Added: 3 years ago
From: powerrabbit2339
Views: 81,033
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • to anyone who says your adding electricity to water to make electicity and that won't work... your right. your adding electricity to HARVEST the hydrogen that dwells in water.. now that hydrogen is alot more flammable than water, and hence is now USEFUL in combustion engines. No laws of thermal dynamics have been breached. we just got our combustable resource in a more convenient form now

  • not if you can get the water to chain react itself

  • this is about efficiency Corporations like producing power at the plants sweet spot, ta oxygen can be stored, sold, or used to increase combustion efficacy. ta hydrogen can be stored, and used to power gas turbine generators during peak electrical demand. a more efficient power plant is a cleaner power plant. this can be applied to any power plant. not as green as Chinese solar panels shipped across the ocean,built in Chinese green factories, with no pollution carried on the jetstream ot the us

  • The sun is the answer. When we go the sun has gone as well.

  • REAL Free energy technology exists!But the coverup is very strong,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!

  • so here is how you do it. wind power and solar power to break water into HHO. vent off the O2 and store the Hydrogen using lithium-6 or you can use low pressure storage in propane tanks. then when you need electricity, use a hydrogen fuel sell battery to combined hydrogen and O2 back together. simple.

  • You can jack up the conversion rate to almost 100% but never and never over. You can do this by pulsing the current going into the hho cell. Now free energy is energy absorbed from nature, ie solar panels, heat pump panels which use water for heating water purposes or freon for generating heat or mechanical movement.

  • Very good work i realy like your videos

    It would be a massive pollution improvement if we can convert propane or natural gas appliance I like this video

    __(Heating Water With HHO Hydroxy Hydrogen Part 1 of 2 from HHOG Labs)----

  • what software you have to make these videos?

  • Got bad Ideas? I'll put this one next to the PPM machines.

    and for the record, if your really wanted to write it out, it would be HOH, not HHO.

  • that s exactly how uranium is used to make steam

  • Whoever believes in this is a moron. This is the law of diminishing return. Using electricity to produce less efficient electricity.

  • @Slimstile Yea but its fun to see people come out with this great new idea, yet when you search for there videos there are at least a million more just like it and they are years old. I find stupidity rather entertaining.

  • @Slimstile Hey what if the water is split by wind and solar, both of which are abundant and free? this is proven technology right here, electrolosis.

  • @Slimstile so by your law we spend more energy to crank and ignite petrol in a generator than the energy it produces?

  • @Nismoke It’s not my law. It’s the law of physics. Petrol is stored solar energy water is not a combustible form of energy. You get more out of each piston explosion then the friction and cranking losses in the engine. If you didn’t then the engine would not run. This video is trying to use energy to make more energy then what it started with. Hope that clears it up.

  • @Slimstile yes but water is an energy source too.under the right frequency it merges into oxygen and hydrogen like any other material.its not about spending energy to make water combustible but rather separate it.most ways shown on the internet on how to do that are wrong.they spend more than they get because they use a random voltage and amps..but under the right frequency you spend less energy to separate it.

  • @Nismoke your right. There are litterally thousands (if not more) configurations. Finding the right one is key.

    I think cold fusion is in the right direction. I also know magnetism helps a lot! Sunlight? Static, Gravity all may play a part. Electrolyte? Woaaaah many combinations to tweak.

  • This has been done, I have seen it. Take a look a this guy on Utube (POWERUPSOON) he has done something like this. It work and he makes lots of power.

  • @dbi1036 Bullshit

  • @Vennificus It's like he's trying to sell people a goose that lays golden eggs but he's not telling them you have to feed the goose three golden eggs for each egg it lays. :)

  • there is no sound

  • god damn it i thought it would be those electrosys thing

  • Yes, I was a nuclear technician in the Navy. I know the difference between a nuclear reaction and a chemical reaction. There is tremendous power released when the nucleus of a heavy radioactive material fissions. There is no chemical energy stored in a water molecule. It's in a stable state. You have to add energy to it to break the chemical bonds between O2 and H2. You simply get that energy back when you burn them minus considerable energy lost because the conversion isn't efficient.

