How do you do this?! I have the new MacBook Pro i7 2.66 and the 330m and Windows 7 in Bootcamp with things turned to around medium, and get worse framerates than the older less powerful MacBook Pro with better settings in this video.. I'm obviously doing something very wrong, could someone help.
wow, turning the dhaders to low and shadows off really makes the lighting look like crap. the detail still looks good, but it didn't look like sunset at all, which is the time of dy that encounter is set in. But it still col you got solid frame rates just to experience Crysis. It's not just eye candy. The gameplay is solid. great shooter.
You're the one who's retarded. Both shadow and shader settings are on low so the average settings would be something like medium. Also, why do you even think that MacBook Pro would run Crysis on high settings that well?? This guy doesn't even mention his sucky graphics card in the video description (which is 9600M btw).
wish the 13 inch had a better graphics chip I don't want a big laptop (15 and 17 inch is too big for me not heavy just big and annoying to carry around) !
People don't really get the argument about Macs and games. They aren't saying it's impossible to play games, but developers find it pointless to make games for Macs because they wouldn't get enough profit to make it worthwhile since you can't customize a Mac.
42-57 fps that is crazy for a laptop now i want to see a laptop pc with the same specs do that macbook pros own im going to buy one soon nice video 5 stars
He is cheating, low shadows and shaders. I payed 1400 bucks for a 17" Gateway laptop with a 2.26ghz core 2 duo, 4gb DDR3 ram, 1gb 9800m GTS that card rocks for mobile gaming. And no the gateway is not that thick its about 1.2inches tall (closed). I just dont understand why you buy a mac to do pc gaming on :/ seems rather dumb to me. lol but do what yall like. haha. besides i heard macs heat up like a bitch during gaming. Coming from a friend that owns one.
@QSideProductions He's hardly cheating. Sure shaders on low, but it's running fucking Crysis. Besides, I think this is the pro without the video card. Yes they do get really hot. That is true.
@QSideProductions Here is an example. I have a MacBook Pro that was $2,000. Not only can I game on it with my windows partition, I use the OS X (Depending on your preference, OS X can be a lot better than Windows for utility) side to do whatever else I want. Also, the MacBook Pro is hands down the most sturdy and reliable laptop for the price. The battery life cannot be beat either. It's really the best 2grand I've ever spent on anything. FYI I have a gaming PC I built myself too.
too bad yours is going to be clunky. ill let you touch my sleek one inch thick unibody alluminum macbook pro's glass screen if you ask real nicely :P jk jk
i want to say... very true. Macs are good for things like file converting, editing, and basic web design. but the thing is, they are not "meant" for gaming,and you have to go and download a torrent, or go buy a new OS just play fucking game! Although to the one who posted this vid, props, i have never been able to play Crysis, and i would play it on a Mac (that has been bootcamped) any day.
I don't think that's right... My brand new 15" 2.66GHz with the 256MB 9600M GT running Windows 7 x64 gets maybe 40FPS at 1440x900 with everything on low. At medium, I get less than 10FPS.
What resolution are you at? Can I see a screenshot of your graphics settings?
tried to turn on the 2nd video card? my macbook pro has 2.66 ghz dual, 4gb ddr3, and 9400gt+9600gt in sli....it does about 30 fps on medium-high with shafdows low
all i tried was to help you with our problem. but i see my helps not appreciated.
EDIT:
they work together....such as in cod4...when you turn the "dual video cards" option off, the performance is weak. but when you switch it to "on", it has about 40 fps more at my macbokpro.
POSSIBLE for the two to work together. It just won't work. A quick Google search would explain why. For two video cards to work together, they have to be EXACTLY the same. It doesn't work. You're just seeing things.
Yeah, they'll work, but the 3870 will decrease its power to that of the 3850.
