looks like it was lots of people just dont seem to get this is made for the fans, no one else - ofcourse its pointless if your not into the franchise...
@chj2 it was a response to a comment by FirstLevelPreview purely defending what is a pretty cool concept for fans of any movie. Dont know why it didnt come up as a response. but seriously chj2, my comment irritated you that much that you had to have a dig? are you that much of a wanker? whatever man.
@chj2 it was a response to a comment by FirstLevelPreview purely defending what is a pretty cool concept for fans of any movie. Dont know why it didnt come up as a response. but seriously chj2, my comment irritated you that much that you had to have a dig? are you that much of a wanker? whatever man.
Watch a Pre-January 8th copy of Inception. Listen closely when the actors say imagine, reality, and safe, or point pistols. You'll hear the words, Loughner, offin' her, part of the word Giffords, and much more. Some say they hear, do it.
Watch a Pre-January 8th copy of Inception. Listen closely when the actors say imagine, reality, and safe, or point pistols. You'll hear the words, Loughner, offin' her, part of the word Giffords, and much more. Some say they hear, do it.
@LURTSCH I would rather have it explain to me why some people CLAIM that the CGI-model of Clu looks bad. It doesn't, it's not different than a human actor. You guys just jump around on that because you know that it is not a real person.
@RenoGregory: They're getting cheaper by the day (and I mean the models from Samsung, Sony, Pioneer, Akai, RCA, etc, NOT the cheaply-made ones on sale at Wal-Mart.) Shop around for the best deal.
@TheJediCharles Well, here it is (rightfully) forbidden to use symbols like the Swastika, quotes like "Sieg Heil", abnegating the Holocaust, show the Hitler salute, ... I think it's a shame that this is not forbidden in every country.
Re-reading the first comment I answered too, maybe I overreacted a bit, but it always upsets me when people use that kind of stuff.
But, as for over-reacting to it and having it "always upset you" when people use it for effect it's a matter similar to any other vulgarity. If people normally use it in place of actually having something to say worth hearing.
But, as far as being "against the law" to use Nazi references for little more than dramatic effect, I disagree 100% that it's a good thing. It's just more speech control. Laws won't make vulgar morons disappear.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles I disagree here. Freedom of speech has it's limits as soon as it inflicts with other people's values or rights (harm principle / offense principle / hate speech / ...), and I think that's a good thing. Of course you can't make morons behave 100% through laws (but prohibition already lowers the number of incidents compared to as if it would be freely allowed), but that doesn't mean we should give them a free hand.
When you say freedom of speech has it's limits, that's obvious. It should be illegal to shout fire in a crowded theatre as it's measurably harmful.
But, if you believe freedom of speech comes second to the sensitivity of the listener, you don't believe in freedom of speech. Period. I doesn't matter if you support people saying things that other's find acceptable. It takes no courage to defend pleasant speech.
Matters of freedom of speech aren't even an issue until one says something objectionable to another. I personally believe the value is misnamed, as it should be called "Freedom of Objectionable Speech".
Where your position caves in is anyone can claim anything is offensive.
I can understand why it's particularly a touchy subject in Germany. But, the modern day German needs to rethink matters if he thinks he can "make stupidity and being willfully disagreeable" against the law.
I hope you can see how to those of us outside your borders it looks like you continue to struggle with totalitarian thought control, just in a different direction than before.
No offense.
Get used to hearing the outside world use "Nazi" in a cavalier, cartoony degree. Really.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles I believe in the Freedom of Speech with it's limitations, I do not share your "all or nothing" attitude. Not on this matter, not on any other. Not every right / idea principle / ... is perfect (subjective) as it is written down, tweaks / updates / ... are almost always neccessary. The world has more colors to offer than just black and white, saying "you don't accept an idea at all if you don't accept it without proposing changes for the (subjective) better" is just untrue.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles Of course there is always a point where a protest against a hate speech is no rightful and justified objection but a mere trifle, but I think the courts are doing a good job filtering out the latter.
