I don't think any of these involved hydrazine. The explosions were much too spectacular to be hydrazine. Except for the solid-fueled Minuteman, they all looked like kerosene and LOX.
Titans used hydrazine as the fuel and nitrogen tetraoxide as the oxidizer. No ignition system required. Kinda dangerous, but we didn't lose any Gemini missions as I recall.
The rocket at 0:23 was an Atlas with "balloon tanks" which use fuel pressure as its primary structure. Any drop in pressure or miscalculation of required pressure would cause the rocket to collapse under its own weight. Almost certainly, thats what happened there. But still, a curious design..
@porkyfry Hey! Guess what, this is SLC-4W on Vandenberg Air Force Base when they used launch atlases in the 60's. Now they retired it after the Titan 2s. And it is made of light aluminium, good question though. If it was made of steel, it would be too heavy
The booster fuel tank had a leaking valve and it lost pressure. The Atlas had light weight "balloon" tanks which required air pressure to keep them rigid, loss of that pressure led to collapse.
I think if the warhead had exploded separately the camera would have been destroyed along with any trace of the launch site. The only warheads these generally carry are nuclear. Know what you mean though, there were some pretty nasty explosions on there =]
The one with the Atlas-Agena...I understand that the Atlas' skin was intentionally so thin that it literally had to be inflated with fuel to support its own weight. I guess this is what happens if it isn't inflated properly.
Well actually there is something called Mission Control Center, where a series of switches and buttons are thrown and pressed, causing sevral ignighters to light the fuel chamber, which causes the fuel to burn, causing thrust. These tests were probably the failed rocket launch attempts made in the 60's for all of the Appollo missions.
And as a note the crash at :45 was the most common type of crash as the rocket would tip, causing all of the fuel to ignite, or expode.
This is what I get for trying to be funny. The earlier missiles (Thor and Atlas) had miserable records. Thor had problems with fuel delivery (turbo pump failure usually.) Atlas had a myriad of problems the most pronounced was the guidance system. These were modified ballistic missiles, (Except for the Minuteman III at the end)so adapting them to deliver a sub-orbital payload was hit or miss at best.
In commemoration of the 30th anniversary of the Star Wars franchise a rocketeer named Andy Woerner, with the help of his rocketry club members, has built a 21 foot long replica of the X-Wing Fighter that will actually fly on four rocket motors in the scale engine locations. For more info check out 3dub d/ot plasterblaster d/ot com/projects d/ot html.
"Our rockets always explode" was the phrase back in 1960. It was a given that the Soviet Union was way ahead. The "Missle Gap" was a household name. Think we live in scary times now?
Today's liquid-based rockets are made with such thin margins that they have to be pressurized to hold up their own weight. Just like you can stand on a closed Coke can, but you can crush an open one.
That rocket that fell over was a static test article of the Atlas-Agena vehicle. Atlas vehicles were extremely thin-skinned, and had to be pressurized in order to maintain its shape. That vehicle was full of sand, thankfully, and not live propellant!
The last one seems to be an ICBM... it wouldn't be nice if this happened with one with the nuclear warheads installed... of course if armed ICBMs had to be launched, the whole situation would be beyond "not nice"...
"UFO Disclosure A Global Deception Conspiracy " ON
YOUTUBE is a revelation of with held knowledge from the public of life
beyond Earth. The video compilation contains statements from astronauts,
American presidents, military personnel, politicians plus credible news
footage regarding awareness of life beyond Earth along with it's
current and ongoing presence which is being hidden from the masses + more.
Futurecop2012E 7 months ago
0:22 I think this is what the real hell looks like.
meteor4163 1 year ago
Viagra needed.
Sugarsail1 1 year ago 2
Lol that first rocket just didnt want to get out of bed
TreesOfBaylor 1 year ago
Oh ya, and as stated bellow, it is using the balloon tank concept. I dont need to explain
tdbf2142 1 year ago
lol
TheBigDolphin1 1 year ago
fail!!! =)
whydiewhenyoucanlive 1 year ago
Rockets that fell into nigerian scam
chaztin 2 years ago
They selfdestructed the last one. As soon at it angle 5 degrees past normal it selfs destructs for safety reasons.
regcer 2 years ago
That one at 0:23 just fell apart for some unexplained reason. They probably built that one out of drywall (sheetrock type material.)
elkinsinbox 2 years ago
lol
chromecrescent 2 years ago
it was an atlas missile which is built using a "balloon tank"
concept. pressure in the tank must be maintained or what you saw will occur.
heathirving 2 years ago
Made in North Korea LOL.
2mad4peace 2 years ago
holy hell. epic!
HellRemains666 2 years ago
You should have included the V2 mishaps.