I'm sorry, but you're a fucking idiot. It's IMPOSSIBLE. Why? One reason is that the 9400M is completely shared and the 9600M GT is dedicated. In Windows or Linux only the 9600M GT will be active. This isn't hard to figure out. SLI is NOT possible on a MacBook Pro and will never be supported (on the current models).
im sorry but your wrong buddy, do soem homework the mac website even states this, both the graphic cards arnt in sli, 9400m is in power save mode, 9600m is for high en tasks and they both run on the same memory 256mb , an sli card is 1 inch thichk not including casing around it im sorry but the mac pro will never fit sli untill they invest in thickness
Fact is, people are gonna talk shit on apple forever. They are just jealous or stupid idiots that can't afford one or just play pc games all day long.
Or we shit talk apple because we can find products better then it that have better hardware and the software is easy to toggle into OSX. Mac is just overpriced, and there are so many articles on Apple asking Microsoft to stop there commercials because its greatly impacting there market.
You know what? Honest to god, i'm done making comments on any of this shit. You're not gonna convince me that apple sucks and i'm not gonna convince you that microsoft sucks. I absolutely love my macbook and will continue to support apple because they make quality products and give great customer support. If they didn't, they wouldn't be around because they DO cost more, but they are EXCELLENT machines. I don't give a fuck what you microsoft fanboys believe.
Im not a microsoft fanboy. I have the new macbook pro, and i was dissappointed with it because everything i was able to do with it i could easy do 3 times better in Windows. Plus , an alienware machine with unibody and all around metal costs half the price of a macbook and tears it apart. And FFS why dont they have the removable battery.
lol... so you agree they're not gamers machines and that doing your "stuff 3 times better" makes no sense given they run Windows as well. If your "stuff" is games, why didn't u get an Alienware for half price?
erm, did I miss something or shall I retype in Chinese?
Or did you not check the specs before you bought it? I doubt being of unibody construction makes a difference to drivers, graphicscards and operating systems. I'm guessing though.
Sorry , if i meant to say that i was able to game better i would have said gaming, not stuff. Durrrrr. The "stuff" i was referring to was audio recording and editing , video recording and editting , along with being able to easily compose DVDs and so on. And an Alienware is half the price of a macbook and out does it.
those frames are nice, but if i were you i would drop the textures to medium, and put the shaders on medium as well, because Crysis looks like shit with shaders on low.
this laptop might not be pretty like a mac but it has a spectacular GPU. and read reviews from newegg. People play games with max quality at 1920x1080 resolution.
Anandtech shows that ATI 4870 x2 gets 35fps at 1920x1080 on VERY HIGH.
Great, so you're going to lug the 18" laptop around? For the price, the MacBook Pro may not be the best, but Apple's build quality is just outstanding. I guarantee you will not find anything that's better quality than an Apple computer. Look at how much they fit into the laptop and how thin it is.
THis Laptop Sucks for the price, no offence but you can get an P-6860 for 630 to 1k dollars and it gives you from 17 to 25 Fps with all In Very high Dx10 using Vista, i Have dual boot and i tried ur Configuration and it gives me around 60 Fps Vsync on , exept on some parts that it lowers to 49- 45
it may not be a fantastic value for the price from a gamer's perspective, however, it is for many others. I think it's cool that the new macbooks game playing capability was greatly increased compared to the last generation so that consumers have the option to still decently play games while having a macbook and all the applications and practicability that makes a mac a mac.
in this game shadows and shaders are the hardest things for computers to render. on a low end iMac (3GB ram, hd 2400xt 128MB, C2D 2GHz Windows Vista) This game runs fine maxed out (very high) , except shadows and shaders low. the moment I bring those up, 10fps! and DX 10 just about halves the frame rate of DX9. This game only starts to get pretty with shaders and shadows on high. medium and low are UGLY!.
thats pretty cool a friend of mine tried to play crisis on a samsung r590 with a 2.4 intel centrino 2. 2gb of DDR3 1066 and the same 9x graphics card and it bogged his down at this setting a bit. there was some lag. io want to try this on my intel 2.6 MBP on 4 gb of ram to see how it fairs. it has an 8600m GPU which is essentailly the same chip as the 9600m. (G92 chip is really a renamed G80)
thats cool and all. I mean I can only run on my laptop with 13 fps all low on 1024 x 768 but....
shaders are what make crysis (and most games) look good. When you drop that you lose most of your graphical bang. If I were you I would get shaders on medium and put some other things down a bit. I think overall it would end up looking better.
