Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i have no clue what he was talking about :D go dodgers

  • nancy desn't need to testify... she needs to be arrested.

  • Ensign is prolly going down for ethics violations after todays news.

    Another affair paid for by you and me prolly.

  • Franklin Roosevelt 19331945 had 19

    George W. Bush20012009 had46

    Barack Obama2009 has35

    Bush had more!!!....where was the outrage then!?!?!?!

  • missing the whole damn point... then again everything's just black and white to the obama supporter.

  • Then whats the point....thats my question. Or are you entirely obtuse on the matter? No outrage then but outrage now. Tell me the difference, or are you going to go with the entire expand government crap...give me a break. Fact is other presidents had more czars than Obama. So please just explain your position.

  • do me a favor and don't use big words you don't understand. first of all... he's putting more amore non-elected czars in power every day. and this is proof... that you don't know what you're talking about... because people like ensign and voters like me have voiced concerns over these issues for years. and you don't care about gov't expansion because you need it to survive.

  • Wow...I didn't realize having a college education and actually understanding the English language was a crime. So lets see...I need government to survive...hmmm well your just plain wrong there. No one needs government to survive but a society needs governance to to thrive. Now go back and read that a few more times since I know you didn't comprehend there ever being a difference.

  • i love it when libs insult people.. they always attack the i.q...funny considering you all the the most ignorant of the voting public... and that's a fact..look up the golden boy 44's key demographics and you'll see. and as for the college thing... i'm sure you know how you got that..not going there...and yes libs do need gov't..big gov't... they have no control so they turn to the tax payer...you know what a tax payer's, don't you. i hate you, and it's fun!!!!!!! noone needs gov't.......lmao!!!

  • lmao!!! wow...you know whats really funny!? You talk about I.Q. and can't form a proper sentence!! Also if you would have read it again (like I told you the first time) you would have seen the difference in the two words. GOVERNMENT AND GOVERNANCE ARE 2 DIFFERENT WORDS!!!! So like I said the first time. Read it again. Also even Bill O'reilly said and I quote "the health care system need government regulation, but not management.

  • this is youtube!!!! who the fuck cares about proper sentences??!!!! thanks to obama and you ignorant voters... we have both.. and they are both done badly!!! these two words go hand in hand... obama's shitty leadership means shitty governance... they need not govern anything.... and you need to lighten up... who died and made you the web's proper language police?? again.. i love hating you... it brightnens my day.

  • WOW...it's no wonder you seem so screwy. It's people that love to hate that have preposterous ideas about what everybody else should do. I hope you remain happy everyday, all I can do is pity you. Hate gets you nowhere.

  • There is a difference between regulation and management as there is also a difference between government and governance. FYI he was talking to Glenn Beck when he said this. Learn some vocabulary befor you start spewing off about nothing. ;)

  • then you might want to tell your president...

  • Ensign makes a good closing remark. What this "fight" is about is the seperation of powers. Yes, there have been Czars on both sides of the isle since the coining of the term during the Eisenhower years, as there has been 5 democratic and 5 republican administrations so its a draw

    The point is: All the people entrusted with the welfare of the american people are screened to a certain degree. Congressman have to be elected and cabinet members have to be vetted.

    Czars are simply assigned

  • this just shows one more reason why the government has NO business in our private sector. if we have to have 18 new people established as czars that report to no one but the POTUS and they have no one to answer to in Congress and the people. ugh i can't believe people don't get it.

  • Ensign is right .. Bush didnt have czars .. all of his cabinet members were accountable.. not Obama's

  • The term goes back at least as far as 1957, when James Killian was called the "Missile Czar" by the press in the aftermath of Sputnik.

    During the 1970s oil crisis, Frank Zarb was known as the energy czar under President Ford.

    President George H.W. Bush appointed William J. Bennett as the nation's first drug czar in 1989.

    The second Bush administration also had numerous intelligence and homeland security czars.

    Obama has 18 czars. George W. Bush had 44 czars in his administration.

  • when are you going to get it? it doesn't matter who had czars - they're wrong to have.

  • Yeah, they're wrong, and the FED is wrong, the income tax is wrong, subsidizing big insurance, bug pharma, and big farms is wrong. The list goes on and on. We're all fucked. This country is fucked.

  • why do you all have different numbers of czars for different presidents? and in all actuallity obama as over 30... depending on how you use the word. phonetics is important in D.C. ..........

  • Really?

  • what a hypocritical moron.... where were these 'czarheads' when bush/cheney were in office??? there's a special place in dante's inferno version of HELL for hypocritical liars -- and ensign is one of 'em....

  • These czars yak to the President. And have little power. There only power is oversight to whatever bureaucracy they have been assigned to. Glenn Beck and these Republicans found a talking point, that is all.

  • ITS SO SAD THAT YOU PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE ENSIGN IS FILIBUSTERING.

    kill yourself

  • Comment removed

  • the power goes toward the person ppl voted for, & his just sounds like a cry baby, cause his side lost big time.

  • John Ensign is RIGHT !!! WTF that other guy is an RETARD

  • Sen. Ensign argues for the need of constant conflict and the balance of Power, thereby maintaining transparency. He bases his argument on the will of our founding fathers. He never suggested this arguments during the Bush administration.

    The mind struggles under the task of evaluation, but ultimately, it must step clear of the task and achieve it, rather than ponder it. Doctors might call this "psychotic mental apraxia". We achieve such a balanced we can't act at all.

    Sound familiar?

  • he admitted that it should have been done a long time ago.

  • This guy has been watching too much Glenn Beck.

  • Let them have it John!

    You rock!

  • Ensign...Ensign, isn't he that one senator who did it with his campaign worker's wife, then paid the husband off?

  • Hmm... mmm... why, yes; yes indeed, he is, in fact the same. (By now he should be Senator Lieutenant Junior Grade. WFT?)

  • Ensign needs a Penis Czar.

  • Ensign's mom and dad paid off his mistress and her family to keep his adulterous affair secret.

    He's a dumb momma's boy who never learned to control his own behavior.

    Therefore I don't listen to him.

  • Typical Obamabot, attack the messenger.

  • Of course! All sides do it, because it works. Also, what I said is true.

    The whole "czar" thing is a silly non-issue anyway. Ooh, the Pres appoints advisers and project leaders within his administration, just like any leader does. What a scandal. Time to man the barricades.

  • I don't get it...Obama has 1 more Czar than Bush tinyurl (com)/ksv8hv

  • Hey clown remember Bush & his 45 czars???

  • Czars have no power. At all.  Whatsoever. They are advisers. Ministers have power, advisers don't.

  • funny huh, where was he during Bush administration.

  • Where was he for Karl Rove for that matter.

  • Was that senator Jay Rockefeller laughing during this debate seated next to the chairman?

  • The second assistant chief telephone operator WILL be subject to Senate confirmation; but, the third assistant chief telephone operator WON'T.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more