A force sets an object in motion. That object travels at a speed relative to its mass in relation to that force. So, technically, if the force is great enough and the object maintains momentum, it is possible that this object could pass another object traveling at 186,282 miles per second (the speed of light). An object traveling that fast would certainly have trouble supporting its own mass. It would be very dense and possibly smaller than any known particle we've ever seen.
John Mather the sexmachine!
kribbman 2 weeks ago
A force sets an object in motion. That object travels at a speed relative to its mass in relation to that force. So, technically, if the force is great enough and the object maintains momentum, it is possible that this object could pass another object traveling at 186,282 miles per second (the speed of light). An object traveling that fast would certainly have trouble supporting its own mass. It would be very dense and possibly smaller than any known particle we've ever seen.
flyingsoundmachine 3 weeks ago
and they move faster than the speed of light! scientists going ape-shit man!!!!
firefrostpeacemaker 3 weeks ago
is he human
LeWydadi 4 weeks ago
Yet they are faster than light! Discuss it among yourselves!
slonamu 4 weeks ago
So - SOMEONE HAS TO BE wrong: Either Einstein, or CERN or he.
Or maybe nature just has't learned to adapt to our theories yet ?
Yeh. I suppose that this is the answer.
shady
shadybinoculars 1 month ago
So neutrinos have a half life?
BlitzNeko 1 month ago
G man -Black mesa-
shroomze 2 months ago
I dont take "we are PRETTY sure"for an answer...hah
kloklo12389 2 months ago
@kloklo12389 I agree. It's not a very scientific answer at all.
666LordAlucard 2 months ago
The fundamental reason that LIGHT can travel at the Universe's maximum speed limit (ie "c") is that photons are massless.
A recent claim has been made that nutrinos can travel up to 20 ppm faster than the speed of light.
How can nutornoes acheive this when their rest mass is agreed to be non-zero?
Alchaeon1 3 months ago
@Alchaeon1 e =/ mc^2 anymore, thats how!
blakenator123 2 months ago
@blakenator123 @Alchaeon1 One answer is that the neutrino's get there through the 5th dimension- tunneling.
RadicalMonotheist 2 months ago
@RadicalMonotheist At this moment in science nothing can be ruled out!
blakenator123 2 months ago
@Alchaeon1 Maybe it was an adolescent nuetrino just being rebellious.
dzsquared1 1 month ago
@Alchaeon1 "How can nutornoes acheive this when their rest mass is agreed to be non-zero?"
Their rest mass is non-zero? Then maybe you can't slow down neutrinos less than or equal to the speed of light?
technatezin 1 month ago
play him off....keyboard cat
nofatchxplzthx 3 months ago
maybe space and time inside the LHC collider aint the same as in reality and in the Universe.
so maybe the magnetic field inside the LHC was responsible for creating a small time increase.
which is impossiible in the universe, because the magnetic fields in the Universe are in all directions .
ImmortalUniverse 3 months ago
0:33 where did he come from?
boogiebuddy01 3 months ago 9
Comment removed
boogiebuddy01 3 months ago
Comment removed
boogiebuddy01 3 months ago
Comment removed
boogiebuddy01 3 months ago
Comment removed
boogiebuddy01 3 months ago
well ive learnt something today. now back to porn
sniktun 3 months ago 34
@sniktun amen
death5409 2 months ago
@sniktun
back to porn?
i was watching porn at the same time...it's all about efficiency my man
ricodelta1 1 month ago
ther's no nothing ..
theramoz1 3 months ago
The neutrino problem was solved eight years ago according to Wikipedia... nonetheless, good video!
Territomauvais 1 year ago
are they so sure that neutrinos are particles and not a misinterpretation of what they really observe?
carusggg 2 years ago
@carusggg well we can actually detect them these days.
djpob 9 months ago