Well, let us assume what he said is true. If that is the case what particular disability do you think he will be lumbered with in his next life for committing the sin of adultery in this life?
Whats that guy on about if your unemployed you get £50 if yourt disabled you get £100. Thats because the unemployed people get get off the arse's and support themselves with work whereas disabled people can't. What a dumbass
See...I offer up a genuine response and all you can do is spout inane drivel. The next time you try to engage in a serious bit of convo squire at least leave your fragile ego and naff attempt at satire behind.
You are beaten and you know it. You believe in b*llshit that someone made up a long long time ago because you are a sheep who follows the other sheep and can't have an original thought.
Hoddle's views are no more insane than most of the basis of the world's religions which believe in stuff that cannot be proved and is passed down through generations as a truth. The basis of most religions is no more credible than Santa Claus.
As a kid if you ask your parents who is God (cos to even a kid it sounds bollocks), because they dont know they just lie in order to make you believe the guff. You can even get a guy to blow himself up because he will get 7 virgins in heaven. Duh.
Good point, its always been that way with religon. Some peoples beliefs are sneared at more than others, some have more controversial beliefs. But i reckon in Hoddle's case he was in the wrong place at the wrong time to be comin out with stuff like that. a little bit of self awareness wouldn't have gone amiss...
Yes there is mate. For a theory to stand up it has to have evidence.Science can back the theory of creation by that evidence.Science cannot prove evolution.
The vast majority of Nobel prize winning scientists subscribe to the theory of creation and until they can prove otherwise I sit on the side of creation.
Im not your mate I dont even know you. I dont do fake.
Sit where you like with your men in white coats around you. No one knows for sure so do what you like. Just dont try and impose it on anyone else. Typical of your ilk you are already talking about 'sides' sums up my point nicely about religion.
You remarked that "Hoddle's views are no more insane than most of the basis of the world's religions.The basis of most religions is no more credible than Santa Claus."
That that would put you on the side of aethiest then yes? I think that settles your choosing "sides" argument.
So with regards to religion having no more basis than santa clause is that Professor Stephen Hawking and Noble prize winning scientists such as Arno Penzias are wrong and you are correct then yes?
Im not an aethieist. see you guys have to pigeon hole everyone dont you. everyone must take a side.
I actually had sex with eve to create the human race. you cant disprove it. you can either choose to believe me or not. its up to you. maybe if i wrote it down and spilled some tea on it, would that help. serialisation in The Times, a few prizes, would that help. say a few other people started to believe would that help, few thousand? how about a few million,over many years.its gotta be fact.
See...I offer up a genuine response and all you can do is spout inane drivel. The next time you try to engage in a serious bit of convo squire at least leave your fragile ego and naff attempt at satire behind.
The guys comment: "he (Hoddle) picked 22 of them to take to the World Cup" is outragous!! (0.42 seconds). I'm English but I couldn't care less if he wants to slag off the England football team. He can do it all he likes. But to align bad performance with disability is dreadful. He implies that if there's a group of people u don't like, or who are below standard in something, then call them 'disabled' cos its a byword for all ills, and all things negative, in the world. This guy is an arsehole!
..continued.. I know someone who is disabled and that person would be upset by his guy's cheapening of the term in order to make it fit with any situation of failure, something to be mocked, laughed at, belittled, etc. What he said will be very offensive to disabled people. Ironically it features in a talk on the subject of whether someone else's comments on disability are acceptable! Ironic indeed!
FECK David Mellor.. Thats a blinding man to quote.. TWO FACED BASTARD!!! As for asking aload of jocks???? yeh your really get a unbias view!!! Its like asking Salman Rushdie is a nice bloke to a Muslim... crock of shite!!
Hoddle is a fucking idiot.
BigDuke6ixx 2 months ago
clearly going to be biased as they asked the scottish.
Franksy8 5 months ago
0.49 glenn hoddle walked over that guys grave
MrHopeTelevision 6 months ago
i guess that "HAHAHA" at 0:49 is a symptom of his disability, bless
youreflectme 7 months ago
thick scottish accent there haha
11caulfield 1 year ago
Aren't sweaty socks all a bunch of sweaty cripples ?
vikingraider1 1 year ago
@vikingraider1 haha
zacharyj1234 1 year ago
HAHAHA
JamboMikey 1 year ago
this looks like such a shit video, why is it scottish, what the fuck do they know?
rjohnso01 2 years ago
Well, let us assume what he said is true. If that is the case what particular disability do you think he will be lumbered with in his next life for committing the sin of adultery in this life?
abelseeman 2 years ago
It was a disgrace, and he deserves to be run over.
TimmahUK 2 years ago
He only said what was true. Cripples should just accept it
thoricfern 3 years ago
Whats that guy on about if your unemployed you get £50 if yourt disabled you get £100. Thats because the unemployed people get get off the arse's and support themselves with work whereas disabled people can't. What a dumbass
arunlfc1 3 years ago 2
LOL....As usual the retard gets beaten and resorts to what he knows best. A string of highly original and well thought out insults.
You have beaten yourself and tied yourself in knots throughout. Your dumb sentiments reflect
your lack of knowledge and confusion. So you have beaten science then?...
