@Garpalt He does not have any communist tattoos, nor is he a communist. He is talking about Anarchism, and his tattoos are representative of that. These are two very different worldviews. Communism, often in theory and how it has been practiced, establishes the necessity for hierarchy. Anarchism seeks horizontal organization, and the establishment of directly democratic modes of political/economic organization.
Read his blog. Monson gets a rude awakening after visiting a post-socialist Russian hospital. I wonder if he will now scrub off his communist tattoos.
The guy took too many punches because everyone knows that anarchy would never ever work. When there are no laws, courts, prison and all of that, it would take a week and you would end up in a world where only the survival of the fittest counts. A very sad world for the weaker, unarmed or unable to defend themselves. A world without rules would never work because it's not in the nature of man to respect eachother.
Anarchism is based on an equal distribution of decision-making power, customary law, council courts, and so forth. So there are no "weaker" people in anarchy, as there is equal distribution of power.
No it doesn't. The EZLN has implemented a system based on equal distribution of power in the form of popular councils (participatory democracy) since 1994, so it does work.
@GodOfTheInternets Basicly anarchists are idiots. Give me an example of an anarchistic society, or country ? And i'm not talking about communish because what you write is more like communism. A lawless society would never work but I guess for criminals it sounds tempting.
In 1500 someone would ask "give me one example of a parliamentary democracy" you would not be able to give him one. Does this mean parl.democracy does not work? Obviously not. This is a fallacy called argument from ignorance.
Anarchism does not mean lawlessness. Anarchist and anarchic societies include Anarchist Ukraine (1918-1921), Anarchist Spain (1936), EZLN's Chiapas (1994-present). The former two were crushed by external force.
Wat een onzin. Ik heb precies gedaan waar jij om vroeg: werkende anarchistische samenleving tonen, en daarnaast heb ik je ontkracht dat anarchisten dom zijn, of dat anarchisme en recht niet bij elkaar passen. En dan in plaats van je op de argumenten te richten ga je onzin uitkramen?
Dat filmpje was een aankondiging van een anarchistische demonstratie voor vrijheid en tegen het rechtse gedoogkabinet.
@GodOfTheInternets Jij hebt helemaal niets "ontkracht" behalve je eigen onzin. Ik ken waarschijnlijk meer zelfbenoemde anarchisten dan jij. Stuk voor stuk nietsnutten. Allemaal werkloos, lusteloos, met dreadlocks doch zo blank als een glas melk. Ze zijn voor een leven zonder wetten, waar alles mag en alles kan. Ze zijn tegen alle instellingen van de overheid behalve de instelling die hun uitkering of hun drugs betaalt. Losers, en nutteloos voor de maatschappij. Dat is de gemiddelde "anarchist".
Pfff, ik wordt hier zo ontzettend moe van. Je gooit drogredenen achter elkaar. Ten eerste is je "argument" een argumentum ad hominem, je valt de personen aan en niet de theorie. Ten tweede is het onzin. De meerderheid van de anarchisten die ik ken werken gewoon. Ten derde herhaal ik me nog maar een keer: ANARCHIE BETEKEND NIET WETTELOOSHEID. Dus je hele argument is nergens op gebaseerd. In een anarchistische samenleving heb je gewoon wetten.
@GodOfTheInternets Je latijn is blijkbaar beter dan je Nederlands want "betekent" is met een T gezien het geen voltooid deelwoord betreft. Maar goed, dit terzijde. Anarchisme wil simpelweg zeggen "ieder vorm van gezag of authoriteit afwijzen". Dat weet iedereen. Het is spijtig genoeg zo goed als onmogelijk om wetten op te leggen als er geen gezag of autoriteit is. Nogmaals, op zich vind ik dat een mooi idee, wie is er niet tegen autoriteit ? Zelfs het kleinste kind.
Anarchisme is inderdaad tegen het opleggen van gezag, een moordernaar en verkrachter leggen autoriteit op, dus is het niet tegen anarchistische principes om dat te verbieden. Google "anarchisme en recht" en dan de wikipedia pagina.
En het "argument" dat mensen het niet willen is een drogreden, een argumentum ad populum.
Communisme is trouwens ook een staatsloze samenleving, maar dat terzijde.
En nee, mijn Nederlands is bar slecht omdat ik meer met engels te maken heb.
@GodOfTheInternets Tenzij je zelf een autoritaire rol speelt, dan is het weer heel leuk, zo zitten de meeste mensen nu eenmaal in elkaar. Ik kan me trouwens geen anarchistische "leider" voorstellen die GEEN autoriteit zal uitoefenen. Heel dubbelzinnig. En ook al zijn er verschillende gematigde of minder gematigde strekkingen, lijkt het me zeer onwaarschijnlijk om een goed systeem in elkaar te steken.
@GodOfTheInternets Het enige wat ik daar nog wil op zeggen is dat anarchisme het dichtst bij wetteloosheid of straffeloosheid staat. En daar zijn de meeste mensen, begrijpelijk, gewoonweg tegen. Besluit : zonder autoriteit of gezag een maatschappij opbouwen, het klinkt mooi, maar het zal enkel werken in sprookjes want de mens zit nu eenmaal anders in elkaar. Communisme zit iets beter in elkaar maar we zien dat het ook niet alles is. Maar goed, ieder zijn overtuiging.
@GodOfTheInternets Trouwens voor mij mag dat wel, een wetteloze en straffeloze maatschappij waar alles mag en alles kan. Ik ben een stuk meer bewapend dan de gemiddelde persoon dus mij kan het niet bommen. Spijtig genoeg is niet iedereen in staat zichzelf te verweren. Het is je misschien nog niet opgevallen tussen je stompzinnige pseudo intellectuele zever dat er ook zwakkeren zijn in de maatschappij. En indien er een anarchistische samenleving zou zijn, staan die mensen nergens.
@GodOfTheInternets Anarchie zal altijd vervallen in de wet van de sterkste. En niet iedereen is dan in staat om gelijke kansen te krijgen. Zonder structuur, regering of wetten ga je terug naar de wet van de jungle. Dat is anarchie. Klinkt leuk voor zij die meestal uit eigenbelang dergelijke systemen mooipraten. Hun drugs zijn dan toegestaan. Ze worden dan niet meer gestraft om oudjes te beroven, of meer van dat fraais. Tja, voor dergelijke "mensen" klinkt anarchie inderdaad goed. Hun probleem.
Je hebt anarchie in de zin van 'wetteloosheid', maar je hebt ook anarchie in de zin van de sociale en politieke theorie van het anarchisme. Dat gaat inderdaad over een samenleving zonder regering, maar zonder regering betekent zeker niet zonder structuur of zonder regels.
Trouwens grappig dat je anarchisten als nietsnutten met dreadlocks omschrijft in de commentaarsectie van een clip waar een hard-trainende, hardwerkende kale kerel over anarchisme praat.
And also, I would like to point out there are numerous anarchist academics. The most cited living scholar is an anarchist. And in Holland a Dutch anarchist (Thom Holterman) was an associate professor of law who wrote numerous books on anarchist forms of law codes.
My guess is, these anarchist scholars in general and Holterman in particular are not (all) idiots.
