very nice video. this might inform some ppl who post angry, rather than informative. the only thing is, thermite has been recorded to exceed 5k degrees.
ok i admit, im not a scientist nor an engineer/chemist but i will ask the stupid question anyway...why the fuck would someone use thermite/thermate to burn through a safe? if im not mistaken (and i probably am), wouldn't you burn all of that (ahem, flamable) money? and if money isnt in there, wouldnt it absolutely fuck up anything in there to make it furthermore unvaluable? only a half baked thief would ever try that.
just so you dont ALL think Steven Jones is a nut, check out he architect's and engineers video debunking the "fuel" theory. Steven jones has an actual piece of the molten metal from the WTC site, and it has been analyzed by 5 independant labs specializing in metalurgy, and, yes, horror of all horrors, he is RIGHT! Not only was Thermite used, but also Thermate. Big, bad, mean hot shit that is!! So, check out Steven Jones, Richard, oh, cant remember his lat name. They are right.
I have not studied reviewed the cold fusion" debacle, but believe it was probably an honest mistake. Good thing fellow scientists reviewed their work and found their error. In this vid the BYU guy saying thermite was used to destroy the WTC is just offering an opinion based on an observation. (Doesn't mean it's right.) Did he do any scientific experiments to validate? No
I'd like see an interview with him today to see if his opinion has changed after seeing all the current evidence.
Have you taken (and passed) a high school chemistry class?
Look at the stoichiometry of the chemical reactions. Any one who has taken a high school chemistry class would immediately recognize the chemical equation in the vid is not balanced. Since the basic chemistry is flawed, any argument based on that chemistry is flawed.
Skeptic121 you are being duped by someone who is using junk science to try and win an argument.
One "mistake" I see is that safe. It is a "records safe" that it is designed to resist fire and protect documents from burning up. We don't know how well it worked in this video because we don't see the documents. A "money safe" has much thicker steel, several inches instead of maybe 1/8 inch on that records safe.
One needs thermATE to cut through thick steel. ThermATE is thermITE plus sulfur. The sulfur makes a more energetic and brilliant white flame that cuts through the steel like butter
I hope you don't blame Steven Jones for the "cold fusion" debacle. He was the cautious one and was scooped by two shysters named Pons and Fleischman. Jones went on TV afterward and pointed out that their neutron detector responded to many events other than neutrons. It was P&F who claimed their reaction produced more energy than it consumed. Originally the three, P, F, and J, had agreed to publish together, but P&F called a press conference to beat Jones to the punch.
The actual amount that Neils Harrit, the Danish College professor claims was needed, was 10 to 100 TONS of NANO thermite. What an Arse! It's hard to move and store the 20 lbs used in this video. Think of the Static electricity danger alone. I wish the conspiracy people would try to make NANO thermite. That Way, Darwin Awards would get some new cases.
Good point! Burning jet fuel and office fires collapsed the buildings, but thermite never could have done it...according to the official story believers.
If you can ignite thermite with static electricity, please post the video here!
The usual problem with thermite is the difficulty of igniting it.
The nanothermite (or whatever you want to call it) that Harrit studied is obviously difficult to manufacture, which suggests to us it was not made in a cave in Afghanistan by towel-heads.
Oh wow. All this time I saw 2 PLANES go into the buildings. Gosh. So did the rest of the world. When all of you conspiracy people finally figure out that this was a terrorist act (they don't use thermite)....and that two planes were in fact hijacked and crashed into the building; people died, literally - their family members are MISSING and DEAD for crying out loud, because it was a real event that killed thousands of real people.
A missile does not carry passengers on it, unfortunately. This so-called conspiracy would have required more thermite than anyone can really get their hands on. Not to mention getting the stuff up into a building that was no doubt pretty secure and extremely busy. I've seen thermite placed on the hood of a car - it went through the hood and engine block in just a few seconds. Falls straight down, except for sparks. That wouldn't collapse all of the support beams in a building that size, sorry.
The commentator sounds like Richard Hammond?
xXBasshunterXx1 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xXBasshunterXx1 It is.
roflcopterkklol 1 month ago
i've seen thermite melt an engine block to a molten puddle. this stuff is nasty.
XdrFaustusTheoristX 11 months ago
very nice video. this might inform some ppl who post angry, rather than informative. the only thing is, thermite has been recorded to exceed 5k degrees.
XdrFaustusTheoristX 11 months ago
recorded with a microweave?
MrSaggat 1 year ago
recorded with a toaster ?
patator2512 1 year ago
I made a paper airplane that says greetings from 9/11
gamerx112 1 year ago
what happens if you drop it on the ground? does it just keep going down into the earths core
TheAwsomeguy77 1 year ago
great video!!! keep up the good work
chaosad09 1 year ago
ok i admit, im not a scientist nor an engineer/chemist but i will ask the stupid question anyway...why the fuck would someone use thermite/thermate to burn through a safe? if im not mistaken (and i probably am), wouldn't you burn all of that (ahem, flamable) money? and if money isnt in there, wouldnt it absolutely fuck up anything in there to make it furthermore unvaluable? only a half baked thief would ever try that.
