Global Warming - Do you have ALL of the facts? Part 5/5

[x11115]

good videos but co2 is very important because it reflects more light than other gases because it's radiative forcing is many times other gases. water evaporation may explain why the oceans haven't risen. i don't buy the argument that co2 isn't responsible for record temps there's just no basis to eliminate co2 from the picture. it's obviously a major factor. highest co2 emitters #1 usa, #2 china, #3 Russia. it's no wonder the information regarding co2 is suppressed.

[rickrocker]

Actually, Water Vapor makes up 95% of Greenhouse gases. CO2 makes up less than 4%. Of that 4%, humans contribute 3.4% to all CO2 emissions on Earth. Humans contribute about 0.28% of all greenhouse gases. Volcanos emit the most CO2 and there have been very big eruptions in the past two decades.

[8av8today]

Awesome rebuttal. Well said. I've been a State certified conservationist for 10 years and quite frankly the drive here is MONEY. The models are fed inaccurate information and they project inaccurately. The thermos sensors placed on the earth are placed near heat radiating objects and or property. The Thermo sensors should be at least 1 mile from heat sources for data to be correct. It's quite an elaborate swindle.

[rickrocker]

Well, Global Warming IS a THEORY and a complex one at that. I'm not going to wipe it completely off the table because I can't prove it's NOT true as an Atheist cannot prove the inexistance of gods but, with the complete lack of hard evidence minus the 'if it were true then..' evidence and the inability to tie human 'greenhouse' emission to it, I'm only putting the same stock into it as I do any other religion.

[8av8today]

Wrong! Certified State for Conservationist 10 years. The studies in showing USA as the highest are only because the data from China and Russia could not be obtained in ti's entirety and or was destroyed or censored by the local Gov. Only the USA provided transparency in the studies. I was in Moscow when we were not allowed to see the sites on our schedule for some unknown reason. In China, my colleagues were followed by 10 goons and the papers reviewed by them before export. Sorry sir. Wrong!

[SauceMystery]

Peer-reviewed :

from the abstract of this seminal work : "... be considered in the testing of cloud parameterizations in climate models, which remain sources of substantial uncertainty in global warming prediction."

search :

Cloud and Radiation Budget Changes Associated with Tropical Intraseasonal Oscillations

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 34, L15707, doi:10.1029/2007GL029698, 2007

It is also in a video here in YouTube under this title :

Why the IPCC models are wrong - Part 1

[SocratesTheGadfly]

the models are also wrong because when they are run backwards in time to predict what happened in the past, the earth reaches absolute zero in many computer models around the year 550 BC. roughly 2600 years ago no life on the earth existed, i am sure the hellenes would be surprised by that information.

[circusboy90210]

When the undersea temperature sensors were installed a few years later it was found that they were incorrectly reading high(by how much I forget). However this was never corrected before this faulty data set were entered into the even furtherly incorrect copuer model. I wonder who's political objective thsi was. ;-)