BLIMP TV: SEYMOUR TRUTH - SEX ACT vs. PATRIOT ACT

[032312200]

good

[Crypto7Jocko0]

Could Semore sing, "THANK YOU GOD FOR GASOLINE. I COULD USE A FEW GALLONS IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN." In the Johnny Paycheck style of Country music.

[ballpark4]

israel Is not theReal deal they are the synaque of sat in lol.. Even Jews kno this anti semite and anti zionist, khazar, jesuits is totally diffrent God knows whats up..

[112namrepus]

RON PAUL will fix it all!

[Roenazarrek]

Hmm well he fixed our Ron Paul problem by dropping out of the race, points for that.

[112namrepus]

RON PAUL is still in. !

[Roenazarrek]

Not in the republican party. Lets see when was the last time someone won the precidency or even came remotly close withotu being in one of the two top parties....

NEVER

[Akoshee]

"backwoodsmister", It's called a right to privacy!! and by the way owning a scanner in illegal, so listening to my cellphone conversation should rank right up there. And prvacy IS an "essential liberty". And how the hell is it a conspiricy if they came right out and said they ARE and HAVE BEEN wire tapping with out our forknowlage and without consent. It would seem the only "DOUCHEBAG" here is you! You need to try more brain , less mouth!!!

[Akoshee]

**conspiracy

[backwoodsmister]

"Akoshee," Not only did you misspell "CONSPIRACY," not only are you so fucking STUPID that you claim we are guaranteed "the right to privacy," (Google: "The right to privacy: is it protected?") but you show what an utter retard you are when you claim scanners are "illegal." Go to the RadioShack website, type in "Police Scanner." Radio waves are FREE and I can listen to the cops, and hear cell conversations of douches like you telling the world how "smart" they are. Quit smoking crack, asshole.

[Akoshee]

"backwoodsmister", if you could figure out how to read, you would see that I have already corrected my spelling of the word "CONSPIRACY", but you have such a hard on to prove you're self an douchebag, that you must have missed it!!! And you are right, scanners are not illegal in ALL 50 states, but then again it's still legal to carry a fire-arm in AZ so that doesn't say much. The right to privacy is protected as it concerns unautherized access to "private" property. So go die in fire!!!

[backwoodsmister]

"Asso-shee," you have done a complete 180 degrees on your arguments, therefore conceding your DOUCHE-NESS. Yes, unauthorized access to private property is protected, but you must be too stupid to discern the difference between that & listening in to phone conversations through an "illegal" scanner. You are wrong on all counts and have furthermore shown yourself to be the biggest DOUCHE ever, and should adhrere to your own comment, "more brain, less mouth." You my friend are a Class-A dimwit.

[backwoodsmister]

Those of you who think wiretapping is un-Constitutional are just fucking stupid. Talking on the phone does not an "essential liberty" make. You dumb fucks probably don't even realize that for $50, I can buy a scanner & legally listen in to your cellphone conversations, clear as a bell. Your essential liberties are not threatened, you overzealous conspiracy cocksuckers! So stop cut-and-pasting your stupid fucking Jefferson quotes & have an original thought for a change. DOUCHEBAGS...

[Cfossedal]

It IS unconstitutional in spirit if not in fact. The fourth ammendment guarantees the right to one's person and personal effects, and the ninth specifies that the bill of rights is not to be construed in such a way as to restrict the rights of the people.

If all else fails, there's the 10th.

Oh, by the way: "The people are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty." -Thomas Jefferson

[backwoodsmister]

"Unconstitutional in SPIRIT??" This is merely your opinion, which apparently the Supreme Court disagrees with at present, so I guess you support our Constitution only when the courts agree with YOUR view of things? Oh yeah, here is one: "Every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans, and must be that of every free state."--T. Jefferson. But you LEFTIES don't like that one, DO YOU? How about, "If our house be on fire... we must try to extinguish it..."--T.J.

[Cfossedal]

Whether the Supreme Court disagrees or not is irrelavant as far as the interpretation of the Constitution is concerned; the only legitimate interpretation of articles is the one that was originally set forth: that the the ruling powers only derive their powers from the consent of the governed. I do only support the GOVERNMENT when it supports the only legitimate interpretation of the Constitution, which is very clear.

BTW: I am RIGHT-WING, and I DO believe that everyone should be a soldier.

[backwoodsmister]

"Cfossedal," it seems you only agree with CERTAIN parts of our Constitution. You are in disagreement with the part that sets aside the Supreme Court as the entity that ultimately decides Constitutional rulings. How the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution is FAR from irrelevant, my friend. It was so relevant to the Founding Fathers that they laid it all out very clearly so opinions like yours could not decide to do away with them. So, the ONLY legitimate interpretation IS made by the court.

[Finnigan9]

Does that mean you don't love me anymore???

[ut00bguru]

damn youtube and there damn comment limitations!!!!!!!!!!!!

if we get drafted we need to revolt!!!!!!!!

[ballpark4]

somebody is on the payrolll. You can send yourselve to Iran if tats how you feel.. I on the oher hand am telling all my military friends to get out while they still can cuz iran is next but for the same reasons we still in iraq... Jesuits...

[ballpark4]

lol funnnyyyy

[leatherneck1010]

what a fucking faggot

[fenterson]

Idiot.

[akinfurno]

I love it!!! fuuunnny as hell 5*'s

[TheMessageStupid]

i like the satire, good stuff