Hey guys - I'll test with shaders to high and shadows to low, see how that holds. I know the game doesn't look as nice with shaders down, but it's a beautiful game either way. I'd rather play with a steady freamerate than with better settings. Obviously MBPs aren't designed to replace your gaming rig, so there will have to be some compromise.
I'm a mac owner and I have vids on here. I was impressed until you said you have the shadows and shaders on low. That defeats the purpose of this game. Have you tried updating your graphic card's drivers in XP? I really wanna get this laptop within the next couple of weeks... but now I'm debating. Also... what's the resolution you have it set at and is XP professional the only copy of XP that will default to the 9600 card or are their ways around that, or does XP Home support that too?
the macbook pro can handle crysis pretty good, the fraps just slows it down, so don't use fraps. I can run crysis warhead maxed out in 1200/800 resolution and shadow and shaders set in medium with vsync. it runs pretty well
I recently chose the new MBP over a PC...but for the same $ as a MBP you could get a tricked out PC w/ Blu Ray player, HD resolution / HD Screen...really sick shit...but I realized I don't really need that stuff...only use computer for basic stuff and a little gaming...so I went with the MBP
Not a stupid question at all, since it's a lot of money.
To me macs offer everything in what I'm looking for in a computer. It really depends on what you want to do. Any video/photo work, macs are great. Gaming? Not so much, but that's changing. The new Macbook Pros are starting to hold their own, and it will only get better.
PCs have better third party support and allow you to really build your system the way you want it.
CLB: 1024x768 is what it defaulted to. Native Res I guess?
Mark: I would say the bump to 2.8 isn't worth the extra cash if you're just thinking of gaming. As for Vista and DX10, it'll probably vary by game, but if you do go with Vista I would make sure you go with 4GB of memory.
Thanks Jimmy. Well I already have XP so may just stick with it for the moment. The 2.53 will be fine for all I do, I do a bit of video encoding but only films, I don't use Final Cut or anything. I do like less heat and better battery life which from the reviews I've read the 2.8 uses slightly more power. I will be playing lots of games though :) You're Crysis vid has seriously impressed me, the 2.53 can certainly handle it.
Thanks for doing this. I will be getting the new Mac Book pro very soon also. Can you tell me though, is the 2.8ghz CPU worth it and also is it better to use Vista for DX10 graphics or should I stick with XP? Money is fine but if there's no difference then I would like to know. Thanks
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What THINKs mac users obout PC users that try to run MAC OS X on there PCs? - Thay say - PC users are crazy.
So we say obout you the same too. CRYSIS - desinged with so perfect and SOOO beautiful graphics running on Vista, DX10.. its fully computer revolution in game industry. Its MUST BE seeing on PC with the best quality settings. So what YOU jimmypopjr demonstration here to us??? BUL SHET.
Your graphics settings are disgusting. Be not ashamed and be not praised by it. A shame mac users!
macbook have no power
halacha666 8 months ago
Vaio f series are better then macbook pro
can get better specs for 2grand cheaper
aznboi1398 1 year ago
How do you do this?! I have the new MacBook Pro i7 2.66 and the 330m and Windows 7 in Bootcamp with things turned to around medium, and get worse framerates than the older less powerful MacBook Pro with better settings in this video.. I'm obviously doing something very wrong, could someone help.
VoLcOmDuDe27RWTF 1 year ago
wow, turning the dhaders to low and shadows off really makes the lighting look like crap. the detail still looks good, but it didn't look like sunset at all, which is the time of dy that encounter is set in. But it still col you got solid frame rates just to experience Crysis. It's not just eye candy. The gameplay is solid. great shooter.
TargetRender 1 year ago
if you put linux on it and run crysis you get around 32 fps maxed in the most intence battles
AwwC00L 1 year ago
this is not high settings. this is somewhere between low and medium...
TheFlameFox 1 year ago
your retarded have you even played this game before?
Obamagavemychildaids 1 year ago
@Obamagavemychildaids
You're the one who's retarded. Both shadow and shader settings are on low so the average settings would be something like medium. Also, why do you even think that MacBook Pro would run Crysis on high settings that well?? This guy doesn't even mention his sucky graphics card in the video description (which is 9600M btw).