The problem with anarchy is that people don't get along without the threat of violence. If we all agreed, got along, and worked together then we wouldn't have most of our laws today. Not that I disagree with Jeff. I definitely agree in principle. But making it work is damn near impossible when every other asshole is trying to take what's yours.
And that is somehow an argument? Customary law, presumably in addition with free contract, - i.e. autonomous law as opposed to heteronomous law -- would be sufficient in an anarchist society. I don't see how immigrants somehow make such source of law invalid.
i actually interested in what will happen, i know jeff is gonna prepare extra hard for this so i wanna c what happens, and stop saying he is old or out of is prime, he just lately not fighting very smart thats all, he didnt lose anything look at him from a fighter's prospective what did he lose?speed?power? no he didnt just not prepared, a good examples of fedor prepared are cro cop and nogueria fights.
arlovski, big foot,werdum, dan not so much look it up and compare
I must say that fedor before he lost his first fight,he didnt fought with ang big names apart Nogueira.My viev for fedor next fight is if fedor will not knock out Monson in 30/40 sek ,Monson gona take him dow and submit him.
@iceman4180 i think cuz they want 2 co-promote u know like strikeforce/m1 fedor vs rogers they want events where they get money for really not doing much, fedor manager is vadim who is the president of m1 so its kinda of a problem for fedor 2 fight in the ufc with him in charge
Monson has no business being in the ring with a guy like Fedor. Monson trains down at our Acadame' but he is not at that level. Too much juice, no stamina, no striking....He is very strong and marketable. But he is NOT champion material.
@ChrisAtWar93 Well Fedor is the best heavyweight of all time....But, yes he is older now and is not very competitive anymore. But Monson has never been a contender in Pride or UFC. He looks like he can kill everyone; but he does not have the tools or the skill set. He's very tough, but he's a career journeyman.
@BJJHomos lol cain, dos santos, brock, overeem and countless other hw would ragedoll a prime fedor. and monson has some of the best grappling credentials in mma so i think he beats fedor
@ChrisAtWar93 None of those guys would "ragdoll" Fedor. Many bigger guys have tried. Monson will not ragdoll a 12 time world sambo champion. Fedor wins. By KO or Kimura.
@TheReverendDB big foot ragdolled fedor and he lost to Daniel Cormier, fedor aint tht good and never has been, henderson ko'ed him and hendo would get fucked by cain, santos, lesner and overeem and the "many bigger guys" werent top class at the time or ever really
@ChrisAtWar93 Fanboy of REAL MMA fighters maybe bud. I make tributes for fighters who have done something to represent the sport and what it's about just so happens Fedor is the only true real martial artist in MMA. To his core its what he is. Honor, respect, valor, and integrity. The man has never bashed another fighter (except with his fists) for any reason. Every other fighter has at some point or another. FACT. Fighters who give the sport a good name deserve respect. Fedor = Dangerous -Hendo
@ChrisAtWar93 205.... But that's not the point. Did you even read that? the SPORT isn't about winning and losing, it's about Honor and Respect. Fedor embodies what the sport is really about, Zuffa and Dana White have made it into a business where legends of the sport who have helped push it to where it is don't get recognized or are swept under the rug. He is the greatest of all time Martial Artist. Because he's one of the few who's still a REAL martial artist and not a Zuffa Zombie fighter...
@TheReverendDB back track o what u first said, and u dont know him, or anyone in mma most likely so y romantisize him, what has he done for the sport, he wouldnt fight the best in the world and prove his the best, and then when forced to fight rank guys he looses
@ChrisAtWar93 I know a lot of the MMA fighters bud. I'm an amateur fighter myself and MMA analyst/journalist. He's done plenty for the sport like shown that a man can be a fighter and a person. They're too often represented by fighters today as THUGS and big mouthed bums. He has beaten the best, of his time. Nog, Cro Cop, Herring, Coleman, Sylvia, Arlovski. Guys who all at one time were considered "The best in the world" at one thing or another. And he beat them. Best of his age. No arguing it.
@TheReverendDB funny how he went from being grreatest of all time, to greatest of his time. anyway ur clearly a blind fanboi hating on the ufc. back to the start fedor would be killed by the top 5 heavyweights and i dont care if his a good person or not, just saying he aint tht good anymore and i dont think he was eve tht god
@ChrisAtWar93 greatest of all time in tactfulness and respect. Greatest of his time in skill. Not a blind fan boy. History shows us that the only thing people love more than watching a hero succeed is watching them fail. Who do you think is the best MMA fighter right now?
All the sudden laughter in the background, when they mentioned Monson and Fedor. lol. This is the same guy who can't beat Tim Sylvia, and possibly Cornbread (Kimbo) Slice.
I know what your saying but I think the the definition of anarchy is absence of government and laws. Communism requires central control of almost every aspect of social and economics - right? Then like everything on the left, its a misnomer. I know there are many people trying to take down capitalism and replace it with communism, but if you think about it - how are goods and services going to reach market? This especially if you consider a transition period it takes to make the change.
@Zresponder Communists believe that there must be a phase of preparation beetwen capitalism and COmmunism...that phase is called Socialism... Anarchist say that phase dont need to exist... Communists say that the work of everyone should be shared by the whole societyu... Anarchist may work for himselfs without sharing nothing... I think that is the main differences... Im still studyng Anarchy... But i know COmmunism is wwhat i sayd to u
@SamcoPowa its not over hes gonna continue fighting if not in big org than in smalls ones everywhere but hes not that washed up so he'll come back after beating monson, the only reason people think he'll lose this fight is cuz hes in a loosing streak and they dont really look at the fighters and at there skills 2 compare and assume who wins they just look at fedor record
which is a combination of socialist and capitalist economic ideologies if you didn't already know that. And Norway does in fact have a mixed economy, so there is a combination of free market and gov owned industry (socialist ideology fyi). So yes Scandinavia is not pure socialist, but if you read my comments I never said they were. They do, however have elements of socialism in their government looping me back to my original statement "Democratic socialism".
jeffs gotta get really famous in this shit, if you think about it hes part of the system, if he gets a lot of money doing this from advertsising then he should use some money to help awake and educate ppl. he could infulence alot of ppl just becuase of who he is. WE NEED MORE MONSONS.
This guy is a truelly wobbly, same path of a lot of hard blue collar working class men and women. Its is always pleasant to watch and listen to a well educated sportsman not only reproducing ideology of supremacy - like a Nike's advertising - but someone who really cares about living in a wealthy and decent society. S y RS Jeff Monson.
Every man for himself. survival of the fittest. eat what you kill. thats what i believe in. everyone mind their own business. for those who wanna help others, thats there business.
@ClearwaterMMA Too bad humans have never lived that way. We're social animals, and that's what has allowed us to make it to the top. Social Darwinism yearns for a past that never was. Naive tools for the rich.
@GodOfTheInternets why because he doesn't want other people to be able to tell him what to do? that is true Anarchism, Individual Anarchy, what you describe is other people having a vote, and a say over what others do, a tyranny of the majority, which is against personal liberty, and true Anarchism, you leftist fucks try to subvert the definition of Anarchy, just like you try to rewrite history, anyone that has a thinking mind, sees through your lies, that you want to control other people
and they've thrown away whats bad about both worlds. The greed of pure capitalism which indirectly controls the people (lobbiests, ad campaigns ect.), and the ineffectiveness of the socialist power structure. So they have regulated businessmen which keeps them from becoming greedy bitches AND they have democratically elected leaders to keep them from becoming power hungry mad men.
