@SenorSpode Surely you don't believe that boeing as an American gov contractor isn't using the technology that "you" the tax payer paid for in R&D on their passenger planes? If they relied solely on passenger plane sales instead of military as well, they would have been out of business a long time ago.
@NASCARRELIC Wow, that's a rather anti-American comment from a NASCAR relic. You're that eager to go back to what your forefathers fought to get away from? Hell, the 787 has 840 orders, enough to pay for itself. The 747-8 has over 100 and it's paid for itself time and time again. You can go back to playing with your cute little Frog planes, son...I think we'll do just fine without you.
737 to every Boeing fan is an aircraft that needs to go in an museum as an antique. 737 is an dangerous plane to travel . If you love your life go and sit in some other aircraft. This is now nothing but rusted antique of 70s. Recently in Jamaica a rusted 737-800 of the 70s and 80s crashed. LOL the engine fell off, and the wheel collapsed LOL.Check it out American airlines DEC 22, 2009
2 crashes in a row in 2009. One in Feb 2009 Turkish Airlines 737-800 and one on 22 Dec 2009 American Airlines 737-800. The first crash broke the Turkish airlines to 3 pieces and killed many. The second crash for AA 737-800 after landing, the engine fell off from the wing then the wheel collapsed, then the plane overshoot the runway. So do you think that the plane called 737 is safe. It should retire. It is more then a decade old and has taken many lives then all the Airbus 3times combined!
American made aircrafts isnt safe. Only thing Americans care is money, not safety. 70% of all aircraft accidents are caused of American made planes. European planes are more safe, but they are more expensive and less popular in aircraft companies. Finn air buys these expensive planes and it can be seen on aircraft accident countings. Finn Air have never been on accident which have killed people.
@fachy1981 Did you know that B737 have much more flight hours&aircrafts built than any other commercial jet? Because of that it have many crashes too, and that doesnt make it unsafe, its safe.
If you mean Finnair, they had some crashes when their name was Aero, sixties.
Any commercial jet is safe when maintenance is good and pilots too.
@fachy1981 Boeing 737 have MORE flight hours than ANY other commercial plane, more B737´s have manufacturer than any other commercial plane, SO of course it have more crashes than other commercial jets when it flies more than any other commercial jet. Those facts about how much it have killed tells nothing about safety.
If you choose random flight, you have biggest probability to fly with B737, and when it flies more than any other jet, of course also crashes happened to it more often.
@fachy1981 Do U know who the worst killers of sentient beings of the world are? Icelandic murdering fucktards like U who kill + eat defenseless whales. Icleanders R scumbags + I have been to your hit Island so U can by Icelandic sweaters. New T Shirts says Icelanders R murdering whale killers + we should hunt U + your moronic culture in fact we should Nuke Icleand + get a submarine so we can torpedoe whaling ships + than chum for sharks.. How about we harpoon U + your inbred family of icetards?
I got this plane and returned it! It is so unreal. the wings dont flex they are always in the "up" position the windows look fake the VC is O.K. But it does not look like the real one. its tail looks nothing like the real thing and textures dont look like boeing dreamliner colors (they have too much black). You Are much better of using the camsim 787 They have the best one so far, but I hear projectopen sky is making one but I dont know the release date for it.
AircraftCompare DOTcom provides exact details of around every aircraft in the world from the past present to the FUTURE FLYING CARS, with photos specs price and everything else. Compare side by side the Boeing 747 and the Airbus A380 or the MIG with the F16 etc, get access to category wise airplane and helicopter rankings, meet the prominent figures from the aerospace industry through the community..
Car from GM gets fucked at 30,000 miles, then how would you expect these trash airplanes(air-junk) from Boeing to survive. First make better cars, then come and talk. Europe Rules!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
American made aircrafts isnt safe. Only thing Americans care is money, not safety. 70% of all aircraft accidents are caused of American made planes. European planes are more safe, but they are more expensive and less popular in aircraft companies. Finn air buys these expensive planes and it can be seen on aircraft accident countings. Finn Air have never been on accident which have killed people.
Thats actually not true. The A380 will never be mass produced like the 747 because it is so large and impractical. The 747 is outdated but with the new 787, y1 and y3 Boeing will give airlines variety in which planes they can fly.
Although the A350 is a little better than the 787 there is talk that Boeing is secretly developing a 787-10 which will be much better of an aircraft than the a350. Also the a350 is too big for this type of economy, because less people are flying long routes.
