the western media never shows footage of dead people on television--the nature of the tragedy is irrelevant. I know they're generally pro-military overall but that isn't why dead bodies weren't shown.
ok for starters helicopters are not used for airstrikes(fact1). if they were involved for support they would be attack helicopters such as the cobra or apache and not the blackhawk or pavehawks(fact2) . if a strike like this happened the first weapon of choice would be a drone/UAV and the second would be a fighter strike example f-16's launching from a base in iraq(fact3).And to add to the story, the U.N. sec. council ruled it is acceptable for the U.S to strike any target in any country anytime
Syria is aiding insurgents in Iraq !!!!!! what American are doing in Iraq stiling oil for free and their smelly stupid ignorant soldier raping innocent iraqi girl you have to understand USA no more superpower
this topical cowboy mentality,amarican are parasitic nation ,i hop you have a bad economy and china finish it jops ass hol mcdanifucker go and lick your mother pussy or smell your dog's assholl or eat at MCSHIT
I'm not Protestant. I'm not even religious. I can't wait to see Demascus turned to glass. Your words will get you killed some day, you hateful fuck. It's just like when your terrorists killed those people outside the US Embassy back in the 80's, then blamed it on us. Syria can lick my nutsack.
Syria is aiding insurgents in Iraq, as well as attempting to develop nuclear capabilities. Syria has been caught with it's pants down on several occasions. Now, as the US engages your terrorists, you say WE started it? Fuck you Syria.
why didn't u ask syria to kill these terrorists first and if they didn't respond u go and kill them. then till now there is no single tiny evidence that the people were killed were terrorists or syria owned or trying to own nuclear facilities or weapons. so shut up u american machine that obeys everything fox news tells u and go, and pay ur taxes to an army that invades countries like pigs.
How you dare to speak about nuclear stuff. Instead of carrying the shame of hiroshima and nagasaki. You are just nuts.
Syria has been the most stable country in the area for many decades. now USA is looking for another cool excuse. What is it going to be now? Cause the Weapns of Mass Destruction is already taken.
yeah, and you probably have them too! FUCKING PEICE OF SHIT. I'll find out where you live, and toss a grenade into your fucking house. GO FUCK YOURSELF!
Well obviously "Western" media are going to use 'allegation' qualifiers. It makes sense when you don't have reporters in the field and your sources are either in the US Government or the Syrian State TV.
Wow. From what I'd always been told, Al Jazeera was a radically biased network. This was quality, balanced reporting. This reminds me of what I used to see on American media when I was little. I might have to start tuning in. In the United States, our news is disgracefully biased. Thank you for honesty.
Hi, welcome to aljazeera! I love aljazeera for the same reason. The way they report things is very balanced, and the Listening Post is one of my favourite programme
Thank you Al Jazeera for providing us in the US with an outlet for this reporting that is kept censored in this country. One day, hopefully sooner than later the real truth will replace the "no comments" that we are getting from the administration.
People don't forget the reasonthe US media is like this is becuase they are talking to thier demographic audience who just doesn'tare about the news at all! And it is a very illiterate stupid,mono-lingual mono-cultural audience! they can't even find Syria on the Map! And please don't giveme this they voted for Obama stuff, they voted for Obamabecause they lovd his GQ looks. Simple!
noting will change from the west their lies will go on and rest of world will just follow becuase the white man is more truthful then the arab muslim or muslim as whole.thats why its easy for most ppl around world to leave their culter and faith because white man faith and culter is better then your own culter and faith.ppl of color are sheeps as always, histroy have show always.
Which government has killed more innocent civilians in Syria? Israel, the USA, or the Syrian regime itself? The Syrian regime itself, of course, by far. And did the Syrian news media cover any of the thousands and thousands of Syrian civilians killed by the Syrian regime? You know, when the good people of color of the Syrian regime killed the civilian people of color of Syria? I can't wait for your answer.
yeah right, does that include USA civilian causalties? What about USA friendly fire on ally troops? The Americans are the true Terrorist!!
Its about time the big USA bully be seen for the Global Terrorist Regime that it truely is. Oh no, let's hope they don't come and "Liberate" us too. Know you facts before you open you trap you dumbass!
Obviously you are completely ignorant of the history of the Syrian regime's wholesale slaughter of the Syrian people. Probably you also are totally ignorant of the Syrian regime's murderous activities in Lebanon. You see the world through the prism of irrational anti Americanism. Every evil in the world isn't the responsibility of America. Know you facts before you open you trap you dumbass!
Hmm..let's look at it this way. How many military bases does Syria have over the world? zero. How many military bases does the Terrorist American troops have? Japan, Cuba, Guam, Korea just to name a few. Who feels that it's in their divine right to internationally police the world? Just because they have the most advanced military? Who invaded Iraq for oil? Who also violated the UN Charter & Geneva Convention ACT? America is the true rouge terrorist state with numerous violations globally.
Syria, which is an impoverished country due to its government's dedication to militarism and fascism, is not a world power. America, a world power, saved Europe from self destruction in 1945 and saved China from Japanese militarism, as well. Some country is going to police the world. Leading candidates like China and Russia are much too genocidal. China's genocide in Cambodia and Russia's genocide in Chechnya prove that.
may i ask what are you talking about when you say "syrian regime's genocide of its own people" .. if you mean the bombing of hama, then you are missing the fact that in it there was a terrorist group called the islamic brotherhood which has bombed and killed so many civilians in syria prior to the incident, so it was meerely and attempt to stop terrorism, was it tough yes was it necessary? absolutely.. if it wasn't for that syria would be in ruins
well actually they didn't level down the whole city.. they told islamic brootherhood members to come out but they didn't then they told the people that live in hama to get out because they're going to bomb it.. so the people that stayed in harboring terrorists died unfortunately but the terrorists were ousted for good .. again was it a tough decision? yes but what's more important citizen's lives or terrorists'?