TheFlameFox 1 year ago
wish the 13 inch had a better graphics chip I don't want a big laptop (15 and 17 inch is too big for me not heavy just big and annoying to carry around) !
gsharpshooter80 1 year ago
People don't really get the argument about Macs and games. They aren't saying it's impossible to play games, but developers find it pointless to make games for Macs because they wouldn't get enough profit to make it worthwhile since you can't customize a Mac.
BlueFlashProductions 1 year ago
i got 90-100 fps on cs 1.6 on my laptop is that good?
jo3y227 1 year ago
42-57 fps that is crazy for a laptop now i want to see a laptop pc with the same specs do that macbook pros own im going to buy one soon nice video 5 stars
POSHLOVER12 2 years ago
He is cheating, low shadows and shaders. I payed 1400 bucks for a 17" Gateway laptop with a 2.26ghz core 2 duo, 4gb DDR3 ram, 1gb 9800m GTS that card rocks for mobile gaming. And no the gateway is not that thick its about 1.2inches tall (closed). I just dont understand why you buy a mac to do pc gaming on :/ seems rather dumb to me. lol but do what yall like. haha. besides i heard macs heat up like a bitch during gaming. Coming from a friend that owns one.
QSideProductions 1 year ago
the heating was a problem with the previous macbooks and pros qside and i havent bought one yet im waiting till they get an i7 chip
POSHLOVER12 1 year ago
@QSideProductions He's hardly cheating. Sure shaders on low, but it's running fucking Crysis. Besides, I think this is the pro without the video card. Yes they do get really hot. That is true.
Naoki09 1 year ago
@Naoki09
Dude, what is the point of buying a mac if you just boot xp through bootcamp? You can get a lot more muscle with a pc. (Cash:product) ratio
QSideProductions 1 year ago
@QSideProductions Here is an example. I have a MacBook Pro that was $2,000. Not only can I game on it with my windows partition, I use the OS X (Depending on your preference, OS X can be a lot better than Windows for utility) side to do whatever else I want. Also, the MacBook Pro is hands down the most sturdy and reliable laptop for the price. The battery life cannot be beat either. It's really the best 2grand I've ever spent on anything. FYI I have a gaming PC I built myself too.
Naoki09 1 year ago
Comment removed
Betard77 1 year ago
Why does everyone try to play games on laptops? Buy a Mac for non gaming related stuff, then get a Windows Desktop for gaming and such.
98mongos 2 years ago
ur mom
Davidlovesmac 2 years ago
im so glad i saved up for an alienware for the same price xD
nzcookiemonster 2 years ago
uhh huh good luck with that
Davidlovesmac 2 years ago
@nzcookiemonster
too bad yours is going to be clunky. ill let you touch my sleek one inch thick unibody alluminum macbook pro's glass screen if you ask real nicely :P jk jk
matticustrixie 2 years ago 7
haha you noobs think macs are for gaming, when you are using a microsoft os to play games... FAIL
QSideProductions 1 year ago
Fine give my comment a thumbs down but you guys are still retarded. :D
QSideProductions 1 year ago 9
@QSideProductions
i want to say... very true. Macs are good for things like file converting, editing, and basic web design. but the thing is, they are not "meant" for gaming,and you have to go and download a torrent, or go buy a new OS just play fucking game! Although to the one who posted this vid, props, i have never been able to play Crysis, and i would play it on a Mac (that has been bootcamped) any day.
Jdrew89 1 year ago
@Jdrew89 Thats retarded, you could've boughten a pc with better hardware for the same price and partitioned mac.
Better machine, same price, and you still get your shit OS
Betard77 1 year ago
dude get a pc! with 2 way sli or 3 way sli graphics card setup!
xtreme404 2 years ago
Nice video dude. Do you have the 256mb or 512mb card?
willplez 2 years ago
u guys don't fuckin get it don't you ?
i have the older macbook pro with these spec :
Core2Duo 2.5Ghz
6Gb DDR2 Ram
6Mb L2 Cache
500Gb Caviar 7200
Geforce 8600m GT 512MB GDDR3
And guess what? i can run any games on Windows Vista 32Bits At Very High Settings (but i have to turn VSync Off)
ALSO whatever Nvidia graphic card you have, fuckin update ur fuckin drivers right?
