Added: 4 years ago
From: zippypop34
Views: 43,593
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (123)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol the top comments are funny nowadays, thats crappy water effects

  • I wish it had PhysX water.

  • Impressive on his times, casual right now

  • imagine if it wasnt scripted but dynamic...... that would be orgasmic :3

  • This water is so awesome! Better as DiRT 2 or crysis!

  • this water is all scripted. It looks great, but the ripples etc are awfull.

  • is only an animation.. thats not "real water" like GTA 4 or... Dirt 2 etc

  • reminds me of the original unreal 10 years ago because of the vast amounts of water and water effects

  • unless you know other wys of fucking? :-\

  • hes on to me...

  • yeh it's best

  • wow from 2007 this still has best water.

  • @Samst0rm best? u r dreaming... thats only an animation.. thats not like real water... In GTA 4 or Dirt 2 u can see realistic water.. u cant interact with water on Bioshock (sorry for my english)

  • BEST WATER GRAPHIC

  • All the shots you shown look just like the ones in dx9 :|

  • I was stunned about 2 effects in bioshock.

    1. obviously the water, which looks just deliciously fantastic.

    2. the glass. bioshock was the first game i saw which had real glass effects. for example, early in the game you walk through a glass corridor and suddenly a piece of the plane crashes right into it. you can see that the broken/chipped glass had depth. it's not just a flat texture of broken glass. the cracks go deep in the glass. a not-so-important but awesome effect ^^

  • Agreed.

  • I think, the water in Bioshock is really magnificent.

  • in one part there is a big daddy walking by himself in the water outside weird WTF moment!!

  • Think bioshock has some of the best water effects

  • water in indoors is looking great in that game... but try to look outside a large window, when bubbles rise up... that's awful! - btw, not really a great game... preferred the original System shock 1 and 2 storyline...

  • dont want to look like an idiot but can someone tell me what anti-aliasing is? anything would be helpful

  • it makes the edges on models, walls, all smoother

  • thanxs :)

  • Its little men the more x the more little men running around with the iron and getting the creases out ;)

  • go see it in the game I am sure it will change ur mind

  • Go see it in the game I am sure it will change ur mind

  • The one at 0:26 looks like shit, in my opinion. But that's the bad sprites, not DX10.

  • THAT GAME IS AMAZING!!!!!!!!!

  • Holy Crap!!! Thats amazing!!!

  • yeah bioshock have quite good water, no question.

    but Crysis have better :P

  • Imo they aren't directly comparable.

  • in regard to antoes question yes the radeon 3870 is ok it well difinatly play bioshock smoothly however i would consider buying a nvidia bfg 8800gt oc2: much better

  • now thats sexy

  • agreed.

  • man how can i get a rebate!¿??

  • just ordered xfx overclocked 8600gt. 680mhz core clock. And only 70$ after rebate. Cant wait to test it out on my new system.

  • im sorry but a 7900GS is better :/, but it doesnt have Directx 10...

  • cards better then u think, runs everything i have on maxed out on 720p cept crysis of course, witch it runs some high some medium.

  • does anyone think that the saphire ati radeon HD 3870 is ok??sum1 pleez write bac!tanx

  • it is a quality graphics card, will run bioshock easily.

    also check out the 8800GT and the 9600GT.

    whats the rest of your pc spec?

  • Your card will run this game at maximum graphics. I had a sapphire radeon 2600XT (which cost like 90$) and I could run this at maximum graphics, DX 10, 1024x768 resolution (but no anti-aliasing). Id say its definitely on the same level as the 8800GT.

  • do you think that the geforce 8600 gts is ok to run games like this??

  • yes an 8600gt is ok!

  • does bioshock runs smoothly on ur computer? I have geforce 8600 gt too and I want to know

  • i havent actually installed ityet im waiting for my fiend to install a new power supply for the grafix card i only had a 250 watt i tink im gettin it done 2nite il let u know

  • I have a GeForce 8600M GT 256MB and it runs smoothly with everything on max. 1440x900 resolution.

  • And i thought Half-Life 2 had nice hidro effects.This is stuningly beautiful.

  • OH MY GOD

  • These guys have used a totally different new engine just for the water effects.

    No wonder they look beautifull!

    I love everything -

    The textures, bumps, distortions, water reflections, splashes, ambient lights, and ambient music/sounds

    Great game!

    Now that it came out, i need to update my pc a little xD

  • Incredible incredible graphics all i can say...

    kick ass! the only problem is keeping ur PC up to date...

  • you dont need a really good pc to play the game in dx9!

  • Ive got READON ATI 9600 series, i put the games graphics all the way to low and still i dont see what im ment to see :(...

    help?

    Or just a new graphics card?

  • i play the game with 30 and some times 40 fps with an 7900GTX card. But in comparison with other games it doesnt need a ultra high end pc to play.

