Added: 1 year ago
From: thegenesiscode
Views: 48,539
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (88)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • cause and effect people, cause and effect

  • The foundation of science is an open mind......hey that's the same thing required for faith. Isn't that strange? Wouldn't it be amazing if science and religion came together and we discovered that both were right? I think it's weird that people who are scientifically minded can't or won't consider the possilbities that faith (not religion) inspires?

  • @emilyandros The foundation of scientific theories is evidence. The foundation of faith is independent on whether evidence exists or not. Science is about figuring out which of possible answers is true, and what you propose has already happened, in a way. And everyday scientists try to disprove their own theories.

  • Evolutionists are so funny. lol I love the way they think they apply scientic method. lol Oh, I needed a laugh today. Thanks.

  • When science doesn't have an answer, a hypothesis or theory is formulated.  Belief in a hypothesis or theory requires a leap of faith. When one dogmatically upholds one belief system versus another, it becomes one's religion in essence. The evolution debate has never been between science and dogma. The debate is between dogma and dogma. The theory of evolution is just that...a theory; not scientific fact. It takes faith to believe anything that cannot be proven by the available evidence.

  • @revdrtom When science doesn't have an answer, an educated guess (aka hypothesis) is formulated. Then it's tested. If it stands up to scrutiny and hasn't been disproven, it officially becomes an official explanation of the facts (aka theory). If it fails to stand up from the scrutiny, it is either discarded to philosophy, or revised in some way. Relativity, Gravity, Evolution, Atomic, etc. are some examples of surviving theories.

  • Comment removed

  • @bill4long COULDNT BE MORE WRONG THAN WRONG,,, MOSES WROTE THIS,, EVEN JESUS TESTIFIED TO THIS FACT, I TRUST JESUS TESTIMONY,

  • I hate how they can't seem to tell the difference between Science and the theory of Evolution... It isn't Evolution that conflicts with Religion, it's religion that makes that decision. (sometimes) But Science and Religion cannot agree in some things because Religion simply lacks the scientific method to draw their conclusions. Take, Creationism for example.

  • I don't know if God exists, but the fact that Catherine Hicks keeps getting acting jobs is definitive proof that Satan is real.

  • If this movie makes Ray Comforts head explode it will be worth it

  • Yes, I completely agree. I'm just saying there's no need to argue about it. Science doesn't need anyone's help or defense. It's laws are true - final! No need to debate. If one knows the concept of gravity, they should just move on and not need to argue it out. Both sides believe they are correct - obviously they aren't going to agree and the religious people will continue disallowing rational discord on the matter.

  • Why does this exist?

  • HOW IS THIS A THING HOW IS THIS A THING HOW IS THIS A THING

  • Why is there even a debate for Faith vs. Science? Seriously people it is not that hard. It's like arguing whether a square is round or not.

    Faith = believe without justifiction = Gullibility

  • Why is everyone arguing? Faith is not something you can physically prove/explain, which is the opposite of science so obviously the veiws on whichever one is correct are going to be completley contrary! To all people who believe creation: you cant prove it so stop trying to explain it cos its by faith! Throwin pearls to swine mate. Dont bother.

  • @pinktissues science says the universe was created by the an explosion called the big bang theory which is still only a theory. if this is true where did the stuff that the universe was created from. it wasnt just there. the only logical explanation is it was placed there.

  • @willmorevids Yes i completley agree, im just saying theres no need to argue about it, God doesnt need anyones help or defence, His word is true - final! No need to debate, if one knows what they have is right, they should just move on and not need to argue it out. Both sides think they're right, obviously they're not gonna agree. The faith side doesn't offer a scientificly logical explanation so its gonna look like the more 'ignorant' side, fact is, many ppls spiritual eyes are blind as bats.

  • @willmorevids You're doing it wrong.

  • "science feared religion" LOL

    right. sure it did.

    Even if scientists (not "science") feared it, it would be the same way that black people feared the KKK.

  • haha. It's so funny to see non-Christians or skeptics riddle this page with arguments. It makes me wonder why they're even checking the movie out. Like it's going to make a difference in a steadfast believer or somehow make the debate of intelligent design versus unbelievable scientific odds just, what? Disappear. Keep it coming guys. It's worth the laugh.

  • @TheHaasa You might be laughing, but for me, I get saddened by how many people there are in this world that arrogantly declare that which they do not even understand as false, just to make way for beliefs that they are used to. Fortunately, as society further modernizes and education becomes available to more people around the world, the ignorance fades, and as people understand science (and not just what they've been told about it in church), they turn to accept it for what it REALLY is.

