Mark said it best about that caller. The guy leaves a hell hole of a country, comes here and calls our politicians a terrorist. "Open borders...open borders my ass...no open borders!" That's god damn right.
loving this country has nothing to do with Israel. I love Israel too but I want us to get the heck out of the middle east, and I don't care if that comes at the expense of Israel. I just want our troops out of that hell hole known as middle east. Israel can take of it's self it's a powerful nations. Muslims are living in the ice age. Your liberal jewish friends are not anti-israel Mr. Levin. We think you are because NOTHING in your policies are helping her.
If you come to this country, shut up and line up. If they you're Japanese and the government wants to put in concentration camps, the Constitution doesn't apply! Why? According the Levin, you're a "guest", a sub citizen. Can you say HYPOCRISY?
Retard...they weren't concentration camps...read your history....all the food and water they wanted and social activities were allowed. When the was was over we let them free...that simple...it was necessary.
@jdubincali where are you from asshole? I am building a "camp" for people like you...gonna make you listen to other people like you until you see how assanine you are....BTW I don't cry about the indiscretions "my people" incurred upon there legal immigration to this great country. You might find China or Venezuala for compatible start swimming!
Levin complains about 'guests' (who are actually citizens) to the country complaining about the president, and he thinks that's rude behavior for a guest, but what he doesn't realize is it's just as rude for a host to do the same thing. And here he is, a host of a talk radio show, criticizing his guests. This is an example of how conservatives don't make any sense.
what doesnt make any sense is for a person to leave an oppressive society to be fortunate enough to come into a freedom loving country ONLY to want to change it into the oppressive society they just left!
Your comment doesn't make sense. Do you know what the definition of a liberal is? Here's a couple: "Having political or social views favoring reform and progress." "Tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition." See, liberals FIGHT oppression, whereas conservatives just want things to stay the way they were, no matter how bad things are. After all, the definition of conservative is "resistant to change."
Those are not made-up definitions. I went to Google and typed "define: liberal." I C&P'd the definitions.
And um, you're not supposed to fight for oppression; you're supposed to be fighting against it.... So technically, your "tax system" statement is the only one that makes sense... and even then, it's wrong. What is wrong with our tax system? Where do you expect government money to come from? Maybe we ought to just donate to the government out of the goodness of our hearts, hm?
Our current tax system is: the 16th admendment is in direct opposition to the 10th admendment. Thats whats wrong with it.
secondly: there is no such thing as 'government money' it is our money.
Solution: Fair Tax Plan. A person would only be taxed on goods that is purchased by that individual. (No embedded taxes)You would control your own level of taxation and the government would have to live within its Constitutional bounds.
Sounds great, except... to cover losses that the government would have to recoup by not having income taxes, taxes on goods and imports would have to be much higher, which would lead to a decrease in consumer spending, which would hurt everyone, as demonstrated by this economy. Also, how should businesses be taxed?
And yeah, there is such a thing as government money. It's money that we've paid to the government. Same as if I go to Walmart and buy something. My money is now Walmart money.
not really... the government would have more money collected because everyone buys goods and that would make everyone a taxpayer. There would be no exemptions like we have today.
also, spending would increase because there would no embedded taxes like we have today. there would be no income taxes, there would be no capitol gains tax, there would be no death tax etc... so people would have more money to put into the economy.
Read the Fair Tax book written by Neal Boortz and John Linder.
You can't deny the fact that sales taxes would have to be higher. This would put off younger people who don't currently pay taxes, making them less likely to buy merchandise. And we all know what happens when kids want something but can't afford it: they steal it, and of course that hurts everyone. So what is someone caught with stealing charged with? Tax evasion? And once kids start stealing everything, the sales taxes will increase, and those of us who would never steal will simply buy less.
Sales taxes would be higher. 33% to be exact. BUT, YOU would be in control of what you buy and YOU would be in control of how much tax you pay based on consumption.
Remember, Currently we have a Federal tax system that put most median income families at 31%. Plus you have to pay a sales tax as well.
Under the Fair Tax.. There would be NO Fed tax rate because there would be NO FED income taxes paid.
As far a theft... that will exist under whatever tax system we have.
