Ground rules, of course, are that you would have a completely open mind --- like all "scientists" purportedly do, right? --- when confronted with new information AND quoting Herbert Spencer "no contempt prior to investigation" --- right? Unfortunately, you've already confessed on the second part. Give me an email address and I'll provide the data to you. Otherwise, best of luck.
Once again, I will offer to help out a naysayer. Would you care to see some evidence of the statistical validation or do you just want to cruise along uninformed?
Sure, please do, as I happen to be in Theoretical Physics (I deal with stastics all the time) this should be entertaining. I did look up some, god I cringe saying it, "Personology" and there is little use of the scientific method in any of their studies. There is some merit to what they're saying, but it is far, VERY far from being a science.
If you would like to acquire some background material and study the body of knowledge backing it up, I'd be more than happy to supply it. Otherwise, you've simply expressed an "uninformed" opinion. You might want to take me up on the offer and then make a comment.
Ground rules, of course, are that you would have a completely open mind --- like all "scientists" purportedly do, right? --- when confronted with new information AND quoting Herbert Spencer "no contempt prior to investigation" --- right? Unfortunately, you've already confessed on the second part. Give me an email address and I'll provide the data to you. Otherwise, best of luck.
billw1948 1 year ago
Oh pseudoscience, and I thought sociology was bad. This ranks right up there with reflexology.
Jim1905 1 year ago
Once again, I will offer to help out a naysayer. Would you care to see some evidence of the statistical validation or do you just want to cruise along uninformed?
billw1948 1 year ago
@billw1948
Sure, please do, as I happen to be in Theoretical Physics (I deal with stastics all the time) this should be entertaining. I did look up some, god I cringe saying it, "Personology" and there is little use of the scientific method in any of their studies. There is some merit to what they're saying, but it is far, VERY far from being a science.
Jim1905 1 year ago
Old and very dated.
christophercarlile 2 years ago
If you would like to acquire some background material and study the body of knowledge backing it up, I'd be more than happy to supply it. Otherwise, you've simply expressed an "uninformed" opinion. You might want to take me up on the offer and then make a comment.
billw1948 2 years ago