It actually takes more heart, skill and social sentiment to use the limited FoS instead of being “””courageously””” brusque, rude and impolite.
What do you gain from your full-on Freedom of Speech anyway in comparison to the restricted version that makes your variant so much
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles better and desirable? You exchange the protection of a human's ehtics, beliefs, values and integrity against the allowance to insult people on every imaginable level. Not because that additional "freedom" is really needed. Not because you couldn't have expressed the things you wanted to say in a different, acceptable way without being limited in your freedom of thought / expression: JUST because. Because you can then say: "Look, I have more rights than you! My country, the land
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles of the free men! Where you are free to express yourself any way you want (but are subsequently forced to suck it up if somebody else exerts his rights). Objectively regarded, this makes the society uncomfortable, creating unneccessary sources of friction which ultimately explode in one way or another, but hey: I have the RIGHT to do it!"
No offense man, but that's the way it's coming across. I can see absolutely no reason for or benefit from that additional piece of freedom,
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles only negative results. Do you really think that's worth it? That this is a positive tradeoff? I don't think so, but I'm afraid I know your answer as well.
Take your gun laws for another example of how unlimited freedom is not always a good thing. Some law from the Wild West-era (where guns were needed to rob the natives of their homeland) allows every adult citizen to carry a gun for self protection, thus making the country a safer place. Ironically, the opposite is true.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles Easy weapon access produces more opportunities, produces easier ways to solve problems of any kind. "Weapons don't kill people, people kill people". Wrong! People with easy access to weapons kill people (Armed or not. Let's face it, if you stare down the barrel of a mugger in a dark alley, you're not whipping your weapon out faster then he pulls the trigger.).
So again, this more than dubious protection is worth all the additional lost lives, all the tragedy that would have
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles been avoided for the major part? No man, just... no.
Also, your whole last comment makes the impression that you're seeing our "total freedom vs. limited freedom" debate under the nazi-context of the other guy's comment only. This is not the case. Germany is luckily not the only country with that sort of limited FoS. We are not the only country that has hard regulations regarding hate speech in general and nazi-related restrictions in special. Actually, if you closely compare
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles the american stance with all those freedoms to the other industrial nations, you'll see that you're standing pretty much alone (in all this extent). So again, this is no germany-specific issue, just debating limited FoS in general, and has certainly nothing to do with "totalitarian thought control". Now you sound like one of those conspiracy theorists who tell you to put tinfoil over your head so the government can't read your mind.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles look past all the hollow phrases like "it is our god-given duty / right to...", "it is part of the american way of life" etc. etc. that your leaders routinely sprout almost mantra-like to justify anything and everything, then maybe, MAYBE you'll see some day that restrictions are a benefit to society as a whole, as weird as it may sound.
I go on record here with saying that the day where slurs and impolite, insulting speech are considered "cavalier" in the major part of the
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles world will mark the ultimate downfall of humanity. It's been getting worse and worse over the last decade anyway, especially since the rapid development of the internet.
I guess the cultures with all their different rules and freedoms that we grew up in are so natural to us that we cannot feel into or understand another point of view. You can't imagine that restrictions have positive sides and I fail to see any benefit from total freedom. Was nice to get some insight though.
Odd that someone who argues against freer speech needs to use so many comment fields.
"You can't imagine that restrictions have positive sides and I fail to see any benefit from total freedom."
Way to distort both arguments there, pal. I never said I don't see the benefit of restrictions and I never claimed to believe in total freedom. You're exhibit A in why restrictions on speech is a failure because people can claim to have heard anything and are then free to react wrongly.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles I need many comment fields because Youtube sadly has a pretty low character limit. Free speech (limited or not) also has nothing to do with the length of the spoken (or written) text. You know that as well.
