LOL Don't you see that Kent is simply trying to show that Evolution is a religion? It is a religion you fools! You think we came from a rock and you call this science! ''It can be tested'' lollll You really really are all deluded.
Wait, hovind was complaining earlier that we always classify decendents of palatypus as palatypus....but then claims that palatypus always give birth to other palatypus.
Does that seem like a great argument against his own position to anyone else?
You can't argue with stupidity. Well, you can, but the only results are hilarity. Hovind reminds me of a guy I used to work with. He presumes to be brilliant, but he's actually an ignorant idiot, and that unique character set of ignorance and idiocy can be classified, within the nested hierarchy, as "Creationists".
LOL Don't you see that Kent is simply trying to show that Evolution is a religion? It is a religion you fools! You think we came from a rock and you call this science! ''It can be tested'' lollll You really really are all deluded.
axe414 1 year ago
Wait, hovind was complaining earlier that we always classify decendents of palatypus as palatypus....but then claims that palatypus always give birth to other palatypus.
Does that seem like a great argument against his own position to anyone else?
AlexKincaid 3 years ago
You can't argue with stupidity. Well, you can, but the only results are hilarity. Hovind reminds me of a guy I used to work with. He presumes to be brilliant, but he's actually an ignorant idiot, and that unique character set of ignorance and idiocy can be classified, within the nested hierarchy, as "Creationists".
dLimboStick 3 years ago 2