Capitalism got an production model which based on surplus value, instead of total social needs. With neo-liberal politics after cold war, class contradictions became much more appear. Each day, people who live in countries which exploited by imperalism as a cheaper labor die because of malnutrition and preventable diseases. And in that bloody system which only works for bourgeois, people who curse Cuba despite all the rates i just gave, are disingenuous to me.
I'm a libertarian socialist, and there are many things i criticise about Cuba. But people are really brainwashed about Cuba, thanks to USA's propaganda. Actually, according to UNESCO Cuba has the lowest illiteracy rate and the highest matriculation rate of all the countries in Latin America. Life expectancy is 76.5% in Cuba while in Latin America it is 70 years. Cuba has the highest percentage of doctors per person in the world. Only country where there are %0 malnutrition etc.
we just ned to get rid of obama 1 ore year bsides i live in america and all of are men are being made into pussies we need to be real men again working on cars chopping wood fighting playing outside in the drit insted of living in our room playing fucking halo or world of warcraft
@whisplee Anarchist communism (also known as anarcho-communism and occasionally as free communism) is a theory of anarchism which advocates the abolition of the state, private property, and capitalism in favor of common ownership of the means of production, direct democracy and a horizontal network of voluntary associations and workers' councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle: "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need".
@MrSteveParr The first problem comes in defining "ability" and "need" and assigning values of each to the individual. It would become a game where people would try to prove they had very little ability and very great need. Not to sound too Ayn Rand-ian, but I can't see that I would be particularly motivated in that system. Also, those who decide who is able and who is needy would be the corruptible power brokers.
@rrpostalagain Then you have the whole forced labor issue. The only way to ensure that the honest people that do work keep working is to make them work or to make the dregs work also. The community would find a way to motivate you or they would banish you. Being close knit and protective as any community would have to be in order to place ones survival directly in the hands of ones neighbor, strangers won’t be trusted. To be banished could prove to be a death sentence.
@rrpostalagain Large cities would erupt into chaos and be completely destroyed in a month. Once all the 18 wheelers stop running because the is no currency to buy oil to make diesel to put in the pumps there will be nothing to eat in the grocery store. Image millions dead, lying on the streets and highways radiating outward 100 miles in all directions form L.A., Atlanta, N.Y., Chicago, ect, ect. Maybe 200 million dead nation wide. Mostly starved or murdered for a can of corn.
I think he might have mentioned the IWW briefly in there. I was curious as to whether or not there is a union representing prize fighters. I think it certainly would be a good idea.
That's the way the corporations want it. A few rich (1%) of individuals owning the majority of the wealth, while the rest of the 99% compete for the scraps that are left.
@14SlavsUnited88 пидараст и федор и брат выложили видео что они не националисты и что они не навидят этих пидарастов нацистов... нацисты на столько чмошные что хотя переписать себе всех пошел вон а то наду шакал башку тебе оторву пидараст
@loserluver100 YES! Barbarianism.Thats why all nations either rise and fall,or rise,and are conquerd by their oppressed. Rome was conquerd by lesser status ,bullied around, barbaric Visigoth and Celtic tribes who were oppressed by the romans. If there was more diplomatic civility in Rome's (democracy) leadership Rome may have never been attacked and burnt to the ground. But it only took a few assholes with a power trip to piss off the barbarians. The goths and celts were tribal, no government.
@mquirk00 That isn't the only, or even the main reason rome fell. Rome started out very disciplined, devoted to their cause. They lived simple lives and were very militaristic. After their success the majority of the populace drifted toward indulging in the excesses that came with their success. They lost the discipline and devotion to their country and gave in to satisfying their personal greedy needs. Later, when the empire came under attack, their legionaires were rusty.
@LeedansParis Actually, it is a type of socialism, in the sense of natural resources and the means of production being socialized. "Anarcho-capitalism" would better be named anachro-capitalism.
@Hatchyack Thanks Hatch. I agree that anarcho is better in lower case because it isn't a title. However, while I think anyone is free to form whatever type of community they choose, including socialist, shared resource based communities, I find it doesn't support individualism and freedom to the extent a purely anarcho-capitalism would.
@murisonfamily Actually Communism is the logical extreme of Anarchism. Lenin-Marxism like the Soviets was not Communist, it was a top-down form of Socialism supposively trying to create Communism.
In Communism there can be no rulers, since everyone is considered equal and no one is given special privilege in society. No kings, no congress, no corporations, no slaves, no scapegoats, no war and no homeless, that is Communism.
@Atalay why don't you state he is right if he talks about social-anarchism, where people can have a vote or say to control other people, a tyranny of the majority, mob rule, which is totally against what anarchism should be. Individual Anarchism is true liberty, no man has a say over another man, you cannot tell me what to do, that is true anarchy. You leftist fucks keep Communism and Socialism, and stop trying to claim you are anarchists, when you want to control others.
first off monson is a badass. im all for everybody being able to have decent living conditions with education, medical, food, etc but unfortunately there will always be competition for it because as much as some people refuse to admit we live in a world of scarcity. there isnt enough for everybody and those who can get it get it those who cant cant. its just the world we live in
I dont like people who want to tell others what to think, what to do, etc.
Quite often, they're social-misfits who have failed socially and economically anyway.
Why should I listen to you, why are you sucha shinning beacon of light worth listening to. If people want to share resources and shit, then Im fine with that.
But dont force me or any other grownup to share your way of life if we do not want to. I leave you to your communist communities and you leave me and everybody else to theirs. Peac
@Carnius797 When you say "always was under".....then "huge dick".....then 'haven't followed him much" only makes you...........(fill in the blanks as I can barely re-type these words.....). Just spread your panties to the side. PS: Are you mad at the gal who took Carnius796?
mate you studied about communism, I lived in communism. i know what its like first hand. you know about its philosophy and how "its" supposed to work. you go in Cuba, former USSR countries, Albania which experienced the most aggressive sort of communism, and ask people how life was at the time. it was horrid. starvation and a perpetual state of paranoia.
i wish that the communist philosophy could work so everyone gets a fair chance but fact is it dont.
@hekoka I never mentioned communism. once. Idk where you got that from. I said socialism, like norway. There, there are democratically elected leaders, people have equal rights, and the city is beautiful. Fuck communism. Thats outdated and useless. I'm talking socialist democracy. And if you think those are the same things you are very very misleaded.
@swassontelus no. Absolutely not sociocommudictatorship. Socialist Democracy. It has elements of socialism (everyone gets equal pay, single mothers get supported by the government, ect., people are taken care of no matter what their social status, healthcare to all) but the government desicions are made by the people. Representatives are elected democratically, and the people are put first.
That's why socialist democracies are among the happiest countries in the world (more than U.S.).
