trying to jerk the system around.
You won't change anything this way. But you will waste others' limited, valuable time (damaging OTHERS) in pursuit of your hobby while others sit in court waiting for you to wrap up your challenges.
Bottom Line: If you were speeding, pay the ticket and get the hell out of the way. If you weren't speeding, plead not guilty and challenge the evidence.
hessmij 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
+1 karma
playermoh 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
to hessmij
playermoh 3 years ago
Translation: obey or ELSE!
Taors 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
AN'GEL, n. Usually pronounced angel, but most anomalously. [L. angelus; Gr. a messenger, to tell or announce.]
1. Literally, a messenger; one employed to communicate news or information from one person to another at a distance. But appropriately,
I have seen the salvation of God in a Courtroom.
Had I not listened to the Judge, I would have missed it.
Proverbs 3:5
Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
YOU ARE YOUR OWN WORST ENEMY
playermoh 3 years ago
Wow! Fantastic job man!
ronpaulrevolution 3 years ago
your a true patriot man
glitcher808 3 years ago
Great work and very interesting. I look forward to hearing updates on Freetalklive!
steven84123 3 years ago 2
great work!
clog the court systems, argue every triviality, record everything, and, if you are on a jury for a non-violent case, be sure to use jury nullification. anything you can do to end the functionality of the court system.
junior00bacon00chee 3 years ago 5
Great job Sam, you are a pioneer for the rest of us, everyone that sees this should follow your lead, I plan to if/when I ever get another ticket. Keep up the good work and let us know how it turns out.
kjaylong 3 years ago
Nice work Sam. I see green digital numbers & letters falling in a downward spiral (matrix)when I hear u on FTL & watched the video.
jstewjrome 3 years ago
The ending was so freaking COOL! almost made me wanna cry. Great Video cant wait to show this to everybody i know :)
keep up the great work!
weresmyass 3 years ago 3
Nice.
Similar to Marc Stevens "Adventures In Legal Land", those who appreciate Sam here will appreciate Marc as well (on Youtube, user "MarcStevens3").
simonjeste 3 years ago
This all started with MArc's Script, and has taken a slightly different route. I've spoken with Marc a couple of times.
obscuredtruth 3 years ago
Hey Man! Keep it up!
mostradicalmanever 3 years ago 2
just make a paypal link and we the freedom seekers will help you out..... see you in New Hampshire some day
paulienet 3 years ago 3
Judges can consider your motion disposed without taking any action.. Common procedural law. I appreciate your veracity though.
FUMrBush99 3 years ago
Understood. Can you explain why the exact same motions file in another court WERE answered?
(well responded to at least, they didn't answer much)
Kinda makes me go Hummm. . . .
obscuredtruth 3 years ago 2
Granted I am not a lawyer.. I have vigoursly fought speeding tickets including serving motions to compel discovery. In PA procedural law the motion is considered disposed as soon as the judge is served. That is to say the motion is considered disposed without any further action by the Judge. It may suck but those are the rules. A higher court may find that the judge made an error in disposing your motion. In PA there is no prosecutor for speeding ticket trials.....
FUMrBush99 3 years ago
So the Judges routinely call and examine witnesses (e.g. they act as the prosecutor) Also many courts in PA dont have a 'record' there is no transcript for the trial and nothing can be entered in to the record. Hmm sounds simliar to Chineese law if you ask me.
FUMrBush99 3 years ago
Heres how to fight it . Say or do nothing until trial day. show up in court. there will be no prosecutor. (most likely). when the judge attempts to call the office to say ANYTHING at all OBJECT: 'Your honor calling and examing witnesses is the job of the prosecutor, are you now acting as the prosecutor?'
The judge may say: 'Officer Smith is the prosector'
OBJECT 'Your honor officer jones is not certified nor licensed to be a prosecutor in the commonwealth.
FUMrBush99 3 years ago
The jusge may say 'Fine trail is rescheduled for next tuesday'
OBJECT: Your honor, the people new well in advance that court was schedule for today. If they have come unprepared to court the consiquennses of this lies with the people not the defendant.
Keep objecting (be polite and ask permission since your not a lawyer). If you dont object you automatically consent!
Now go get em!!!!!!!!!
FUMrBush99 3 years ago
CA. allows the judge to "find facts", so no P.A. is necessary. I had a judge tell me that the State presumes my guilt and it was my priveledge to try to prove my innocence.
Another entered a plea over my objection and told me "You have remedies if you wish to persue them." Nice way of saying, F.U. I'm in charge.
dus777 3 years ago
Ha you thought municpal courts are rule of law. Dream on sucker. The Judges are mostly bad lawers turned Alchoholics.
FUMrBush99 3 years ago
Sorry guys, I've been working out issues in the transcript, and the aspect ratio. All fixed, there's a couple of grammatical issues, but they are corrected for future versions.
FreeKeene 3 years ago
Looks the same, but I wonder the same thing.
Jitgos 3 years ago
I like this video, but why have you uploaded this 3 times?
is this copy different from the 1st?
SuperAtheist 3 years ago