Did you know the Pentagon was struck in the section FARTHEST from the leadership (NMCC/SecDef), was mostly empty (about 5 of 6 normally there were not),The only part that had specially reinforced walls to resist bomb blasts & contain debris(Steel & kevlar),with full fire sprinkler coverage?Was struck perfectly to take advantage of this(striking at ground level with a trajectory parallel to the ground diagonally so it penetrated only 3 of 5 rings but would have hit all if it had struck dead on.
I've been a truther about as long as anyone & I have never ever heard anyone claim Burlingame was a terrorist. So,if you're going to knock down strawmen at least don't contradict yourself but claiming in 1 video truthers believe it was a missile that hit the Pentagon & turn right around claim truthers believe the pilot of 77 flew the plane into the Pentagon himself.It's pretty obvious we can't believe both.
@waitew Truthers believe about 1,000 diff things & will believe about anything.. You could start a rumor that Bush was seen buying 2,000 lbs of thermite at Home Depot & the truthers would believe it even without a bad doctored photo & it would never even cross their mind that Home Depot doesn't sell thermite & if you pointed that out they would say it was a special clearance sale or something equally as stupid.
@shananagans5 Actually I was thinking it was the other way round.Anybody who could believe the official story could believe just about anything. Case in point,did you know there are people actually stupid enough to believe the USA invaded the Middle East & that it didn't have a damn thing to with OIL? What kind of moron could believe that?
@waitew since "truthers" are not an autonomous cophesive group with identical beliefs your comment is silly.
fact is they have a wide variety of discrepencies in details, they have to because if they sat down and put together their story completely it would be ridiculous.
@batvette "they have a wide variety of discrepencies in details"[Quote] so does the official story.For the 1st 2 weeks no fighters were scramble until after the Pentagon was hit,then suddenly they were from 2 bases & in time to stop both FL175 & FL77 but somehow were sent over the sea instead & they knew about both flights.Then 3 years later they 'discovered' they didn't really know about them (The Commission changed all the notification times) until after they crashed & on & on it gos
@aaexpress6767 And the records also show that the cockpit door did not open for the 3 previous flights of that plane. So unless you believe the pilots climbed into the cockpit through the window, it was most likely a faulty sensor.
Hardly anybody who views RKOwens4' fake, trolling deflunker videos, actually takes him or the video seriously. Way to 'convert' those annoying, history-changing twoofers, aye Owens? Lol.
i never seen this conspiracy before, most people feel 9/11 was an inside job because government is always seeking new ways to increase it's power and crisis is always the best instrument to do so.
I wouldn't call this guy a terrorist. The folks we vote for transform into terrorist when we send them to Washington, they don't even read the laws they vote yes on.
I dont get it, I have listened over and over again to this and not one time di I hear them say he was a terrorist ? What would the time frame for this be ? And alos who are you , a child of whom?? Just checking because I think there is a big misunderstanding here.
Loose change didnt accuse of Burlingame of being a terrorist. They even said "when flight 77 ALLEGEDLY flew into the Pentagon." Losse change doubts a commercial plane even hit the Pentagon.
I like how this guy likes to pull out specific testimony or witness. But when any of them doesn't go with the official lie. They come and bash them & use everything they can to discredit the people they don't like for what they say.
More desperation.
Maybe she shouldn't read what she can't handle & the author of this video too & most of the world.
The truth is ugly. But it's out an many cannot cover that truth they can only stonewall it.
Absolute, ridiculous garbage. I'm not aware of anyone seriously claiming Burlingame was a co-conspirator or terrorist. We simply don't know HOW supposed hijackers could have wrested control away from the flight-crew without at LEAST a Hijack-in-Progress signal being activated by one of the pilots or co-pilots on ANY of the 911 flights.
But above all, there's NOTHING to show Burlingame was a 'hero' instead of a victim.
@starmanskye Pretend to be a pilot and I'll pretend to be a terrorist, and we'll see just how fast you can punch in a code before I stab you with a box cutter. Lol... some people's kids...
At the end of the day the perps of 911 won't get caught but so that you can get a good idea who the cast of characters is type the following into You Tube search and try not to vomit when you watch the video:
Just to clarify, I don't think the Truthers are calling the pilot a terrorist, in fact I think their whole point is that there were no terrorists involved. Kooky yes, but equally kooky is to insinuate anybody thought Burlingame was in league with Muslim whackos. Also, it should be noted that in the Moussawi trial record, the phone call that Olsen supposedly made from the plane was ZERO second long, meaning it never connected. I suggest omitting that point from your video.
@soldierboyz22 I'm private investigator. Not very good one, but still...
You look more like conspiracy theorist. Everything that you don't like, yo call in some embarrassing word to make you feel better.
You watch some "9/11 inside job" videos... you feel bad. Then you search for "debunker" videos... and you feel good again. Then you read comments... FCK! You feel bad again, because KBendix can't just fck off! So you have to write some meaningless comment, to feel good again. :)
@Merlin5by5 How do you know what i have in my hands? :p
Only thing i see is that so called debunkers warp and twist info so they can fit it for their explanation (investigator side does it too... unfortunately). + they are trying to make other investigators feel bad for investigating.
Only because someone can make nice looking theory doesn't mean that his theory is true. And both sides should remember that.
@Merlin5by5 Hm... it doesn't look like you have done lot of thinking.
It doesn't start with assumption. But looks like you start with it... like it is impossible for evil elements in government to do something like that.
And it is not even about possibility of that. It is about What If It turns Out To Be Truth.
Tell me... how likely it is to have fire in house? ~0,01%? But does it mean you don't fireproof you house?
So think about consequences of bad elements in governments if you don't prepare.
@KBendix I don't think you are able to see the truth about science of humanity today. ~90% of scientists see only what they want to see. Things that make them feel good and convince them that they are one of the smartest beings in universe ever. That's why they hate so much theories about creation of human.
Most of technology making doesn't involve viewing world with 100% opened eyes.
Anything and anyone that they don't like, gets ridiculed. They have no credibility in my eyes.
@Merlin5by5 You only think you are able to see the truth. You see only what you like to see. I can tell it by your manner. I have listened to both sides and i know that popular side always twists the information to fit their needs (if twisting is needed). They never confront opponents and, if they do, they constantly try to ruin debates and is trying to manipulate opponents psychologically.
There is peoples who disagree with me but we still have nice debates. Not like this troll thing you do.
I can't find any other explanation of your rage. You are so mad to those who talk about possibility of 9/11 inside job, because you don't like that they ruin your illusion of world, where you control your life and government is bad, but not THAT bad. The illusion of world, where elections is real deal and peoples is in charge. ...world where U.S. is best country in world and there is enemies only outside... not INSIDE.
@KBendix You havent ruin anything bt your credibility whic you ont know what that means because you only believe those without credibility. I can ell you havent been to college because anyone who has takes communications classes in their first year and learns how to find credible information which truthers have none at all. Congradulations on gettingyour YouTube education now you can say, would you like fries with that, for the rest of your pathetic life.
@db10001110101 I don't believe. I'm not using believing at all in my life. I know or don't know. I don't say that i know about 9/11. Unlike guys like you.
And don't tell me about high school. It is one big brainwashing world wide system to make peoples like you and scientists like that majority who BELIEVE (and don't know) that 9/11 official story is true. It is very hard to get out of that brainwash, especially after finishing more than high school.
@KBendix I didnt say hig school I said college cant you read? I love how you talk shoit about scientist and say they are brainwashed for looking at credible evidence and doing real research and not watching biased brainwashing films like you. You have to be a huge moron who couldnt make it in college. Good for you and your YouTube education kid. You dont know shit. Also your entire statement is wrong because any educated person know you cannot know everything about anything kid. Go to school
@db10001110101 It starts at high school. That's the problem. And it's not that much about looking at evidence. It's about ignoring it.
Most interesting thing is that you don't know a thing about me. Somehow I'm working together with university on one engineering project now. :p I know where they look at credible evidence, and when they don't. I didn't finish college. I was born with this moron thing called... THINKING. Couldn't take that brainwash anymore. Now i control what i do and when i do.
@KBendix Yes high school and prooaganda films are both stupid and it takes an itelligent person to be able to wade through the bullshit. I am almost entirely self taught and read many books for knowledge. but you dont get it that you need to know how t look at credible evidnce and science isnt a conspiracy and saying itis shows you mut be a moron. I also think you are a liar because no university would hire a college drop out to work on an engineering project unless you are on clean up.
@KBendix What braniwashing couldnt you take? Was it when you would bring up your 9/11 truther fairy tale they told you to cited credile sources and when you cited loose chnage and got laughed at you got mad and quit saying I'm tired of this brainwashing when it is your side that is most quilty. Good luck with your YouTube education.
