Molecular dissociation? I looked up your theory hoping you were right and what I found was your claim is laughable, for molecular dissociation to take you need to achieve tempertures that rival the surface temperture of the sun, thats 11,000 degrees F., really? Thats your debunking arguement? Your an idiot and go back to high school physics, remember info is readily available on the net so come up with something that actually is possible!
Thermite and bombs emits a LOT of heat, 2000F and more. It's a direct transfer. It's conventional.
The heat would have stayed on the molecules of the dust cloud. And people would have been burned and a lot would have died from being in the dust cloud... hence, I do not believe in thermite... and many other reasons.
@FringeReality It does seem to me that there was something in the dust that when it came in contact with the metal of cars it may have had some kind of reaction that started these fires, "toasted cars". It seems plausible that on the Monday before 9/11 the buildings were shut down, pallets of this power, whether thermite or something else, could have been put on a bunch of floors. What would it be? Maybe it was used with other kind of weaponry that targeted the dust, making it corrosive.
No! They didn't put anything in the towers... It cannot be done like that. You cannot start to put thermite and explosives everywhere. Did anyone saw real fiery explosion anyway, like in a real demolition? No! Thermite also weights WAY too much for the towers to withhold.
Did the dust cloud killed ANYONE, let alone burn someone? No! 2000F+ cannot cool down like that. NO KINETIC HEAT was used to destroy the towers, hence no thermite and explosions. It was molecular dissociation.
Molecular dissociation? I looked up your theory hoping you were right and what I found was your claim is laughable, for molecular dissociation to take you need to achieve tempertures that rival the surface temperture of the sun, thats 11,000 degrees F., really? Thats your debunking arguement? Your an idiot and go back to high school physics, remember info is readily available on the net so come up with something that actually is possible!
mjszadis 1 year ago
When you are saying that this is NOT the result of thermite...why couldn't it be a combination of thermite and "molecular dissociation"?
sablechicken 1 year ago
@sablechicken
Thermite and bombs emits a LOT of heat, 2000F and more. It's a direct transfer. It's conventional.
The heat would have stayed on the molecules of the dust cloud. And people would have been burned and a lot would have died from being in the dust cloud... hence, I do not believe in thermite... and many other reasons.
FringeReality 1 year ago
@FringeReality It does seem to me that there was something in the dust that when it came in contact with the metal of cars it may have had some kind of reaction that started these fires, "toasted cars". It seems plausible that on the Monday before 9/11 the buildings were shut down, pallets of this power, whether thermite or something else, could have been put on a bunch of floors. What would it be? Maybe it was used with other kind of weaponry that targeted the dust, making it corrosive.
sablechicken 1 year ago
@sablechicken
No! They didn't put anything in the towers... It cannot be done like that. You cannot start to put thermite and explosives everywhere. Did anyone saw real fiery explosion anyway, like in a real demolition? No! Thermite also weights WAY too much for the towers to withhold.
Did the dust cloud killed ANYONE, let alone burn someone? No! 2000F+ cannot cool down like that. NO KINETIC HEAT was used to destroy the towers, hence no thermite and explosions. It was molecular dissociation.
FringeReality 1 year ago