Of course theft will always exist. I'm saying that it will increase if people who are used to paying ~5-7% sales tax find they are suddenly paying 33%. And that, or course, would be tax evasion. People want the freedom to buy whatever they want without having to worry about the taxes on it. I like how sales tax is a minor deal now. I wouldn't want to have to worry about that every time I went to make a purchase. Sorry.
So now you're just copying what Levin says, in calling me a drone? Nice, very nice.... Don't worry, I can appreciate a good bit of irony.
I fail to see how you republicans aren't drones, to be honest. "Aahh, taxes, nooo!" "Aahh, gay people, nooo!" "Aahh, abortion, nooo!" You people are all the same....
Really? And the liberals think that all republicans are the same. Problem with you're statement is that you'll point to the issues we believe in as curve is to your liking to feel above and beyond the argument. Take out your leftist flow sheet now! And what progress do you speak about? What is so bad in society that we need to reform? Is liberalism the answer to the human problem?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Um... how do you people do any different? You take our rationales and simply say we're drones because our rationales behind common party stances are the same.
After eight years of Bush, there's a lot we need to reform, I'm afraid. We've obviously inherited from him this crap economy, not to mention a pointless war and a huge national debt. Oh yeah, and the fact that millions of people are without health coverage or a job may be considered a problem.... There was that stem cell research ban...
I don't think of you as a drone, I'm sure you're an intelligent person and that you know what you are talking about. I just want to talk common sense. I didn't vote for Bush, which was in '04, because I was 18. It's true we did inherit this shitty economy. This whole bi partisan issue is just a endless tug of war, and the rope is choking us. I, as a repub, hate neo cons. I just want see things that work
...which was only in place because Bush had sentiments against it. There's Gitmo, Bushonomics... the list goes on and on. Not to mention the fact that we need to get other nations, who may have hated us under Bush (not without reason, may I add), to "like" us again, so to speak.
As far as foreign policy goes, it's good to maintain allies within our world, but I really don't want Obama spewing that it's ok that terrorist nations like N.Korea, and Iran, ,can start nuclear energy programs. Obama really needs to not play the naive card, that those nations are going to use that for energy sources.
I understand where you're coming from, what I don't understand is why we should be allowed to have enough nuclear weapons to effectively "blow up" the world several times over, but no other nation should be allowed any nuclear weapons. The less ideal solution is to allow other nations to have a limited supply of nuclear weapons. The better solution would be to forfeit most of ours. We must admit that we aren't the superpower we used to be, and not act like we're "better" than everyone else.
It's hard because nations want to keep them in order to safe guard they're country. But you're right it isn't fair that we talk about stopping Nuclear proliferation yet we have the most.
Nuclear deterrence by mutually assured destruction just brought an error of transient peace on the USA and USSR, causing way too many nukes to be made. An arms race is something we dont need right now
Wrong viaja,,listen to marks radio show for two nights and then check his facts like I did the guy is a modern day Edmund Burke,,The guy is smart and what you call repugnant I call RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION,soon we tea party types are going to show up in Washington D/C ,and deliver the message -Run the country according to it founding documents,imagine how the state-ist will kick and scream as they give back all the money and power,,republican or democrat,,From what is allowed to be left of Detroit
It's show biz! Mark gets paid millions to piss people off and is very good at it. Just wish people would not accept his political rhetoric as facts but many do. They really think his position and demeanor is acceptable. To many conservatives this man is repugnant.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Levin's so called "conservative" philosophy is Bolshevic-Trotsky 'spreading ideology with a gun' at any cost. This is what Leo Strauss passed to Krystal and the modern neo-cons like Levin.
The Soviets went broke with this ideology, the USA will go broke with the same.
Levin is a traitor to the United States of America for rejecting folks like Army Sec. Tom White, who drew a plan to get in and out of Iraq within 6 months with .4-.5 million troops.