No, that will change soon with the downfall of the American Empire. China will rise and collect ALL that money that is owed to them by the USA. When will the Americans learn that violence & intimidation of lesser countries does not work. Look at China and how they prosper by establishing DIPLOMATIC relations with Africa, very different from American imperialism. Thats why they have propaganda news like FOX NEWS to dumb down the population of USA as if they weren't dumb enough already!
Does China's support for the genocide of the Darfur Sudanese qualify in your mind as a good example of Chinese relations with Africa? Maybe in your mind selling advanced weaponry to a genocidal regime like Sudan's qualifies as a DIPLOMATIC move. It's obvious you yourself need less dumbing down before criticizing the population of the USA.
blazing saddles all over again , until a zionest got the job as sectary of state (to be known as the "post for/and of israel rectum licking ),bow to your master israel the despot clinton , you think he give the job to some one who put the US first , , but i digress
yes corruption of the media is a huge problem , the truth will set you free :)
The western media is part of the military amoury of attack on foriegn nations and the US military is so large, criminals can move within it with impunity.
The Syrian puppet government wanted to silence Islamic renegades in their own country but they did not think the Americans would be so indiscriminate in regards to the civilians involved in the attack.
Syria I'm going to give you the same message we gave Pakistan; We love your country but if you allow our enemies to hide there....there will be blood.
What racism, what hypocracy that white reporters will not confirm anythign as fact unlessit comes froma white source, that is the definition of racism and bigotry.
Middle-eastern individuals criticizing western media for spinning there report more in the favor of west is the definition of hypocrisy.
Many middle-eastern news outlets are state owned. Nearly every middle eastern news report goes to insane lengths to vilify the US and Israel and show victimization of Muslims.
Watch link TV here on You-tube if you don't believe me.
This particular outlet is not state owned and has fair enough coverage that they can criticize western media. What percentage of people in the west believe Russia attacked Georgia as opposed to people in the middle east?
Probably 99% of Americans believe Russia attacked Georgia when the truth is Georgian troops and tanks crossed into South Ossetia at midnight local time August the 8th when russia only had peacekeeping troops in the country. Even with state controlled media the Middle East is probably more informed than the people who watch mainstream news in the US.
Watch Link TV's report they are 30 min long free and right here on YouTube they cover a variety of Arab news channels. Watch link for a week and tell me if you still think your last statement is true.
The assertion that Russia was in the right and Georgia was in the wrong is false and you know it. The situation is very muddled with both sides having a great deal of fault.
I watch linktv and Mosaic all the time. Whether it was muddled or not and who is most at fault is not the issue. The issue is that main stream media reported this as a Russian attack on Georgia and did not give any facts about the muddled situations so they are misinformed. Just look at US coverage of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. Israel creates atrocities in an illegal occupation against international law and when retaliated against the US claims Israel is acting in self defense.
I have never claimed western media is perfect. Only that it is nominally better than middle Eastern media. The fact that you know what is going on proves our system works. You are not restricted to any one source. Many middle easterners are.
People in the Middle East with only state run media at least know they are getting propaganda. In the US there is an illusion of freedom of the press that fools a lot of people into thinking they are watching news when they are only getting infotainment at the very least and usually heavily spun news that is worse than propaganda. The cable news networks produce propaganda geared towards their key demographics so you only get to choose your brand of propaganda.
I have heard this argument before and i think it is totally ridiculas.
You want to tell me people that have grown up with one state controlled media outlet there whole life. People that live in poverty with a poor education are going to believe that the only news they know is propaganda?
The fact that Iran can still get hundreds of thousands of people to waist there weekend chanting Death to America 30 years after the revolution challenges your claim.
You assume it is state media that gets Iranians into the streets. Iran has access to western media. Could it be operation Ajax and the Ruthless puppet that we put in power because he was US and British corporate friendly and terrorized and tortured his people for decades?
So you don't think 30 years is long enough to become the state promised by the revolution? I know Iran has limited access to outside media. Iran's state media has the same power as the corporate media in America to focus public opinion. A power used by the state to turn public opinion away from internal problems. Blaming America and Israel is Iran way of dealing with a system that has serious flaws.
All governments use scapegoats to distract the population. Do Iranians have a real reason to be angry at the US? The CIA along with the British bombed civilians in Iran and blamed it on the democratically elected president who was nationalizing the oil. Then they installed the Shah and trained his secret police in CIA torture techniques that were used very effectively against dissenters and Iranian oil once again benefited the corporations and not the people. Operation ajax has been declassified
Why do you insist on telling me information i already know?
Why don't you just answer my questions?
Don't you think 30 years is long enough to become the state promised by the revolution? What is the benefit of living in the past? Did the US have anti british rallies 30 after the revolution? No we celebrated our revolution and our independence. Its obvious that there system is flawed and undemocratic hate mongering is there only was to secure there power base.
So you knew that but don't know that Iran has had other reasons since the revolution to be angry at America? If Iran seized US assets and put most of their navy and nuclear weapons off our coast because we wanted nuclear power and had signed the non proliferation treaty but Iran let Pakistan, India, Israel and other countries develop nuclear weapons without signing the treaty you would be OK with that I suppose?
