love your video your magnificent... keep making more i suscribed. im barely starting out with this kind of technology and gathering information and magnets to build my own... are you a tesla fan?
@BadRick951 Tesla is the great master of electromagnetic invention. He is an icon I respect. Personally i am interested in the mechanical proof of gravity, magntism and inertyial oscillation like of Finsrud.
Looks like many among us feel the strong impulse to make an ass of themselves by posting video's and claiming that the device shown "will" produce free energy, before they actually have achieved it. And then finding out it doesn't work... : D
I can't see it as free energy yet; but an energy expansion project, where you take a micro force and increase it with a multiplier affect related to the magnetic relationship defined by the shape. ... looking at it it makes great sense... and we could ramp it up to a certain zenith I imagine based on size/shape and sensor driven mechantic stimulus. But as far as your hand demonstration your rhythm is terrible! (This is where sensors and computer driven stimulus is needed...)... I imagine...
@kurisu925 can you explain to me why you think that after an overunity machine passed 100% that it would burn out? I don't really see a reason for it to blow up or whatever you are suggesting.
i beleive in self urnning machines and that there are many of them in the world that cannot be replicated and are one offs and are only able to power them selves n nothin more overunity is getting smoething 4 nothing whitch i feel is impossible even if it was i think the machine would be infinately big with only .000000000000001% of output than input its just my idea powerin stuff with energy that already xists in the universe but nfin more
You fail to see that it is taking more energy for you to poke at the part in your hand than the amount of energy that is transfered into the spinning of the wheel below. It can not be overunity if it needs more energy in than what it can put out. Also I dont think calling overunity "free energy" is an accurate statement any way. We allready have "free" energy in the sense that we do not have to pay for it thanks to solar panels and a few others.
@kurisu Since we do not understand how to convert space energy into kinetic energy it is useless to tell each other what we do wrong. What is the right way? Refrain? Give up? Run away from this challenge? is that your suggestion? Overunity means selfgeneration of energy . The universe moves on its own driving force of time. Now we want the experimental copy of this drive. This is about the fourth generation free energy technologies. I know about the first three generations. See IEA and my videos
@anandaadhar Its cute that you pretend to know so much but here is the truth. The universe does not have an endless power supply running it. Since it's creation it has neither gained nor lost energy. But it's energy spreads thin as it expands ever further into the endless void. Eventually it will be spread so thin that it will die.
@kurisu925 That is all your theory. There are more theories. Others say that there is constant creation and destruction going on, a constant conversion of dark energy into manifest energy. So lets not be presumptuous and say we know it all. All we know is a lot of theories.
This is not to defend these theories and concept nor to discredit it. But to all who feel that the need to "Attack" all these people with their concepts...
"There are no success that never had any failures," so please do not try to destroy others hard works into learning. Just ignore it if you don't care. Or share your ideas why you believe your ideas are better.
@anandaadhar Trial and error is not the answer to every thing you know. Even thomas edison who tried more metals to use as the filament in a light bulb before finally getting it to work than I would care to count... He allready knew it was possible because he knew the science behind it. Magnet motors just have a bunch of under educated weekend warriors behind them.
@kurisu925 I woudn't call Tesla and Heisenberg under "educated weekend warriors". Heisenberg thought magnet motors are possible. I think you project your own inability to cope with this. There is a lot of science theory about this but inconclusive proof. We know time runs everything so why not a time-sensitive mechanical setup? Trial and error is not a choice but a predicament. We can't do better until we have experimental proof of this new law called the conservation of movement or time law
@anandaadhar Tesla never beleived in overunity. He beleived he could use the atmosphere like a battery. One which would be constantly kept charged by the same processes that generate thunderstoms. You wanna know what would really happen if an overunity generator was created? The moment it reached over 100% efficency it would overload and burn out. And thats if it was not impossible to do in the first place.
@kurisu Each has his own words for it. Overunity, radiant energy, Zero-point energy etc. What's in a name? Your saying about what happens if we do catch time energy, that we immediately would lose control is nonsense. The first thing one will do is limit the flow, control the flow. What else would be the purpose of the machine? It is not something like a flat tire with all energy flooding out suddenly. It is more a valve in which you control the access. See e.g. Thomas Henry Moray (at my site)
@anandaadhar acutally teslas was a radiant energy device that harnessed the cosmic rays that all large suns throw off at unbelieveably high voltage, these particles are going so fast that they pass through everything, he made a device that would harness these particles to make energy, i show a very basic device gathering energy to show that it does work. tell me when you get a device that keeps going, i love magnet motors!
Read the following with ventilator breath and satanic tones of Darth Vader: "Do not traduce the name of Bearden or I will have your spinal discs for shower curtain rings."
Another 'Go back to school...' 'Go read a physics textbook' or 'I hope you aren't taking a physics course...' type comment.
Why don't you lot just piss off, and stop bitching about people who are trying to make a difference?
What we are taught in school/University is conventional physics, what these people are doing is researching UN- conventional physics. Going to school, buying a textbook etc etc etc (ad nauseum) will only go towards facilitating the research, not the other way around.
Just read a couple of your posts further up...slightly embarrassing, but hey ho...What have you got against Tom BTW? Hasn't he just had a patent granted for his gizmo the 'MEG'? Patents are not usually given out willy nilly are they? Perhaps they are..
You seem certain he's not legit, can you offer any proof or evidence of this?
I genuinely interested, and this isn't me saying 'put up or shut up' or whatever.
I've never seen a person more full of nonsense and spouting goobledygook than Tom Beardon. If you want a real explanation of all this free energy stuff, you need to look at someone skilled in this field, like, for instance, Harold Aspden, a PhD electrical engineer whose PhD thesis was in anomalus heating effects caused by 'free energy' in transformer iron. John Bedini has discovered an effect, but he really doesnt understand what causes it either. I think you and others need to do more research
I know very well Aspden, He is an old boy with a nice website and theoretical proposals, He has a few patens and was a patent attorney himself. He was associated with the autralian Adams switched reluctance motor development. There are claims of overunity in that department but replications as yet proved to fail in that. But Bearden and Bedini walk another path. I don't call that path lesser. They were succesfully replicated by some, so far the claims go. Don't just suppose I'm ignorant, guesser
If that's all you got from looking at his website, you must have spent less that an hour looking at it. There's a WHOLE lot more there than what you mention, AND an experiment you can replicate which proves the existence of free energy. Like I said.......but you can stumble around if you want :D
It wouldn't even keep turning with all the help you were giving it. You turned the turntable by hand and then you flip the top thing by hand, and still it doesn't turn in any synchronous way. It's been almost a year and a half since you posted this video. I bet you still have the same problems.
See my later videos. With a bigger disc and a bigger stator, like a disc magnet, spin is easier to acquire. But always the input of a moving stator is required. The question is whether we can create a vibration with a feedbackloop to the disc that is selfsustaining with the energy of space. As u yet no success , just theories that fail to prove right. Still tere are non-replicable 'successes'. At least this 'overunity' effect is replicable. In fact is is not overunity until it can feed itself.
We have theories on how we could harness this reaction force of magnets. As yet the breakthrough has not been achieved. But many are trying, and some report success. But replication as yet has not been successful
By converting space energy (vacuum energy) into kinetic energy of course, what else? That is what we test with this experiment. And yes it is not concluded. What are you yourself, a sceptic or an idealist? What do you yourself practically? Just words I don't care about really. The action hero is one, the rest is bystander.
Skeptic or idealist? You somehow conclude they are mutually exclusive? Not on your Nelly.
Idealism to me is living in a faithless society where all the supposed merits of religion, such as moral values, charity etc are accepted as normal human behavior without some make believe God mindset.
I agree a good idealist is a sceptic against prefixed standard notions that were found ineffective in making a better world. Thus he is pushing he envelope of what is considered possible. That is what I do. I investigate the possibility to set magnetism against other natural forces in such a way that the natural dynamics of time between those force manifest themselves. One has to think outside the box for that and seek other explanations and theories than the conventional ones.
You dont know what ye do my friend, ask me and I will tell you if ye find free energy you are a dead man. Amagine how happy the oil monsters gonna be if ye let them know theyre out of bussiness. There is free energy, you have the right idea in magnets, but ye play with fire, real fire.
Magnets have fascinated perpetual motion desingers because they are bit mystical and harder to comprehend than sticks or string. In my point of view you might as well try to make it work with sticks and string.
You can try to jump up and down million times and try to hope that at some jump gravity just dissapears and proves that physics theory and sceptics have been wrong. You can jump your whole life and wish for that but intelligent ones figure out more clever things to put their mind on to.
