Added: 2 years ago
From: ramin12345g
Views: 21,770
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (187)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow. Some very ill informed arguments here. From both sides.

    Unfortunately, despite this being about someone who is most likely facing a death sentence for acting in a film, I laughed whilst reading these posts. Which is sad. Largely because this should be about PROTECTING THE LADY ABOVE (remember?!) and NOT a hub for self righteous homophobes and homosexuals alike. Tbh, some of the claims from both sides are still making me laugh.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Dogsneedpleasuretoo it obviously would as there are these homosexual freaks that demand for it, the same would go for any group of alternative lifestyles- No, I said that the redefinition of marriage would lose its valuable meaning if it is change to alternatives like homosexuality, polyamory or zoophilia.

  • @NatDemUK BHow valuable is marriage when men murder their wives 'cause they was freedom?, Molest their children? Stop being a delusional hypocrite. You sicken me.

  • @rachelsOne Errr stupid, is that what marriage glorifies? Men killing women? No! You vile creep, you obviously want men and women to stop living together and raise children by your vile standards.

  • @NatDemUK Gee YOU tell me if that's what marriage glorifies, when you turn on the news and you see people like Scott Peterson, Drew Peterson (who has murdered virtually all of his wives) and the child molesters who are married. Not to mention the serial killers who lead quiet lives at home and murder women in their spare time. Err stupid? A Vile Creep? Yes You are.

  • @rachelsOne You are obviously a vile creep yourself you feminist dyke! You have a vile hatred towards straight men and think that they are all murderers, you sick creep. Men like Drew Peterson will have the great advantage to have the death penalty as that would send a shock to any other attempted murderer towards women. You think that marriage is about men killing women? Ugh, you really are messed up with all that liberal Marxist bullshit!

  • @NatDemUK What's wrong with being a feminist?

    Should I be a "masculinist"? Do u realize how stupid your comment looks? I have a Master's degree. I am far more educated than you are, and I am NOT ashamed of who I am. As far as being a "Dyke" am I supposed to feel bad b/c U refer to me as a Dyke? I don't think so. Spend ur tiime worrying about the fact that women who are rejecting you and not me.

  • @NatDemUK I don't care if men and women live together to raise children, However you DO care if two women live together to raise children, even though they will be better off.

  • @rachelsOne No, of course not, you would rather that it be one parent or more than one person of the same gender in order to deprive the child from having a mother and a father figure but just have two of the same gender instead. You vile creep! A child needs the two opposite genders to reflect to him/ her the basis of society and the values between the two genders. Let us allow two incestuous siblings to adopt a child for the sake of them not having their own together because of birth defects.

  • @NatDemUK A child needs two parents that LOVE and Nuture its growth. U were raised by n2 parents? If so Y r u so fucked up? If not then your insanity must be hereditary and being RAISED BY 2 PARENTS WOULDN\'T HAVE HELPED.

  • @rachelsOne So two parents, not three or more? Then in that case, one mother and one father as well to love it, not a group of degenerate freaks. I am not motivated by any form of insanity, bitch, I just get easily furious with stupid twats like yourself. What is wrong with being a feminist? What is right about it? It is this stupid worldview that men are oppressive and that both genders are exactly the same, pure crap!

  • @NatDemUK "So two parents, not three or more?"

    Learn to read and respond to questions correctly. I asked if were you raised by 2 parents.

    I am not repeating myself again. Learn to read English and respond to others questions correctly. No one here has time to waste on you.

  • @rachelsOne You stupid bitch, you were talking about adoption and you were saying that a child needs two parents, well yes two of the opposite gender as well moron. I am not uneducated, it is just that I am not brainwashed by political correctness like freaks such as yourself. You are far more of a waste of time yourself.

  • @NatDemUK Kiss my ass, you're so stupid you have no idea what I mwas writing about. I'm getting 2 u AREN'T i? Want to fuck me 2 teach me a lesson don't you? Problem is you lack the intelligence to teach anything above a gutter snipe.

    READ THE FUCKING QUESTION AND ANSWER IT: WERE YOU RAISED BY TWO GODDAMN PARFENTS? YOU RETARDED MOTHERFUCKER.

  • @rachelsOne SHUT YOUR FUCKING FACE BITCH!!! You have no fucking intelligence yourself fucked up dyke! No, I was not raised by two parents only one and that is why single parenting has to stop NOW!!!!!! I lack no intelligence, it is just hard to get my message across when it comes to feminist freaks like yourself. I am not an ignorant prick, you are an ignorant slut yourself bitch! You are a waste of breath and do us all a favour an commit suicide.

  • @NatDemUK Blow Me you impotent sackless dick. U can't do shit to me, go whack off imagining how you'd fuck my brains out if only u weren't afraid of vaginas. U will not answer if U were raised by two parents.

    I WAS raised by two parents which is why I am san and you are not. I told u 2 kill urself 1st, stop copying my ideas. Sheesh what a waste of a human life you are. Copy that now you dumb ass son of a cunt. Oh yeah ur mum likes the "lick". LMAO.

  • @NatDemUK Oops my bad! So U were not raised by 2 parents. That explain ur anger but that's not the problem...the prooblem is your fear of abandonment and your sense of worthlessness and your lack of "self".

    2 parents cannot change that just because 1 is male. Why don't you understand that? Ur hatred towards the parent who raised u in not cmitagted by forcing others to be in an abusive relationship against their will. U have issues, U need some intense counseling.