  • lmao

  • hey its the guy who would have made a better edward than rob pattinson

  • Wow, you guys are really getting desperate now trying to disprove scientists.

    Why don't you use your money for something good like feeding starving nations or helping to cure AIDS than for the budget of this movie?

  • I'm christian, I admit that it's not need to trust on any god, which is only a notion or impression. I think the time of the end is closer, and this movie is a consequence of this conflict. Anyway USA can be very proud that the most important war in the history is being fighting on its territory. God versus philosophical materialism. In God I trust. (I'm not american). Does anybody know when version in Spanish go out to sale?, I suspect it contains a lot of psycology for american mind.

  • you gotta love the earnestness though! Now get your head out of the sand pit you nice people!

  • stop clinging to your dying belief system. Religion cannot mold itself around science. If so, it ceases to be religion. The bible is full of specific people & places and you can't pick and choose certain elements to coincide w/ breakthroughs in science. Reminds me of Christian parents who find out their son/daughter is gay. "oh, well we don't believe that part about homosexuality being an abomination." Of course you don't, it doesn't fit your emergent world. It's all bullshit, every sacred word

  • Why would a God and Christian hater even want to post on this site? If you don't like it, stay on your own godless turf.

  • @MsM1114 why do religious nuts post on Dawkins and Darwin Videos? The same reason we irreligious post here, because we believe we are right and you are wrong. The difference being, we don't have to rely on a two-thousand year old book that features talking snakes to prove it...

  • Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Give a man a religion and he'll starve to death praying for a fish!

  • I think I'll make a movie this weekend too.

  • pathetic script. pathetic bias and pathetic concept.

    keep in mind that most religious people , mostly creationists, think that "the finstones" are a historical account.

  • @olllj How did you get a copy of the script??? Who are "the finestones"???

  • SPOILER ALERT: Science is correct

  • @tomrichugpeltho You're right. That IS what the movie teaches. Science is right. But so can Christianity. That's what this movie's about. They don't have to be enemies, do they?

  • Religious people are fat and stupid.

  • Genesis, eh? Phil Collins has let himself go a bit..

  • "Carrie, we live in the post-modern world."

    Sweet merciful Christmas! "Atlas Shrugged" has more believable dialogue than this.

  • @ShadowPa1adin I'm sure throwing in "post modern" sounded so secular to these English crippled writers! To bad they don't even know what the fuck that means. I hope these guys are just robbing xTians are their hard earned cash. It's hard to believe that film makers could be this artistically and intellectually bankrupt.

  • If there was a God, he would never allow something like this to exist. I feel like stabbing my eyes with rusty forks.

  • I think that we all have the right to an opinion, and this work appears to be well done with a level of professionalism. I applaud anyone who is honest with their own belief system, especially when they are willing to accept criticism from the public in order to be able to express those beliefs. I can not quote better than Shakespeare who stated: "To thine own self be true."

  • Comment removed

  • If there is a God, why is it that these "Christian" movies never have a budget and they never make money. I think God hates Christians...!

  • Why do I suspect that this movie's answer to reconciling Genesis with science will not be the rather obvious conclusion that Genesis does not contain scientific information?

  • what a load of bollocks...oh and the movie sucks...as good an idea as "Battlefield Earth"

  • the best defense for fiction is more fiction

  • @KevinBjorke : Fiction: a. An imaginative creation or a pretense that does not represent actuality but has been invented. (source: "the free dictionary"). The Bible says: So God created man in his own image...and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, Genesis 1: 27 , 28. ¿can you show me any other species in the universe capable to make this?, ¿ can you avoid the Earth planet be full by humanity?.

  • @Leivinn20 so far only humans have made movies, ¡good point!

  • @KevinBjorke : Thanks, "fact" means fact. Bible fits to fact. Creationists call this «anthropocentric principle» because it's universal.

  • except the verses that say the world does not move.

    - and the ones about dragons

    - and some others. . .

  • kraptasic 

  • only in america............

  • When does this movie come out?!!!!!!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • It is called Entropy. Look it up. Things don't just fall together or get better on their own.

    It is a SCIENTIFIC term.

  • @1God3manifestations Earth is not in a state of entropy. We receive vast amounts of energy from the sun.

  • @andyjunction

    Well, while it is true that the Earth receives vast amounts of energy from the Sun that doesn't change the law of ENTROPY.

    (while I don't like wikipedia it is a quick reference that is following) :

    **** The concept of entropy is defined by the second law of thermodynamics, which states that the entropy of a closed system always increases or remains constant. Thus, entropy is also

  • @1 andyjunction

    cont. -- Thus, entropy is also measure of the tendency of a process, such as a chemical reaction, to be entropically favored, or to proceed in a particular direction. It determines that thermal energy always flows spontaneously from regions of higher temperature to regions of lower temperature, in the form of heat. These processes reduce the state of order of the initial systems, and therefore entropy is an expression of disorder or randomness.

