Added: 5 years ago
From: 86beej
Views: 71,472
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (61)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • TG America beat it

  • @HipHopHatesRap Beat what? What you on about? TG America is a cheap copy of TG

  • @MrStig691 I know its a cheap copy. Nothing will ever equal the original TG but I really don't care which version of TG the record was set on. The fact of the matter is THE RECORD WAS BROKEN. It could've been broken on TG Ethiopia idc a record was still broken look it up

  • F1 car would make a veyron look like a 1.2 Clio, no comparison, veyron has no downforce, f1 car would be about 30-40 seconds faster round a track like silverstone. That's how fast they are. I've been to grandprixs and the cornering speed is almost unbelievable.

  • WTF is point of this video ?!?

  • wtf... people want to see formula vs buggati

  • @sakatis You actually think a buggati that weighs 2000kg and has 1000hp would win a 2005 f1 car 600kg with 970hp?

  • would it make a difference if it was a normal supercar? I mean the formula 1's tires just kept spinning because it had too much power.

  • That F1 car sounded fuckign amazing, easily the best sound in the world.

  • they should try this in the boeing assembly plant. if they can convince them to empty it of all the equipment lol

  • They should try something with all wheel drive to get some more traction on that floor (perhaps a veyron?)

  • The Stig spotted at 1.21

  • Why does he say "big V10" engine. A 3 litre v10 is small. Ofcoarse in F1 size is not important, since they do 18000 rpm in 2005, the later v8 22000 +.

  • @espjuan in normal regular life, a 3 litre V10 is big.. especially when a 2.5litre V6 looks fat like an impreza, or an evo... and the V8 in F1 isn't producing 22k rpm'cause it's limited at 18k... the V10 could do it as well.. if it wouldn't be limited..

  • @espjuan any 10 cylinder engine is very big.

  • hmm, id say a rallycross car wud be the best bet in that hall!

  • 19,000 rpm... o.0 wow!

  • thats not the stig. thats a arai helmet, not the simpson helmet

  • them people pushing the f1 car side ways must be strong lol

  • lol u plum its being rolled on da dolly wheels

  • lolll

  • Hey great vid.. No indoor land speed record eh?

    I can see a huge spike in cars though walls stats now. :)

  • Haha!

    Higher downforce is generated by higher air pressure on the body panels, wings etc.

    You get higher pressure by traveling fast thru the air.

    F1's might not be able to take a specific corner in 80mph, but in 150mph it's able to.

    When starting from zero mph, the car has zero downforce.

    If it wouldnt be the same pressure inside as outside, don't you think you would feel it when going outside in your ears?

  • Ok, that will have some effect. But I'm just saying if they paved over the floor with tarmac then the car would go a lot faster. They seem to manage ok in Monte Carlo when the track goes under the Casino.

  • No, YOU'RE wrong. Why shouldn't you get downforce indoors? It's not a vacuum in that big hall, there is air in there, same as outside. Okay the pressure and temperature might be a bit different but you'll still get downforce of some sort.

    The reason it wasn't as fast was because the tyres weren't designed to work on a smooth shiny surface like the one in that hall. They're designed to work on rough tarmac like on a race track.

  • your all wrong AND stupid. Downforce has absolutely no effect on a car below at least 60 mp/h

  • Wrong AND stupid? That's a bold statement.

    Let me tell you this: I studied Aerospace Engineering for 3 years at university and at no point did they they tell us that a wing will only produce aerodynamic lift above 60 mph. Is that a new law that you've just made up? Of course you get some downforce at those speeds, not a lot but enough to help F1 cars get round those tight corners.

    And by the way, don't call anyone stupid until you get your facts right!

  • I wasn't particularly referring to you, sorry dude. Might I add that F1 wings arn't meant to produce lift?? Quite the opposite in fact. I didnt study this, I work in the industry. I know this. And it is a fact that downforce wings are basically useless below 60 mp/h. Sure, a smidge of downforce is generated, but this is completely negligable when you consider the mass of the car. Mechanical grip is all that helps around slow corners, and F1 cars have tons of mechanical grip. Facts=straight

  • Fine, and when I used the term 'lift' I meant the generic term for force produced by a wing or airfoil section, which in this case acts in a downward direction. I am fully aware that F1 cars don't want upward lift produced by their wings.

    Anyway, with this clip it was all about the tyres and their lack of grip on the smooth floor.

  • quite right

  • top gear rules

  • It probably could have done better but that concrete looks as smooth as marble countertop haha

  • All of this talk about traction control, and yet I don't see anything about the fact that the car was basically on hard slicks. It would be pretty impossible to get traction on the polished floor, while it still being an F1 car.

  • F1 cars don't need traction control. A true racing car does not need electronic gizmos to kill the power to the rear wheels when there is slip. That is what the drivers brain and right foot are for.

  • F1 cars are too powerfull too control only pussy cars like indy-500 can do without traction control;)

  • There is no TC in F1 cars from this year after 10 years!

  • Ya thats why F1 needs Traction control.

    As fast as normal car without it.

  • yeh thats why there going just as fast without it in 2008 eh?

  • heheh lol ur right ...his talkin shit

  • ne var bunda a.k

  • The Stig in this is Ricardo Zonta - Toyota F1 test driver

  • the stig used a different helmet in the formula one car than he does when he goes around the top gear test track.

  • the reason he has a different helmet because of the HANS device.

  • this makes fun of formula 1 cars! they can do much more on a NORMAL track or bit of road

  • It isn't making fun at all. Its just a joke. I think you missed the point.

  • Top Gear ftw!

  • no it was i fuck my momma to the tune of an engine!!!!

  • that would have been funny if the chevy had the inside world record, lol

  • I think it was "blah blah blah im a dirty tramp"

  • They do not will race against each other or somthing. only will look at them with those chevrolet Chevy how fast a normal car is possible. It's no game for which fastest is possible!

  • what the fuck did you just say?

  • ill second that.

  • third

  • Motor bike would be first.

  • nice

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more