one thing i dont understand. how does the building start to collapse from the bottom when the plane hit way up high? and the part where the plane hit isnt tipping over or anything so how does the building start falling from the bottom?
Wow I used to think you that if you didn't question everything you were a leming. I believed that until I started hearing these 9/11 conspiracies. If anyone could possibly think that the government was so cunning that they could sneak into one of the largest and busiest buildings on the planet and plant explosives very carefully without anyone detecting this. Murder thousands of Americans just so they would have a reason to go to war then I just feel sorry for them.
Well i feel sorry for you for denying all this evidence just because it was "hard to do". Nanothermite found in dust(and iron-rich spheres),pools of molten metal on all 3 sites, 1100 victims never found(no piece large enough to find for dna sample)!! 60% of 9/11 commisioners had conflicts of intrest and some of them said it was set up to fail. Workers from WTC claimed weird activities prior 9/11(such like large bangs and alot of dust in work places). And there alot more, im out of letters.
Why didn't all of that structure below the impact zone hold what was above the impact zone? What was above may be heavy but below obviously must be about 7 times heavier at least. Why couldn't that support that part of the building?
The planes may of damaged some of the structure but not so much of the core columns tho. The core columns are the main support structures what happened to them where did they go to in 10-13 seconds when the buildings came down?
George bush and the government are just like Hitler and the Nazis. Blaming everything on an easy target (the Muslims). Just like what Hitler did with the Jews. The American government can't hide the truth much longer.
if there were charges planted, causing that "blast wave" why can't they be picked up in any audio recordings? because thermite was used? that wouldn't cause the bulge(blastwave?) any more than the support columns failing in a collapse... what exactly is this video showing?
thermite isnt explosive, it gets hot enough to melt steel though. and if there werent any bombs planted in the building, the top part that started falling would have just fell over. when it starts tilting, it doesnt just make the rest of the building fall perfectly straight down.
well what i see is the building leaning toward the impact area, then it starts collapsing when theres nothing left to support it. pushing away the building as it falls. high rise buildings like this would not just tip over like that. each floor isn't designed to support everything ontop of it, the central columns are doing that. once they are severed, the building will go down like this.
well i read that a steel framed building can still stand with 2/3 of its columns broken. and what about WTC tower 7? those are the first and only steel framed buildings to collapse from a fire.
well they all suffered severe structural damage. so they didn't fall solely because of fire. That 2/3rds thing is relative, it will vary building to building, city to city, depends mostly on the building codes, and if the building legitimately passed inspection.
@wiez5 : They still came down without resistance which is physically impossible on it own. That building was steel framed withe 47 inner steal colums,
Hopefully you can spread the word and get the truth out there.
Because if not the world is absolutely doomed we are on our way to destruction very very soon and if we dont act fast we might not be able to act at all.
Any structural engineer could tell you that the impact damaged the structural collums. You have about 3 times as much weight on this tower at the point of impact. This heavy weight is what caused this tower to collapse first. As the metal softened from the intense heat created by the jet fuel the weight caused the sturctural support collumn to fail. on the first tower hit it took the collumn to actually melt. You can find fottage of the molten metal falling from that building.
which plnet you live in? May you failed miserably on your physics studies. Structural engineers are asking for 9/11 truth. Check their video analysis of the noerth tower collapse/demilition.
Steel does not melt that easy, unless you use nanothermite.
Molten metal jet fuel can't produce in this amount of time, especially from a jet fuel or kerosene based office fire. Also, the molten metal can't be aluminum b/c molten aluminum looks exactly like solid aluminum.
wow you sound exactly like george bush. scientists found a lot of thermite in the rubble, along with molten steel. you know what thermite is? it burns up to 4500 dergrees fahrenheit. jet fuel burns up to 550 degrees fahrenheit. steel melts around 2500 degrees. and ANY structural engineer could tell you that no steel frame building has EVER collapsed from a fire, until 9/11. george bush is the real terrorist.
well its just too coincidental. other steel framed buildings have burned from explosions for up to 13 hours, until the fire was put out and they STILL didnt collapse. these buildings collapsed after what 1 hour? and another building fell that didnt even get hit.
The official story says it was because it was hit lower. I thought about this, looked at the official damage repports (mainly FEMAs), and came to the conclusion that it might have been hit lower - but that doesn't make fire burn quicker or hotter. So You are absolutely right - HOW?!
This has been flagged as spam show
one thing i dont understand. how does the building start to collapse from the bottom when the plane hit way up high? and the part where the plane hit isnt tipping over or anything so how does the building start falling from the bottom?
cardude1992 9 months ago
Yawn. Rip.
djsuploaded 11 months ago
Wow I used to think you that if you didn't question everything you were a leming. I believed that until I started hearing these 9/11 conspiracies. If anyone could possibly think that the government was so cunning that they could sneak into one of the largest and busiest buildings on the planet and plant explosives very carefully without anyone detecting this. Murder thousands of Americans just so they would have a reason to go to war then I just feel sorry for them.
jay26mc 1 year ago
Well i feel sorry for you for denying all this evidence just because it was "hard to do". Nanothermite found in dust(and iron-rich spheres),pools of molten metal on all 3 sites, 1100 victims never found(no piece large enough to find for dna sample)!! 60% of 9/11 commisioners had conflicts of intrest and some of them said it was set up to fail. Workers from WTC claimed weird activities prior 9/11(such like large bangs and alot of dust in work places). And there alot more, im out of letters.
Matu1 1 year ago
Why didn't all of that structure below the impact zone hold what was above the impact zone? What was above may be heavy but below obviously must be about 7 times heavier at least. Why couldn't that support that part of the building?
The planes may of damaged some of the structure but not so much of the core columns tho. The core columns are the main support structures what happened to them where did they go to in 10-13 seconds when the buildings came down?