  • @AnarchyInYourHead Be careful with your usage of chemical energy, it is always relative to something else. If I add pure sodium to water, ill show you its energy (difference).

  • @AnarchyInYourHead This may be a dumb question but I have to ask. Can you break a hydrogen bond with radiation? and if so how high would the levels have to be?

  • @adamslurch71 I think it's been done actually. It certainly seems theoretically possible. I don't know the exact levels you'd need though it would certainly be more than the energy you'd get out of burning the resulting H2 and O2. The potential energy released by burning the O2 and H2 would have to be overcome by the radiation and then some extra due to inefficiency.

  • @adamslurch71 It's probably a fun science experiment but not very useful. Electrolysis is probably far more energy efficient and it conveniently separates the H2 and O2, making it useful for storing energy. I'm not sure how you'd separate the gases after radiation. If I recall, they were burning it immediately which kind of defeats the point. It's just converting radiation directly into flame and wasting a lot of energy in the process.

  • @AnarchyInYourHead I was wondering b/c there are by products that we have that are radioactive, think if we could put all the power plant waste to use to make more power. I know it seemed like a dumb question but if I dont ask I will never know the answer.

  • @adamslurch71 The most effective way we know of for putting radiation to use to make power is to use it to super heat water and run turbines to generate electricity. I suppose you could then use that for electrolysis, but usually the electricity is more directly useful and if you use it that way you're going to lose yet more efficiency in another conversion.

  • @AnarchyInYourHead Yes I understand that but think about it there is how much radioactive waste each year that they just burry somewhere and its just sitting there doing nothing, I say put it to use.

  • @AnarchyInYourHead

    THis maybe a stuppid question, but Iv'e heard that the universe consist's of almost 90% Hydrogen. Isn't it possiblle to like, get some hydrogen, use a bit of our oksygen and use fuelcells...

  • @AnarchyInYourHead Yes but use your imagination, what if the water is split using solar and wind power? both abundant things then what's the problem? This is easily done with current and electrodes.

  • @MrROTD There's no problem I can think of. It would be one method of storing the energy thus produced.

  • @AnarchyInYourHead But did you know that it takes much less energy to break the water molecules than you get from burning the resulting HHO gas?

  • @AnarchyInYourHead did you hear? there was a current discovery, water is constantly changing its arrangment...its not stanle just not powerful.... its also magnetic just at a very small level!

  • whit ocean?

  • Water would be a good idea since the earth is mostly covered with it but in order to seperate molecules you need electricity. It is not efficient, sorry.

  • no true. what if you use a green source ( wind solar) it would be able to run on sun or wind power

  • @jotoew why not just use the energy from that DIRECTLY

  • That's the most retarded idea ever, using electricity to split molecules (may I add, that's only about 50% efficient), then burning it to make electricity (which is going to be like 20% efficient maybe at the max). So you're not going to get anything near the input.

    Also you can't make water become electricity. You can use it in the production of an electric potential.

  • Thats exactly what I was thinking. I cracked up when I saw they were burning it.

  • Yeah, it's been addressed a little but you NEED a lot of electricity to split the water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen which can then be burned as fuel. If you come up with a good method to produce electricity, like nuclear power, it's a great way to store the energy in another form. The water itself isn't a source of energy. You're just converting electricity into a different form of energy using water.

  • i heard there is a way to do it where it would not require a large amount of electricity, but i dont know if i believe it or not.

  • Haha, idiots trying to use electricity to produce electricity :D

    Ever heard of the law of conservation of energy?

  • 5* although the gas produced is infact just oxygen and hydrogen mixed together :S also known as brown gas :D (named after the guy who paitented the idea)

  • ok I already knew the water splitting story but I didn`t get it after the gas goes trough the hose. Do they heat water up and make steam?? or did I saw that wrong?

    Thanks in advance!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more