@RHEMMY25 the nhl said it wouldve counted, you are the retard. "@TSNBobMcKenzie two years ago, regarding a shootout attempt in which Jarkko Ruuuto lost the puck and then got it back just before goal line and still shot: "The original loss of the puck was not on a shot. Therefore, the puck is live until it comes to a complete stop or the puck completely crosses the goal line."
@87Bertha Lmao it was two years ago I have so many comment on videos that I don't even remember making bahaha embarrassing! But I couldn't tell you if I tried I have nooo idea what I was talking about. Although they do own at pretty much everything...(:
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ruutuu is a scumbag. I apologize to scumbags.
Why does Avery get in so much trouble in this league and he never hurt anybody, but Ruutu can go around hurting people and Bettman doesn't threaten his livelihood like he did to Avery. I don't get it. Ruutu's been doing this crap for years.
For all of you who thinks he did NOT do wrong.. he did:
Look at him closely what he is doing.. he doesn't just shot the puck, he stops it and gives it a better location for a better shot, which means that he actually backs up instead of going front.
by the way i noticed i spelled senators wrong im french but not on purpose so u crazy new yorkers dont gotta get up in my face yo and let the four five go. as i assume u all carry weapons.
Yes they did. An once again Ruutu proved what a gutless piece of shit he is. Colton Orr wanted to fight him and he wouldn't drop the gloves. The Senators were clearly going to win the game. That was a perfect time for both guys to fight and settle it. All you Ruutu fans talk about what a tough guy he is. It's obvious he is just a shit talking punk. Ruutu fans you have no excuses this time. But I'm sure you will post your typical bull shit.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Jarkko Ruutu is such a piece of shit and an insult to the NHL. I'm all for hard hitting and toughness. But you have to show respect. This asshole has no respect for other players. I wish he played in the NHL 15-20 years ago. Guys like Probert, Kocur, Grimson, Crowder, Daneyko, Graves, and Ray (just to name a few) would have gave that punk a few lessons in playing tough but at the same time having respect.
I still think it was cheap. He clearly missed on his attempt. The play was over. Kill someone for just that play? No. But just look at all the dirty and cheap hits he has given in his 8 plus years in the NHL. I dont think there is any player in the NHL today that plays as dirty and cheap as he does. As I stated in my first post I have no problem with players that play a tough and physical game. Ruutu is known for checking from behind and high shots to the head. That is not part of hockey.
Give me some facts you fucking idiot? :D Jarkko Ruutu its not "cheapshot artist", tell me examplesof those cheap shots.. You mayby say hit on Kovalchuck.. Kovalchuk is afraid and tries to jump away from Ruutu and gets hurt.. And hit on jagr is not cheap shot, head up.
You are calling me an idiot? LOL. How old are you? Judging by you're spelling and grammar, I would have to guess maybe 7 or 8 years old. Did you make it past the 5th grade? As for Ruutu's cheap shots: His elbow to Lapierre's head. His check from behind on Zubrus. His blindsided check on Jagr. His check from behind on Dubinsky last year. Just to name a few. It would take me years to list all of his cheap shots given during his 9 year career. Stay in school you fucking idiot.
Theo814A, I think ur an idiot here. Who judges age by spelling english wrong? You know youtube is accessible outside america too, so tell me something in finnish smartass?
Ruutu on Zubrus= normal check with leading elbow which is just for little push, you see it everyday by every player. Lapierre aint so clean himself so let them play amongst themselves. Dubi= Moved first other side and forgot puck so he had to turn back for it and boom, who gives a crap. :D
Yes youtube is accessible outside America. I did not know Gretzkyjr was from a foreign country. Ruutu on Zubrus: He lead with an elbow as you say it. No I don't see it every day by every player. You think elbowing is OK. Ruutu on Lapierre: Lapierre aint so clean as you say. You condone dirty and cheap play. Ruutu on Dubinsky: Ruutu had every chance to avoid Dubi. He choose to throw a cheap hit. The only idiots here are the ones who try to justify Ruutu's dirty and cheap play.