You take sides in a paradigmatic conflict between the rational and practical appoaches of science. I chosethe practical side. Moving magnets create electricity, do that with string and sticks! We benefit from them. They polarize the chaos of space energy around them. All we have to do is to uitilize this polarity in a rotating setup. That is how motors work. It is just the quantum mechanics that we are nerding with. So that's what we work on. idealists lead, sceptics complain and criticize.
By converting space energy, That is the quantum mechanical point ii a magnet motor, it is a converter of energy. Old physics supposes thevacuum is empty new physics suppose it is an energy phenomenon. Space is a medium with material qualities, as such there is an ether. This is what Einstein said in 1920 confessing he had been too radical in his former declaration that the concept of the ether was unnecessary because is was difficult to measure physically. Naturally, for ether is protomaterial!
I agree with zzytrewq 100%. Why this propel head doesnt create simple mechanism between the "pusher" part and the spinning disc is because he doesnt get it working without putting energy to the system from his body.
I need you to to run a simple experiment. Make a flywheel put a magnet on it, and spin it freely watch how many times it turns. Then affix a stationary magnet alongside of this flywheel. Attempt to get the wheel to spin the same number of times you did in the first run. Then tell me there is no "Mechanical interaction between magnets" - it will require more energy to spin the wheel the same number of times than it did without the stationary magnet. Because there was a mechanical interaction.
Indeed, that is exactly the crucial point. In version 5.0 (see my page) I demonstarte a spindown near to a naked run. As soon as the interaction delivers a better spindown than a maked setup we have more or less the proof of magnetic overunity. As yet I jhave not succeded in this. There are effects like of Hamel, but they do not exceed the input. We haven't found the trick as yet, nor me, nor many others, except for Searl and Finsrud, to keep a chronic imbalance that defeats the conservation law
Don't you get it? You never WILL "succeed in this" because it is impossible. You are wasting your time. As were all the other millions of people who have been trying to do this or similar things for the last several thousand years. The laws of conservation of energy are carved in stone and you CANNOT beat them. It really IS that simple.
What you say is an opinion, not fact, Google for Finsrud, he has a working gravito-magnetic selfrruner. He smartly controls the natural unrest of a chaos pendulum with three other pendulums relative to a steel ball on a dynamic track attached to the central chaos pendulum. He defeats your so-called laws. There is appratently also a law of conservation of field energy. So it thus works when one stresses the fields with gravity and there you are. Nature conserves the field. What do you say now?
There's your first mistake. What I say is a fact. What you say is simply naive bullshit spouted by a "believer". Science is science. Religion is what you spout.
"he has a working gravito-magnetic selfrruner"
No he doesn't. He produces pieces of art not science.
The laws of physics are not negotiable. Especially by a scam artist or pseudoscientist on youtube.
You don't check the facts I point out. You ignore that the Finsrud machine works without any input. You simply say bullshit and call that science, No that is scepticism. Is that science? Now that is naive belief! True science admits: we do not know it all and have to keep an open mind and prove everything by experiment. Finsrud delivers proof you don't want to know. The way you are you trust another. Now that is psycholgy, not physics.
I'm afraid you're wrong. His machine has not been inspected or tested by a SINGLE scientist. It is hidden from inspection. NOBODY is allowed to inspect it. And did you also forget that they "have to keep stopping it to clean it" and that only Finsrud's own team are allowed to clean it? It is a nice piece of art.
The free energy researcher Don Asitis of theverylastpageon theinternet (now at internetarchive) has visited him and written an extensive report, after talking to Finsrud and discussing and checking his machine. From that report I have my confidence in the genuine nature of the contraption.But you are right, there is only certainty if I can manage to replicate. One has to believe in a possible true effect, study the logics and then find a way with it.That is what I try. Just conjecture or refute.
The page is still in the internet archive, I downloaded it before the site disappeared. It was certainly not a joke website. Check my free energy pages a my site theorderoftime ,org where I processed much of his information. Link upper right infobox. There is also another YouTube movie on him of someobe analyzing a norwegian newspaperarticle on him. watch?v=rBQSl3GexPM You can also check Finsruds site where he shows many drawings of his design of the machine.Google it or follow from my website.
Would you allow people to touch your work when that must not be disturbed to keep functioning? It is a perpetuum motion device you understand. It cannot work when every one is allowed to touch it. Finsrud is an anti-materialist artist. He wants nothing with formal science with all its endless speculations, doubts and scepticism. Erwing Schrödinger said: I believe a magnet motor is possible, only we science idiots can't do it. Only an outsider can. So. And he won the Nobel prize. You doubt them?
You are clearly not an artist. Ever been in a museum? By the way why do you care so much about matters you don't believe in? Preaching science you may leave to Erwin Schrodinger and other renown physcists. At least they dare to doubt their own paradigm. Why do yuo think physics is such a closed front? They don't agree at all. Even Einstein said in 1920 In Leyden the Netherlands (my country) that he had been too radical in denying the ether. So who are you at all?
In way yes, i face the problem, you don't. Guess who has the biggest chance of achieving? And you say thus that non-achieving is to your advantage? What kind of philosophy is that? Even the greatest yogi wnat to achieve the association of his favorite godhead and the enlightenment of his emancipatiowith it. So wha actaully is your confession, what is your science? Nuts and bolts only? That won't save the world you know!
You see that's another problem you have. You think because you believe in something that is impossible you have a better chance of achieving it. That is very strange logic.
Just because you "believe" doesn't make the impossible suddenly possible.
I know it is impossible, you don't. Neither of us can achieve it. But I won't have wasted my time trying. You will.
No i don't indeed, "I only know I don't know", said Socrates, "but You statesman, you just pretend to know". For this he was poisoned. So you agree with this execution of the founder of our western philosophy..., I am not an heretic in his school. What are you, stressing what is known and denying what is unknown? How to explore and discover then? How to progress? Yes, it is a act of belief. How to attain without it? I really don't get why you are so committed to something you don't care about...
Listen, now we are repeating ourselves, Finsrud is has the working one. You don't care about it. Fine. So leave it. Thus you should now look another way. Whatdo you want now? Want to get the better of me? Do you really think you can convince of your sceptcism? Come on!
I don't want anything. But I do hate to see people wasting their lives on something that is impossible. Finsrud made a piece of art. He's laughing at everyone. It's clockwork.
Imagination and the belief in what everyone thought was impossible is the story of human development. Think of all the technology we have today which at some point in history was considered to be impossible. Somehow, imagination always prevails. we should fund this kind of research. At the very least we may find other applications for similar technologies.
"Think of all the technology we have today which at some point in history was considered to be impossible"
This is where your confusion lies. I can't think of anything we have today that was ever considered "impossible". Difficult yes, beyond human ability or knowledge yes. But there were no laws of physics (as undersood then) making them "impossible".
What you consider to be the Laws of physics, I consider to be no more than our most recent attempt at understanding the universe, the best models we have come up with so far. If you are convinced of your limitations, you are not likely move past them. Read some quantum physics, maybe it will open your horizons a bit.
Cite me a reference where the scientific community said lfight was against the known laws of physics. You can't because it was never said. You've read too many fairy tales.
200 years ago there were plenty of people who would have argued that cars, planes, cellphones, cloning, space travel and many other common technologies of our day were impossible. My position is that our only limitation is our imagination and i think history backs me up on this. I am not impressed by those who dogmatically claim that what they can't imagine personally is impossible for someone who has a better imagination than they do.
you seem to be very convinced that the laws of physics are the deepest understanding that we will ever have. No point in discussing much further. I don't have ready access to what people believed were immutable laws throughout history but i know that our understanding of nature continues to grow and i am equally as confident that as we further understand and define laws of quantum physics, we will do things that physics says cant be done. Time will tell, eh? good luck to you.
I remember an article where many people doubted space travel because the rocket engine "wouldn't have anything to push against" as they didn't understand how rockets are actually propelled.
Even found a reference to it". Goggle "the cannonball approach to space travel"
I'm not doing this to claim your bet but just to let you know about a bit of history of thinking with regards to technology.
There are many more examples of sceptical approaches against scientific things we consider normal these days like flying with crafts heavier than air. There is always resistance from the ego of the sitting powers. But progress, cultural evoluton is inevitable. Our resistance of ego against the uncertainties at border lines of scientific ego may be compared to the dogmatism of the Catholic Church against reform. Reform is the nature of progress, blocking it leads to mental disease and warfare.
Previous skepticism was not supported by scientific evidence. Nowadays we have a greater understanding of scientific principles.