Boeing is 10 years behind Airbus. Airlines that use 747-400 will be looking to upgrade in the new future and it seems A380 is the most popular choice. Airlines don't just want another 747 derivitive. They want a completely new airliner.
Now with the delays of 787 it seems A350will enter market 2-3 years after 787 which should make for an interesting market. A350 can also take advantage of building second making A350 with slightly better technologies than 787.
First of all, Airbus is so scared by Boeing that they pushed out an imperfect plane (A380) into service and they're getting flak for it. Ask Emirates and Qantas about it. Second of all, Airbus doesn't care, because the French taxpayers wipe their asses if they fail. Boeing makes every design work because they have no one to bail them out. Mark my words, the A380 programme will fail; they need to make 400 A380s to break even; they never will.
747-8 is not going to be very successful. The last time an airline bought an 747-400 was in 2004(I think) and orders for 747-8 are slim(when compared to A380). A380 will make air travel much cheaper than it is currently because a full A380 makes more money than any other airliner that is currently in service. An A380 starts making profit at 65% full capacity!
Well when those 747 need to be replaced do you think airlines will choose the outdated and older 747-8 airframe that has less passenger capacity, less passenger comfort and doing all of this while using more fuel per passenger.
The choice is obvious. Airlines will choose A380. Once you have flown in A380, you will never want to fly in 747 again. The next wave of A380 will be even more efficient. In the future we can look to many improvements being made in the A380 airframe!
@SenorSpode Good point btw BOEING ROCKS Keep it up Boeing! Airbus fails because Boeing already has thier "dreamliner" in the air while Airbus still has thier version in concepts XD
Yeah, that is horrendous. Why would people pay for this waste of HDD space?
If I'm not mistaken, Project Opensky has a freeware 787 in house colors. Granted, it has no VC and it uses the Triple Seven Panels and gauges, but its probably the best 787 at the moment. Full movement surfaces, lighting effects, wing flex (through not as extreme as this).
@mobius5759 abacus has come out with a 787 but im a little hesitant to buy it cause well its abacus but the screenshots look good and has a nice looking vc
WIth all due respect to the company, I have also purchased from abacus, and considering the quality of Flight Sims and Add-on aircraft these days, they are still way behind the mark.
What a bad version of the dreamliner. This is made from the oldes picture that was available of the 787 and the designers thougt that the wings were curved always instead of in flight only. And even in flight they dont curve that much.
Good thing I got this as a torrent, because it's a joke. Never pay for this product, Abacus are just stealing from us by releasing this shit. The wings aren't even like that when the plane is stationary. Absolute rubbish.
Well, this is not the 787: it's the RIDICULE Abacus 787, based on the oldest thiking of what should be a 787. Unfortunatelly, people continue to buy this extremelly unrealistic model because "it's a payware from Abacus, should be good". I hope you have downloaded it for free, at least... And by the way, what a lost of time in see the plane accelerating and braking huh? Wow.
there are really not that curved- when it takes of and lands a little but not that much. the person who made this Flight Simulator did not make it good cause they don't curve that much
I looked on wikipedia to make sure I wasn't blowing smoke... and yes, the 87 will replace routes covered by the 57, but they aren't similar in design. the 757 fuselage is the same diameter as the 737 and 727. thought I'd clarify =)
the 787 Dreamliner was made to replace the old 757s. it has a very similar design, but it can hold at least 30 more passengers and has a range between 2500 and 8500 miles, depending on the model. in other words, it's a 21st century remake of the 757.
the 757 is a single aisle jet. also called a narrow body. the 787 is a wide body, a "twin aisle". it is to replace the 767 fleet, and was introduced to go for airbus' jugular. not to sound like a know-it-all asswipe, but my father was an advisor on the sonic cruiser and the dreamliner engineer panels. once it gets passed the birthing pains, and the labor strike lol, it will be a world beater!!!!
are u sick, a 757 is a narrowbody aircraft meaning it has 1 aisle and the 787 has 2 aisles wich means it is a widebody! 2 completely airplanes! do ur homework buddy!
first of all that has nothing to do with widebody and narrowbody aircraft second of all a -3 is designed for domestic routes and once again do ur homework buddy and stop tyrnna be cocky cause ive done mine, because i am an aircraft mechanic! what areU???