I re-read your first three comments and it still comes across that you believe in the full free speech and don't believe in the restricted variant. Same with the last sentence of your latest comment. If you think I misunderstood you, feel free to rephrase your opinion.
I had an initial statement, but also further clarification. but your response did not regard it all,but only a wrongly summarized version. You basically leave the impression that clarification is wasted on you because you're fixated only on the portions you prefer to deal with.
Here's something to leave you with, and I am leaving.
A person's usage of Nazi-esque references for mere effect is less offensive than a wish or legal force to silence him on those grounds alone. The end.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles I answered to everything you said in your comments whereas you ignored each and every point I brought up in my oh-so-long response, yet you accuse me of answering selective?
You argue against limited FoS and say that everybody should be allowed to say anything (except measureably harmful stuff like the fire-scenario) but then claim to be misunderstood and refuse a better clarification. That makes as much sense as the last sentence of your previous comment (Allowing rude speech
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@TheJediCharles speech prevents "misunderstandings"?) or the last part from your last comment. After all, that's entirely subjective and the majority of the industrialized nations luckily disagrees there, leaving your allowance for cheap, primitive and offensive grandstagery a minority's point of view.
cant Waite until the ipad 3 comes out with 3d , just dreaming but this looks like an awesome feature i have neither but this just makes it more appealing, i saw it at the Melbourne premier and loved it awesome move and having tablet features will bring users closer to the grid
@michaelmitchell2206 My mistake. Thought you were dissing this feature. I LOVE Second Screen.
chj2 19 hours ago
YOU SHUT YOUR WHORE MOUTH
A1R5N1P3R 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SIMPLY,..COPY,;,&`';PASTE'`,
ＷＷＷ.ＷＡＴＣＨＦＵＬＬＭＯＶＩＥ.ＴＫ
SIMPLY,;.COPY.'.&'`.PASTE;.`
PaigeJoyc 9 months ago
Human CentiPad
SpyengoEen 9 months ago
looks like it was lots of people just dont seem to get this is made for the fans, no one else - ofcourse its pointless if your not into the franchise...
michaelmitchell2206 10 months ago
@michaelmitchell2206 And you putting your comment stating that on this particular page is even more pointless. . .
chj2 1 day ago
@chj2 it was a response to a comment by FirstLevelPreview purely defending what is a pretty cool concept for fans of any movie. Dont know why it didnt come up as a response. but seriously chj2, my comment irritated you that much that you had to have a dig? are you that much of a wanker? whatever man.
michaelmitchell2206 1 day ago
@chj2 it was a response to a comment by FirstLevelPreview purely defending what is a pretty cool concept for fans of any movie. Dont know why it didnt come up as a response. but seriously chj2, my comment irritated you that much that you had to have a dig? are you that much of a wanker? whatever man.
michaelmitchell2206 1 day ago
Sorry no release for Android.
cosmickuto 10 months ago
Brought to you by Daft Punks technologic vault
DaveyJohnsLocker502 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch a Pre-January 8th copy of Inception. Listen closely when the actors say imagine, reality, and safe, or point pistols. You'll hear the words, Loughner, offin' her, part of the word Giffords, and much more. Some say they hear, do it.
jamestargetedindiv 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch a Pre-January 8th copy of Inception. Listen closely when the actors say imagine, reality, and safe, or point pistols. You'll hear the words, Loughner, offin' her, part of the word Giffords, and much more. Some say they hear, do it.
jamestargetedindiv 11 months ago
Makes you not want to see Tron
bigsky1970 11 months ago
@bigsky1970 It does?
Ultimaterocker102 10 months ago
the score for this movie is so epic, it reminds me a lot of inception's
Cineman513 11 months ago
whoa i pad :o
americangirlmegan11 11 months ago
Looks pointless
FirstLevelPreview 11 months ago
My cousin worked on this so Proud!