Wouldn't it be nice for you if the world was in black and with like that? The US has tried with very little success to stop all nuclear proliferation. When you insist on putting an idiot like Ahmajenidad as the mouthpiece of your country then don't be surprised when people start taking some of his crazy comment to heart. The US is far from being alone in wanting to sanction Iran. Many other middle eastern countries are talking about starting a nuclear program because they are afraid of Iran.
What crazy comments? 10 bucks says you don't have an accurate translation from Farsi of anything Ahmajenidad said. You did however correctly state him as a mouthpiece. He does not have the authority to toss a rock at another country. War is declared by the supreme leader with consent of the Guardian council. The same supreme leader that begged Bush to negotiate a peace deal with Israel and offered to put everything on the table in 2002. Cont.
My factual assertion that many European country see Iran as a threat is totally relevant. Your portrayal of Iran as Tiny Tim is whats fucking lame. Your undermining your credibility as a rational person putting Iran on this moral pedestal when you know they support terrorist all over the world. Or how about the morals of there glorious leader in the Iran Iraq war sending brainwashed young boys with no training and hardly any weapons to be slaughtered overrunning Iraqi machine gun nests.
The leaders in Iran belong to a strict sect of Shia that believe they will go to hell if they kill innocent people. Zero tolerance for collateral damage. Why did they not use chemical weapons after Iraq used them against them even though they had them? Even if they want a bomb and any country that has oil and gas should get a bomb as a deterrent to having it taken by the US it would likely be used just for that. With one bomb they could take out one city and cont.
They hang Islamic people who violate Islamic law. You can't in my opinion extrapolate that to mean they are crazy enough to ensure their complete annihilation to kill a few Jews.
No they hang people that renounce Islam. Do you know the definition of apostasy?
The 12th Imam is a totally different argument. I guess you have never heard of it. Might do some research on what your glorious leaders really believes.
For awhile you seemed to at least be trying to make rational arguments. Now you are just trying to be as creative as possible at weaseling out of addressing anything I say. I don't play with my own children and am certainly not going to play with someone elses. If you are out of arguments please do me the courtesy of not wasting any more of my time.
I don't believe they would do a preemptive nuclear strike on israel but i do believe they would use more bullying tactics to cohere there neighbors. You are one talk about weaseling out of answering questions. You have addressed less than half of my questions and none of the relevant ones.
You just wasted an enormous amount of my time with how dangerous Iran was. Now you say they could maybe get some neighbors to help bully them. Sunni Muslims don't have a habit of cooperating with Shia. You ignore my most relevant questions and statements and pick just one out each comment and answer or comment on it in a way usually designed to change the subject away from the most relevant part of my comment. I have been on yt for over two years and this is not my first rodeo with a pundit.
I apologize for being rude. I get irritated when GMAIL notifier pops up so much that I can't get anything done but that is my problem and not yours. Bottom line is we are not getting anywhere and it does not look like that is going to change so it makes sense to me to call it quits.
minutes later they would cease to exist. What makes you think they are that crazy? If they hate Jews so much why are so many Jews living in Iran unmolested and are even allowed to hold positions in government? You are parroting propaganda and trying to make a case that western media is better than other media at not presenting propaganda.
25,000 Jews in the 70 million population of Iran. Wow there is a huge population of Jews in Iran. Iran has problems with Sunni terrorists in its own county and has been criticized for persecution of non Persians Zoroaster and every one else not within there narrowly defined fascist ideal.
You are suggesting they would launch a nuclear bomb and kill maybe a city of Jews knowing Israel would launch hundred against them. If they hated Jews enough to have their country wiped out to kill a few it seems like they would start at home.
2. The US had no problem with Pakistan or Israel developing nuclear weapons and just signed a deal to give enriched uranium to India which has not signed a proliferation treaty. Your excuse for other people want to sanction them too is so fucking lame and you are absolutely undermining your argument that people in the west are more informed that people with only state media.
100 buck says i have seen Arab translations on Arab news channels with Ahmajenidad saying some one needs to wipe Israel off the map. I have seen Link broadcasts with him say crazy shit like he was engulfed in holy light at the UN while speaking and that the Holocaust never happened. I remember every one in the Gov. freakin out then Pakistan got the nuke so that is wrong. India and Israel are stable Allies we had more to lose than gain by confronting them.
The translation from Farsi is "The zionist regime should disappear from the pages of time". Zionism is a secular movement (religious Jews are forbidden from going to Israel by the Torah) that has a history of killing Arabs and stealing their land. Not surprised myself they are not loved in the middle east. Nuclear triggers of plutonium have to be replaced every few years. The investigation of how Pakistan got new triggers was stopped for national security reasons. Why?
You can find the translation from Farsi easily enough. Testimony from an Fbi translator in the 9/11 hearings were about a Turkish translator who was mistranslating and not translating documents about the Pakistani nukes. I believe her name was Sibel Evans. You should find her on google easy enough.
What is exactly the difference between being state owned andbeing Corporate owned, andas far as you discomfort about the accurate portrtayal of who you are....You and Israelis like to kill non-cristian brown people and justify your attacks as killing terrosits becuase for you all colored non-cristian non jewish borne people are terrosits. What they report are fact, it your Corporate owned media outlets that vilify people, and sanitize you sick violent despicable nature.