Just for clarity - everyone needs to go look up Bolshevik-Trotsky Ideology and compare it with deep conservative ideas. People need to start getting answers for themselves and stop listening to the kool aid drinkers - Democrats (National Socialist Party) and Republicans alike. Change of subject - vote them all out, we need a genuine conservative revolution - do we want to be France, Spain, Sweden, worse?
this "interview" if you can call it that is a complete joke, here you have an individual that is to the right of Joseph Goebbels, saying all kinds of despicable things, yet the old man can't make him even one just one direct question of value....where, how do you do the show???, do you transmit to LA? how did you meet your wife?...GIVE A #%^&&@ brake. CSPAN has lost all my respect.
This guy may be brash but boy he hits the nail on the head every freakin' time.
stockinettestitch 5 months ago
I like how his son plays World of Warcraft, priceless
agreatflood2121 1 year ago
toward the end, Mark talks about the anti-semitic element in within the Obama circle and irrelevent Jesse Jackson. Fecalheads.
Check out black conservatives like Allen West running for congress in Florida
and MIchael Faulkner running to replace Charlie Rangel in NY. BOTH Supporters of Israel.
nativeskygirl 1 year ago
damn skippy! GET OFF THE PHONE YA BIG DOPE!!!!!
nativeskygirl 1 year ago
My Jewish brother from anonther Yenta mother!
Baruch Hashem!
specialone8 1 year ago
Mark said it best about that caller. The guy leaves a hell hole of a country, comes here and calls our politicians a terrorist. "Open borders...open borders my ass...no open borders!" That's god damn right.
marathon1974 1 year ago 2
What is the Democrat party? There's no such thing last time I checked.
badtown88 1 year ago
loving this country has nothing to do with Israel. I love Israel too but I want us to get the heck out of the middle east, and I don't care if that comes at the expense of Israel. I just want our troops out of that hell hole known as middle east. Israel can take of it's self it's a powerful nations. Muslims are living in the ice age. Your liberal jewish friends are not anti-israel Mr. Levin. We think you are because NOTHING in your policies are helping her.
MrDetwaa 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrDetwaa 1 year ago
If you come to this country, shut up and line up. If they you're Japanese and the government wants to put in concentration camps, the Constitution doesn't apply! Why? According the Levin, you're a "guest", a sub citizen. Can you say HYPOCRISY?
jdubincali 2 years ago
Retard...they weren't concentration camps...read your history....all the food and water they wanted and social activities were allowed. When the was was over we let them free...that simple...it was necessary.
cchanderson 1 year ago
@jdubincali where are you from asshole? I am building a "camp" for people like you...gonna make you listen to other people like you until you see how assanine you are....BTW I don't cry about the indiscretions "my people" incurred upon there legal immigration to this great country. You might find China or Venezuala for compatible start swimming!
meanranger 1 year ago
i'm from elkins park!!
jskim1 2 years ago
Levin complains about 'guests' (who are actually citizens) to the country complaining about the president, and he thinks that's rude behavior for a guest, but what he doesn't realize is it's just as rude for a host to do the same thing. And here he is, a host of a talk radio show, criticizing his guests. This is an example of how conservatives don't make any sense.
lifeinhd 2 years ago
what doesnt make any sense is for a person to leave an oppressive society to be fortunate enough to come into a freedom loving country ONLY to want to change it into the oppressive society they just left!
That why Liberals don't make any sense.
n2motocross 2 years ago
Your comment doesn't make sense. Do you know what the definition of a liberal is? Here's a couple: "Having political or social views favoring reform and progress." "Tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition." See, liberals FIGHT oppression, whereas conservatives just want things to stay the way they were, no matter how bad things are. After all, the definition of conservative is "resistant to change."
lifeinhd 2 years ago
Thats the problem with Liberalism..... It changes according to whatever it wants to morph into.
Fast forward 2009.... Where has liberals fought for oppression??
It was the liberals in congress that fought AGAINST going to war to fight AGAINST oppression of the Iraqi people.
Where are the liberals for fighting against oppression from a draconian tax sysytem?
Where are the liberals in fighting for oppression of an over-bearing government?
n2motocross 2 years ago
Those are not made-up definitions. I went to Google and typed "define: liberal." I C&P'd the definitions.
And um, you're not supposed to fight for oppression; you're supposed to be fighting against it.... So technically, your "tax system" statement is the only one that makes sense... and even then, it's wrong. What is wrong with our tax system? Where do you expect government money to come from? Maybe we ought to just donate to the government out of the goodness of our hearts, hm?
lifeinhd 2 years ago
correction: I meant fight against oppression.