Well bottom line is that nhl let him still play. Means that its not cheap enough in professionals eyes to give him extra cake. He havent even hurt badly anyone. And oh yes elbows are everyday stuff, you come first with your shoulder then you straighten ur elbow to make longer push. Its not elbowing, elbowing is if u come with it first, like on Lapierre. My another fav plr is D.Brown, he elbows too? -Nope.
The fact that the NHL does let him get away with this nonsense is wrong. Just b/c he is not suspended does not mean his hits are clean. Again you are saying that elbowing is OK. Elbowing is elbowing. You can make up all the excuses you want. It is what is.
my comment to this is that very often (as sum1 explained b4)when you hit someone, u contact with shoulder first, but in order to deliver the hit "thru" and keep ur balance also instead of "runnin over" you push the after the initial hit by extending your arms. that is not elbowing. elbowing needs a clear, direct impact. and i'm all against that also. BUT, sometimes accidents happen and guys get over heated. that's a shame cause it can result in serious and career ending injuries.
Take a better look before pretending to know something. Ruutu clearly dragged that puck backwards which would have resulted in an illegal goal. I think it's you who should learn the rules of the game.
Actually it would have counted if it went in since the puck never crossed the goal line and Ruutu missed the puck on the previous attempt to shoot it, Also he continued his forward motion. Don't get me wrong I hate Ruutu but surprisingly he didn't do anything wrong.
So the puck goes from nearly touching the goalline, to a semi-shootable angle? Please. I'm not saying he moved it back a couple of feet, but he clearly moved it backwards a bit and thus, it would not have counted.
Then by your definition, Ribeiro's goal last week, the many spinnerama goals, and a countless number of other shootout goals should not have counted? The puck never stopped and it didn't cross the goal line. He didn't stop and bring it back out front for a shot, it continued its forward motion and it would have counted had it gone in.
Any of those goals where the puck did not continue moving forward (excluding spin-o-rama's which have their own seperate clause in the rules) should not have counted. I'm sorry, but we'll have to agree to disagree. I see the puck clearly moving back a bit, and you don't. It's just a matter of what each person sees. We can at least agree that we all know the rules - it's just a matter of visual interpretation.
We can agree to disagree, but by standards of the immediate completion of a shot, it was a live puck since it did not stop or cross the goal line. The forward motion bit is always debatable. I think the NHL needs to change the language concerning forward motion, personally. Make it more of a focus on continuous motion, like with the spin-o-rama.
Some goals that would be disallowed by your logic of moving it "back a bit"... won't let me post links, but Zetterberg's "Forsberg" move, Getzlaf's drag move, Gagner's move, Datsyuk's drag move on Vokoun, and Malik's between the legs goal... ranked 12, 7, 5, 3, 1 on a top 15 shootout goals reel.
Obviously there is a lot of flexibility on the "forward motion" topic, and I don't think you can say for sure that Ruutu's shot would not have counted.
i mean ripped it
ttttcool 3 months ago
RANGERS SUCK!!!
kldevils11 5 months ago
ottawa sucks rangers won the pepole vote for ottawa sucks people vote for ottawa sucks
DesiAunty101 1 year ago
@DesiAunty101 shut up god damn it!!!!We know rangers won!!!!!we see in the damn video!!!But it's 2010 not 2008 and otttawa is better
manrozgangster 1 year ago
@manrozgangster thats why ottawa was a 1st round exit and was 15th this yr
PossessedDonutz 8 months ago
Ruutu is just a journeyman.. Little talent and a foot note at best in the NHL..
RockLives4u 1 year ago
ahh...the good old days...when a shootout meant almost a certain win for the rangers
prid92 1 year ago
@NHLfreak87 your the retard if u think it would have counted
RHEMMY25 1 year ago
@RHEMMY25
You are. NHL officialy annouced it would be a good goal if end up in the net. Don't call someone RETARD bc you are the one
tristo1963 1 year ago
@RHEMMY25 the nhl said it wouldve counted, you are the retard. "@TSNBobMcKenzie two years ago, regarding a shootout attempt in which Jarkko Ruuuto lost the puck and then got it back just before goal line and still shot: "The original loss of the puck was not on a shot. Therefore, the puck is live until it comes to a complete stop or the puck completely crosses the goal line."
psuscott0483 1 year ago
How would Ruutu's not have counted? Retarded announcers?