Comparing a perceived lack of support to non workable concepts with the unscientific dogma of the Catholic church, a purely faith based organization is nonsense.
This is not about reform, which is a social/political viewpoint, this is about pure science.
You need to go back to basics and stop making this some imaginary war between vision and reality.
What you say, sketicism must be supported by scientific evidence. Also refutation is an experimental result, not just a paradigmatic judgement. We understand quantummechanics to be the basis for magnets motors. Heisenberg considered it possible. See my Finsrud analysis of his perpetual motion. Scientific reform is inevitable with successful experiments and cannot be considered apart from societal and social reform either. Ships with the same cultural evolution that cannot be stopped by anyone.
Eastern Mysticism has nothing to do with nuts and bolts solutions. Things that operate in the physical universe only do so in the physical universe. And are subject to the natural laws of that universe.
Vishnu stands for the ether. There are three Vishnu's , thus there are three ethers of which the interaction, by Einstein, we have the universe as a condensation of that primordial energy. Einsten calls it spacetime. The veda;s speak of pradhana. it is the same thing. We get energy from it spiritually, and why wouldn't that be mechanically proven?Actually Mylow has delivered the proof recently. See watch?v=sPDXsrrs398 Spirituality bridges the gap between matter and protomatter or space energy.
I am a self-employed electronics engineer. If I had to include all of that psycho-babble in my work, I would be out of business. I prefer results over wishful thinking. By the way, the reason your wheel rotates at all is because of the kinetic energy added by your hand movements. THERE IS NO ENERGY IN MAGNETS, just magnetic force.
You have a big mouth, but you didn't follow the link I gave you. There you see energy from magnets keeping a rotor spinning. Also look for Finsrud. watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q Yes it breaks the equivalence principle (google it) and yes, Einstein is down the drain then. Sorry for that. But that is how science is. Facts rule, mind it. And practical minded people like you should learn to act to it. As for the "babble": First think then act, first pray, then work. Isn't that the common sense about it all?
There are two types of makebelief. One is the belief in a theory without suficient proof for definitive conjecture or refutation, The other suggests a success but it is not replicable. The first type is the correct one and constitutes the lead of all scientific experimentation. Indeed the final operative design is in a time perspective, but it is not procrastination. Procrastination implies knowledge of the definyive setup. About that the first option is never sure, the second is, but cheats.
There are extensive discussions about Finsrud at the overunity and steorn forums and at Peswiki they also have a page about his machine. You are really the only one seriously interested in free energy devices who is so darn sceptical about him. He, together with Searl, Bedini and Bearden is one of the few real pillars of practical proof that keep going thousands of researchers (and practicle minded idealist believers of course).
anandaadhar .. I checked your website and your credability (AND street cred AND karma) dropped to 0.. There's a book called "Továrna na Absolutno" by Karel Čapek that has generators running on "nothing". That was fun to read, it's called fiction, just like your opinions mate.. =/
I don't know that book, never heard of it. That fiction is yours. I go for facts not fiction, and if you mean to say that science is in agreement about facts you are wrong. They move in conflicting paradigms. Quantum mechanics e.g. is dealing with effects the Newtonians -people like you I presume -can't explain, And why should I care about you believing or not? Believe or not believe is your problem. I just do what I can to help us out of the illusion of control that destroys the world.
One thing: when writing on YouTube I would recommend using understandable English: paradigm is a word nobody uses, say "pattern" instead, or "model". Whatever you do with magnets, don't you see that energy MUST come from somewhere .. you can get near-perpetual motion machines that CONSERVE the energy they have, not generate it. It's not a case of believing, your work is not based on scientific principles and scientific approach (theory -> experiment -> proof). This talk here is just philosophy..
Yes it is philosphy until the theory is proven, sure. So I say we transform space energy into usable one, You say from your paradigm it does not exist. I insist you use a dictionary to fight your ignorance and not repress half that book. And thats why we have this experiment: to deliver experimental proof, to confirm with that thefindings a few examples that seemed hopeful and promising. Science is there of conjecture and refutation (look it up) We need an incentive, and then wonder: is it true?
Paradigm is perfectly allright to use. Paradigm: technical a typical example or pattern of something; also in: the discovery of universal gravitation became the paradigm of successful science. And 8DX, don't you believe in yourself??
i was going to make a post about these movies, but i see someone had already said the EXACT thing i wanted to say so ill just repost his
"it works. the people arguing you are trying to discredit you. have the strength to overcome. these are people that will try anything to stop you from making this even a thought in someones head, let alone an element in their everyday lives." by samsblakdog
Thanks for your support. I keep researching, experimenting and pushing the limit for the sake of a definite mechanical proof of natural OU, or the selfrunning status. The science encounter with the reality of the ether 'of the third kind'.....
electrical and electromagnetic proof is OK. But you could not overcome second law of thermodynamics. Let me explain, the pulse you intend to give the system should be more than the rotational inertia of the magnet. So sorry buddy you have not achieved anything special. It is not producing energy, but converting your muscular energy into rotation of the wheel. Although a OK concept... IT WON'T WORK. Good luck with your work, don't quit your day job. Nice work on video making..
Just to clarify, I did watch all your videos. You can't make it self running because of the inherent frictional losses. Even with a frictionless drive like couette flow bearing you will not be able to produce energy...
Hujovina means the inanimate in Russian. If you mean to say that dead things will never come to life, just look at all the universe spinning around. All of matter is in flux, isn't it? Panta Rhei said Heracleitos. Why would our machine not pick up anything of that movement? Souds simple not?
it works. the people arguing you are trying to discredit you. have the strength to overcome. these are people that will try anything to stop you from making this even a thought in someones head, let alone an element in their everyday lives.
The Hamel effect of this cakra works indeed, but to prove it as overunity in the form of a selfrunner is something different. The feedback principle proves not to work as I wished (see my vid called trials and conclusion) But i keep trying with Hamel despite of initial faillures. Trial and error is the way of science. Thanks for the support.
If that means in English that you are complaining that I move the thing with my hand, please read previous discussions about this. The point is to take the hand ut of the equation , if that works has the experiment into OU succeeded. E We keep trying.
The existence of Gravitons has not been proven yet. It is only theorized to exist as one possible explaination of gravity. As a transfer particle like gluons are for the strong force. The existence of vacuum energy or zero-point energy is also not proven. You need to establish this BEFORE you can claim anything... or else you break the conservation of energy law!!!
Conservation of energy law is only true for closed systems, we are talking about open systems. Zero-point energy is a normal concept in science, see wikipedia. See also Tom Valone on this and the fysicist Thomas Bearden on vacuum energy. Theory of gravitons is applicable to the experimental effects observed in this research. Theory is needed. Proof of many overunity effects is there. See e.g. cold fusion. That is how it is. Study before you say things like this.
That is the way proven already by Bearden and Bedini. Now we try this feedback and control purely mechanical. That proof is needed for the paradigm to turn over. We are now in phase three:
Phase 1: the cakra-pulse plate with fixed stator
Phase 2: the feedback loop with a second stator
Phase 3: the stabilization and reinforcement of the pulse in the loop.
With these three completed it should self run. If not then there are also three options:
Right you are! We are working for a device for the mechanical proof of magnetic overunity. Otherwise all talk is useless. (electronic and electromagnetic is proven already)
i just dont think people will consider that the "ultimate technology", a machine that creates energy and doesnt only consume it. I rly need to see a self driven rapid acceleration.
As yet you are referred to the aliens in their flying saucers. They accomplish that, so it is possible. We try to copy that, but it's not that easey. Step by step, principle by principle we progress. That is the only way. We first need a magnetic selfrunner that is easily replicable, Then education has a thing to explain and demonstrate, Then we'll scale up.
yes but i mean no human assistance, im sure if u can build this u can build a autotrigger working off the free mechanical energy. and the device makes itself accelerate consistently until like 20 secs later it about to break.
We'll do our best and keep you posted (if you do the same) except for that last oart of accellerating into a break. We actually aim at a slow spinner called A Device for the Proof of Magnetic Overunity that keeps running stable without accellerating or slowing. Autostaring is an ideal.
fancy talk, but i think its all talk. show me a video of the machine working on its own and getting faster. Ignorance may be bliss, but physical results talk. Until then, I think i can still say im skeptical.
Anyone with a good I.Q. can see that this device does indeed work. He has documented this and shared it with us kindly. His intention is not to please random strangers on youtube, who say "prove it to me, and show me a better example". He's showing us this so those of us who have eyes to see can follow along. Besides that, Myth Busters already proved free energy. It's no longer debatable.
so there is hidden free energy, but simple gravity is doesnt allow it to occur. If u can unpolarise magnetism, u may gain energy by using unpolarised magnet to gain altitude, then collect the energy from the freefall.