  • @rachelsOne No, I am a calm person and I never get in trouble and I have never been a rebellious teenager unlike you were towards your dad morelike because you are a feminist. Quite frankly I have had enough with all your bullshit crap of course and yes, that is why a child needs two parents of the opposite gender rather than have one given that he or she will go dysfunctional as it normally happens these days, but hang on you are feminist scum who has allowed single parenting to thrive anyway.

  • @NatDemUK Have you read your comments? U shouldread them if you haven't. How the fuck r you calm when you are calling me: FUCKING DYKE! A BITCH AND A COW? Don't try to pretend that you got your shit together now after all of your ranting and raving. NO a child DOESN'T need two parents of opposite sexes, not if they are dysfunctional like you are. I know people raised by 1 parent who are heterosexual & they still aren't crazy like U w/ ur bullshit.

  • @rachelsOne BECAUSE you started this you FUCKING BITCH YOURSELF!!! You stupid COW YOU SAID THAT A CHILD NEEDS TWO PARENTS TO BE RAISED FROM!!! YES a child DOES NEED a mother and a father- those two are the bedrock of society FREAK!!!! I CARE NOT if I do not know you because you are piece of vile shit whom I would rather see dead. I am not crazy and I have no idea from whence you get all that crap! GET A LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @NatDemUK I also know people raised by heterosexual parents who are just as fucked up as u. Serial killer Jeffery Dahmer for one the Green River Killer for another. Look at how you attacked me and your venemous hatred just because no woman wants you. U are 1 step away from being a rapist and seial killer urself.

    I'm done w/ U. U'll receive No more responses from me.

  • @rachelsOne BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH!!! Having homosexuals would make them completely fucked up with such a disgusting abnormality being promoted and given that many pedophiles are homosexuals themselves . You are so fucked in your head, we all know that you want to be a serial killer yourself, get help you really need it FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAA­AKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @NatDemUK Only Children write: "Blah Blah Blah" GROW THE FYCK UP U WORTHLESS FATHERLESS LITTLE BASTARD, NO WONDER DADDY RAN AWAY.

  • @rachelsOne GROW The Fuck up yourself you HATEFUL DYKE YOU JUST HAVE A HATRED TO MEN THAT IS ALL, NOTHING ELSE!

  • @NatDemUK Don't hate me because your mother is a whore and your father didn't stick around, I had nothing to do with that.

    If I were him I'd leave you also. That has NOTHING to do with me hating men, but EVERYTHING to do with you being a terrible stupid and hateful monster. No wonder your angry. I'd be angry also if NO ONE loved me, like NO ONE loves you.

  • @NatDemUK Go ahead, have the last word. I wonder what intelligent comment u will post? Will it be: "Blah Blah Blah" OR "You Hate Men" ? You're a freaking uneducated, mentally unbalanced moron and a joke to all of humanity.

    You certainly make it easy for lesbians to hate males, however I pity your retarded ass.

  • @rachelsOne You are a loser and a pathetic sadistic slut who makes no logic in your statements, you attacked me ad hominem first, now get fucking bent!

  • @NatDemUK Shut nthe fuck up, go find your father and stop wasting time blaming lesbians for the fact that your daddy abandoned you and your mommy. That's what men do, Go ask her where your daddy is.

  • @NatDemUK I attacked U first? Ooh Poor Baby, like I give a fuck. Grow the fuck up. I'm sure it didn't hurt as much as beiong abandoned.

  • @rachelsOne You are more of a baby, you are perhaps nothing but a crack addicted freak. Seriously get a life!

  • @NatDemUK Oh Boo Hoo I'm a baby and a crack addicted freak. LMAO Grow Up. U keep writing the SAME insults over and over. What's wrong aren't you intelligent enough to come up with something new and insightful? U know what I mean, like how I pinpointed your anger at the fact that U don't have a loving relationship w/ ur father so you blame lesbians for your abandonment. Is ur mommy a lesbian?

  • @rachelsOne You do not even know who I am bitch, so fuck off and mind your own business. You have done nothing but spout insults because you are plain boring. You do nothing but spout the same insults over the time every now and again. I bet you snog your mum you little incestuous dyke. All you can do is insult me by saying I cannot have a loving relationship? You are pathetic, you know nothing about me so get a life!

  • @NatDemUK I know exactly who you are. That's why my comments are so upsetting to you. I have you trained like the dog that you are.

    You feel abandoned and hopeless, U think that taking out ur anger on lesbians will make u happy. But u see it doesn't. Oh and please spare me the Mom Snogging insults. I snog ur mum, not mine LMAO.

    Yeah Im a dyke you've already made that clear a million times. Gosh you are no fun. NOTHING new. I guess I can't expect much from some one as stupid as U R ek?

  • @NatDemUK With a comment like that, you show lack of intelligence. It's a nice way to show off ignorance, though. Good job.

  • @RoboticShakedown Thanks to ME. NatDem has been silenced now that he/she realizes that Lesbians aren't responsible for his father not being around. I took care of that nitwit in my earlier posts. I don't appreciate the cowards are coming out of the woodwork now. Where were any of you when he was attacking me mercilessly? NOWHERE. So much 4 sisterhood. Good thing I can take care of myself.

  • @rachelsOne I only discovered these comments this afternoon. I don't know why you're attacking me.

  • @RoboticShakedown Look DON'T Give me the standard: "I just discovered it" line. I TOOK care of this dumbass ALONE and I DON'T need you whining: "Why are you attacking me?" Honey read the comments I received and STFU.