Your assertion that i like to Kill non-christian brown people renforces my theory that most media is so dependent on it patrons continued financing that it brainwashes them into the ignorant view points they would like to believe. State run media does the same at the states request instead of on a financial basis.
I don't HAVE any media. I recognize that all media is biased and look at the news from all the angles to try and piece together a report that makes sense to me.
All mediaisnot Biased, your media is biasedbecuase it's corporate owned. The syrainmedia was showing facts, that US violated Syrain soveintyand killed ina buchery way, savgryway innocent, no-jewish nonchirsitan brown people, this is fact, now your media liek to sugar coat thisbucherybycalling allthose people terrosits or sayi this was a targetted killingandthat theinnocet were bystanders is redicoulus. Imagine if Iran or Syrian did suchan attack in the USA Dummmass! Youwoudl view it differently
This report just said Syrian media is state control and biased. Just because they showed what happened in this one case does not make there media unbiased.
No wonder you are so ignorant believing not all media is based. Feel sorry for you. Hope you like fascism.
No you are in love with Facism, you love you news the way that show you as the superior creature, and pathologies like this only show that peoplelike you are inferior. Not all news is baised. USnews outlets, LIE LIE LIE, and LIE more, demonize more whippingthe racism of idoits like you, Al-Jazeera is never baised. And Syria,they never LIE to thier audience, if they do IT'S THE LIE OF OMMESSION, but in this case they didn't Ommit anything, the US media did. US media isthe worst!
NO you are fucking stupid! I do know you, and know everything there is to knwo about you, in fat i know you so well that you feel you ahve to write a commentary like you did. It's just as hard for Syrian reporters to report from the US, I know who you are! US media is the mouthpiece ofthe US government, US Media tells LIES, while Syrian media accordingto thisstory and my own observatin of the syrian media is they OMMIT information, but they don't lie, or LIE of Omission, US medias LIES & LIES!
I agree with you, 90% of Americans don't even know that Syria was attacked by the USA. Al-Jazeera is a non-baised media group, not owned by Fox Networks(Republicians). You even have the official spokesperson for the White House giving an "no comment" speech, but they are NOT DENYING IT!
Land of the Free LMAO! If it were the land of the Free then why not show the American People the real news? Oh yeah that would drop morale for the future war on IRAN, because we know they are next 2B "liberated"
True, don't foget that a huge portion ofthe American public do not even care about the news at all! Willingly or conditionedto be that way, they just simply do not care, which is why the US media outlets feel they can get away with Lying and even reporting lies as fact, thier audience wants to see vicotry and they don't really care about the news. Underwear of Britney Spears is more imporant to them. And they voed for Obama because they liked his GQ looks. "Change" is just a fashion statement!
All edia has bias. The problem we face in the English-speaking world is that too much or our media share the SAME bias. This is why Al Jazeera is such a good thing. It does not share many of these biases and provides a different perspective - a valuable one. Often crticial and better for it.
the western media never shows footage of dead people on television--the nature of the tragedy is irrelevant. I know they're generally pro-military overall but that isn't why dead bodies weren't shown.
DatVillain83 1 year ago
Comment removed
datzfast 1 year ago
ok for starters helicopters are not used for airstrikes(fact1). if they were involved for support they would be attack helicopters such as the cobra or apache and not the blackhawk or pavehawks(fact2) . if a strike like this happened the first weapon of choice would be a drone/UAV and the second would be a fighter strike example f-16's launching from a base in iraq(fact3).And to add to the story, the U.N. sec. council ruled it is acceptable for the U.S to strike any target in any country anytime
novapj 2 years ago
The video depicts an American Black Hawk Helicopter. That helicopter is only capable as a troop carrier or medical evacuation.
ketchupman04 2 years ago
until the Arab world has freedom of the press. . . The press of the western world will always slow to respond.
enotstehw 2 years ago
nothing..to..do..with..the..american..people..but..the..american..policy
rammjalki 2 years ago
Syria is aiding insurgents in Iraq !!!!!! what American are doing in Iraq stiling oil for free and their smelly stupid ignorant soldier raping innocent iraqi girl you have to understand USA no more superpower
fardos333 3 years ago
this topical cowboy mentality,amarican are parasitic nation ,i hop you have a bad economy and china finish it jops ass hol mcdanifucker go and lick your mother pussy or smell your dog's assholl or eat at MCSHIT
fardos333 3 years ago
fuck American protestants religious terrorists cowboy
fardos333 3 years ago
I'm not Protestant. I'm not even religious. I can't wait to see Demascus turned to glass. Your words will get you killed some day, you hateful fuck. It's just like when your terrorists killed those people outside the US Embassy back in the 80's, then blamed it on us. Syria can lick my nutsack.
mcdanielcj 3 years ago
you're an idiot.
lordblazer 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what peace the peace american pigs gave to afganistan killing thousands of civilians or the peace american pigs gave to iraq killing thousands ?
what american define peace is killing muslims and if some one is resisting that is a big crime
FUCK YOU AMERICA and their allies
americasuck007 3 years ago
Syria is aiding insurgents in Iraq, as well as attempting to develop nuclear capabilities. Syria has been caught with it's pants down on several occasions. Now, as the US engages your terrorists, you say WE started it? Fuck you Syria.
mcdanielcj 3 years ago
why didn't u ask syria to kill these terrorists first and if they didn't respond u go and kill them. then till now there is no single tiny evidence that the people were killed were terrorists or syria owned or trying to own nuclear facilities or weapons. so shut up u american machine that obeys everything fox news tells u and go, and pay ur taxes to an army that invades countries like pigs.
tarek2000000 3 years ago
Bullshit
Assy84 2 years ago
You're all bullshitting the rest of the world with your crap. I hope your government kills the rest of you off. You fuck.
mcdanielcj 2 years ago
yea sure -_-
How you dare to speak about nuclear stuff. Instead of carrying the shame of hiroshima and nagasaki. You are just nuts.
