Rolling Stones - unreleased track from Bigger Bang

[Ansfreedom]

this is fake

[glimmertwins2]

this surely arent the stone sin any way believe me, even searched the bootlegs, no way this are the stones

[olwltd]

This is not Rolling Stones.

So much worse in every way.

[guachoinfernal]

they are idiots who think we can believe evil of asthmatic screaming tones sung are the Rollings. escuhe and before this idiot singing like Jagger. shameful. sings like a thousand shit ahahaha

[mickchick01]

I believe thats them..That sure sounds like them playing..

[erikjromano]

This isn't the Rolling Stones. Wrong band pal.

[howlinwolf73]

NOT the Stones. NO OUTTAKE. Could be a Stones song if they did.

[RodRollingStone]

Definitely NOT the Stones, but in the Stones genre, of course.

[rolling422]

good song but not mick or the boyz

[dannyd1572]

NOT THE STONES!

[MrAlvarosantiagoferr]

this is not stones!

[amoradox1]

Definitely not Mick, Keith, Mick, nor Charlie. But a pretty good imitation of the Stones sound.

[mherrenschmidt]

Wow, the 'tribute' bands, wannabes,garage bands with no future etc.....u guys never quit!! Shameless, especially when it sounds like a half-ass attempt of 'sounding' like the Stones, but in the wrong era to boot! Aside from the bad Mick impression, any Stones fan would know CHARLIE's drum sound has become the most recognizable signature to any of the Stones releases since Steel Wheels...... this was crap from the first beat....FAIL! Try again suckerz!

[RyanMaloner]

@mherrenschmidt ur a fag

[mherrenschmidt]

@RyanMaloner thats nice....anything else?

[GCOUNDOU]

session musicians

[FORDCOUNTRY7885]

I got this song on an "advance" copy of A Bigger Bang back in 2005, along with two other songs that were very suspicious in nature, though the rest of the songs on the disc were legitimate songs from that album.

That's obviously not Mick singing, though otherwise, it's a passable Stones imitation. Problem is, it's early 70's Stones they're imitating, and not 2005 Stones.

If this had ended up on a bootleg of Sticky Fingers or Exile outtakes, it would have been far more passable as the real deal

[TasteforEden]

At the opening riff I COULD have believed it was the Stones, as this is an obvious attempt to emulate them. As others have stated here, it's certainly NOT the Stones! I don't think the vocals are even close to Jagger. I'll say it's not a bad song, however.

[bannelee]

not the stones.no way is that mick jagger!

[ZOOTV1991]

This seriously could be the Rolling Clones doing an original song. Stonesy feel to it, and not a bad song to boot, but not the boys we love.

[MrJsmyers]

This is not the fucking Stones!

[jillemwanus]

My old anty sounds More Like Them !!



[202pdiddy]

Obviously not the Rolling Stones.

[Jag2danc]

If you listen to Rolling Stones Criss Cross unreleased track you will understand what i mean by my last comment

[Jag2danc]

This is not the Rolling Stones at all. You can tell from the vocals and the music. The drums sound nothing like Charlie Watts. If this was the Stones the guitars would be more distorted and the changes more smooth and longer. If this is a cover band they are not bad but not the Stones either.

[TheRiffslayer]

@Jag2danc i think so!, drums guitar and vovals are not Stones made!

[MrMelodynelson]

maybe a cover band of the Stones Band did it, (not the RST).

[SRQguy1]

sucks...not the Stones

[steveconn]

This ain't the stones.

[TigerIQ]

@oldTOtaper - Where did you find this? And who's that on vocals? It doesn't sound like Mick.

[CanucksSuck]

@TigerIQ I know, it's weird it doesn't sound like him but apparently it is. A friend gave sent me the album around 2007, I heard somewhere that it was on a Japanese release? I'm still not sure of the name though. When I got the album it was titled sweet neo con which was really odd. . .Hoping someone can clear this up

[mickj]

@CanucksSuck "apparently it is" who says?