Without the magnetic dipole you will not be able to let those gravitons, those gravity particles, do work for you. It is because of the polarity that the magnet does work. Gravity is not the hindrance, our ignorance is the greatest hindrance.
just cuz something has 99.99% effiency, doesnt mean its drawing in free energy, hell even 100% effiency doesnt support it. If u have a pendulum in a vacuum and its rotating joint is magnetically suspended, it will maintain the same speed and max height forever. Gravity does in a way support free energy because objects never in earths gravity may gain energy from acceleration, disproving lifting a mass into orbit is just "storing energy potential" because the energy from fall=energy to lift.
Listen COP>1 has been proven already.Sprain has patented recently a setup with a magnetic circle with a gate. You can see that in the list to the right: Maget Motor free energy. He uses an electromagnet that uses 3 voolts whle the device delivers 6.1 volts. Now that os more than 100% overunity. We need to d it mechanically, Okay?
the point is that u cannot create a gravitational field strong enuff to do jack on a reasonable level, gravity is very weak because it is spread out over many universes that occupy the same spacetime, magnetism is believe to be a focused and polarised use of the missing gravity. In relative of strength of gravity to say strong force, even a small amount of matter would have considerable gravity fields. So if we found a way to depolarise magnetism, we could use a type of free energy to levitate.
Others could (see my favorites), so why can't we with this design? Rotation does the trick of drawing in the energy. Zsabo calls it energy by motion. We have an easy pulse here. So... Gravity may be relatively weak, but from the stuff of the gravitons is everything else created, so that useless it isn't either.
Others could (see my favorites) So why wouldn't we with this design? Gravity might be weak relatively, but gravitons is the stuff that all matter originated from. Depolarization of magnets gives a monopole. The universe is such a monopole driving the energy of its expansion for us to use. So let's try it...qualms should not hinder but lead ahead.
Space is an extension, just like any other body with substance. You cannot separate space from matter, even Einstein said this. Space without physical properties is unthinkable.
As I was watching I detected a pendulum movement, so my suggestion is to try putting a pendulum arm on one side of the exciter axle, see if anything changes.
Still not a bad idea, Finrud, an artist, (see my favorites) made a machine that runs for days on one install. His 'perpetuum mobile' delivers that way 99.99.% COP. He uses a combination of pendulums and magnetism.
Ever heard of the gravitational lenses formed by galaxies that Einstein predicted woud bend the trajectory of light in outer space? It is a proven fact that the universe is ruled by gravitational fields. Descartes said already; empty space does not exist. And he proved to be right.
No not the air, it is the energy of space. Space consists of gravity fields (spacetime distortions). These fields are made up of gravitons: particles with a double spin which are polarized by the magnets. These polarized particles do work. To catch that work is the essence of the overunity quest.
Correct, this has been accomplished by Searl, who lost several of his SEG-machines who simply took off through his roof into space by their increasing anti-gravity, because that is the fate of having such a machine without a break.
if over unity was achieved it may seem perpetual but instead u would have made a machine that directly absorbs ambient thermal energy and therefore is a endothermic mechanical structure. If u do the math right that as the temp goes down, the flux trapping becomes less efficient.
The latter I wouldn'd say. There is indeed a cooling effect with overunity graviton converters (like with the magnetic oscillation system of Sweet) But that supply of energy is unlimited, there is no diminution or loss of vacuum energy. That is the beauty of the thing!
It might be better if you were to have some tripod clamps to hold the actuator rather than you using your hands. From then on just use small adjustments of the tripod clamps.
See my later video's, e are in phase three already, fter having fixed the staor and having realized the feedback loop. Now we have to control the OU in the loop. (see my IPMM MAN device video)
What i love is learning what i was never taught in school. I was told absolute values, that the consept of perpetual motion should never be investigated, as an Absolute.
love your video your magnificent... keep making more i suscribed. im barely starting out with this kind of technology and gathering information and magnets to build my own... are you a tesla fan?
BadRick951 1 year ago
@BadRick951 Tesla is the great master of electromagnetic invention. He is an icon I respect. Personally i am interested in the mechanical proof of gravity, magntism and inertyial oscillation like of Finsrud.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
Fixed setup would do better for the pulse feedback. But principle is very clear explained
JDoubleOP 1 year ago
@srdickens looks like a Bedini system in the mist! keep going
anandaadhar 1 year ago
looks like duct tape and legos and popsicle sticks
monkeys1954 1 year ago
@monkeys1954 simple in the beginning...
anandaadhar 1 year ago
Looks like many among us feel the strong impulse to make an ass of themselves by posting video's and claiming that the device shown "will" produce free energy, before they actually have achieved it. And then finding out it doesn't work... : D
Lode52 1 year ago
@Lode52 yeah we all start like believers, until we are real scientists.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
I can't see it as free energy yet; but an energy expansion project, where you take a micro force and increase it with a multiplier affect related to the magnetic relationship defined by the shape. ... looking at it it makes great sense... and we could ramp it up to a certain zenith I imagine based on size/shape and sensor driven mechantic stimulus. But as far as your hand demonstration your rhythm is terrible! (This is where sensors and computer driven stimulus is needed...)... I imagine...
adistantbox 1 year ago
ni babi buat apa ni
antakyusilo 1 year ago
@antakyusilo beg your pardon?
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@kurisu925 can you explain to me why you think that after an overunity machine passed 100% that it would burn out? I don't really see a reason for it to blow up or whatever you are suggesting.
FearlesSnowman 1 year ago
хуета
00Phantomus012 1 year ago
@00Phantomus012 English please...
anandaadhar 1 year ago
i beleive in self urnning machines and that there are many of them in the world that cannot be replicated and are one offs and are only able to power them selves n nothin more overunity is getting smoething 4 nothing whitch i feel is impossible even if it was i think the machine would be infinately big with only .000000000000001% of output than input its just my idea powerin stuff with energy that already xists in the universe but nfin more
count3rculture 1 year ago
You fail to see that it is taking more energy for you to poke at the part in your hand than the amount of energy that is transfered into the spinning of the wheel below. It can not be overunity if it needs more energy in than what it can put out. Also I dont think calling overunity "free energy" is an accurate statement any way. We allready have "free" energy in the sense that we do not have to pay for it thanks to solar panels and a few others.
kurisu925 1 year ago
@kurisu Since we do not understand how to convert space energy into kinetic energy it is useless to tell each other what we do wrong. What is the right way? Refrain? Give up? Run away from this challenge? is that your suggestion? Overunity means selfgeneration of energy . The universe moves on its own driving force of time. Now we want the experimental copy of this drive. This is about the fourth generation free energy technologies. I know about the first three generations. See IEA and my videos
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar Its cute that you pretend to know so much but here is the truth. The universe does not have an endless power supply running it. Since it's creation it has neither gained nor lost energy. But it's energy spreads thin as it expands ever further into the endless void. Eventually it will be spread so thin that it will die.
kurisu925 1 year ago
@kurisu925 That is all your theory. There are more theories. Others say that there is constant creation and destruction going on, a constant conversion of dark energy into manifest energy. So lets not be presumptuous and say we know it all. All we know is a lot of theories.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
This is not to defend these theories and concept nor to discredit it. But to all who feel that the need to "Attack" all these people with their concepts...
"There are no success that never had any failures," so please do not try to destroy others hard works into learning. Just ignore it if you don't care. Or share your ideas why you believe your ideas are better.