Syria has been the most stable country in the area for many decades. now USA is looking for another cool excuse. What is it going to be now? Cause the Weapns of Mass Destruction is already taken.
Assy84 2 years ago
yeah, and you probably have them too! FUCKING PEICE OF SHIT. I'll find out where you live, and toss a grenade into your fucking house. GO FUCK YOURSELF!
mcdanielcj 2 years ago
Fucking bastards!
shockolanu 3 years ago
Fuck Obama
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Fuck McCain
mcdanielcj 3 years ago
The new bastion of truth in Media AlJazeera, haha. This story make me trust American media more than ever before.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Who cares what happened in Syria. What do you think Americans were doing in Iraq? Targeting innocent people just for the hell of it?
chris7777777777777 3 years ago
Sorry, we can't trust Muslims. That is their fault.
chris7777777777777 3 years ago 3
my goodness why would we even bother watching news from US like the CNN, CBS, FOX. These are propaganda agencies. They're not news agencies
homer30 3 years ago
electango
As George Carlin use to say "Bullshit! that's our fucking job!"
CivilRage 3 years ago
The response of US media reminds this viewer of communist
cogit8 3 years ago
Well obviously "Western" media are going to use 'allegation' qualifiers. It makes sense when you don't have reporters in the field and your sources are either in the US Government or the Syrian State TV.
psyops1618 3 years ago
" Please make sure I don't get sent to the camps".... LOL Hilarious!!!!
ballaamir 3 years ago
Get some, mother fuckers
namename654 3 years ago
Wow. From what I'd always been told, Al Jazeera was a radically biased network. This was quality, balanced reporting. This reminds me of what I used to see on American media when I was little. I might have to start tuning in. In the United States, our news is disgracefully biased. Thank you for honesty.
starclopsofish 3 years ago
Hi, welcome to aljazeera! I love aljazeera for the same reason. The way they report things is very balanced, and the Listening Post is one of my favourite programme
danthg 3 years ago
Thank you Al Jazeera for providing us in the US with an outlet for this reporting that is kept censored in this country. One day, hopefully sooner than later the real truth will replace the "no comments" that we are getting from the administration.
jjschultz101 3 years ago
Siryan have to do the same!!! And ssay we don't know and no comment. Al3yen bel3yen and so on.
cutegual 3 years ago
Syria got warning twice, if they continue to fool around, next time Damascus may be in ruins.
Is that what they want?
Jewishfan 3 years ago
kewishfan i wish you die by air accident. That is my wish to you in human person. Ppl like have to die may God destroy you.
cutegual 3 years ago
People don't forget the reasonthe US media is like this is becuase they are talking to thier demographic audience who just doesn'tare about the news at all! And it is a very illiterate stupid,mono-lingual mono-cultural audience! they can't even find Syria on the Map! And please don't giveme this they voted for Obama stuff, they voted for Obamabecause they lovd his GQ looks. Simple!
mrshutter77 3 years ago
noting will change from the west their lies will go on and rest of world will just follow becuase the white man is more truthful then the arab muslim or muslim as whole.thats why its easy for most ppl around world to leave their culter and faith because white man faith and culter is better then your own culter and faith.ppl of color are sheeps as always, histroy have show always.
ikran2007 3 years ago
Which government has killed more innocent civilians in Syria? Israel, the USA, or the Syrian regime itself? The Syrian regime itself, of course, by far. And did the Syrian news media cover any of the thousands and thousands of Syrian civilians killed by the Syrian regime? You know, when the good people of color of the Syrian regime killed the civilian people of color of Syria? I can't wait for your answer.
electango 3 years ago
yeah right, does that include USA civilian causalties? What about USA friendly fire on ally troops? The Americans are the true Terrorist!!
Its about time the big USA bully be seen for the Global Terrorist Regime that it truely is. Oh no, let's hope they don't come and "Liberate" us too. Know you facts before you open you trap you dumbass!
Wolfsbane909 3 years ago
Obviously you are completely ignorant of the history of the Syrian regime's wholesale slaughter of the Syrian people. Probably you also are totally ignorant of the Syrian regime's murderous activities in Lebanon. You see the world through the prism of irrational anti Americanism. Every evil in the world isn't the responsibility of America. Know you facts before you open you trap you dumbass!
electango 3 years ago
Hmm..let's look at it this way. How many military bases does Syria have over the world? zero. How many military bases does the Terrorist American troops have? Japan, Cuba, Guam, Korea just to name a few. Who feels that it's in their divine right to internationally police the world? Just because they have the most advanced military? Who invaded Iraq for oil? Who also violated the UN Charter & Geneva Convention ACT? America is the true rouge terrorist state with numerous violations globally.