@nollkoll2 Yes there is no socialism there except for the socialist left party which is fourth largest party in norway. Oh ya and the Norweigian labor party which operates on a social market economy (basically a capitalist economy with government regulations. That is a combination of socialism and capitalism just in case you didn't know). It's not socialist except for the Prime Minister(President) who is a democratic socialist, and the labor party which is parliment majority.
@contractedwow are you kidding me. There are tons of arabs, black people, and non-whites in norway. It's not an Aryan state lmao. What a dumb thing to say.
This has been flagged as spam show
@Garpalt He does not have any communist tattoos, nor is he a communist. He is talking about Anarchism, and his tattoos are representative of that. These are two very different worldviews. Communism, often in theory and how it has been practiced, establishes the necessity for hierarchy. Anarchism seeks horizontal organization, and the establishment of directly democratic modes of political/economic organization.
penguinche11 1 month ago
Comment removed
penguinche11 1 month ago
Too bad this interview is happening in a noisy gym.
bagginshates 1 month ago
Read his blog. Monson gets a rude awakening after visiting a post-socialist Russian hospital. I wonder if he will now scrub off his communist tattoos.
Garpalt 2 months ago
I got a lot more respect for jeff after watching this video!
I didn't knew he was such an honest, humble men
maskevito 2 months ago
Bruce Willis
ridethehogie 2 months ago
The guy took too many punches because everyone knows that anarchy would never ever work. When there are no laws, courts, prison and all of that, it would take a week and you would end up in a world where only the survival of the fittest counts. A very sad world for the weaker, unarmed or unable to defend themselves. A world without rules would never work because it's not in the nature of man to respect eachother.
meningzegger 2 months ago
@meningzegger
Anarchism is based on an equal distribution of decision-making power, customary law, council courts, and so forth. So there are no "weaker" people in anarchy, as there is equal distribution of power.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets Sounds good in theory and in the books. Unforunately nature of man is different.
meningzegger 2 months ago 2
@meningzegger
No it doesn't. The EZLN has implemented a system based on equal distribution of power in the form of popular councils (participatory democracy) since 1994, so it does work.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets Basicly anarchists are idiots. Give me an example of an anarchistic society, or country ? And i'm not talking about communish because what you write is more like communism. A lawless society would never work but I guess for criminals it sounds tempting.
meningzegger 2 months ago
@meningzegger
In 1500 someone would ask "give me one example of a parliamentary democracy" you would not be able to give him one. Does this mean parl.democracy does not work? Obviously not. This is a fallacy called argument from ignorance.
Anarchism does not mean lawlessness. Anarchist and anarchic societies include Anarchist Ukraine (1918-1921), Anarchist Spain (1936), EZLN's Chiapas (1994-present). The former two were crushed by external force.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
Comment removed
meningzegger 2 months ago
@meningzegger
Wat een onzin. Ik heb precies gedaan waar jij om vroeg: werkende anarchistische samenleving tonen, en daarnaast heb ik je ontkracht dat anarchisten dom zijn, of dat anarchisme en recht niet bij elkaar passen. En dan in plaats van je op de argumenten te richten ga je onzin uitkramen?
Dat filmpje was een aankondiging van een anarchistische demonstratie voor vrijheid en tegen het rechtse gedoogkabinet.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets Op wat antwoord jij eigenlijk ? Beetje paranoide ofzo ? Kraam nog wat onzin uit niemand heeft er trouwens oor naar.
meningzegger 2 months ago
@meningzegger
" Op wat antwoord jij eigenlijk"
Jij vraagt of ik iets wil benoemen, dat doe ik, en in plaats van dat je daarop reageert ga je onzin uitkramen.
"Beetje paranoide ofzo"
Waarom zou ik?
"Kraam nog wat onzin uit niemand heeft er trouwens oor naar."
Ik ben niet degene die onzin uitkraamt.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets Jij hebt helemaal niets "ontkracht" behalve je eigen onzin. Ik ken waarschijnlijk meer zelfbenoemde anarchisten dan jij. Stuk voor stuk nietsnutten. Allemaal werkloos, lusteloos, met dreadlocks doch zo blank als een glas melk. Ze zijn voor een leven zonder wetten, waar alles mag en alles kan. Ze zijn tegen alle instellingen van de overheid behalve de instelling die hun uitkering of hun drugs betaalt. Losers, en nutteloos voor de maatschappij. Dat is de gemiddelde "anarchist".
meningzegger 2 months ago
@meningzegger
Pfff, ik wordt hier zo ontzettend moe van. Je gooit drogredenen achter elkaar. Ten eerste is je "argument" een argumentum ad hominem, je valt de personen aan en niet de theorie. Ten tweede is het onzin. De meerderheid van de anarchisten die ik ken werken gewoon. Ten derde herhaal ik me nog maar een keer: ANARCHIE BETEKEND NIET WETTELOOSHEID. Dus je hele argument is nergens op gebaseerd. In een anarchistische samenleving heb je gewoon wetten.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
@meningzegger
Maar laat ik het zo stellen.
Denk je dat participatie democratie kan werken? Indien ja. Mooi. Indien niet, de EZLN bewijst je vekeerd.
Denk je dat arbeiderszelfbestuur kan werken? Indien ja, mooi. Indien niet, de praktijk bewijst je vekeerd.
Anarchisme = arbeiderszelfbestuur + participatie democratie. Allebei is het een feit dat het werk, dus werkt anarchisme ook. Heel simpel.
En nu niet weer die onzin herhalen van "wetteloosheid".
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets Je latijn is blijkbaar beter dan je Nederlands want "betekent" is met een T gezien het geen voltooid deelwoord betreft. Maar goed, dit terzijde. Anarchisme wil simpelweg zeggen "ieder vorm van gezag of authoriteit afwijzen". Dat weet iedereen. Het is spijtig genoeg zo goed als onmogelijk om wetten op te leggen als er geen gezag of autoriteit is. Nogmaals, op zich vind ik dat een mooi idee, wie is er niet tegen autoriteit ? Zelfs het kleinste kind.
meningzegger 2 months ago
@meningzegger
Anarchisme is inderdaad tegen het opleggen van gezag, een moordernaar en verkrachter leggen autoriteit op, dus is het niet tegen anarchistische principes om dat te verbieden. Google "anarchisme en recht" en dan de wikipedia pagina.
En het "argument" dat mensen het niet willen is een drogreden, een argumentum ad populum.
Communisme is trouwens ook een staatsloze samenleving, maar dat terzijde.