The 787 Dream Liner is a twin engine (Rolls Royce Trent 1000) mid size airliner smart guy..
The Dream LIFTER which transports parts that make up the Dream Liner is a modified Boeing 747 Cargo Plain.. I suggest next time you get your facts straight idiot.
A U.S. Air Force decision awarding a $35 billion aircraft contract to a team including the European parent of Airbus landed like a bomb in Congress on Friday, drawing howls of protest from lawmakers aligned with the loser, America's Boeing Co.
The Congressional delegation from the Seattle area said they were "outraged." Kansas Republican Rep. Todd Tiahrt vowed to seek a review of the decision "at the highest levels of the Pentagon and Congress" in hopes of reversing it.
Yeah, Grunman and EADS are building up the first new airplane-factory in US since 40 years in the area of Mobile, creating more then 5000 new jobs.
Speaking of Boeing and some politicians in Washington: they do not care about new jobs, higher quality or better airplanes for the U.S. Air Force. It's just about more earnings for Boeing.
ID these cartoons in the title pls
alienhuman 6 months ago
fuck this flightsim shit
runwax 8 months ago
@SenorSpode Surely you don't believe that boeing as an American gov contractor isn't using the technology that "you" the tax payer paid for in R&D on their passenger planes? If they relied solely on passenger plane sales instead of military as well, they would have been out of business a long time ago.
Stop being such a blind sycophant.
HugoBossUnzipped 10 months ago
why are the wings up like that like if the airplane is flying ?
istiiizzz 1 year ago
inb4 people fighting over Airbus and Boeing!
Oh, wait...
FlamingDoubleDs 1 year ago
vergaaaaa
xxxmanuelxxx 1 year ago
@NASCARRELIC Wow, that's a rather anti-American comment from a NASCAR relic. You're that eager to go back to what your forefathers fought to get away from? Hell, the 787 has 840 orders, enough to pay for itself. The 747-8 has over 100 and it's paid for itself time and time again. You can go back to playing with your cute little Frog planes, son...I think we'll do just fine without you.
SenorSpode 1 year ago
Where did you download that 787 for fsx?
UltimateAviator 1 year ago
*your meant to pull up... :)
AeroSpace737 1 year ago
737 to every Boeing fan is an aircraft that needs to go in an museum as an antique. 737 is an dangerous plane to travel . If you love your life go and sit in some other aircraft. This is now nothing but rusted antique of 70s. Recently in Jamaica a rusted 737-800 of the 70s and 80s crashed. LOL the engine fell off, and the wheel collapsed LOL.Check it out American airlines DEC 22, 2009
fachy1981 1 year ago
2 crashes in a row in 2009. One in Feb 2009 Turkish Airlines 737-800 and one on 22 Dec 2009 American Airlines 737-800. The first crash broke the Turkish airlines to 3 pieces and killed many. The second crash for AA 737-800 after landing, the engine fell off from the wing then the wheel collapsed, then the plane overshoot the runway. So do you think that the plane called 737 is safe. It should retire. It is more then a decade old and has taken many lives then all the Airbus 3times combined!
fachy1981 1 year ago
American made aircrafts isnt safe. Only thing Americans care is money, not safety. 70% of all aircraft accidents are caused of American made planes. European planes are more safe, but they are more expensive and less popular in aircraft companies. Finn air buys these expensive planes and it can be seen on aircraft accident countings. Finn Air have never been on accident which have killed people.
fachy1981 1 year ago
prove that americans don't care about safety
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
@fachy1981 Did you know that B737 have much more flight hours&aircrafts built than any other commercial jet? Because of that it have many crashes too, and that doesnt make it unsafe, its safe.
If you mean Finnair, they had some crashes when their name was Aero, sixties.
Any commercial jet is safe when maintenance is good and pilots too.
Pvjinflight 1 year ago
@Pvjinflight Which´s the BEST Life Killing plane ever?: The Boeing 737= 5900 Casualties.
Which´s the FASTEST Life Killing plane ever?: The Boeing 737= 2,5 casualties per month.
There you have Boeing beating the competition...The Best and the Fastest all at ONCE.
To save ur life...just avoid the KILLER 737.
fachy1981 1 year ago
@fachy1981 Boeing 737 have MORE flight hours than ANY other commercial plane, more B737´s have manufacturer than any other commercial plane, SO of course it have more crashes than other commercial jets when it flies more than any other commercial jet. Those facts about how much it have killed tells nothing about safety.