Wolfsbane909 3 years ago
Syria, which is an impoverished country due to its government's dedication to militarism and fascism, is not a world power. America, a world power, saved Europe from self destruction in 1945 and saved China from Japanese militarism, as well. Some country is going to police the world. Leading candidates like China and Russia are much too genocidal. China's genocide in Cambodia and Russia's genocide in Chechnya prove that.
electango 3 years ago
may i ask what are you talking about when you say "syrian regime's genocide of its own people" .. if you mean the bombing of hama, then you are missing the fact that in it there was a terrorist group called the islamic brotherhood which has bombed and killed so many civilians in syria prior to the incident, so it was meerely and attempt to stop terrorism, was it tough yes was it necessary? absolutely.. if it wasn't for that syria would be in ruins
zayadnay 3 years ago
Did the Syrian regime have to destroy Hama to save Hama?
electango 3 years ago
well actually they didn't level down the whole city.. they told islamic brootherhood members to come out but they didn't then they told the people that live in hama to get out because they're going to bomb it.. so the people that stayed in harboring terrorists died unfortunately but the terrorists were ousted for good .. again was it a tough decision? yes but what's more important citizen's lives or terrorists'?
zayadnay 3 years ago
No, that will change soon with the downfall of the American Empire. China will rise and collect ALL that money that is owed to them by the USA. When will the Americans learn that violence & intimidation of lesser countries does not work. Look at China and how they prosper by establishing DIPLOMATIC relations with Africa, very different from American imperialism. Thats why they have propaganda news like FOX NEWS to dumb down the population of USA as if they weren't dumb enough already!
Wolfsbane909 3 years ago
Does China's support for the genocide of the Darfur Sudanese qualify in your mind as a good example of Chinese relations with Africa? Maybe in your mind selling advanced weaponry to a genocidal regime like Sudan's qualifies as a DIPLOMATIC move. It's obvious you yourself need less dumbing down before criticizing the population of the USA.
electango 3 years ago
FUck you.
mcdanielcj 3 years ago
blazing saddles all over again , until a zionest got the job as sectary of state (to be known as the "post for/and of israel rectum licking ),bow to your master israel the despot clinton , you think he give the job to some one who put the US first , , but i digress
yes corruption of the media is a huge problem , the truth will set you free :)
OrphanPaper 3 years ago
Fuck United States!!!
jasso65 3 years ago
The western media is part of the military amoury of attack on foriegn nations and the US military is so large, criminals can move within it with impunity.
The Syrian puppet government wanted to silence Islamic renegades in their own country but they did not think the Americans would be so indiscriminate in regards to the civilians involved in the attack.
qarnain06 3 years ago
Syria I'm going to give you the same message we gave Pakistan; We love your country but if you allow our enemies to hide there....there will be blood.
biggerflexible 3 years ago
What racism, what hypocracy that white reporters will not confirm anythign as fact unlessit comes froma white source, that is the definition of racism and bigotry.
mrshutter77 3 years ago
Middle-eastern individuals criticizing western media for spinning there report more in the favor of west is the definition of hypocrisy.
Many middle-eastern news outlets are state owned. Nearly every middle eastern news report goes to insane lengths to vilify the US and Israel and show victimization of Muslims.
Watch link TV here on You-tube if you don't believe me.
blackxavior 3 years ago
This particular outlet is not state owned and has fair enough coverage that they can criticize western media. What percentage of people in the west believe Russia attacked Georgia as opposed to people in the middle east?
Warnomore50 3 years ago 2
That's why i used the qualifiers MANY and NEARLY EVERY.
I don't really understand your second question and am not a public pollster so i can not answer it.
blackxavior 3 years ago
Probably 99% of Americans believe Russia attacked Georgia when the truth is Georgian troops and tanks crossed into South Ossetia at midnight local time August the 8th when russia only had peacekeeping troops in the country. Even with state controlled media the Middle East is probably more informed than the people who watch mainstream news in the US.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
Watch Link TV's report they are 30 min long free and right here on YouTube they cover a variety of Arab news channels. Watch link for a week and tell me if you still think your last statement is true.
The assertion that Russia was in the right and Georgia was in the wrong is false and you know it. The situation is very muddled with both sides having a great deal of fault.
blackxavior 3 years ago
I watch linktv and Mosaic all the time. Whether it was muddled or not and who is most at fault is not the issue. The issue is that main stream media reported this as a Russian attack on Georgia and did not give any facts about the muddled situations so they are misinformed. Just look at US coverage of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. Israel creates atrocities in an illegal occupation against international law and when retaliated against the US claims Israel is acting in self defense.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
I have never claimed western media is perfect. Only that it is nominally better than middle Eastern media. The fact that you know what is going on proves our system works. You are not restricted to any one source. Many middle easterners are.
blackxavior 3 years ago
People in the Middle East with only state run media at least know they are getting propaganda. In the US there is an illusion of freedom of the press that fools a lot of people into thinking they are watching news when they are only getting infotainment at the very least and usually heavily spun news that is worse than propaganda. The cable news networks produce propaganda geared towards their key demographics so you only get to choose your brand of propaganda.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
I have heard this argument before and i think it is totally ridiculas.
You want to tell me people that have grown up with one state controlled media outlet there whole life. People that live in poverty with a poor education are going to believe that the only news they know is propaganda?
The fact that Iran can still get hundreds of thousands of people to waist there weekend chanting Death to America 30 years after the revolution challenges your claim.
blackxavior 3 years ago
You assume it is state media that gets Iranians into the streets. Iran has access to western media. Could it be operation Ajax and the Ruthless puppet that we put in power because he was US and British corporate friendly and terrorized and tortured his people for decades?