@db10001110101 Your so retard ill believe every single conspiracy theory if you can prove with facts that : American Airlines, United airlines, government, FDYN, FOX, CNN, ABC, Holographic planes,military,terrorists, the president, World trade center security, FDA, Pentagon, police, FBI, CIA, Bushes brother, Demolition teams, scientists, camera crews, eye witnesses, plane passengers, If you can prove all these people worked together to have 9/11 ill believe you but until then gtfo
@Mikester1200 Hey retard I'm not a truther and dont believe any of these and you would know that if you could read. Damn you must be a moron. I dont believe any of that bullshit and none of my comments state that I do so you need to read comments before you post your bullshit.
@Merlin5by5 You don't know a thing about Syria or Iran. Only thing is that you get from media. And there comes in your blind believing in things you like. N-Korea is better example. No one really knows what is going on there. I'm not saying that it is OK. But you don't know.
You better go out and try to talk about "9/11 inside job" in public in US, or try to paint bank on fire, or sell lemonade... will see what will happen to you.
Now it is excuses to arrest you. Soon it will turn in real deal.
@Merlin5by5 Your source of info is? You didn't go to Iran, Syria, N-Korea and didn't see it for yourself. It is media and government that tells you that. And you simply believe it. Look at chain of lies in Libya case.
As i explained before. It is about believing and not knowing. Unfortunately so called 9/11 truthers believes in most cases as well, and don't know.
All you have is only PLAUSIBLE (but not proven to be true) official theory about 9/11. That is what those debunkers BELIEVE in.
@Merlin5by5 You wasn't there when Kim did that. You don't know if he did it like it is said he did or did it at all. You blindly believe in those info sources. Arab websites? So what? What makes them 100% true?
Looks like you are the one here who only listens to ONE side and dismiss alternative media. Look in other info sources and analyze it.
I'm not saying that those info sources is true, but you can get more info about Al'Qaeda in Libya, killings done by rebels and PROOF for that.
Exactly, but you will see CT constantly ignoring evidence (cell phone tower logs) that prove the calls went though. Most of the calls were short in length, but calls were made.
First of all everyone knows your cell phone will not get any signal on the airplane 30,000 ft up. And thats 2001 technology. So how did the Pilot call his wife. The call was a forge over a somewhat stactically and poor volume audio clip. Second, men who work for the secret government agencies do not discuss their work with their wives and family. Of course the family didnt know anything.
@askiaf Yes cell phones did work. The calls were dropped quickly, but they still worked. Most of the calls that were any length were from in flight phones. Stop spreading lies.
@Kyles45Angel Not to mention, most cell calls were made at lower altitudes. There is also an account from a passenger on Delta flight 1989, which was originally thought to be a highjacked flight, where one of the passengers was repeatedly making calls on his phone.
@cantonear1968 you are moron,you dont even know the secret operations they do in the c.i.a. and the pentagon,you are foolish person,you are a slave to the u.s. government and you live in debt,wake up,the u.s. government is fooling us,watch this video,its about how america went from freedom to facism:
@cantonear1968 how do we know about them? are you dumb?didnt you hear wikileaks release over 90,000 documents of secret documents of the u.s. government?
@1123359 And did wikileaks name Burlingame as a CIA agent? Again, wikileaks notwithstanding, how do you know about secret operations if their secret? If wikileaks exposes it, it's no longer a secret. If it hasn't, then it's a secret and you are simply making things up!
So again, did wikileaks name Burlingame as a CIA operative? Or did you just make that up?
"Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.”
Why defend tyranny? Why defend the corrupt? Why not fix this mess. We have some very sick people loose in our government. They have some very destructive control issues. psychopathic. homicidal. cut military spending. get rid of the CIA. and put money into science. alternative, renewable energy. why support a group of greedy monsters? Let's move forward, no?
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”-Joseph Goebbels
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
not true. a lie. The Open Chemical Physics Journal ISSN: 1874-4125. discovery of "live" nanothermite. they can "explode" it. evidence is they used a lot of it. as in tons of it. your readers should go read it. not you. you're a waste. btw. this is not gonna go away. better find a scapegoat quick. maybe wait until Cheney dies and blame it all on him. good luck with that.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?
that's all diversionary BS. the FACT is that the buildings were demolished. fundamental laws of physics. simply put no structure can descend uniformly without an external force weakening the supporting structure. all s WTC bldngs. fell uniformly. WTC#7? Please. NTC FINALLY had to admit to free fall.in doing so they admitted to CD. no building can fall at free fall in a perfectly symmetrical fashion across 300' width without the use of explosives.physically impossible. why defend greedy monsters?
What "fundamental laws of physics" were broken on 911? Please list the actual laws and how they were broken. Feel free to include equations and calculations.
Oh yeah the WTC fell soooooo uniformly into its own footprint that it destroyed/damaged WTC 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 20 other surrounding buidlings!
@ctcole77 Lost & Unaccounted for in Iraq - $9 billion of US taxpayers' money and $549.7 milion in spare parts shipped in 2004 to US contractors. Also, per ABC News, 190,000 guns, including 110,000 AK-47 rifles.
Lost and Reported Stolen - $6.6 billion of U.S. taxpayers' money earmarked for Iraq reconstruction, reported on June 14, 2011 by Special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction Stuart Bowen who called it "the largest theft of funds in national history." (Source - CBS News)
Respond to this video... Missing - $1 billion in tractor trailers, tank recovery vehicles, machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and other equipment and services provided to the Iraqi security forces. (Per CBS News on Dec 6, 2007.)
Respond to this video... Troops in Iraq - Total 46,000 U.S. troops. All other nations have withdrawn their troops.
U.S. Troop Casualties - 4,469 US troops; 98% male. 91% non-officers; 82% active duty, 11% National Guard; 74% Caucasian, 9% African-American, 11% Latino. 19% killed by non-hostile causes. 54% of US casualties were under 25 years old. 72% were from the US Army
Non-U.S. Troop Casualties - Total 316, with 179 from the UK
Respond to this video... Private Contractors in Iraq, Working in Support of US Army Troops - More than 180,000 in August 2007, per The Nation/LA Times.
Journalists killed - 148, 97 by murder and 51 by acts of war
Journalists killed by US Forces - 14
Iraqi Police and Soldiers Killed - 9,950 as of Jan 31, 2011
Respond to this video... work it out dumbo american. Let's see if you can join the dots....I bet you can't because you are a fuck'n dumb american...i can't wait LOL
"Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane. I think an American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass and it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"
- "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001
"Aydan Kizildrgli, an English language student who is a native of Turkey, saw the jetliner bank slightly then strike a western wall of the huge five-sided building that is the headquarters of the nation's military. 'There was a big boom,' he said. 'Everybody was in shock. I turned around to the car behind me and yelled "Did you see that?" Nobody could believe it.'"
- "Bush Vows Retaliation for 'Evil Acts'." USA Today, 11 Sep 2001
@drewsiboberinski Why don't you foreigners stop worrying about how dumb you think americans are or complaining about the way my country is run. We sure as hell don't think about you pseudo-europeans down under.
@drewsiboberinski Actually I must apologize. I "spoke" without thinking. We do give thought to second rate nations whenever we are looking for a good vacation spot.
How much do you get paid to do this? Can you say cognitive infiltration? If not familiar this is a technique of suppressing conspiracy theories that Regulatory & Information Czar Cass Sunstein proposed in 2008. Google it. Back to you. Thousands of architects, engineers, physicists, chemists, pilots, etc. put their careers & credibility on the line? They need attention? LOL. Think of the consequences of this false flag op and then go locate your soul. THEN do the right thing. Do it for your kids.
TO DATE theres isnt 1 PIC OR VID that even shows a commercial airliner used on 9/11! its ASTONISHING!! missing plane at pentagon and the 4th that 'melted in a field (shot down), the only footage of the 1st plane hitting wtc is a blur, there are NUMEROUS SHOTS of the 2nd plane hit wtc, but not one shows the colours/tail of an AA or UA jet, they have all been altered, if you watch closely you can make out a blue/white tail! THAT IS NOT A PASSENGER JET!! Watch 'september clues' on YT! 9/11's a lie
The poles where not struck by the plane. I have a friend of a friend that works at the NTSB and she said that the plane was on the oppossite side of the gas station as the pole. Even the taxi driver said he lied about the poles, his wife works for the FBI. Many witnesses say differently as well.
