If that fool saw the entire debate he would've picked up some points. Hillary answered every assault with class and decency. All Guiliani did was embarrass himself further. He swings below the belt, no sophistication.
I'm a Democrat, I'm not a Hillary Clinton supporter, however... any of the Democrats running in the primary would make a good president, far better than any of the Republicans running, and even beyone far better than the guy in office now. So, I'll take her, but I'm hopeful that the media doesn't get to decide the primary this early and we have a surprise Democratic candidate.
I agree with you on every point. I fear that if Hillary wins, we will all endure a minimum of 4 years of the same bickering we have had since '92. As Dodd said, it's not really her fault, it's just a reality. I wish this nation could move on to something new.
Well, if Hillary wins and then wins another 4 yrs... that means at that point the US will have spent 28 years straight with either a Clinton or a Bush as president. That goes against the grain of this country I think... though it's the 12 years of Bushs that bother me the most!
I think that not voting for someone because of their last name is as foolish as voting for them because of their name... I don't think GW was so awful because he's a Bush but because he's an imbecile with an enormous ego - he would be so whether he was a Smith, a Jones or whatever else. So - Hillary should be judged on HERSELF. Can't we all see ABOVE this name craziness?
ron paul is way off in his views on the Dept. of Education and a Woman's Right to Choose. He's right on foreign policy, but so are all the Democrats, especially Edwards, Kucinich and Obama... Hillary Clinton is a bit to evasive on that issue.
The department of education is a disaster. Why take money away from local government and give it to the Feds so they can initiate policy like No Child Left Behind. Since we have had these policies, US education has diminished. Keep educational monies local and let the politicians who know their communities best initiate their own policies.
I am personally pro-choice and have a hard time supporting Paul because of it. But, his viewpoint is very admirable. His rationale for overtunring Roe v Wade is not because HE is pro-life (although he is), but that a civil rights decision should not hinge on the changing of a judge.
Note, he voted NO on a bill to dissalow women to go across state lines to have an abortion (in the event Roe v Wade were overturned.) He says that if the federal government is to make a law to protect a civil liberty, (as the pro-life/pro-choice debate is about whose civil liberty is being denied), it should be made as an amendment to the constitution. Otherwise, the decision should be made at the state level.
The dept of education isn't well funded. As long as our priorities are to be a War Economy at the expense of our infrastructure, education and other beneficial programs, of course non of the programs will work well.
Olberman ROCKS!
fmw50 3 years ago
Plagiarism is a BS charge. Guiliani is a BS politician.
Biden should have been the Democratic candidate ... Democrats are fools for focusing on these controversial frontrunners.
themountainviewguy 3 years ago
I've seen Keith and met Mr. Crawford. He's a very nice man.
catboxcatboxcatbox 4 years ago
I luv the presidential race. What a fkn circus!
luvu4ia 4 years ago
Rumblin', bumblin', stumblin' truly sums it up. Clinton, Edwards, and Obama I can do without -- Biden and Dodd (fat chance) are my
go-to-guys. If there is a God in heaven the 'draft Gore movement' will (hopefully) succeed.
goodmorgnnn 4 years ago
Olbermann is an Ass. Imus will fix this traitor on December 3rd, 2007
bvb720 4 years ago
bickering i can do without....solid score settling I can dig......
sturzzione 4 years ago
If that fool saw the entire debate he would've picked up some points. Hillary answered every assault with class and decency. All Guiliani did was embarrass himself further. He swings below the belt, no sophistication.
devilembace 4 years ago
I'm a Democrat, I'm not a Hillary Clinton supporter, however... any of the Democrats running in the primary would make a good president, far better than any of the Republicans running, and even beyone far better than the guy in office now. So, I'll take her, but I'm hopeful that the media doesn't get to decide the primary this early and we have a surprise Democratic candidate.
sineaddeburca 4 years ago
I agree with you on every point. I fear that if Hillary wins, we will all endure a minimum of 4 years of the same bickering we have had since '92. As Dodd said, it's not really her fault, it's just a reality. I wish this nation could move on to something new.
MadMustard 4 years ago
Well, if Hillary wins and then wins another 4 yrs... that means at that point the US will have spent 28 years straight with either a Clinton or a Bush as president. That goes against the grain of this country I think... though it's the 12 years of Bushs that bother me the most!
sineaddeburca 4 years ago 3
I think that not voting for someone because of their last name is as foolish as voting for them because of their name... I don't think GW was so awful because he's a Bush but because he's an imbecile with an enormous ego - he would be so whether he was a Smith, a Jones or whatever else. So - Hillary should be judged on HERSELF. Can't we all see ABOVE this name craziness?
Oranginaaa 4 years ago
It has nothing to do with names. It has to do with ideology and agendas.
sineaddeburca 4 years ago
No matter what party they come from, no one comes even close to Ron Paul.
daantje757 4 years ago
ron paul is way off in his views on the Dept. of Education and a Woman's Right to Choose. He's right on foreign policy, but so are all the Democrats, especially Edwards, Kucinich and Obama... Hillary Clinton is a bit to evasive on that issue.
sineaddeburca 4 years ago
The department of education is a disaster. Why take money away from local government and give it to the Feds so they can initiate policy like No Child Left Behind. Since we have had these policies, US education has diminished. Keep educational monies local and let the politicians who know their communities best initiate their own policies.
chiznaddy 4 years ago
I am personally pro-choice and have a hard time supporting Paul because of it. But, his viewpoint is very admirable. His rationale for overtunring Roe v Wade is not because HE is pro-life (although he is), but that a civil rights decision should not hinge on the changing of a judge.
chiznaddy 4 years ago
Note, he voted NO on a bill to dissalow women to go across state lines to have an abortion (in the event Roe v Wade were overturned.) He says that if the federal government is to make a law to protect a civil liberty, (as the pro-life/pro-choice debate is about whose civil liberty is being denied), it should be made as an amendment to the constitution. Otherwise, the decision should be made at the state level.
chiznaddy 4 years ago
The dept of education isn't well funded. As long as our priorities are to be a War Economy at the expense of our infrastructure, education and other beneficial programs, of course non of the programs will work well.
sineaddeburca 4 years ago
Gee Hillary: Liar-syn. hyprocrite, deceiver, prevaricator
I guess if you told the truth that would be a novel idea.
timothybauer 4 years ago
All I can say for Giuliani is BURN!
Strath3303 4 years ago
LMFAO! and i am partial to the conservatives!
edger76 4 years ago