Peacekeeper2403 1 year ago
Thanks, I agree, a positive attitude is needed to advance in this, however clumsy it might seem, by trial and error we find the truth, God willing.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar Trial and error is not the answer to every thing you know. Even thomas edison who tried more metals to use as the filament in a light bulb before finally getting it to work than I would care to count... He allready knew it was possible because he knew the science behind it. Magnet motors just have a bunch of under educated weekend warriors behind them.
kurisu925 1 year ago
@kurisu925 I woudn't call Tesla and Heisenberg under "educated weekend warriors". Heisenberg thought magnet motors are possible. I think you project your own inability to cope with this. There is a lot of science theory about this but inconclusive proof. We know time runs everything so why not a time-sensitive mechanical setup? Trial and error is not a choice but a predicament. We can't do better until we have experimental proof of this new law called the conservation of movement or time law
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar Tesla never beleived in overunity. He beleived he could use the atmosphere like a battery. One which would be constantly kept charged by the same processes that generate thunderstoms. You wanna know what would really happen if an overunity generator was created? The moment it reached over 100% efficency it would overload and burn out. And thats if it was not impossible to do in the first place.
kurisu925 1 year ago
@kurisu Each has his own words for it. Overunity, radiant energy, Zero-point energy etc. What's in a name? Your saying about what happens if we do catch time energy, that we immediately would lose control is nonsense. The first thing one will do is limit the flow, control the flow. What else would be the purpose of the machine? It is not something like a flat tire with all energy flooding out suddenly. It is more a valve in which you control the access. See e.g. Thomas Henry Moray (at my site)
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar acutally teslas was a radiant energy device that harnessed the cosmic rays that all large suns throw off at unbelieveably high voltage, these particles are going so fast that they pass through everything, he made a device that would harness these particles to make energy, i show a very basic device gathering energy to show that it does work. tell me when you get a device that keeps going, i love magnet motors!
boxa888 1 year ago
Read the following with ventilator breath and satanic tones of Darth Vader: "Do not traduce the name of Bearden or I will have your spinal discs for shower curtain rings."
ironpirites 2 years ago
LOL, yes I will convert the dark side into clean green energy!
anandaadhar 2 years ago
WHat on Earth is going on here?
FourTrotters 2 years ago
Not the earth, we look for the sky.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Like I said, you better go back to school and do some research. And throw away that Tom Bearden magic sleight of hand stuff.
fgleich 2 years ago
I do research and even experiment, but what are you doing?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Another 'Go back to school...' 'Go read a physics textbook' or 'I hope you aren't taking a physics course...' type comment.
Why don't you lot just piss off, and stop bitching about people who are trying to make a difference?
What we are taught in school/University is conventional physics, what these people are doing is researching UN- conventional physics. Going to school, buying a textbook etc etc etc (ad nauseum) will only go towards facilitating the research, not the other way around.
spikeychops 2 years ago
um, you should reread what I wrote.
fgleich 2 years ago
Just read a couple of your posts further up...slightly embarrassing, but hey ho...What have you got against Tom BTW? Hasn't he just had a patent granted for his gizmo the 'MEG'? Patents are not usually given out willy nilly are they? Perhaps they are..
You seem certain he's not legit, can you offer any proof or evidence of this?
I genuinely interested, and this isn't me saying 'put up or shut up' or whatever.
spikeychops 2 years ago
I've never seen a person more full of nonsense and spouting goobledygook than Tom Beardon. If you want a real explanation of all this free energy stuff, you need to look at someone skilled in this field, like, for instance, Harold Aspden, a PhD electrical engineer whose PhD thesis was in anomalus heating effects caused by 'free energy' in transformer iron. John Bedini has discovered an effect, but he really doesnt understand what causes it either. I think you and others need to do more research
fgleich 2 years ago
I know very well Aspden, He is an old boy with a nice website and theoretical proposals, He has a few patens and was a patent attorney himself. He was associated with the autralian Adams switched reluctance motor development. There are claims of overunity in that department but replications as yet proved to fail in that. But Bearden and Bedini walk another path. I don't call that path lesser. They were succesfully replicated by some, so far the claims go. Don't just suppose I'm ignorant, guesser
anandaadhar 2 years ago
If that's all you got from looking at his website, you must have spent less that an hour looking at it. There's a WHOLE lot more there than what you mention, AND an experiment you can replicate which proves the existence of free energy. Like I said.......but you can stumble around if you want :D
Good luck
fgleich 2 years ago
Let each follow his own way, okay? Respect.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
I built my own Magnetic Generator that powers all my kitchen appliances using the plans at:
magniwork-review.blogspot(DOT)com
abmod03 2 years ago
Comment removed
taraff1 2 years ago
magnets are the future. pls proceed your work. respect and thx. :)
pixelcomet 2 years ago
Comment removed
studentofscience 2 years ago
It wouldn't even keep turning with all the help you were giving it. You turned the turntable by hand and then you flip the top thing by hand, and still it doesn't turn in any synchronous way. It's been almost a year and a half since you posted this video. I bet you still have the same problems.
1980PintoMan 2 years ago
See my later videos. With a bigger disc and a bigger stator, like a disc magnet, spin is easier to acquire. But always the input of a moving stator is required. The question is whether we can create a vibration with a feedbackloop to the disc that is selfsustaining with the energy of space. As u yet no success , just theories that fail to prove right. Still tere are non-replicable 'successes'. At least this 'overunity' effect is replicable. In fact is is not overunity until it can feed itself.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
so to observe the overunity in this mechanism you just need to synch them togther?
sharkhead7854 2 years ago
We have theories on how we could harness this reaction force of magnets. As yet the breakthrough has not been achieved. But many are trying, and some report success. But replication as yet has not been successful
anandaadhar 2 years ago
By converting space energy (vacuum energy) into kinetic energy of course, what else? That is what we test with this experiment. And yes it is not concluded. What are you yourself, a sceptic or an idealist? What do you yourself practically? Just words I don't care about really. The action hero is one, the rest is bystander.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Skeptic or idealist? You somehow conclude they are mutually exclusive? Not on your Nelly.
Idealism to me is living in a faithless society where all the supposed merits of religion, such as moral values, charity etc are accepted as normal human behavior without some make believe God mindset.
zzytrewq 2 years ago
I agree a good idealist is a sceptic against prefixed standard notions that were found ineffective in making a better world. Thus he is pushing he envelope of what is considered possible. That is what I do. I investigate the possibility to set magnetism against other natural forces in such a way that the natural dynamics of time between those force manifest themselves. One has to think outside the box for that and seek other explanations and theories than the conventional ones.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
You dont know what ye do my friend, ask me and I will tell you if ye find free energy you are a dead man. Amagine how happy the oil monsters gonna be if ye let them know theyre out of bussiness. There is free energy, you have the right idea in magnets, but ye play with fire, real fire.
2261961 2 years ago
Magnets have fascinated perpetual motion desingers because they are bit mystical and harder to comprehend than sticks or string. In my point of view you might as well try to make it work with sticks and string.
You can try to jump up and down million times and try to hope that at some jump gravity just dissapears and proves that physics theory and sceptics have been wrong. You can jump your whole life and wish for that but intelligent ones figure out more clever things to put their mind on to.
ilkkahy 2 years ago
You take sides in a paradigmatic conflict between the rational and practical appoaches of science. I chosethe practical side. Moving magnets create electricity, do that with string and sticks! We benefit from them. They polarize the chaos of space energy around them. All we have to do is to uitilize this polarity in a rotating setup. That is how motors work. It is just the quantum mechanics that we are nerding with. So that's what we work on. idealists lead, sceptics complain and criticize.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Skeptics attempt to bring the unscientific back to reality.
Idealists feel they shouldn't be constrained by not only conventional thinking, but conventional fundamental scientific thinking.
Ask yourself, how on earth can a device deliver more energy than it consumes to function?
zzytrewq 2 years ago
By converting space energy, That is the quantum mechanical point ii a magnet motor, it is a converter of energy. Old physics supposes thevacuum is empty new physics suppose it is an energy phenomenon. Space is a medium with material qualities, as such there is an ether. This is what Einstein said in 1920 confessing he had been too radical in his former declaration that the concept of the ether was unnecessary because is was difficult to measure physically. Naturally, for ether is protomaterial!
anandaadhar 2 years ago
I agree with zzytrewq 100%. Why this propel head doesnt create simple mechanism between the "pusher" part and the spinning disc is because he doesnt get it working without putting energy to the system from his body.
ilkkahy 2 years ago
I am working on exactly that, see my video's. I haven't finished with this cakra-spinner yet.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
All these "free energy" motors are being developed by people who never studied physics and are thus not constrained by the mere laws of physics.
If these motors were powered by faith they would run forever - but alas they are all doomed to failure.
I'll take any bets that no one will ever get one to work.
Any takers?
zzytrewq 2 years ago
Yes, let me give it a try, I am a strong believer!
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Oh come on, you accepted the challenge, where's the bet?
Let's say a nominal $10 bet and 6 months to make it work.
The loser gives the winnings to a charity nominated by the winner. It relies on trust.