@timedmil Search for "911 military exercises". The first link should be a Wikipedia page. Click on it. The only hijacking exercise being run was a traditional one. While similar exercises had been conducted in the past, there was none in operation on Sept. 11th, 2001.
Despite Hanjour's poor reviews, he did have some ability as a pilot, said chief flight instructor Marcel Bernard of Freeway Airport. "There's no doubt in my mind that once that [hijacked jet] got going, he could have pointed that plane at a building and hit it."
@ctcole77 I've heard pilots on JREF say they managed to get untrained people--including children--to hit the WTC and Pentagon pretty consistently in a flight simulator. It wouldn't be that hard.
as a VERY patriotic american old school conserative, ronald reagan was our last great president sad to say, that said if u dont vote because u say there isnt anyboedy to vote for well your right but like my dad always told me "to many ppl died for my right to vote for me not to vote" mr.bright. if u dont like whos runnin go vote for your self atleast, yes this goverment is in shambles to say the least and untill u ppl stop voting the same ppl in there will be no change go vote for who isnt run
just wanna point out that nowhere did the words of the loose change narrator say that the pilot was a TERRORIST. also the phone call stating that the pilots were in the back with other passengers makes no sense since it been said that hijackers killed other pilots so why would they leave those alive, also if they were alive why no retailation like in the flight 93 case of trying to get the plane back. makes sense if u have the pilot STILL alive to fly for u.
@storrent1 united 93 was hijacked late and crashed late.......by then it became apparent that the terroists werent letting any of the passengers out due to the incidents in new york and at the pentagon so they fought back.......here none of the passengers were aware and i also believe on flight 77 there were more hijackers then on 93 so maybe they did fight back just not in time
I am lost here I thought the Truth movement says that NO PLANE hit the pentagon, so why would they say the pilot of said flight was a terrorist??? USA is all mixed up. they need an independent international investigation on the whole incident from scratch. BUT due to the high level of corruption in the Us this would be impossible as they would need the US Gov't to be impartial and support the inquiry..which would not happen....so sad
@WELLBRAN No they don't need a new investigation. The only assholes who are changing their story and adjusting their version of events due to lack of evidence are the conspiracy theorists. No amount of investigation will satisfy these shitdicks because its not about finding out what actually happened, its about the thrill of feeling like they could be the ones to blow the lid off of a major govt conspiracy, no matter how many times they get proven wrong or have their theories shit all over.
@WELLBRAN The truthers can't keep their story straight. They claim the evidence is "obvious", yet can't even say whether the Pentagon was hit by a missile, a fighter, a military transport plane, a mocked-up jet, or remote-controlled Flight 77. Much less their studious avoidance of the question of how the thousands of explosives in WTC1/2/7 were planted and not noticed by ~500,000 people passing through the buildings daily, along with other holes in their claims.
@EGRJ Of course they can't keep their stories straight. Half the truthers believe Flight 93 was shot down, and the other half believe it landed in Cleveland. If it landed in Cleveland, where are the passengers? And the plane? If it was shot down, why would the government lie about it? Considering that 3 other planes hit their targets, a shoot down, while being a tough decision to make, would show the government made a last ditched effort to protect us.
@eaglejoe8 uh sorry, i call bullshit. no 757 hit the pentagon, show me proof of it, and look at a normal plane crash, there is debris everywhere, flight 93? all over the damn place away from the impact zone, meaning it was crumbling apart before its crash. now thats my theory. now you get me a video, ill say wow im sorry. i was stupid, till then. nobody is right.
@stingray8881 There was debris at the Pentagon. A simple Google search will show you this. And normal plane crashes don't happen by going into a reinforced concrete building at very high speeds. As for Flight 93, the only debris away from the crash site were lightweight pieces of papers or fibers, or very small metal pieces. Had it been shot down, there would have been debris found in the flight path, as it was, the secondary debris fields were in the direction the wind was going.
@eaglejoe8 okay, your telling me the flight 93 crash looked like a regular crash? just look up plane wrecks. its a Boeing 757 jet. its massive, and some how it was doing way over its operating limit. not to mention the pentagon it one of the most heavily surveillanced places in the USA.
@stingray8881 There have been other crashes that at first sight, look like no plane crashed. But the fact of the matter is, id did crash where it is said to have crashed. 95% of the plane was recovered, and everyone on board was identified. The onus of proof that it landed/crashed elsewhere is on you. Good luck.
As for the Pentagon, do you really think every camera is going to be pointed at exactly the point of impact? Security camers are low resolution, and only record 1 frame per second.
@eaglejoe8 okay, then what about the gas station cameras, the hotel/apartment cameras? the highway cameras? and even if they were 1 frame per second. there are still different angles of the approach ? ive been there. ive been to the memorial site. the plane would have been caught by many cameras. and was. but since whats on thoes tapes, is why they wont release then, explain why it to 5 years to release 5 frames? if a plane did hit? why take that long? to make sure you didnt see anything.
@stingray8881 Believe me, there was a point in time when I questioned a lot of this myself. As it was first explainedto me, security tapes loop, and eventually record over themselves which explains why they were confiscated so quickly. Most cameras are also going to record their own property, not the building across the street, but they're taken on the off chance that they show SOMETHING. Most didn't record anything worth noting. Also, even though the tapes were taken, and shown at the Moussaoui
@eaglejoe8 the hotel across the street recorded it. the staff sat there in shock to what they were watching. then, here comes the FBI. and no your wrong. a staff of then 9/11 commission janice kepart i think, last names probably spelled wrong., even said the government has a huge deal for secrecy, witch means there still hiding the truth from you and me. other wise that wouldn't of been said, and what about rumsfelds sip of the tongue, saying flight 93 was shot down?
@stingray8881 Rumsfeld obviously misspoke. Think about this logically. If FL93 were shot down, why would the government deny it? If 911 was an inside job, why would they not allow FL93 to hit it's target? In light of the fact that 3 other airplanes hit their targets, shooting down FL93 would show the gov'ment was doing what they could to protect us, so there'd be no reason to deny it. Shooting down FL93 is a direct contradiction to the "inside job" theory.
@eaglejoe8 it was going to the white house right? im not saying a pissed off Arabian wasn't flying that plane. but if it were going to the white house, they would have shot it down. the twin towers and such, nobody will ever know. its a cover up. you say its going to the white house to cause panic. then it crashes. hm. the part of the pentagon blown up to hide trillions of missing money, nobody ever talks about that September 10th conference again, and i am right on that.
@stingray8881 Wait a second. You're saying a "pissed off Arabian" was flying the plane, and it was likely headed to the WH, and the government had it shot down? By your own words, that is a direct contradiction to being an inside job. Unless you expect me to believe the other 3 events that day were all done by the government, but at the same time, some "pissed off Arabian" had planned to do the exact same thing. That makes no sense at all, and it still doesn't explain why the government would...
@eaglejoe8 okay you explain why there is such a wide range of debris. the pentagon was obviously struck to hide a massive money scam. but then again, you cant really prove me wrong. because there was isnt any proof. but for me, i can say what i look at cant be right.
@eaglejoe8 what did you prove me wrong about ? there was obviously something wrong with flight 93s crash. there are eye witness reports to it. and the pentagon? i mean damn. so many stories. so many '' debunkers'' but yet.. i still have nothing to refer to. no video. nothing.
@stingray8881 I proved you wrong on the idea that the Pentagon was "blown up" to hide trillions of dollars lost. And since you've already acknowledged that a "pissed off Arabian" was flying FL93, it's illogical to assume none of the other flights were, which renders the rest of your points moot.
@eaglejoe8 i was talking about the recordings from the black box. if flight 93 wasnt shot down, why was the debris scattered ? no bodies found. just bits and pieces of debris? explain on why its not a normal crash site. and second. there are highway cameras, 1 over looking both sides of the highway plus the side of the building hit. where the hell is that footage? don't tell me it didn't catch anything. your obviously brainwashed. and listen to who is lying about it all?
@stingray8881 Uh, you're wrong there guy. Everyone onboard FL93 was identified through DNA. You're second mistake is thinking that every crash site leaves recognizable debris. A little research would show you that not to be the case. It's rare, but does happen. If you want to believe highway cameras are put in lace to watch the Pentagon, and not, you know, the highway, then I can't help you. And Loose Change? I've seen it. It's a hack film and has been debunked.
@eaglejoe8 i didn't say it wasn't flight 93. im just saying for scattered debris ranging up to 42000 feet away, the crash isnt ''normal''. per say. and yes highway cams watch the highway. but the plane would have past right by it showing impact?
