Added: 3 years ago
From: drab6969
Views: 23,572
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (84)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i mean ripped it

  • RANGERS SUCK!!!

    

  • ottawa sucks rangers won the pepole vote for ottawa sucks people vote for ottawa sucks

  • @DesiAunty101 shut up god damn it!!!!We know rangers won!!!!!we see in the damn video!!!But it's 2010 not 2008 and otttawa is better

  • @manrozgangster thats why ottawa was a 1st round exit and was 15th this yr

  • Ruutu is just a journeyman.. Little talent and a foot note at best in the NHL..

  • ahh...the good old days...when a shootout meant almost a certain win for the rangers

  • @NHLfreak87 your the retard if u think it would have counted

  • @RHEMMY25

    You are. NHL officialy annouced it would be a good goal if end up in the net. Don't call someone RETARD bc you are the one

  • @RHEMMY25 the nhl said it wouldve counted, you are the retard. "@TSNBobMcKenzie two years ago, regarding a shootout attempt in which Jarkko Ruuuto lost the puck and then got it back just before goal line and still shot: "The original loss of the puck was not on a shot. Therefore, the puck is live until it comes to a complete stop or the puck completely crosses the goal line."

  • How would Ruutu's not have counted? Retarded announcers?

  • lol 1:53 how G is lundqvist? just sticks the blocker right at the puck like "fuck you ruutu"

  • alex auld now plays for the rangers =o

    i miss Zherdev

    Drury is amazing tho great captain

  • KING HENRIK

  • KING HENRIK

  • 1:37 wow that is what i call a glove save :o

  • you're a stupid dick ya big fag go stick your dads ass

  • rutuu, what a dumb fuck...doesn't matter how many shots u take at lundqvist, you won't beat him.

  • better he is than u, u don't even deserve that nice name as a dumb fuck..

  • so u thought it was a good idea for him to shoot at lundqvist that late?

  • it was still going forward and it didn't stop, of course u should still try, who knows what hole puck finds..

  • definitely wouldn't have counted had it gone in...it was just about to cross the red line and he pulled it back

  • retard

  • great argument moron

  • Go Rangers!!!!! Texas that is jk, NEW YORK!!!

  • Look at the Zherdev what an Owner what a ruller.....!!! and they want to trade him omg

  • LETS GO RANGERS

  • the rangers fcking ownnnnn b*tchhhh

  • @LetsGoRangersxox Own at what exactly?

  • @87Bertha Lmao it was two years ago I have so many comment on videos that I don't even remember making bahaha embarrassing! But I couldn't tell you if I tried I have nooo idea what I was talking about. Although they do own at pretty much everything...(:

  • yo wumbo learn how to spell ... Canada sucks

  • this team is not involved in this but.......fuck the devils... LETS GO RANGERS!!!

  • Yep, they just won the game, that's all.

  • NY is fuckin beastly!! except the knicks, celtics kick ass!!

  • Haha Ruutu

  • how can spezza have reebok 10k stick last year there wasnt

  • this isnt from last year

    this is from this season

  • yea go11koivu we all carry weapons cuz we have to deal with people like you

  • For all of you who thinks he did NOT do wrong.. he did:

    Look at him closely what he is doing.. he doesn't just shot the puck, he stops it and gives it a better location for a better shot, which means that he actually backs up instead of going front.

  • Zherdev<3

  • by the way i noticed i spelled senators wrong im french but not on purpose so u crazy new yorkers dont gotta get up in my face yo and let the four five go. as i assume u all carry weapons.

  • fuck u french bitch im from new york

  • Well its true

  • this is really random but tell me if u agree.5 most popular teams in ottawa.senateurs habs leafs pens caps.

  • hahaha! SENS won 4-1 to against RANGERS yesterday!

  • Yes they did. An once again Ruutu proved what a gutless piece of shit he is. Colton Orr wanted to fight him and he wouldn't drop the gloves. The Senators were clearly going to win the game. That was a perfect time for both guys to fight and settle it. All you Ruutu fans talk about what a tough guy he is. It's obvious he is just a shit talking punk. Ruutu fans you have no excuses this time. But I'm sure you will post your typical bull shit.

  • In fact, I can see similarity with Alexei Kovalev in Nicolai Zherdev.

    Sherdev is going to be a big star in NHL hockey ! Belive you me !

    And Lundqvist is... Lundqvist (always there)!

  • What can I say. It would have counted. Absolutely nothing wrong in that play. It´s Lundqvists fault if he´s not ready.

  • Ruutu is the king

  • ruutu is a classless piece of shit

  • lol @ the second shot. Ruutu couldn't be serious with that one

  • Puck was moving, by the book gents!

  • Great victory for the Rangers. Henrik was AWESOME once again!

  • Jarkko Ruutu for the Lady Byng

  • I think some Ottawa fans are getting cranky because their team can't win a game and the Rangers are in first place.

  • henrik lundquist>ruutu

  • Ruutu is the best

  • Ruutu does what he suppost to do, you either love him or hate him. Great man, Ruutu rules!

  • Some people who can not play hockey complain too much.

    Theo > yritä olla mies äläkä neiti

  • yritä olla mies äläkä neiti???

  • Ruutu was playing by the rules, so what´s the problem? You think those guys would kill someone who play like that? Get real.