  • @rachelsOne Now you're just being ridiculously presumptuous. I would hardly call it whining. I was asking a simple question because I didn't do anything wrong. I never heard of Kiana until a couple weeks ago through a Facebook group. I didn't watch the trailer until today, after watching it I just happened to see the comments this afternoon. Nothing more, nothing less.

  • @RoboticShakedown Goddamn it see what you did? Everything was fine but you have to start and now that fucktard is back and what are you doing? Arguing with me instead of focusing on that fatherless weasel. Get out of my face and do something useful. Don't send me another fucking response. Jesus Christ, you DO know that all lesbians are not meant to be friends don't you?

  • @rachelsOne You started this yourself. You attacked me when I did nothing wrong. And I never asked to be your friend either, I have enough lesbians in my life. You're tired of my responses because they're the only ones with any bit of intelligence aimed towards you.

  • @RoboticShakedown Fucking Grow up. It's obvious that I AM the more intelligent one in this traid. Why? Because I'm NOT cryingh: U started it

    I NOT gonna let lesbians be disrespected dullards like natdu or you.

    R U retarded or something? I'm tired of your responses b/c they not salient to the issue. Ur not writing N E Thing about NatdemUK's invividious tactice.

    Y? B/C U don't even know what that is. Not only am I older than U, I'm more educated than U.

    How's that for intelligence?

  • @rachelsOne Right, because intelligent people type like a ten year old with Down Syndrome. I don't disrespect lesbians, otherwise I wouldn't get all the attention I normally have from them. :)

    Anyway, I'm just going to end this. You're too insane to deal with. Nothing you say is rational. I haven't been whining or crying, simply stating observations. NatDemUK is obviously an idiot. I'm done with this thread.

  • @RoboticShakedown Please U can't respond to Natdem's use of invidious comparison b/c U don't know what it is and U have the audacity to refer 2 me as a 10 yr. old? What 10 yr. old that u know uses that term? Ur annoying U need to get the fuck out this thread with ur nonsense. I didn't want to write it but stop acting like a stupid bitch.

  • @rachelsOne You're being presumptuous again, to think I wouldn't know simple terms. I'm sorry you had to deal with that idiot with his straw hat arguments along with his circular arguments. I know how frustrating it can be.

    And I wasn't saying your vocabulary or sentence structure resembles a 10 year old, you don't know then I won't press the issue any further and let you continue on.

  • @RoboticShakedown Tell me how the term "invidious comparison" is simple?

    You can't even reply 2 my comments correctly to know what I'm referring to. U are trying to challenge me with what is at best a Freshman collegiate argument and you aren't even getting that correct b/c it's a "Straw Man" argument NOT "Straw Hat" Don't fuck with me.

    I have a Master's Degree from University and all you have is your head shoved deeply up your ass.

  • @rachelsOne Aha, oops. I forgot that one. Anyway, you're right. It's not simple. I just got mad that you continued to be presumptuous. You don't know who I am. And I still haven't said anything wrong except when I mistook straw hat for straw man in a moment's lapse. Cool master degree, bro.

  • @RoboticShakedown U don't disrespect lesbians but u don't defend them either. In addition U can't even read my comments correctly so I don't know why U keep responding.

    On U Tube anytime pple can't articulately respond tro a comment the other person has to be insane. Rather than U just being a dumbass. U shouldn't challenge an adult, U obviously don't have what it takes to be effective.

  • @rachelsOne I never called you retarded or slow or a dumbass because that would be juvenile. Anyway, sorry for getting you riled up with my rational comments. And for everything you've said to me from last night and today... Cool story, bro. Swing by my page sometime. :)

  • @RoboticShakedown "Cool story, bro. Swing by my page sometime. :) "

    I'm a woman, hardley a bro. Get ONE thing write for Goodness Sakes. Oh and as far as the dumb as comment. well I call em like I see em.

    Just being honest "bro".

  • Comment removed

  • @RoboticShakedown This is what's "Rational": Me asking you how the term "Invidious Comparison" is simple like you claim and you refusing to answer the quariojn. That's a fairly "Juvenile" thing to do wouldn't U agree?

  • Comment removed

  • @rachelsOne And I'm probably thinking of a different word but I'm pretty sure invidious comparisons are meant to give offense with prejudices or something like that. I remember reading it somewhere when I was younger. Oh, yeah. I still don't know what I've done wrong.

  • @RoboticShakedown U are close to the idea of invidious comparison.

  • @rachelsOne I typed this huge message to you. I promise there's nothing negative in it. But at the end, it said I had to be your friend. :(

  • @RoboticShakedown So where are you mNOW? natdemuk is back and all I see is u whining about me and not dealing with him. Oh what's that? You don't want to? Then I don't want to receive your responses either.

    U don't need to go to Iran to c the social control people try to use. Natdemuk is specimen #1.

  • @rachelsOne I haven't been on! You're so great at showing your intelligence. I don't stay on the computer all day. And honestly, I don't have much to say. The only ones with any intelligence would be Navel, Ferret and myself. He's mostly just attacking you. It has nothing to do with me.

  • @RoboticShakedown "I haven't been on! You're so great at showing your intelligence. I don't stay on the computer all day."

    Neither do I D-U-H! That doesn't negate that u are misdirecting your effort at the wrong person. I think ur slow or r purposefully ignoring the comments that idiot made.

    Doesn't matter if I called him a moron, NO woman, and NO lesbian deserves to be degraded without fighting back. U need to read ALL the commemts NOT just the ones on this page. Jesus ur S L O W,

  • @RoboticShakedown He's mostly just attacking me because I'm in his face. I don't reason with retards, I give them EXACTLY what they give me. U pple want to navel gaze w/ someone incapable of respectful discourse. I will virtually kick his ass while the cowards send me supportive comment privately. Now Get The Fuck Outta My Face.