I Got 186.91 ForceWare Driver, and everything is perfect ! check laptopvideo2go
Zangetzu33 2 years ago
I don't think that's right... My brand new 15" 2.66GHz with the 256MB 9600M GT running Windows 7 x64 gets maybe 40FPS at 1440x900 with everything on low. At medium, I get less than 10FPS.
What resolution are you at? Can I see a screenshot of your graphics settings?
BeSweeeet 2 years ago
Are you running in DX10?
Ace33blue 2 years ago
Yeah, that's probably why I'm getting a low frame rate.
BeSweeeet 2 years ago
tried to turn on the 2nd video card? my macbook pro has 2.66 ghz dual, 4gb ddr3, and 9400gt+9600gt in sli....it does about 30 fps on medium-high with shafdows low
PeterGriffinSkate 2 years ago
Sorry, but it's impossible to turn on the 9400M and the 9600M GT at the same time. It just doesn't work that way. Your comment doesn't work.
BeSweeeet 2 years ago
all i tried was to help you with our problem. but i see my helps not appreciated.
EDIT:
they work together....such as in cod4...when you turn the "dual video cards" option off, the performance is weak. but when you switch it to "on", it has about 40 fps more at my macbokpro.
PeterGriffinSkate 2 years ago
No, it's IMPOSSIBLE, as in NOT
POSSIBLE for the two to work together. It just won't work. A quick Google search would explain why. For two video cards to work together, they have to be EXACTLY the same. It doesn't work. You're just seeing things.
BeSweeeet 2 years ago
WTF Dude!?
NOOOO!!!
you can put a 3850 and a 3870 in crossfire and they will perform great! why should they put to video cards in it, when only one will do the deal?
PeterGriffinSkate 2 years ago
Yeah, they'll work, but the 3870 will decrease its power to that of the 3850.
I'm sorry, but you're a fucking idiot. It's IMPOSSIBLE. Why? One reason is that the 9400M is completely shared and the 9600M GT is dedicated. In Windows or Linux only the 9600M GT will be active. This isn't hard to figure out. SLI is NOT possible on a MacBook Pro and will never be supported (on the current models).
BeSweeeet 2 years ago 3
yes it it, check the apple website
electricity95 2 years ago
Who and what is this in reply to?
BeSweeeet 2 years ago
yes, you can run 9600gt and 9400m at the same time. this is a reply to you.
electricity95 2 years ago
NO YOU CAN'T! It's impossible. You can't use both of them at the same time. It's either or. Go do your homework.
BeSweeeet 2 years ago
im sorry but your wrong buddy, do soem homework the mac website even states this, both the graphic cards arnt in sli, 9400m is in power save mode, 9600m is for high en tasks and they both run on the same memory 256mb , an sli card is 1 inch thichk not including casing around it im sorry but the mac pro will never fit sli untill they invest in thickness
nzcookiemonster 2 years ago
You use to many shots put the gun on single shot. But over all nice vid
4801524445 2 years ago
where can I buy games for my mac? The mac shop has like four.
RowanTolley02 2 years ago
did u not hear? hes on xp.
Bozo695 2 years ago
that is just going to add extra costs and effort...
RowanTolley02 2 years ago
Hey jimmypopjr have you ever had heat issues with your Mac?
1HeartnSoul 2 years ago
Fact is, people are gonna talk shit on apple forever. They are just jealous or stupid idiots that can't afford one or just play pc games all day long.
sean1256 2 years ago 2
Or we shit talk apple because we can find products better then it that have better hardware and the software is easy to toggle into OSX. Mac is just overpriced, and there are so many articles on Apple asking Microsoft to stop there commercials because its greatly impacting there market.