En nee, mijn Nederlands is bar slecht omdat ik meer met engels te maken heb.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets Goed. Veel succes nog met uw mening verder.
meningzegger 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets Tenzij je zelf een autoritaire rol speelt, dan is het weer heel leuk, zo zitten de meeste mensen nu eenmaal in elkaar. Ik kan me trouwens geen anarchistische "leider" voorstellen die GEEN autoriteit zal uitoefenen. Heel dubbelzinnig. En ook al zijn er verschillende gematigde of minder gematigde strekkingen, lijkt het me zeer onwaarschijnlijk om een goed systeem in elkaar te steken.
meningzegger 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets Het enige wat ik daar nog wil op zeggen is dat anarchisme het dichtst bij wetteloosheid of straffeloosheid staat. En daar zijn de meeste mensen, begrijpelijk, gewoonweg tegen. Besluit : zonder autoriteit of gezag een maatschappij opbouwen, het klinkt mooi, maar het zal enkel werken in sprookjes want de mens zit nu eenmaal anders in elkaar. Communisme zit iets beter in elkaar maar we zien dat het ook niet alles is. Maar goed, ieder zijn overtuiging.
meningzegger 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets Trouwens voor mij mag dat wel, een wetteloze en straffeloze maatschappij waar alles mag en alles kan. Ik ben een stuk meer bewapend dan de gemiddelde persoon dus mij kan het niet bommen. Spijtig genoeg is niet iedereen in staat zichzelf te verweren. Het is je misschien nog niet opgevallen tussen je stompzinnige pseudo intellectuele zever dat er ook zwakkeren zijn in de maatschappij. En indien er een anarchistische samenleving zou zijn, staan die mensen nergens.
meningzegger 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets Anarchie zal altijd vervallen in de wet van de sterkste. En niet iedereen is dan in staat om gelijke kansen te krijgen. Zonder structuur, regering of wetten ga je terug naar de wet van de jungle. Dat is anarchie. Klinkt leuk voor zij die meestal uit eigenbelang dergelijke systemen mooipraten. Hun drugs zijn dan toegestaan. Ze worden dan niet meer gestraft om oudjes te beroven, of meer van dat fraais. Tja, voor dergelijke "mensen" klinkt anarchie inderdaad goed. Hun probleem.
meningzegger 2 months ago
@meningzegger
Je hebt anarchie in de zin van 'wetteloosheid', maar je hebt ook anarchie in de zin van de sociale en politieke theorie van het anarchisme. Dat gaat inderdaad over een samenleving zonder regering, maar zonder regering betekent zeker niet zonder structuur of zonder regels.
Trouwens grappig dat je anarchisten als nietsnutten met dreadlocks omschrijft in de commentaarsectie van een clip waar een hard-trainende, hardwerkende kale kerel over anarchisme praat.
MaeglinMiriel 2 months ago
Comment removed
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@meningzegger
And also, I would like to point out there are numerous anarchist academics. The most cited living scholar is an anarchist. And in Holland a Dutch anarchist (Thom Holterman) was an associate professor of law who wrote numerous books on anarchist forms of law codes.
My guess is, these anarchist scholars in general and Holterman in particular are not (all) idiots.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
Comment removed
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The man does have a point and at least seems educated. Just watching interview with Rampage Jackson what a thinks he hot shit creep?
BROWNIEMIX1 2 months ago
The man does have a point and at least seems educated. Just watching interveiw with Rampage Jackson what a thinks he hot shit creep?
BROWNIEMIX1 2 months ago
The problem with anarchy is that people don't get along without the threat of violence. If we all agreed, got along, and worked together then we wouldn't have most of our laws today. Not that I disagree with Jeff. I definitely agree in principle. But making it work is damn near impossible when every other asshole is trying to take what's yours.
crazyriders83 2 months ago
@crazyriders83
But anarchism still has customary law, so your argument is not correct.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets
ooo customary law in a nation full of immigrants. That's gonna work out well.
crazyriders83 2 months ago
Comment removed
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
Comment removed
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@crazyriders83
And that is somehow an argument? Customary law, presumably in addition with free contract, - i.e. autonomous law as opposed to heteronomous law -- would be sufficient in an anarchist society. I don't see how immigrants somehow make such source of law invalid.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fedor will tap like a bitch or quit on the stool.
JohnLawrenceCobraKai 2 months ago
im russian, but i don't want to see any of this 2 fighters lose
gazon671G 2 months ago
If Fedor wins this, Fedor can actually take a deep breath and RELAX!
againsturlaw 2 months ago
fedor will kick his ass
manfrom211 2 months ago
now its a reality , Monson will get Zulu'd
steverattlemma 2 months ago
Comment removed
JAtlantic2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if fedor loses, its game over for him
blade83336 3 months ago
i actually interested in what will happen, i know jeff is gonna prepare extra hard for this so i wanna c what happens, and stop saying he is old or out of is prime, he just lately not fighting very smart thats all, he didnt lose anything look at him from a fighter's prospective what did he lose?speed?power? no he didnt just not prepared, a good examples of fedor prepared are cro cop and nogueria fights.
arlovski, big foot,werdum, dan not so much look it up and compare
look it
AintDoneYet123 3 months ago
I must say that fedor before he lost his first fight,he didnt fought with ang big names apart Nogueira.My viev for fedor next fight is if fedor will not knock out Monson in 30/40 sek ,Monson gona take him dow and submit him.
hammerofthethor 3 months ago
@hammerofthethor Are u kidding me? Nogueira, Cro-cop, Silvia, Arlovski, an unbeaten Rogers... u dont know shit man!
Breheny86 3 months ago
Fedor is still the man, cannot wait for this fight!! LETS GO FEDOR!!!!!
TommyUTRA 3 months ago
Another set up this is why he's not in UFC, M1 would never let him fight top fighters. M1 turned Fedor into a powder puff.
iceman4180 3 months ago
@iceman4180 i think cuz they want 2 co-promote u know like strikeforce/m1 fedor vs rogers they want events where they get money for really not doing much, fedor manager is vadim who is the president of m1 so its kinda of a problem for fedor 2 fight in the ufc with him in charge
AintDoneYet123 3 months ago
Monson = Bane. Fedor = Batman (or the Fatman).
13Doses 3 months ago
Monson has no business being in the ring with a guy like Fedor. Monson trains down at our Acadame' but he is not at that level. Too much juice, no stamina, no striking....He is very strong and marketable. But he is NOT champion material.
BJJHomos 3 months ago
@BJJHomos and fedor is now....... fedor aint in the top 20 hw, travis brown could beat him
ChrisAtWar93 3 months ago
@ChrisAtWar93 Well Fedor is the best heavyweight of all time....But, yes he is older now and is not very competitive anymore. But Monson has never been a contender in Pride or UFC. He looks like he can kill everyone; but he does not have the tools or the skill set. He's very tough, but he's a career journeyman.
BJJHomos 3 months ago
@BJJHomos lol cain, dos santos, brock, overeem and countless other hw would ragedoll a prime fedor. and monson has some of the best grappling credentials in mma so i think he beats fedor
ChrisAtWar93 3 months ago
@ChrisAtWar93 None of those guys would "ragdoll" Fedor. Many bigger guys have tried. Monson will not ragdoll a 12 time world sambo champion. Fedor wins. By KO or Kimura.