  • @rachelsOne Now you are pathetic yourself, you promote abnormal lifestyles like homosexuality as normal when it is clear to me that you are a freak and you have a mental disorder yourself. I am not thick as you say, I use reason in my comments, you can't, you just use irrational emotion in your comments in order to piss me off, seriously kill yourself!

  • @NatDemUK Yeah I'm a slut, a whore, I make no logic (sense?), I'm a bitch, cunt. Yawn. Stop writing the SAME things over and over, they've lost their effectiveness.

    Here's a challenge, try behaving like a human and write something intelligent.  Do that everyday and maybe you'll develop enuf of a personality that someone will like you and be your father. If your mommy a lesbian? Is that why ur so upset? See I don't C what lesbians have 2 do w/ the fact that ur father abandoned you.

  • @NatDemUK I don't promote anything. The ONLY thing I am doing is advising you to look inside yourself to figure out why you are angry and alone. Lesbians don't have anything to do with that.

    You've been mad 4 days and guess what? B/C ur not smart.

    Lesbians are not going 2 change anything, that has nothing top do with me & Im NOT going to Kill Myself but U prolly will kill urself.

    No one cares what U think.

    I'm pissing U off? Honey you've been pissed off from day 1

  • @RoboticShakedown I really would not bother with this slapper, all she can ever do is rant all the time because she has a mental disorder or some kind.

  • @NatDemUK U don't possess the intellectual capacity to bother with a snail, much less a human. I thought that U hate DYKES but here U are running to RoboticShakeDown like a bitchass punk. LMAO. My disorder is that a moron like U thinks U can get away w/ insulting lesbians and that's not gonna happen. So you may as well just get used to it. If U want it to stop then leave.

  • @NatDemUK Final words: U DON'T know me. U don't know my past. U know nothing about me. STOP assuming that U know me. Stop guessing how I interact with my family because U don't know. The ONLY things U kno' are 1. I'm more educated and intelligent than U and 2. I am no longer responding to you. Goodbye.

  • Comment removed

  • @NatDemUK

    If I AM A WASTE OF TIME, THEN HOW PATHETIC ARE YOU WITH YOUR OBSESSION OVER ME?

    Do urself a favor and kill urself..It will be less painful then if a man hating dyke gets her hands on you.

  • @NatDemUK "Let us allow two incestuous siblings to adopt a child for the sake of them not having their own together because of birth defects."

    Whatever, I don't give a fuck what u allow you are powerless that's why YouTube is the only way u can't force your views on the rest of us. Ur impotent and powerless,

    Now take ur widdle dickey wickey and balls and get the fuck out of my face.

  • @rachelsOne HAHA you stupid fucking cow, it was a suggestion to show that "gay marriage" just redefines marriage itself and since incest, homosexuality, zoophilia and polyamory attack the nuclear family you might as well promote them as well. You say that I am coming up with bullshit, this is pure common sense actually, you promote one alternative lifestyle you promote another.

  • @NatDemUK "HAHA you stupid fucking cow"

    And wonder why you will never get laid.

  • @NatDemUK "this is pure common sense actually"

    Actually if you were educated then you'd be aware of the fact that "common sense" doesn't exist. There is ONLY "General Knowledge" and the concensus is that u are insecure in b/c of ur life & inability 2 get a woman.

    Therefore you blame every one else for ur failure.

    Tell u what: Tho' I won't promote Zoopohilia, I WILL ramp up my castration campaign. U my friend aren't even worthy of a dick. C'mere and lemme chop it off! HaHa

  • @rachelsOne Proves my point that you are a vile dyke and that you want to chop off a man's genitals which clearly shows the innate insanity of feminists. Common sense is what people use and it shows that they are not blinded by political correctness and believe what is useful for society. I am not insecure about my life bitch and for your information, I already did get laid with a woman on Saturday. You probably never have because you are feminist scum who hates men and will never get laid.

  • @NatDemUK As far as what I qouted, well it proves more than your bullshit hysterical extremist claims of coming incestual marriage and bestial inter marriage. I actually cited a studyu where u can make inference. U haven't cited shit. YOU are the one who has proven NOTHING, Kiss Mu Ass Oops ur not allowed LMAO

  • @NatDemUK U don't even kno m, so U have NO idea what my standards are w/ the exception that unlike U: I am educated and can actually think. Kiss my nass if you think that ur saving heterosexuality via YouTube.

  • @rachelsOne No, I do not know you and frankly I do not want to know any left-wing dykes like you spouting this bullshit that marriage glorifies men murdering wives because it is clearly just bullshit. Actually according to NARTH and the American College of Paediatricians, children raised by two same genders have faced distress, rebellious behaviour and suicide and of course, most pedophiles are homosexual as well.

  • @NatDemUK U do not want 2 know me? THANK U! I have little time for unstable pple anyway. I would speculate that ur hatred for women far outweighs my disdain for males. See I'm just not into men. However u cannot take a female rejecting U even if online. Y don't U try being sane & let it go already, then maybe a woman would be attracted to U.

    Women aren't attracted to the bullshit hysterical crap U write. Get a fucking Clue.

    MOST Pedophiles are Catholic Priests.