MTBJester 1 year ago
just so you dont ALL think Steven Jones is a nut, check out he architect's and engineers video debunking the "fuel" theory. Steven jones has an actual piece of the molten metal from the WTC site, and it has been analyzed by 5 independant labs specializing in metalurgy, and, yes, horror of all horrors, he is RIGHT! Not only was Thermite used, but also Thermate. Big, bad, mean hot shit that is!! So, check out Steven Jones, Richard, oh, cant remember his lat name. They are right.
orangevalesweetpea 2 years ago
I have not studied reviewed the cold fusion" debacle, but believe it was probably an honest mistake. Good thing fellow scientists reviewed their work and found their error. In this vid the BYU guy saying thermite was used to destroy the WTC is just offering an opinion based on an observation. (Doesn't mean it's right.) Did he do any scientific experiments to validate? No
I'd like see an interview with him today to see if his opinion has changed after seeing all the current evidence.
MSFTMVP 2 years ago
Skeptic121
Have you taken (and passed) a high school chemistry class?
Look at the stoichiometry of the chemical reactions. Any one who has taken a high school chemistry class would immediately recognize the chemical equation in the vid is not balanced. Since the basic chemistry is flawed, any argument based on that chemistry is flawed.
Skeptic121 you are being duped by someone who is using junk science to try and win an argument.
MSFTMVP 2 years ago
One "mistake" I see is that safe. It is a "records safe" that it is designed to resist fire and protect documents from burning up. We don't know how well it worked in this video because we don't see the documents. A "money safe" has much thicker steel, several inches instead of maybe 1/8 inch on that records safe.
One needs thermATE to cut through thick steel. ThermATE is thermITE plus sulfur. The sulfur makes a more energetic and brilliant white flame that cuts through the steel like butter
Skeptic121 2 years ago
BYU has some good professors, they also have some whose theorys have been ripped apart by their peers.
MSFTMVP 2 years ago
MSFTMVP:
I hope you don't blame Steven Jones for the "cold fusion" debacle. He was the cautious one and was scooped by two shysters named Pons and Fleischman. Jones went on TV afterward and pointed out that their neutron detector responded to many events other than neutrons. It was P&F who claimed their reaction produced more energy than it consumed. Originally the three, P, F, and J, had agreed to publish together, but P&F called a press conference to beat Jones to the punch.
Skeptic121 2 years ago
The actual amount that Neils Harrit, the Danish College professor claims was needed, was 10 to 100 TONS of NANO thermite. What an Arse! It's hard to move and store the 20 lbs used in this video. Think of the Static electricity danger alone. I wish the conspiracy people would try to make NANO thermite. That Way, Darwin Awards would get some new cases.
Merlin5x5 2 years ago
but at the same time you say that it did not need explosives.....
So what it took, no explosives or tens of tons?
That's a logical fallacy.
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
Good point! Burning jet fuel and office fires collapsed the buildings, but thermite never could have done it...according to the official story believers.
Skeptic121 2 years ago
If you can ignite thermite with static electricity, please post the video here!
The usual problem with thermite is the difficulty of igniting it.
The nanothermite (or whatever you want to call it) that Harrit studied is obviously difficult to manufacture, which suggests to us it was not made in a cave in Afghanistan by towel-heads.
Skeptic121 2 years ago
Yes, thermite can be ignited with a static discharge.
MSFTMVP 2 years ago
Did this guy take a basic high school chemistry class? If he did I hope he didn't pass. His reactions and the products of the reaction are wrong.
Dude go back to high school to get it stright.
Douggg 2 years ago
"Dude go back to high school to get it stright. "
What exactly did he not get stright?
Skeptic121 2 years ago
The chemestry and physics.
Listen carefully to the chemical reactions, (reactants and products) they are wrong.
Anyone who took a basic high school chemistry class would immediatly see the flaw in the chemical reaction.
MSFTMVP 2 years ago
Hello Folks!
Could anyone (MSFTMVP or Dougg) explain the mistakes in the video to which you refer?
I want to make sure I understand WHICH mistakes you mean. THANKS!
Skeptic121 2 years ago
only 292 views?
this is how they brought down the WtC buildings! all three of them. WTC7 was a more traditional demolition
tcoc112233 3 years ago
ure an idiot...
streetfire002 2 years ago
Oh wow. All this time I saw 2 PLANES go into the buildings. Gosh. So did the rest of the world. When all of you conspiracy people finally figure out that this was a terrorist act (they don't use thermite)....and that two planes were in fact hijacked and crashed into the building; people died, literally - their family members are MISSING and DEAD for crying out loud, because it was a real event that killed thousands of real people.
jmr1068204 2 years ago
A missile does not carry passengers on it, unfortunately. This so-called conspiracy would have required more thermite than anyone can really get their hands on. Not to mention getting the stuff up into a building that was no doubt pretty secure and extremely busy. I've seen thermite placed on the hood of a car - it went through the hood and engine block in just a few seconds. Falls straight down, except for sparks. That wouldn't collapse all of the support beams in a building that size, sorry.
jmr1068204 2 years ago
I must have missed the plane going into WTC7...and I don't think anyone denies that several thousand people were killed.
Skeptic121 2 years ago