SarahFunes 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IF YOU HAVE A GALAXY TAB OR A MOTOROLA XOOM?!
thumbs up for this comment and thumbs down for the video if you agree :)
onkelsrache 11 months ago
i have no idea what i just watched? It's an app? ...
xBl00dBrothersX 11 months ago
Lesbians love what?
DJacqu8351 11 months ago
why would you need a second screen to watch a bluray?
3d is enough, isn't it?
onkelsrache 11 months ago
The best part of the movie was the Daft Punk soundtrack and I already have that on CD. This? Meh.
imroy264 11 months ago 2
Hmm, i think i'll unsub now. i've seen the movie.
fordy929 11 months ago
who needs this shit anyway
buddhasmk 11 months ago
Will it explain why CLU looks so bad?
LURTSCH 11 months ago
@LURTSCH I would rather have it explain to me why some people CLAIM that the CGI-model of Clu looks bad. It doesn't, it's not different than a human actor. You guys just jump around on that because you know that it is not a real person.
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago 3
@xSuperiorManx: WORD!!!
Neville6000 11 months ago
how about iPhone?
angerawrs 11 months ago
That is one huge index finger.
uncachable 11 months ago 2
Do want.
Need a frickin bluray player for our 60 inch HDTV!!!
RenoGregory 11 months ago
@RenoGregory: They're getting cheaper by the day (and I mean the models from Samsung, Sony, Pioneer, Akai, RCA, etc, NOT the cheaply-made ones on sale at Wal-Mart.) Shop around for the best deal.
Neville6000 11 months ago
Android or GTFO
dirtmound 11 months ago
hrm...i see a severe lack of Android love here.
overwheat 11 months ago
>Obvious advertisement for the iPad
Disney, really? I thought you were above waving Sieg Heils to steve Jobbs.
ZKoftherebellion 11 months ago
@ZKoftherebellion Disney probably thought you were above using unfitting (and in most countries forbidden nazi references. See, you both were wrong.
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
@xSuperiorManx >implying Hitler wouldn't aprove of Steve Job's tactics
cracked.com/article_18377_5-reasons-you-should-be-scared-apple.html
ZKoftherebellion 11 months ago
@xSuperiorManx
Forbidden? Specifics please.
TheJediCharles 11 months ago
@TheJediCharles Well, here it is (rightfully) forbidden to use symbols like the Swastika, quotes like "Sieg Heil", abnegating the Holocaust, show the Hitler salute, ... I think it's a shame that this is not forbidden in every country.
Re-reading the first comment I answered too, maybe I overreacted a bit, but it always upsets me when people use that kind of stuff.
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
@xSuperiorManx
Well, it's obviously a matter of context.
But, as for over-reacting to it and having it "always upset you" when people use it for effect it's a matter similar to any other vulgarity. If people normally use it in place of actually having something to say worth hearing.
But, as far as being "against the law" to use Nazi references for little more than dramatic effect, I disagree 100% that it's a good thing. It's just more speech control. Laws won't make vulgar morons disappear.
TheJediCharles 11 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles I disagree here. Freedom of speech has it's limits as soon as it inflicts with other people's values or rights (harm principle / offense principle / hate speech / ...), and I think that's a good thing. Of course you can't make morons behave 100% through laws (but prohibition already lowers the number of incidents compared to as if it would be freely allowed), but that doesn't mean we should give them a free hand.
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
@xSuperiorManx
When you say freedom of speech has it's limits, that's obvious. It should be illegal to shout fire in a crowded theatre as it's measurably harmful.
But, if you believe freedom of speech comes second to the sensitivity of the listener, you don't believe in freedom of speech. Period. I doesn't matter if you support people saying things that other's find acceptable. It takes no courage to defend pleasant speech.
TheJediCharles 11 months ago
@xSuperiorManx
Matters of freedom of speech aren't even an issue until one says something objectionable to another. I personally believe the value is misnamed, as it should be called "Freedom of Objectionable Speech".
Where your position caves in is anyone can claim anything is offensive.