  • @rachelsOne You clearly are a wasted piece of shite!! I do not hate women, it is just that they are different to men but you hate men because you are a feminist scum bag who hates the idea of the two opposite genders living together and starting a family which is the bedrock of society, you hate that because you are a hysterical dyke! The pedophiles who are Catholic Priests have been shown to be homosexual as well actually.

  • @NatDemUK Doesn't narriage glorify men murdering women? If it didn't glorify the hostile nature of males then what r u doing in this thread being all hostile for? Trying to FORCE women who have not sought you out to be a certain way.

    I cited a source that directly contradicts ur claims, U have not cited shit. Shut the fuck up.

  • @rachelsOne You stupid stupid slapper, marriage glorifies the union between one man and one woman and it does not glorify the hostile nature of men, what the fuck are you talking about? Feminists are nothing but self-hating, suicidal crack-addicted dykes who just hate their gender, seriously get a life! I have not contradicted myself bitch, it is simply you who is spreading this bullshit.

  • @NatDemUK Whatever...I am DONE w/U Let it go. Learn that u CANNOT force pple to agree w/ U. I am NOT interested in establishing a relationship of any sort with you. Let it go. No one is suicidal here, or does drugs Here.

    WTF is WRONG w/ U? How desperate can U be?

    I have more of a life than U b/c I am not on YouTube losing my fucking mind like U R.

  • @NatDemUK "(CNN) -- A nearly 25-year study concluded that children raised in lesbian households were psychologically well-adjusted and had fewer behavioral problems than their peers."

    Now explain how your crazy ass is a better option.

  • Comment removed

  • und was bitte macht jetzt in diesem trailer, dass ich bestätigen muss, über 18 zu sein? .....

  • I don't see why it's not internationally illegal to have laws against homosexuality (and anything LGBT).

  • ooo here... here... I'm another proud "Persian" please give me citizenship to get out of Iran. I make gay movies too. but I don't have money or connections.

  • otro pais no puede acogerla??

    other country can not refugee? i don't know, Spain, Italy

  • This is horrible. I DO NOT ACCEPT HOMOSEXUALITY WHATSOEVER but I do adamantly believe in the rights of all human beings to live their lives without fear of death! This woman should be granted asylum if her life is being threatened. It is my personal belief that she should change her ways but regardless of what she chooses her life is in no ones hands but her Creator. We all may not believe the same things but this should not stop us from respecting the lives of all beings.

  • @BattleAngel While I am not a fan of your stance on homosexuality, it is nice and a great breath of fresh air to see people willing to allow people to do things with their life that they themselves disagree with.

  • @youcansuckmeofftube Same here. Some people can't even talk to me civilly because of my own religious beliefs. It is just as necessary for more people who support homosexuality to accept that there will always be others have different religion and beliefs regarding sex as much it is for those people who are against homosexuality to realize that not everyone will follow their beliefs. So its a breath of fresh air to find someone that will allow me to have my beliefs even though they may disagree!

  • Abbasso la repressione.

    Di chiunque.

    Uomo libero da battesimo.

    Per fortuna non associato a chiunque che crede che col danaro ed il potere possano decidere sulla vita altrui.

    Evviva L' Amore.

  • All my thoughts and prayers are with Kiana.

  • @checkeriran Good for you mate

  • The bastards managed to get one of the other trailers for Cul de Sac removed due to "terms of use violations." Cowards who are afraid of the truth of their country's lack of humanity being made global news. Listen, children, the sound you fear is that of feet progressing toward the reality of 2010 and beyond. You cannot stop us.

  • I am a Muslim and I am a Lesbian, and I am grateful that I live in a country that excepts me for who I am. Kiana Firouz, my heart is with you. I wish you the best of luck. xx

  • Kiana Firouz' case should get more publicity before it's too late

  • !!!

    One of the filmmakers/actresses, Kiana Firouz, has been denied refugee status in the United Kingdom and is about to be deported back to Iran, where she is most likely to be tortured and sentenced to death!

    PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AGAINST THIS, RESEARCH THE TOPIC AND SPREAD THE WORD!

    w w w(dot)petitiononline(dotcom)(s­lash)kianaf(slash)petition(dot­)html

    Give a Thumbs Up to keep this post at the top!

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @CarnivorousCuckatoo Will do and well done, CC. I am not of that persuasion but I know what's right and wrong. I wish more people did.

  • @CarnivorousCuckatoo The answer is no. Why the hell should I grant reguse to a bogus asylum seeker who has passed through all the first safe countries and simply wants to scrounge on the welfare system? She got what she deserved, her film is filled with pure pornographic degeneracy and ought to remain banned in Iran as well since pornography is just pure filth. If she is given asylum here, she will start making more porn films as well, so she must never be welcome here at all.

  • @NatDemUK you ignorant moron. There are plenty of British films far more explicit. How would you feel if a corrupt government was voted into the UK which meant you were at risk of being tortured and executed in public for something you have no control over? If you had an ounce of intellegence you would know by now that sexual orientation is not a choice and since it clearly matters to you I would also like to stress that I am Hetrosexual. Wake up love, it's 2010.

  • Great, what brilliant films we have as well- filled with sick degeneracy that brings nothing but decay to British society as she would. I would very much like the idea of a government that bans this sort of filth in the media because Iran, as you should know, has a high birthrates, condemns promiscuity, strong immigration control, a ban on pornography and other alternative lifestyles. Sexual orientation is a choice, you are not born with it, you develop it as you grow as it is based on nurture.