TheReverendDB 3 months ago
@TheReverendDB big foot ragdolled fedor and he lost to Daniel Cormier, fedor aint tht good and never has been, henderson ko'ed him and hendo would get fucked by cain, santos, lesner and overeem and the "many bigger guys" werent top class at the time or ever really
ChrisAtWar93 3 months ago
@TheReverendDB wow just looked at ur channel, ur clearly a fan boi so ur basically blind about mma
ChrisAtWar93 3 months ago
@ChrisAtWar93 Fanboy of REAL MMA fighters maybe bud. I make tributes for fighters who have done something to represent the sport and what it's about just so happens Fedor is the only true real martial artist in MMA. To his core its what he is. Honor, respect, valor, and integrity. The man has never bashed another fighter (except with his fists) for any reason. Every other fighter has at some point or another. FACT. Fighters who give the sport a good name deserve respect. Fedor = Dangerous -Hendo
TheReverendDB 3 months ago
@TheReverendDB fedor got beat by a 185'er how can u say his the bes
ChrisAtWar93 3 months ago
@ChrisAtWar93 205.... But that's not the point. Did you even read that? the SPORT isn't about winning and losing, it's about Honor and Respect. Fedor embodies what the sport is really about, Zuffa and Dana White have made it into a business where legends of the sport who have helped push it to where it is don't get recognized or are swept under the rug. He is the greatest of all time Martial Artist. Because he's one of the few who's still a REAL martial artist and not a Zuffa Zombie fighter...
TheReverendDB 3 months ago
@TheReverendDB back track o what u first said, and u dont know him, or anyone in mma most likely so y romantisize him, what has he done for the sport, he wouldnt fight the best in the world and prove his the best, and then when forced to fight rank guys he looses
ChrisAtWar93 3 months ago
@ChrisAtWar93 I know a lot of the MMA fighters bud. I'm an amateur fighter myself and MMA analyst/journalist. He's done plenty for the sport like shown that a man can be a fighter and a person. They're too often represented by fighters today as THUGS and big mouthed bums. He has beaten the best, of his time. Nog, Cro Cop, Herring, Coleman, Sylvia, Arlovski. Guys who all at one time were considered "The best in the world" at one thing or another. And he beat them. Best of his age. No arguing it.
TheReverendDB 3 months ago
@TheReverendDB funny how he went from being grreatest of all time, to greatest of his time. anyway ur clearly a blind fanboi hating on the ufc. back to the start fedor would be killed by the top 5 heavyweights and i dont care if his a good person or not, just saying he aint tht good anymore and i dont think he was eve tht god
ChrisAtWar93 3 months ago
@ChrisAtWar93 greatest of all time in tactfulness and respect. Greatest of his time in skill. Not a blind fan boy. History shows us that the only thing people love more than watching a hero succeed is watching them fail. Who do you think is the best MMA fighter right now?
TheReverendDB 3 months ago
@TheReverendDB haha i dont really wanna argue anymore getting kinda pointless, good luck with ur mma career
ChrisAtWar93 3 months ago
Comment removed
ChrisAtWar93 3 months ago
06.11.2007 ))) 4 years + 6 days you will FIGHT!!!!
videohost199 3 months ago 2
20 november moscow 2011 fixed
MrJohnnyClass 3 months ago
All the sudden laughter in the background, when they mentioned Monson and Fedor. lol. This is the same guy who can't beat Tim Sylvia, and possibly Cornbread (Kimbo) Slice.
ImSmarterThanYuo 3 months ago
I know what your saying but I think the the definition of anarchy is absence of government and laws. Communism requires central control of almost every aspect of social and economics - right? Then like everything on the left, its a misnomer. I know there are many people trying to take down capitalism and replace it with communism, but if you think about it - how are goods and services going to reach market? This especially if you consider a transition period it takes to make the change.
Zresponder 3 months ago
@Zresponder
No, communism is stateless. There is also no market in communism.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
Is he a communist? Most anarchists are really communists?
Zresponder 4 months ago
@Zresponder Communists believe that there must be a phase of preparation beetwen capitalism and COmmunism...that phase is called Socialism... Anarchist say that phase dont need to exist... Communists say that the work of everyone should be shared by the whole societyu... Anarchist may work for himselfs without sharing nothing... I think that is the main differences... Im still studyng Anarchy... But i know COmmunism is wwhat i sayd to u
NewBornpt 3 months ago
@Zresponder But yes, some are Anarco-Communists
NewBornpt 3 months ago
hard to write it but i think its all over for fedor :(
SamcoPowa 4 months ago
@SamcoPowa its not over hes gonna continue fighting if not in big org than in smalls ones everywhere but hes not that washed up so he'll come back after beating monson, the only reason people think he'll lose this fight is cuz hes in a loosing streak and they dont really look at the fighters and at there skills 2 compare and assume who wins they just look at fedor record
AintDoneYet123 4 months ago
@AintDoneYet123 i hope u have right with that comeback :)
SamcoPowa 4 months ago
@SamcoPowa i cant know anything for sure but thats what probably will happen
AintDoneYet123 4 months ago
Snowman Monson will dominate fedor.
mercilessMarksmen 4 months ago
i hope fedor win the fight at 12 november.......
DX777900 4 months ago 15
@DX777900
Monson will fight Fedor at 12.11.2011?
Rad0lanko 3 months ago
@DX777900 The 20th my friend. Can't wait!
37MKE 3 months ago
Fedor might fight monson on 12h of november.
jaimeexd 4 months ago
just are retarded as conservative Christians? When you try to put someone down...try to make sure your spelling is correct...idiot
ProdigalChild1 6 months ago
anarchist are just are retarded as conservative christians.
Hemouth 6 months ago
@Hemouth im are conservative christians
Normansmight 6 months ago
Jeff fights for Freedom (A)
Mushqualunque 6 months ago 16
@Mushqualunque so does feDor but he makes good money and a legacy
calbo555 5 months ago
which is a combination of socialist and capitalist economic ideologies if you didn't already know that. And Norway does in fact have a mixed economy, so there is a combination of free market and gov owned industry (socialist ideology fyi). So yes Scandinavia is not pure socialist, but if you read my comments I never said they were. They do, however have elements of socialism in their government looping me back to my original statement "Democratic socialism".
thank you.
BootyBot 7 months ago
As long as you work and earn your piece, then and only then do you deserve a say to stake your claim in this world.
macbier6913 7 months ago
jeffs gotta get really famous in this shit, if you think about it hes part of the system, if he gets a lot of money doing this from advertsising then he should use some money to help awake and educate ppl. he could infulence alot of ppl just becuase of who he is. WE NEED MORE MONSONS.
doomedhuman420 7 months ago
i am a german anarchist...and we alll do( in my antifascist group) thai or kickboxing...
when som fascist are on da street i kick dem in da face
AntifaDeg 7 months ago
buy a mic
wohs145 7 months ago
FUCK EMILIANENKO...FEDOR SUCKS...ALL RUSSIAN ARE QUEER CZARS
takenbythesword 7 months ago
@takenbythesword ahah good to talk thru internet bitch
jtebaize 7 months ago
@takenbythesword cool story bro
ScavengerData 5 months ago
@takenbythesword Have you noticed our government lately?
Zresponder 3 months ago
This guy is a truelly wobbly, same path of a lot of hard blue collar working class men and women. Its is always pleasant to watch and listen to a well educated sportsman not only reproducing ideology of supremacy - like a Nike's advertising - but someone who really cares about living in a wealthy and decent society. S y RS Jeff Monson.
brunomaxyq 7 months ago
To many selfish , ignorants, non-educated, and very poor informed people in the comments it makes me angry.
1024joaquin 8 months ago
Every man for himself. survival of the fittest. eat what you kill. thats what i believe in. everyone mind their own business. for those who wanna help others, thats there business.