If you choose random flight, you have biggest probability to fly with B737, and when it flies more than any other jet, of course also crashes happened to it more often.
Pvjinflight 1 year ago
@fachy1981 And Crashes can happen to any plane, almost always reason to crash is pilot error or bad maintenance/other error, but not planes fault.
Look that:
Boeing 737 have flown from year 1967, 6,348 delivered.
"There are on average 1,250 737s airborne at any given time, with one departing or landing somewhere every five seconds.["
A320, first flew 1987, and first delivered 1988.
4,291 A320 family built, which includes A318, A319, And A320, A321.
B737 have flown longer time and more.
Pvjinflight 1 year ago
@fachy1981 Do U know who the worst killers of sentient beings of the world are? Icelandic murdering fucktards like U who kill + eat defenseless whales. Icleanders R scumbags + I have been to your hit Island so U can by Icelandic sweaters. New T Shirts says Icelanders R murdering whale killers + we should hunt U + your moronic culture in fact we should Nuke Icleand + get a submarine so we can torpedoe whaling ships + than chum for sharks.. How about we harpoon U + your inbred family of icetards?
LottoWinner999 10 months ago
@fachy1981 shut the fuck up airbus or should i say scarebus is shit
pilotman088 1 year ago
@pilotman088 Boeing just like junk Ford and Bankrupt GM LOL!
fachy1981 1 year ago
I hope someone like captain sim or something makes a 787
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I got this plane and returned it! It is so unreal. the wings dont flex they are always in the "up" position the windows look fake the VC is O.K. But it does not look like the real one. its tail looks nothing like the real thing and textures dont look like boeing dreamliner colors (they have too much black). You Are much better of using the camsim 787 They have the best one so far, but I hear projectopen sky is making one but I dont know the release date for it.
1967beatlesfan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AircraftCompare DOTcom provides exact details of around every aircraft in the world from the past present to the FUTURE FLYING CARS, with photos specs price and everything else. Compare side by side the Boeing 747 and the Airbus A380 or the MIG with the F16 etc, get access to category wise airplane and helicopter rankings, meet the prominent figures from the aerospace industry through the community..
aircraftcompare 1 year ago
Car from GM gets fucked at 30,000 miles, then how would you expect these trash airplanes(air-junk) from Boeing to survive. First make better cars, then come and talk. Europe Rules!
fachy1981 2 years ago
europe sucks balls scarebus doesn't have the experience that boeing has
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
Ya A380 pissed on all your Boeing aircrafts. Fucken roof comes off after takeoff, and engines fall off after landing LOL.
fachy1981 1 year ago
at least our planes can still fly with no roof
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago 2
and mayby the pilot wanted some air
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
Fuck you,Boeing was building planes before airbus was an itch on europes dick
916fanatic1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
American made aircrafts isnt safe. Only thing Americans care is money, not safety. 70% of all aircraft accidents are caused of American made planes. European planes are more safe, but they are more expensive and less popular in aircraft companies. Finn air buys these expensive planes and it can be seen on aircraft accident countings. Finn Air have never been on accident which have killed people.
fachy1981 2 years ago
@fachy1981 Your full of shit!
leonardo302 2 years ago 10
@fachy1981 man ur full of it ! most of euro planes crash coz of manufacturing and technical probs !!
Michaelnagui 2 years ago 3
Thats actually not true. The A380 will never be mass produced like the 747 because it is so large and impractical. The 747 is outdated but with the new 787, y1 and y3 Boeing will give airlines variety in which planes they can fly.
Although the A350 is a little better than the 787 there is talk that Boeing is secretly developing a 787-10 which will be much better of an aircraft than the a350. Also the a350 is too big for this type of economy, because less people are flying long routes.
sssas13 2 years ago 5
Boeing is 10 years behind Airbus. Airlines that use 747-400 will be looking to upgrade in the new future and it seems A380 is the most popular choice. Airlines don't just want another 747 derivitive. They want a completely new airliner.