NHLfreak87 1 year ago
lol 1:53 how G is lundqvist? just sticks the blocker right at the puck like "fuck you ruutu"
ColtonORRules 1 year ago
alex auld now plays for the rangers =o
i miss Zherdev
Drury is amazing tho great captain
Ironknite9 1 year ago
KING HENRIK
ACE101896 1 year ago
KING HENRIK
ACE101896 1 year ago
1:37 wow that is what i call a glove save :o
pontuskevin1337 1 year ago
you're a stupid dick ya big fag go stick your dads ass
astermartin 2 years ago
rutuu, what a dumb fuck...doesn't matter how many shots u take at lundqvist, you won't beat him.
TriFF51 2 years ago
better he is than u, u don't even deserve that nice name as a dumb fuck..
umpisuoli87 2 years ago
so u thought it was a good idea for him to shoot at lundqvist that late?
TriFF51 2 years ago
it was still going forward and it didn't stop, of course u should still try, who knows what hole puck finds..
umpisuoli87 2 years ago
definitely wouldn't have counted had it gone in...it was just about to cross the red line and he pulled it back
TriFF51 2 years ago
retard
yowristband 2 years ago
great argument moron
TriFF51 2 years ago
Go Rangers!!!!! Texas that is jk, NEW YORK!!!
Redsfancoop 2 years ago
Look at the Zherdev what an Owner what a ruller.....!!! and they want to trade him omg
ghost111uin 2 years ago
LETS GO RANGERS
HARRYLEGZ10 2 years ago
the rangers fcking ownnnnn b*tchhhh
LetsGoRangersxox 2 years ago 6
@LetsGoRangersxox Own at what exactly?
87Bertha 3 weeks ago
@87Bertha Lmao it was two years ago I have so many comment on videos that I don't even remember making bahaha embarrassing! But I couldn't tell you if I tried I have nooo idea what I was talking about. Although they do own at pretty much everything...(:
LetsGoRangersxox 3 days ago
yo wumbo learn how to spell ... Canada sucks
Randomhero2727 2 years ago
this team is not involved in this but.......fuck the devils... LETS GO RANGERS!!!
nickyx26 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
wumbo09 3 years ago
Yep, they just won the game, that's all.
OvEcHkInG2831 3 years ago
NY is fuckin beastly!! except the knicks, celtics kick ass!!
celtics4ever34 2 years ago
Haha Ruutu
arioz1 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ruutuu is a scumbag. I apologize to scumbags.
Why does Avery get in so much trouble in this league and he never hurt anybody, but Ruutu can go around hurting people and Bettman doesn't threaten his livelihood like he did to Avery. I don't get it. Ruutu's been doing this crap for years.
snowcloud 3 years ago
how can spezza have reebok 10k stick last year there wasnt
hunhockey22 3 years ago
this isnt from last year
this is from this season
cornboy111 2 years ago 2
yea go11koivu we all carry weapons cuz we have to deal with people like you
LSZooski 3 years ago
For all of you who thinks he did NOT do wrong.. he did:
Look at him closely what he is doing.. he doesn't just shot the puck, he stops it and gives it a better location for a better shot, which means that he actually backs up instead of going front.
J0113 3 years ago
Zherdev<3
jjereee 3 years ago
by the way i noticed i spelled senators wrong im french but not on purpose so u crazy new yorkers dont gotta get up in my face yo and let the four five go. as i assume u all carry weapons.
go11koivu 3 years ago
fuck u french bitch im from new york
Raymondbeacon1 3 years ago
Well its true
go11koivu 3 years ago
this is really random but tell me if u agree.5 most popular teams in ottawa.senateurs habs leafs pens caps.
go11koivu 3 years ago
hahaha! SENS won 4-1 to against RANGERS yesterday!
phoemae101 3 years ago
Yes they did. An once again Ruutu proved what a gutless piece of shit he is. Colton Orr wanted to fight him and he wouldn't drop the gloves. The Senators were clearly going to win the game. That was a perfect time for both guys to fight and settle it. All you Ruutu fans talk about what a tough guy he is. It's obvious he is just a shit talking punk. Ruutu fans you have no excuses this time. But I'm sure you will post your typical bull shit.