You really are deluded and thick...
coleywantsausername 3 years ago
Next!!!
coleywantsausername 3 years ago
See...I offer up a genuine response and all you can do is spout inane drivel. The next time you try to engage in a serious bit of convo squire at least leave your fragile ego and naff attempt at satire behind.
coleywantsausername 3 years ago
You are beaten and you know it. You believe in b*llshit that someone made up a long long time ago because you are a sheep who follows the other sheep and can't have an original thought.
Squire? Mate? f*ck off you stupid c*nt
innit27 3 years ago
Glenn Hoddle should never of been sacked , he speaks words of wisdom , and the thoughts he shared should of been celebrated , not hated.
RWL500 3 years ago
notice all the ppl are scotish, commenting on an England manager
ha! wankers!
DeadlyLedley26 3 years ago
Hoddle's views are no more insane than most of the basis of the world's religions which believe in stuff that cannot be proved and is passed down through generations as a truth. The basis of most religions is no more credible than Santa Claus.
As a kid if you ask your parents who is God (cos to even a kid it sounds bollocks), because they dont know they just lie in order to make you believe the guff. You can even get a guy to blow himself up because he will get 7 virgins in heaven. Duh.
innit27 3 years ago 3
Good point, its always been that way with religon. Some peoples beliefs are sneared at more than others, some have more controversial beliefs. But i reckon in Hoddle's case he was in the wrong place at the wrong time to be comin out with stuff like that. a little bit of self awareness wouldn't have gone amiss...
LionelGlitchie 3 years ago
He should never have said it to a journalist, they can't be trusted and most of them will be coming back with a disability in the next life.
innit27 3 years ago
wheres the video of hoddle saying these comments?
mikecarlberg 3 years ago
There is Scientific evidence to prove the theory of creation. Science cannot back Darwins theory.
That is a fact.
coleywantsausername 3 years ago
There is no theory to support how you were shat into creation thats for sure.
Oh I forgot when someone writes 'that is fact' after something then is must surely be true.
innit27 3 years ago
Yes there is mate. For a theory to stand up it has to have evidence.Science can back the theory of creation by that evidence.Science cannot prove evolution.
The vast majority of Nobel prize winning scientists subscribe to the theory of creation and until they can prove otherwise I sit on the side of creation.
coleywantsausername 3 years ago
Im not your mate I dont even know you. I dont do fake.
Sit where you like with your men in white coats around you. No one knows for sure so do what you like. Just dont try and impose it on anyone else. Typical of your ilk you are already talking about 'sides' sums up my point nicely about religion.
innit27 3 years ago
I stand up for what I believe in. So if you are going to impose your athiest/agnostic fundamentalist views then I will exercise the right of reply.
PS...Not all scientists wear white coats ;-)
coleywantsausername 3 years ago
PPS...What point was that exactly???
coleywantsausername 3 years ago
standing up now are ya, you were sitting on a side last time. make up you mind. stand up sit down.
the white coats i was referring were actually the guards at the funny farm
allah akbar
innit27 3 years ago
You remarked that "Hoddle's views are no more insane than most of the basis of the world's religions.The basis of most religions is no more credible than Santa Claus."
That that would put you on the side of aethiest then yes? I think that settles your choosing "sides" argument.
So with regards to religion having no more basis than santa clause is that Professor Stephen Hawking and Noble prize winning scientists such as Arno Penzias are wrong and you are correct then yes?
coleywantsausername 3 years ago
Im not an aethieist. see you guys have to pigeon hole everyone dont you. everyone must take a side.
I actually had sex with eve to create the human race. you cant disprove it. you can either choose to believe me or not. its up to you. maybe if i wrote it down and spilled some tea on it, would that help. serialisation in The Times, a few prizes, would that help. say a few other people started to believe would that help, few thousand? how about a few million,over many years.its gotta be fact.
innit27 3 years ago
See...I offer up a genuine response and all you can do is spout inane drivel. The next time you try to engage in a serious bit of convo squire at least leave your fragile ego and naff attempt at satire behind.
coleywantsausername 3 years ago
"You guys pigeon hole"...what guys?...oh us guys "THIS SIDE".
You are "opposing" a point of view. Which means you are oppostite. Therefore there are "sides" as you call it.
coleywantsausername 3 years ago
Im just stringing you along you pr*ck and you dont even know it. ahahaha
innit27 3 years ago
The guys comment: "he (Hoddle) picked 22 of them to take to the World Cup" is outragous!! (0.42 seconds). I'm English but I couldn't care less if he wants to slag off the England football team. He can do it all he likes. But to align bad performance with disability is dreadful. He implies that if there's a group of people u don't like, or who are below standard in something, then call them 'disabled' cos its a byword for all ills, and all things negative, in the world. This guy is an arsehole!
SenatorMcDonald 4 years ago
..continued.. I know someone who is disabled and that person would be upset by his guy's cheapening of the term in order to make it fit with any situation of failure, something to be mocked, laughed at, belittled, etc. What he said will be very offensive to disabled people. Ironically it features in a talk on the subject of whether someone else's comments on disability are acceptable! Ironic indeed!
SenatorMcDonald 4 years ago
Very bad comment. Offensive to disabled people!
SenatorMcDonald 4 years ago
Kenneth looks like a cool kind of guy.
psyk149 4 years ago
FECK David Mellor.. Thats a blinding man to quote.. TWO FACED BASTARD!!! As for asking aload of jocks???? yeh your really get a unbias view!!! Its like asking Salman Rushdie is a nice bloke to a Muslim... crock of shite!!
UNCLESWHOLLOP 4 years ago