Now with the delays of 787 it seems A350will enter market 2-3 years after 787 which should make for an interesting market. A350 can also take advantage of building second making A350 with slightly better technologies than 787.
fachy1981 2 years ago
First of all, Airbus is so scared by Boeing that they pushed out an imperfect plane (A380) into service and they're getting flak for it. Ask Emirates and Qantas about it. Second of all, Airbus doesn't care, because the French taxpayers wipe their asses if they fail. Boeing makes every design work because they have no one to bail them out. Mark my words, the A380 programme will fail; they need to make 400 A380s to break even; they never will.
SenorSpode 2 years ago 5
747-8 is not going to be very successful. The last time an airline bought an 747-400 was in 2004(I think) and orders for 747-8 are slim(when compared to A380). A380 will make air travel much cheaper than it is currently because a full A380 makes more money than any other airliner that is currently in service. An A380 starts making profit at 65% full capacity!
fachy1981 2 years ago
Well when those 747 need to be replaced do you think airlines will choose the outdated and older 747-8 airframe that has less passenger capacity, less passenger comfort and doing all of this while using more fuel per passenger.
The choice is obvious. Airlines will choose A380. Once you have flown in A380, you will never want to fly in 747 again. The next wave of A380 will be even more efficient. In the future we can look to many improvements being made in the A380 airframe!
fachy1981 2 years ago
@SenorSpode How many lateliners boeing have to sell before they get money from 787 project?
Pvjinflight 1 year ago
@SenorSpode Good point btw BOEING ROCKS Keep it up Boeing! Airbus fails because Boeing already has thier "dreamliner" in the air while Airbus still has thier version in concepts XD
AirlinePilotZJ 1 year ago
wow, that box flew a lot, man :P
AIRBUS RULEZ!! :P
clustergarde 2 years ago
@clustergarde nah boeing has way more experience thwn scarebus
yoyoyoyoshua 2 years ago
the wings are too bent looks as if it would fall from the sky if it ever took off, not the real plane but this FS model
86Timewarp 2 years ago
Those wings look like they are going to fall off! lol
OmarThePug 2 years ago
This sucks big fat donkey balls!
ludwigsongs 2 years ago
fuck your fake shit
RollTape52 2 years ago
is it really that big, look how friggin long the back is
ap327145 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear All,
I haver some curious questions:
(1) Why do we love flying in commerical planes?
(2) How does the way of flying prefer by girls different from that for boys?
(3) What kinds of external planting and internal cabin design will be attractive to girls and children? (eg. Micky Mouse/Teddy Bear)
(4) if the inflight entertainment game has "Flying Dumbo" to pilot, will it be attractive to girls and children?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative idea and brainstorm!!!
applesweeter 2 years ago
obviously flight sim video. But the real thing should be happening now.
IdolHans 2 years ago
It sad of the quality.... I wouldnt download this plane if it was FREEWARE!!!
runway34r 2 years ago
come one i downloaded this plane for free the only proplem was the VC's setup the rest was great. HQ sound
FsimulatorX 2 years ago
wings are so bent! lol
totonicone 2 years ago 5
@totonicone: thats because its about to start flapping 'em!
Fishnflightbum 2 years ago
It didn't even fly?!,,,,,, :O
kathen111 2 years ago 2
Brakes test
DK123454 2 years ago
Yeah, that is horrendous. Why would people pay for this waste of HDD space?
If I'm not mistaken, Project Opensky has a freeware 787 in house colors. Granted, it has no VC and it uses the Triple Seven Panels and gauges, but its probably the best 787 at the moment. Full movement surfaces, lighting effects, wing flex (through not as extreme as this).
mobius5759 2 years ago
@mobius5759 abacus has come out with a 787 but im a little hesitant to buy it cause well its abacus but the screenshots look good and has a nice looking vc
navalaviator92 2 years ago
i have downloaded it but how can i use this plane in the game can sum 1 help me
B3l3wis 2 years ago
The wings look like they are continuously in flight, wtf?
pelagic6 2 years ago
The Dreamliner's wings are slightly pointed up for the passengers so thay can have a smoother more enjoyable flight.
hotboi745 2 years ago
Hotboi745, yes, they flex in flight, my point is that the wings look fully flexed when not in flight on this simulator.
pelagic6 2 years ago
Dude just for the record I had no clue what i was saying, that was all total bull shit. Lol.
hotboi745 2 years ago
well when he was on the ground they were still pointed up and they shouldn't be
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
why would you pay for it?
MTran0708 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear All,
I have some questions about psychology:
(1) Why do we enjoy flying "Flight Simulator"?