Thank God I live in America.
TheJediCharles 11 months ago 3
@xSuperiorManx
I can understand why it's particularly a touchy subject in Germany. But, the modern day German needs to rethink matters if he thinks he can "make stupidity and being willfully disagreeable" against the law.
I hope you can see how to those of us outside your borders it looks like you continue to struggle with totalitarian thought control, just in a different direction than before.
No offense.
Get used to hearing the outside world use "Nazi" in a cavalier, cartoony degree. Really.
TheJediCharles 11 months ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles I believe in the Freedom of Speech with it's limitations, I do not share your "all or nothing" attitude. Not on this matter, not on any other. Not every right / idea principle / ... is perfect (subjective) as it is written down, tweaks / updates / ... are almost always neccessary. The world has more colors to offer than just black and white, saying "you don't accept an idea at all if you don't accept it without proposing changes for the (subjective) better" is just untrue.
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles Of course there is always a point where a protest against a hate speech is no rightful and justified objection but a mere trifle, but I think the courts are doing a good job filtering out the latter.
It actually takes more heart, skill and social sentiment to use the limited FoS instead of being “””courageously””” brusque, rude and impolite.
What do you gain from your full-on Freedom of Speech anyway in comparison to the restricted version that makes your variant so much
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles better and desirable? You exchange the protection of a human's ehtics, beliefs, values and integrity against the allowance to insult people on every imaginable level. Not because that additional "freedom" is really needed. Not because you couldn't have expressed the things you wanted to say in a different, acceptable way without being limited in your freedom of thought / expression: JUST because. Because you can then say: "Look, I have more rights than you! My country, the land
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles of the free men! Where you are free to express yourself any way you want (but are subsequently forced to suck it up if somebody else exerts his rights). Objectively regarded, this makes the society uncomfortable, creating unneccessary sources of friction which ultimately explode in one way or another, but hey: I have the RIGHT to do it!"
No offense man, but that's the way it's coming across. I can see absolutely no reason for or benefit from that additional piece of freedom,
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles only negative results. Do you really think that's worth it? That this is a positive tradeoff? I don't think so, but I'm afraid I know your answer as well.
Take your gun laws for another example of how unlimited freedom is not always a good thing. Some law from the Wild West-era (where guns were needed to rob the natives of their homeland) allows every adult citizen to carry a gun for self protection, thus making the country a safer place. Ironically, the opposite is true.
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles Easy weapon access produces more opportunities, produces easier ways to solve problems of any kind. "Weapons don't kill people, people kill people". Wrong! People with easy access to weapons kill people (Armed or not. Let's face it, if you stare down the barrel of a mugger in a dark alley, you're not whipping your weapon out faster then he pulls the trigger.).
So again, this more than dubious protection is worth all the additional lost lives, all the tragedy that would have
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles been avoided for the major part? No man, just... no.
Also, your whole last comment makes the impression that you're seeing our "total freedom vs. limited freedom" debate under the nazi-context of the other guy's comment only. This is not the case. Germany is luckily not the only country with that sort of limited FoS. We are not the only country that has hard regulations regarding hate speech in general and nazi-related restrictions in special. Actually, if you closely compare
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles the american stance with all those freedoms to the other industrial nations, you'll see that you're standing pretty much alone (in all this extent). So again, this is no germany-specific issue, just debating limited FoS in general, and has certainly nothing to do with "totalitarian thought control". Now you sound like one of those conspiracy theorists who tell you to put tinfoil over your head so the government can't read your mind.
If the american citizen is ever able to
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles look past all the hollow phrases like "it is our god-given duty / right to...", "it is part of the american way of life" etc. etc. that your leaders routinely sprout almost mantra-like to justify anything and everything, then maybe, MAYBE you'll see some day that restrictions are a benefit to society as a whole, as weird as it may sound.