ClearwaterMMA 8 months ago
@ClearwaterMMA Too bad humans have never lived that way. We're social animals, and that's what has allowed us to make it to the top. Social Darwinism yearns for a past that never was. Naive tools for the rich.
Hatchyack 5 months ago
@ClearwaterMMA
You sound like a misguided idiot.
GodOfTheInternets 2 months ago
@GodOfTheInternets why because he doesn't want other people to be able to tell him what to do? that is true Anarchism, Individual Anarchy, what you describe is other people having a vote, and a say over what others do, a tyranny of the majority, which is against personal liberty, and true Anarchism, you leftist fucks try to subvert the definition of Anarchy, just like you try to rewrite history, anyone that has a thinking mind, sees through your lies, that you want to control other people
LuckyTHlRT33N 2 months ago
too much trolling -__-
fatguyanthony 9 months ago
and they've thrown away whats bad about both worlds. The greed of pure capitalism which indirectly controls the people (lobbiests, ad campaigns ect.), and the ineffectiveness of the socialist power structure. So they have regulated businessmen which keeps them from becoming greedy bitches AND they have democratically elected leaders to keep them from becoming power hungry mad men.
BootyBot 9 months ago
@SesyiBilliio85 OMG ME
ClearDream 9 months ago
great comrade
dpapaioannow 10 months ago
>>>
Capitalism got an production model which based on surplus value, instead of total social needs. With neo-liberal politics after cold war, class contradictions became much more appear. Each day, people who live in countries which exploited by imperalism as a cheaper labor die because of malnutrition and preventable diseases. And in that bloody system which only works for bourgeois, people who curse Cuba despite all the rates i just gave, are disingenuous to me.
Atalay 11 months ago
I'm a libertarian socialist, and there are many things i criticise about Cuba. But people are really brainwashed about Cuba, thanks to USA's propaganda. Actually, according to UNESCO Cuba has the lowest illiteracy rate and the highest matriculation rate of all the countries in Latin America. Life expectancy is 76.5% in Cuba while in Latin America it is 70 years. Cuba has the highest percentage of doctors per person in the world. Only country where there are %0 malnutrition etc.
>>>>
Atalay 11 months ago
we just ned to get rid of obama 1 ore year bsides i live in america and all of are men are being made into pussies we need to be real men again working on cars chopping wood fighting playing outside in the drit insted of living in our room playing fucking halo or world of warcraft
bob2012isfake 11 months ago
This guy Jeff Monson surprised me very much, he is a very smart guy.
he is correct about things, i also don't consider it to be ethical & right for 10% of the population to hold 80% of the entire nations wealth.
Unfortunately most people are not as smart as Monson and don't understand they are slaves of the elite rich minority!
Patambo2000 11 months ago 2
Anyone who thinks communism is anything close to anarchism definitely rode the short bus. Do your homework
whisplee 11 months ago
@whisplee Anarchist communism (also known as anarcho-communism and occasionally as free communism) is a theory of anarchism which advocates the abolition of the state, private property, and capitalism in favor of common ownership of the means of production, direct democracy and a horizontal network of voluntary associations and workers' councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle: "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need".
MrSteveParr 11 months ago
@MrSteveParr The first problem comes in defining "ability" and "need" and assigning values of each to the individual. It would become a game where people would try to prove they had very little ability and very great need. Not to sound too Ayn Rand-ian, but I can't see that I would be particularly motivated in that system. Also, those who decide who is able and who is needy would be the corruptible power brokers.
rrpostalagain 7 months ago
@rrpostalagain Then you have the whole forced labor issue. The only way to ensure that the honest people that do work keep working is to make them work or to make the dregs work also. The community would find a way to motivate you or they would banish you. Being close knit and protective as any community would have to be in order to place ones survival directly in the hands of ones neighbor, strangers won’t be trusted. To be banished could prove to be a death sentence.
MrSteveParr 7 months ago
@rrpostalagain Large cities would erupt into chaos and be completely destroyed in a month. Once all the 18 wheelers stop running because the is no currency to buy oil to make diesel to put in the pumps there will be nothing to eat in the grocery store. Image millions dead, lying on the streets and highways radiating outward 100 miles in all directions form L.A., Atlanta, N.Y., Chicago, ect, ect. Maybe 200 million dead nation wide. Mostly starved or murdered for a can of corn.
MrSteveParr 7 months ago
@MrSteveParr fuck man. you need a crash course in autonomy and social observations. this laughable scenario is wrong on so many levels. no clue
Lycanthrobby 7 months ago
@whisplee Do your homework
MrSteveParr 11 months ago
I would like to see Jeff Monson fight in the UFC again!
29trustme 1 year ago
up the IWW !!
LouiseMichelFanClub 1 year ago
@LexPhilogus
Yeah. I told the dude, "Wis, what? Wisconsin? You mean West Kansas. WTF are you talking about?"
Ham sandwich flew, slapped out of my hand. Meat, cheese, bread, flying. My face was slapped red. I got throttled.
I was like "chill out dude. What's up with that?" Everyone was quiet looking at the situation. People were like, "Chill man. Where you from?"
He was like "Wisconsin. Are you crazy or something? Smart ass!"
I was like, "Dude, man be cool...it's cool bra, chill."
JoeJacari 1 year ago
Comment removed
JoeJacari 1 year ago
I think he might have mentioned the IWW briefly in there. I was curious as to whether or not there is a union representing prize fighters. I think it certainly would be a good idea.
poleske 1 year ago
That's the way the corporations want it. A few rich (1%) of individuals owning the majority of the wealth, while the rest of the 99% compete for the scraps that are left.
Andrew32488 1 year ago
I think Fedor would take munson (agree or disagree)
ribbs06 1 year ago
Fedor Emelianenko is sa national-patriot not anarchist.
14SlavsUnited88 1 year ago
@14SlavsUnited88 иди в жопу сука он не националист
bushidoartss 1 year ago
@bushidoartss соси член придурок ))) ты не хуя не знаешь и не пизди
14SlavsUnited88 1 year ago
@14SlavsUnited88 пидараст и федор и брат выложили видео что они не националисты и что они не навидят этих пидарастов нацистов... нацисты на столько чмошные что хотя переписать себе всех пошел вон а то наду шакал башку тебе оторву пидараст
bushidoartss 1 year ago 2
I always thought Wisconsin was West Kansas.
I said, "hey, where you from?" Dude says, "Wisconsin."
I said, "you mean West Kansas. There's no such thing as Wis...whatever."
Of course I got my face slapped and my ham sandwich flew across the room.
I'm so confused...really, really lost about what's up...
JoeJacari 1 year ago
@JoeJacari "I always thought Wisconsin was West Kansas"
Please tell me that's a joke?
LexPhilogus 1 year ago
Much respect to Jeff. Thanks for uploading.
AnarchyRightNow 1 year ago
FUCK all systems ever existed on this planet! We want the world and we want it now!
Jimlead 1 year ago
a democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on dinner,a constitutional republic has the same dinner guests,but the sheep has a gun!
justaman6972 1 year ago 2
@justaman6972
HEAR HEAR!