Best of luck.
zzytrewq 2 years ago
Bet your life, you hero!
anandaadhar 2 years ago
I need you to to run a simple experiment. Make a flywheel put a magnet on it, and spin it freely watch how many times it turns. Then affix a stationary magnet alongside of this flywheel. Attempt to get the wheel to spin the same number of times you did in the first run. Then tell me there is no "Mechanical interaction between magnets" - it will require more energy to spin the wheel the same number of times than it did without the stationary magnet. Because there was a mechanical interaction.
prozacgod 3 years ago
Indeed, that is exactly the crucial point. In version 5.0 (see my page) I demonstarte a spindown near to a naked run. As soon as the interaction delivers a better spindown than a maked setup we have more or less the proof of magnetic overunity. As yet I jhave not succeded in this. There are effects like of Hamel, but they do not exceed the input. We haven't found the trick as yet, nor me, nor many others, except for Searl and Finsrud, to keep a chronic imbalance that defeats the conservation law
anandaadhar 3 years ago
"As yet I jhave not succeded in this"
Don't you get it? You never WILL "succeed in this" because it is impossible. You are wasting your time. As were all the other millions of people who have been trying to do this or similar things for the last several thousand years. The laws of conservation of energy are carved in stone and you CANNOT beat them. It really IS that simple.
bollox93 3 years ago
What you say is an opinion, not fact, Google for Finsrud, he has a working gravito-magnetic selfrruner. He smartly controls the natural unrest of a chaos pendulum with three other pendulums relative to a steel ball on a dynamic track attached to the central chaos pendulum. He defeats your so-called laws. There is appratently also a law of conservation of field energy. So it thus works when one stresses the fields with gravity and there you are. Nature conserves the field. What do you say now?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
"What you say is an opinion, not fact"
There's your first mistake. What I say is a fact. What you say is simply naive bullshit spouted by a "believer". Science is science. Religion is what you spout.
"he has a working gravito-magnetic selfrruner"
No he doesn't. He produces pieces of art not science.
The laws of physics are not negotiable. Especially by a scam artist or pseudoscientist on youtube.
bollox93 3 years ago
You don't check the facts I point out. You ignore that the Finsrud machine works without any input. You simply say bullshit and call that science, No that is scepticism. Is that science? Now that is naive belief! True science admits: we do not know it all and have to keep an open mind and prove everything by experiment. Finsrud delivers proof you don't want to know. The way you are you trust another. Now that is psycholgy, not physics.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
I'm afraid you're wrong. His machine has not been inspected or tested by a SINGLE scientist. It is hidden from inspection. NOBODY is allowed to inspect it. And did you also forget that they "have to keep stopping it to clean it" and that only Finsrud's own team are allowed to clean it? It is a nice piece of art.
bollox93 3 years ago
The free energy researcher Don Asitis of theverylastpageon theinternet (now at internetarchive) has visited him and written an extensive report, after talking to Finsrud and discussing and checking his machine. From that report I have my confidence in the genuine nature of the contraption.But you are right, there is only certainty if I can manage to replicate. One has to believe in a possible true effect, study the logics and then find a way with it.That is what I try. Just conjecture or refute.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
Do you not think it a little convenient that the only reference you can cite is a joke webpage that no longer exists?
bollox93 3 years ago
The page is still in the internet archive, I downloaded it before the site disappeared. It was certainly not a joke website. Check my free energy pages a my site theorderoftime ,org where I processed much of his information. Link upper right infobox. There is also another YouTube movie on him of someobe analyzing a norwegian newspaperarticle on him. watch?v=rBQSl3GexPM You can also check Finsruds site where he shows many drawings of his design of the machine.Google it or follow from my website.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
He has to keep stopping it to "clean it". Only him or his people have ever cleaned it. No one else is allowed near it.
We read "clean it" as "wind it back up".
Get real.
bollox93 3 years ago
Would you allow people to touch your work when that must not be disturbed to keep functioning? It is a perpetuum motion device you understand. It cannot work when every one is allowed to touch it. Finsrud is an anti-materialist artist. He wants nothing with formal science with all its endless speculations, doubts and scepticism. Erwing Schrödinger said: I believe a magnet motor is possible, only we science idiots can't do it. Only an outsider can. So. And he won the Nobel prize. You doubt them?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
"Would you allow people to touch your work when that must not be disturbed to keep functioning?"
Yes. Absolutely. Unless, of course, I was hiding something.
bollox93 3 years ago
You are clearly not an artist. Ever been in a museum? By the way why do you care so much about matters you don't believe in? Preaching science you may leave to Erwin Schrodinger and other renown physcists. At least they dare to doubt their own paradigm. Why do yuo think physics is such a closed front? They don't agree at all. Even Einstein said in 1920 In Leyden the Netherlands (my country) that he had been too radical in denying the ether. So who are you at all?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
"You are clearly not an artist."
Spot on. I'm not an artist. I am a scientist. I rest my case.
bollox93 3 years ago
I am a scientist too but I hold on. That's the difference.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
I find that somewhat difficult to believe having looked at your website.
bollox93 3 years ago
Your disbelief is your problem, not mine.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
That's precisely where you're wrong. My disbelief is to my advantage.
Your belief is your problem.
bollox93 3 years ago
In way yes, i face the problem, you don't. Guess who has the biggest chance of achieving? And you say thus that non-achieving is to your advantage? What kind of philosophy is that? Even the greatest yogi wnat to achieve the association of his favorite godhead and the enlightenment of his emancipatiowith it. So wha actaully is your confession, what is your science? Nuts and bolts only? That won't save the world you know!
anandaadhar 3 years ago
"Guess who has the biggest chance of achieving?"
You see that's another problem you have. You think because you believe in something that is impossible you have a better chance of achieving it. That is very strange logic.
Just because you "believe" doesn't make the impossible suddenly possible.
I know it is impossible, you don't. Neither of us can achieve it. But I won't have wasted my time trying. You will.
bollox93 3 years ago
No i don't indeed, "I only know I don't know", said Socrates, "but You statesman, you just pretend to know". For this he was poisoned. So you agree with this execution of the founder of our western philosophy..., I am not an heretic in his school. What are you, stressing what is known and denying what is unknown? How to explore and discover then? How to progress? Yes, it is a act of belief. How to attain without it? I really don't get why you are so committed to something you don't care about...
anandaadhar 3 years ago
So where's the working one then?
Oh, wait, there isn't one. I wonder why that is.
Do you think impossibility might have something to do with it?
bollox93 3 years ago
Listen, now we are repeating ourselves, Finsrud is has the working one. You don't care about it. Fine. So leave it. Thus you should now look another way. Whatdo you want now? Want to get the better of me? Do you really think you can convince of your sceptcism? Come on!
anandaadhar 3 years ago
I don't want anything. But I do hate to see people wasting their lives on something that is impossible. Finsrud made a piece of art. He's laughing at everyone. It's clockwork.
bollox93 3 years ago
Your opinion. Fine, I don't agree. Okay?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
Yes of course it's fine. We agree to disagree. But I'm right and you're not :P
bollox93 3 years ago
Okay, time will tell.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
Imagination and the belief in what everyone thought was impossible is the story of human development. Think of all the technology we have today which at some point in history was considered to be impossible. Somehow, imagination always prevails. we should fund this kind of research. At the very least we may find other applications for similar technologies.
kroznot 3 years ago
"Think of all the technology we have today which at some point in history was considered to be impossible"
This is where your confusion lies. I can't think of anything we have today that was ever considered "impossible". Difficult yes, beyond human ability or knowledge yes. But there were no laws of physics (as undersood then) making them "impossible".
This IS impossible.
bollox93 3 years ago
What you consider to be the Laws of physics, I consider to be no more than our most recent attempt at understanding the universe, the best models we have come up with so far. If you are convinced of your limitations, you are not likely move past them. Read some quantum physics, maybe it will open your horizons a bit.
kroznot 3 years ago
"If you are convinced of your limitations, you are not likely move past them"
And if you refuse to accept impossiblities as being impossible you will waste your life trying to do something that cannot be done.
bollox93 3 years ago
ummm. I recall someone saying we couldnt fly..
Griffith181 3 years ago
Cite me a reference where the scientific community said lfight was against the known laws of physics. You can't because it was never said. You've read too many fairy tales.
bollox93 3 years ago
"Think of all the technology we have today which at some point in history was considered to be impossible"
Name one and cite references. I bet you can't.
bollox93 3 years ago
200 years ago there were plenty of people who would have argued that cars, planes, cellphones, cloning, space travel and many other common technologies of our day were impossible. My position is that our only limitation is our imagination and i think history backs me up on this. I am not impressed by those who dogmatically claim that what they can't imagine personally is impossible for someone who has a better imagination than they do.
kroznot 3 years ago 7
You didn't answer the question, as I expected.
Quote me a known law of physics, as understood then, that prevented one of those things. You can't.