@stingray8881 The debris that was found to be 8 miles away was said to be small pieces of paper, and light weight fibers. Items that can be blown into the air by the explosion on impact, and easily be carried away by the 10MPH wind that was blowing in the exact direction it was found. As for the cameras. Again, they're low resolution, and film as a rate of 1 frame /second. Effective for catching objects like cars or people, but not effective for catching a much faster moving object going 500MPH.
Did you know the Pentagon was struck in the section FARTHEST from the leadership (NMCC/SecDef), was mostly empty (about 5 of 6 normally there were not),The only part that had specially reinforced walls to resist bomb blasts & contain debris(Steel & kevlar),with full fire sprinkler coverage?Was struck perfectly to take advantage of this(striking at ground level with a trajectory parallel to the ground diagonally so it penetrated only 3 of 5 rings but would have hit all if it had struck dead on.
waitew 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY MY SON RYAN KYLE OWENS IS PAID TO MAKE THESE VIDEOS AND POST THEM ON YOUTUBE.
HE HELPED US FINANCE OUR NEW HOME WITH MONEY HE WONT TELL ME WHERE IT IS COMING FROM
I AM NOW AWARE OF HIS LIES ON YOUTUBE AND TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR HIS ACTIONS
ANYONE WHO WANTS TO TALK TO ME OR RYAN DIRECTLY CAN CALL ME AT MY HOUSE NUMBER FOR A FORMAL APOLOGY
(423) 913-0562
276 Hartman Rd
Jonesborough, TN 37659-3720
ONCE AGAIN, I AM SORRY FOR HIS DISINFORMATION AND LIES IN THESE VIDEOS
CynthiaOwens 1 week ago
See YT Vid:
9-11 Cheney Rumsfeld Black Operation at Pentagon...15min.
also...Pentagon Attack Papers....
MrNoblemanoflove 2 weeks ago
I've been a truther about as long as anyone & I have never ever heard anyone claim Burlingame was a terrorist. So,if you're going to knock down strawmen at least don't contradict yourself but claiming in 1 video truthers believe it was a missile that hit the Pentagon & turn right around claim truthers believe the pilot of 77 flew the plane into the Pentagon himself.It's pretty obvious we can't believe both.
waitew 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@waitew
" I have never ever heard anyone claim Burlingame was a terrorist"
Really? Can you read between the ines of the post directly before you?
"LMAO this is so fail."
ExposeTheTwooferCult 1 month ago
@waitew Truthers believe about 1,000 diff things & will believe about anything.. You could start a rumor that Bush was seen buying 2,000 lbs of thermite at Home Depot & the truthers would believe it even without a bad doctored photo & it would never even cross their mind that Home Depot doesn't sell thermite & if you pointed that out they would say it was a special clearance sale or something equally as stupid.
shananagans5 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from RKOwens4
@shananagans5 Actually I was thinking it was the other way round.Anybody who could believe the official story could believe just about anything. Case in point,did you know there are people actually stupid enough to believe the USA invaded the Middle East & that it didn't have a damn thing to with OIL? What kind of moron could believe that?
waitew 2 weeks ago
@waitew since "truthers" are not an autonomous cophesive group with identical beliefs your comment is silly.
fact is they have a wide variety of discrepencies in details, they have to because if they sat down and put together their story completely it would be ridiculous.
batvette 1 day ago
@batvette "they have a wide variety of discrepencies in details"[Quote] so does the official story.For the 1st 2 weeks no fighters were scramble until after the Pentagon was hit,then suddenly they were from 2 bases & in time to stop both FL175 & FL77 but somehow were sent over the sea instead & they knew about both flights.Then 3 years later they 'discovered' they didn't really know about them (The Commission changed all the notification times) until after they crashed & on & on it gos
waitew 1 day ago
if i was on the planes that hit th wtc buildings i would make sure with my life the terrorists wouldent win. evan if that meant everyone onboard died
forresterL11 1 month ago
LMAO this is so fail.
joshbarber89 1 month ago
@Sidionian what are your standards of trolling then? Anyone that doesn't think or speak like you?
I need my tin foil back. I have to cook a Turkey.
alexkills 2 months ago
How is Charles Burlingame a hero?
nb45001 2 months ago
Flight 77's cockpit never opened. Pilots for 911 truth is the source. FBI and NTSB refuse to comment. Debunk that!!!!!
aaexpress6767 2 months ago
@aaexpress6767 And the records also show that the cockpit door did not open for the 3 previous flights of that plane. So unless you believe the pilots climbed into the cockpit through the window, it was most likely a faulty sensor.
Debunked!
cantonear1968 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RKOwens4
Hardly anybody who views RKOwens4' fake, trolling deflunker videos, actually takes him or the video seriously. Way to 'convert' those annoying, history-changing twoofers, aye Owens? Lol.
R.I.P., RKOwens4.
Sidionian 2 months ago
i never seen this conspiracy before, most people feel 9/11 was an inside job because government is always seeking new ways to increase it's power and crisis is always the best instrument to do so.
I wouldn't call this guy a terrorist. The folks we vote for transform into terrorist when we send them to Washington, they don't even read the laws they vote yes on.
mechanicalbu11 2 months ago
I dont get it, I have listened over and over again to this and not one time di I hear them say he was a terrorist ? What would the time frame for this be ? And alos who are you , a child of whom?? Just checking because I think there is a big misunderstanding here.
bunnykins110P 3 months ago
Loose change didnt accuse of Burlingame of being a terrorist. They even said "when flight 77 ALLEGEDLY flew into the Pentagon." Losse change doubts a commercial plane even hit the Pentagon.
ssike01 3 months ago
I like how this guy likes to pull out specific testimony or witness. But when any of them doesn't go with the official lie. They come and bash them & use everything they can to discredit the people they don't like for what they say.
More desperation.
Maybe she shouldn't read what she can't handle & the author of this video too & most of the world.
The truth is ugly. But it's out an many cannot cover that truth they can only stonewall it.
The world knows & their listening.
Snowman374th 3 months ago
Right? Yeah, right. Nothing you can do about it.
NickWaterfall 3 months ago
This comment section will now focus on name of music.
NickWaterfall 3 months ago
NAME OF THE MUSIC.
NickWaterfall 3 months ago
Name of music please?
NickWaterfall 3 months ago
How dare to call this man a terrorist. God! Conspiracists are so blind and disrespctful! :C
preppychrisbou 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TYPICAL TRUTHER VS DEBUNKER ARGUEMENT:
9/11 truther: 80-90 camera's on at the Pentagon on 9/11 and none clearly captured the Flight 77 crash.
Debunker: WHAAAAAAAAT!
Truther: i've just told you.
debunker: w3 hav3 footag3 of a plan3 crash at t3h p3ntagon. (shows 5 frames of bad quality which is clearly censored)
truther: *face palm*
theFunnierWill211187 3 months ago
@lascienvacas you take the official story as gospel when the government and media lie all the time. be careful who you call stupid.
plsvc1985 4 months ago
Absolute, ridiculous garbage. I'm not aware of anyone seriously claiming Burlingame was a co-conspirator or terrorist. We simply don't know HOW supposed hijackers could have wrested control away from the flight-crew without at LEAST a Hijack-in-Progress signal being activated by one of the pilots or co-pilots on ANY of the 911 flights.
But above all, there's NOTHING to show Burlingame was a 'hero' instead of a victim.
ANOTHER awful, truly WRETCHED 'Debunked' FAIL.
starmanskye 4 months ago
@starmanskye Umm Loose Change claimed he was dumbass
ChrisHill991 4 months ago
@starmanskye Pretend to be a pilot and I'll pretend to be a terrorist, and we'll see just how fast you can punch in a code before I stab you with a box cutter. Lol... some people's kids...
KomatiPoort 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (Donated) For Debates And Governance
Topics: THE WEAPON THAT CAN BREAK THE CYCLE OF WAR AND TERRORISM, Debated Issues, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
balanceddiet.yolasite.com
balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
SPREAD THIS BOOK AND CONQUER THE SPREADING EVIL BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE - FOR FREEDOM AND PEACE.
TheServiceWeb 4 months ago
I love you
PajamaJay 4 months ago in playlist More videos from RKOwens4
Oil...it's what's for dinner.
Sather68 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
North Tower: How do 15 stories of a building crush 95 stories below them in 100% opposition to Newton's Third Law?
Newton's Third Law in action, 50% of the building destroys the other 50%: watch?v=syzKBBB_THE
Moreofthesamez 4 months ago
/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o
/watch?v=5qFsjdymqSk
megamogx 4 months ago
Loose change should have been called "loose theories". That fact it was made by a 20 something kid in his bedroom says it all.