Brechnar100 2 years ago
You know what? Honest to god, i'm done making comments on any of this shit. You're not gonna convince me that apple sucks and i'm not gonna convince you that microsoft sucks. I absolutely love my macbook and will continue to support apple because they make quality products and give great customer support. If they didn't, they wouldn't be around because they DO cost more, but they are EXCELLENT machines. I don't give a fuck what you microsoft fanboys believe.
sean1256 2 years ago 2
Im not a microsoft fanboy. I have the new macbook pro, and i was dissappointed with it because everything i was able to do with it i could easy do 3 times better in Windows. Plus , an alienware machine with unibody and all around metal costs half the price of a macbook and tears it apart. And FFS why dont they have the removable battery.
Brechnar100 2 years ago
They're not gamers machines - just a thought? Dont be disappointed, you have windows on it too right? So now you can do your stuff "3 times better"
chilled99 2 years ago
English must be your second language.
Brechnar100 2 years ago
lol... so you agree they're not gamers machines and that doing your "stuff 3 times better" makes no sense given they run Windows as well. If your "stuff" is games, why didn't u get an Alienware for half price?
erm, did I miss something or shall I retype in Chinese?
Or did you not check the specs before you bought it? I doubt being of unibody construction makes a difference to drivers, graphicscards and operating systems. I'm guessing though.
Removable battery... yeah, thats abit annoying.
chilled99 2 years ago
Sorry , if i meant to say that i was able to game better i would have said gaming, not stuff. Durrrrr. The "stuff" i was referring to was audio recording and editing , video recording and editting , along with being able to easily compose DVDs and so on. And an Alienware is half the price of a macbook and out does it.
Brechnar100 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your a douchebag. lol
Ace33blue 2 years ago
youd prefer a removeable battery with 3 or 4 hours less juice? i think not....
dwranson 2 years ago
thank you!!!!!!!
nyckillaheat 2 years ago
i doubt it 'greatly impacting' their sales dude.... i really really doubt anyone cares about windows commercials
dwranson 2 years ago
what up Jimmy, tell me man, playing crysis how much yours u can get ?
I wanna understand about the 7 hours like apple says...
Mabohemme 2 years ago
You aren't gonna get 7 hours on ANY laptop battery running crysis. Those stats are based on low productivity without even having internet on.
sean1256 2 years ago
I get about 3 hours playing tf2 on the 17 model
th4tkid 2 years ago
hey what's the res on?
columbosoftserve 2 years ago
What's this about macs cant game?
aegnt09 2 years ago 2
Hello, sorry if this sounds stupid but are the graphics better than xbox 360 on them settings that you just had?
Thanks
alvistengelis 2 years ago
Yes they are.
BridgerGLambert 2 years ago 2
those frames are nice, but if i were you i would drop the textures to medium, and put the shaders on medium as well, because Crysis looks like shit with shaders on low.
00joe 2 years ago
Are you using a xbox 360 controller?
jakelowe15 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GAMING IS ALL ABOUT THE GPU...
ASUS W90 Series W90Vp-X1 on newegg for $2,200.
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 2.8GHz
18.4" 1920x1080 resolution
6gb DDR2 800mhz
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
320GB 7200rpm harddrive
this laptop might not be pretty like a mac but it has a spectacular GPU. and read reviews from newegg. People play games with max quality at 1920x1080 resolution.
Anandtech shows that ATI 4870 x2 gets 35fps at 1920x1080 on VERY HIGH.
why buy a mac to attempt this silliness?
eternalkp 2 years ago
Great, so you're going to lug the 18" laptop around? For the price, the MacBook Pro may not be the best, but Apple's build quality is just outstanding. I guarantee you will not find anything that's better quality than an Apple computer. Look at how much they fit into the laptop and how thin it is.