  • @NatDemUK

    Do you actually know a homosexual person? I thought not. Looking at your profile you are a BNP supporter. That says all I need to know about you and your opinions. You're a void non-entity. You support someone who tried to say the Haulocaust never happened, that if Hitler wasn't so daft he'd have eradicated all the jews and that women need beating. I live in London so I am well aware of the effects of immigration and over population but that doesn't give me an excuse to be inhumane

  • Homosexuality is not a race, it is a preference and it is an abnormality to society. Yes I am a BNP supporter; The Holocaust is a historical event, everyone is entitled to their opinion on a historical event just like Arhmadinejad; Griffin did not actually deny any massacres, he just show doubt about the gas chambers and SO WHAT?? History is open to debate; as for what he said about Hitler was about how stupid Hitler's ideas were and no, he did not say that women needed beating either, pure lies

  • @NatDemUK You don't choose your sexuality. I know that I didn't choose to be straight.

    Nick Griffin is a racist cock pretending to be a politician. He tried to cover his tracks by saying he was only disputing numbers but when actually directly questioned about it he refuses to answer.

  • @youcansuckmeofftube errr, yes you do because those who are gay were once straight and sometimes to change just like Michael Barrymore, you did choose to be straight because choice is based on experience and development. Having an opinion on the Holocaust or not does not mean that you are a racist, it just means that you have a historical opinion. I do not give a damn what he said, he still said that people were killed for fuck's sake, it is history it is open to debate.

  • @NatDemUK errr, no you don't, mental development based on life experience isn't something that your concious mind can effect or change in any way.

    Loving how you say you don't care what he said, and then start defending what he said.

  • @youcansuckmeofftube Yes, you do. Mental development can be changed by your mind, it just takes time to convince someone from changing as it did to Michael Barrymore or anyone else. People commit murder and that is a choice and people can change never to murder again. No, I don't care what he said about a historical event, it is his opinion, he says what he wants. Does a historical opinion kill anyone? No, it is just an opinion nothing else.

  • @NatDemUK There is evidence demonstrating that homosexuality is hard-wired into the brain. For example if a mother has several sons, statistically the younger sons are more likely to be born gay than the elder because of the effect of hormones in both child and mother; similar to how blood types can cause problems in the womb.

    Even if it weren't being homosexual affects no-one but the individual so why does what you or I think have any relevence? Everyone is entitled to their life.

  • @FerretBob No, there is no evidence that it is hard-wired in the brain for a start and if a mother has several sons, the youngest does not always turn gay because you fail to realise that the oldest one can be gay like the Jackson brothers where there were 5 of them and they were all straight themselves. Don't get your hopes up if it is genetic, because eventually every pregnant mother will have a pre-natal scan to find this disorder in the womb and have it removed.

  • @NatDemUK Actually there is. You will note that I did not say it is a guarantee; nor did I say that it was the only cause. There IS, however, documented correlation and evidence to back that information up.

    I also didn't say it was genetic; there are many pre-natal factors which are not directly affected by the genes

    Also I doubt that every woman would have it removed, even if it were possible to do so. Some people don't consider homosexuality a disorder. Because it's not.

  • That may mean that they are born the wrong gender; you are saying that it is genetic because genes are what make what you are, so if something is hard-wired in you, it would therefore be genetic. I think that every parent would like the idea of it because then it would put an end to all these queer activists and one day no-one will ever have to think about homosexuality ever again given that we will able to track down what biologically determines it.

  • @NatDemUK That is not what I said. It is not that people are born the wrong gender (although that can happen) but there is more to what makes you that just genes (and I say this as a collosal Darwin & Dawkins fan) Brain chemistry is not just genetically determined.

    I, when I have children, would NEVER elect to control their sexuality. It is entirely up to them. If they are gay and marry their own gender it does not hurt me and it does not hurt you. It is not our place to stop them.

  • This is becoming contradictory, the brain is completely complex and all it does is process everything, if brain chemistry is not determined then it is must be determined by nurture which in other words give place for choice. You have also said that you would never determine their sexuality, hang on, you said that you cannot choose it so I think that we will give every pre-natal scan and ultimately remove it. If homosexuality hurts no-one then neither does incest, polyamory nor zoophilia.

  • @NatDemUK sexual homosexual relationships are between two consenting adults and no one gets hurt.

    Incest can result in increased genetic problems in offspring, zoophilia exploits the animal and polyamory isn't illegal in most countries, although marriage between more than 2 people often is, but this is more for the legal side of things, rather than the moral issues.

  • @youcansuckmeofftube wrong, incest is between two consenting adults and no-one gets hurt. Homosexuality results in STDs because the anus is not designed to be penetrated and can lead to harm. Zoophilia exploits animals, not as bad as killing animals though.

  • @NatDemUK wrong, incest will potentially result in genetically inferior offspring.

    Homosexuality isn't limited to male one male sex, not to mention that many "straight" people also enjoy anal sex.

  • @youcansuckmeofftube wrong, genetically inferior people happen from non-incestuous people the most. Incest is not limited to brother and sister having unprotected sex either given that there is contraception, infertlity or homosexual incest as well. Anal sex between straight people is not so common and it is not the obligatory way for them like it is between males.

  • @NatDemUK not as a percentage they don't. If incestuous couples make a case to a court they can be allowed to have a sexual relationship, providing no offspring is produced.

    Anal sex between a heterosexual couples is more and more common these days, and even if it wasn't too common it's still enough to rule out your "anal sex is why we should make homosexuality illegal" point.

  • @youcansuckmeofftube I could not give a damn if anal sex happens more between straight couples, it is not the only way between them because there is always the front but between male sodomites that is the only way between them and it is not good for them as it can rather painful for them and there is no value in homosexuality either.