  • @seriousllya

    the radeon 9600 is a shader model 2.0 card.

    bioshock officially only supports shader model 3.0.

    there is an unnoficial patch that enables you to use shader model 2.0 but it is glitchy & even on low settings with your card you would probably only to be able to yeild about 10fps which is not playable at all.

    condsidering the age of your gfx card the rest of your system is old so i would reccomend that you either but or make an ew system.

  • Thanks!

    That helped me alot ive got the idea i think. So i have to get shader 3 or something?

    Nah ill just buy a gt (8800 -- half the prise and almost as good as the gtx)

  • In the water there is....more water...

    LoL.

    Incredible effects however.

  • the name "what's in the water" got me soo interested in watching the clip lol. i was hoping for survival/shark attack lol.

  • lool me too

  • whats in the water lol

  • oh my god are those the real graphics?!?

    Looks like an animated movie now! imagine what it will be like in another 10 years

  • directx 20? xD

  • yea...that would be so awesome! Can't wait to see the graphics!

  • Nah i dout... many people think of feature like:

    Metal city buildings, sky height and all but we are already starting to run out of resources...

    Anyway, probably DX13 though. Can you really list me more than 5 new features in graphics?

    Theres preety much everything already.

    But yeah these graphics still own

  • the game is just Awesome ! buy it ;)

  • the 360 use a custome version of directx 9, it is possible to program these directx 10 effects into the 360's api, however, the system lacks the system memmory to properly display these effects properly in high definition.

  • Impossible. 360 doesn't support DirectX 10.

  • I am waiting for Crysis and Bioshock

  • Bioshock is out...

  • is there any reason i cant seem to enable DX10 on the Demo? is it not supported or something because its a demo?

  • do you have vista?

  • DX10 and DX10 effects are exclusive to Vista so yes he has Vista

  • lol obviously the guy who made the vid has vista, but i was asking Malm1231... unless of course you were referring to my question him in which case, yes i know that they are exclusive... but i wasnt sure if malm knew

    either way someone already said that dx10 isnt enabled in the demo...

  • Sorry, didn't see your comment as a 'reply'

  • no worries :)

  • You know if you reply to someone, then they recieve an email usually, and are more likely to respond. Thats why they have a reply link...

  • I bet all the people who complain about no difference are the people who bought it for 360 and want to reassure themselves that they made the right choice. This video has almost lower of a resolution than VGA so of course you're not going to see a difference. Put them side by side at 2560*1600 and I'm sure you'll see a pretty big difference once games really start taking advantage of it.

  • um crankin the resolution that high is doing nothing but up scalen and plus 360 i use which has HDMI which is the same as using DVI they both use digital signals and plus xbox 360 is capable of direct x10 as it is using the one version of the R600 which is basicly a 2700? or 2800? but i know its called the Xenos

  • HDMI has a maximum resolution of 1920*1080, DVI has a max resolution right now of 3840*2400. Not the same thing. I'm sure Xbox360 doesn't lack support for it but the problem is the lack of system/graphics memory. And what I was saying is with the low resolution of this vid you can't really see any detail. If you put it in high resolution you'll be able to see everything clearly and tell a difference.

  • /i love the 360 but the computer just owns. nothing to it.

  • see no difference between Dx9 and Dx10?

    some people should be shot...and people who can't see the difference are permantly added to that list.

    the detail may be small, but worth it IMO.

  • I don't see any difference at all... the water isn't even realtime in dx10

  • 0.0

  • this made me want to pee

  • rofl intigfx

  • i see NOTHIGN that hasn't been done in DX9!

  • im gonna have to do some upgrading

  • mmh dx9 has same effects in that game so dx10 aint worth it:)

  • actually, i played the bioshock demo on my dx9 card, and many of these effects (water reflections on walls, watter trickling down stairs) werent there.. but yeah, similar, but not the same... a lot of the basic refraction, reflection effects were there but not more fine details like i mentioned

  • The reason you didn't see those effects is because they aren't in the demo area. I have the full game and i've seen them in later areas.

  • to all the people using vista 4 gaming here... XD

    LOL just buy a console because clearly you don't know shit son... turn off the security crap?... im not going to educate your sorry ass on this one, do whatever the hell you want, i dont care, its your computer, it just needs a better user

  • have you ever seen professional gaming on tv.

    even the experts agree that DX10 is better than the console or DX9.

  • i am runing vista right now and i can tell you theres nothing wrong with it. my system is 2 gb's of dual chanel ddr 2 ram, 2x 8600 gts's superclocked (evga) and a amd 4200+ x2 i have been playing games such as oblvion (which i can run at full at around 50 fps) and lost plantet in dx 10 wich looks amazing. as a response the reason you cant get dx10 on a zp machine is because its just not compatible.