Theo814A 3 years ago
In fact, I can see similarity with Alexei Kovalev in Nicolai Zherdev.
Sherdev is going to be a big star in NHL hockey ! Belive you me !
And Lundqvist is... Lundqvist (always there)!
forthekingandglory 3 years ago
What can I say. It would have counted. Absolutely nothing wrong in that play. It´s Lundqvists fault if he´s not ready.
orvivee 3 years ago 3
Ruutu is the king
Diimagnet 3 years ago
ruutu is a classless piece of shit
xCAGx77 3 years ago
lol @ the second shot. Ruutu couldn't be serious with that one
markmessier94 3 years ago
Puck was moving, by the book gents!
AVOTieto 3 years ago
Great victory for the Rangers. Henrik was AWESOME once again!
niceguy33 3 years ago
Jarkko Ruutu for the Lady Byng
longerthanaweek 3 years ago
I think some Ottawa fans are getting cranky because their team can't win a game and the Rangers are in first place.
abarkume 3 years ago
henrik lundquist>ruutu
caffeinemetal 3 years ago
Ruutu is the best
heiggi112 3 years ago 5
Ruutu does what he suppost to do, you either love him or hate him. Great man, Ruutu rules!
GretzkyJr 3 years ago 10
Some people who can not play hockey complain too much.
Theo > yritä olla mies äläkä neiti
vilppulankarhu 3 years ago 9
yritä olla mies äläkä neiti???
Theo814A 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Jarkko Ruutu is such a piece of shit and an insult to the NHL. I'm all for hard hitting and toughness. But you have to show respect. This asshole has no respect for other players. I wish he played in the NHL 15-20 years ago. Guys like Probert, Kocur, Grimson, Crowder, Daneyko, Graves, and Ray (just to name a few) would have gave that punk a few lessons in playing tough but at the same time having respect.
Theo814A 3 years ago
Ruutu was playing by the rules, so what´s the problem? You think those guys would kill someone who play like that? Get real.
megavakmy 3 years ago 3
I still think it was cheap. He clearly missed on his attempt. The play was over. Kill someone for just that play? No. But just look at all the dirty and cheap hits he has given in his 8 plus years in the NHL. I dont think there is any player in the NHL today that plays as dirty and cheap as he does. As I stated in my first post I have no problem with players that play a tough and physical game. Ruutu is known for checking from behind and high shots to the head. That is not part of hockey.
Theo814A 3 years ago
Give me some facts you fucking idiot? :D Jarkko Ruutu its not "cheapshot artist", tell me examplesof those cheap shots.. You mayby say hit on Kovalchuck.. Kovalchuk is afraid and tries to jump away from Ruutu and gets hurt.. And hit on jagr is not cheap shot, head up.
GretzkyJr 3 years ago
You are calling me an idiot? LOL. How old are you? Judging by you're spelling and grammar, I would have to guess maybe 7 or 8 years old. Did you make it past the 5th grade? As for Ruutu's cheap shots: His elbow to Lapierre's head. His check from behind on Zubrus. His blindsided check on Jagr. His check from behind on Dubinsky last year. Just to name a few. It would take me years to list all of his cheap shots given during his 9 year career. Stay in school you fucking idiot.
Theo814A 3 years ago
you tell em =D
jarkko ruutu is a douche. cant wait to see Orr and Dubie and Mara and Voros fuck him up this afternoon =]
Jarkko Ruutu is like the Chris Simon from Finland =P
cornboy111 3 years ago
Theo814A, I think ur an idiot here. Who judges age by spelling english wrong? You know youtube is accessible outside america too, so tell me something in finnish smartass?