Warnomore50 3 years ago
So you don't think 30 years is long enough to become the state promised by the revolution? I know Iran has limited access to outside media. Iran's state media has the same power as the corporate media in America to focus public opinion. A power used by the state to turn public opinion away from internal problems. Blaming America and Israel is Iran way of dealing with a system that has serious flaws.
blackxavior 3 years ago
All governments use scapegoats to distract the population. Do Iranians have a real reason to be angry at the US? The CIA along with the British bombed civilians in Iran and blamed it on the democratically elected president who was nationalizing the oil. Then they installed the Shah and trained his secret police in CIA torture techniques that were used very effectively against dissenters and Iranian oil once again benefited the corporations and not the people. Operation ajax has been declassified
Warnomore50 3 years ago
Why do you insist on telling me information i already know?
Why don't you just answer my questions?
Don't you think 30 years is long enough to become the state promised by the revolution? What is the benefit of living in the past? Did the US have anti british rallies 30 after the revolution? No we celebrated our revolution and our independence. Its obvious that there system is flawed and undemocratic hate mongering is there only was to secure there power base.
blackxavior 3 years ago
So you knew that but don't know that Iran has had other reasons since the revolution to be angry at America? If Iran seized US assets and put most of their navy and nuclear weapons off our coast because we wanted nuclear power and had signed the non proliferation treaty but Iran let Pakistan, India, Israel and other countries develop nuclear weapons without signing the treaty you would be OK with that I suppose?
Warnomore50 3 years ago
Wouldn't it be nice for you if the world was in black and with like that? The US has tried with very little success to stop all nuclear proliferation. When you insist on putting an idiot like Ahmajenidad as the mouthpiece of your country then don't be surprised when people start taking some of his crazy comment to heart. The US is far from being alone in wanting to sanction Iran. Many other middle eastern countries are talking about starting a nuclear program because they are afraid of Iran.
blackxavior 3 years ago
What crazy comments? 10 bucks says you don't have an accurate translation from Farsi of anything Ahmajenidad said. You did however correctly state him as a mouthpiece. He does not have the authority to toss a rock at another country. War is declared by the supreme leader with consent of the Guardian council. The same supreme leader that begged Bush to negotiate a peace deal with Israel and offered to put everything on the table in 2002. Cont.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
My factual assertion that many European country see Iran as a threat is totally relevant. Your portrayal of Iran as Tiny Tim is whats fucking lame. Your undermining your credibility as a rational person putting Iran on this moral pedestal when you know they support terrorist all over the world. Or how about the morals of there glorious leader in the Iran Iraq war sending brainwashed young boys with no training and hardly any weapons to be slaughtered overrunning Iraqi machine gun nests.
blackxavior 3 years ago
The leaders in Iran belong to a strict sect of Shia that believe they will go to hell if they kill innocent people. Zero tolerance for collateral damage. Why did they not use chemical weapons after Iraq used them against them even though they had them? Even if they want a bomb and any country that has oil and gas should get a bomb as a deterrent to having it taken by the US it would likely be used just for that. With one bomb they could take out one city and cont.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
That strict sect of Shia seems to have no problem with hanging people for apostasy.
What makes me think they are that Crazy? Have you heard the story of the 12th Imam?
blackxavior 3 years ago
They hang Islamic people who violate Islamic law. You can't in my opinion extrapolate that to mean they are crazy enough to ensure their complete annihilation to kill a few Jews.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
No they hang people that renounce Islam. Do you know the definition of apostasy?
The 12th Imam is a totally different argument. I guess you have never heard of it. Might do some research on what your glorious leaders really believes.
blackxavior 3 years ago
For awhile you seemed to at least be trying to make rational arguments. Now you are just trying to be as creative as possible at weaseling out of addressing anything I say. I don't play with my own children and am certainly not going to play with someone elses. If you are out of arguments please do me the courtesy of not wasting any more of my time.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
I don't believe they would do a preemptive nuclear strike on israel but i do believe they would use more bullying tactics to cohere there neighbors. You are one talk about weaseling out of answering questions. You have addressed less than half of my questions and none of the relevant ones.
blackxavior 3 years ago
You just wasted an enormous amount of my time with how dangerous Iran was. Now you say they could maybe get some neighbors to help bully them. Sunni Muslims don't have a habit of cooperating with Shia. You ignore my most relevant questions and statements and pick just one out each comment and answer or comment on it in a way usually designed to change the subject away from the most relevant part of my comment. I have been on yt for over two years and this is not my first rodeo with a pundit.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
I apologize for being rude. I get irritated when GMAIL notifier pops up so much that I can't get anything done but that is my problem and not yours. Bottom line is we are not getting anywhere and it does not look like that is going to change so it makes sense to me to call it quits.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
Okay, I enjoyed the discourse.
blackxavior 3 years ago
minutes later they would cease to exist. What makes you think they are that crazy? If they hate Jews so much why are so many Jews living in Iran unmolested and are even allowed to hold positions in government? You are parroting propaganda and trying to make a case that western media is better than other media at not presenting propaganda.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
25,000 Jews in the 70 million population of Iran. Wow there is a huge population of Jews in Iran. Iran has problems with Sunni terrorists in its own county and has been criticized for persecution of non Persians Zoroaster and every one else not within there narrowly defined fascist ideal.