22ness0hayden 4 months ago in playlist More videos from RKOwens4
@22ness0hayden Dylan Avery said it started as a work of fiction. It remains so to this day.
eaglejoe8 4 months ago
At the end of the day the perps of 911 won't get caught but so that you can get a good idea who the cast of characters is type the following into You Tube search and try not to vomit when you watch the video:
Israel's war, PNAC not oil took us to Iraq
Moreofthesamez 5 months ago
Just to clarify, I don't think the Truthers are calling the pilot a terrorist, in fact I think their whole point is that there were no terrorists involved. Kooky yes, but equally kooky is to insinuate anybody thought Burlingame was in league with Muslim whackos. Also, it should be noted that in the Moussawi trial record, the phone call that Olsen supposedly made from the plane was ZERO second long, meaning it never connected. I suggest omitting that point from your video.
KrabiSteve123 5 months ago
So... Even if it would be true, it would be incredible Coincidence? Not a surprise. :)
And then you try to make someone feel guilty for questioning.
Only because some family would not like that doesn't mean we should stop investigate.
Some serial killers family would not like it too... but that doesn't mean that peoples should stop investigate and put pictures on TV.
Some of "terrorists" wasn't even in planes and is or was alive after 9/11. How about their families?
KBendix 5 months ago
@KBendix I am sick of your conspiracy theorists, if you want a conspiracy, work on something other than 9/11. It happened, its done, its gone.
soldierboyz22 5 months ago
@soldierboyz22 I'm private investigator. Not very good one, but still...
You look more like conspiracy theorist. Everything that you don't like, yo call in some embarrassing word to make you feel better.
You watch some "9/11 inside job" videos... you feel bad. Then you search for "debunker" videos... and you feel good again. Then you read comments... FCK! You feel bad again, because KBendix can't just fck off! So you have to write some meaningless comment, to feel good again. :)
KBendix 5 months ago
@KBendix
YOU are Right, you are NOT a very good private investigator.
Private Investigators begin with EVIDENCE put into their hands.
You don't have ANYTHING in yours. You might as well do a Jim Carey,
and "Ass Talk" for the rest of the week.
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 How do you know what i have in my hands? :p
Only thing i see is that so called debunkers warp and twist info so they can fit it for their explanation (investigator side does it too... unfortunately). + they are trying to make other investigators feel bad for investigating.
Only because someone can make nice looking theory doesn't mean that his theory is true. And both sides should remember that.
KBendix 4 months ago
@KBendix
Oh please, you are just another Weenie bitch. The NIST and FEMA reports
are True, Accurate, and endorsed by major universities, major engineering orgs,
and even ENEMY (Russia and China) engineering organizations. JUST in the US,
that's 7 to 9 million engineers, and there are 70,000 NEW engineers graduating a
year in the US. YOU don't even review the FOREIGN independent investigations,
not to mention the US Science Magazines, Popular Mechanics, Nat Geo, or
120 Academic institutions.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@KBendix
I mean GEEZUS boy, you can't deny the math. Investigate all you want,
but don't start with the Assumption that a giant conspiracy based in the US,
attacked the US, in Midtown Manhattan, using invisible agents, secret
Weapons, and implanting explosives that magically disappear from the
debris pile, along with their batteries, wires, and radios.
That assumption is more Kooktard than the Investigation.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 Hm... it doesn't look like you have done lot of thinking.
It doesn't start with assumption. But looks like you start with it... like it is impossible for evil elements in government to do something like that.
And it is not even about possibility of that. It is about What If It turns Out To Be Truth.
Tell me... how likely it is to have fire in house? ~0,01%? But does it mean you don't fireproof you house?
So think about consequences of bad elements in governments if you don't prepare.
KBendix 4 months ago
@KBendix I don't think you are able to see the truth about science of humanity today. ~90% of scientists see only what they want to see. Things that make them feel good and convince them that they are one of the smartest beings in universe ever. That's why they hate so much theories about creation of human.
Most of technology making doesn't involve viewing world with 100% opened eyes.
Anything and anyone that they don't like, gets ridiculed. They have no credibility in my eyes.
KBendix 4 months ago
@KBendix
LMAO, I am able to see the Truth about Science and Humanity.
I am also able to count without a Tutorial, that makes me better than Twoofers.
That's why Engineers, Scientists, Mathematicians, Industry Manufacturers,
and big corporations have to baby sit conspiracy morons like yourself.
They are competent, Twoofers are NOT. You don't like Math Proofs, Engineer
Proofs, NIST or FEMA reports? Too bad for you, savage moron.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 You only think you are able to see the truth. You see only what you like to see. I can tell it by your manner. I have listened to both sides and i know that popular side always twists the information to fit their needs (if twisting is needed). They never confront opponents and, if they do, they constantly try to ruin debates and is trying to manipulate opponents psychologically.
There is peoples who disagree with me but we still have nice debates. Not like this troll thing you do.
KBendix 4 months ago
@KBendix
That's right there, Kooktard. I only see the truth in the US establishment explanation.
I only see LIES in you conspiracy theories. I think your politics suck ass, and it's
obvious you are so mad at the establishment you are ready to sling shit all over
yourself, and the 9/11 victims to assuage your rage at George Bush and the US.
SO, basically, why don't we just agree you can't add past your fingers,
and I can add ONE more finger for you.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 You like this, don't you? :p
I can't find any other explanation of your rage. You are so mad to those who talk about possibility of 9/11 inside job, because you don't like that they ruin your illusion of world, where you control your life and government is bad, but not THAT bad. The illusion of world, where elections is real deal and peoples is in charge. ...world where U.S. is best country in world and there is enemies only outside... not INSIDE.
I'm sorry to ruin your illusion.
KBendix 4 months ago
@KBendix You havent ruin anything bt your credibility whic you ont know what that means because you only believe those without credibility. I can ell you havent been to college because anyone who has takes communications classes in their first year and learns how to find credible information which truthers have none at all. Congradulations on gettingyour YouTube education now you can say, would you like fries with that, for the rest of your pathetic life.
db10001110101 4 months ago
@db10001110101 I don't believe. I'm not using believing at all in my life. I know or don't know. I don't say that i know about 9/11. Unlike guys like you.
And don't tell me about high school. It is one big brainwashing world wide system to make peoples like you and scientists like that majority who BELIEVE (and don't know) that 9/11 official story is true. It is very hard to get out of that brainwash, especially after finishing more than high school.
So it is hard to find credible info at all.
KBendix 4 months ago
@KBendix I didnt say hig school I said college cant you read? I love how you talk shoit about scientist and say they are brainwashed for looking at credible evidence and doing real research and not watching biased brainwashing films like you. You have to be a huge moron who couldnt make it in college. Good for you and your YouTube education kid. You dont know shit. Also your entire statement is wrong because any educated person know you cannot know everything about anything kid. Go to school
db10001110101 4 months ago
@db10001110101 It starts at high school. That's the problem. And it's not that much about looking at evidence. It's about ignoring it.
Most interesting thing is that you don't know a thing about me. Somehow I'm working together with university on one engineering project now. :p I know where they look at credible evidence, and when they don't. I didn't finish college. I was born with this moron thing called... THINKING. Couldn't take that brainwash anymore. Now i control what i do and when i do.
KBendix 4 months ago
@KBendix Yes high school and prooaganda films are both stupid and it takes an itelligent person to be able to wade through the bullshit. I am almost entirely self taught and read many books for knowledge. but you dont get it that you need to know how t look at credible evidnce and science isnt a conspiracy and saying itis shows you mut be a moron. I also think you are a liar because no university would hire a college drop out to work on an engineering project unless you are on clean up.
db10001110101 4 months ago
@KBendix What braniwashing couldnt you take? Was it when you would bring up your 9/11 truther fairy tale they told you to cited credile sources and when you cited loose chnage and got laughed at you got mad and quit saying I'm tired of this brainwashing when it is your side that is most quilty. Good luck with your YouTube education.
db10001110101 4 months ago
@db10001110101 Your so retard ill believe every single conspiracy theory if you can prove with facts that : American Airlines, United airlines, government, FDYN, FOX, CNN, ABC, Holographic planes,military,terrorists, the president, World trade center security, FDA, Pentagon, police, FBI, CIA, Bushes brother, Demolition teams, scientists, camera crews, eye witnesses, plane passengers, If you can prove all these people worked together to have 9/11 ill believe you but until then gtfo
Mikester1200 4 months ago
@Mikester1200 Hey retard I'm not a truther and dont believe any of these and you would know that if you could read. Damn you must be a moron. I dont believe any of that bullshit and none of my comments state that I do so you need to read comments before you post your bullshit.
db10001110101 4 months ago
@KBendix
There is no rage here, dogshit boy. I am just tired of having to listen to white trash
making believe they are Oppressed and under a dictatorship. Go find a REAL
dictatorship, and post on THEIR government run bulletin boards, and see how
long you last. May I suggest SYRIA or IRAN, or NORTH KOREA for you?
