I was cynical against the unborn "personhood" movement based on that "person" is a word that can be given to anything, and that its the whim of society which dictates who is a person.
But this lecture has given me a different view of the situation, it doesn't base its argument on semantics, but rather using the enemies' tactic for the benefit of the unborn.
They say the unborn is not a person and the woman is a person, so you can kill a non-person, but make the unborn a person to stop killing.
I was cynical against the unborn "personhood" movement based on that "person" is a word that can be given to anything, and that its the whim of society which dictates who is a person.
But this lecture has given me a different view of the situation, it doesn't base its argument on semantics, but rather using the enemies' tactic for the benefit of the unborn.
They say the unborn is not a person and the woman is a person, so you can kill a non-person, but make the unborn a person to stop killing.
Shenanirats 2 years ago
I would comment on this, but I'm not supposed to from work, so I will write later.
brochureman 2 years ago
But you just commented?
Nulono 2 years ago 2
FANTASTIC speech!!!
Every pro-lifer should see this!!!
discomike1000 2 years ago 2
Interesting lecture.
AhazAlford 2 years ago 2