blackxavior 3 years ago
You are suggesting they would launch a nuclear bomb and kill maybe a city of Jews knowing Israel would launch hundred against them. If they hated Jews enough to have their country wiped out to kill a few it seems like they would start at home.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
2. The US had no problem with Pakistan or Israel developing nuclear weapons and just signed a deal to give enriched uranium to India which has not signed a proliferation treaty. Your excuse for other people want to sanction them too is so fucking lame and you are absolutely undermining your argument that people in the west are more informed that people with only state media.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
100 buck says i have seen Arab translations on Arab news channels with Ahmajenidad saying some one needs to wipe Israel off the map. I have seen Link broadcasts with him say crazy shit like he was engulfed in holy light at the UN while speaking and that the Holocaust never happened. I remember every one in the Gov. freakin out then Pakistan got the nuke so that is wrong. India and Israel are stable Allies we had more to lose than gain by confronting them.
blackxavior 3 years ago
The translation from Farsi is "The zionist regime should disappear from the pages of time". Zionism is a secular movement (religious Jews are forbidden from going to Israel by the Torah) that has a history of killing Arabs and stealing their land. Not surprised myself they are not loved in the middle east. Nuclear triggers of plutonium have to be replaced every few years. The investigation of how Pakistan got new triggers was stopped for national security reasons. Why?
Warnomore50 3 years ago
Where can i check these "facts"?
blackxavior 3 years ago
You can find the translation from Farsi easily enough. Testimony from an Fbi translator in the 9/11 hearings were about a Turkish translator who was mistranslating and not translating documents about the Pakistani nukes. I believe her name was Sibel Evans. You should find her on google easy enough.
Warnomore50 3 years ago
Well he has made hundreds of ridicules statements and Iran's state run media has made it clear the country's position toward Israel.
blackxavior 3 years ago
What is exactly the difference between being state owned andbeing Corporate owned, andas far as you discomfort about the accurate portrtayal of who you are....You and Israelis like to kill non-cristian brown people and justify your attacks as killing terrosits becuase for you all colored non-cristian non jewish borne people are terrosits. What they report are fact, it your Corporate owned media outlets that vilify people, and sanitize you sick violent despicable nature.
mrshutter77 3 years ago
Your assertion that i like to Kill non-christian brown people renforces my theory that most media is so dependent on it patrons continued financing that it brainwashes them into the ignorant view points they would like to believe. State run media does the same at the states request instead of on a financial basis.
I don't HAVE any media. I recognize that all media is biased and look at the news from all the angles to try and piece together a report that makes sense to me.
blackxavior 3 years ago
All mediaisnot Biased, your media is biasedbecuase it's corporate owned. The syrainmedia was showing facts, that US violated Syrain soveintyand killed ina buchery way, savgryway innocent, no-jewish nonchirsitan brown people, this is fact, now your media liek to sugar coat thisbucherybycalling allthose people terrosits or sayi this was a targetted killingandthat theinnocet were bystanders is redicoulus. Imagine if Iran or Syrian did suchan attack in the USA Dummmass! Youwoudl view it differently
mrshutter77 3 years ago
This report just said Syrian media is state control and biased. Just because they showed what happened in this one case does not make there media unbiased.
No wonder you are so ignorant believing not all media is based. Feel sorry for you. Hope you like fascism.
blackxavior 3 years ago
No you are in love with Facism, you love you news the way that show you as the superior creature, and pathologies like this only show that peoplelike you are inferior. Not all news is baised. USnews outlets, LIE LIE LIE, and LIE more, demonize more whippingthe racism of idoits like you, Al-Jazeera is never baised. And Syria,they never LIE to thier audience, if they do IT'S THE LIE OF OMMESSION, but in this case they didn't Ommit anything, the US media did. US media isthe worst!
mrshutter77 3 years ago
I have one truth for you guy. You don't now me your don't now anything about me and you are totally ignorant in all you assumptions about me.
You are so F**King Stupid? This report watch it again just said that the Syrian news is biased and that it is hard to report from the country.
blackxavior 3 years ago
NO you are fucking stupid! I do know you, and know everything there is to knwo about you, in fat i know you so well that you feel you ahve to write a commentary like you did. It's just as hard for Syrian reporters to report from the US, I know who you are! US media is the mouthpiece ofthe US government, US Media tells LIES, while Syrian media accordingto thisstory and my own observatin of the syrian media is they OMMIT information, but they don't lie, or LIE of Omission, US medias LIES & LIES!
mrshutter77 3 years ago
I agree with you, 90% of Americans don't even know that Syria was attacked by the USA. Al-Jazeera is a non-baised media group, not owned by Fox Networks(Republicians). You even have the official spokesperson for the White House giving an "no comment" speech, but they are NOT DENYING IT!
Land of the Free LMAO! If it were the land of the Free then why not show the American People the real news? Oh yeah that would drop morale for the future war on IRAN, because we know they are next 2B "liberated"
Wolfsbane909 3 years ago
True, don't foget that a huge portion ofthe American public do not even care about the news at all! Willingly or conditionedto be that way, they just simply do not care, which is why the US media outlets feel they can get away with Lying and even reporting lies as fact, thier audience wants to see vicotry and they don't really care about the news. Underwear of Britney Spears is more imporant to them. And they voed for Obama because they liked his GQ looks. "Change" is just a fashion statement!
mrshutter77 3 years ago
All edia has bias. The problem we face in the English-speaking world is that too much or our media share the SAME bias. This is why Al Jazeera is such a good thing. It does not share many of these biases and provides a different perspective - a valuable one. Often crticial and better for it.
linuxluver 3 years ago
The problem with that is all media is biased and you can look at all sides of biased media and still not have the truth.
Warnomore50 3 years ago