I go on record here with saying that the day where slurs and impolite, insulting speech are considered "cavalier" in the major part of the
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles world will mark the ultimate downfall of humanity. It's been getting worse and worse over the last decade anyway, especially since the rapid development of the internet.
I guess the cultures with all their different rules and freedoms that we grew up in are so natural to us that we cannot feel into or understand another point of view. You can't imagine that restrictions have positive sides and I fail to see any benefit from total freedom. Was nice to get some insight though.
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
@xSuperiorManx
Odd that someone who argues against freer speech needs to use so many comment fields.
"You can't imagine that restrictions have positive sides and I fail to see any benefit from total freedom."
Way to distort both arguments there, pal. I never said I don't see the benefit of restrictions and I never claimed to believe in total freedom. You're exhibit A in why restrictions on speech is a failure because people can claim to have heard anything and are then free to react wrongly.
TheJediCharles 11 months ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles I need many comment fields because Youtube sadly has a pretty low character limit. Free speech (limited or not) also has nothing to do with the length of the spoken (or written) text. You know that as well.
I re-read your first three comments and it still comes across that you believe in the full free speech and don't believe in the restricted variant. Same with the last sentence of your latest comment. If you think I misunderstood you, feel free to rephrase your opinion.
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
@xSuperiorManx
I had an initial statement, but also further clarification. but your response did not regard it all,but only a wrongly summarized version. You basically leave the impression that clarification is wasted on you because you're fixated only on the portions you prefer to deal with.
Here's something to leave you with, and I am leaving.
A person's usage of Nazi-esque references for mere effect is less offensive than a wish or legal force to silence him on those grounds alone. The end.
TheJediCharles 11 months ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles I answered to everything you said in your comments whereas you ignored each and every point I brought up in my oh-so-long response, yet you accuse me of answering selective?
You argue against limited FoS and say that everybody should be allowed to say anything (except measureably harmful stuff like the fire-scenario) but then claim to be misunderstood and refuse a better clarification. That makes as much sense as the last sentence of your previous comment (Allowing rude speech
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheJediCharles speech prevents "misunderstandings"?) or the last part from your last comment. After all, that's entirely subjective and the majority of the industrialized nations luckily disagrees there, leaving your allowance for cheap, primitive and offensive grandstagery a minority's point of view.
xSuperiorManx 11 months ago
cool!
SutoomiJFox 11 months ago
*drools*
The909Virus 11 months ago
Why do you advertise an app you didn't released yet? On the website shown in the video you're redrected to bambi secondscreen ....
an3k 11 months ago
Fantastic! Now we just need to wait for the movie to actually be RELEASED. *impatient*
MadiMoogle 11 months ago
WHAT ABOUT ANDROID?
Burn845285 11 months ago 18
Urm-- I'm pretty sure this is just an aggrandized version of bonus features.
... BUT HEY, IT'S ON THE IPAD. WA-HAOW.
HomeStarRunnerTron 11 months ago 24
@HomeStarRunnerTron shit the FUCK UP
RebirthWoWGuild 11 months ago 4
+1, monsieur. That guy's so annoying.
HomeStarRunnerTron 11 months ago
@HomeStarRunnerTron I'd lash out against society if I didn't have an iPad too.
PTSTelevision 10 months ago
cant Waite until the ipad 3 comes out with 3d , just dreaming but this looks like an awesome feature i have neither but this just makes it more appealing, i saw it at the Melbourne premier and loved it awesome move and having tablet features will bring users closer to the grid
vcval 11 months ago
Woah now thats awesome , sadly I dont have a blue ray player
drn000 11 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
this movie is one of bests
gustavogdk1 11 months ago
@gustavogdk1 i agree yet someone spammed you.
darkabomination345 11 months ago
Whoa
The3SkypeAsians 11 months ago
AWESOME!!!!!!! :D
Storiesfreak 11 months ago
Siiiiiiick <3
xX5Marissa5Xx 11 months ago