(2) What does make us to play Flight Simulator over and over again?
(3) What is the fun to flying in a way that can only be accomplish in "Flight Simulator"? (eg. landing an 747 on a carrier on the sea)
(4) Why do we like to fly different models of aeroplanes with different external paintings in different airlines?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
applesweeter 2 years ago
wow im never going to buy from abacus this is the worst model i have ever seen in my life.
bewalker123 2 years ago
WIth all due respect to the company, I have also purchased from abacus, and considering the quality of Flight Sims and Add-on aircraft these days, they are still way behind the mark.
jlebesis 2 years ago
as start autopilot?
numberonetheden 2 years ago
The wings arn't supposed to be flexed like...
rutgersfan7 2 years ago 2
You just burnt out those trent engines, you should kill reverse before 60kts then let the toe-brakes do the rest! Just a friendly observation! :)
markbryans1987 2 years ago
And now you see why Abacus Sucks.
virginianboy1012 2 years ago 3
thats just RTO:) but nice vid:)
Marmalade624 2 years ago
Comment removed
applesweeter 2 years ago
whats wrong with the wings?! there flexing so much and your barley at take off speed let alone moving. you need a better model.
notingboy 2 years ago
the wings don't flex that much in real life but they are flexed in real life quite a bit
shadddey5 2 years ago 2
they are flexed like that in-flight but not on thhe ground
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
well i have this and its payware
AZNFlipy12 2 years ago
umm, what kind of a test was that??? i..it was abit strange, fast taxi?? slow take off?? niice vid though
buresboihowiee 2 years ago
RTO?
YorranSlik 2 years ago 2
that was what boeing did before the first flight
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
@yoyoyoyoshua sounds alot like bull shit to me....
bugguy905 1 year ago
alls abacus duz is take everything default and put it in a different place and overprice it.
LtdBudgetProductions 2 years ago
The new 787 does`nt have the sharks fin tailplane.
gpzb2 2 years ago
thats crap
airbornbtw 2 years ago
if you want a good 787, get one from camsim
firepyro2 2 years ago
naw, the details are shit, and u cant keep the nose level, even on the auto-pilot
torrespilota931 2 years ago
WOW, Is that wing looks like that in the original plane?
raykrislianggi 2 years ago
i think yes
filipe026 2 years ago
no, not quite so curved in my opinion. i think its only supposed to be curved at the tip, not the whole thing.
havenhood 2 years ago 2
I think that's what it's suppose to look like during flight.
maxsuperdudeisawesom 2 years ago
Yes..... Wing flex isn't it? But I'm just saying that Boeing 787 Will be more Beautiful if the wing is like that when it taxiing =)
raykrislianggi 2 years ago
What a bad version of the dreamliner. This is made from the oldes picture that was available of the 787 and the designers thougt that the wings were curved always instead of in flight only. And even in flight they dont curve that much.
Evillian151 2 years ago 3
Good thing I got this as a torrent, because it's a joke. Never pay for this product, Abacus are just stealing from us by releasing this shit. The wings aren't even like that when the plane is stationary. Absolute rubbish.
Gidien2000 2 years ago 3
Ya, you are right. Abacus suck.
Pvjinflight 2 years ago
ya this is lik a 777-200, 787, and EMB-190 crossbred
silverboots000 2 years ago
Well, this is not the 787: it's the RIDICULE Abacus 787, based on the oldest thiking of what should be a 787. Unfortunatelly, people continue to buy this extremelly unrealistic model because "it's a payware from Abacus, should be good". I hope you have downloaded it for free, at least... And by the way, what a lost of time in see the plane accelerating and braking huh? Wow.
smartalpha 2 years ago 2
Where did you get this aircraft for fs9???
unitedva 2 years ago
its easy he just got the textures plane. thats it no cockpit or vc thats why he never showed it
SickoZone 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahaha what the fuck is this??? hahahahahahahahahahah look at the wings hahahahahaa its like a bird.... up down up down hahahaha
Nedun375 2 years ago
its suppose to
SickoZone 2 years ago
Are the wings really that curved? :O
fafakuk 2 years ago
Yes, when theres enough lift.
A380sebster 2 years ago
there are really not that curved- when it takes of and lands a little but not that much. the person who made this Flight Simulator did not make it good cause they don't curve that much
TheLiLD95 2 years ago
what's that i thinked you'll fly
samsungi900omnia 2 years ago
ok it could be, but i can`t imagine that this kind of wings we will se in the next years at the airports of the world.