Our current tax system is: the 16th admendment is in direct opposition to the 10th admendment. Thats whats wrong with it.
secondly: there is no such thing as 'government money' it is our money.
Solution: Fair Tax Plan. A person would only be taxed on goods that is purchased by that individual. (No embedded taxes)You would control your own level of taxation and the government would have to live within its Constitutional bounds.
n2motocross 2 years ago
Sounds great, except... to cover losses that the government would have to recoup by not having income taxes, taxes on goods and imports would have to be much higher, which would lead to a decrease in consumer spending, which would hurt everyone, as demonstrated by this economy. Also, how should businesses be taxed?
And yeah, there is such a thing as government money. It's money that we've paid to the government. Same as if I go to Walmart and buy something. My money is now Walmart money.
lifeinhd 2 years ago
not really... the government would have more money collected because everyone buys goods and that would make everyone a taxpayer. There would be no exemptions like we have today.
also, spending would increase because there would no embedded taxes like we have today. there would be no income taxes, there would be no capitol gains tax, there would be no death tax etc... so people would have more money to put into the economy.
Read the Fair Tax book written by Neal Boortz and John Linder.
n2motocross 2 years ago
You can't deny the fact that sales taxes would have to be higher. This would put off younger people who don't currently pay taxes, making them less likely to buy merchandise. And we all know what happens when kids want something but can't afford it: they steal it, and of course that hurts everyone. So what is someone caught with stealing charged with? Tax evasion? And once kids start stealing everything, the sales taxes will increase, and those of us who would never steal will simply buy less.
lifeinhd 2 years ago
Sales taxes would be higher. 33% to be exact. BUT, YOU would be in control of what you buy and YOU would be in control of how much tax you pay based on consumption.
Remember, Currently we have a Federal tax system that put most median income families at 31%. Plus you have to pay a sales tax as well.
Under the Fair Tax.. There would be NO Fed tax rate because there would be NO FED income taxes paid.
As far a theft... that will exist under whatever tax system we have.
n2motocross 2 years ago
Of course theft will always exist. I'm saying that it will increase if people who are used to paying ~5-7% sales tax find they are suddenly paying 33%. And that, or course, would be tax evasion. People want the freedom to buy whatever they want without having to worry about the taxes on it. I like how sales tax is a minor deal now. I wouldn't want to have to worry about that every time I went to make a purchase. Sorry.
lifeinhd 2 years ago
Nice try
nixonplumber 2 years ago
Sir, you sound like a parrot. Drones, lol.
Tacotruck1166 2 years ago
So now you're just copying what Levin says, in calling me a drone? Nice, very nice.... Don't worry, I can appreciate a good bit of irony.
I fail to see how you republicans aren't drones, to be honest. "Aahh, taxes, nooo!" "Aahh, gay people, nooo!" "Aahh, abortion, nooo!" You people are all the same....
lifeinhd 2 years ago
Really? And the liberals think that all republicans are the same. Problem with you're statement is that you'll point to the issues we believe in as curve is to your liking to feel above and beyond the argument. Take out your leftist flow sheet now! And what progress do you speak about? What is so bad in society that we need to reform? Is liberalism the answer to the human problem?
icemilitia 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Um... how do you people do any different? You take our rationales and simply say we're drones because our rationales behind common party stances are the same.
After eight years of Bush, there's a lot we need to reform, I'm afraid. We've obviously inherited from him this crap economy, not to mention a pointless war and a huge national debt. Oh yeah, and the fact that millions of people are without health coverage or a job may be considered a problem.... There was that stem cell research ban...
lifeinhd 2 years ago
I don't think of you as a drone, I'm sure you're an intelligent person and that you know what you are talking about. I just want to talk common sense. I didn't vote for Bush, which was in '04, because I was 18. It's true we did inherit this shitty economy. This whole bi partisan issue is just a endless tug of war, and the rope is choking us. I, as a repub, hate neo cons. I just want see things that work
icemilitia 2 years ago
...which was only in place because Bush had sentiments against it. There's Gitmo, Bushonomics... the list goes on and on. Not to mention the fact that we need to get other nations, who may have hated us under Bush (not without reason, may I add), to "like" us again, so to speak.