Sorry to ruin your illusion. Now go take a Gov college loan, and
get a real education, you are failing so far.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 You don't know a thing about Syria or Iran. Only thing is that you get from media. And there comes in your blind believing in things you like. N-Korea is better example. No one really knows what is going on there. I'm not saying that it is OK. But you don't know.
You better go out and try to talk about "9/11 inside job" in public in US, or try to paint bank on fire, or sell lemonade... will see what will happen to you.
Now it is excuses to arrest you. Soon it will turn in real deal.
KBendix 4 months ago
@KBendix
I know Syria and Iran are RIOTING to get the democracy you backstab like a fool.
THEY say so, not me. Libya, Lebannon, Tunisia, Egypt, and other Arab nations.
North Korea is STARVING, they have asked for European, Russian, Chinese,
and world help. Kim Jong II is going begging to the Russians NOW.
IN case you haven't visited a College Campus lately, there are more DEBUNKERS
than 9/11 Twoofers. That's been true for years.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 Your source of info is? You didn't go to Iran, Syria, N-Korea and didn't see it for yourself. It is media and government that tells you that. And you simply believe it. Look at chain of lies in Libya case.
As i explained before. It is about believing and not knowing. Unfortunately so called 9/11 truthers believes in most cases as well, and don't know.
All you have is only PLAUSIBLE (but not proven to be true) official theory about 9/11. That is what those debunkers BELIEVE in.
KBendix 4 months ago
@KBendix
Arab Websites, DUH. Including Al Jazeera in English, which posts here.
KIM ILL Jong is traveling in Russia this week to beg for food and assistance.
LIBYA has a chain of lies where? Their Rebel Government is already better
than Ghaddafi, and their soldiers wear civil clothes. I don't believe, I know
from the sources. You want Al Jazeera in English web site?
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 You wasn't there when Kim did that. You don't know if he did it like it is said he did or did it at all. You blindly believe in those info sources. Arab websites? So what? What makes them 100% true?
Looks like you are the one here who only listens to ONE side and dismiss alternative media. Look in other info sources and analyze it.
I'm not saying that those info sources is true, but you can get more info about Al'Qaeda in Libya, killings done by rebels and PROOF for that.
KBendix 4 months ago
@KBendix
I have been a member of Pilots4911 Twoof, and I joined, and was quickly kicked
out of other Twoofer websites also. They are a TOTAL fraud, buddy.
I pointed to Arab websites because they are NOT controlled by George Bush,
didn't you notice that? And I look at YOUR sources all the time, in fact,
I know the sources better than YOU do, including Al Qaeda websites
here in the US data centers. I have no doubt LIBYA will be a confusing
thing, but people don't give up on Democracy, fella.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@KBendix
It's impossible for evil elements to do something evil without leaving a trace.
YOU don't have any physical evidence, and neither does Twoofers worldwide.
SO, as I understand, all we have to do is wait for the Twoof to come out.
I am fine with that, when you die with the same lack of evidence in 40 years
or so, you will finally realize you have been an asshole for that long.
That's a nice life to live.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
Exactly, but you will see CT constantly ignoring evidence (cell phone tower logs) that prove the calls went though. Most of the calls were short in length, but calls were made.
Kyles45Angel 5 months ago
@Kyles45Angel CTers like to ignore facts, even when they slap them in the face.
eaglejoe8 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RKOwens you are a minority now.
michaelsterling37 5 months ago
First of all everyone knows your cell phone will not get any signal on the airplane 30,000 ft up. And thats 2001 technology. So how did the Pilot call his wife. The call was a forge over a somewhat stactically and poor volume audio clip. Second, men who work for the secret government agencies do not discuss their work with their wives and family. Of course the family didnt know anything.
askiaf 5 months ago
@askiaf Yes cell phones did work. The calls were dropped quickly, but they still worked. Most of the calls that were any length were from in flight phones. Stop spreading lies.
Kyles45Angel 5 months ago
@Kyles45Angel Not to mention, most cell calls were made at lower altitudes. There is also an account from a passenger on Delta flight 1989, which was originally thought to be a highjacked flight, where one of the passengers was repeatedly making calls on his phone.
eaglejoe8 5 months ago
charles burlingame is still alive,he faked his death
1123359 5 months ago
the pilot of flight 77 worked for the c.i.a.,he faked his death
1123359 5 months ago
@1123359 No he didn't and no he didn't.
You're a moron.
cantonear1968 5 months ago
@cantonear1968 you are moron,you dont even know the secret operations they do in the c.i.a. and the pentagon,you are foolish person,you are a slave to the u.s. government and you live in debt,wake up,the u.s. government is fooling us,watch this video,its about how america went from freedom to facism:
/watch?v=lUpZhhbKUBo
1123359 5 months ago
@1123359 If they're secret operations, how do you know about them?
I am awake, thank you very much!
Fascism? Really? You've had the right to vote taken away?
cantonear1968 5 months ago
@cantonear1968 how do we know about them? are you dumb?didnt you hear wikileaks release over 90,000 documents of secret documents of the u.s. government?
1123359 5 months ago
@1123359 And did wikileaks name Burlingame as a CIA agent? Again, wikileaks notwithstanding, how do you know about secret operations if their secret? If wikileaks exposes it, it's no longer a secret. If it hasn't, then it's a secret and you are simply making things up!
So again, did wikileaks name Burlingame as a CIA operative? Or did you just make that up?
cantonear1968 5 months ago
@cantonear1968 /watch?v=daxnUMUnolc&NR=1 learn about the bloodlines
1123359 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1123359 "you are moron,you don't even know the secret operations they do in the c.i.a. and the pentagon". And you do?
trekfanful 5 months ago
@Stealth9331 no. who can be bothered! lol good luck
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
"Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.”
Why defend tyranny? Why defend the corrupt? Why not fix this mess. We have some very sick people loose in our government. They have some very destructive control issues. psychopathic. homicidal. cut military spending. get rid of the CIA. and put money into science. alternative, renewable energy. why support a group of greedy monsters? Let's move forward, no?
jerjr49 5 months ago
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”-Joseph Goebbels
jerjr49 5 months ago
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
jerjr49 5 months ago
Damn, this is deep...
MURRxOEx951 5 months ago
not true. a lie. The Open Chemical Physics Journal ISSN: 1874-4125. discovery of "live" nanothermite. they can "explode" it. evidence is they used a lot of it. as in tons of it. your readers should go read it. not you. you're a waste. btw. this is not gonna go away. better find a scapegoat quick. maybe wait until Cheney dies and blame it all on him. good luck with that.
jerjr49 6 months ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?
If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?
ctcole77 5 months ago
that's all diversionary BS. the FACT is that the buildings were demolished. fundamental laws of physics. simply put no structure can descend uniformly without an external force weakening the supporting structure. all s WTC bldngs. fell uniformly. WTC#7? Please. NTC FINALLY had to admit to free fall.in doing so they admitted to CD. no building can fall at free fall in a perfectly symmetrical fashion across 300' width without the use of explosives.physically impossible. why defend greedy monsters?
jerjr49 5 months ago
@jerjr49
So asking questions is "diversionary BS"?
What "fundamental laws of physics" were broken on 911? Please list the actual laws and how they were broken. Feel free to include equations and calculations.
Oh yeah the WTC fell soooooo uniformly into its own footprint that it destroyed/damaged WTC 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 20 other surrounding buidlings!
911 WAS AN OUTSIDE JOB!
ctcole77 5 months ago
@ctcole77 give up. seriously
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
@drewsiboberinski
WHY WON'T 911 TWOOFERS ANSWER THE QUESTIONS?
WHAT ARE THEY AFRAID OF?
DEMAND A NEW INVESTIGATION OF 911 TWOOF!
MAKE 911 TWOOFERS DO SOMETHING THEY HAVE NEVER DONE BEFORE: TELL THE TRUTH!
ctcole77 5 months ago
@ctcole77 what are you afraid of? you are behind the times.
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
@ctcole77 Lost & Unaccounted for in Iraq - $9 billion of US taxpayers' money and $549.7 milion in spare parts shipped in 2004 to US contractors. Also, per ABC News, 190,000 guns, including 110,000 AK-47 rifles.
