Great videos and interesting arguements. My violin making teacher was into tap tuning always going for a difference between front and back. Whilst this was her way of building, she was more concerned that you found a way that suited you and you then stuck to it. Consistency being the method. Then you could change things and respond to the materials used. Another method was to weigh the plates. Whatever works for you. Interesting to see this applies on other instruments. Didnt use this on mine.
Somogyi is better known in the acoustic guitar world, where his guitars start at $26,000 US.
Science and mathematics are important in instrument design and construction. For example, it's nearly impossible to determine exact fret placement without the help of science and mathematics, because musical intervals follow mathematical ratios that we've have known about for more than 2,500 years now. (Thanks Pythagoras!) Sound is physics and physics is science, so why exclude it from guitar design?
Wonderful video. Very many thanks. I don't understand the comment by the publisher (guitargourmet) that the two opinions are not as far apart as you may think. What do you mean? To me they are as far away as they could possibly be. Opposite approaches. North and South pole. Night and day. To me Romanillos is more convincing.
If you watch the next video it starts to make more sense. Both builders are saying that you can't just tap-tune the guitar top to a specific pitch because the rest of the guitar (once assembled) has a huge bearing on the tuning of the top too. Instead, they're both saying you want to tune the top as low as it can safely go, and you want to eliminate any dead spots (nodal points) so that as much of the top is producing sound as possible in its first vibrational mode. Different words is all.
The other reason you can't tune the top to a specific pitch is because every piece of wood is different, even from the bottom of a tree to the top of the same tree. A given soundboard may have different dimensions and/or weight to reach the proper stiffness because of these inconsistencies in the wood. Therefore, a single universal tap-tuned pitch will not apply to every guitar. Hence their similar philosophies of using tap-tuning to just lower the tapped pitch and eliminate nodal points.
@enricopg1 I think I understand what he means because I think Somogyi is not trying to tune his top, but to even the response across the surface. Two different things.
@enricopg1 I think I understand what he means because I think Somogyi is not trying to tune his top, but to even the response across the surface. Two different things.
This is the kind of advanced information and theory that cannot come from textbooks. Thanks for putting this up.
slowfinger2 1 year ago
Great videos and interesting arguements. My violin making teacher was into tap tuning always going for a difference between front and back. Whilst this was her way of building, she was more concerned that you found a way that suited you and you then stuck to it. Consistency being the method. Then you could change things and respond to the materials used. Another method was to weigh the plates. Whatever works for you. Interesting to see this applies on other instruments. Didnt use this on mine.
Flamingrae 1 year ago
Science has no place in building quality guitars.
poupee58 2 years ago
Who the heck is Ervin Somogyi ? He is not a well known classical guitar maker.
poupee58 2 years ago
Somogyi is better known in the acoustic guitar world, where his guitars start at $26,000 US.
Science and mathematics are important in instrument design and construction. For example, it's nearly impossible to determine exact fret placement without the help of science and mathematics, because musical intervals follow mathematical ratios that we've have known about for more than 2,500 years now. (Thanks Pythagoras!) Sound is physics and physics is science, so why exclude it from guitar design?
kithkinavrien 2 years ago
Wonderful video. Very many thanks. I don't understand the comment by the publisher (guitargourmet) that the two opinions are not as far apart as you may think. What do you mean? To me they are as far away as they could possibly be. Opposite approaches. North and South pole. Night and day. To me Romanillos is more convincing.
enricopg1 2 years ago
If you watch the next video it starts to make more sense. Both builders are saying that you can't just tap-tune the guitar top to a specific pitch because the rest of the guitar (once assembled) has a huge bearing on the tuning of the top too. Instead, they're both saying you want to tune the top as low as it can safely go, and you want to eliminate any dead spots (nodal points) so that as much of the top is producing sound as possible in its first vibrational mode. Different words is all.
kithkinavrien 2 years ago
The other reason you can't tune the top to a specific pitch is because every piece of wood is different, even from the bottom of a tree to the top of the same tree. A given soundboard may have different dimensions and/or weight to reach the proper stiffness because of these inconsistencies in the wood. Therefore, a single universal tap-tuned pitch will not apply to every guitar. Hence their similar philosophies of using tap-tuning to just lower the tapped pitch and eliminate nodal points.
kithkinavrien 2 years ago
@enricopg1 I think I understand what he means because I think Somogyi is not trying to tune his top, but to even the response across the surface. Two different things.
slowfinger2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@enricopg1 I think I understand what he means because I think Somogyi is not trying to tune his top, but to even the response across the surface. Two different things.
slowfinger2 1 year ago
thank you man for uploading this interview, is mind blowing.
opidacul 2 years ago
Absolutely amazing! Thank you very much for uploading such wonderful videos :D
deegz 2 years ago 4
I agree
umbyronco85 2 years ago 2