But there are known laws of physics that prevent this bullshit. Now wake up and face reality.
bollox93 3 years ago
you seem to be very convinced that the laws of physics are the deepest understanding that we will ever have. No point in discussing much further. I don't have ready access to what people believed were immutable laws throughout history but i know that our understanding of nature continues to grow and i am equally as confident that as we further understand and define laws of quantum physics, we will do things that physics says cant be done. Time will tell, eh? good luck to you.
kroznot 3 years ago 3
Conservation of energy is a fact. Just deal with it, accept it, and put a stop to your pipedreams.
bollox93 3 years ago
I remember an article where many people doubted space travel because the rocket engine "wouldn't have anything to push against" as they didn't understand how rockets are actually propelled.
Even found a reference to it". Goggle "the cannonball approach to space travel"
I'm not doing this to claim your bet but just to let you know about a bit of history of thinking with regards to technology.
Cheers
zzytrewq 2 years ago
"I remember an article where many people doubted space travel because......"
The man in the street didn't understand. But scientists understood. That has been the case for hundreds of years where rocket power is concerned.
Newton formulated it and he died nearly 300 years ago.
And that is exactly the case here. Scientists understand. The man in the street doesn't. However he also will NOT be told by those who DO understand.
Thank you for confirming what I say.
bollox93 2 years ago
There are many more examples of sceptical approaches against scientific things we consider normal these days like flying with crafts heavier than air. There is always resistance from the ego of the sitting powers. But progress, cultural evoluton is inevitable. Our resistance of ego against the uncertainties at border lines of scientific ego may be compared to the dogmatism of the Catholic Church against reform. Reform is the nature of progress, blocking it leads to mental disease and warfare.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Well, for example Van der graaf generator is sort of a string...
When you study enough physics, at some point most people understand that energy just changes its form and it all makes sense.
I wanted to invent perpetural motion machine when i was a child.
Good luck getting the mechanism working. I would be glad if i was wrong.
ilkkahy 2 years ago
Of course I don't want to create energy, I want to convert space energy into kinetic energy.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Previous skepticism was not supported by scientific evidence. Nowadays we have a greater understanding of scientific principles.
Comparing a perceived lack of support to non workable concepts with the unscientific dogma of the Catholic church, a purely faith based organization is nonsense.
This is not about reform, which is a social/political viewpoint, this is about pure science.
You need to go back to basics and stop making this some imaginary war between vision and reality.
zzytrewq 2 years ago
What you say, sketicism must be supported by scientific evidence. Also refutation is an experimental result, not just a paradigmatic judgement. We understand quantummechanics to be the basis for magnets motors. Heisenberg considered it possible. See my Finsrud analysis of his perpetual motion. Scientific reform is inevitable with successful experiments and cannot be considered apart from societal and social reform either. Ships with the same cultural evolution that cannot be stopped by anyone.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Eastern Mysticism has nothing to do with nuts and bolts solutions. Things that operate in the physical universe only do so in the physical universe. And are subject to the natural laws of that universe.
4G3NTanon 2 years ago
Vishnu stands for the ether. There are three Vishnu's , thus there are three ethers of which the interaction, by Einstein, we have the universe as a condensation of that primordial energy. Einsten calls it spacetime. The veda;s speak of pradhana. it is the same thing. We get energy from it spiritually, and why wouldn't that be mechanically proven?Actually Mylow has delivered the proof recently. See watch?v=sPDXsrrs398 Spirituality bridges the gap between matter and protomatter or space energy.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
I am a self-employed electronics engineer. If I had to include all of that psycho-babble in my work, I would be out of business. I prefer results over wishful thinking. By the way, the reason your wheel rotates at all is because of the kinetic energy added by your hand movements. THERE IS NO ENERGY IN MAGNETS, just magnetic force.
4G3NTanon 2 years ago
You have a big mouth, but you didn't follow the link I gave you. There you see energy from magnets keeping a rotor spinning. Also look for Finsrud. watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q Yes it breaks the equivalence principle (google it) and yes, Einstein is down the drain then. Sorry for that. But that is how science is. Facts rule, mind it. And practical minded people like you should learn to act to it. As for the "babble": First think then act, first pray, then work. Isn't that the common sense about it all?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Procrastinator
AClarke2007 2 years ago
There are two types of makebelief. One is the belief in a theory without suficient proof for definitive conjecture or refutation, The other suggests a success but it is not replicable. The first type is the correct one and constitutes the lead of all scientific experimentation. Indeed the final operative design is in a time perspective, but it is not procrastination. Procrastination implies knowledge of the definyive setup. About that the first option is never sure, the second is, but cheats.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
There are extensive discussions about Finsrud at the overunity and steorn forums and at Peswiki they also have a page about his machine. You are really the only one seriously interested in free energy devices who is so darn sceptical about him. He, together with Searl, Bedini and Bearden is one of the few real pillars of practical proof that keep going thousands of researchers (and practicle minded idealist believers of course).
anandaadhar 3 years ago
anandaadhar .. I checked your website and your credability (AND street cred AND karma) dropped to 0.. There's a book called "Továrna na Absolutno" by Karel Čapek that has generators running on "nothing". That was fun to read, it's called fiction, just like your opinions mate.. =/
8DX 3 years ago
I don't know that book, never heard of it. That fiction is yours. I go for facts not fiction, and if you mean to say that science is in agreement about facts you are wrong. They move in conflicting paradigms. Quantum mechanics e.g. is dealing with effects the Newtonians -people like you I presume -can't explain, And why should I care about you believing or not? Believe or not believe is your problem. I just do what I can to help us out of the illusion of control that destroys the world.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
One thing: when writing on YouTube I would recommend using understandable English: paradigm is a word nobody uses, say "pattern" instead, or "model". Whatever you do with magnets, don't you see that energy MUST come from somewhere .. you can get near-perpetual motion machines that CONSERVE the energy they have, not generate it. It's not a case of believing, your work is not based on scientific principles and scientific approach (theory -> experiment -> proof). This talk here is just philosophy..
8DX 3 years ago
Yes it is philosphy until the theory is proven, sure. So I say we transform space energy into usable one, You say from your paradigm it does not exist. I insist you use a dictionary to fight your ignorance and not repress half that book. And thats why we have this experiment: to deliver experimental proof, to confirm with that thefindings a few examples that seemed hopeful and promising. Science is there of conjecture and refutation (look it up) We need an incentive, and then wonder: is it true?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
Paradigm is perfectly allright to use. Paradigm: technical a typical example or pattern of something; also in: the discovery of universal gravitation became the paradigm of successful science. And 8DX, don't you believe in yourself??
123sakhya 3 years ago
i was going to make a post about these movies, but i see someone had already said the EXACT thing i wanted to say so ill just repost his
"it works. the people arguing you are trying to discredit you. have the strength to overcome. these are people that will try anything to stop you from making this even a thought in someones head, let alone an element in their everyday lives." by samsblakdog
CondemnedPatriot 3 years ago
Thanks for your support. I keep researching, experimenting and pushing the limit for the sake of a definite mechanical proof of natural OU, or the selfrunning status. The science encounter with the reality of the ether 'of the third kind'.....
anandaadhar 3 years ago
electrical and electromagnetic proof is OK. But you could not overcome second law of thermodynamics. Let me explain, the pulse you intend to give the system should be more than the rotational inertia of the magnet. So sorry buddy you have not achieved anything special. It is not producing energy, but converting your muscular energy into rotation of the wheel. Although a OK concept... IT WON'T WORK. Good luck with your work, don't quit your day job. Nice work on video making..
goobegudde 3 years ago
Just to clarify, I did watch all your videos. You can't make it self running because of the inherent frictional losses. Even with a frictionless drive like couette flow bearing you will not be able to produce energy...
goobegudde 3 years ago
We'll keep trying to get a machine representing the restlessness of the universe. No energy produced, but space energy converted into usable energy.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
hujovina
nordicwolf29 3 years ago
Hujovina means the inanimate in Russian. If you mean to say that dead things will never come to life, just look at all the universe spinning around. All of matter is in flux, isn't it? Panta Rhei said Heracleitos. Why would our machine not pick up anything of that movement? Souds simple not?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
To be clear he is not russian but polish, and what he ment was more or less 'piece of crap' but more rude.
Joru666 3 years ago
Thanks
anandaadhar 3 years ago
it works. the people arguing you are trying to discredit you. have the strength to overcome. these are people that will try anything to stop you from making this even a thought in someones head, let alone an element in their everyday lives.
samsblakdog 3 years ago 3
The Hamel effect of this cakra works indeed, but to prove it as overunity in the form of a selfrunner is something different. The feedback principle proves not to work as I wished (see my vid called trials and conclusion) But i keep trying with Hamel despite of initial faillures. Trial and error is the way of science. Thanks for the support.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
yo veo que mueve todo con la mano
josegonzales09 3 years ago
If that means in English that you are complaining that I move the thing with my hand, please read previous discussions about this. The point is to take the hand ut of the equation , if that works has the experiment into OU succeeded. E We keep trying.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
The existence of Gravitons has not been proven yet. It is only theorized to exist as one possible explaination of gravity. As a transfer particle like gluons are for the strong force. The existence of vacuum energy or zero-point energy is also not proven. You need to establish this BEFORE you can claim anything... or else you break the conservation of energy law!!!