  • I still think it was cheap. He clearly missed on his attempt. The play was over. Kill someone for just that play? No. But just look at all the dirty and cheap hits he has given in his 8 plus years in the NHL. I dont think there is any player in the NHL today that plays as dirty and cheap as he does. As I stated in my first post I have no problem with players that play a tough and physical game. Ruutu is known for checking from behind and high shots to the head. That is not part of hockey.

  • Give me some facts you fucking idiot? :D Jarkko Ruutu its not "cheapshot artist", tell me examplesof those cheap shots.. You mayby say hit on Kovalchuck.. Kovalchuk is afraid and tries to jump away from Ruutu and gets hurt.. And hit on jagr is not cheap shot, head up.

  • You are calling me an idiot? LOL. How old are you? Judging by you're spelling and grammar, I would have to guess maybe 7 or 8 years old. Did you make it past the 5th grade? As for Ruutu's cheap shots: His elbow to Lapierre's head. His check from behind on Zubrus. His blindsided check on Jagr. His check from behind on Dubinsky last year. Just to name a few. It would take me years to list all of his cheap shots given during his 9 year career. Stay in school you fucking idiot.

  • you tell em =D

    jarkko ruutu is a douche. cant wait to see Orr and Dubie and Mara and Voros fuck him up this afternoon =]

    Jarkko Ruutu is like the Chris Simon from Finland =P

  • Theo814A, I think ur an idiot here. Who judges age by spelling english wrong? You know youtube is accessible outside america too, so tell me something in finnish smartass?

    Ruutu on Zubrus= normal check with leading elbow which is just for little push, you see it everyday by every player. Lapierre aint so clean himself so let them play amongst themselves. Dubi= Moved first other side and forgot puck so he had to turn back for it and boom, who gives a crap. :D

  • Yes youtube is accessible outside America. I did not know Gretzkyjr was from a foreign country. Ruutu on Zubrus: He lead with an elbow as you say it. No I don't see it every day by every player. You think elbowing is OK. Ruutu on Lapierre: Lapierre aint so clean as you say. You condone dirty and cheap play. Ruutu on Dubinsky: Ruutu had every chance to avoid Dubi. He choose to throw a cheap hit. The only idiots here are the ones who try to justify Ruutu's dirty and cheap play.

  • Well bottom line is that nhl let him still play. Means that its not cheap enough in professionals eyes to give him extra cake. He havent even hurt badly anyone. And oh yes elbows are everyday stuff, you come first with your shoulder then you straighten ur elbow to make longer push. Its not elbowing, elbowing is if u come with it first, like on Lapierre. My another fav plr is D.Brown, he elbows too? -Nope.

  • The fact that the NHL does let him get away with this nonsense is wrong. Just b/c he is not suspended does not mean his hits are clean. Again you are saying that elbowing is OK. Elbowing is elbowing. You can make up all the excuses you want. It is what is.

  • theo, you just don't get it, do you?

  • No I do not get it. Because I'm not a fan of dirty and cheap hockey.

  • my comment to this is that very often (as sum1 explained b4)when you hit someone, u contact with shoulder first, but in order to deliver the hit "thru" and keep ur balance also instead of "runnin over" you push the after the initial hit by extending your arms. that is not elbowing. elbowing needs a clear, direct impact. and i'm all against that also. BUT, sometimes accidents happen and guys get over heated. that's a shame cause it can result in serious and career ending injuries.

  • So what did he do wrong there? The puck was moving forward all the time. Learn the rules of the game and talk then, ok?

  • Take a better look before pretending to know something. Ruutu clearly dragged that puck backwards which would have resulted in an illegal goal. I think it's you who should learn the rules of the game.

  • Actually it would have counted if it went in since the puck never crossed the goal line and Ruutu missed the puck on the previous attempt to shoot it, Also he continued his forward motion. Don't get me wrong I hate Ruutu but surprisingly he didn't do anything wrong.

  • Nah, "nyrfan818". He did not drag the puck backwards. Sorry. Try and learn from your rookie mistake or have your eyes checked.

  • So the puck goes from nearly touching the goalline, to a semi-shootable angle? Please. I'm not saying he moved it back a couple of feet, but he clearly moved it backwards a bit and thus, it would not have counted.

  • Then by your definition, Ribeiro's goal last week, the many spinnerama goals, and a countless number of other shootout goals should not have counted? The puck never stopped and it didn't cross the goal line. He didn't stop and bring it back out front for a shot, it continued its forward motion and it would have counted had it gone in.

  • Any of those goals where the puck did not continue moving forward (excluding spin-o-rama's which have their own seperate clause in the rules) should not have counted. I'm sorry, but we'll have to agree to disagree. I see the puck clearly moving back a bit, and you don't. It's just a matter of what each person sees. We can at least agree that we all know the rules - it's just a matter of visual interpretation.

  • We can agree to disagree, but by standards of the immediate completion of a shot, it was a live puck since it did not stop or cross the goal line. The forward motion bit is always debatable. I think the NHL needs to change the language concerning forward motion, personally. Make it more of a focus on continuous motion, like with the spin-o-rama.

  • Some goals that would be disallowed by your logic of moving it "back a bit"... won't let me post links, but Zetterberg's "Forsberg" move, Getzlaf's drag move, Gagner's move, Datsyuk's drag move on Vokoun, and Malik's between the legs goal... ranked 12, 7, 5, 3, 1 on a top 15 shootout goals reel.

    Obviously there is a lot of flexibility on the "forward motion" topic, and I don't think you can say for sure that Ruutu's shot would not have counted.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more