Muehlenmann111 3 years ago
the wings don`t look very realistic!?
Muehlenmann111 3 years ago
there differnt type of wings called raked wings and they really are on the real 787
umahuma4 3 years ago
i know they bow up in the air, but i don't think they do on the ground, watch the roll-out video
tomtom5418 3 years ago
at least not to that extent
tomtom5418 3 years ago
Ya, for fuel efficiency like winglets.
A380sebster 2 years ago
Anyone know where I can get a 787 Dreamliner for FSX for free?
angrysausage123 3 years ago
i can send you file..
letsgogiants1993 3 years ago
Awesome, in email? Or is it too large to email? Do you use windows live messenger?
angrysausage123 3 years ago
can u send it to me too?
MarblesStudios 3 years ago
email
letsgogiants1993 3 years ago
fs-freeware(dot)net they have many many free planes. just click FSX on top left and type in 787.
sparky0083 3 years ago
Awesome thanks!
angrysausage123 3 years ago
uhhh...... first off, what the heck is up with those wings.... and all I see is a 777 with 767 landing gears and wings bent upwards
sweetsf4life 3 years ago
I have several psychology questions.
Why people love flying??? Why we love aeroplane??? Why airbus sing "the way we fly" in its TV advertisement???
Thank you in advance if someone can give me some ideas.
applesweeter 3 years ago
bullshit, that´s 777 nose and windshield, and wings don´t flex at that speed.
arquimedon 3 years ago
yeah too much bend!
but still nice vid 4/5!
BulgarianInCanada 3 years ago
The wings don't flex anywhere near like that on the ground.. thats pathetic. Another shite abacus model.
SMA380 3 years ago
Abacus maked another sh*t
Villenthretenmerth 3 years ago
"Maked"?
TennisChamp59 3 years ago
fs bends the wings more than the real thing.
alex62495 3 years ago
where did you download it?
Fendibsonphone 3 years ago
sorry brother. the 767 is wider and a little longer. the 777 and 767 are similar in design, but the 57 and 67 are worlds apart.
Ricardodelamuerte 3 years ago
I looked on wikipedia to make sure I wasn't blowing smoke... and yes, the 87 will replace routes covered by the 57, but they aren't similar in design. the 757 fuselage is the same diameter as the 737 and 727. thought I'd clarify =)
Ricardodelamuerte 3 years ago
the wings are beautiful
MoonpigStar 3 years ago 2
Freaking ugly wings!
Diartoo 3 years ago
ok pass the test
Fuckdencio 3 years ago
fucking hell, why are the wings like that?
Mazza4Azza 3 years ago
Look at the detail on that! It even says in small letters "Dreamliner"!
IzzySimmons 3 years ago
The dreamliners nose en wings are different!!!.
miertenspooky 3 years ago
that looks exactly like a 757
polak4lyf 3 years ago 2
the 787 Dreamliner was made to replace the old 757s. it has a very similar design, but it can hold at least 30 more passengers and has a range between 2500 and 8500 miles, depending on the model. in other words, it's a 21st century remake of the 757.
AmericanImmaturity 3 years ago 2
the 757 is a single aisle jet. also called a narrow body. the 787 is a wide body, a "twin aisle". it is to replace the 767 fleet, and was introduced to go for airbus' jugular. not to sound like a know-it-all asswipe, but my father was an advisor on the sonic cruiser and the dreamliner engineer panels. once it gets passed the birthing pains, and the labor strike lol, it will be a world beater!!!!
Ricardodelamuerte 3 years ago
well, also remember, that the 757 and 767 were made with a very similar design plan, and are pretty much in the same family.
AmericanImmaturity 3 years ago
are u sick, a 757 is a narrowbody aircraft meaning it has 1 aisle and the 787 has 2 aisles wich means it is a widebody! 2 completely airplanes! do ur homework buddy!
Beatbot304 3 years ago
don't be calling me sick! why do you think the 787-3 has only 2,500 to 3,500 miles range? looks like u need to do ur homework!
AmericanImmaturity 3 years ago
first of all that has nothing to do with widebody and narrowbody aircraft second of all a -3 is designed for domestic routes and once again do ur homework buddy and stop tyrnna be cocky cause ive done mine, because i am an aircraft mechanic! what areU???