  • @NatDemUK There is value in homosexuality and that's evolutionally proven. It can be painful for them, but if they're consenting why do you have any right to tell them they're not allowed. I really want to know what gives you this right to control people you may never meet who do no harm to you.

  • @FerretBob It is not evolutionary proven, there is no value in homosexuality for society's benefit at all; people are not allowed to be incestuous, polyamorous nor zoophilic so there is no reason why I should respect a bunch of shit-stabbing queers nor even promote them. Heterosexuality needs to thrive a lot in order to keep society going, homosexuality owes nothing to it.

  • @NatDemUK Homosexuality has arisen in every human tribe across the globe to evolutionary benefit to each tribe. Every gay individual is a provider who will not produce further drains on the society's resources, they become incredibly useful and advantageous uncles and aunts. There are tribes around the world which treat the gay members with utmost respect because of the enormous benefit they provide. Given that the world is leaping and bounding towards overpopulation your last point is wrong

  • @FerretBob All abnormalities have thrived in all other tribes across the world, and no they do not get endorsed at all, they have been despised and frowned upon. You do not need homosexuality to balance the population because then you could use zoophilia or in fact inflatable objects in fact for crying out loud, we have contraception that can easily be encouraged for heterosexuals so there is absolutely no reason to promote an alternative lifestyle that destroys the basis of society.

  • @NatDemUK You are incorrect. I can only say again that you need to actually research what you are saying instead of using your gut instinct to argue this case.

    Dr Glenn Wilson has done a lot of research into this, there is also some discussion in The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins.

    Biological effects are not limited to genetics any A-level biology student could tell you that.

    How do alternative sexualities destroy the basis of society? Give me concrete proof, peer-reviewed research

  • @FerretBob One thing I do not see any evidence that it is hard-wired and even it were it would be considered biological/ genetic and since you are saying that it is not, then that does not make sense to me at all. Alternative sexualities encourage society to believe that they are normal and that they are just the same as monoamorist, heterosexual, anthropophilic and non-incestuous relationships when they clearly are not, so that means that there is no reason to promote or endorse them.

  • @NatDemUK Ok, I can show you the evidence. Read Born Gay by Dr Glenn Wilson which discusses, studies and has examples. Biological is not purely genetic, there are other biological causes.

    If you're so convinced that you're right then you won't be afraid to read something that disagrees with your position.

  • @NatDemUK Okay, ignoring the fact that homosexuality occurs in most sexual species on the planet, even if it is not 'normal,' why is that a bad thing?

    I'm not normal, I have bipolar disorder and aspergers syndrome. Should there be laws prohibiting me as well?

    Normality is in the eye of the beholder. To my family and I you are abnormal for your arrogant and hateful attitude towards the alternate sexualities. To you we are abnormal because we welcome the right of all people gay, straight &between

  • @FerretBob No, you idiot, bipolar disorder and aspergers are frowned upon as well and psychologists and scientists are even looking for ways to cure it, and no-one is promoting them as a lifestyle. Why is that? Because the two are damaging to society. No, I am not abnormal, I am not politically correct by your ill standards, there is no reason to promote homosexuality and there never will.

  • @NatDemUK Actually they are not frowned upon, most people treat sufferers with sympathy as with anyone who has an illness.

    I don't consider myself politically correct, I just believe that everyone has a right to live their life unmolested by others. If two (or more) people love each other they have a right to marry and raise a family even if you (important though your opinion doubtless is) disagree.

  • @FerretBob No, even if people with those two disorders are treated with respect they are still researched into how they can be cured and they are not promoted as a normal lifestyle and the sort of people that marry are one man and one woman of the same species as it is they that create the family because monogamous heterosexuality is the bedrock of society, not other alternative lifestyles- they have no inherent value at all to society. Plus, homosexuality and polyamory have a high risk of STDs.

  • @NatDemUK Sir, you ignore what I say.

    Homosexuality has great value and gay people were and are respected in many tribes around the world because they add another hunter, another farmer but do not produce more children and stretch what is available for the tribe.

    The STD issue is a non-issue. Firstly even if there is a high risk, that is no business of yours or mine secondly you are assuming promiscuity. Every gay or poly person I know has been in a commited, faithful relationship(s) for years

  • I have not even heard of any tribe that advocates an alternative lifestyle to society as normal, homosexuality has been hated in many societies and has even suffered execution. For population control, we have contraception and besides the birthrates in Britain are going down because of this. No, STD is an issue because it has been spread the most amongst those two groups: I do not give a damn whether they are loving faithful, they are abnormal and what they practise is not the basis of society.

  • @NatDemUK Several tribes in Africa, the Amazon, the Americas (The Zapotecs for example) and Indonesia are pro-homosexuality. The most significant factor of anti-homosexuality are Abrahamic Religions. Where those religions didn't get, homosexuality was not victimised.

    I disagree with your assumption that monogamous, hetero relationships are the basis for society. The extended family is more applicable and in this situation gay individuals provide a major advantage. As important as a childless 1.

  • @FerretBob Did you even know that several tribes practised zoophilia as well? That would have probably been a way to have population control as well. In fact hardly has homosexuality ever been tolerated in Africa, homosexuals have has always faced execution. Of course monogamous heterosexual relationships are the basis of society because they are what bring society into existence- two people from the opposite gender only needs to bring a group of offspring, nothing more.

  • @NatDemUK Yes, but you're using logical fallacies there: several tribes practiced X so Y must be bad as well. Africa is a big place, most of the tribes were not that aggressive until forcibly converted to Christianity.

