Reduce CO2 Emissions - Conservation International (CI)

[CameronsContrick]

Cut CO2?

Either stop politicians talking so much or just kill a few billion people, which I know is part of the green agenda.

[melisantika]

I am very happy to see the vidoe The United States and China are the top 2 emitters of greenhouse gas emissions due to industry, from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You

[Ondelendo]

Steady I Really Like This Video The United States and China are the top 2 emitters of greenhouse gas emissions due to industry

[bebeheuy]

Good, I like that you share this video The United States and China are the top 2 emitters of greenhouse gas emissions due to industry, but Indonesia and Brazil, I wish success always

[AntoMelta]

Nice Video The United States and China are the top 2 emitters of greenhouse gas emissions due to industry, but Indonesia and Brazil That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You

[willamricard]

I Really Like The Video From Your The United States and China are the top 2 emitters of greenhouse gas emissions due to industry, but Indonesia and Brazil

[imegatrone]

Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing The United States and China are the top 2 emitters of greenhouse gas emissions due to industry, but Indonesia and Brazil

[ukpropaganda]

Politically, the Greens are the new Reds.

[ukpropaganda]

Whilst I disagree with mass deforestation, greenies like these have been claiming an area the size of Wales disappears every year for 30+ years.

At that rate it should have all gone!

Go download 'The Great Global Warming Swindle' from the archive dot com website.

The Greenland ice sheet also loses 30% of its area every year ; even MORE propaganda.

[adamkow3166]

Just bought a new TV, the batteries come in a plastic bag, the remote in a plastic bag, the screws in a plastic bag, the manual in a plastic bag, the AV cable in a plastic bag, the power cord in a plastic bag. Governments of the world are you starting to get the picture ? You're not about saving the environment, it's all about how to screw more money out of ordinary citizens through carbon taxes.

[lillen300]

I found a great way to reduce electricity use on tv and pc, less commercials that we have to sit through and watch!

[eduardosfreitas]

You are hipocrite. When the forest falls, in an ordinary way, is to supply the industries of US and China with soja, and other stuffs that will become industrialized. We dont need of CI, here! We need of another way of consumption!

[SmartIntelligentNerd]

i have a question: several people state that humans cause 2% of total CO2 emmisions. yet scientinsts say human activites are causing global warming. so how can we cuse global warming if humans only cause 2% of the co2

[FluorescentColours]

Wooooo! save the world :P x

[HonestBollocks]

you what would be the solution abolishing technology, then everything would be fine but since humanity is too selfish to do that, and since you're soooooooooo worried about the CO2 emissions here's an idea shut your mouth and stop fucking breathing, also if CO2 is such a big factor in global warming don't you think the world would have melted by now with ppl yacking on nonstop, also CO2 is natural and i think nuclear energy is affecting the climate a lot more than CO2

[ort777]

A quick question: what is your stance on nuclear power?

[laurens890]

uranium is also limited, just as fossil fuels. Also, to enrich uranium costs a lot of fossil fuels, so I think it isn't the good solution.

[ort777]

No reasonable alternative source of energy is inexpensive. Wind is unreasonable and untested completely. People living near turbines are complaining of various illnesses - here we go again! Even if water was determined to be a source of energy, I'd probably hear that water is limited, am I correct?

[mrspittmon]

I think more people believe Al gore than you. You sound stupid just by saying that CO2 isnt a pollutant. Looks like you have to go back to high school and retake your science courses!

[oort777]

Nature contributes 97% of C02, man 3% to our atmosphere. You can call it whatever you want but you sound rather foolish calling a natural phenomena "a pollutant". The IPCC can define anything it wants as a pollutant but it doesn't make it so. 31,000 scientist disagree with Al - I don't really care if a lot of kids & naive teachers agree with him. Some day you'll come around.

[Bradford1966]

CO2 is not a Pollutant.

[ort777]

Dittos. Braindead enviros don't get it. Global warming is over - check the data.

[SteveNordqu]

You know, if you cited a study people could choose to agree with you or not; 18M scientists who agree with Gore v. 13K who do not is a bit of a shrugoff. Do you think biodiversity just fixed itself, too; perhaps you helped raise 100,000 large novel (non-virtual) predators this year?

[oort777]

Okay, Steve, the number is 31,000, not 13,000 and I believe Al is a liar and cares more about power than anything. I'll give you proof that nature is better than man at fixing itself. After Valdez spilled, man went up and tried to clean up - to this day if you look up there you can see the bleached stones where man tried to "fix" nature. Where man stopped and nature took over is perfect. How do you explain that?