Ruutu on Zubrus= normal check with leading elbow which is just for little push, you see it everyday by every player. Lapierre aint so clean himself so let them play amongst themselves. Dubi= Moved first other side and forgot puck so he had to turn back for it and boom, who gives a crap. :D
ekiboy 3 years ago
Yes youtube is accessible outside America. I did not know Gretzkyjr was from a foreign country. Ruutu on Zubrus: He lead with an elbow as you say it. No I don't see it every day by every player. You think elbowing is OK. Ruutu on Lapierre: Lapierre aint so clean as you say. You condone dirty and cheap play. Ruutu on Dubinsky: Ruutu had every chance to avoid Dubi. He choose to throw a cheap hit. The only idiots here are the ones who try to justify Ruutu's dirty and cheap play.
Theo814A 3 years ago
Well bottom line is that nhl let him still play. Means that its not cheap enough in professionals eyes to give him extra cake. He havent even hurt badly anyone. And oh yes elbows are everyday stuff, you come first with your shoulder then you straighten ur elbow to make longer push. Its not elbowing, elbowing is if u come with it first, like on Lapierre. My another fav plr is D.Brown, he elbows too? -Nope.
ekiboy 3 years ago
The fact that the NHL does let him get away with this nonsense is wrong. Just b/c he is not suspended does not mean his hits are clean. Again you are saying that elbowing is OK. Elbowing is elbowing. You can make up all the excuses you want. It is what is.
Theo814A 3 years ago
theo, you just don't get it, do you?
sanukh 3 years ago
No I do not get it. Because I'm not a fan of dirty and cheap hockey.
Theo814A 3 years ago
my comment to this is that very often (as sum1 explained b4)when you hit someone, u contact with shoulder first, but in order to deliver the hit "thru" and keep ur balance also instead of "runnin over" you push the after the initial hit by extending your arms. that is not elbowing. elbowing needs a clear, direct impact. and i'm all against that also. BUT, sometimes accidents happen and guys get over heated. that's a shame cause it can result in serious and career ending injuries.
sanukh 3 years ago
So what did he do wrong there? The puck was moving forward all the time. Learn the rules of the game and talk then, ok?
stunttis 3 years ago 3
Take a better look before pretending to know something. Ruutu clearly dragged that puck backwards which would have resulted in an illegal goal. I think it's you who should learn the rules of the game.
nyrfan818 3 years ago
Actually it would have counted if it went in since the puck never crossed the goal line and Ruutu missed the puck on the previous attempt to shoot it, Also he continued his forward motion. Don't get me wrong I hate Ruutu but surprisingly he didn't do anything wrong.
Cappy14 3 years ago 2
Nah, "nyrfan818". He did not drag the puck backwards. Sorry. Try and learn from your rookie mistake or have your eyes checked.
stunttis 3 years ago
So the puck goes from nearly touching the goalline, to a semi-shootable angle? Please. I'm not saying he moved it back a couple of feet, but he clearly moved it backwards a bit and thus, it would not have counted.
nyrfan818 3 years ago
Then by your definition, Ribeiro's goal last week, the many spinnerama goals, and a countless number of other shootout goals should not have counted? The puck never stopped and it didn't cross the goal line. He didn't stop and bring it back out front for a shot, it continued its forward motion and it would have counted had it gone in.
CM17 3 years ago
Any of those goals where the puck did not continue moving forward (excluding spin-o-rama's which have their own seperate clause in the rules) should not have counted. I'm sorry, but we'll have to agree to disagree. I see the puck clearly moving back a bit, and you don't. It's just a matter of what each person sees. We can at least agree that we all know the rules - it's just a matter of visual interpretation.
nyrfan818 3 years ago
We can agree to disagree, but by standards of the immediate completion of a shot, it was a live puck since it did not stop or cross the goal line. The forward motion bit is always debatable. I think the NHL needs to change the language concerning forward motion, personally. Make it more of a focus on continuous motion, like with the spin-o-rama.
CM17 3 years ago
Some goals that would be disallowed by your logic of moving it "back a bit"... won't let me post links, but Zetterberg's "Forsberg" move, Getzlaf's drag move, Gagner's move, Datsyuk's drag move on Vokoun, and Malik's between the legs goal... ranked 12, 7, 5, 3, 1 on a top 15 shootout goals reel.
Obviously there is a lot of flexibility on the "forward motion" topic, and I don't think you can say for sure that Ruutu's shot would not have counted.
CM17 3 years ago