Beatbot304 3 years ago
ummm...r u replying to the right person? because i don't remember u at all.
AmericanImmaturity 3 years ago
Are the wings rely shaped that way? Or is it beacuse this is an animation?
westindude 3 years ago
they really are shaped that way
fabian152006 3 years ago
They look more normal on the ground, but once in the air they turn into the more curved shape.
Eskimops 3 years ago
its all in the "composites"
oneofthemdeals 3 years ago 2
what do you mean
lizocola93 3 years ago
does any one know where i can go to download the 787 aircraft to my fsx ....with the aqual cockpit
lizocola93 3 years ago
You can get the Abacus Fly the Boeing 787, but its payware, but i'd be happy to send it to you.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
they arent shaped that way... watch 787 dreamliner roll-out
airplanefreak25 3 years ago
yea, thats what they look like in flight, not on the ground.
varifrank(dot)com/images/787Dreamliner.jpg
Airportchris2 3 years ago
they r shaped that way
mutinda006 3 years ago
i think
mutinda006 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fuck you Fsx
dr1gba 3 years ago
The a350 is just a copy of the 787.
Eskimops 3 years ago 3
my fav plane
MTran0708 3 years ago
looks classier and smoother than the heavy airbus.
NSJATT 3 years ago
shit
bigjay290386 3 years ago
Is this Microsoft Flight simulator X?
rezn66 3 years ago
Nop
gbone155 3 years ago
Then do you know what it is?
rezn66 3 years ago
fs 2004
MTran0708 3 years ago
It is a twin engine. And whats happened to the wings ?
Farnylancs 3 years ago
Nothing "happened" to them.
gbone155 3 years ago
tommy boy, the 787 only has 2 enginse.the wingspan is like so curvy...
hecker3hecker3 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thats not a dreamliner Dreamliners have the 747 body and 4 engines. Ge your facts straight
tommyboy731 3 years ago
Your wrong
HaydenFSX 3 years ago 6
LOL.. what have you been smoking?..
The 787 Dream Liner is a twin engine (Rolls Royce Trent 1000) mid size airliner smart guy..
The Dream LIFTER which transports parts that make up the Dream Liner is a modified Boeing 747 Cargo Plain.. I suggest next time you get your facts straight idiot.
Sigrafix 3 years ago 2
lol
u just described just that a 747
cjracer1000 3 years ago
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
I really hate to say this BUT.....YOUR STUPID, Google "Dreamliner" then come back (and try not to confuse your small mind with (Dreamliner Livery)
I assume they only let you out at the weekend ?
gbone155 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wrong. Dreamliners have four engines
DisasterDude453 3 years ago
Are you retarded? The 787 will have two Trent 1000's.
12time12 3 years ago 5
actually the customers have a choice of the rolls royce trent 1000s or the General electric ones
ExperimentalPimpuku 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you moms vagina has a dreamliner PWND.
srry but you asked for it.
meRyanP 3 years ago
ure a fuckin dogs knob
Jujurocksallthetime 3 years ago
cause the developer of this plane to fs SUCKS A LOT
ISaitekI 3 years ago
why are the wings so severely bent upwards?
spartydrew5 3 years ago
The way the plane is designed.
It helps create more lift i think
FG11ST12 3 years ago
A U.S. Air Force decision awarding a $35 billion aircraft contract to a team including the European parent of Airbus landed like a bomb in Congress on Friday, drawing howls of protest from lawmakers aligned with the loser, America's Boeing Co.
The Congressional delegation from the Seattle area said they were "outraged." Kansas Republican Rep. Todd Tiahrt vowed to seek a review of the decision "at the highest levels of the Pentagon and Congress" in hopes of reversing it.
BOEING=LOSERS.
arsenium666 3 years ago
Yeah, Grunman and EADS are building up the first new airplane-factory in US since 40 years in the area of Mobile, creating more then 5000 new jobs.
Speaking of Boeing and some politicians in Washington: they do not care about new jobs, higher quality or better airplanes for the U.S. Air Force. It's just about more earnings for Boeing.
Kelevra71 3 years ago
THE 787 DELAY LINER
Boeing keeps repeating the same during the 3 Delay Announcements of the 787 project: "We are just INCOMPETENTS, what more can you expect from us?"
Now 9 MONTHS DELAY!!!