  • @NatDemUK The nuclear family that we have grown up in is a very modern phenomenon; that's even obvious in the name. Before the twentieth century the extended family was the basis and I've already outlined the benefits there. Also assuming that the basis is unchanging is foolish as well, the basis of western families used to consist of woman as inferior beings used only for procreation.

  • @FerretBob The nuclear family has always been in existence and has always required the opposite genders and the same applies to the extended family as well in order for them to procreate. The basis is not unchanging, because man and woman are what bring society into existence, because if they don't then society decays.

  • @NatDemUK No, it hasn't. It wasn't a viable family format until the 17th-18th centuries and only really took off after industrialisation (Traditions and Encounters: A Brief Global History by Bentley, Ziegler and Salter)

    You never say what you mean by a 'decay in society.' I am at a loss to understand what you think will happen to you or me if gay people r allowed to marry. Society survived women and non-white people voting, it survived the industrial revolution; what on Earth can gay people do?

  • @NatDemUK Well you have failed to explain how anything you describe could possibly damage "society" and you have consistently ignored points that I raise. You also changed your tune everytime I presented some evidence. You have left me with no other conclusion that your opinion that homosexuality is wrong and that gay people should not be allowed to marry is nothing more than the product of your own personal prejudice. It's depressing to see someone as young as me so blinded by fear and hate.

  • @FerretBob You have not presented me with any evidence, you just say that homosexuality is good and that it was honoured a lot when it clearly was not because homosexuals even faced persecution under non-Christian or non-Islamic regimes. It would damage society a lot because it would make same gender groups being together and it would destroy the purpose of society as well and for society to live on it needs to be straight, and anal sex can be harmful as well given that the anus is not designed

  • @NatDemUK

    Your comment re: "it would make same gender groups being together and it would destroy the purpose of society as well" is utter nonsense. No one is going to magically "make" heterosexuals into homosexuals and heterosexuals are still by far the majority of society. They will (and do!) continue to breed more human beings, and are currently doing so at a rate that threatens the ecosystems and natural resources of the entire planet.

  • @Navel8 Exactly which is why there is no reason for "gay marriage" because it completely undermines the whole traditional notion of marriage as it would if there were zoophiles, incests or polyamorists and the reason why the majority of society are heterosexuals is because they keep society in existence and keep it going, so homosexuality has absolutely nothing to value nor glorify. This whole view of overpopulation is a lie because in Britain birth rates are starting to decrease.

  • @NatDemUK I supplied you with evidence which proves that homosexuality is hard-wired and determined before birth - the book Born Gay by Dr. Glenn Wilson.

    Also homosexuality not being condemned and actually being welcomed is described in The Greatest Show On Earth by Prof. Richard Dawkins.

    You have never explained how the presence of gay individuals damages society, it just damages your view of society. Anal sex doesn't explain why you're against lesbianism and it is very rarely harmful anyway.

  • @NatDemUK

    How would gay marriage encourage incest marriage? Please, I'd love to know how you came to that conclusion.

    Also, no-one is 'promoting' gay marriage, just campaigning for equal rights. And why do you care so much? If you don't like gay marriage, don't get one!

    Finally, what's wrong with polyamory, or having an open relationship with more than one partner? I think that as long as it's consensual & everyone knows where they stand, then it shouldn't be an issue.

  • Because it is redifining marriage and it would therefore give way to other alternative lifestyles that want marriage rights as well such as incest, polyamory or zoophilia. No-one is promoting gay marriage but equal rights? Contradiction there, they are promoting that it is normal and that homosexuality is the same as heterosexuality, it is obviously not and serves no meaning to society. I do not give a damn if one is homosexual, polyamorist or incestuous, just don't go promoting for equal rights

  • @NatDemUK The notion that "monogamous heterosexual relationships are the basis of society" is not borne out by history at all. For instance, in many parts of the world, relationships between one man and as many women as he could afford to "keep" were common. Infidelity and divorce are RAMPANT in the heterosexual population. The result? A host of blended and nontraditional family structures. Modern society has not collapsed. It has evolved, and civil rights for ALL citizens are long overdue.

  • @Navel8 Yes, it is born out of history, it is quite obvious given that Western Europe always condemned polyamory, I do not give a damn about other parts of the world where polyamory thrived but that is no excuse to promote that as well. And infidelity and divorce are not healthy for the family unit are they? They simply destroy it. Modern society has degenerated a lot and it must stop.

  • @NatDemUK Homosexuality and polyamory are not damaging to society, just to your view of what society should be. I know this may come as a shock to you but just because you have a belief it is not the only possible interpretation of fairness.

    I was not rude to you, I made all of my points politely and suggested some more information, there was no reason at all for you to insult me.

  • @NatDemUK Ok, I can show you the evidence. Read Born Gay by Dr Glenn Wilson which discusses, studies and has examples. Biological is not purely genetic, there are other biological causes.

    If you're so convinced that you're right then you won't be afraid to read something that disagrees with your position.

  • @NatDemUK and you still haven't said what gives you this right to dictate to people what they can and can't do if it hurts no third-party.

  • @FerretBob You might as well say that falling in love with deaf-dumb-blind people equates to pedophilia given that they cannot communicate and animals can give out body expression hence why we have them as pets; pre-Chilean Amerindians used to have sex with Llamas and again what is worse? Loving animals or killing them? Plus, it depends on how you love the animal. It gives me the right to dictate what two freaks do because that makes a bad effect on society just like polyamory and incest.