Lost and Reported Stolen - $6.6 billion of U.S. taxpayers' money earmarked for Iraq reconstruction, reported on June 14, 2011 by Special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction Stuart Bowen who called it "the largest theft of funds in national history." (Source - CBS News)
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
Respond to this video... Missing - $1 billion in tractor trailers, tank recovery vehicles, machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and other equipment and services provided to the Iraqi security forces. (Per CBS News on Dec 6, 2007.)
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
Respond to this video... Mismanaged & Wasted in Iraq - $10 billion, per Feb 2007 Congressional hearings
Halliburton Overcharges Classified by the Pentagon as Unreasonable and Unsupported - $1.4 billion
Amount paid to KBR, a former Halliburton division, to supply U.S. military in Iraq with food, fuel, housing and other items - $20 billion
Portion of the $20 billion paid to KBR that Pentagon auditors deem "questionable or supportable" - $3.2 billion
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
Respond to this video... U.S. Annual Air-Conditioning Cost in Iraq and Afghanistan - $20.2 billion (Source - NPR, June 25, 2011)
U.S. 2009 Monthly Spending in Iraq - $7.3 billion as of Oct 2009
U.S. 2008 Monthly Spending in Iraq - $12 billion
U.S. Spending per Second - $5,000 in 2008 (per Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on May 5, 2008)
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
Respond to this video... Cost of deploying one U.S. soldier for one year in Iraq - $390,000 (Congressional Research Service)
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
Respond to this video... Troops in Iraq - Total 46,000 U.S. troops. All other nations have withdrawn their troops.
U.S. Troop Casualties - 4,469 US troops; 98% male. 91% non-officers; 82% active duty, 11% National Guard; 74% Caucasian, 9% African-American, 11% Latino. 19% killed by non-hostile causes. 54% of US casualties were under 25 years old. 72% were from the US Army
Non-U.S. Troop Casualties - Total 316, with 179 from the UK
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@drewsiboberinski
PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
ctcole77 5 months ago
@drewsiboberinski Imagine that!! Casualties in a war!? Say it ain't so!!!
trekfanful 5 months ago
@trekfanful OMG another cold hearted american cunt LOL go fuck your self liberally
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
Respond to this video... Private Contractors in Iraq, Working in Support of US Army Troops - More than 180,000 in August 2007, per The Nation/LA Times.
Journalists killed - 148, 97 by murder and 51 by acts of war
Journalists killed by US Forces - 14
Iraqi Police and Soldiers Killed - 9,950 as of Jan 31, 2011
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
@drewsiboberinski
PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
ctcole77 5 months ago
Respond to this video... work it out dumbo american. Let's see if you can join the dots....I bet you can't because you are a fuck'n dumb american...i can't wait LOL
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@drewsiboberinski
PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
ctcole77 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@drewsiboberinski
PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
ctcole77 5 months ago
@drewsiboberinski
PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
ctcole77 5 months ago
@drewsiboberinski
PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
ctcole77 5 months ago
@ctcole77 you = out dated dumb american....what a joke!
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
"Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane. I think an American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass and it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"
- "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
ctcole77 5 months ago
@ctcole77 you're cutting and pasting without thinking dumb american...OMG lol
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
@drewsiboberinski
Because you keep REFUSING to answer the questions.
I don't get it. You claim to be searching for the truth, but avoid any questions that refute your magical theories.
ctcole77 5 months ago
@ctcole77 dumb and dumber. blind american. fuck you're a joke. really! welcome to 2011
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
@drewsiboberinski
"Aydan Kizildrgli, an English language student who is a native of Turkey, saw the jetliner bank slightly then strike a western wall of the huge five-sided building that is the headquarters of the nation's military. 'There was a big boom,' he said. 'Everybody was in shock. I turned around to the car behind me and yelled "Did you see that?" Nobody could believe it.'"
- "Bush Vows Retaliation for 'Evil Acts'." USA Today, 11 Sep 2001
ctcole77 5 months ago
@ctcole77 are you for real? OMG another dumb american lol
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
@drewsiboberinski Why don't you foreigners stop worrying about how dumb you think americans are or complaining about the way my country is run. We sure as hell don't think about you pseudo-europeans down under.
trekfanful 5 months ago
@trekfanful how about you go and fuck your self dumb american cunt!
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
@drewsiboberinski Actually I must apologize. I "spoke" without thinking. We do give thought to second rate nations whenever we are looking for a good vacation spot.
trekfanful 5 months ago
@trekfanful get me a bucket
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@drewsiboberinski
PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
ctcole77 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@drewsiboberinski
PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
ctcole77 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@drewsiboberinski
PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
ctcole77 5 months ago
Respond to this video...I'd rather know the "truth" than be a sheep.
drewsiboberinski 5 months ago
How much do you get paid to do this? Can you say cognitive infiltration? If not familiar this is a technique of suppressing conspiracy theories that Regulatory & Information Czar Cass Sunstein proposed in 2008. Google it. Back to you. Thousands of architects, engineers, physicists, chemists, pilots, etc. put their careers & credibility on the line? They need attention? LOL. Think of the consequences of this false flag op and then go locate your soul. THEN do the right thing. Do it for your kids.
jerjr49 6 months ago
@jerjr49 And yet, not one of those thousands of "scientists" has produced a single paper for peer review....you've been duped
lumpheadthump 6 months ago
@jerjr49 Can you say "fucked in the head"?
EvilStar109 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TO DATE theres isnt 1 PIC OR VID that even shows a commercial airliner used on 9/11! its ASTONISHING!! missing plane at pentagon and the 4th that 'melted in a field (shot down), the only footage of the 1st plane hitting wtc is a blur, there are NUMEROUS SHOTS of the 2nd plane hit wtc, but not one shows the colours/tail of an AA or UA jet, they have all been altered, if you watch closely you can make out a blue/white tail! THAT IS NOT A PASSENGER JET!! Watch 'september clues' on YT! 9/11's a lie
wellifthemediasaysit 6 months ago
Excuse me while I go to the bathroom and take a 9/11 conspiracy theorist.
Vikeman23 7 months ago
majority of these vids all slammed in griffins book The New Pearl Harbor
Halo3SpartanY46 7 months ago
did you know that obstruction of justice makes one an accessory to the
crime after the fact? covering up 9/11 made bush a murderer. covering up
the fact that AIDS was spread by vaccines makes a lot of people guilty of
murder, including the pharmaceutical companies that caused it in the first
place. did you know that AIDS is the only weapon the neo-cons have in their
arsenal of propaganda and they use the disease to herd people into the
war camp on a regular basis?
TheModerator79 7 months ago
The poles where not struck by the plane. I have a friend of a friend that works at the NTSB and she said that the plane was on the oppossite side of the gas station as the pole. Even the taxi driver said he lied about the poles, his wife works for the FBI. Many witnesses say differently as well.
doughauf 7 months ago
@timedmil Search for "911 military exercises". The first link should be a Wikipedia page. Click on it. The only hijacking exercise being run was a traditional one. While similar exercises had been conducted in the past, there was none in operation on Sept. 11th, 2001.
EGRJ 8 months ago
Despite Hanjour's poor reviews, he did have some ability as a pilot, said chief flight instructor Marcel Bernard of Freeway Airport. "There's no doubt in my mind that once that [hijacked jet] got going, he could have pointed that plane at a building and hit it."
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
ctcole77 7 months ago
@ctcole77 I've heard pilots on JREF say they managed to get untrained people--including children--to hit the WTC and Pentagon pretty consistently in a flight simulator. It wouldn't be that hard.
EGRJ 7 months ago
my brother was in the navy very proud of my bro very smart person too and t most of alla very good christian this country is blessed to have him.
dagnaste01 8 months ago
go watch another movie
dagnaste01 8 months ago
a plane did hit the penagon idiot , when u finally find that out why dont u say we americans did it
dagnaste01 8 months ago
@dagnaste01 i agree a plane did hit the pentagon..but it was not a commercial airliner..
Coachrob36 7 months ago
as a VERY patriotic american old school conserative, ronald reagan was our last great president sad to say, that said if u dont vote because u say there isnt anyboedy to vote for well your right but like my dad always told me "to many ppl died for my right to vote for me not to vote" mr.bright. if u dont like whos runnin go vote for your self atleast, yes this goverment is in shambles to say the least and untill u ppl stop voting the same ppl in there will be no change go vote for who isnt run
dagnaste01 8 months ago
A plane did not hit the Pentagon.
IranContraScumDid911 8 months ago
Hello Agent Smith of the CIA!