[oort777]

And another perfect example. After Saint Helens, there was an acre of land that "man" put a million or so into "bringing back" - well you can only guess the result. Nature healed itself. This whole co2/pollution is a load of turd. We've had more in the past and been just fine. All I can say is just stay out of the way because conservatives know how to take care of the world. You libs know how to screw things up.

[SteveNordqu]

Al strikes me as a legislator, directly the opposite of pretending to Promethean God of Nature (though he accepts some laurels if you really wanted to...). If you're going to address this as man Doctoring nature, rather than man not campaigning harm on nature, your position is better but your argument worse. Vignettes where we chose to do X to reforest (surely the published a plan and method? ... Which we would then NOT try again?) are just that. Your close is reprehensible.

[oort777]

My close is truthful, although painful, I know. Your flowery language is pure poetry but does little to convince anyone your grasp of the material. Nature is far powerful than man and man is a gnat compared to it. Might I point you to the Bikini Atoll/nuclear testing and the recovery of the area since? There are a few in your camp that have good intentions but their so called solutions would kill economies & people - something your side seems to care so little about. Shocking but true.

[SteveNordqu]

Sometimes I read or make more firsthand reports and evidence lines up much better than it would from conflicting Newsweek abstracts. Your close back there was partisan and declarative with no merit or aim, so your statements about Gore, who -is- an ad hoc legislator, sort of blow back on you.  Keep an eye on the roll of temperatures and fauna, and read actual working documents so lousy fixups do not land near you. A useful thing by you? Occasionally a common cause?

[ort777]

Firsthand reports? Newsweek abstracts? Are we delving into deep science here? My partisan statements are done for a reason - this is a political issue. GW is also a religion. I've read up on this well enough to know that the pundits have changed from GW to climate change because the evidence isn't on their side. Playing with the timelines to their advantage is just plain manipulative but honest scientists have shot this to pieces. I'll back it up but you're not interested, I know.

[SteveNordqu]

Well, back it up counter to my interests then. Quick, before refineries all go to weeds and the Hillary Rock-Bleaching Council is on the march....

[ort777]

Since links are spammed, I would suggest you go to the most popular search engine out there and type in climate audit as one word. This is one of the many sites I visit and they've done a great job of picking this theory to pieces. For instance, the hockey graph - wrong. The nice placement of thermometers on parking lots or at or near exhaust vents to inflate temps - pics included! I have more sites and countless articles so I'm quite confident you'll learn a few things.

[oort777]

Al as legislator? Try Svengali. His sole purpose would be power & money since losing the election. His gross failure with the ethanol vote and its worldwide impact are devastating. Surely you aren't so naive to believe this hoax, rather you sound like someone who just adores nature - I for one am a nature lover. Maybe I'm wrong, I just find it hard to believe so many people can believe something that has nothing to back it up, especially temps. - the basis for which the theory is built.

[AngrySmileDonkey]

either is water to the human body- but if you get enough of it you'll die.

[ort777]

What? Are you trying to compare the human body to the earth? Are you serious? This is the problem with you enviro's. You are too simple and don't see how awesome the creation is. All you can do is trust idiot brainwashed Al Gore pukes and their "trustworthy" (cough, cough) models. Give me a break.

[AngrySmileDonkey]

..no. i was comparing the idea that too much of something is bad. freak out much?

[AngrySmileDonkey]

and to top it off i'm not even an "enviro", i drive a car around and spend hours on the internet. i also use styrofoam. so you can pretty much just take all your angry words and put them right back in your ass.

[oort777]

Uh, who's the "angry" one here. Al Gore and most Hollywood people use their cars and the internet a lot, too but they're enviro's. I hope you're not. Anyone that implies we're overdosing on co2 sounds & smells like and enviro to me. My words weren't at all angry, just having a little debate here.

[mrspittmon]

Where did u hear that? The increase in CO2 has cause all these recent natural disaters like the cyclone in China and forest fire in Malibu. CO2 is also depleating the ozone layer. Its true that its good for humans, plants and animals but its still a pollutant.

[oort777]

You've obviously been mislead by Al Gore. Do you even know what creates ozone? The sun is fully responsible for that and we used to think we could harm it with aerosols & freon. Forest fires were caused by people and because the underbrush has been mismanaged - enviro policy - it spread. Cyclones & hurricanes are driven by El Nino and La Nina. Read before you post. Don't be lead by the nose (Al). You will sound very stupid.

[shkodrani16]

they are the lung of earth and if they are reduced than a lot of people and other animal are going to feel the effects especialy people living at high altitude