Of course its not a question of planes and buildings and such, but what came out of it instantly which was the 'USA Patriot Act' which annilated our 'Bill Of Rights' , the powers that be could care less if I thought it were a conspiracy or not. which I 101% believe it was
...and stage the whole thing get actors to play people on the street looking at burning wtc. Seeing the planes ect. All for what when its easier to just crash planes 'if' it was inside job.
maybe it because youre measuring the distance of two different supports on the same bridge. the visibility may have changed because of the smoke. maybe.
this is just silly... i believe it was an inside job, and there was a cover-up, but give me a break... the whole "fake video" theory is a little... what's the word... tacked-on? unnecessary? it's so much easier, more credible, and less risky to actually crash the planes into the buildings... why bother faking the video and risking being debunked by eye-witness testimony?
digging for gold, the camera is not circling the object when much of the distortion occurs. The zooming out has finished and the position on the towers are fairly fixed but the bridge is all over the place. And this has nothing to do with wisdom and everything to do with and common sense. Wisdom would be doubting what you've been told by mass media without a healthy dose of skepticism.
Did you seriously just use the BIBLE to insult people?
Wow.
And as for "perspective distortion", you are making sense. However, movement stops at :50, 1:02 to 1:12, and 1:56 to 2:15. When the movement stops, all movement should stop, but the back layer, the bridge, keeps moving.
Your rationale applies from 1:13 to 1:30, but if any part of the video is fake, it kills the credibility for the whole camera shot.
This is a very well understood effect that occurs when you track an object while circling it. The camera is "trucking" to the right, while simultaneously panning to the left, keeping the WTC stationary. When you do this, buildings farther away from the WTC will appear to move faster than those closer. This is true for buildings in front of and behind the WTC. This effect can be seen in countless TV shows and movies with scenes on top of buildings shot from a helicopter. (comment continues...)
What you said makes sense. However, when the camera stops moving, so should the bridge. You are correct that given the placement of the camera, Towers, and bridge, that the bridge will move rapidly even when the camera is moved very little. Example: :50, 1:02 to 1:12, and 1:56 to 2:15.
From 1:13 to 1:30, however, your rationale applies.
tthanks for posting these videos.. makes us who already embrace the truth even more furrious about 9/11.. and makes others hopefully question the media and the "truth" of what they thuoght was the reason behind those awful and inhuman attacks
Because the helicopter don't understand the norms. 9 11 was a TV job!!! no planes,there are holograms and a lot of filters,,,,!! there were Bombs!!
HumanosUnidos 1 year ago
@thenormog Not really there are other ways. You can paste and change color at a click of a button.
doughauf 1 year ago
@JesseusM I would have to say that building 7 was the smoking pistol.
doughauf 1 year ago 6
Of course its not a question of planes and buildings and such, but what came out of it instantly which was the 'USA Patriot Act' which annilated our 'Bill Of Rights' , the powers that be could care less if I thought it were a conspiracy or not. which I 101% believe it was
GodsOutlaw1964 1 year ago
...and stage the whole thing get actors to play people on the street looking at burning wtc. Seeing the planes ect. All for what when its easier to just crash planes 'if' it was inside job.
thenormog 2 years ago
If you didn't say it was fake, I would say the bridge is too close to be real.
Kalphiter45 2 years ago
maybe it because youre measuring the distance of two different supports on the same bridge. the visibility may have changed because of the smoke. maybe.
briansuxxx 2 years ago
this is just silly... i believe it was an inside job, and there was a cover-up, but give me a break... the whole "fake video" theory is a little... what's the word... tacked-on? unnecessary? it's so much easier, more credible, and less risky to actually crash the planes into the buildings... why bother faking the video and risking being debunked by eye-witness testimony?
PRIMEx420 2 years ago
digging for gold, the camera is not circling the object when much of the distortion occurs. The zooming out has finished and the position on the towers are fairly fixed but the bridge is all over the place. And this has nothing to do with wisdom and everything to do with and common sense. Wisdom would be doubting what you've been told by mass media without a healthy dose of skepticism.
Somnambulo 2 years ago 23
Thank you
911TruthVideos 2 years ago 4
Nice quote
woody91142069 2 years ago
Did you seriously just use the BIBLE to insult people?
Wow.
And as for "perspective distortion", you are making sense. However, movement stops at :50, 1:02 to 1:12, and 1:56 to 2:15. When the movement stops, all movement should stop, but the back layer, the bridge, keeps moving.
Your rationale applies from 1:13 to 1:30, but if any part of the video is fake, it kills the credibility for the whole camera shot.
Fake
AnnihilateNWO 2 years ago
This is a very well understood effect that occurs when you track an object while circling it. The camera is "trucking" to the right, while simultaneously panning to the left, keeping the WTC stationary. When you do this, buildings farther away from the WTC will appear to move faster than those closer. This is true for buildings in front of and behind the WTC. This effect can be seen in countless TV shows and movies with scenes on top of buildings shot from a helicopter. (comment continues...)
lemonrind 2 years ago
What you said makes sense. However, when the camera stops moving, so should the bridge. You are correct that given the placement of the camera, Towers, and bridge, that the bridge will move rapidly even when the camera is moved very little. Example: :50, 1:02 to 1:12, and 1:56 to 2:15.
From 1:13 to 1:30, however, your rationale applies.
AnnihilateNWO 2 years ago
U cant trust the news or anything if u werent there to see it.........dont waste ur time beelving and being deceived by evil
only God knows is right.............
u study this stuff u end up so wrong u wasted all ur time..the world is evily corrupt ud do better progress praying for planet earth
pce
pce
SeanSaosin 2 years ago
Wow that's scary, god knows what's going on in this world.
Biggsarino 2 years ago
everything whats happend on 9/11 did Bush !!
roy1990NL 2 years ago
tthanks for posting these videos.. makes us who already embrace the truth even more furrious about 9/11.. and makes others hopefully question the media and the "truth" of what they thuoght was the reason behind those awful and inhuman attacks
kurdnar 2 years ago