CompsciWiz 2 years ago
where can i get that game
ckedaziut 2 years ago
piratebay
Moora9 2 years ago
double dongs R us
GenuineVanillaFace 2 years ago
sweeeeet
taycuhtoe 3 years ago
THis Laptop Sucks for the price, no offence but you can get an P-6860 for 630 to 1k dollars and it gives you from 17 to 25 Fps with all In Very high Dx10 using Vista, i Have dual boot and i tried ur Configuration and it gives me around 60 Fps Vsync on , exept on some parts that it lowers to 49- 45
degaudenzi07 3 years ago
it may not be a fantastic value for the price from a gamer's perspective, however, it is for many others. I think it's cool that the new macbooks game playing capability was greatly increased compared to the last generation so that consumers have the option to still decently play games while having a macbook and all the applications and practicability that makes a mac a mac.
recalcitrantslave 3 years ago 3
i agree, but also add the fact that apple's build quality is the best you'll ever find =)
dinjin201 2 years ago
i agree, and whoever buys a macbook pro most definately doesnt intend it for playing games only :P
I'm still waiting for mine to arrive :( i ordered on the 24th, its gonna arrive on the 4th :'(
thedeagle3 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
shut up dude.
seriously.
MikeMayhem1234 2 years ago
Shaders are the most important thing in Crysis.
xentrox 3 years ago 3
What resolution are you running it at?
Zackplanet42 3 years ago
Looks pathetic with low shaders
dividedpixels 3 years ago
hmm yea.... looks lame without shaders.
frantischek 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What game is this?
XxkobyxX 3 years ago
Um...let me guess, Crysis?
Awesomeboyman 3 years ago 2
lol i thought that he meant like a bad thing about the macbook
XxkobyxX 3 years ago 3
in this game shadows and shaders are the hardest things for computers to render. on a low end iMac (3GB ram, hd 2400xt 128MB, C2D 2GHz Windows Vista) This game runs fine maxed out (very high) , except shadows and shaders low. the moment I bring those up, 10fps! and DX 10 just about halves the frame rate of DX9. This game only starts to get pretty with shaders and shadows on high. medium and low are UGLY!.
GeekyNerd27 3 years ago
guys hemight have upgraded it to 2.8ghz
naruto01048 3 years ago
whats better to run through boot camp on the same macbook pro model for games this dude has vista or xp??
and how well would the graphics card with 256mb memory take crysis
joeylebo 3 years ago
Oh man, big improvement over the previous gen. I still love my 8600 gt though :]
MinimeDrummerBoi 3 years ago
how much is your cpu? 2.5 ghz?
TFOP2007 3 years ago
thats pretty cool a friend of mine tried to play crisis on a samsung r590 with a 2.4 intel centrino 2. 2gb of DDR3 1066 and the same 9x graphics card and it bogged his down at this setting a bit. there was some lag. io want to try this on my intel 2.6 MBP on 4 gb of ram to see how it fairs. it has an 8600m GPU which is essentailly the same chip as the 9600m. (G92 chip is really a renamed G80)
chernobyl01 3 years ago
what is your graphic card memory? 512 or 256?
albert2090 3 years ago
they are 512. it is a 9600m series i believe off the top of my head
chernobyl01 3 years ago
thats cool and all. I mean I can only run on my laptop with 13 fps all low on 1024 x 768 but....
shaders are what make crysis (and most games) look good. When you drop that you lose most of your graphical bang. If I were you I would get shaders on medium and put some other things down a bit. I think overall it would end up looking better.
Iwillkillyou35 3 years ago
wow that runs really well i have a 07 macbook pro and i get around 20 fps on medium at not full resolution but it is more than plyable
swiftlegend 3 years ago
Hey guys - I'll test with shaders to high and shadows to low, see how that holds. I know the game doesn't look as nice with shaders down, but it's a beautiful game either way. I'd rather play with a steady freamerate than with better settings. Obviously MBPs aren't designed to replace your gaming rig, so there will have to be some compromise.
jimmypopjr 3 years ago 5
lol when u put Shaders to low, the quality of everything else drops to low
vasilibaev 3 years ago
I'm a mac owner and I have vids on here. I was impressed until you said you have the shadows and shaders on low. That defeats the purpose of this game. Have you tried updating your graphic card's drivers in XP? I really wanna get this laptop within the next couple of weeks... but now I'm debating. Also... what's the resolution you have it set at and is XP professional the only copy of XP that will default to the 9600 card or are their ways around that, or does XP Home support that too?
standrick 3 years ago
the macbook pro can handle crysis pretty good, the fraps just slows it down, so don't use fraps. I can run crysis warhead maxed out in 1200/800 resolution and shadow and shaders set in medium with vsync. it runs pretty well
diedplayinggame 3 years ago
Do you think the new macbook pro 2.4 GHZ 4GB
Would play crysis basically just as good as this?
