Well to be honest, For something which looks as its done in school theyre not really going to set the time asside to come up with their own 12 tone are they, Theyre just going to do something, That to them resembles serialism. Well thats my guess anyway :) Just a representation
@Iheartboosh it took me one year this time: to tell you that you can listen to whatever, just be aware that what to you may sound spontaneous (for example linkin park) is the exact opposite; there is no worst lie in music than what sounds spontaneous, expressive. serialism tried to deal with this, maybe failing, but at least being honest!
I didn't say Linkin Park was spontaneous, of course it isn't, but it does sound a lot better than serialism.
It really sounds like you love the idea of serialism, but don't like the music either. It is an interesting idea but sounds shit to most sane people in the world.
@Iheartboosh i love techno hardcore! :-)) maybe that's the reason why i don't care about what most of the people like. because they don't love, they just like.
With all respect, I think you don't have any idea of what "serialism" means! Saying "we're doing serialism because we're playing something awful and without sense" is a kind of joke (not very original or funny) that contributes keeping this music obscure for most of the people.
"serialism" is sticking to the rules... which makes it sound shit. It's so hard to make serialism sound good, to be honest i can't think of any nice pieces. And it looks like a school thing so they are hardly going to make the best music in the world.
nice try anyway guys :P this lot were better than the ones before.
No. What keeps it obscure is that it's an entirely new language that was INVENTED (as opposed to developed) and a false one at that because people's ears just don't "hear" music in that way. Boulez is probably the only guy on earth who can actually hear the entire row, and I'm not sure I believe him anyway. But most importantly, it's too scientific. It focuses on a certain number of aspects of music and ignores the rest, many of which are what most listeners are really listening to.
i don't have much trust in the average listener! switch on your tv and you'll know why. the biggest error of the serialism was to shut away the link classical music had with popular music, but in their view they had no choice.
again, beware of what you call natural: nothing in music is natural, as it is made by man!
Sorry guys but this is hardly serialism
nlo13 2 years ago
This is hardly serialism. I don't even think it can count as being twelve-tone. Isn't that a V-I cadence at 0:22?!
MaestroTJS 2 years ago
Well to be honest, For something which looks as its done in school theyre not really going to set the time asside to come up with their own 12 tone are they, Theyre just going to do something, That to them resembles serialism. Well thats my guess anyway :) Just a representation
sammarshalluk 2 years ago
eurch! I hate serialism in general
and d0o0o0b you took like 4 months to reply!
Iheartboosh 2 years ago
@Iheartboosh it took me one year this time: to tell you that you can listen to whatever, just be aware that what to you may sound spontaneous (for example linkin park) is the exact opposite; there is no worst lie in music than what sounds spontaneous, expressive. serialism tried to deal with this, maybe failing, but at least being honest!
d0o0o0b 1 year ago
@d0o0o0b
I didn't say Linkin Park was spontaneous, of course it isn't, but it does sound a lot better than serialism.
It really sounds like you love the idea of serialism, but don't like the music either. It is an interesting idea but sounds shit to most sane people in the world.
Iheartboosh 1 year ago
@Iheartboosh i love techno hardcore! :-)) maybe that's the reason why i don't care about what most of the people like. because they don't love, they just like.
inthedancehole 1 year ago
With all respect, I think you don't have any idea of what "serialism" means! Saying "we're doing serialism because we're playing something awful and without sense" is a kind of joke (not very original or funny) that contributes keeping this music obscure for most of the people.
d0o0o0b 3 years ago
"serialism" is sticking to the rules... which makes it sound shit. It's so hard to make serialism sound good, to be honest i can't think of any nice pieces. And it looks like a school thing so they are hardly going to make the best music in the world.
nice try anyway guys :P this lot were better than the ones before.
Iheartboosh 3 years ago
yeah, fuck da rules.
d0o0o0b 2 years ago
No. What keeps it obscure is that it's an entirely new language that was INVENTED (as opposed to developed) and a false one at that because people's ears just don't "hear" music in that way. Boulez is probably the only guy on earth who can actually hear the entire row, and I'm not sure I believe him anyway. But most importantly, it's too scientific. It focuses on a certain number of aspects of music and ignores the rest, many of which are what most listeners are really listening to.
MaestroTJS 2 years ago
i don't have much trust in the average listener! switch on your tv and you'll know why. the biggest error of the serialism was to shut away the link classical music had with popular music, but in their view they had no choice.
again, beware of what you call natural: nothing in music is natural, as it is made by man!
d0o0o0b 1 year ago