Joeviocoe 3 years ago
Conservation of energy law is only true for closed systems, we are talking about open systems. Zero-point energy is a normal concept in science, see wikipedia. See also Tom Valone on this and the fysicist Thomas Bearden on vacuum energy. Theory of gravitons is applicable to the experimental effects observed in this research. Theory is needed. Proof of many overunity effects is there. See e.g. cold fusion. That is how it is. Study before you say things like this.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
1. Dynamo to recollect energy?
2. Computer to calculate the rythm?
3. Software to record and duplicate the rythm?
4. Software to control a motor fed by dynamo?
5. Motor moves magnet at precise rythm?
6. Free energy based on dynamo powered motor,
fed by magnetic rythm?
ISRAELITECHURCH 3 years ago
That is the way proven already by Bearden and Bedini. Now we try this feedback and control purely mechanical. That proof is needed for the paradigm to turn over. We are now in phase three:
Phase 1: the cakra-pulse plate with fixed stator
Phase 2: the feedback loop with a second stator
Phase 3: the stabilization and reinforcement of the pulse in the loop.
With these three completed it should self run. If not then there are also three options:
1) too clumsy
2) too impatient
3) no mechanical OU.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
Claims of overunity to not hold water here. Make it a self-runner without human touch, then we'll talk!
shubus 4 years ago
Right you are! We are working for a device for the mechanical proof of magnetic overunity. Otherwise all talk is useless. (electronic and electromagnetic is proven already)
anandaadhar 4 years ago
i just dont think people will consider that the "ultimate technology", a machine that creates energy and doesnt only consume it. I rly need to see a self driven rapid acceleration.
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
As yet you are referred to the aliens in their flying saucers. They accomplish that, so it is possible. We try to copy that, but it's not that easey. Step by step, principle by principle we progress. That is the only way. We first need a magnetic selfrunner that is easily replicable, Then education has a thing to explain and demonstrate, Then we'll scale up.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
yes but i mean no human assistance, im sure if u can build this u can build a autotrigger working off the free mechanical energy. and the device makes itself accelerate consistently until like 20 secs later it about to break.
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
We'll do our best and keep you posted (if you do the same) except for that last oart of accellerating into a break. We actually aim at a slow spinner called A Device for the Proof of Magnetic Overunity that keeps running stable without accellerating or slowing. Autostaring is an ideal.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
fancy talk, but i think its all talk. show me a video of the machine working on its own and getting faster. Ignorance may be bliss, but physical results talk. Until then, I think i can still say im skeptical.
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
Try the OC MPMM vid (see to the right magnet motor free power or my favorites). That is magnets accellerating.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
Anyone with a good I.Q. can see that this device does indeed work. He has documented this and shared it with us kindly. His intention is not to please random strangers on youtube, who say "prove it to me, and show me a better example". He's showing us this so those of us who have eyes to see can follow along. Besides that, Myth Busters already proved free energy. It's no longer debatable.
AlchemistShaman 3 years ago
lmao you sounded so believeable but you blew it with the mythbusters line
longjohncider 3 years ago
so there is hidden free energy, but simple gravity is doesnt allow it to occur. If u can unpolarise magnetism, u may gain energy by using unpolarised magnet to gain altitude, then collect the energy from the freefall.
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
Without the magnetic dipole you will not be able to let those gravitons, those gravity particles, do work for you. It is because of the polarity that the magnet does work. Gravity is not the hindrance, our ignorance is the greatest hindrance.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
just cuz something has 99.99% effiency, doesnt mean its drawing in free energy, hell even 100% effiency doesnt support it. If u have a pendulum in a vacuum and its rotating joint is magnetically suspended, it will maintain the same speed and max height forever. Gravity does in a way support free energy because objects never in earths gravity may gain energy from acceleration, disproving lifting a mass into orbit is just "storing energy potential" because the energy from fall=energy to lift.
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
Listen COP>1 has been proven already.Sprain has patented recently a setup with a magnetic circle with a gate. You can see that in the list to the right: Maget Motor free energy. He uses an electromagnet that uses 3 voolts whle the device delivers 6.1 volts. Now that os more than 100% overunity. We need to d it mechanically, Okay?
anandaadhar 4 years ago
the point is that u cannot create a gravitational field strong enuff to do jack on a reasonable level, gravity is very weak because it is spread out over many universes that occupy the same spacetime, magnetism is believe to be a focused and polarised use of the missing gravity. In relative of strength of gravity to say strong force, even a small amount of matter would have considerable gravity fields. So if we found a way to depolarise magnetism, we could use a type of free energy to levitate.
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
Others could (see my favorites), so why can't we with this design? Rotation does the trick of drawing in the energy. Zsabo calls it energy by motion. We have an easy pulse here. So... Gravity may be relatively weak, but from the stuff of the gravitons is everything else created, so that useless it isn't either.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
Others could (see my favorites) So why wouldn't we with this design? Gravity might be weak relatively, but gravitons is the stuff that all matter originated from. Depolarization of magnets gives a monopole. The universe is such a monopole driving the energy of its expansion for us to use. So let's try it...qualms should not hinder but lead ahead.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
duh empty space doesnt exist. i assumed that when i saw nothing in it. XD
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
Space is an extension, just like any other body with substance. You cannot separate space from matter, even Einstein said this. Space without physical properties is unthinkable.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
As I was watching I detected a pendulum movement, so my suggestion is to try putting a pendulum arm on one side of the exciter axle, see if anything changes.
Rotitomato 4 years ago
the pendulum have less total energy than the disc will come to a dead spot and barely budge and the disc rotates.
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
Finrud (see my favorites) combines pendulums with magnetism and achieved 99.99 % of efficiency: his 'perpetuum mobile' runs for days on one install.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
Still not a bad idea, Finrud, an artist, (see my favorites) made a machine that runs for days on one install. His 'perpetuum mobile' delivers that way 99.99.% COP. He uses a combination of pendulums and magnetism.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
then r u further suggesting that these systems rely on the presence of gravitational fields? Then this is useless in space, o poo
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
Ever heard of the gravitational lenses formed by galaxies that Einstein predicted woud bend the trajectory of light in outer space? It is a proven fact that the universe is ruled by gravitational fields. Descartes said already; empty space does not exist. And he proved to be right.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
but when u say unlimited, ur saying all the energy of the air around it until it reaches absolute zero?
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
No not the air, it is the energy of space. Space consists of gravity fields (spacetime distortions). These fields are made up of gravitons: particles with a double spin which are polarized by the magnets. These polarized particles do work. To catch that work is the essence of the overunity quest.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
if u wanna prove a perpetual machine, have the output feed the input. If perpetual, the machine should always be accelerating.
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
Correct, this has been accomplished by Searl, who lost several of his SEG-machines who simply took off through his roof into space by their increasing anti-gravity, because that is the fate of having such a machine without a break.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
if over unity was achieved it may seem perpetual but instead u would have made a machine that directly absorbs ambient thermal energy and therefore is a endothermic mechanical structure. If u do the math right that as the temp goes down, the flux trapping becomes less efficient.
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
The latter I wouldn'd say. There is indeed a cooling effect with overunity graviton converters (like with the magnetic oscillation system of Sweet) But that supply of energy is unlimited, there is no diminution or loss of vacuum energy. That is the beauty of the thing!
anandaadhar 4 years ago
sorry to say but the energy to move that center thing also will create resistence equal to the energy u r adding each sweep.
pimpmastahanh 4 years ago
The idea is to overcome that by feeding back the overunity. Indeed it is the question if we can prove there is overunity.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
It might be better if you were to have some tripod clamps to hold the actuator rather than you using your hands. From then on just use small adjustments of the tripod clamps.
iain9876 4 years ago
See my later video's, e are in phase three already, fter having fixed the staor and having realized the feedback loop. Now we have to control the OU in the loop. (see my IPMM MAN device video)
anandaadhar 3 years ago
What i love is learning what i was never taught in school. I was told absolute values, that the consept of perpetual motion should never be investigated, as an Absolute.
cycimian 4 years ago
The angle of interaction is also critical.
electrogravitic 4 years ago