lifeinhd 2 years ago
As far as foreign policy goes, it's good to maintain allies within our world, but I really don't want Obama spewing that it's ok that terrorist nations like N.Korea, and Iran, ,can start nuclear energy programs. Obama really needs to not play the naive card, that those nations are going to use that for energy sources.
icemilitia 2 years ago
I understand where you're coming from, what I don't understand is why we should be allowed to have enough nuclear weapons to effectively "blow up" the world several times over, but no other nation should be allowed any nuclear weapons. The less ideal solution is to allow other nations to have a limited supply of nuclear weapons. The better solution would be to forfeit most of ours. We must admit that we aren't the superpower we used to be, and not act like we're "better" than everyone else.
lifeinhd 2 years ago
It's hard because nations want to keep them in order to safe guard they're country. But you're right it isn't fair that we talk about stopping Nuclear proliferation yet we have the most.
icemilitia 2 years ago
Nuclear deterrence by mutually assured destruction just brought an error of transient peace on the USA and USSR, causing way too many nukes to be made. An arms race is something we dont need right now
icemilitia 2 years ago
So what your saying is were christian
alexisonfiredb 2 years ago
Huh??? When did I say that? Besides, I'm not Christian... so I'm not quite sure how you arrived at that conclusion....
lifeinhd 2 years ago
Wrong viaja,,listen to marks radio show for two nights and then check his facts like I did the guy is a modern day Edmund Burke,,The guy is smart and what you call repugnant I call RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION,soon we tea party types are going to show up in Washington D/C ,and deliver the message -Run the country according to it founding documents,imagine how the state-ist will kick and scream as they give back all the money and power,,republican or democrat,,From what is allowed to be left of Detroit
savychris 2 years ago
It's show biz! Mark gets paid millions to piss people off and is very good at it. Just wish people would not accept his political rhetoric as facts but many do. They really think his position and demeanor is acceptable. To many conservatives this man is repugnant.
Viajador1 2 years ago
bullshit they might call themselves conservatives they man stands for classic conservativism
jbBuckn 2 years ago
Levin is great! Hey libs, you post like he cares what you think. haha
jmspflw 2 years ago
'intelligent callers' ... there aren't any who listen to you Mark !
Misunderstood246 2 years ago
Do you really think he hops on here and reads posts you fucking moron?
mec554 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hey Levin, your son's a loser.
Questfortruth86 2 years ago
LOVE the great one!!
Gunndog3161 2 years ago 2
"Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society."
Aristotle
3rdworldinvasion2 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Levin's so called "conservative" philosophy is Bolshevic-Trotsky 'spreading ideology with a gun' at any cost. This is what Leo Strauss passed to Krystal and the modern neo-cons like Levin.
The Soviets went broke with this ideology, the USA will go broke with the same.
Levin is a traitor to the United States of America for rejecting folks like Army Sec. Tom White, who drew a plan to get in and out of Iraq within 6 months with .4-.5 million troops.
Mark should be charged with treason.
cattleprods911 2 years ago
copy and paste wanker Commie virgin
drsnk1 2 years ago 4
Just for clarity - everyone needs to go look up Bolshevik-Trotsky Ideology and compare it with deep conservative ideas. People need to start getting answers for themselves and stop listening to the kool aid drinkers - Democrats (National Socialist Party) and Republicans alike. Change of subject - vote them all out, we need a genuine conservative revolution - do we want to be France, Spain, Sweden, worse?
therandman1 2 years ago
The Great One
jec1521 3 years ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
this "interview" if you can call it that is a complete joke, here you have an individual that is to the right of Joseph Goebbels, saying all kinds of despicable things, yet the old man can't make him even one just one direct question of value....where, how do you do the show???, do you transmit to LA? how did you meet your wife?...GIVE A #%^&&@ brake. CSPAN has lost all my respect.
farsittini 3 years ago
This is a REAL interview.....Not a stalinist show trial on Commie News Network.....If thats what you want watch MSLSD or CNN....
Johnny4787 3 years ago 30
Commie wanker
drsnk1 2 years ago