  • @1God3manifestations - Earth is in a state of decreasing entropy, so entropy is not an issue for life on Earth.

  • @1God3manifestations Entropy exists in closed systems. Since the earth receives outside energy from the sun it is not a closed system.

  • @1God3manifestations - Earth is in a state of decreasing entropy, so entropy is not an issue for life on Earth.

  • Comment removed

  • @andyjunction Honey.. the WHOLE FREAKING UNIVERSE is a CLOSED system... the Earth is just a tiny part.

    Things FALL apart on the EARTH really fast.

  • Oh. btw ..Darwin rejected evolutionary THEORY as false late in his life.

    He came up with it when the ONLY things visible under the most powerful microscope were a single cell. We now see inside a single cell creature- all the organellies (spell) & down to now the little thingys zipping around the nuclei of an atom & even further. HOUSE of Cards ...NEVER falls together from 52 pickup no matter how many times it is tried. The Gypsy Moth experiments NEVER "created" something new or better.

  • @1God3manifestations: "Darwin rejected evolutionary THEORY as false late in his life."

    Well, he didn't, actually, but even if he had, it would make no difference; evolution isn't true because Darwin said it was, it's true because it's true, as 150 years of research has demonstrated.

    I assume your comment about cells is implying complexity; yes, evolution created complex cells. Why shouldn't it have done so?

    "Gypsy Moth experiments"? The ones from the 1930's? Who cares?

  • to Aljeron 100 :

    REAL Science doesn't conflict with Faith. LOST was NOT a Christian show that is why you liked it. I watched Lost it was not .. I repeat NOT.. a Christian show. It had more new age crap in it than anything else. YOU seem to not get real Christian messages or not accept them. I haven't seen enough of this film "the Genesis Code" to know what it "preaches" so I can't really say if this is truly a Christian film. I was just addressing your remarks, Aljeron 100.

  • @1God3manifestations His main point was that this movie is too obviously pushing an agenda. When films do that, they get rejected. And rightly so, because nobody wants to pay to get preached at. He's just saying it should have been done in such a manner that the story takes precedence, rather than the agenda.

  • @1God3manifestations: "REAL Science doesn't conflict with Faith."

    With faith? No, not necessarily. With faith-based "explanations" about the real world? Always.

  • meh... seems mildly interesting.

    But as with most Christian films, it's seems way too preachy. That's THE biggest issue I have with these type of films. Stop TELLING me constantly through the character's dialogue or beating it over my head with the incoherent plot that God is right all the time. Instead, use the plot and the character to tell a story that DOESN'T blandly make it a science vs. faith conflict. Think LOST where producers generally weave spiritual themes without being overt with it

  • This is a fantastic movie. Does everyone who hates this film post under such great names as "Useless knowlede" and "Rotting in the Midwest"? I'll stick to more positive thinking, thanks.

  • @dld1431

    you mean wishful thinking?

  • Um. When was it, exactly, that science 'feared' religion?

  • @OMGmyEYE That means respected or obeyed. Before Charles Darwin no one challenged Creation.

  • @OMGmyEYE

    ever heard of galileo?

  • fred thomopson was in die hard 2, but even that cannot add value to this steaming turd of a motion picture.

  • This movie looks interesting. It appears as if it sheds light on the conflict of faith and science. I'm excited to see it! Plus, Fred Thompson is the man!

  • @nazor1 yeah it was there...i was there during filming.

  • My dad was a extra! XD

  • I don't get it! what it is about?

  • @TheFines05 Obviously, it's an attempt to blur the line between science and religion. The "scientific world consensus is just a satanic conspiracy" angle no longer works too well in this day and age. Now it's about trying to convince others that science agrees that the world was created in 6 literal days...or that the world really is around 6,000 years old. No, it doesn't and no it isn't. Don't get your science from preachers and pundits. Go read a science book.

  • Have always liked Logan Bartholomew and one day I'll get him as the lead actor when my book gets turned into a movie = ^ ^ =

  • Gensis CODE!!!!!!! That looks like the museum in Grand Rapids, was this filmed there?

    Not sure if this is related to the Omega Code, but that movie was corny I'm sorry. But if this is filmed in GR, I'm hoping the best for it.

  • This looks like an okay Christian film & there are so few Bible Movies ever to come to a theater near you.

  • @archangelum: What is an "okay christian film"? :)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more