  • I'll b gettin this game on xbox 360 for sure, it looks great the way light reflects off the water and all the other effects are just great, the only thing is vista is simply...SHIT and all the dx10 cards available at the moment, the best of which (8800 gtx) can hardly handle any of the dx10 games, its rubbish!

  • You clearly have no idea what your on about, look at the benchmarks for the bottom of the range SX10 compatible cards (8800 GTS 320MB) and you'll see that it more than copes with games such as lost planet and runs them with frame rates into the hundreds. As for vista, it's in its early stages and as with every other windows OS in its infancy, they have there bugs and glitches but in time these will be smoothed out and the majority of people will be using vista.

  • nice, but im not going to use vista. NEVER. EVER. EVARRR

    and i have a dx10 video card...

  • Never.. not even If they fix vista up?

  • fix wat? vista is terrible, im not going to use a os that tells me what to do, what to play, how to play it, that requires validations and reactivations anything. this time ms went to far

    is not about the user, its about protecting corporate interest and screw the user. plus its

    broken, slow and bloated. I have a really good pc

    and im not going to infect it with vista.

  • I agree they should really listen to what the user wants in an OS. like.... No stupid activation. Dx10 for vista and XP so you don't have to use vista if you don't need. Give the Option to Install it with out all the extra crap.

    And Put options in the security center to turn off the annoying alerts! Sad to say as much as I agree and want it to change I bit the bullet and install vista only for the DX10 Games. I can say this. If you can turn off the secuity crap its not that bad.

  • You can turn off the security crap you fucking moron. Maybe learn to use an OS before criticizing one.

  • Hey there dip shit maybe you should learn to think before criticizing someone. I know very well that you can do that from the security center, but that just tells the security center to stop bothering you and not the over all OS you would still get the UAP Warning Dialogs prompts for everything else.Which is not an option found in the Security Center.

  • Having said that, I find that you insulting me without a true just cause was ignorant of you and just plain immature. Hell its an OS its not like I'm stealing from you or trying to wrong you.

  • elfgod, good luck playing halo 2.

    p.s the way you think, you probably don't like

    halo.

  • ah ha.. see that where your too quick to judge. I love halo. Always have always will. at least until they do something stupid with the franchise. thankfully they haven't.

    I think and talk the way I do on you tube cause of the horrible experience I get on here where people basically bash other people out of ignorance or because they feel they have the right too. Usially happens for no stupid reason.

  • They have done some stupid with the franchise; its called HALO 2

  • heh yeah thats true. Cant beat the original

  • But the performance is still suffering even with an 8800 GTS with an E6600 3.0Ghz core 2 duo. Xp Is still the king when it comes to performance. Vista.. is just another pretty face in the croud. YA YA I swear it was going to be a one night stand but that vista was there when I woke up.

  • that's pathetic performance.

    God, PC games are barely optimized these days...

  • how was that pathetic? looked like fairly good performance to me.

  • was responding to elfgod's comment just to clear that up

  • Yeah its not bad but if we where to compare the raw fps in game you would see a drop and Microsoft said that direct x10 was going to make the dx9 games run better. Buts its yet to be seen. I'm sure things will speed up later on.

  • your a moron who doesn't understand what DirectX10 does it doesn't make games run better, it allows games to run better. Do some research you computer n00b and don't make statements until you know what you are talking about

  • Stop nick picking you bastard. Also thats a stuuupid augment.

    I have read.

    "Directx10 hardware in conjunction with directx10 on vista will significantly improve performance in directx9 games"

    IT MAKES DX9 GAMES RUN BETTER!

  • Yeah you call me a noob but I don't think you know what your talking about. I've also done benchmarks and measured frames, so I know very well what I'm talking about. So don't insult me for what I've read. If anything disagree with me but don't insult me cause its just pathetic and childish.

  • Straight from microsoft

    DirectX 10 features heavily enhanced 3-D graphics-rendering capabilities and helps noticeably improve your computer's performance in games and high-end 3-D applications. DirectX 10 empowers games to present a new generation of visual effects

    Rendering CAPABILITIES. Its not gonna make it run faster, but BE ABLE to run faster.

  • watch a good video artard.

  • Ive had no problems with the performance of vista and if the only directX10 OS then i'm going to use it. Or you can just dual boot windows so you can use both.

  • Well, then you my friend are a dumbass.

  • isn't it funny how the whole premise of this game is similar to fallout in so many ways

  • yeah theres fallout spirit absolutely - this post apocalypse theme is amazing - thanks god for this guys work - fallout is dead - fuk bethesda :((

  • in the fact that their both dystopias yes but i wouldn't really say phillip k dicks second variety is the same as margaret atwood's oryx and crake. so no its not funny and its not really a great comparison

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more