GradeItReviews 3 years ago
Yep, not a huge difference
You would be fine
Discoswine 3 years ago
Oh Cool :D!
I've just ordered my Macbook Pro now, pitty I have to wait untill Christmas to have it :(
I'm going to sell my Macbook (white last generation) so I can get my money back up :)!
Thanks again! :D
GradeItReviews 3 years ago
Could you post the last stage or when it gets REALLY intense near the end game. Because it dips the FPS really low for my penyr system.
seasonalocean 3 years ago
this there a big performance difference between this and the entry model?
vd853 3 years ago
man i gotta get my hands on one of those!
DefaultEclipse 3 years ago
I recently chose the new MBP over a PC...but for the same $ as a MBP you could get a tricked out PC w/ Blu Ray player, HD resolution / HD Screen...really sick shit...but I realized I don't really need that stuff...only use computer for basic stuff and a little gaming...so I went with the MBP
Nilsen581 3 years ago
u did the right thing bro!!!! =D pc sucks!! even though it has blue ray n hd its not worth it!!
focus1234567890 3 years ago
sorry for the stupid question but i am deciding whether to get a pc or the new pro, idk but is the price worth it for the mac?
victg93 3 years ago
Mac's are always worth it.
marksapollo 3 years ago
Not a stupid question at all, since it's a lot of money.
To me macs offer everything in what I'm looking for in a computer. It really depends on what you want to do. Any video/photo work, macs are great. Gaming? Not so much, but that's changing. The new Macbook Pros are starting to hold their own, and it will only get better.
PCs have better third party support and allow you to really build your system the way you want it.
good luck!
jimmypopjr 3 years ago
Just keep in mind, if you go with the mac, you still can have windows (bootcamp). It's the best of both worlds.
Jmanmadness23 3 years ago
hi, could you tell me plz whether thats the 512mb 9600gt or the 256 9600gt? thanks.
highcrash57 3 years ago
512mb 9600gt
marksapollo 3 years ago
CLB: 1024x768 is what it defaulted to. Native Res I guess?
Mark: I would say the bump to 2.8 isn't worth the extra cash if you're just thinking of gaming. As for Vista and DX10, it'll probably vary by game, but if you do go with Vista I would make sure you go with 4GB of memory.
jimmypopjr 3 years ago
Thanks Jimmy. Well I already have XP so may just stick with it for the moment. The 2.53 will be fine for all I do, I do a bit of video encoding but only films, I don't use Final Cut or anything. I do like less heat and better battery life which from the reviews I've read the 2.8 uses slightly more power. I will be playing lots of games though :) You're Crysis vid has seriously impressed me, the 2.53 can certainly handle it.
marksapollo 3 years ago
On which resolution dit you play?
CLB8421 3 years ago
Thanks for doing this. I will be getting the new Mac Book pro very soon also. Can you tell me though, is the 2.8ghz CPU worth it and also is it better to use Vista for DX10 graphics or should I stick with XP? Money is fine but if there's no difference then I would like to know. Thanks
marksapollo 3 years ago
YES it CAN run! But... it can run TETRIS too. LOL!!!!
EvgenyZuev 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What THINKs mac users obout PC users that try to run MAC OS X on there PCs? - Thay say - PC users are crazy.
So we say obout you the same too. CRYSIS - desinged with so perfect and SOOO beautiful graphics running on Vista, DX10.. its fully computer revolution in game industry. Its MUST BE seeing on PC with the best quality settings. So what YOU jimmypopjr demonstration here to us??? BUL SHET.
Your graphics settings are disgusting. Be not ashamed and be not praised by it. A shame mac users!
EvgenyZuev 3 years ago
Show me a laptop that can run Crysis on ultra...
sc0pl355 3 years ago
Nice thanks for putting that up jimmy!
ultimo119 3 years ago