Of course, rocketry is a dangerous business. You really need to be a rocket scientist to do it successfully.
dangerouslytalented 2 years ago 2
thats sad why did they make the rocet in 0:23 they r like owning LIFE
pinkqoh 3 years ago
Heh, the last one went higher and straighter in pieces than it did when it was actually a whole rocket.
Anticyclonic 3 years ago
the last one iz coool
fantactical 3 years ago
I don't think any of these involved hydrazine. The explosions were much too spectacular to be hydrazine. Except for the solid-fueled Minuteman, they all looked like kerosene and LOX.
philkarn 3 years ago
Titans used hydrazine as the fuel and nitrogen tetraoxide as the oxidizer. No ignition system required. Kinda dangerous, but we didn't lose any Gemini missions as I recall.
jn678 2 years ago
The Titan II (Gemini) used Aerozine-50 (50% hydrazine, 50% UDMH) plus N2O4. The Titan I was kerosene/LOX.
Gemini VI could have been a disaster. It cut off on the pad and could have fallen over, but Schirra did not eject.
philkarn 2 years ago
umm... ouch....
solomen2345 3 years ago
i don't want to fly in a rocket anymore :(
khakivideos 3 years ago 3
Whoa, I was listening to Man In The Box by Alice In Chains when watching this...fit very, very perfectly.
Capum5 3 years ago
haha, whoever made the rocket at :23 needs to be fired. What, did they make it out of paper?
porkyfry 3 years ago 9
you are right
and the first one wasn't a picnic either
lkpcs 3 years ago 2
The rocket at 0:23 was an Atlas with "balloon tanks" which use fuel pressure as its primary structure. Any drop in pressure or miscalculation of required pressure would cause the rocket to collapse under its own weight. Almost certainly, thats what happened there. But still, a curious design..
bikingchad 3 years ago
@porkyfry Hey! Guess what, this is SLC-4W on Vandenberg Air Force Base when they used launch atlases in the 60's. Now they retired it after the Titan 2s. And it is made of light aluminium, good question though. If it was made of steel, it would be too heavy
tdbf2142 1 year ago
@tdbf2142 Atlas was made of 303 stainless steel in the tank sections - from .017 to
.040 inch thicknesses.
artwleb 1 year ago
@porkyfry
The booster fuel tank had a leaking valve and it lost pressure. The Atlas had light weight "balloon" tanks which required air pressure to keep them rigid, loss of that pressure led to collapse.
USAmerican100 4 months ago
@porkyfry Shhhhh...The paper rocket was CLASSIFIED!!
thetrashyboy 3 months ago
yeah i did
yesturtle 3 years ago
did anyone see the warhead fall off and then explode after the rest did?
skullxer 3 years ago
I think if the warhead had exploded separately the camera would have been destroyed along with any trace of the launch site. The only warheads these generally carry are nuclear. Know what you mean though, there were some pretty nasty explosions on there =]
jimyjim36 3 years ago
I have heard that if the rocket is going off course or going to be a danger, controllers "self destruct" them.
XmegaPresident 3 years ago
He accidently put it on reverse on the first clip :S
WoWaddict3d 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you dont put rockets in reverse dumb shit
Reds1500 3 years ago
lol '0:30'
dtuetujetui 3 years ago 2
The funniest was the one that just bent in half. I bet they were glad it didn't burn up the launch site. Perhaps it was a test shell.
aremisasling 4 years ago
the last one was the best.
Parkinson9999 4 years ago
yup
dryrun79 4 years ago
uh oh spagettio! D=
BoboVicus 4 years ago 7
Where did that line get famous from?
richardwhat 4 years ago
Don't ask me lol
BoboVicus 4 years ago
wasnt it simpsons? hehe
but wow poor rocket XD
joyjoyooO 4 years ago
Spaghetti "O's"-- get it? You know, the canned "Spaghetti O's?" The commercial? "Uh-oh, Spaghetti O's" That was there trademark for Spaghetti O's!
roughrider040 4 years ago
oopsie
hippie0man 4 years ago
The one with the Atlas-Agena...I understand that the Atlas' skin was intentionally so thin that it literally had to be inflated with fuel to support its own weight. I guess this is what happens if it isn't inflated properly.
PonyExpressNYC 4 years ago 2
Atlas was gas pressurized to maintain shape with or without
propellants on board...made of stainless steel with thcknesses of .017 to .040 inches. Amazing manufacturing feat.
artwleb 4 years ago
lol?
Samuelgames 4 years ago
lol at :23
pannono 4 years ago
Details:
1) Thor at Cape Canaveral 1957 thrust decay
2) Atlas at VAFB October 1963 one engine failed to ignite
3) Atlas-Agena at VAFB May 1963 prelaunch tests with dummy second stage
4) Minuteman at VAFB date?
artwleb 4 years ago
They proberly get used to it failing from time to time... "allright, who's fault was it this time?"