100pjp001 1 year ago
George bush and the government are just like Hitler and the Nazis. Blaming everything on an easy target (the Muslims). Just like what Hitler did with the Jews. The American government can't hide the truth much longer.
MegaMetaljoe 1 year ago 2
& these truthers call the birthers nutty?The nerve
VANITYBONET 2 years ago
Hey i saw that white flash on right side back of bld just before tilt...
michaeledith 2 years ago
if there were charges planted, causing that "blast wave" why can't they be picked up in any audio recordings? because thermite was used? that wouldn't cause the bulge(blastwave?) any more than the support columns failing in a collapse... what exactly is this video showing?
wiez5 2 years ago
thermite isnt explosive, it gets hot enough to melt steel though. and if there werent any bombs planted in the building, the top part that started falling would have just fell over. when it starts tilting, it doesnt just make the rest of the building fall perfectly straight down.
GodlyVayne 2 years ago
well what i see is the building leaning toward the impact area, then it starts collapsing when theres nothing left to support it. pushing away the building as it falls. high rise buildings like this would not just tip over like that. each floor isn't designed to support everything ontop of it, the central columns are doing that. once they are severed, the building will go down like this.
wiez5 2 years ago
well i read that a steel framed building can still stand with 2/3 of its columns broken. and what about WTC tower 7? those are the first and only steel framed buildings to collapse from a fire.
GodlyVayne 2 years ago
well they all suffered severe structural damage. so they didn't fall solely because of fire. That 2/3rds thing is relative, it will vary building to building, city to city, depends mostly on the building codes, and if the building legitimately passed inspection.
wiez5 2 years ago
yeah thats true. i still believe there were explosives in it though. even if the US had anything to do with it or not.
GodlyVayne 2 years ago
@wiez5 : They still came down without resistance which is physically impossible on it own. That building was steel framed withe 47 inner steal colums,
omidahomi 1 year ago
look at the building at 0:49
it turned kinda left at the top where the plane didnt
hit
jusspoiss6 3 years ago
...the plane didn't hit there..it's ture...but it blowed there..when the plane crash into the building...it didn't blowed up to that side...
660alex660 3 years ago
speak english dude ..
LockyDaFijiG 3 years ago
people
watch the video
Top Secret OF Mankind
It will answer any questions you have
About anything.
Hopefully you can spread the word and get the truth out there.
Because if not the world is absolutely doomed we are on our way to destruction very very soon and if we dont act fast we might not be able to act at all.
KevinHuguet 3 years ago
Any structural engineer could tell you that the impact damaged the structural collums. You have about 3 times as much weight on this tower at the point of impact. This heavy weight is what caused this tower to collapse first. As the metal softened from the intense heat created by the jet fuel the weight caused the sturctural support collumn to fail. on the first tower hit it took the collumn to actually melt. You can find fottage of the molten metal falling from that building.
waltv79 3 years ago
It's a misconception that the jet-fuel burned any longer than MAX.(!) 10 minutes. Also acc. to the official 'theory'....
clauzii 3 years ago
@clauzii
which plnet you live in? May you failed miserably on your physics studies. Structural engineers are asking for 9/11 truth. Check their video analysis of the noerth tower collapse/demilition.
Steel does not melt that easy, unless you use nanothermite.
sacopenapa 1 year ago 2
@clauzii
That is beautiful, how to you explain the collapse of WTC7???
sacopenapa 1 year ago
Molten metal jet fuel can't produce in this amount of time, especially from a jet fuel or kerosene based office fire. Also, the molten metal can't be aluminum b/c molten aluminum looks exactly like solid aluminum.
Airportchris2 2 years ago
wow you sound exactly like george bush. scientists found a lot of thermite in the rubble, along with molten steel. you know what thermite is? it burns up to 4500 dergrees fahrenheit. jet fuel burns up to 550 degrees fahrenheit. steel melts around 2500 degrees. and ANY structural engineer could tell you that no steel frame building has EVER collapsed from a fire, until 9/11. george bush is the real terrorist.
GodlyVayne 2 years ago 6
@GodlyVayne ummm actually steven jones admiots that they found ummm "no thermite" in th erubble. Read his paper sometime.
guitarspeare 2 years ago
well its just too coincidental. other steel framed buildings have burned from explosions for up to 13 hours, until the fire was put out and they STILL didnt collapse. these buildings collapsed after what 1 hour? and another building fell that didnt even get hit.
GodlyVayne 2 years ago
@waltv79 Where did you copy & paste that from?
BizarreMike666 1 year ago
@waltv79 "You can find fottage of the molten metal falling from that building. "
There is no way any oxygen/Kerosine fire could've caused that,
TheSupr3m3 1 year ago
@waltv79 hahahaha,,,,,,,r u fucked in the head????,,,,,,,,you are so completely and totally brainwashed if you believe that load of shit!!!
bigbopper993 7 months ago
The official story says it was because it was hit lower. I thought about this, looked at the official damage repports (mainly FEMAs), and came to the conclusion that it might have been hit lower - but that doesn't make fire burn quicker or hotter. So You are absolutely right - HOW?!
clauzii 3 years ago
@clauzii Notice the air squibs due to the air trying to escape out ward, the cores stood longer so no demolition was possible.
Ya all need a pill to calm down the RAGE and Hate Towards the Great G.W.B.
SkuIICrusherGhost 7 months ago
how did that tower fall if it got hit 2nd, the other building was burning longer
b198lky 3 years ago
would 1/3 of the tower collapse?
justwatch000 3 years ago
It got hit lower, so as the supports failed, the remaining supports had WAY more weight put on them than the other tower that got hit first.
UponInfinity 2 years ago