MrSteveParr 11 months ago
CAPITALISIM SUCKS!
mquirk00 1 year ago
@mquirk00 capitalism sucks communism sucks has any form of government ever worked?
loserluver100 1 year ago
@loserluver100 YES! Barbarianism.Thats why all nations either rise and fall,or rise,and are conquerd by their oppressed. Rome was conquerd by lesser status ,bullied around, barbaric Visigoth and Celtic tribes who were oppressed by the romans. If there was more diplomatic civility in Rome's (democracy) leadership Rome may have never been attacked and burnt to the ground. But it only took a few assholes with a power trip to piss off the barbarians. The goths and celts were tribal, no government.
mquirk00 1 year ago
@mquirk00 That isn't the only, or even the main reason rome fell. Rome started out very disciplined, devoted to their cause. They lived simple lives and were very militaristic. After their success the majority of the populace drifted toward indulging in the excesses that came with their success. They lost the discipline and devotion to their country and gave in to satisfying their personal greedy needs. Later, when the empire came under attack, their legionaires were rusty.
hzuiel 1 year ago
Right on Jeff!
vootman 1 year ago
Anarchism isn't punk rock and it isn't Socialism.
Look into it a bit and I think you'll be surprised.
LeedansParis 1 year ago
@LeedansParis Actually, it is a type of socialism, in the sense of natural resources and the means of production being socialized. "Anarcho-capitalism" would better be named anachro-capitalism.
Hatchyack 5 months ago
@Hatchyack Thanks Hatch. I agree that anarcho is better in lower case because it isn't a title. However, while I think anyone is free to form whatever type of community they choose, including socialist, shared resource based communities, I find it doesn't support individualism and freedom to the extent a purely anarcho-capitalism would.
LeedansParis 5 months ago
Jeff SUCK
Panther704 1 year ago
AKpress(dot)org
the anarchist FAQ on infoshop(dot)org, based on hundreds of historical anarchist texts.
bjarczyk 1 year ago
Although he has.........questionable political beliefs, he seems like a pretty cool dude.
ThewasupmanHO 1 year ago
what he is referring to sound more like communism which is on the exact opposite end of the spectrum
murisonfamily 1 year ago
@murisonfamily Actually Communism is the logical extreme of Anarchism. Lenin-Marxism like the Soviets was not Communist, it was a top-down form of Socialism supposively trying to create Communism.
In Communism there can be no rulers, since everyone is considered equal and no one is given special privilege in society. No kings, no congress, no corporations, no slaves, no scapegoats, no war and no homeless, that is Communism.
BaboonJihad 1 year ago
@BaboonJihad
You are %100 right.
Atalay 11 months ago
@Atalay why don't you state he is right if he talks about social-anarchism, where people can have a vote or say to control other people, a tyranny of the majority, mob rule, which is totally against what anarchism should be. Individual Anarchism is true liberty, no man has a say over another man, you cannot tell me what to do, that is true anarchy. You leftist fucks keep Communism and Socialism, and stop trying to claim you are anarchists, when you want to control others.
LuckyTHlRT33N 2 months ago
first off monson is a badass. im all for everybody being able to have decent living conditions with education, medical, food, etc but unfortunately there will always be competition for it because as much as some people refuse to admit we live in a world of scarcity. there isnt enough for everybody and those who can get it get it those who cant cant. its just the world we live in
southernbornbadass 1 year ago
I dont like people who want to tell others what to think, what to do, etc.
Quite often, they're social-misfits who have failed socially and economically anyway.
Why should I listen to you, why are you sucha shinning beacon of light worth listening to. If people want to share resources and shit, then Im fine with that.
But dont force me or any other grownup to share your way of life if we do not want to. I leave you to your communist communities and you leave me and everybody else to theirs. Peac
MrHerrIQ 1 year ago
wow hes an intelligent dude, its crazy tat only a few have alll the money and power
slevels1 1 year ago
Wow great interview. Always was under the impression this dude was a huge dick. Haven't followed him much,
Carnius797 1 year ago
@Carnius797 When you say "always was under".....then "huge dick".....then 'haven't followed him much" only makes you...........(fill in the blanks as I can barely re-type these words.....). Just spread your panties to the side. PS: Are you mad at the gal who took Carnius796?
swassontelus 1 year ago
@swassontelus Only a gay dude would make something gay out of that. Lmfao, thanks for the laugh, you fucking homo.
Carnius797 1 year ago
I never knew this about Jeff before, he's a great man.
SturmWolfe 1 year ago
mate you studied about communism, I lived in communism. i know what its like first hand. you know about its philosophy and how "its" supposed to work. you go in Cuba, former USSR countries, Albania which experienced the most aggressive sort of communism, and ask people how life was at the time. it was horrid. starvation and a perpetual state of paranoia.
i wish that the communist philosophy could work so everyone gets a fair chance but fact is it dont.
hekoka 1 year ago 15
@hekoka
"perpetual state of paranoia."
Sounds kind of like capitalism too!
SturmWolfe 1 year ago
@hekoka I never mentioned communism. once. Idk where you got that from. I said socialism, like norway. There, there are democratically elected leaders, people have equal rights, and the city is beautiful. Fuck communism. Thats outdated and useless. I'm talking socialist democracy. And if you think those are the same things you are very very misleaded.
BootyBot 1 year ago 31
@BootyBot that is an entirely different philosophy. what monson talks about doesnt even exist in "paradise" lol
hekoka 1 year ago
@BootyBot Please....don't tell us what you think we should think. On the other hand.....as a SocioDemoCommuDictatorship......tell me again?
swassontelus 1 year ago
@swassontelus no. Absolutely not sociocommudictatorship. Socialist Democracy. It has elements of socialism (everyone gets equal pay, single mothers get supported by the government, ect., people are taken care of no matter what their social status, healthcare to all) but the government desicions are made by the people. Representatives are elected democratically, and the people are put first.
That's why socialist democracies are among the happiest countries in the world (more than U.S.).
BootyBot 1 year ago
@BootyBot I also love the city of Norway
swassontelus 1 year ago
@BootyBot jajajajaja, socialism in norway
pahenyn 1 year ago
@BootyBot hhahahahahaa, socialism in norway hahhahhah
pahenyn 1 year ago
@BootyBot There is no socialism in norway.
nollkoll2 1 year ago
@nollkoll2 Yes there is no socialism there except for the socialist left party which is fourth largest party in norway. Oh ya and the Norweigian labor party which operates on a social market economy (basically a capitalist economy with government regulations. That is a combination of socialism and capitalism just in case you didn't know). It's not socialist except for the Prime Minister(President) who is a democratic socialist, and the labor party which is parliment majority.
BootyBot 1 year ago
@nollkoll2 so ya i guess besides for all those things there is no socialism in norway.
BootyBot 1 year ago
@BootyBot I wish i could thumbs up this more.
jacksundaniel 1 year ago
@BootyBot
It only works with Whites. You introduce niggers or any non-Whites and it will fail. Prove me wrong.
contractedwow 1 year ago
@contractedwow are you kidding me. There are tons of arabs, black people, and non-whites in norway. It's not an Aryan state lmao. What a dumb thing to say.
BootyBot 1 year ago