Greaselburger 4 years ago
I feel bad for the guy that's got to run up and light the fuse...
crispycritterz 4 years ago
Well actually there is something called Mission Control Center, where a series of switches and buttons are thrown and pressed, causing sevral ignighters to light the fuel chamber, which causes the fuel to burn, causing thrust. These tests were probably the failed rocket launch attempts made in the 60's for all of the Appollo missions.
And as a note the crash at :45 was the most common type of crash as the rocket would tip, causing all of the fuel to ignite, or expode.
cloudedsky56 4 years ago
This is what I get for trying to be funny. The earlier missiles (Thor and Atlas) had miserable records. Thor had problems with fuel delivery (turbo pump failure usually.) Atlas had a myriad of problems the most pronounced was the guidance system. These were modified ballistic missiles, (Except for the Minuteman III at the end)so adapting them to deliver a sub-orbital payload was hit or miss at best.
crispycritterz 4 years ago
lol are u being sarcastic?
swampo1212 4 years ago
lol @ the first one
usually when we build things to launch, they have more thrust than weight?
i guess... not?
bri3d 4 years ago
great balls of fire! :P
kryk101 4 years ago
fire in a hole... somebody just shooting me with rockets...
aimtitanspunk 4 years ago
lol
steviesmasher 4 years ago
1 & 1/2 seconds in, Scientist are all like
"Oh, F"
gnarlydan 4 years ago
one small mistake of a man, one big explosion for us!
Antonie112 4 years ago
In commemoration of the 30th anniversary of the Star Wars franchise a rocketeer named Andy Woerner, with the help of his rocketry club members, has built a 21 foot long replica of the X-Wing Fighter that will actually fly on four rocket motors in the scale engine locations. For more info check out 3dub d/ot plasterblaster d/ot com/projects d/ot html.
rnech 4 years ago
fire meet rocket fuel
stonerlad25 4 years ago
huston we have a problem
hobofreakchild 4 years ago
lol tht was some bad explosion... feel sorry for the pplz tht built it, were inside it and tht pplz round it... =[, but funny
valleycolts2 4 years ago
gosh at 33 seconds - thats embarrassing
Defender78 4 years ago
LOLOLOLOL
heysafilikefruits2XD 4 years ago
This should be renamed "Rocket Launch Bloopers"
crazygrainger2006 4 years ago
Sweet, I've always wanted to see video of that Minuteman III explosion.
MFCBastion 4 years ago
Hehehe, god I remember the brush fires those things caused. Great memories! Thanks for sharing these!
goney3 4 years ago
third one is just pathetic :/
ewthmatth 4 years ago
Some engineer got fired for that one.
Postie1 4 years ago
By the looks of it He probly got his 3rd grade kid to just glue it together
HaloLvl43Legit 4 years ago
LOL !!!!
Postie1 4 years ago
Missle Geeks stop wearing flight suits and spings
HueyFE 4 years ago
What is the second launch?
MegaUltraGalactic79 4 years ago
Could use some of these clips on a VIAGRA ad...?
njmike38 4 years ago
ROFLMAO
benavesdownunder 4 years ago
LOL
HaloLvl43Legit 4 years ago
It's a good (?) thing the Soviets never got these tapes, or they would have probably laughed themselves to death.
JWall416 4 years ago
what country?
einstein0324 5 years ago
USA, sad, but funny.
Postie1 4 years ago
"Our rockets always explode" was the phrase back in 1960. It was a given that the Soviet Union was way ahead. The "Missle Gap" was a household name. Think we live in scary times now?
WallacePSmith 5 years ago
LOL the best one was where the top fell off of it sideways
bezerker4828 5 years ago
Very well done. Nice compilation. :)
I give it 5.
BigBrotherMateyka 5 years ago
OMG, I can't believe that one rocket just like cracked and fell over.
Anticyclonic 5 years ago
Today's liquid-based rockets are made with such thin margins that they have to be pressurized to hold up their own weight. Just like you can stand on a closed Coke can, but you can crush an open one.
miketwo345 5 years ago
That rocket that fell over was a static test article of the Atlas-Agena vehicle. Atlas vehicles were extremely thin-skinned, and had to be pressurized in order to maintain its shape. That vehicle was full of sand, thankfully, and not live propellant!
cag1970 5 years ago
that explains it. I was wondering why it didn't blow up!
smoothvirus 5 years ago
The last one seems to be an ICBM... it wouldn't be nice if this happened with one with the nuclear warheads installed... of course if armed ICBMs had to be launched, the whole situation would be beyond "not nice"...
Ribozyme 5 years ago
Could be wrong but I think the warheads are designed not to go off in that situation, not that I'd want to be the one to test it :D
Dopplershift 5 years ago
Yep, that last one is a Minuteman ICBM. Looked like it might have been heading from Vandenburg down the Pacific Range to Kwajalein.
cag1970 5 years ago
post the lots more, that was tight.
lordoftheharvest 5 years ago