TheRSBreaker 8 months ago
just wanna point out that nowhere did the words of the loose change narrator say that the pilot was a TERRORIST. also the phone call stating that the pilots were in the back with other passengers makes no sense since it been said that hijackers killed other pilots so why would they leave those alive, also if they were alive why no retailation like in the flight 93 case of trying to get the plane back. makes sense if u have the pilot STILL alive to fly for u.
storrent1 8 months ago
@storrent1 united 93 was hijacked late and crashed late.......by then it became apparent that the terroists werent letting any of the passengers out due to the incidents in new york and at the pentagon so they fought back.......here none of the passengers were aware and i also believe on flight 77 there were more hijackers then on 93 so maybe they did fight back just not in time
TheRe5crossbow 8 months ago
I am lost here I thought the Truth movement says that NO PLANE hit the pentagon, so why would they say the pilot of said flight was a terrorist??? USA is all mixed up. they need an independent international investigation on the whole incident from scratch. BUT due to the high level of corruption in the Us this would be impossible as they would need the US Gov't to be impartial and support the inquiry..which would not happen....so sad
WELLBRAN 8 months ago
@WELLBRAN No they don't need a new investigation. The only assholes who are changing their story and adjusting their version of events due to lack of evidence are the conspiracy theorists. No amount of investigation will satisfy these shitdicks because its not about finding out what actually happened, its about the thrill of feeling like they could be the ones to blow the lid off of a major govt conspiracy, no matter how many times they get proven wrong or have their theories shit all over.
poopstainmcgoo 8 months ago 2
@WELLBRAN The truthers can't keep their story straight. They claim the evidence is "obvious", yet can't even say whether the Pentagon was hit by a missile, a fighter, a military transport plane, a mocked-up jet, or remote-controlled Flight 77. Much less their studious avoidance of the question of how the thousands of explosives in WTC1/2/7 were planted and not noticed by ~500,000 people passing through the buildings daily, along with other holes in their claims.
EGRJ 7 months ago
@EGRJ Of course they can't keep their stories straight. Half the truthers believe Flight 93 was shot down, and the other half believe it landed in Cleveland. If it landed in Cleveland, where are the passengers? And the plane? If it was shot down, why would the government lie about it? Considering that 3 other planes hit their targets, a shoot down, while being a tough decision to make, would show the government made a last ditched effort to protect us.
eaglejoe8 6 months ago
@eaglejoe8 uh sorry, i call bullshit. no 757 hit the pentagon, show me proof of it, and look at a normal plane crash, there is debris everywhere, flight 93? all over the damn place away from the impact zone, meaning it was crumbling apart before its crash. now thats my theory. now you get me a video, ill say wow im sorry. i was stupid, till then. nobody is right.
stingray8881 6 months ago
@stingray8881 There was debris at the Pentagon. A simple Google search will show you this. And normal plane crashes don't happen by going into a reinforced concrete building at very high speeds. As for Flight 93, the only debris away from the crash site were lightweight pieces of papers or fibers, or very small metal pieces. Had it been shot down, there would have been debris found in the flight path, as it was, the secondary debris fields were in the direction the wind was going.
eaglejoe8 6 months ago
@eaglejoe8 okay, your telling me the flight 93 crash looked like a regular crash? just look up plane wrecks. its a Boeing 757 jet. its massive, and some how it was doing way over its operating limit. not to mention the pentagon it one of the most heavily surveillanced places in the USA.
stingray8881 6 months ago
@stingray8881 There have been other crashes that at first sight, look like no plane crashed. But the fact of the matter is, id did crash where it is said to have crashed. 95% of the plane was recovered, and everyone on board was identified. The onus of proof that it landed/crashed elsewhere is on you. Good luck.
As for the Pentagon, do you really think every camera is going to be pointed at exactly the point of impact? Security camers are low resolution, and only record 1 frame per second.
eaglejoe8 6 months ago
@eaglejoe8 okay, then what about the gas station cameras, the hotel/apartment cameras? the highway cameras? and even if they were 1 frame per second. there are still different angles of the approach ? ive been there. ive been to the memorial site. the plane would have been caught by many cameras. and was. but since whats on thoes tapes, is why they wont release then, explain why it to 5 years to release 5 frames? if a plane did hit? why take that long? to make sure you didnt see anything.
stingray8881 6 months ago
@stingray8881 Believe me, there was a point in time when I questioned a lot of this myself. As it was first explainedto me, security tapes loop, and eventually record over themselves which explains why they were confiscated so quickly. Most cameras are also going to record their own property, not the building across the street, but they're taken on the off chance that they show SOMETHING. Most didn't record anything worth noting. Also, even though the tapes were taken, and shown at the Moussaoui
eaglejoe8 6 months ago
@eaglejoe8 the hotel across the street recorded it. the staff sat there in shock to what they were watching. then, here comes the FBI. and no your wrong. a staff of then 9/11 commission janice kepart i think, last names probably spelled wrong., even said the government has a huge deal for secrecy, witch means there still hiding the truth from you and me. other wise that wouldn't of been said, and what about rumsfelds sip of the tongue, saying flight 93 was shot down?
stingray8881 6 months ago
@stingray8881 Rumsfeld obviously misspoke. Think about this logically. If FL93 were shot down, why would the government deny it? If 911 was an inside job, why would they not allow FL93 to hit it's target? In light of the fact that 3 other airplanes hit their targets, shooting down FL93 would show the gov'ment was doing what they could to protect us, so there'd be no reason to deny it. Shooting down FL93 is a direct contradiction to the "inside job" theory.
eaglejoe8 6 months ago
@eaglejoe8 it was going to the white house right? im not saying a pissed off Arabian wasn't flying that plane. but if it were going to the white house, they would have shot it down. the twin towers and such, nobody will ever know. its a cover up. you say its going to the white house to cause panic. then it crashes. hm. the part of the pentagon blown up to hide trillions of missing money, nobody ever talks about that September 10th conference again, and i am right on that.
stingray8881 6 months ago
@stingray8881 Wait a second. You're saying a "pissed off Arabian" was flying the plane, and it was likely headed to the WH, and the government had it shot down? By your own words, that is a direct contradiction to being an inside job. Unless you expect me to believe the other 3 events that day were all done by the government, but at the same time, some "pissed off Arabian" had planned to do the exact same thing. That makes no sense at all, and it still doesn't explain why the government would...
eaglejoe8 6 months ago
@eaglejoe8 okay you explain why there is such a wide range of debris. the pentagon was obviously struck to hide a massive money scam. but then again, you cant really prove me wrong. because there was isnt any proof. but for me, i can say what i look at cant be right.
stingray8881 6 months ago
@stingray8881 Guess again chief. I just did prove you wrong.
eaglejoe8 6 months ago
@eaglejoe8 what did you prove me wrong about ? there was obviously something wrong with flight 93s crash. there are eye witness reports to it. and the pentagon? i mean damn. so many stories. so many '' debunkers'' but yet.. i still have nothing to refer to. no video. nothing.
stingray8881 6 months ago
@stingray8881 I proved you wrong on the idea that the Pentagon was "blown up" to hide trillions of dollars lost. And since you've already acknowledged that a "pissed off Arabian" was flying FL93, it's illogical to assume none of the other flights were, which renders the rest of your points moot.
eaglejoe8 6 months ago
@eaglejoe8 i was talking about the recordings from the black box. if flight 93 wasnt shot down, why was the debris scattered ? no bodies found. just bits and pieces of debris? explain on why its not a normal crash site. and second. there are highway cameras, 1 over looking both sides of the highway plus the side of the building hit. where the hell is that footage? don't tell me it didn't catch anything. your obviously brainwashed. and listen to who is lying about it all?
stingray8881 6 months ago
@stingray8881 Uh, you're wrong there guy. Everyone onboard FL93 was identified through DNA. You're second mistake is thinking that every crash site leaves recognizable debris. A little research would show you that not to be the case. It's rare, but does happen. If you want to believe highway cameras are put in lace to watch the Pentagon, and not, you know, the highway, then I can't help you. And Loose Change? I've seen it. It's a hack film and has been debunked.
eaglejoe8 6 months ago
@eaglejoe8 i didn't say it wasn't flight 93. im just saying for scattered debris ranging up to 42000 feet away, the crash isnt ''normal''. per say. and yes highway cams watch the highway. but the plane would have past right by it showing impact?
stingray8881 6 months ago
@stingray8881 The debris that was found to be 8 miles away was said to be small pieces of paper, and light weight fibers. Items that can be blown into the air by the explosion on impact, and easily be carried away by the 10MPH wind that was blowing in the exact direction it was found. As for the cameras. Again, they're low resolution, and film as a rate of 1 frame /second. Effective for catching objects like cars or people, but not effective for catching a much faster moving object going 500MPH.
eaglejoe8 6 months ago